Shabana AH, Ouhayoun JP, Sawaf MH, Forest N. A comparative biochemical and immunological analysis of cytokeratin patterns in the oral epithelium of the miniature pig and man.
Arch Oral Biol 1989;
34:249-59. [PMID:
2480769 DOI:
10.1016/0003-9969(89)90065-4]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
In man, cytokeratin constitutes a family of 19 polypeptides that show different but distinct distribution patterns in the various epithelia. Changes in these patterns may occur during epithelial development and differentiation. The cytokeratin patterns in the oral mucosa of the miniature pig, an animal used in studies of wound healing, were investigated. Surgical biopsies were obtained from the gingiva, hard palate and alveolar mucosa of both man and pig. The cytokeratins were analysed by immunofluorescence, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and by immunoblotting. Nine monoclonal antibodies were used to identify the different cytokeratin polypeptides in cryostat sections. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis showed that pig oral mucosa contains at least 10 different polypeptides, five of the acidic type I and five of the basic type II cytokeratins. These were different from the human cytokeratin polypeptides and accordingly were designated P1-P10, according to their molecular weight and isoelectric mobility. Their molecular weight varied between 48 and 69 kdalton and the pHi varied between 5 and 7.3. Immunoblotting showed the monoclonal antibody Ks 13.1 (anticytokeratins Nos 13 and 14) to cross-react with the pig polypeptides P10 and P8. Immunolocalization showed that all the antibodies cross-reacted with the pig tissue except Ks 19.1 (anticytokeratin No. 19). It was possible to differentiate between pig alveolar mucosa, which expressed only P3, P4, P5, P8 and P10, and the gingival and hard palatal mucosae, which expressed all 10 polypeptides except P5. This distinction was made by antibody 6B10 (anticytokeratin No. 4), which reacted only with alveolar mucosa; antibody Ks 13.1, which strongly reacted with uncornified mucosa but weakly with cornified mucosa (gingiva and palate); and any of RKSE60, Kk 8.60 or EE21.6 (anticytokeratin No. 10, anticytokeratins Nos 10 and 11 and anticytokeratins Nos 1, 2, 10 and 11, respectively), which reacted strongly with cornified mucosa but weakly, if at all, with uncornified mucosa. These findings provide a baseline for studies on epithelial differentiation in the miniature pig such as in wound healing.
Collapse