Dental unit waterline contamination and its possible implications during periodontal surgery

Ozone Therapy in Medicine and Dentistry: A Review of the Literature

Ozone has been successfully used in medicine for over 100 years due to its microbiological qualities. Its powerful oxidation impact, which results in the production of free radicals, and its ability to cause the direct death of nearly all microorganisms is the basis for its bactericide, virucide, and fungicide properties. Ozone also has a medicinal impact that speeds up blood flow and aids wound healing. Ozone may be applied as a gas or dissolved in water for medical purposes. Despite the benefits of using ozone therapeutically, concerns about its use in dentistry still exist. We aimed to provide a summary of the current uses of ozone in medicine and dentistry. An electronic search was performed for all English scientific papers published between 2012 and 2023 using PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar search engines. Ozone, clinical applications, medicine, and dentistry were the search terms used. Seventy full-text articles describing the use of ozone therapy in medicine and dentistry were included in the present review. Ozone has shown several beneficial effects in the medical field. However, despite the encouraging in vitro evidence, the clinical use of ozone in dentistry has not yet been demonstrated as highly effective.

Construction of ZnO/PCL Antibacterial Coating Potentially for Dental Unit Waterlines

The formation of bacterial biofilms and the contamination of treatment water within dental unit waterlines can lead to a risk of secondary bacterial infections in immunocompromised patients. Although chemical disinfectants can reduce the contamination of treatment water, they can also cause corrosion damage to dental unit waterlines. Considering the antibacterial effect of ZnO, a ZnO-containing coating was prepared on the surface of polyurethane waterlines using polycaprolactone (PCL) with a good film-forming capacity. The ZnO-containing PCL coating improved the hydrophobicity of polyurethane waterlines, thus inhibiting the adhesion of bacteria. Moreover, the continuous slow release of Zn ions endowed polyurethane waterlines with antibacterial activity, thus effectively preventing the formation of bacterial biofilms. Meanwhile, the ZnO-containing PCL coating had good biocompatibility. The present study suggests that ZnO-containing PCL coating can realize a long-term antibacterial effect on the polyurethane waterlines by itself, providing a novel strategy for the manufacture of autonomous antibacterial dental unit waterlines.

Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Numerous studies have shown that dental unit water lines (DUWLs) are often contaminated by a wide range of micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa) and various prevalence have been reported for it in previous studies. Therefore, this review study aims to describe the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which the related keywords in different international databases, including Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus were searched. The retrieved studies were screened and the required data were extracted from the included studies. Three standard methods including American Dental Association (ADA), The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and contaminated > 100 CFU/ml(C-100) standards were used to assess the bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs. All studies that calculated the prevalence of bacterial biofilm contamination of DUWLs, and English full-text studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies that did not have relevant data or used unusual laboratory methods were excluded. Methodological risk of bias was assessed by a related checklist and finally, the data were pooled by fixed or random-effect models.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-six studies were identified and screened and 26 related studies were included in the meta-analysis. The oldest included study was published in 1976 and the most recent study was published in 2020. According to the ADA, CDC and C-100 standards, the prevalence of bacterial contamination was estimated to be 85.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.0-94.0%), 77.0% (95%CI: 66.0-85.0%) and 69.0% (95%CI: 67.0-71.0%), respectively. The prevalence of Legionella Pneumophila and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in DUWLs was estimated to be 12.0% (95%CI: 10.0-14.0%) and 8.0% (95%CI: 2.0-24.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review study suggested a high prevalence of bacterial biofilm in DUWLs; therefore, the use of appropriate disinfecting protocol is recommended to reduce the prevalence of contamination and reduce the probable cross-infection.

Assessment of microbiota diversity in dental unit waterline contamination

BACKGROUND

Dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) provide water for handpieces, air/water syringes, and mouth-rinse water outlets. DUWL contamination can negatively affect the operating environment and public health. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the bacterial concentrations and microbial composition in the DUWLs from different dental specialties.

METHODS

We collected 350 5-mL dental water samples (from high-speed handpieces, air/water syringes, and mouth-rinse water outlets) from 60 dental chair units (DCUs) at a dental hospital to determine the bacterial concentrations by culture methods. Meanwhile, to investigate the diversity and community structure of microbe in the DUWLs, 17 high-quality DNA from 60 250-mL air/water syringe water samples, which were collected from the same 60 DCUs, were analyzed using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing.

RESULTS

The median bacterial concentration was 166 (31.5, 672.5) CFU/mL and the range was 0-3,816,000 CFU/mL. Only 42.6% of the water samples had bacterial concentrations below 100 CFU/mL. The Kruskal-Wallis H-test revealed that the water samples from three dental specialties had significantly different bacterial concentrations (H = 27.441, P < 0.01). High-throughput sequencing results showed significant differences in bacterial community structure between periodontics and the other two dental specialties. In the samples from three dental specialties, 508 OTUs were detected, with 160, 182 and 176 OTUs unique to the periodontics, endodontics and prosthodontics specialties, respectively. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) suggested that Hydrocarboniphaga, Zoogloea, Aquabacterium, and Hydrogenophaga were enriched in the periodontics specialty; Acinetobacter, Geothrix, and Desulfovibrio were enriched in the prosthodontics specialty; and Alistipes, Clostridium XIVa, and Serratia were enriched in the endodontics specialty. Seven potentially human-pathogenic genera (Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Sphingomonas, Ochrobactrum, Rhizobium, Brevundimonas, and Methylobacterium) with relative abundance exceeding 1% were also detected in the DUWLs.

CONCLUSIONS

The bacterial concentrations and microbial composition were influenced by different dental specialties, so a validated disinfection protocol should be used to control DUWL contamination in different dental specialties.

Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing

Purpose

This study evaluated the extent of bacterial contamination in water from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs).

Methodology

Water samples were collected (before flushing, 1 min post-flushing, and 3 min post-flushing) from 24 clinics (Group A: no disinfection, Group B: citric acid disinfectant) of a Government Dental College. Bacterial counts, identification, antibiotic sensitivity tests, determination of endotoxin levels, and scanning electron microscopy (to confirm the presence of biofilm) were performed.

Results

The most common opportunistic bacteria were P. aeruginosa (95%), S. aureus (58%), S. auricularis (49%), P. fluorescens (44%), and A. baumannii (20%). Approximately 50% of the bacterial isolates were resistant to two or more antibiotics. Flushing for 3 min did not reduce the contamination of water from Group A clinics which exceeded the recommendation of ≤500 CFU/ml. No bacterial growth was seen in Group B samples. Endotoxin levels were >5.00 endotoxin units (EU)/ml in Group A and ranged from 1.33 to 5.00 EU/ml in Group B clinics. Scanning electron microscopy images showed bacterial biofilms on the surfaces of the tubes.

Conclusions

DUWL contamination is a serious issue in dentistry, and the microbiological quality of the water must be monitored regularly. Further studies on endotoxin exposure and prevention are therefore necessary.

Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment

Infection risk management in a dental unit waterline (DUWL) involves healthcare personnel and patients and is related to routine exposure to water and aerosols that may contain bacterial species. To improve water safety plans, maintenance, and sanitation procedures, analyses of heterotrophic plate counts (HPCs) at 36 °C, and two other microorganisms frequently associated with biofilms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella spp., were performed in order to evaluate differences in microbiological contamination between two types of DUWLs: Type A, provided by a water tank, and Type B, directly connected to municipal water. The data showed that the water supply and water safety plan differentially influenced microbiological contamination: Type A DUWLs were more contaminated than Type B DUWLs for all microbiological parameters tested, with significant changes in the percentage of positive samples and contamination levels that were beyond the limits of standard guidelines. The results obtained show how the storage tank, the absence of anti-retraction valves, and the disinfection procedures performed are the main critical points of Type A DUWLs, which confirms that dental unit management (maintenance/sanitization) is often missed or not correctly applied by stakeholders, with an underestimation of the real risk of infection for patients and operators.

Dental Unit Water Lines and their Disinfection and Management: A Review

The perceived threat to public health from dental unit water line (DUWL) contamination comes from opportunistic and respiratory pathogens such as Legionella spp, Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) and pseudomonads. These organisms can grow and multiply in the DUWL biofilm to reach infective concentrations, with the potential for inhalation leading to respiratory infections or direct contamination of surgical wounds. In this paper we discuss current legislation and practical methods for delivering water within the DUWL that meets the standards for safety. Clinical relevance: Understanding the clinical relevance and methods for decontaminating DUWL is essential to create a safe working environment in dentistry.

High throughput sequencing-based analysis of microbial diversity in dental unit waterlines supports the importance of providing safe water for clinical use

This study aims to explore the water quality of dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) and the diversity of microbial communities in DUWLs. Water samples from 33 dental chair units (DCUs) were collected, diluted and then spread on sterilized R2A plate for incubation. Subsequently, the microbial colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) were recorded by an automatic colony analyzer. Total DNA extracted from the rest of the samples was tested on the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform. T-test and Kruskal-Wallis rank test were adopted for statistical analysis. Significance was assumed at a P<0.05. After incubation, the average total microbial count was 21,413.13±17,861.00CFU/ml. High-throughput sequencing revealed 10 bacterial phyla, including 9 identified and 1 unclassified phyla. Totally 63 sequences were identified at the genus level, including 42 genera, 3 tentative species and 18 unclassified genera. In addition, 7 potential human pathogenic bacteria were detected. In summary, department, brand and service life of DCUs do not influence the water quality of DUWLs significantly. The diversity of microbial communities in DUWLs is abundant and includes both pathogenic and some unknown bacteria.

In situ Biofilm Formation by Multi-species Oral Bacteria Under Flowing and Anaerobic Conditions

An understanding of biofilm behavior of periodontopathic bacteria is key to the development of effective oral therapies. We hypothesized that interspecies bacterial aggregates play an important role in anaerobic biofilm establishment and proliferation, and contribute to the survivability of the biofilm against therapeutic agents. The system developed in this study assessed a multi-species ( Streptococcus gordonii, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, and Fusobacterium nucleatum) biofilm formation under anaerobic and flowing conditions with the use of an in situ image analysis system. The biofilm was comprised of a base film of non-aggregated cells and complex interspecies aggregates that formed in the planktonic phase which rapidly colonized the surface, reaching 58 ± 9% and 65 ± 11.8% coverage by 5 and 24 hrs, respectively. Upon SDS (0.1%) treatment of a 24-hour biofilm, substantial detachment (55 ± 14%, P < 0.05) of the aggregates was observed, while the base film bacteria remained attached but non-viable. Rapid re-establishment of the biofilm occurred via attachment of viable planktonic aggregates.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter sp. clonal selection leads to successive waves of contamination of water in dental care units

Dental care unit waterlines (DCUWs) consist of complex networks of thin tubes that facilitate the formation of microbial biofilms. Due to the predilection toward a wet environment, strong adhesion, biofilm formation, and resistance to biocides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a major human opportunistic pathogen, is adapted to DCUW colonization. Other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli, such as members of the genus Achromobacter, are emerging pathogens found in water networks. We reported the 6.5-year dynamics of bacterial contamination of waterlines in a dental health care center with 61 dental care units (DCUs) connected to the same water supply system. The conditions allowed the selection and the emergence of clones of Achromobacter sp. and P. aeruginosa characterized by multilocus sequence typing, multiplex repetitive elements-based PCR, and restriction fragment length polymorphism in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, biofilm formation, and antimicrobial susceptibility. One clone of P. aeruginosa and 2 clones of Achromobacter sp. colonized successively all of the DCUWs: the last colonization by P. aeruginosa ST309 led to the closing of the dental care center. Successive dominance of species and clones was linked to biocide treatments. Achromobacter strains were weak biofilm producers compared to P. aeruginosa ST309, but the coculture of P. aeruginosa and Achromobacter enhanced P. aeruginosa ST309 biofilm formation. Intraclonal genomic microevolution was observed in the isolates of P. aeruginosa ST309 collected chronologically and in Achromobacter sp. clone A. The contamination control was achieved by a complete reorganization of the dental health care center by removing the connecting tubes between DCUs.

Healthcare-associated viral and bacterial infections in dentistry

Infection prevention in dentistry is an important topic that has gained more interest in recent years and guidelines for the prevention of cross-transmission are common practice in many countries. However, little is known about the real risks of cross-transmission, specifically in the dental healthcare setting. This paper evaluated the literature to determine the risk of cross-transmission and infection of viruses and bacteria that are of particular relevance in the dental practice environment. Facts from the literature on HSV, VZV, HIV, Hepatitis B, C and D viruses, Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Legionella spp. and multi-resistant bacteria are presented. There is evidence that Hepatitis B virus is a real threat for cross-infection in dentistry. Data for the transmission of, and infection with, other viruses or bacteria in dental practice are scarce. However, a number of cases are probably not acknowledged by patients, healthcare workers and authorities. Furthermore, cross-transmission in dentistry is under-reported in the literature. For the above reasons, the real risks of cross-transmission are likely to be higher. There is therefore a need for prospective longitudinal research in this area, to determine the real risks of cross-infection in dentistry. This will assist the adoption of effective hygiene procedures in dental practice.

Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century

Dental chair units (DCUs) use water to cool and irrigate DCU-supplied instruments and tooth surfaces, and provide rinsewater during dental treatment. A complex network of interconnected plastic dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) supply water to these instruments. DUWLs are universally prone to microbial biofilm contamination seeded predominantly from microorganisms in supply water. Consequently, DUWL output water invariably becomes contaminated by high densities of microorganisms, principally Gram-negative environmental bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella species, but sometimes contain human-derived pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus. Patients and staff are exposed to microorganisms from DUWL output water and to contaminated aerosols generated by DCU instruments. A wide variety of approaches, many unsuccessful, have been proposed to control DUWL biofilm. More recently, advances in biofilm science, chemical DUWL biofilm treatment agents, DCU design, supply water treatment and development of automated DUWL biofilm control systems have provided effective long-term solutions to DUWL biofilm control.

First report of an acute purulent maxillary sinusitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa secondary to dental implant placement in an immunocompetent patient

STUDY DESIGN

In this case report, we present maxillary Pseudomonas aeruginosa sinusitis in an immunocompetent patient who underwent an autologous bone transplant for the insertion of dental implants.

RESULTS

The infection was eradicated after removal of the dental implants and long-term antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite the infection resolution, severe complications were observed with important legal consequences.

Evaluation of Aerosol and Water Contamination and Control of Cross Infection in Dental Clinics

BACKGROUND

The oral cavity is an unique environment which provides an ideal medium for bacterial growth. As a result of repeated exposure to the microorganisms present in blood and saliva, the dental health professionals and the patients are at a higher risk for developing many infectious diseases. A pilot study was carried out in the Dept of Dental Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College to assess the risk of cross infection in dental clinics.

METHODS

Samples were collected from different dental surgeries of the Dept of Dental Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College and sent for microbiological culture and identification to the Dept of Microbiology, Armed Forces Medical College. The sampling was carried out in two stages, before and after implementing a set protocol.

RESULT

All dental unit waterlines were coated with a well established biofilm made up of filamentous and bacillus-like microorganisms in first stage of study. There was marked reduction in the number of colonies from the samples collected during second stage. Same findings were observed in the samples of aerosol produced by ultrasonic scalers.

CONCLUSION

The present study concluded that the new set protocol followed is significantly effective in reducing the microbial load in the water tubing, container and aerosol production. It is an effective measure for reducing the chances of cross infection in the dental surgery.

Microbial biofilm control within the dental clinic: reducing multiple risks

This short review focuses on biofilms in the dental clinic environment. Microbial biofilms are potentially a significant source of cross-contamination and cross-infection in the dental clinic. Biofilms in dental chair unit waterlines (DUWLs), suction hoses and fittings pose the most significant risk as these may come into contact with the patient during treatment. These can be managed effectively by regular disinfection using chemical disinfectants and procedures that have proven efficacy. As dental chair units (DCUs) are classified as medical devices, there is a requirement for DCU manufacturers to provide detailed guidance for their decontamination. Planned routine preventive maintenance of the dental clinic water network and good quality water will considerably minimise infection risks from microorganisms in tap water and has benefits for the operation of other clinic equipment. Regular and effective cleaning and disinfection of taps, sinks and splash-backs will help to minimise reservoirs and disseminators of potentially pathogenic bacteria from these areas.

Workplace determinants of endotoxin exposure in dental healthcare facilities in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

Aerosols generated during dental procedures have been reported to contain endotoxin as a result of bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines. This study investigated the determinants of airborne endotoxin exposure in dental healthcare settings.

METHODS

The study population included dental personnel (n = 454) from five academic dental institutions in South Africa. Personal air samples (n = 413) in various dental jobs and water samples (n = 403) from dental handpieces and basin taps were collected. The chromogenic-1000 limulus amebocyte lysate assay was used to determine endotoxin levels. Exposure metrics were developed on the basis of individually measured exposures and average levels within each job category. Analysis of variance and multivariate linear regression models were constructed to ascertain the determinants of exposure in the dental group.

RESULTS

There was a 2-fold variation in personal airborne endotoxin from the least exposed (administration) to the most exposed (laboratory) jobs (geometric mean levels: 2.38 versus 5.63 EU m(-3)). Three percent of personal samples were above DECOS recommended exposure limit (50 EU m(-3)). In the univariate linear models, the age of the dental units explained the most variability observed in the personal air samples (R(2) = 0.20, P < 0.001), followed by the season of the year (R(2) = 0.11, P < 0.001). Other variables such as institution and total number of dental units per institution also explained a modest degree of variability. A multivariate model explaining the greatest variability (adjusted R(2) = 0.40, P < 0.001) included: the age of institution buildings, total number of dental units per institution, ambient temperature, ambient air velocity, endotoxin levels in water, job category (staff versus students), dental unit model type and age of dental unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from job type, dental unit characteristics are important predictors of airborne endotoxin levels in this setting.

Measurement of airborne bacteria and endotoxin generated during dental cleaning

Dynamic dental instruments generate abundant aerosols in the work environment. Dental unit waterlines (DUWL) support a large microbial population and can be a significant source of bioaerosols generated during dental treatments. This study was conducted to characterize bioaerosol generation during dental treatments performed in standardized conditions. Culture-based method (R2A, and blood agar with and without O2) and fluorescence microscopy were used. Dental cleaning procedures were performed in an isolated treatment room with controlled ventilation rate. Andersen microbial samplers were used to collect culturable bioaerosols generated before (baseline), during, and after 2 hr of dental treatments. Inhalable dust samplers were used to measure total bioaerosols content in dental hygienist's and patients' breathing zones. AGI-30 were used for the collection of the endotoxin. The use of fluorescence microscopy in combination with culture demonstrated that dental staff and patients were exposed to up to 1.86 E+05 bacteria/m(3) generated during treatments. Fortunately, bioaerosols returned to baseline within 2 hr after the dental procedures. The small diameter of the aerosols generated (< 1 microm) suggests that the risk of contact between the aerosolized bacteria and the respiratory system of exposed individuals is likely to occur.

Assessment of inhibitory effects of fluoride-coated tubes on biofilm formation by using the in vitro dental unit waterline biofilm model

This study aimed to establish an in vitro model to simulate biofilms formed in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) and to investigate the ability of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-coated tubes to inhibit biofilm formation using this model. The water and biofilm samples were obtained from DUWLs which had been clinically used for 2.5 years, and the predominant bacteria were identified. A conventional polyurethane tube was incubated for 24 to 96 h in the mixed flora of isolated bacteria, and the optimal incubation conditions to simulate a clinically formed biofilm were determined by observation with a scanning electron microscope. Biofilm formation on a PVDF-coated tube was observed using this in vitro model, and the adherence of different bacterial species to conventional and PVDF-coated tubes was assessed. Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Acinetobacter haemolytics, and Methylobacterium mesophilicum were predominantly isolated from contaminated DUWLs. Incubation of the polyurethane tube with the mixed flora containing these three species for 96 h resulted in the formation of a mature biofilm similar to the one clinically observed. The PVDF-coated tube was significantly less adhesive to all three bacterial species than the polyurethane tube (P < 0.05 by the Mann-Whitney U test), and the attachment of small amounts of rods was observed even after incubation with the mixed flora for 96 h. In conclusion, an in vitro biofilm model was obtained by using a mixed flora of bacteria isolated from DUWLs, and the PVDF-coated tube was found to be effective in preventing biofilm formation using this model.

Endotoxin contamination in the dental surgery

Dental waterlines contain large numbers of Gram-negative bacteria. Endotoxin, a component of such organisms, has significant health implications. Paired samples of dental unit water and the aerosols generated during dental procedures were collected, and assayed for bacteria and endotoxin levels, using heterotrophic plate counts and the Limulus amoebocyte lysate test. Consistent with published studies, the extent of bacterial contamination in the dental waters sampled for this investigation surpassed the levels associated with potable water, with counts in excess of 2.0x10(6) c.f.u. ml(-1) in some samples. Correspondingly high concentrations of endotoxin [up to 15 000 endotoxin units (EU) ml(-1)] were present in the water. A statistically significant Spearman correlation coefficient of rho=0.94 between endotoxin (EU ml(-1)) and bacterial load (c.f.u. ml(-1)) was demonstrated. All of the aerosol samples contained detectable endotoxin. Further studies of the consequences of dental endotoxin exposure, and evaluation of means to prevent exposure, are warranted.

The role of manufacturers in reducing biofilms in dental chair waterlines

OBJECTIVES

This paper reviews how dental chair unit (DCU) manufacturers can contribute practically to resolving the problem of biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines (DUWs).

STUDY SELECTION

The review concentrates on how novel developments and changes in a range of specific areas have, and might contribute to DUW biofilm control. These include (i) DCU engineering and design changes; (ii) improvements to DCU supply water quality; (iii) development of automated DUW treatment procedures that are effective at controlling biofilm in the long-term, safe for patients and dental staff, environmentally friendly and which do not exhibit adverse effects on DCU components after prolonged use.

SOURCES

The majority of the material contained in this review is based on, or supported by the peer-reviewed literature.

DATA

The current consensus from the literature reveals that the emphasis on DUW biofilm and its control has focused on describing the problem and its control using a range of periodic and residual DUW treatment agents. Unfortunately, until recently, DCU manufacturers have provided very little specific guidance in this regard. Indeed, ensuring that DCUs provide good quality output water has generally been regarded to be the responsibility of dental practitioners. Some recent studies have shown that novel DCUs with integral semi-automated or automated DUW cleaning systems can effectively control DUW biofilm in the long-term. However, there are other potential DCU engineering and design changes that DCU manufacturers could undertake to further improve DUW biofilm control.

CONCLUSIONS

DCU manufacturers can significantly contribute to controlling the problem of DUW biofilm.

Microbial biofilm formation in DUWS and their control using disinfectants

OBJECTIVES

Due to the presence of extended narrow bore tubing and long periods of stagnation, dental unit water systems (DUWs) can be prone to relatively high levels of microbial contamination, including the formation of biofilm and the presence of opportunistic pathogens, irrespective of the source and quality of the inflowing water. Whilst the European Union (EU) has yet to set a definitive microbiological guideline, the American Dental Association (ADA) has set a maximum of <200 colony forming units (cfu)/ml for DUWs water in the USA. The objective of this review is to discuss why microbial contamination and biofilms are so prevalent in DUWs, as well as the role of disinfectants and their potential for achieving microbial water quality levels recommended by the ADA.

STUDY SELECTION

The review outlines the principal factors responsible for biofilm formation in DUWs and a number of mechanisms used for microbial control.

SOURCES

The source material contained in this review is taken from the peer-reviewed literature.

DATA

A variety of disinfectants are available for use, but controlled laboratory and clinical studies have shown that they can vary markedly in their efficacy and suitability for use. Some products have been shown to successfully remove biofilm and consistently reduce the microbial load of out-flowing water to <200 cfu/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

The effective delivery of approved disinfectants can control the level of microorganisms in DUWs at acceptable levels.

Do contaminated dental unit waterlines pose a risk of infection?

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence that the dental unit waterlines are a source of occupational and healthcare acquired infection in the dental surgery.

DATA

Transmission of infection from contaminated dental unit waterlines (DUWL) is by aerosol droplet inhalation or rarely imbibing or wound contamination in susceptible individuals. Most of the organisms isolated from DUWL are of low pathogenicity. However, data from a small number of studies described infection or colonisation in susceptible hosts with Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp. and environmental mycobacteria isolated from DUWL. The reported prevalence of legionellae in DUWL varies widely from 0 to 68%. The risk from prolonged occupational exposure to legionellae has been evaluated. Earlier studies measuring surrogate evidence of exposure to legionellae in dental personnel found a significant increase in legionella antibody levels but in recent multicentre studies undertaken in primary dental care legionellae were isolated at very low rate and the corresponding serological titres were not above background levels. Whereas, a case of fatal Legionellosis in a dental surgeon concluded that the DUWL was the likely source of the infection. The dominant species isolated from dental unit waterlines (DUWL) are Gram-negative bacteria, which are a potent source of cell wall endotoxin. A consequence of indoor endotoxin exposure is the triggering or exacerbation of asthma. Data from a single large practice-based cross-sectional study reported a temporal association between occupational exposure to contaminated DUWL with aerobic counts of >200cfu/mL at 37 degrees C and development of asthma in the sub-group of dentists in whom asthma arose following the commencement of dental training.

SOURCES

Medline 1966 to February 2007 was used to identify studies for this paper.

STUDY SELECTION

Design criteria included randomised control trials, cohort, and observational studies in English.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of published cases of infection or respiratory symptoms resulting from exposure to water from contaminated DUWL is limited, there is a medico-legal requirement to comply with potable water standards and to conform to public perceptions on water safety.

Semmelweis' present day follow-up: Updating bacterial sampling and enrichment in clinical hygiene

Potentially dangerous antibiotic resistant contaminants have permanently penetrated at least well-off western populations. The danger is so evident that some hospitals have started to refuse accepting patients who carry such bacteria. Sampling and enrichment measures in hygiene monitoring must be updated as they are corner stones in handling the problems and safeguarding the health care units. Their patients, when exposed to microorganisms are strenuous to treat. Sometimes even this fails, if the infections are spreading in weakened patients. The present review summarizes currently used technologies and the abilities of bacteria to avoid detection. Improved protocols on environmental monitoring in healthcare units are required. They should be comparable with contamination control in industries. Actually these measures in health care should be even stricter because human lives are directly endangered as the resistance of especially elderly patients is low.

Measuring the validity of two in-office water test kits

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a study to determine the validity of two commercially available in-office water test kits compared with a spread plate technique using the gold standard dehydrated culture medium R2A agar for monitoring the quality of dental treatment water.

METHODS

Over a 12-week period, one author monitored nine dental units in a dental school that each were equipped with an independent water reservoir. The author collected 351 split samples, cultured them using three test methods, counted bacterial colonies manually and assessed validity using two cutoff values: < or = 200 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) (an American Dental Association goal) and < or = 500 CFU/mL (a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] recommendation and a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] mandate).

RESULTS

Of the 351 split samples processed, the in-office test kits' accuracy ranged from 25 to 69 percent, according to the ADA and CDC/EPA recommendations, compared with the R2A agar.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the in-office test kits underestimated bacteria levels, producing inaccurate measurements of bacterial levels compared with the R2A agar.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The data suggest that use of the two in-office test kits could result in a lack of compliance, owing to underestimating bacterial contamination with recognized recommendations for dental unit waterline quality.

Detection of Legionella spp. by fluorescent in situ hybridization in dental unit waterlines

AIMS

To confirm the presence of viable Legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines (DUWL) using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and compare this method with culture approach and also to validate the utility of an enrichment to increase FISH sensitivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Water samples from 40 dental units were analysed. Three different techniques for detecting Legionella spp. were compared: (i) culture approach, (ii) direct FISH and (iii) FISH with a previous R2A medium enrichment (R2A/FISH). The FISH detection was confirmed by PCR. The use of the direct FISH does not improve significantly the detection of legionellae when compared with the culture. On the contrary, when R2A/FISH was performed, sensitivity was, respectively, two- and threefold higher than that with the direct FISH and culture approach. Using R2A/FISH, 63% of water samples analysed showed a contamination by legionellae.

CONCLUSIONS

Legionellae detection by direct FISH and R2A/FISH in dental unit water is possible but is more rapid and more sensitive (R2A/FISH) than the culture approach.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

R2A/FISH showed that several pathogens present in DUWL are viable but may not be culturable. Unlike PCR, R2A/FISH is designed to detect only metabolically active cells and therefore provides more pertinent information on infectious risk.

Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union

Water delivered by dental unit water systems (DUWS) in general dental practices can harbor high numbers of bacteria, including opportunistic pathogens. Biofilms on tubing within DUWS provide a reservoir for microorganisms and should be controlled. This study compared disinfection products for their ability to meet the American Dental Association's guideline of <200 CFU x ml(-1) for DUWS water. Alpron, BioBlue, Dentosept, Oxygenal, Sanosil, Sterilex Ultra, and Ster4Spray were tested in DUWS (n = 134) in Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Weekly water samples were tested for total viable counts (TVCs) on yeast extract agar, and, where possible, the effects of products on established biofilm (TVCs) were measured. A 4- to 5-week baseline measurement period was followed by 6 to 8 weeks of disinfection (intermittent or continuous product application). DUWS water TVCs before disinfection ranged from 0 to 5.41 log CFU x ml(-1). Disinfectants achieved reductions in the median water TVC ranging from 0.69 (Ster4Spray) to 3.11 (Dentosept) log CFU x ml(-1), although occasional high values (up to 4.88 log CFU x ml(-1)) occurred with all products. Before treatment, 64% of all baseline samples exceeded American Dental Association guidelines, compared to only 17% following commencement of treatment; where tested, biofilm TVCs were reduced to below detectable levels. The antimicrobial efficacies of products varied (e.g., 91% of water samples from DUWS treated with Dentosept or Oxygenal met American Dental Association guidelines, compared to 60% of those treated with Ster4Spray). Overall, the continuously applied products performed better than those applied intermittently. The most effective products were Dentosept and Oxygenal, although Dentosept gave the most consistent and sustained antimicrobial effect over time.

Inhibitory effect of PVDF tubes on biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines

OBJECTIVES

It has been reported that dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) are contaminated with bacterial biofilm, and that water discharged from a DUWL contains bacteria that might be opportunistic pathogens. This study aimed to investigate the ability of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) tubing to inhibit bacterial contamination in DUWLs.

METHODS

Newly installed dental units were equipped with either a conventional polyurethane tube (unit A) or a PVDF tube (unit B), and the numbers of bacteria discharged from high- and low-speed handpiece lines were counted using R2A agar plates. Bacterial attachment on surfaces was observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) up to 185 days. Bacterial outflow during 1-day clinical service from a DUWL after 1-year usage was also examined. The surface free energy of each tube was determined based on the measurement of contact angles.

RESULTS

The number of bacteria discharged from unit B was lower than from unit A at 80 days and thereafter. SEM examination demonstrated that the unit A tube was covered by biofilm constituting rods and filaments after 94 days, while no biofilm was observed in the unit B tube even after 185 days. After 1-year of usage, the unit B released significantly less bacteria than the unit A at every sampling period of 1-day clinic work. Surface free energies, calculated from contact angles measured, of PVDF and polyurethane tubes were 37.7 and 77.8, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present results indicate that PVDF tubes, which have lower surface free energy than the conventional tubes, were effective in inhibiting biofilm formation and reducing bacterial outflow from DUWLs.

Evaluation of the potential risk of occupational asthma in dentists exposed to contaminated dental unit waterlines

INTRODUCTION

Most of the organisms isolated from dental unit waterlines (DUWL) are Gram-negative bacteria, which contain cell wall endotoxin. A consequence of endotoxin exposure is the exacerbation of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the prevalence and onset of asthma among dentists and determined whether or not these were associated with the microbiological quality of DUWL in their practices.

METHODS

266 randomly selected dentists (100 from rural Northern Ireland, 166 from London) completed a health questionnaire, which included questions on prevalence and time of onset of asthma. Water samples taken from the dental handpieces and surgery washbasin cold taps in all the practices were analysed using standard techniques. The questionnaire data were evaluated using both single and multivariable logistic regression. The variables considered were: smoking; surgery location; time treating patients per week; DUWL counts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, total Pseudomonas spp., fungi, Mycobacterium spp., total aerobic colony counts (ACC) at 22 degrees C and 37 degrees C.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between any of the variables tested in dentists and a history of asthma. A subgroup analysis was performed on dentists (n=33) who reported developing asthma since they started dental training. The final multivariable model indicated that passive smoking (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.87, P=0.038) and total aerobic counts of >200 cfu/ml at 37 degrees C (OR 6.72, 95% CI 1.15-39.24, P=0.034) were significant variables for developing asthma since starting training as a dentist. ACC were significantly higher in London (P<0.0001) and London dentists were more likely to have developed asthma since they started training than their Northern Ireland counterparts (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.09-17.72, P=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the temporal onset of asthma may be associated with occupational exposure to contaminated DUWL among dentists in London and Northern Ireland.

A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a between-patient disinfection procedures to maintain low bacterial counts in dental unit water line (DUWL) effluents, and control dental water line biofilms. Six dental units already in use, that had never been cleaned, were monitored for three weeks. During the first week only baseline contamination levels were assessed with no treatment of the system. In the second week lines were flushed with water for 30 s before treating each patient. During the third week, a disinfection procedure with 0.26% peracetic acid, followed by a water flush, was implemented before treating each patient. DUWL samples were collected both at the beginning and at the end of 216 dental procedures (72 during each period), plated on R2A agar and incubated at room temperature for seven days to obtain total bacterial counts in colony forming units per millilitre. To assess biofilm control, nine dental units (five never used and four old dental units with established biofilm) were used for 30 days in routine dental practice undergoing five between-patient DUWL disinfecting cycles every day. Water line samples were removed at baseline and at the end of the study and examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the presence or absence of biofilms. A significant difference (P < 0.01) in mean DUWL bacterial counts was found between the three sets of observations. Biofilms were not present in any of the new dental units and a demonstrable reduction in the biofilms from the four dental units with previous presence of established biofilms was observed at the end of the study. In this study, a between-patient disinfection procedure consisting of flushing DUWL with peracetic acid with use of water was efficacious in the control of both microbial contamination of dental treatment water and dental water line biofilms.

Total viable counts, ATP, and endotoxin levels as potential markers of microbial contamination of dental unit water systems

OBJECTIVES

To determine if either ATP or endotoxin concentrations in water supplied by dental unit water systems (DUWS) correlated with total viable counts (TVC), and therefore could be used as a rapid, chairside measure of levels of microbial contamination.

DESIGN

A prospective trial.

METHOD

Fifty-seven water samples were taken from the 'triple spray', air rotor and source water supplies from 25 dental units in eight practices. The samples were assayed for endotoxin concentration, total ATP and TVC. A pilot study was performed to assess the relationship between TVC and total cell counts, as determined by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

ATP concentrations ranged from 22 to 958 relative light units (RLU) and free endotoxin ranged from 25 to 600 EU ml(-1). TVC varied from not detected to 2.16 x 10(4) CFU ml(-1). The ATP method proved to be a simple and rapid method that could be used at the chairside. However, there was no correlation between ATP or endotoxin concentrations and TVC in DUWS. TVC generally underestimated the total cell count by 50 to 500 fold.

CONCLUSION

Half of the water samples from DUWS exceeded recommended levels of TVC. However, ATP and endotoxin concentrations in DUWS water samples did not correlate with these TVC data and therefore could not be recommended as an alternative assay to TVC for measuring bacterial contamination or for monitoring water treatment efficacy.

Formation and Decontamination of Biofilms in Dental Unit Waterlines

BACKGROUND

Biofilms are a natural occurrence in aquatic environments, including community drinking water systems. The interior of small-diameter tubings in dental unit waterlines (DUWL) are also sites of biofilm formation. In the lumen of the tubings, the flow is minimal, and the water becomes stagnant when the units are not in use. Molecules precipitate from the water onto the interior wall and promote the adherence of planktonic microorganisms from the water. Once they become sessile, the microorganisms change their phenotype. After adherence, there is a so-called surface-associated lag time, and the organisms then enter a growth phase and produce exopolysaccharides that coat the organisms in a slime layer. Within the biofilm, the microorganisms can signal one another, transfer nutrients, and exchange genetic material. The insoluble exopolysaccharides shield the microorganisms from displacement and from penetration by predator organisms, antibiotics, and disinfectants. The external surface layer of microorganisms is faster growing and may detach as "swarmer" cells. Detachment of microorganisms from dental unit biofilm flushed into the oral cavity could theoretically infect the patient. Splatter and aerosols from dental procedures may possibly infect health care personnel.

METHODS

This study compared three DUWL cleaners (an alkaline peroxide product, a freshly mixed chlorine dioxide product, and a buffer-stabilized chlorine dioxide product) in 16 dental units with self-contained water systems, 6 months after installation in a periodontal teaching clinic. One unit treated by flushing and drying served as a control. Units were sampled daily for 10 days with heterotrophic plate count (HPC) sampler plates. The plates were incubated for 7 days at room temperature, and colonies were counted at 10.5x magnification. Samples of internal water tubing before and after the use of waterline cleaners were processed and examined by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The estimated mean HPC was derived from original and replicate independent counts of two investigators of undiluted and diluted samples, reported as colony forming units (CFU)/ml. Shock treatments with the alkaline peroxide product (n = 5) reduced the HPC from baseline, but in the ratio of daily counts to control, there was a large variance and a trend to return of high counts as days passed. The mean daily HPC was significantly better than the control for only 3 of the 9 days of treatment and exceeded the goal of 200 on 3 days. Freshly mixed chlorine dioxide (n = 4) and the buffer-stabilized chlorine dioxide (n = 5) both reduced HPC to near 0 on all days. Their ratios of daily estimated means to that of the control were significantly (P < 0.001) better at all times. In comparing treatments, the freshly mixed chlorine dioxide was better (P < 0.001) than the alkaline peroxide on 8 of 9 days. The buffered chlorine dioxide treatment was better than the alkaline peroxide at all times. The two chlorine dioxide treatments each had so many HPC counts of 0 that a meaningful statistical difference between them was not calculated. Scanning electron microscopy of plastic waterline tubing samples taken before and after treatments showed reductions in biofilm coverage, but the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Chlorine dioxide waterline cleaners are effective in decontaminating DUWL biofilm. Chlorine dioxide has advantages over other chlorine products. Controlling DUWL biofilm may have beneficial effects on nosocomial infections.

Waterborne pathogens and dental waterlines

Humans, like every other living thing on Earth, have evolved in a world dominated by many billions of microscopic life forms. Most of the time, we live in a state of harmony (or even mutualism) with our invisible coinhabitants. When this balance becomes disturbed however, the consequences can be devastating. Infectious diseases including malaria, tuberculosis, and AIDS remain the world's greatest mass murderers. Dental workers strive to reduce infection risks for their patients through infection control measures that reduce or eliminate potentially pathogenic agents in the clinical environment. As increasing numbers of patients with varying degrees of immune suppression present for dental treatment, the need to ensure an aseptic treatment environment will become a higher priority for the dental profession. The possibility that exposure to aerosols contaminated with endotoxin might exacerbate asthma or cause chronic respiratory problems in dental health care workers should be investigated. Although direct evidence of widespread complications among patients or occupationally acquired illness among dental workers is presently lacking, reducing the numbers of microorganisms present in dental treatment water is consistent with other empiric measures that form the basis of infection-control practice.

Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines

The quality of water in a dental unit is of considerable importance because patients and dental staff are regularly exposed to water and aerosol generated from the dental unit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Water samples were collected aseptically from the waterlines (reservoir, triple-syringe, high-speed) of 15 dental units. After serial dilution to 1:10(6) in APHA, the samples were seeded by the pour-plate technique and cultured in plate count agar (Difco) for 48 h at 32 degrees C. Analysis was based on the number of colony forming units (CFU). The Wilcoxon non-parametric test indicated that the levels of water contamination were highest in the triple-syringe (13 of 15) and in the high-speed (11 of 15); both levels were higher than those of the water reservoir. There was no significant statistical difference between the level of contamination in the triple-syringe and the high-speed as determined by the Mann-Whitney test [p(H0) = 40.98%; Z = - 0.2281]. Because biofilm forms on solid surfaces constantly bathed by liquid where microorganisms are present, these results indicate that the water in the dental unit may be contaminated by biofilm that forms in these tubules.

Risk assessment of dental unit waterline contamination

Biofilms form rapidly on dental unit waterlines. The majority of the organisms in the biofilm are harmless environmental species, but some dental units may harbour opportunistic respiratory pathogens. This paper describes a risk assessment approach to analysing the hazard from biofilm organisms contaminating dental unit waterlines on the respiratory health of both the dental team and patients. The health risk from the respiratory pathogens Legionella spp, Mycobacterium spp and Pseudomonads was found to be low. Nevertheless, in order to satisfy water regulations and comply with health and safety legislation dentists should institute infection-control measures to maintain the dental unit water at the standard of less than 200 colony-forming units per ml of aerobic bacteria.

Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants

Bacterial biofilm in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a widespread problem, and poses a potentially significant risk of infection to dental staff and patients, particularly those who are medically compromised or immunocompromised. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the level of bacterial contamination of dental chair unit output water in the Dublin Dental Hospital, and to investigate the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants in reducing bacterial loads to < or =200 cfu/mL as recommended by the American Dental Association. The chemical quality of dental chair unit input and output water was well within the limits recommended for potable water. Water supplied to the units yielded an average aerobic heterotrophic bacterial cell density of 184 cfu/mL. However, the corresponding density in output water was considerably higher; the average cell density in water from the three-in-one air/water syringes and cup fillers in 12 chairs was 8200 and 4300 cfu/mL, respectively. Dental unit water obtained from 18 separate reservoir-supplied units in general practices in the Dublin area yielded an average of 66000 cfu/mL. The bacterial species found were predominantly environmental organisms, which were also present at low levels in the input water. Some of the species identified (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas fluorescens) are known opportunistic pathogens. The capacity of two disinfectants, Sterilex Ultra and Sanosil, to reduce bacterial contamination to safe levels was compared. In a controlled study, once weekly overnight (15 h) disinfection using either agent reduced the bacterial density to below the American Dental Association recommended level of 200 cfu/mL. However, once disinfection ceased the bacterial loads increased to unacceptably high levels within three weeks. Electron microscopic analysis showed that both disinfectants markedly reduced biofilm in the DUWs, but the biofilm rapidly became extensive again when once weekly disinfection ceased. While both disinfectants were equally effective in lowering the bacterial counts to acceptable levels, Sterilex Ultra was associated with clogging of DUWs in some dental chair units after repeated usage, suggesting that Sanosil is a more suitable agent for routine use.

Influence of hydrodynamics and cell signaling on the structure and behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

Biofilms were grown from wild-type (WT) Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and the cell signaling lasI mutant PAO1-JP1 under laminar and turbulent flows to investigate the relative contributions of hydrodynamics and cell signaling for biofilm formation. Various biofilm morphological parameters were quantified using Image Structure Analyzer software. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that both cell signaling and hydrodynamics significantly (P < 0.000) influenced biofilm structure. In turbulent flow, both biofilms formed streamlined patches, which in some cases developed ripple-like wave structures which flowed downstream along the surface of the flow cell. In laminar flow, both biofilms formed monolayers interspersed with small circular microcolonies. Ripple-like structures also formed in four out of six WT biofilms, although their velocity was approximately 10 times less than that of those that formed in the turbulent flow cells. The movement of biofilm cell clusters over solid surfaces may have important clinical implications for the dissemination of biofilm subject to fluid shear, such as that found in catheters. The ability of the cell signaling mutant to form biofilms in high shear flow demonstrates that signaling mechanisms are not required for the formation of strongly adhered biofilms. Similarity between biofilm morphologies in WT and mutant biofilms suggests that the dilution of signal molecules by mass transfer effects in faster flowing systems mollifies the dramatic influence of signal molecules on biofilm structure reported in previous studies.

The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines

The purpose of this study was to assess water samples from a hospital dental clinic to determine whether a disinfectant/coolant irrigant containing chlorhexidine (Lines, Micrylium Laboratories) affects the presence of microbial organisms in dental unit waterlines. Water samples from three hospital dental operatories were collected at baseline and after overnight treatment with a disinfectant-containing irrigant followed by sterile water irrigation. Saliva of treated patients and sterile water rinse specimens were collected from the waterlines of these operatories for three consecutive days, then weekly for eight weeks after treatment. Specimens were cultured to identify total heterotrophic plate counts as well as presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species. Baseline organism counts varied from 10(3) to 10(5) colony-forming units per milliliter. After treatment, no organisms were detected in waterline discharge. Decontamination of dental unit waterlines is possible using a disinfectant/irrigant followed by sterile water irrigation. The potential for contamination of the lines from patients' saliva may have been reduced due to use of anti-retraction valves and the disinfectant/sterile water irrigation, as conducted in this study.

A new chemical formulation for control of dental unit water line contamination: An 'in vitro' and clinical 'study'

BACKGROUND: Water delivered by dental units during routine dental practice is highly contaminated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a new chemical solution flushed through Dental Unit Water Lines (DUWL) for the control of contamination inside dental units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six old dental units equipped with a device designed to automatically flush disinfecting solutions through the water system (Castellini Autosteril) were selected. Water samples from DUWL effluents were collected in each dental unit for 10 randomly selected days, before and after a 5 minute DUWL disinfecting cycle with TetraAcetylEthileneDiamine (TAED) and persalt (Ster4spray produced by Farmec spa, and distributed by Castellini spa). Water samples were plated in R2A Agar and cultured at room temperature for 7 days, and the total number of heterotrophic microorganisms counted and expressed in Log10 CFU/mL A general linear model was fitted and multiple regression ANOVA for repeated measures was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean contamination in DUWL effluent at baseline was 5.45 &#PlusMinus; 0.35 CFU/mL (range 4.79 to 5.93 CFU/mL). When water samples were tested "in vitro" against the chemical, no growth of heterotrophic bacteria was detected after a 5 minute contact in any of the water samples tested. After undergoing a 5 minute disinfecting cycle with the chemical, DUWL mean contamination in water effluents was 2.01 &#PlusMinus; 0.32 CFU/mL (range 1.30 to 2.74 CFU/mL) (significant difference with respect to baseline). CONCLUSIONS: An inbetween patient disinfecting procedure consisting of flushing DUWL with TAED and persalt equivalent to 0.26% peracetic acid could be useful in routine dental practice for cross-contamination control.