1
|
Weipert KF, Chasan R, Gündüz D, Roussopoulos K, Rosenbauer J, Erkapic D. Repetitive ineffective shock delivery with max 6 joules of a wearable defibrillator during ventricular fibrillation with lethal consequences. HeartRhythm Case Rep 2024; 10:341-345. [PMID: 38799597 PMCID: PMC11116955 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kay F. Weipert
- Diakonie Clinic Jung-Stilling, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Siegen, Germany
| | - Ritvan Chasan
- Diakonie Clinic Jung-Stilling, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Siegen, Germany
| | - Dursun Gündüz
- Diakonie Clinic Jung-Stilling, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Siegen, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Roussopoulos
- Diakonie Clinic Jung-Stilling, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Siegen, Germany
| | - Josef Rosenbauer
- Diakonie Clinic Jung-Stilling, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Siegen, Germany
| | - Damir Erkapic
- Diakonie Clinic Jung-Stilling, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Siegen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baddour LM, Esquer Garrigos Z, Rizwan Sohail M, Havers-Borgersen E, Krahn AD, Chu VH, Radke CS, Avari-Silva J, El-Chami MF, Miro JM, DeSimone DC. Update on Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections and Their Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases. Circulation 2024; 149:e201-e216. [PMID: 38047353 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
The American Heart Association sponsored the first iteration of a scientific statement that addressed all aspects of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection in 2010. Major advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of these infections have occurred since then, necessitating a scientific statement update. An 11-member writing group was identified and included recognized experts in cardiology and infectious diseases, with a career focus on cardiovascular infections. The group initially met in October 2022 to develop a scientific statement that was drafted with front-line clinicians in mind and focused on providing updated clinical information to enhance outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection. The current scientific statement highlights recent advances in prevention, diagnosis, and management, and how they may be incorporated in the complex care of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardelli LS, Delbaere Q, Massin F, Granier M, Casella G, Barbato G, Dupasquier V, Macia JC, Leclercq F, Pasquie JL, Roubille F. Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shortens the Lengths of Stay in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Centre Real-World Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4884. [PMID: 37568286 PMCID: PMC10419391 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) has been proven to be effective in preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients soon after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. The aim of this study was to assess whether a WCD may shorten the length of an initial hospital stay (total length, days in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the acute cardiac care unit (ACCU)) among these patients. This was a single-centre, retrospective observational study of patients referred for the management of SCD risk post-AMI and LVEF ≤35%, in a tertiary care hospital. The clinical characteristics and length of index hospitalization of the group of patients discharged, with or without WCD, were compared. A propensity score analysis was performed, then weighted regression models were conducted. A total of 101 patients in the WCD group and 29 in the control group were enrolled in the analysis. In the weighted regression models, WCD significantly reduced the days spent in ACCU (p < 0.001). WCD patients had significantly fewer days spent in ACCU (5.5 ± 2.6 vs. 8.4 ± 12.8 days, p < 0.001) and shorter hospitalizations (10.2 ± 5.7 vs. 13.4 ± 17.6 days, p = 0.005), compared with the control group. It was concluded that the WCD appears to reduce the total length of hospitalization and lengths of stay in ACCU for patients post-AMI and with left ventricular dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Quentin Delbaere
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - François Massin
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - Mathieu Granier
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - Gianni Casella
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale Maggiore, 40100 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gaetano Barbato
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale Maggiore, 40100 Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentin Dupasquier
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - Jean-Christophe Macia
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - Florence Leclercq
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - Jean-Luc Pasquie
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| | - François Roubille
- Cardiology Department, Arnaud-De-Villeneuve Hospital, 34090 Montpellier, France (F.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sławiński G, Kempa M, Przybylski A. Prevention of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Review. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2023; 24:176. [PMID: 39077520 PMCID: PMC11264162 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2406176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
The importance of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in the treatment of cardiac rhythm disturbances, heart failure, and the prevention of sudden cardiac death is indisputable. However, CIED therapy is associated with complications, among which infections are particularly unfavourable in terms of prognosis. The diagnosis and management of CIED infections remain complex, with a significant impact on mortality and healthcare costs. For these reasons, the risk factors for CIED infections and methods of their prevention have been assessed in recent years. This review summarises the current state of knowledge on the subject. We also outlined the role of alternative methods, such as subcutaneous defibrillators, leadless pacemakers, and wearable cardioverter defibrillators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz Sławiński
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
- Club 30, Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Kempa
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Andrzej Przybylski
- Medical College, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland
- Cardiology Department with the Acute Coronary Syndromes Subdivision, Clinical Provincial Hospital No 2, 35-301 Rzeszów, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reyes Dassum S, Mull HJ, Golenbock S, Lamkin RP, Epshtein I, Shin MH, Strymish JM, Blumenthal KG, Colborn K, Branch-Elliman W. A Novel Informatics Tool to Detect Periprocedural Antibiotic Allergy Adverse Events for Near Real-time Surveillance to Support Audit and Feedback. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2313964. [PMID: 37195660 PMCID: PMC10193175 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Standardized processes for identifying when allergic-type reactions occur and linking reactions to drug exposures are limited. Objective To develop an informatics tool to improve detection of antibiotic allergic-type events. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2019, with data analyzed between July 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022. The study was conducted across Veteran Affairs hospitals among patients who underwent cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures and received periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis. The cohort was split into training and test cohorts, and cases were manually reviewed to determine presence of allergic-type reaction and its severity. Variables potentially indicative of allergic-type reactions were selected a priori and included allergies entered in the Veteran Affair's Allergy Reaction Tracking (ART) system (either historical [reported] or observed), allergy diagnosis codes, medications administered to treat allergic reactions, and text searches of clinical notes for keywords and phrases indicative of a potential allergic-type reaction. A model to detect allergic-type reaction events was iteratively developed on the training cohort and then applied to the test cohort. Algorithm test characteristics were assessed. Exposure Preprocedural and postprocedural prophylactic antibiotic administration. Main Outcomes and Measures Antibiotic allergic-type reactions. Results The cohort of 36 344 patients included 34 703 CIED procedures with antibiotic exposures (mean [SD] age, 72 [10] years; 34 008 [98%] male patients); median duration of postprocedural prophylaxis was 4 days (IQR, 2-7 days; maximum, 45 days). The final algorithm included 7 variables: entries in the Veteran Affair's hospitals ART, either historic (odds ratio [OR], 42.37; 95% CI, 11.33-158.43) or observed (OR, 175.10; 95% CI, 44.84-683.76); PheCodes for "symptoms affecting skin" (OR, 8.49; 95% CI, 1.90-37.82), "urticaria" (OR, 7.01; 95% CI, 1.76-27.89), and "allergy or adverse event to an antibiotic" (OR, 11.84, 95% CI, 2.88-48.69); keyword detection in clinical notes (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.27-8.08); and antihistamine administration alone or in combination (OR, 6.51; 95% CI, 1.90-22.30). In the final model, antibiotic allergic-type reactions were identified with an estimated probability of 30% or more; positive predictive value was 61% (95% CI, 45%-76%); and sensitivity was 87% (95% CI, 70%-96%). Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis, an algorithm with a high sensitivity to detect incident antibiotic allergic-type reactions that can be used to provide clinician feedback about antibiotic harms from unnecessarily prolonged antibiotic exposures was developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Reyes Dassum
- Department of Infectious Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hillary J. Mull
- Center for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samuel Golenbock
- Center for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebecca P. Lamkin
- Center for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Isabella Epshtein
- Center for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marlena H. Shin
- Center for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Judith M. Strymish
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly G. Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Westyn Branch-Elliman
- Center for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Osorio J, Mansour M, Melby D, Imhoff RJ, Hunter TD, Maccioni S, Wei T, Natale A. Economic Evaluation of Contact Force Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in the United States. Heart Rhythm O2 2022; 3:647-655. [PMID: 36589917 PMCID: PMC9795304 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, and it increases the risk of stroke, heart failure, and other cardiac complications. Catheter ablation is well-established as a treatment for paroxysmal AF, and the recent PRECEPT (Prospective Review of the Safety and Effectiveness of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF Catheter Evaluated for Treating Symptomatic Persistent AF) clinical trial resulted in the catheter gaining approval for the treatment of persistent AF in the United States. Objectives To construct an economic simulation model, based on the results of the PRECEPT trial, to monetize the impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) compared with medical therapy (MT). Methods Cost-offset and break-even analyses were performed to assess the economic impact of RFCA vs MT for adult persistent AF patients. Three perspectives were considered: commercial payers, Medicare, and self-insured employers. A cohort-level decision tree model was developed and validated in TreeAge Pro 2019. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the robustness of findings. Results For all 3 types of payer, RFCA had a higher initial cost compared with MT. However, reductions in health care utilization after ablation, driven by decreased cardiovascular hospitalizations, led to an annual cost offset of between $5037 and $8402 after the first year. Projecting this forward resulted in an estimated cost break-even after 5.9, 4.2, and 5.1 years for commercial payers, Medicare, and self-insured employers, respectively. Conclusion In addition to providing clinical benefits, RFCA may be a valuable economic investment for U.S. payers, substantially reducing utilization after the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Osorio
- Arrhythmia Institute at Grandview, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Daniel Melby
- Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ryan J. Imhoff
- Real-World Evidence, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, Kentucky
- Address reprint requests and correspondence: Mr Ryan J. Imhoff, Real World Evidence, CTI Clinical Trial & Consulting Services, 100 East Rivercenter Boulevard, Covington, KY 41011.
| | - Tina D. Hunter
- Real-World Evidence, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, Kentucky
| | - Sonia Maccioni
- Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Johnson & Johnson, Irvine, California
| | - Tom Wei
- Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Johnson & Johnson, Irvine, California
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mueller-Leisse J, Brunn J, Zormpas C, Hohmann S, Hillmann HAK, Eiringhaus J, Bauersachs J, Veltmann C, Duncker D. Delayed Improvement of Left Ventricular Function in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure Depends on Etiology-A PROLONG-II Substudy. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:2037. [PMID: 35271182 PMCID: PMC8914738 DOI: 10.3390/s22052037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), three months of optimal therapy are recommended before considering a primary preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear which patients benefit from a prolonged waiting period under protection of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) to avoid unnecessary ICD implantations. This study included all patients receiving a WCD for newly diagnosed HFrEF (n = 353) at our center between 2012 and 2017. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. From baseline until three months, LVEF improved in patients with all peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Beyond this time, LVEF improved in PPCM and DCM only (10 ± 8% and 10 ± 12%, respectively), whereas patients with ICM showed no further improvement. The patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF were compared to 29 patients with a distinct WCD indication, which is an explantation of an infected ICD. This latter group had a higher incidence of WCD shocks and poorer overall survival. All-cause mortality should be considered when deciding on WCD prescription. In patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF, the potential for delayed LVEF recovery should be considered when timing ICD implantation, especially in patients with PPCM and DCM.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is a novel tool that may be of interest in situations with atransient risk of sudden cardiac death. It offers a temporary and easy to remove protection against malignant ventricular arrhythmias. In this review, the authors describe evidence in literature and different international guidelines and consensus. AREAS COVERED The authors searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, and Google Scholar for relevant studies and comments. EXPERT OPINION If a WCD is indicated, the observance must be as perfect as possible. Thus, patients need proper education in wearing the WCD.The temporary use of a WCD is reasonable in patients with a high risk for SCD, even with a low level of evidence with only one randomized clinical trial (VEST), as its disadvantages are limited to a transitory impairment in quality of life and a low risk of inappropriate shock.Indications are now well accepted: ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF below 35% before reassessment, recent onset of NICM or presumed myocarditis with LVEF ≤35% before reassessment, after ICD explant until reimplantation (e.g. infection), and bridge to transplant.Future guidelines on WCD in the prevention of SCD may be warranted to harmonize clinical practice especially in debated indications..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Bodin
- Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - Arnaud Bisson
- Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - Laurent Fauchier
- Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kandi V, Vadakedath S. Implant-Associated Infections: A Review of the Safety of Cardiac Implants. Cureus 2020; 12:e12267. [PMID: 33520485 PMCID: PMC7834584 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiac implantations are among the most critical, and life-saving patient management procedures. Most cardiac implantations are performed to correct abnormalities in the conduction and the rhythm of the heart. Because the implants are intended for long-term use ranging from months to years, the failure of an implant is considered a major setback both in the patients as well as surgeons' perspectives. Implant failures can have multifactorial reasons, amongst which infectious causes need to be adequately addressed. This review attempts to evaluate the nature of implants, etiology, predisposing factors, infection control, and preventive strategies for cardiac implant-associated infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkataramana Kandi
- Clinical Microbiology, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, IND
| | | |
Collapse
|