REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA IN THORACIC AND ABDOMINAL SURGERY

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Combined Segmental Thoracic Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgeries and Laparoscopic Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Background

Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (SA) may be a good alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures, especially in high-risk patients.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of thoracic segmental SA vs GA during abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures.

Methods

This study was conducted at our university hospital and involved a total of 46 patients who underwent abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures. The study period spanned from January 15, 2022, to October 15, 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 23) received standard GA, and group 2 (n = 23) received thoracic segmental SA. A combination of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 25 μg of fentanyl was injected through the spinal needle. The epidural catheter was then threaded through the Tuohy needle after withdrawal of the spinal needle to keep only 4 cm up in the epidural space. Demographic data, both intra and postoperative hemodynamic parameters, were monitored. Postoperatively, pain in both groups was treated with intravenous (IV) morphine by patient controlled analgesia (PCA), PCA settings were 1 mg morphine/mL, no background infusion, bolus dose 2 mL and lockout interval 15 min. Postoperative, both resting VAS and VAS during cough were measured for all patients at fixed intervals, and all patients were followed up for postoperative complications.

Results

No significant variation was found in demographic data. Intra and postoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measurements were higher in group 1 than in group 2 but without a statistically significant difference (P < 0.029). Early postoperative VAS values and discharge time from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were significantly reduced in group 2 than in group 1 (P < 0.001). The number of patients asked for analgesia and total opioid consumption were substantially reduced in group 2 than in group 1. Also, the time of the first analgesia request and patient satisfaction were substantially greater in group 2 than in group 1.

Conclusions

Combined thoracic spinal/epidural block results in stable hemodynamics, longer postoperative analgesia with fewer side effects, and greater surgeon and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures.

A Novel Opioid-Sparing Analgesia Following Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Non-Inferiority Trial

Purpose

This randomized, non-inferiority study aimed to observe the feasibility of opioid-sparing analgesia based on modified intercostal nerve block (MINB) following thoracoscopic surgery.

Patients and Methods

60 patients scheduled for single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomized to the intervention group or control group. After MINB was performed in both groups at the end of the surgery, the intervention group received patient controlled-intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dexmedetomidine 0.05 µg/kg/h for 72 h after surgery, and the control group received conventional PCIA of sufentanil 3 µg/kg for 72 h. The primary outcome was a visual analog scale (VAS) on coughing 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the time to first analgesic request, pressing times of PCIA, time to first flatus, and hospital stay.

Results

There was no difference in the cough-VAS at 24 h (median [interquartile range]) between the intervention group [3 (2-4)] and control group [3 (2-4), P = 0.36]. The median difference (95% CI) in the cough-VAS at 24 h was [0 (0 to 1), P = 0.36]. There was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request, pressing times of PCIA, and hospital stay between groups (P > 0.05). A significant decrease in time to first flatus was observed in the intervention group (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Opioid-sparing analgesia provided safe and analogous postoperative analgesia with a shortened time to first flatus, compared with sufentanil-based analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery. This might be a novel method recommended for thoracoscopic surgery.

The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Intercostal nerve block (ICNB) is a very effective analgesic method. We aimed to explore the effect of preemptive analgesia with ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

126 patients, aged 18-70 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II and scheduled for thoracoscopic pulmonary resection were enrolled in this study. 119 patients were left for final analysis. Patients were randomly allocated to group ICNB and group CONTROL. Patients in CONTROL group were administered sufentanil with patient-controlled analgesia device after operation In group ICNB, patients received ropivacaine ICNB prior to surgery and patient-controlled analgesia device after operation. The primary outcome is visual analog scale pain score (VAS) at rest at 0,4, 8,16,24,48,72 and 168 h postoperatively and they were compared. Surgical outcomes and rescue analgesia requirement were also recorded.

RESULTS

VAS scores were statistically significantly lower for ICNB group compared to control group at 0, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. The duration of insertion of chest tube in ICBN group was shorter than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (4.69 ± 2.14 vs. 5.67 ± 2.86, P = 0.036). The postoperative hospital stay, incidence of nausea and vomiting and postoperative pulmonary infection rate in ICBN group were all lower than those in the control group, but there were no statistical differences. The frequency of rescue analgesia during 48 postoperative hours was different between the two groups (ICNB vs. Control; 9.83% vs. 31.03%, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery, ultrasound-guided ICNB is simple, safe, and effective for providing acute postoperative pain management during the early postoperative stage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese clinical trials: chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900021017. Registred on 25/01/2019.

Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Combined with General Anaesthesia or General Anaesthesia Alone for Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Monocentric Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To investigate, in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, the effects of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (UG-QLB) combined with general anaesthesia (GA) on the postoperative recovery compared with GA alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retrospective study enrolled 231 patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, including 119 patients who received UG-QLB combined with GA (Group QG), and 112 patients undergoing GA alone (Group GA). The primary endpoint was the postoperative 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were the average visual analogue scale (VAS) scores within 48 h after surgery, the first time of postoperative ambulation, the first time of flatus, postoperative hospitalization, perioperative opioid requirement and adverse effects after surgery.

RESULTS

UG-QLB combined with GA did not affect the 3-year RFS in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (HR 0.659, 95% CI 0.342-1.269, P=0.212). However, the VAS ranking analysis implicated that it could significantly alleviate the postoperative pain in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy patients (P<0.01). In addition, it dramatically facilitated the early recovery of postoperative ambulation and flatus, while shortening the duration of postoperative hospitalization (P<0.01). The most important was it could remarkably reduce the opioid consumption (P<0.01), which in the meanwhile, reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Although UG-QLB combined with GA did not improve the 3-year RFS for patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, it could provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief, reduce opioid consumption and adverse effects, which subsequently facilitates postoperative early rehabilitation.

Postoperative analgesia efficacy of erector spinae plane block in adult abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objectives

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used for many thoracic and abdominal surgeries. However, evidence of its analgesic efficacy following abdominal surgery, compared with that of thoracic analgesia, is insufficient. Our study explored the analgesic effect of ESPB after abdominal surgery.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Primary outcomes were pain scores at 6, 12 and 24 h and 24-h opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, length of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for primary outcomes and mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs for secondary outcomes.

Results

We systematically included 1,502 cases in 24 trials. Compared with placebo, ESPB significantly reduced pain scores at 6 h (SMD -1.25; 95% CI -1.79 to -0.71), 12 h (SMD -0.85; 95% CI -1.33 to -0.37) and 24 h (SMD -0.84; 95% CI -1.30 to -0.37) and 24-h opioid consumption (SMD -0.62; 95% CI -1.19 to -0.06) post-surgery. ESPB prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia and decreased the incidence of PONV. Compared with transversus abdominal plane block (TAPB), ESPB significantly reduced pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h and 24-h opioid consumption and prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia postsurgically. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that ESPB significantly reduced pain scores at various time points and opioid consumption within 24 h after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and bariatric surgery.

Conclusion

Compared with placebo, ESPB improves the postoperative analgesic efficacy after abdominal surgery. Furthermore, our meta-analysis confirmed that ESPB provides more beneficial analgesic efficacy than TAPB.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/301491_STRATEGY_20220104.pdf], identifier [CRD42022301491].

Systemic inflammatory changes and their clinical implications following thoracic cancer surgery

Trauma that follows every surgical procedure triggers an inflammatory response, which in the majority of the cases reflects the associated tissue damage. Tissue regeneration, postoperative outcomes, and systemic antibacterial activity are highly dependent on the initial inflammatory response elicited by surgical trauma. More specifically, in thoracic surgery, systemic cytokine and cellular changes have an impact on several measured postoperative outcomes. Lastly, the introduction of video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery has been shown to provide improved postoperative outcomes with altered systemic inflammatory response, when compared to open thoracic surgery. This review outlines the major systemic inflammatory changes observed in thoracic cancer surgery as well as its clinical significance.

Ultrasound-guided paravertebral blockade reduced perioperative opioids requirement in pancreatic resection: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Perioperative opioid use for pain control has been found to be associated with side effects and adverse prognosis. In this study, we hypothesized that paravertebral block could reduce the consumption of opioids during pancreatic resection surgery.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, randomized trial. Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: those who received bilateral paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia [bilateral paravertebral blockade (PTB) group] or those who received only general anesthesia (Control group). The primary endpoint was the perioperative consumption of opioids (sufentanil and remifentanil). The main secondary endpoints were pain scores, complications, and serum cytokine levels.

Results

A total of 153 patients were enrolled in the study and 119 cases were analyzed. Compared to the control group, patients in PTB patients had significantly lower perioperative (30.81 vs. 56.17 µg), and intraoperative (9.58 vs. 33.67 µg) doses of sufentanil (both p &lt; 0.001). Numerical rating scale scores of pain were comparable between the two groups. No statistical differences in complications were detected.

Conclusion

Bilateral paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia reduced the perioperative consumption of opioids by 45%.

Registration number

ChiCTR1800020291 (available on http://www.chictr.org.cn/).

A Bioinformatics Study of Ropivacaine plus Dexamethasone Prolonging the Duration of Nerve Block

The study focuses on the potential function of dexamethasone on ropivacaine in sciatic nerve blocks. Nine Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into three groups: normal group (NG), control group (CG), and experimental group (EG), with three rats in each group. The CG was injected with diluted ropivacaine (0.5% concentration); the EG was injected with a diluted ropivacaine+dexamethasone mixture, and the NG was injected with an equal amount of saline. The sciatic nerve in the thigh was collected for sequencing two days after injection in each group. Differential analysis was performed for NG-vs-CG, NG-vs-EG, and CG-vs-EG based on the sequencing dataset. The modular genes associated with ropivacaine and ropivacaine+ dexamethasone were screened by weighted coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), differentially expressed modules among them were enriched for analysis, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed to observe high and low expression among key genes in immune cells. Twenty-two and three differential genes associated with ropivacaine (green-yellow module) and ropivacaine+dexamethasone (palevioletred3 module) were acquired, respectively, which played important roles in biological processes such as erythrocyte homeostasis, erythroid differentiation, and hemoglobin metabolic processes. PPI revealed that AHSP, ALAS2, EPB42, HBB, and SLC4A1 were interacting and the expression of these five genes was upregulated in the CG compared with the NG, while the expression of them was downregulated in the EG compared with the CG. The immunological analysis also showed significant differences in the expression of various immune cells in the 3 groups. AHSP, ALAS2, EPB42, HBB, and SLC4A1 are genes associated with hemoglobin, and dexamethasone combined with ropivacaine may prolong anesthesia by affecting local vasoconstriction to some extent.

Use of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Plane Blocks in Anterior and Lateral Thoracic Wall Region as Safe Method for Patient Anesthesia and Analgesia: Review of Techniques and Approaches during COVID-19 Pandemic

Ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks performed on the anterior and lateral thoracic wall have become an important adjuvant method to general anesthesia and an independent method of local anesthesia and pain management. These procedures diminish the harmful effects of anesthesia on respiratory function and reduce the risk of phrenic nerve paralysis or iatrogenic pneumothorax. In postoperative pain management, interfascial plane blocks decrease the dosage of intravenous drugs, including opioids. They can also eliminate the complications associated with general anesthesia when used as the sole method of anesthesia for surgical procedures. The following procedures are classified as interfascial plane blocks of the anterior and lateral thoracic wall: pectoral nerve plane block (PECS), serratus anterior plane block (SAP), transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTP), pectoral interfascial plane block (PIF), and intercostal nerve block (ICNB). These blocks are widely used in emergency medicine, oncologic surgery, general surgery, thoracic surgery, cardiac surgery, orthopedics, cardiology, nephrology, oncology, palliative medicine, and pain medicine. Regional blocks are effective for analgesic treatment, both as an anesthesia procedure for surgery on the anterior and lateral thoracic wall and as an analgesic therapy after trauma or other conditions that induce pain in this area. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks are safe alternatives for anesthesia in patients with symptoms of respiratory distress related to SARS-CoV-2 and appear to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection among medical personnel.

Utilization of Supplemental Regional Anesthesia in Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in the United States: A Retrospective Study

Background

Pulmonary lobectomy is the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. This study investigated the rate of utilization of supplemental anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open lobectomy using a national database and assessed the effect of regional block (RB) on postoperative outcomes.

Methods

Patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer between 2014–2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The patients’ primary mode of anesthesia and supplemental anesthesia were recorded. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 2 surgical groups those who underwent general anesthesia (GA) alone versus GA with RB. Multivariable regression analyses were performed on the outcomes of interest.

Results

In total, 13,578 patients met the study criteria, with 87% undergoing GA and the remaining 13% receiving GA and RB. The use of neuraxial anesthesia decreased over the years, while RB use increased up to 20% in 2019. Age, body mass index, and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between groups. Patients who underwent VATS were more likely to receive RB than those who underwent thoracotomy. RB was most often utilized by thoracic surgeons. An adjusted analysis showed that RB use was associated with shorter hospital stays and a reduced likelihood of prolonged length of stay, but a higher rate of surgical site infections (SSIs).

Conclusion

In a large surgical database, there was underutilization of supplemental anesthesia in patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer. RB utilization was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and an increase in SSI incidence.

Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined with General Anaesthesia or General Anaesthesia Alone for Thoracoscopic Lung Adenocarcinoma Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anaesthesia or general anaesthesia alone for thoracoscopic lung adenocarcinoma surgery, and to provide new thoughts for improving the clinical outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. Data were retrieved for 195 patients with lung adenocarcinoma undergoing elective radical lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopy between January 2018 and August 2019 in The Second Hospital of Shandong University, including 86 patients who received thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) combined with general anaesthesia (group TG), and 109 patients who received general anaesthesia alone (group GA). All patients were given self-controlled intravenous analgesia pump for 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome was the recurrence-free survival 2 years postoperatively (the time between surgery and the earliest date of recurrence, metastasis or lung cancer-cause death). The secondary outcomes included the average numeric rating scale (NRS) scores within 48 h postoperatively, the first time of postoperative ambulation, duration of chest tube drainage, length of postoperative hospitalization, perioperative opioid consumption and the postoperative side effects.

Results

There were no statistical differences in the recurrence-free survival 2 years postoperatively between groups (Multivariate hazard ratio 0.706, 95% CI 0.126–3.941, P=0.691). The average NRS scores within 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in group TG (P<0.05). The first time of postoperative ambulation, duration of chest tube drainage, and length of postoperative hospitalization in group TG were significantly reduced (P<0.05). Opioid consumption was significantly decreased in group TG (P<0.01). Finally, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in group TG (P<0.05).

Conclusion

TPVB for thoracoscopic lung adenocarcinoma surgery did not improve the recurrence-free survival 2 years postoperatively compared with general anaesthesia alone, but it significantly enhanced the postoperative analgesia effect, reduced opioid consumption as well as side effects, and accelerated postoperative early recovery.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-2100050454).

Propofol regulates miR-1-3p/IGF1 axis to inhibit the proliferation and accelerates apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells

This study aimed to clarify the mechanism of propofol on proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) cell. SW620 and HCT15 cells were exposed to different concentrations of propofol, the proliferation and apoptotic rate, were measured by MTT, colony formation and flow cytometry assays, respectively. The expressions of miR-1-3p and insulin-like growth factors 1 (IGF1) were examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Western bolt was employed to quantify the protein levels of IGF1 and apoptotic proteins. The molecular interaction between miR-1-3p and IGF1 was validated using dual-luciferase reporter assay. A xenograft tumor model was established to further assess the effects of propofol on CRC in vivo. Propofol dramatically decreased the proliferation and elevated apoptotic rate of CRC cells. RT-qPCR assay demonstrated that miR-1-3p was downregulated in CRC cells, and could be strikingly increased by propofol. Importantly, miR-1-3p inhibited IGF-1 expression through interacting with its 3'-UTR region, thus inactivating AKT/mTOR signals. Gain or loss of functional study revealed that miR-1-3p downregulation remarkedly diminished the anti-tumor roles of propofol by directly inhibiting IGF1. In vivo study showed that propofol inhibited tumor growth by regulating miR-1-3p/IGF1 axis. Our data eventually elucidated that propofol suppressed CRC progression by promoting miR-1-3p which targeted IGF1. These results might provide a scientific basis for the application of propofol on the clinical surgery and the prognosis of patients with CRC.

ANALGESIC EFFECT OF TRAMADOL IS NOT ALTERED BY POSTOPERATIVE SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION AFTER MAJOR ABDOMINAL SURGERY

Tramadol is a commonly used analgesic in intensive care units (ICUs) for acute postoperative pain. Conversion of tramadol into active metabolites may be impaired in inflammatory states. Catechol-O-methyltransferase may influence pain. The aim of the study was to examine differences in the analgesic effect of tramadol between ICU patients with and without signs of systemic inflammation. Forty-three patients were admitted to ICU after a major abdominal surgery. The patients received a dose of 100 mg of tramadol intravenously every 6 hours during the first 24 hours after surgical procedure. Pain scores were measured by the Numeric Rating Scale before and 30 minutes after tramadol administration in awake patients. Systemic inflammation was considered when at least two of the following postoperative parameters were present in the first 24 hours of ICU admission: fever or hypothermia, tachycardia, pCO₂ <4.3 kPa, white blood cells >12000/mm³ or <4000/mm³, or preoperative value of C-reactive protein (CRP) >50 mg/L or/and procalcitonin (PCT) >0.5 mg/L. Catechol-O-methyltransferase was analyzed postoperatively. Fifteen (34.8%) patients met the criteria for systemic inflammation. Tramadol was proven to be an effective analgesic for the treatment of postoperative pain regardless of the presence of systemic inflammation (p<0.05). Lower perception of pain before tramadol application was observed in patients with systemic inflammation, but the difference was not significant. A negative correlation was observed between the preoperative values of CRP and PCT and the analgesic effect of tramadol assessed at the second measurement point (r=-0.358, p=0.03, and r=-0.364, p=0.02, respectively). Catechol-O-methyltransferase variants were not in correlation with pain and opioid consumption. Based on our findings, tramadol is effective in lowering pain scores after major abdominal surgery irrespective of the presence of systemic inflammation.

Effectiveness of Pain Control of Local Anaesthetic Wound Infusion Following Elective Midline Laparotomy: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pain control is an important pillar in enhanced recovery after surgery. There is a paucity of data that compares efficacy of pain control between continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion and thoracic epidural analgesia in elective midline laparotomy patients OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain control between continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion and thoracic epidural analgesia in elective laparotomy patients.

DESIGN

A randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.

POPULATION

Patients underwent elective laparotomy.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients scheduled for elective laparotomy were randomized into two equal groups to receive either continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion or thoracic epidural analgesia. Data on the baseline patient characteristics, total morphine consumption at 72 h, visual analogue scores and rates of adverse effects were collected.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the participants were similar. Continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion was equivalent to thoracic epidural analgesia in terms of pain scores and total morphine consumption at 72 h. Duration of hospital stay was shorter in the intervention arm. There were more surgical site infections in the intervention arm, while catheter dislodgement rate was higher in the thoracic epidural arm.

CONCLUSION

Continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion is equivalent to thoracic epidural analgesia in management of post-operative pain following elective midline laparotomy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Pan African Clinical Trial registry, number PACTR201808607220790.