Measurements of deposited aerosol dose in infants and small children

Dos and don'ts to optimize transnasal aerosol drug delivery in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Transnasal aerosol drug delivery has become widely accepted for treating acutely ill infants, children, and adults. More recently aerosol administration to wider populations receiving high and low-flow nasal oxygen has become common practice.

AREAS COVERED

Skepticism of insufficient aerosol delivery to the lungs has been tempered by multiple in vitro explorations of variables to optimize delivery efficiency. Additionally, clinical studies demonstrated comparable clinical responses to orally inhaled aerosols. This paper provides essential clinical guidance on how to improve transnasal aerosol delivery based on device-, settings-, and drug-related optimization to serve as a resource for educational initiatives and quality enhancement endeavors at healthcare institutions.

EXPERT OPINION

Transnasal aerosol delivery is proliferating worldwide, but indiscriminate use of excessive-high flows, poor selection and placement of aerosol devices and circuits can greatly reduce aerosol delivery and efficacy, potentially compromising treatment to acute and critically ill patients. Attention to these details can improve inhaled dose by an order of magnitude, making the difference between effective treatment and the progression to more invasive ventilatory support, with greater inherent risk and cost. These revelations have prompted specific recommendations for optimal delivery, driving advancements in aerosol generators, formulations, and future device designs to administer aerosols and maximize treatment effectiveness.

Upper Airway Alarmin Cytokine Expression in Asthma of Different Severities

Background: The secretion of alarmin cytokines by epithelial cells, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)-25, and IL-33, initiates inflammatory cascades in asthma. However, alarmin cytokine expression in the upper airways in asthma remains largely unknown. Methods: We recruited 40 participants with asthma into four groups as per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps (10 in each group of GINA 1/2, 3, 4, and 5). Cells were derived from nasal, buccal, and throat brushings. Intracellular cytokine expression (TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33) was assessed by flow cytometry in cytokeratin 8+ (Ck8+) epithelial cells immediately following collection. Results: TSLP was significantly increased (p < 0.001) in GINA 5 patients across nasal, buccal, and throat Ck8+ epithelial cells, while IL-25 was elevated in nasal and throat samples (p < 0.003), and IL-33 levels were variable, compared with GINA 1-4 patients. Individual GINA subgroup comparison showed that TSLP levels in nasal samples from GINA 5 patients were significantly (p = 0.03) elevated but did not differ between patients with and without nasal comorbidities. IL-25 and IL-33 (obtained from nasal, buccal, and throat samples) were not significantly different in individual groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates for the first time that Ck8+ nasal epithelial cells from GINA 5 asthma patients express elevated levels of TSLP.

Tracheomalacia Reduces Aerosolized Drug Delivery to the Lung

Rationale: Neonates with respiratory issues are frequently treated with aerosolized medications to manage lung disease or facilitate airway clearance. Dynamic tracheal collapse (tracheomalacia [TM]) is a common comorbidity in these patients, but it is unknown whether the presence of TM alters the delivery of aerosolized drugs. Objectives: To quantify the effect of neonatal TM on the delivery of aerosolized drugs. Methods: Fourteen infant subjects with respiratory abnormalities were recruited; seven with TM and seven without TM. Respiratory-gated 3D ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was acquired covering the central airway and lungs. For each subject, a computational fluid dynamics simulation modeled the airflow and particle transport in the central airway based on patient-specific airway anatomy, motion, and airflow rates derived from MRI. Results: Less aerosolized drug reached the distal airways in subjects with TM than in subjects without TM: of the total drug delivered, less particle mass passed through the main bronchi in subjects with TM compared with subjects without TM (33% vs. 47%, p = 0.013). In subjects with TM, more inhaled particles were deposited on the surface of the airway (48% vs. 25%, p = 0.003). This effect becomes greater with larger particle sizes and is significant for particles with a diameter >2 μm (2-5 μm, p ≤ 0.025 and 5-15 μm, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Neonatal patients with TM receive less aerosolized drug delivered to the lungs than subjects without TM. Currently, infants with lung disease and TM may not be receiving adequate and/or expected medication. Particles >2 μm in diameter are likely to deposit on the surface of the airway due to anatomical constrictions such as reduced tracheal and glottal cross-sectional area in neonates with TM. This problem could be alleviated by delivering smaller aerosolized particles.

Influence of mesh nebulizer characteristics on aerosol delivery in non-human primates

Non-Human Primates (NHPs) are particularly relevant for preclinical studies during the development of inhaled biologics. However, aerosol inhalation in NHPs is difficult to evaluate due to a low lung deposition fraction and high variability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of mesh nebulizer parameters to improve lung deposition in macaques. We developed a humidified heated and ventilated anatomical 3D printed macaque model of the upper respiratory tract to reduce experiments with animals. The model was compared to in vivo deposition using 2D planar scintigraphy imaging in NHPs and demonstrated good predictivity. Next, the anatomical model was used to evaluate the position of the nebulizer on the mask, the aerosol particle size and the aerosol flow rate on the lung deposition. We showed that placing the mesh-nebulizer in the upper part of the mask and in proximal position to the NHP improved lung delivery prediction. The lower the aerosol size and the lower the aerosol flow rate, the better the predicted aerosol deposition. In particular, for 4.3 ± 0.1 µm in terms of volume mean diameter, we obtained 5.6 % ± 0.2 % % vs 19.2 % ± 2.5 % deposition in the lung model for an aerosol flow rate of 0.4 mL/min vs 0.03 mL/min and achieved 16 % of the nebulizer charge deposited in the lungs of macaques. Despite the improvement of lung deposition efficiency in macaques, its variability remained high (6-21 %).

A Pediatric Upper Airway Library to Evaluate Interpatient Variability of In Silico Aerosol Deposition

The airway of pediatric patients' changes through development, presenting a challenge in developing pediatric-specific aerosol therapeutics. Our work aims to quantify geometric variations and aerosol deposition patterns during upper airway development in subjects between 3.5 months-6.9 years old using a library of 24 pediatric models and 4 adult models. Computational fluid-particle dynamics was performed with varying particle size (0.1-10 μm) and flow rate (10-120 Lpm), which was rigorously analyzed to compare anatomical metrics (epiglottis angle (θE), glottis to cricoid ring ratio (GC-ratio), and pediatric to adult trachea ratio (H-ratio)), inhaler metrics (particle diameter, [Formula: see text], and flow rate, Q), and clinical metrics (age, sex, height, and weight) against aerosol deposition. Multivariate non-linear regression indicated that all metrics were all significantly influential on resultant deposition, with varying influence of individual parameters. Additionally, principal component analysis was employed, indicating that [Formula: see text], Q, GC-ratio, θE, and sex accounted for 90% of variability between subject-specific deposition. Notably, age was not statistically significant among pediatric subjects but was influential in comparing adult subjects. Inhaler design metrics were hugely influential, thus supporting the critical need for pediatric-specific inhalable approaches. This work not only improves accuracy in prescribing inhalable therapeutics and informing pediatric aerosol optimization, but also provides a framework for future aerosol studies to continue to strive toward optimized and personalized pediatric medicine.

A path forward in the development of new aerosol drug delivery devices for pediatrics

Inhaled medications are widely accepted as being the optimal route for treating pediatric respiratory diseases, a leading cause of hospitalization and death. Despite jet nebulizers being the preferred inhalation device for neonates and infants, current devices face performance issues with most of the drug never reaching the target lung location. Previous work has aimed to improve pulmonary drug deposition, yet nebulizer efficiency remains low. The development of an inhalant therapy that is efficacious and safe for pediatrics depends on a well-designed delivery system and formulation. To accomplish this, the field needs to rethink the current practice of basing pediatric treatments on adult studies. The rapidly evolving pediatric patient (i.e. neonates to eighteen) needs to be considered because they are different from adults with respect to airway anatomy, breathing patterns, and adherence. Previous research approaches to improve deposition efficiency have been limited due to the complexity of combining physics, which drives aerosol transport and deposition, and biology, especially within the area of pediatrics. To address these critical knowledge gaps, we need a better understanding of how patient age and disease state affect deposition of aerosolized drugs. The complexity of the multiscale respiratory system makes scientific investigation very challenging. The authors have simplified the complex problem into five components with these three areas as ones to address first: how the aerosol is (i) generated in a medical device, (ii) delivered to the patient, and (iii) deposited inside the lung. In this review, we discuss the technological advances and innovations made from experiments, simulations, and predictive models in each of these areas. In addition, we discuss the impact on patient treatment efficacy and recommend a clinical direction, with a focus on pediatrics. In each area, a series of research questions are posed and steps for future research to improve efficacy in aerosol drug delivery are outlined.

Aerosolized drug delivery in awake and anesthetized children to treat bronchospasm

Bronchospasm is a common respiratory adverse event in pediatric anesthesia. First-line treatment commonly includes inhaled salbutamol. This review focuses on the current best practice to deliver aerosolized medications to awake as well as anesthetized pediatric patients and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various administration techniques. Additionally, we detail the differences between various airway devices used in anesthesia. We highlight the unmet need for innovation of orally inhaled drug products to deliver aerosolized medications during pediatric respiratory critical events such as bronchospasm. It is therefore important that clinicians remain up to date with the best clinical practice for aerosolized drug delivery in order to prevent and efficiently treat pediatric patients experiencing life-threatening respiratory emergencies.