XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term effectiveness and safety of XEN45 in open-angle glaucoma patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate the long-term effectiveness and safety of XEN45 implant, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

METHODS

Retrospective and single center study conducted on consecutive OAG patients who underwent a XEN45 implant between February-2017 and December-2021. The primary endpoint was the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering from preoperative values. Surgical success was defined as an IOP-lowering from preoperative values ≥ 20% and an IOP absolute value between 6 and 13 mm Hg, without (Complete-success) or with (Qualified-success) antiglaucoma medications.

RESULTS

A total of 158 eyes (34 (21.5%) eyes XEN-solo and 124 (78.5%) XEN + Phaco) were included. The median follow-up time was 28.5 months. In the overall study population, the mean preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 19.4 ± 6.5 mm Hg to 12.4 ± 5.0 mm Hg. The mean preoperative (95% confidence interval) IOP was significantly lowered from 21.3 (19.3-23.2) mm Hg and 18.8 (17.7-20.0) mm Hg to 12.0 (10.4-13.6) mm Hg and 12.5 (11.6-13.5) mm Hg in the XEN-Solo and XEN + Phaco groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 each, respectively). The mean number of ocular-hypotensive medications was significantly reduced in the overall study sample (from 3.4 ± 0.9 to 0.9 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001), XEN-Solo (from 3.5 ± 1.1 to 0.6 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001, and XEN + Phaco (from 3.4 ± 1.1 to 0.9 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001) groups. Eighty-four (53.2%) eyes were categorized as success, with 49 (58.3%) classified as complete success. Eighty-one (51.3%) eyes underwent needling and 15 (9.5%) eyes required an additional surgical procedure. One (0.6%) eye had endophthalmitis.

CONCLUSION

XEN implant, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification significantly lowered IOP and reduced the need of ocular-hypotensive medication, while maintaining a good safety profile.

Comparison between MIGS with trabeculectomy in the management of open-angle glaucoma with cataract: A systematic review

Age is an important risk factor for both glaucoma and cataract. As global life expectancy continues to rise, the prevalence of concomitant open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and cataracts is increasing. Currently, there is a lack of definitive consensus on the optimal management approach for such individuals. Conventionally, trabeculectomy (Trab) in combination with phacoemulsification is the preferred method. Recent developments in microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), which offer similar results with fewer complications, provide a new possible approach to this condition. This study aimed to assess the current knowledge of combination surgery in patients with cataract and OAG to provide a comprehensive understanding and help its implementation in clinical settings. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in May 2021 on five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Proquest, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library). The results were filtered for English and human studies but not publication year. All studies published up to May 2021 were reviewed. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and PEDro scale were used to screen studies for risk of bias where appropriate. Four studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were subsequently added in this review. Study designs consisted of one RCT and three descriptive studies. Appropriate assessment tools were used; these studies demonstrated moderate to good quality. Postoperative mean IOP, IOP reduction, and qualified success rates were comparable in the Phaco-MIGS (Phaco-endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP), Phaco-ab interno trabeculectomy (AIT)) and Phaco-Trab group. Severe complication was reported only in the latter. Phaco-MIGS (in particular, trabectome) shows excellent promise as an option for individuals with OAG and concomitant cataract; further research through RCT is required to validate these findings.

Combined versus standalone XEN45 Gel Stent implantation in either phakic or pseudophakic patients: a case-matched study

PURPOSE

To determine differing outcomes among either phakic or pseudophakic patients who received standalone XEN45 Gel Stent (Allergan, an AbbVie Company, CA, USA) implantation and patients who underwent combined surgery with phacoemulsification.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study involved 180 eyes of 180 participants who underwent XEN45 Gel Stent implantation, of which 60 eyes received combined surgery with phacoemulsification (combined group). Standalone stent implantation was performed on 60 phakic (phakic group) and on 60 pseudophakic eyes (pseudophakic group). The groups were matched in a ratio of 1:1:1 based on multiple criteria. Successful surgery was defined by three scores: IOP at the longest follow-up of < 21 mmHg (Score A) or < 18 mmHg (Score B) and an IOP reduction > 20% or IOP ≤ 15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥ 40% (Score C). In all scores, one open conjunctival revision was allowed, and additional repeat surgery was considered a failure.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up time interval of 20.6 ± 12.6 months, there was a mean IOP-reduction by 37% among the entire cohort. Comparative analysis between the three groups did not show significant differences regarding postoperative IOP, postoperative medication score, side effects, revision rate, repeat surgery rate or success rate. A dysfunctional stent was detected in eight eyes (4%) during open conjunctival revision in 76 eyes.

CONCLUSION

The clinical endpoints investigated did not differ significantly among either phakic or pseudophakic patients who received standalone stent implantation and patients who underwent combined surgery. However mean latency between primary stent implantation and first revision surgery after combined surgery was markedly shorter.

Effectiveness and safety of XEN63 in patients with primary-open-angle glaucoma

This paper evaluates the effectiveness and safety of XEN63 stent, either standalone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Eighty eyes from 80 patients with medically uncontrolled POAG were assigned to undergo XEN63 implant. The primary outcome was the surgical success, defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering from preoperative values ≥ 20% and an IOP absolute value between 6 and 18 mmHg, with or without antiglaucoma medications. Forty-three (53.7%) eyes underwent XEN63-standalone and 37(46.2%) eyes a XEN63 + Phacoemulsification procedure. Success rate was 68.8% (55/80) eyes in the overall study sample, 69.8% (30/43) eyes in the XEN63-standalone group; and 67.6% (25/37) eyes in the XEN63 + Phaco group (p = 0.6133). Preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 22.1 ± 4.9 mmHg and 19.8 ± 3.7 mmHg to 14.7 ± 5.3 mmHg and 13.8 ± 3.4 mmHg in the XEN63-standalone and XEN63 + Phaco groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 each, respectively); without significant differences between them at any of the time-points measured. Preoperative number of ocular-hypotensive drugs was significantly reduced from 2.3 ± 0.8 to 0.3 ± 0.7 drugs, from 2.5 ± 0.7 to 0.3 ± 0.7 drugs; and from 2.0 ± 0.8 to 0.3 ± 0.7 drugs, in the overall, XEN63-standalone, and XEN63 + Phaco groups, respectively. Regarding safety, 3(42.5%) eyes had transient hypotony at some point during the study, although only in one (1.2%) eye was clinically significant. Four (5.0%) eyes underwent a needling, 4 (5.0%) eyes underwent surgical-bleb-revision, 1 (1.2%) eye required a device replacement and 1 (1.2%) eye a device removal due to maculopathy. XEN63, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, significantly lowered IOP and reduced the number of ocular hypotensive medications. The rate of ocular hypotony was relatively high, although it was clinically relevant only in one eye.

Effectiveness and Safety of Xen Gel Stent in Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Although topical medical therapy and selective-laser-trabeculoplasty represent the treatments of choice to reduce intraocular pressure, many patients do not achieve adequate glaucoma control; therefore, they require further options and eventually surgery. Trabeculectomy is still considered the gold standard, but the surgical management of glaucoma has undergone continuous advances in recent years, XEN-gel-stent has been introduced as a safer and less traumatic means of lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). This study aimed to review the effectiveness and safety of clinical data on XEN-stent in OAG patients with a Synthesis-Without-Meta-analysis (SWiM) methodology. A total of 339 studies were identified following a literature search adhering to PRISMA guidelines and, after evaluation, 96 studies are discussed. XEN63 and XEN45 device data were collected both short and long term. In addition, this document has evaluated different aspects related to the XEN implant, including: its role compared to trabeculectomy; the impact of mitomycin-C dose on clinical outcomes; postoperative management of the device; and the identification of potential factors that might predict its clinical outcomes. Finally, current challenges and future perspectives of XEN stent, such as its use in fragile or high myopia patients, were discussed.

Gel Stent Versus Trabeculectomy: The Randomized, Multicenter, Gold-Standard Pathway Study (GPS) of Effectiveness and Safety at 12 Months

PURPOSE

To compare effectiveness and safety of the gel stent to trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority study.

METHODS

Patients with OAG and intraocular pressure (IOP) 15 to 44 mm Hg on topical IOP-lowering medication were randomized 2:1 to gel stent implantation or trabeculectomy. Primary end point (surgical success): percentage of patients at month 12 achieving ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline without medication increase, clinical hypotony, vision loss to counting fingers, or secondary surgical intervention (SSI) in a noninferiority test with 24% margins. Secondary end points (month 12) included mean IOP and medication count, postoperative intervention rate, visual recovery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety end points included adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

At month 12, the gel stent was statistically noninferior to trabeculectomy (between-treatment difference [Δ], -6.1%; 95% CI, -22.9%, 10.8%); 62.1% and 68.2% achieved the primary end point, respectively (P=.487); mean IOP and medication count reductions from baseline were significant (P<.001); and the IOP change-related Δ (2.8 mm Hg) favored trabeculectomy (P=.024). The gel stent resulted in fewer eyes requiring in-office postoperative interventions (P=.024 after excluding laser suture lysis), faster visual recovery (P≤.048), and greater 6-month improvements in visual function problems (ie, PROs; P≤.022). The most common AEs were reduced visual acuity at any time (gel stent, 38.9%; trabeculectomy, 54.5%) and hypotony (IOP <6 mm Hg at any time) (gel stent, 23.2%; trabeculectomy, 50.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

At month 12, the gel stent was statistically noninferior to trabeculectomy, per the percentage of patients achieving ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline without medication increase, clinical hypotony, vision loss to counting fingers, or SSI. Trabeculectomy achieved a statistically lower mean IOP, numerically lower failure rate, and numerically lower need for supplemental medications. The gel stent resulted in fewer postoperative interventions, better visual recovery, and fewer AEs.

Long-Term Effectiveness of XEN 45 Gel-Stent in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of XEN45, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients in clinical practice.

Methods

Retrospective and single-center study conducted on OAG patients who underwent XEN45 implant, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery. We compared the clinical outcomes of the eyes of thosewho underwent XEN-solo versus those who underwent XEN+Phacoemulsification. The primary endpoint was the mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to the last follow-up visit.

Results

A total of 154 eyes, 37 (24.0%) eyes that underwent XEN-solo and 117 (76.0%) eyes that underwent XEN+Phacoemulsification, were included. The mean preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 19.1±5.0 mmHg to 14.9±3.8 mmHg at month-36, p<0.0001. Preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 21.2±6.2 mmHg and 18.4±4.3 mmHg to 14.3±4.0 mm Hg and 15.2±3.7 mmHg at month-36 in the XEN-solo and XEN+Phacoemulsification groups, p<0.0004 and p=0.0009; with no significant differences between them. In the overall study population, the mean number of antiglaucoma medications was significantly reduced from 2.1±0.8 to 0.2±0.6, p<0.0001. There were no significant differences in the proportion of eyes with a final IOP ≤14 mmHg and ≤16 mmHg between XEN-solo and XEN+Phaco groups (p=0.8406 and 0.04970, respectively). Thirty-six (23.4%) eyes required a needling procedure.

Conclusion

XEN implant significantly lowered IOP and reduced the need of ocular hypotensive medication, while maintaining a good safety profile. Beyond week-1, there were no significant differences in IOP lowering between XEN-solo and XEN+Phacoemulsification groups.

Two-year Outcomes of XEN Implantation with Minimal Bleb Needling

Aim

Our study aims to report the 2 years outcomes of the XEN implant in a single unit, single surgeon setting with minimal bleb needling.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent implantation with a XEN device between May 2016 and December 2017. This included patients who underwent both combined phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation alongside XEN implantation and those who underwent XEN implantation alone. Data gathered included basic demographic data, best-corrected visual acuity (LogMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP) in mm Hg, mean deviation from their visual field test, and the number of IOP-lowering medications they were on. This information was recorded for their preoperative visit, and then at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome assessed was a complete success when the patient was without glaucoma medications and had an IOP of 18 mm Hg or less, but more importantly, this also had to equate to a 20% reduction in IOP compared to baseline. Qualified success was defined as the same change in IOP but with medications. Surgical failure is defined as those who required additional glaucoma surgery or those who did not obtain an IOP of 18 mm Hg alongside a 20% reduction in IOP compared to baseline.

Results

At 24 months follow-up 82.5% of patients were surgical successes. Complete surgical success was achieved in 27% of patients. Qualified surgical success was achieved in 55.6% of patients. Subgroup analysis of those undergoing XEN implantation on its own and those combined with phacoemulsification + IOL were similar. The rate of bleb needling was low at 4.5%. Complication rates were acceptable at 9.5%.

Conclusion

It is possible to get good IOP control with minimal postoperative bleb needling in patients who have undergone XEN implantation. Similar success rates are found in those undergoing combined procedures.

Clinical Significance

Bleb needling carries its own risks. Minimizing the number of bleb needling allows procedures to be reserved at a later date. Furthermore, our study shows that success rates are not affected by doing a combined procedure with phacoemulsification.

How to cite this article

Ali ZC, Moshin N, Hakim MT, et al. Two-year Outcomes of XEN Implantation with Minimal Bleb Needling. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(2):79-83.

The efficacy of XEN gel stent implantation in glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Xen is a device for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, and is used to treat POAG, pseudoexfoliative or pigmentary glaucoma, as well as refractory glaucoma. The efficacy of XEN in treating glaucoma remains to be confirmed and clarified. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and associated complication of XEN implantations.

Methods

We conducted a literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang and SinoMed databases to identify studies, published before May 15, 2021, which evaluated XEN in glaucoma, and parameters for measurements included intra-ocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications (NOAM), and bleb needling rate. We compared the measurements of XEN-only procedure between phaco-XEN and trabeculectomy, and we also did sub-analysis based on time points, glaucoma types, ethnics, etc. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias were conducted for evaluating bias.This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA 2020) reporting guideline.

Results

We identified 78 eligible studies, analysis revealed obvious IOP reduction after XEN stent implantation (SMD: 1.69, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.86, p value < 0.001) and NOAM reduction (SMD: 2.11, 95% CI 1.84 to 2.38, p value < 0.001). Sub-analysis showed no significant difference with respect to time points, ethnicities, and economic status. No significant difference was found between XEN treatment effect on POAG and PEXG eyes and between pseudo-phakic and phakic eyes. Also no significant difference was found between XEN and phaco-XEN surgery in terms of IOP after surgery (SMD: -0.01, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.08, p value 0.894). However, NOAM (after publication bias correction) and bleb needling rate (RR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.06to 1.99, p value 0.019) were lower in phaco-XEN group compared to XEN only group. Compared to trabeculectomy, XEN implantation had similar after-surgery IOP, however bleb needling rate (RR: 2.42, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.43, p value 0.004) was higher.

Conclusion

Our results confirmed that XEN is effective in lowering both IOP and NOAM till 48 months after surgery. It is noteworthy that XEN implantation leads to higher needling rate, compared to phaco-XEN or trabeculectomy. Further research, studying complications of XEN on non-European ethnicities, especially on Asian, are in urgent need before XEN is widely applied.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02502-y.

Compatibility and Durability of the Gel Stent Material

INTRODUCTION

The XEN Gel Stent (AbbVie Pharmaceuticals) is a device made from Gelatin; a well-known material in the medical field that is firm enough to hold its shape and soft enough to conform to tissues and reduce the risk of erosion. The Gel Stent creates a permanent outflow connection between the anterior chamber and subconjunctival space.

AREAS COVERED

Validation testing done on the Gel Stent to evaluate biocompatibility and durability of the material as well as real-world experience are included and discussed in this paper.

EXPERT OPINION

Correlating the results of the preclinical testing, study outcomes available in the published literature, and the surgeons' experiences, the device and materials have shown to have an acceptable biocompatibility and durability profile, with a stable, nondegradable, and permanent implant.

Clinical outcomes of combined Preserflo Microshunt implantation and cataract surgery in open-angle glaucoma patients

To assess the effectiveness and safety of the Preserflo Microshunt (PMS) implantation combined with cataract surgery in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients. Retrospective, open-label study conducted on insufficiently controlled OAG patients, who underwent a PMS implant procedure with mitomycin-C 0.2%, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, and were followed for at least 12 months. Success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 18 mmHg and a reduction of at least 20% without (complete) or with (qualified) hypotensive medication. Fifty-eight eyes were included in the study, 35 eyes underwent PMS alone and 23 underwent PMS + Phaco. In the overall study sample, mean IOP was significantly lowered from 21.5 ± 3.3 mmHg at baseline to 14.6 ± 3.5 mmHg at month 12 (p < 0.0001). The IOP was significantly reduced in both groups; p < 0.0001 each, respectively. Ocular hypotensive medication was significantly reduced (p < 0.0001) in both groups. No significant differences were observed in IOP lowering or medication reduction between groups. At month 12, 62.1% eyes were considered as complete success and 82.8% eyes as qualified success. The most common adverse events were device close-to-endothelium, conjunctival fibrosis, and wound leakage. PMS, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, may be considered as a valuable option for treating OAG patients.