Long-Term Effectiveness of XEN 45 Gel-Stent in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of XEN45, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients in clinical practice.

Methods

Retrospective and single-center study conducted on OAG patients who underwent XEN45 implant, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery. We compared the clinical outcomes of the eyes of thosewho underwent XEN-solo versus those who underwent XEN+Phacoemulsification. The primary endpoint was the mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to the last follow-up visit.

Results

A total of 154 eyes, 37 (24.0%) eyes that underwent XEN-solo and 117 (76.0%) eyes that underwent XEN+Phacoemulsification, were included. The mean preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 19.1±5.0 mmHg to 14.9±3.8 mmHg at month-36, p<0.0001. Preoperative IOP was significantly lowered from 21.2±6.2 mmHg and 18.4±4.3 mmHg to 14.3±4.0 mm Hg and 15.2±3.7 mmHg at month-36 in the XEN-solo and XEN+Phacoemulsification groups, p<0.0004 and p=0.0009; with no significant differences between them. In the overall study population, the mean number of antiglaucoma medications was significantly reduced from 2.1±0.8 to 0.2±0.6, p<0.0001. There were no significant differences in the proportion of eyes with a final IOP ≤14 mmHg and ≤16 mmHg between XEN-solo and XEN+Phaco groups (p=0.8406 and 0.04970, respectively). Thirty-six (23.4%) eyes required a needling procedure.

Conclusion

XEN implant significantly lowered IOP and reduced the need of ocular hypotensive medication, while maintaining a good safety profile. Beyond week-1, there were no significant differences in IOP lowering between XEN-solo and XEN+Phacoemulsification groups.

Does mitomycin-C concentration have any influence on XEN45 gel stent outcomes in a real-world setting?

BACKGROUND

To compare the effectiveness and safety of XEN45 implanted with mitomycin-C (MMC) 0.01% versus (vs) XEN45 implanted with MMC 0.02%.

METHODS

Retrospective and single-center study conducted on consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who underwent XEN45-implant, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery. The primary end-point was the mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (63 eyes) were included. Thirty-seven (58.7%) eyes underwent surgery with MMC 0.01% and 26 (41.3%) ones with MMC 0.02%. In the overall study sample, the mean (standard error) IOP was significantly lowered from 17.6 (0.7) mm Hg at baseline to 12.6 (0.3) mm Hg at month 12. The IOP was significantly lowered from 17.3 (15.4 to 19.2) mm Hg and 17.9 (16.1 to 17.8) mm Hg at baseline to 12.3 (11.3 to 13.3) mm Hg and 13.1 (12.3 to 13.9) mm Hg at month 12 in the MMC 0.01% and MMC 0.02% groups, respectively; p < 0.0001 each. The mean number of ocular-hypotensive medications significantly decreased from 2.1 (1.9 to 2.3) at baseline to 0.2 (0.04 to 0.3) at month 12, p < 0.0001, with no significant differences between MMC 0.01% and MMC 0.02% groups, p = 0.5181. At month 12, 50 (80.6%) eyes had functioning blebs. Regarding safety, 18 (28.6%) eyes have experience adverse events.

CONCLUSION

XEN45, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, showed a good effectiveness and safety profile. MMC dose had no influence on the IOP lowering, which may support the use of the lowest dose.

Standalone XEN45 Gel Stent implantation versus combined XEN45-phacoemulsification in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The XEN45 Gel Stent is currently the only FDA-approved sub-conjunctival minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedure. It has been used worldwide either as a standalone implantation procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification surgery. Concomitant phacoemulsification is understood to influence outcomes of traditional subconjunctival filtering surgery. However, the comparative efficacy between standalone XEN45 Gel Sent implantation ("Standalone XEN45") and combined XEN-phacoemulsification surgery ("XEN45-Phaco") remains unclear. This study aims to appraise current literature to compare the efficacy of Standalone XEN45 and XEN45-Phaco in open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL databases was performed with the terms "Xen surgery" followed by selective vetting. Pilot, cohort, observational studies and randomised controlled trials that included at least 10 patients undergoing either Standalone XEN45 or XEN45-Phaco surgeries for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma were deemed eligible for inclusion after independent assessment by 2 authors. The search workflow was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data was pooled using random-effects model. A meta-analysis of continuous outcome and proportions was performed using the meta routine in R v3.2.1.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included. There was a statistically significant difference in IOP reduction favouring Standalone XEN45 at post-operative day 1, week 1, months 1, 3 and 6. There was a statistically significant difference in decrease in IOP-lowering medications favouring Standalone XEN45 at post-operative week 1 and month 1.

CONCLUSION

Standalone XEN45 has superior IOP-lowering outcomes compared to XEN45-Phaco in the early post-operative period, up to 6 months after surgery.

Efficacy of the XEN-Implant in Glaucoma and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Background: To assess the efficacy of XEN-implant surgery in patients with glaucoma, and to perform a meta-analysis of previously published results and compare these to our data. Methods: Prospective case-control study, in which all eyes that underwent XEN-implant surgery were included from 2015 onwards. Sub-analyses were performed for eyes that underwent XEN-implant as standalone procedure and as cataract-combined procedure. To compare our results, a systematic review was performed using the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane database. Meta-analyses were performed by combining data (intraocular pressure (IOP), IOP-lowering medication, and complications) from the retrieved studies. Results: A total of 221 eyes underwent XEN-implant surgery (124 standalone and 97 cataract-combined). The mean ± standard deviation IOP declined from 18.8 ± 6.5 to 13.5 ± 4.3 mmHg at the last follow-up (p < 0.001; 28.9%). Postoperative, no significant differences in IOP or IOP-lowering medication were found between patients with and without combined procedure. Secondary surgeries were performed in 20.8% of eyes, most of them (63.0%) within six months. A meta-analysis of 19 studies retrieved from the systematic review showed a two-years postoperative pooled mean (weighted mean difference) of 14.5 (7.3) mmHg and 1.0 (1.6) for IOP and IOP-lowering medications, respectively (compared to 13.5 (5.3) mmHg and 3.2 (2.4) in the current study). Conclusion: XEN-implant surgery was effective and safe in lowering IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications. There were no differences between standalone and combined procedures.