Controlling nutritional status score as a prognostic marker to predict overall survival in resected biliary tract cancers

Body composition change indices combined with Prognostic Nutritional Index predicts the clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in conjunction with body composition change indices, namely subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI), with regard to clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective investigation encompassed patients with comprehensive clinical and pathological data, inclusive of portal phase enhanced CT images. Continuous variables underwent analysis utilizing the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test, while categorical variables were assessed employing the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher test. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the Log-rank test. Independent prognostic indicators were determined through Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram predicting survival probability for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was constructed.

RESULTS

Within the PNI-SFA groups, patients in Group 1 exhibited inferior PFS and OS compared to the other two groups. Similarly, among the PNI-SMI groups, Group 1 patients demonstrated poorer PFS and OS. PNI-SMI and Eosi were identified as independent prognostic factors through Cox regression analysis. Furthermore, positive associations with patient prognosis were observed for BMI, SAF, SMI, and PNI.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive consideration of PNI-SFA and PNI-SMI proved to be a superior prognostic predictor for GC patients undergoing ICI treatment.

A Novel Bifidobacterium/Klebsiella Ratio in Characterization Analysis of the Gut and Bile Microbiota of CCA Patients

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a serious health problem worldwide. The gut and bile microbiota have not been clearly characterized in patients with CCA, and better noninvasive diagnostic approaches for CCA need to be established. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the gut and bile microbiota in CCA patients. Forty-two CCA patients and 16 healthy normal controls (HNCs) were enrolled. DNA was extracted from fecal and bile samples and subjected to 16S rRNA gene analysis. We found that there were significant differences in the species diversity, structure, and composition of the microbial communities between the CCA group and the HNC grouAt the phylum level, compared with that in the HNC group, the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteriota was significantly decreased in the CCA group, whereas Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were significantly enriched. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio significantly decreased in the CCA group compared to the HNC grouThe relative abundance of Klebsiella in the CCA group was significantly higher than that in the HNC group, while the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium was significantly decreased. The Bifidobacterium/Klebsiella (B/K) ratio was established as a novel biomarker and was found to be significantly decreased in the CCA group compared with the HNC grouOur findings provide evidence supporting the use of Klebsiella and Bifidobacterium as noninvasive intestinal microbiomarkers for improving the diagnosis of CCA.

Comparison of the effectiveness of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone in advanced biliary tract cancer and construction of the nomogram for survival prediction based on the inflammatory index and controlling nutritional status score

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) and explore the biomarkers affecting the prognosis of immunotherapy, to construct a nomogram for the prediction of survival.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to include a total of 209 patients with advanced BTC treated in the first line from 2018 to 2022, divided into a combination therapy group (n = 129) and a chemotherapy-only group (n = 80) according to whether ICIs were applied in combination. Univariate and multifactorial COX regression analyses were performed on variables that may affect prognosis to identify independent influences on patient prognosis, and this was used to create nomograms, which were then prospectively validated and calibrated.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) of patients in the combination therapy group were higher than those in the chemotherapy alone group [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.152, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7848-1.692, p = 0.0004, and HR = 1.067, 95% CI: 0.7474-1.524, p = 0.0016]. The objective response rate (ORR) of patients in the combination therapy and chemotherapy alone groups was 39.5% (51/129) vs. 27.5% (22/80), and the disease control rate (DCR) between the two groups was 89.9% (116/129) vs. 83.8% (67/80). Univariate analysis revealed the gender, presence of long-term tobacco and alcohol, degree of histological differentiation, serum albumin level, presence of liver metastases, presence of multi-visceral metastases, response, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), glycoprotein antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), systemic inflammatory index (SII), and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores were statistically significant with patient prognosis (all P values < 0.05). Multi-factor COX regression analysis was continued for the above variables, and the results showed that NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and CONUT scores were independent influences on patients' OS (all p values < 0.05). A nomogram (C-index 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84) was created based on these independent influences and later validated using a validation cohort (C-index 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68-0.81). The time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) showed that the area under curve (AUC) of the training cohort patients at 12, 18, and 24 months was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.81), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.85), and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.87) and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.58-0.79), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65-0.87), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), respectively. Finally, calibration was performed using calibration curves, and the results showed that nomograms based on inflammatory metrics and CONUT scores could be used to assess survival (12, 18, and 24 months) in patients with advanced BTC treated with ICIs in the first line.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced BTC benefit more from first-line treatment with standard chemotherapy in combination with ICIs than with chemotherapy alone. In addition, nomograms based on inflammatory metrics and CONUT scores can be used to predict survival at 12, 18, and 24 months in patients with advanced BTC treated with ICIs.

Prognostic role of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients with biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have not reached consistent results regarding the prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in biliary tract cancer (BTC). Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the precise role of the CONUT score in predicting the prognosis of BTC.

METHODS

Electronic platforms including Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were comprehensively searched up to May 2, 2023. We also determined combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the role of the CONUT score in predicting the prognosis of patients with BTC.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1,441 patients were included in the present study. Nine studies treated patients with surgical resection, and one study used percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) plus 125I seed intracavitary irradiation. Based on the combined data, a higher CONUT score significantly predicted dismal overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.94, 95%CI = 1.41-2.66, p < 0.001), inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.48-2.17, p < 0.001) in BTC, and low differentiation (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.15-2.14, p = 0.004). Nonetheless, the CONUT score was not related to sex, lymph node metastasis, microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, distant metastasis, TNM stage, or tumor number in patients with BTC.

CONCLUSION

Higher CONUT scores significantly predicted worse OS and RFS in patients with BTC. Moreover, BTC patients with high CONUT scores tended to have poor tumor differentiation. The CONUT score could help clinicians stratify high-risk patients with BTC and devise individualized treatment plans.

Prognostic impact of the Controlling Nutritional Status Score in patients with biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a malignancy associated with unfavorable outcomes. Advanced BTC patients have a propensity to experience compromised immune and nutritional status as a result of obstructive jaundice and biliary inflammation. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the impact of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in the context of BTC prognosis. The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis on the association between CONUT and the prognosis of patients suffering from BTC.

Methods

A defined search strategy was implemented to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies published until March 2023, with a focus on overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival/recurrence-free survival(RFS), and relevant clinical characteristics. The prognostic potential of the CONUT score was evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

In this meta-analysis, a total of 1409 patients from China and Japan were involved in 9 studies. The results indicated that the CONUT score was significantly correlated with worse OS (HR=2.13, 95% CI 1.61-2.82, P<0.0001) and RFS (HR=1.83, 95% CI 1.44-2.31, P<0.0001) in patients with BTC. And, the analysis showed that a high CONUT score was significantly associated with clinical characteristics such as jaundice (OR=1.60, 95% CI=1.14-2.25, P=0.006), poorly differentiated tumor (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.03-1.99, P=0.03), pT3 and 4 stage of the tumor (OR=1.87, 95% CI=1.30-2.68, P=0.0007), and complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade IIIa or higher (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.03-3.12, P=0.04).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that a high CONUT score can serve as a significant prognostic indicator for survival outcomes among patients diagnosed with BTC.

Development and validation of a new prognostic immune–inflammatory–nutritional score for predicting outcomes after curative resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study

Background

Immune function, nutrition status, and inflammation influence tumor initiation and progression. This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study that investigated the prognostic value and clinical relevance of immune-, inflammatory-, and nutritional-related biomarkers to develop a novel prognostic immune–inflammatory–nutritional score (PIIN score) for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

The clinical data of 571 patients (406 in the training set and 165 in the validation set) were collected from four large hepato-pancreatico-biliary centers of patients with ICC who underwent surgical resection between January 2011 and September 2017. Twelve blood biomarkers were collected to develop the PIIN score using the LASSO Cox regression model. The predictive value was further assessed using validation datasets. Afterward, nomograms combining the PIIN score and other clinicopathological parameters were developed and validated based on the calibration curve, time-dependent AUC curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the day of primary resection of ICC.

Results

Based on the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grade, neutrophil- to- lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and systemic immune- inflammation index (SII) biomarkers, the PIIN score that classified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups could be calculated. Patients with high-risk scores had shorter OS (training set, p &lt; 0.001; validation set, p = 0.003) and RFS (training set, p &lt; 0.001; validation set, p = 0.002) than patients with low-risk scores. The high PIIN score was also associated with larger tumors (≥5 cm), lymph node metastasis (N1 stage), multiple tumors, and high tumor grade or TNM (tumor (T), nodes (N), and metastases (M)) stage. Furthermore, the high PIIN score was a significant independent prognostic factor of OS and RFS in both the training (p &lt; 0.001) and validation (p = 0.003) cohorts, respectively. A PIIN-nomogram for individualized prognostic prediction was constructed by integrating the PIIN score with the clinicopathological variables that yielded better predictive performance than the TNM stage.

Conclusion

The PIIN score, a novel immune–inflammatory–nutritional-related prognostic biomarker, predicts the prognosis in patients with resected ICC and can be a reliable tool for ICC prognosis prediction after surgery. Our study findings provide novel insights into the role of cancer-related immune disorders, inflammation, and malnutrition.

Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Nutritional risk index (NRI) is an index based on ideal body weight that aims to present body weight and serum albumin levels. It has been utilized to discriminate patients at risk of postoperative complications and predict the postoperative outcome of major surgeries. However, this index remains limited for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The research explores the clinical and prognostic significance of NRI in breast cancer patients. This study included 785 breast cancer patients (477 cases received NACT and 308 cases did not) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal NRI cutoff value was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, then reclassified as low NRI group (<112) and high NRI group (≥112). The results demonstrated that NRI independently predicted survival on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses [P = 0.019, hazard ratio (HR): 1.521, 95% CI: 1.071–2.161 and P = 0.004, HR: 1.415, 95% CI: 1.119–1.789; and P = 0.026, HR:1.500, 95% CI: 1.051–2.143 and P < 0.001, HR: 1.547, 95% CI: 1.221–1.959]. According to the optimal cutoff value of NRI, the high NRI value patients had longer mean DFS and OS time in contrast to those with low NRI value patients (63.47 vs. 40.50 months; 71.50 vs. 56.39 months). Furthermore, the results demonstrated that the high NRI score patients had significantly longer mean DFS and OS time than those with low NRI score patients in early-stage breast cancer (χ² = 9.0510, P = 0.0026 and χ² = 9.2140, P = 0.0024) and advanced breast cancer (χ² = 6.2500, P = 0.0124 and χ² = 5.8880, P = 0.0152). The mean DFS and OS values in patients with high NRI scores were significantly longer in contrast to those with low NRI scores in different molecular subtypes. The common toxicities after NACT were hematologic and gastrointestinal reactions, and the NRI had no statistically significant effects on toxicities, except in nausea (χ² = 9.2413, P = 0.0024), mouth ulcers (χ² = 4.8133, P = 0.0282), anemia (χ² = 8.5441, P = 0.0140), and leukopenia (χ² = 11.0951, P = 0.0039). NRI serves as a minimally invasive, easily accessible and convenient prognostic tool for evaluating breast cancer prognoses and treatment efficacy, and may help doctors in terms of selecting measures of greater efficiency or appropriateness to better treat breast cancer.