Clinical outcomes of ceftazidime-avibactam in lung transplant recipients with infections caused by extensively drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli

The changing landscape of infections in the lung transplant recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections in lung transplant recipients remain a major challenge and can affect lung allograft function and cause significant morbidity and mortality. New strategies for the prevention and treatment of infection in lung transplantation have emerged and are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

For important vaccine preventable infections (VPIs), guidance has been updated for at risk solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, data on the efficacy of newer vaccines in lung transplant, including the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, are limited. Studies demonstrate improved vaccination rate with Infectious Diseases consultation during pretransplant evaluation. Two new antiviral agents for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in SOT, letermovir and maribavir, are being incorporated into clinical care. CMV-specific cell-mediated immune function assays are more widely available. Antibiotics for the management of multidrug resistant pathogens and Burkholderia cepacia complex have been described in case series and case reports in lung transplant.

SUMMARY

Although new vaccines and novel therapies for preventing and treating infections are available, larger studies evaluating efficacy in lung transplant recipients are needed.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia or Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam that is approved for the treatment of pediatric (≥ 3 months) and adult patients with complicated infections including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), and bacteremia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362856) aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative synthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of CAZ-AVI in treating adult patients with bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

The databases included in the search, until November 7, 2022, were Embase and PubMed. A total of 24 studies (retrospective: 22, prospective: 2) with separate outcomes for patients with bacteremia or pneumonia were included.

RESULTS

The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Qualitative (24 studies) and quantitative (8/24 studies) syntheses were performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS checklist and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

In studies included in the meta-analysis, lower all-cause mortality for patients with bacteremia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46) and improved rates of clinical cure for patients with bacteremia (OR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.60-9.23) and nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.55-6.60) was observed in the CAZ-AVI group compared with the comparator group. Data provided here may be considered while using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat infections.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022362856.

Efficacy and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections: A retrospective multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVES

Limited data on clinical and microbiological efficacy, patient mortality, and other associated factors are available for ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI)-based regimens for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). This study aimed to assess these issues retrospectively using multicenter data.

METHODS

This multicenter study included CR-GNB infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based regimens for more than three days. Patient characteristics, bacterial culture reports, drug-sensitivity test results, and antibiotic use, including CAZ/AVI use, were extracted from the patient's clinical records. The clinical and microbiological efficacy of the combined drug regimen and patient mortality were evaluated according to corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the efficacy and mortality-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with CR-GNB infection were considered for the analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the treatment of CAZ/AVI-based regimens, the clinical efficacy was 75.4 %. The 7-day microbial efficacy and clearance rate after treatment were 43.7 % and 66.0 %, respectively. Moreover, 30-day all-cause and in-hospital mortality were 11.5 % and 14.2 %, respectively. Harboring renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate (CCR) of<20 mL/min), cardiovascular diseases, and digestive system diseases were independent risk factors for poor clinical efficacy of CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Bloodstream infection (BSI), patients with the adjusted doses of CAZ/AVI, and CAZ/AVI co-administration with carbapenem were independently associated factors of bacterial clearance by CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Age, total hospital stays, use of mechanical ventilation, and cumulative CAZ/AVI dose were independent factors associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

CAZ/AVI was an effective drug in treating CR-GNB infection. CAZ/AVI that is mostly excreted by the kidney and is accumulated in renal impairment should be renally adjusted. Renal dysfunction and the adjusted dose of CAZ/AVI were associated with efficacy. Clinicians should individualize CAZ/AVI regimen and dose by the level of renal function to achieve optimal efficacy and survival. The efficacy of CAZ/AVI in the treatment of CR-GNB infection, as well as the implementation of individualized precision drug administration of CAZ/AVI according to patients' different infection sites, renal function, bacterial types, bacterial resistance mechanisms, blood concentration monitoring and other conditions need to be further studied in multicenter.

Epidemiology, drug resistance analysis and mortality risk factor prediction of gram-negative bacteria infections in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective treatment for many malignant and refractory diseases. However, infections, as the most common complication after transplantation, often lead to poor long-term prognosis of patients. In this study, we collected electronic medical records of allo-HSCT recipients with gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections between January 2012 and September 2021, analyzed epidemiological characteristics and antibiotic sensitivity, and determined independent risk factors for carbapenem-resistant GNB (CR-GNB) infections and death by Logistic and Cox regression models. During the 9-year period, 183 of 968 patients developed GNB infections, of which 58 died. The most common pathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae. CR-GNB, especially carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) had a high resistance rate to commonly used clinical antibiotics. Independent risk factors for CR-GNB infections were use of carbapenem antibiotics for >3 days one month before transplantation (OR = 3.244, 95% CI 1.428-7.369, P = 0.005), use of special immunosuppressants after transplantation (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.008-1.452, P = 0.041), and time of hematopoietic reconstruction >20 days (OR = 2.628, 95% CI 1.369-5.043, P = 0.004). Independent risk factors for mortality were interval between diagnosis and transplantation >180 days (HR = 2.039, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.963, P = 0.035), total bilirubin levels during infection >34.2 μmol/L (HR = 3.39, 95% CI 1.583-7.256, P = 0.002) and septic shock (HR = 5.345, 95% CI 2.655-10.761, P = 0.000). In conclusion, GNB has a high incidence and mortality in allo-HSCT recipients. Early transplantation for eligible patients, attention to liver function protection, timely identification and treatment of septic shock can help to improve the prognosis of patients.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Experience of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection in recipients after lung transplantation (LT) is relatively limited.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on lung transplant recipients receiving CAZ/AVI therapy for CRPA infection. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological cure.

Results

Among 183 LT recipients, a total of 15 recipients with CRPA infection who received CAZ/AVI therapy were enrolled in this study. The mean age of recipients was 54 years and 73.3% of recipients were male. The median time from infection onset to initiation of CAZ/AVI treatment was 4 days (IQR, 3-7) and the mean duration of CAZ/AVI therapy was 10 days. CAZ/AVI was mainly administered as monotherapy in LT recipients (80%). Among these eligible recipients, 14-day and 30-day mortality were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 53.3% and 60%, respectively. Three recipients (20%) experienced recurrent infection. In addition, the mean lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay were 24 days and 35 days, respectively, among LT recipients.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI may be an alternative and promising regimen for CRPA eradiation in lung transplant recipients.

Epidemiology, Drug Resistance, and Risk Factors for Mortality Among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients with Hospital-Acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections: A Single-Center Retrospective Study from China

Objective

Infection is the most common complication and cause of death after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Our study aims to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors for death of Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in HSCT recipients, so as to provide evidence for guiding antibiotic use and improving prognosis in the future.

Methods

The epidemiology, clinical manifestations and drug resistance rate with K. pneumoniae infections among HSCT recipients between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression model and Cox regression model were respectively used to determine the risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) acquisition and death.

Results

Fifty-nine HSCT recipients suffered from K. pneumoniae infections, with a mortality rate of 42.4%. The most common site was lung, followed by blood stream. The resistance rate of K. pneumoniae to various clinically common antibiotics was high, especially CRKP, which was only sensitive to amikacin and tigecycline. Independent risk factor for CPKP acquisition was a previous infection within 3 months before transplantation (OR=10.981, 95% CI 1.474–81.809, P=0.019). Independent risk factors for mortality included interval from diagnosis to transplantation > 180 days (HR=3.963, 95% CI 1.25–12.561, P=0.019), engraftment period > 20 days (HR=8.015, 95% CI 2.355–27.279, P=0.001), non-use of anti-CMV immunoglobulin/rituximab after transplantation (HR=10.720, 95% CI 2.390–48.089, P=0.002), and PCT > 5 μg/L (HR=5.906, 95% CI 1.623–21.500, P=0.007).

Conclusion

K. pneumoniae infection has become a serious threat for HSCT recipients, which reminds us to pay enough attention and actively seek new strategies.

Update of clinical application in ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have become a major global public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a newer combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The aim of this review is to describe the recent real-world experience of CAZ-AVI for the infections due to MDR-GNB.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for clinical application in CAZ-AVI for MDR-GNB infections. Reference lists were reviewed and synthesized for narrative review.

RESULTS

MDRGNB infections are associated with higher mortality significantly comparing to drug-susceptible bacterial infections. Fortunately, CAZ-AVI shows significant benefits for infections due to KPC or OXA-48 CRE, comparing to colistin, carbapenem, aminoglycoside and other older agents, even in those with immunocompromised status. The efficacy of CAZ-AVI varies in different infection sites due to CRE, which is lower in pneumonia. Early use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Noteworthy, when adopted as salvage therapy, CAZ-AVI is still superior to other GNB active antibiotics. CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam is recommended as the first line of MBL-CRE infections. However, for infections caused by KPC- and OXA-48-producing isolates, further investigations are needed to demonstrate the benefit of combination therapy. Besides CRE, CAZ-AVI is also active to MDR-PA. However, the development of resistance in CRE and MDR-PA against CAZ-AVI is alarming, and more investigations and studies are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections due to CAZ-AVI-resistant pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI appears to be a valuable therapeutic option in MDR-GNB infections. Using CAZ-AVI appropriately to improve efficacy and decrease the emergence of resistance is important.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection after solid organ transplantation: Recent trends in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches

Background

Infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli (MDR GNB), in particular extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing (ESBL‐E) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a major threat in solid organ transplantation (SOT). Outcome prediction and therapy are challenging due to the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or well‐designed observational studies focused on this population.

Methods

Narrative review with a focus on the contributions provided by the ongoing multinational INCREMENT‐SOT consortium (ClinicalTrials identifier NCT02852902) in the fields of epidemiology and clinical management.

Results

The Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), the Group for Study of Infection in Transplantation of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GESITRA‐SEIMC), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) recently published their recommendations for the management of MDR GNB infections in SOT recipients. We revisit the SET/GESITRA‐SEIMC/REIPI document taking into consideration new evidence that emerged on the molecular epidemiology, prognostic stratification, and treatment of post‐transplant ESBL‐E and CRE infections. Results derived from the INCREMENT‐SOT consortium may support the therapeutic approach to post‐transplant bloodstream infection (BSI). The initiatives devoted to sparing the use of carbapenems in low‐risk ESBL‐E BSI or to repurposing existing non‐β‐lactam antibiotics for CRE in both non‐transplant and transplant patients are reviewed, as well as the eventual positioning in the specific SOT setting of recently approved antibiotics.

Conclusion

Due to the clinical complexity and relative rarity of ESBL‐E and CRE infections in SOT recipients, multinational cooperative efforts such as the INCREMENT‐SOT Project should be encouraged. In addition, RCTs focused on post‐transplant serious infection remain urgently needed.

Multiresistant organisms: bacteria and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections with multiresistant organisms are an emerging problem, cause early mortality post lung transplantation and are sometimes associated with graft dysfunction. Frequently they raise questions about the selection of lung transplant candidates and therapeutic management post lung transplantation. There are no guidelines and management must be individualized. This review summarizes the available therapeutic options in cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms and outcomes after lung transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improvements in diagnosis, new and more effective drugs and the experience gained in the management of these infections in lung transplantation, lead to a more optimistic horizon than that found a decade ago.

SUMMARY

Update on the management of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Mycobacterium abscessus complex, Aspergillus spp., Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora prolificans infections. This review clarifies current posttransplant outcomes and adds a little hope in these scenarios.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

A systematic literature review was undertaken to evaluate real-world use of ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options.

METHODS

Literature searches retrieved peer-reviewed publications and abstracts from major international infectious disease congresses from January 2015 to February 2021. Results were screened using pre-defined criteria to limit the dataset to relevant publications (notable exclusions were paediatric data and outcomes data for bacteria intrinsically resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam). Data for included publications were subjected to qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Seventy-three relevant publications (62 peer-reviewed articles; 10 abstracts) comprising 1926 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (either alone or combined with other antimicrobials) and 1114 comparator/control patients were identified. All patients were hospitalised for serious illness and most had multiple comorbidities. The most common infections were pneumonia, bacteraemia, and skin/soft tissue, urinary tract, or abdominal infections; smaller numbers of patients with meningitis, febrile neutropenia, osteomyelitis, and cystic fibrosis were also included. Carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CRE; n = 1718) and carbapenem-resistant, multidrug-resistant (MDR), and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 150) were the most common pathogens. Most publications reported positive outcomes for ceftazidime-avibactam treatment (clinical success rates ranged from 45 to 100% and reported 30-day mortality from 0 to 63%), which were statistically superior versus comparators in some studies. ceftazidime-avibactam resistance emergence occurred infrequently and mostly in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae strains.

CONCLUSION

This review provides qualitative evidence of successful use of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of hospitalised patients with CRE and MDR P. aeruginosa infections with limited treatment options.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime–avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime–avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime–avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator β-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane–tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime–avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime–avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime–avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Combination Therapy in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: To systematically review and compare the efficacy and posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with Gram-negative pathogens. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases were searched from their inception up to March 31, 2021, to obtain studies on ceftazidime-avibactam therapy versus ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The primary outcome was mortality rate, and the second outcomes were microbiologically negative, clinical success, and the development of resistance after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Results: Seventeen studies representing 1,435 patients (837 received ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and 598 received ceftazidime-avibactam therapy) were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that no statistically significant difference was found on mortality rate (Petos odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.34), microbiologically negative (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.54-1.81), and clinical success (OR =0.95, 95% CI 0.64-1.39) between ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy and ceftazidime-avibactam therapy. Although there was no difference in posttreatment resistance of ceftazidime-avibactam (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.34-1.26) in all included studies, a trend favoring the combination therapy was found (according to the pooled three studies, OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.78). Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy may not have beneficial effects on mortality, microbiologically negative, and clinical success to patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A trend of posttreatment resistance occurred more likely in ceftazidime-avibactam therapy than the combination therapy. Due to the limited number of studies that can be included, additional high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.

Increased gene expression and copy number of mutated blaKPC lead to high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam was reported, and it is important to investigate the mechanisms of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in K. pneumoniae with mutations in bla_KPC.

Results

We report the mutated bla_KPC is not the only mechanism related to CZA resistance, and investigate the role of outer porin defects, efflux pump, and relative gene expression and copy number of bla_KPC and ompk35/36. Four ceftazidime/avibactam-sensitive isolates detected wild type bla_KPC-2, while 4 ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates detected mutated bla_KPC (bla_KPC-51, bla_KPC-52, and bla_KPC-33). Compared with other ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates with the minimal inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam ranging 128–256 mg/L, the relative gene expression and copy number of bla_KPC was increased in the isolate which carried bla_KPC-51 and also showed the highest minimal inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam at 2048 mg/L. The truncated Ompk35 contributes rare to ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in our isolates. No significant difference in minimal inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam was observed after the addition of PABN.

Conclusions

Increased gene expression and copy number of mutated bla_KPC can cause high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance.

Cefiderocol-Based Combination Therapy for "Difficult-to-Treat" Gram-Negative Severe Infections: Real-Life Case Series and Future Perspectives

Cefiderocol is a new cephalosporin displaying against extensively resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria. We report our experience with cefiderocol-based combination therapies as “rescue” treatments in immunocompromised or critically ill patients or in patients with post-surgical infections who had failed previous regimens. A total of 13 patients were treated from 1 September 2020 to 31 March 2021. In total, 5/13 (38%) patients were classified as critically ill, due to severe COVID-19 lung failure; 4/13 (31%) patients had post-surgical infections and 4/13 (31%) had severe infections in immunocompromised subjects due to solid organ transplantation (2/4) or hematological malignancy (2/4). Overall, 10/13 infections were caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, one by KPC-positive ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia and two by Pseudomonas aeruginosa XDR. Based on clinical, microbiological and hematobiochemical evaluation, cefiderocol was associated with different companion drugs, particularly with fosfomycin, high-dose tigecycline and/or colistin. Microbiological eradication was achieved in all cases and the 30-day survival rate was 10/13; two patients died due to SARS-CoV-2 lung failure, whereas one death was attributed to subsequent infections. No recurrent infections within 30 days were reported. Finally, we hereby discuss the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol and the possible place in the therapy of this novel drug.

Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion method for detection of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China

Background

Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved in China in 2019 for treating complicated intra-abdominal infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and infections caused by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which treatment options are limited. However, no currently available commercial systems have been approved for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of ceftazidime-avibactam in China. Here, we evaluated the Etest and disk diffusion method for detecting the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa in China.

Results

In total, 194 Enterobacterales and 77 P. aeruginosa isolates, which were divided into a random selection group (140 Enterobacterales and 46 P. aeruginosa isolates) and stock group (54 Enterobacterales and 31 P. aeruginosa isolates), were assessed by the Etest, disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameters were interpreted according to the CLSI supplement M100 30th edition. For all 271 tested isolates, no very major errors were found by using Etest, whereas the overall major error rate was 2.0% (4/203). The overall categorical agreement rates of Etest for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 99.5% (193/194) and 96.1% (74/77), respectively, and the essential agreement rates were 95.9% (186/194) and 94.8% (73/77), respectively. The disk diffusion method showed that the very major error and major error rates were 1.5% (3/204) and 2.5% (5/203), respectively. Overall categorical agreement rates values of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 98.5% (191/194) and 93.5% (72/77) compared with broth microdilution, respectively.

Conclusions

For Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, both the Etest and disk diffusion method showed acceptable performance as alternatives to the standard broth microdilution method for clinical treatment interpretation. Application of the disk diffusion method in Enterobacterales was slightly better than that in P. aeruginosa.