Opicinumab: is it a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis?

Which experimental factors govern successful animal-to-human translation in multiple sclerosis drug development? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite successes in multiple sclerosis (MS) drug development, the effectiveness of animal studies in predicting successful bench-to-bedside translation is uncertain. Our goal was to identify predictors of successful animal-to-human translation for MS by systematically comparing animal studies of approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with those that failed in clinical trials due to efficacy or safety concerns.

METHODS

Systematic review of animal studies testing MS DMTs, identified from searches in PubMed and EMBASE. A random effect meta-analysis was fitted to the data to compare outcome effect sizes for approved versus failed DMTs. Effect sizes and testing under diverse experimental conditions were assessed as potential predictors for successful translation.

FINDINGS

We included 497 animal studies, covering 15 approved and 11 failed DMTs, tested in approximately 30'000 animals. DMTs were tested in a small repertoire of experimental parameters: about 86% of studies used experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), 80% used mice, and 76% used female animals. There was no association between animal study outcomes or testing DMTs under varied conditions (e.g., different laboratories or models) and successful approval. Surprisingly, 91% of animal studies were published after first-in-MS trial and 91% after official regulatory approval.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings emphasize the complexity in carrying drugs from animals to clinical practice. Specific challenges include limited experimental methods in animal research and a disconnect between preclinical and clinical research. We advocate for efforts to streamline drug development for MS to improve animal research's relevance for patients.

FUNDING

NIH, Swiss National Science Foundation, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare.

Complementary strategies to be used in conjunction with animal models for multiple sclerosis drug discovery: adapting preclinical validation of drug candidates to the need of remyelinating strategies

INTRODUCTION

The quest for novel MS therapies focuses on promoting remyelination and neuroprotection, necessitating innovative drug design paradigms and robust preclinical validation methods to ensure efficient clinical translation. The complexity of new drugs action mechanisms is strengthening the need for solid biological validation attempting to address all possible pitfalls and biases precluding access to efficient and safe drugs.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors describe the different in vitro and in vivo models that should be used to create an integrated approach for preclinical validation of novel drugs, including the evaluation of the action mechanism. This encompasses 2D, 3D in vitro models and animal models presented in such a way to define the appropriate use in a global process of drug screening and hit validation.

EXPERT OPINION

None of the current available tests allow the concomitant evaluation of anti-inflammatory, immune regulators or remyelinating agents with sufficient reliability. Consequently, the collaborative efforts of academia, industry, and regulatory agencies are essential for establishing standardized protocols, validating novel methodologies, and translating preclinical findings into clinically meaningful outcomes.

Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis-A Key to Understanding and Managing Disease Progression

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), the least frequent type of multiple sclerosis (MS), is characterized by a specific course and clinical symptoms, and it is associated with a poor prognosis. It requires extensive differential diagnosis and often a long-term follow-up before its correct recognition. Despite recent progress in research into and treatment for progressive MS, the diagnosis and management of this type of disease still poses a challenge. Considering the modern concept of progression "smoldering" throughout all the stages of disease, a thorough exploration of PPMS may provide a better insight into mechanisms of progression in MS, with potential clinical implications. The goal of this study was to review the current evidence from investigations of PPMS, including its background, clinical characteristics, potential biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities. Processes underlying CNS damage in PPMS are discussed, including chronic immune-mediated inflammation, neurodegeneration, and remyelination failure. A review of potential clinical, biochemical and radiological biomarkers is presented, which is useful in monitoring and predicting the progression of PPMS. Therapeutic options for PPMS are summarized, with approved therapies, ongoing clinical trials and future directions of investigations. The clinical implications of findings from PPMS research would be associated with reliable assessments of disease outcomes, improvements in individualized therapeutic approaches and, hopefully, novel therapeutic targets, relevant for the management of progression.

Analysis of animal-to-human translation shows that only 5% of animal-tested therapeutic interventions obtain regulatory approval for human applications

There is an ongoing debate about the value of animal experiments to inform medical practice, yet there are limited data on how well therapies developed in animal studies translate to humans. We aimed to assess 2 measures of translation across various biomedical fields: (1) The proportion of therapies which transition from animal studies to human application, including involved timeframes; and (2) the consistency between animal and human study results. Thus, we conducted an umbrella review, including English systematic reviews that evaluated the translation of therapies from animals to humans. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception until August 1, 2023. We assessed the proportion of therapeutic interventions advancing to any human study, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and regulatory approval. We meta-analyzed the concordance between animal and human studies. The risk of bias was probed using a 10-item checklist for systematic reviews. We included 122 articles, describing 54 distinct human diseases and 367 therapeutic interventions. Neurological diseases were the focus of 32% of reviews. The overall proportion of therapies progressing from animal studies was 50% to human studies, 40% to RCTs, and 5% to regulatory approval. Notably, our meta-analysis showed an 86% concordance between positive results in animal and clinical studies. The median transition times from animal studies were 5, 7, and 10 years to reach any human study, an RCT, and regulatory approval, respectively. We conclude that, contrary to widespread assertions, the rate of successful animal-to-human translation may be higher than previously reported. Nonetheless, the low rate of final approval indicates potential deficiencies in the design of both animal studies and early clinical trials. To ameliorate the efficacy of translating therapies from bench to bedside, we advocate for enhanced study design robustness and the reinforcement of generalizability.

Nogo-A neutralization in the central nervous system with a blood-brain barrier-penetrating antibody

The poor penetration of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) impedes the development of regenerative therapies for neurological diseases. For example, Nogo-A is a myelin-associated protein highly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) whose inhibitory effects on neuronal plasticity can be neutralized with direct administration of 11C7 mAb in CNS tissues/fluids, but not with peripheral administrations such as intravenous injections. Therefore, in the present study, we engineered a CNS-penetrating antibody against Nogo-A by combining 11C7 mAb and the single-chain variable fragment (scFv) of 8D3, a rat antibody binding transferrin receptor 1 (TfR) and mediating BBB transcytosis (11C7-scFv8D3). The binding of 11C7-scFv8D3 to Nogo-A and to TfR/CD71 was validated by capture ELISA and Biolayer Interferometry. After intravenous injection in mice, capture ELISA measurements revealed fast plasma clearance of 11C7-scFv8D3 concomitantly with brain and spinal cord accumulation at levels up to 19 fold as high as those of original 11C7 mAb. 11C7-scFv8D3 detection in the parenchyma indicated effective blood-to-CNS transfer. A single dose of 11C7-scFv8D3 induced stronger activation of the growth-promoting AkT/mTOR/S6 signaling pathway than 11C7 mAb or control antibody. Taken together, our results show that BBB-crossing 11C7-scFv8D3 engages Nogo-A in the mouse CNS and stimulates neuronal growth mechanisms.

Extracellular-Vesicle-Based Therapeutics in Neuro-Ophthalmic Disorders

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as promising candidates for developing novel therapeutics for a wide range of pathologies, including ocular disorders, due to their ability to deliver a diverse array of bioactive molecules, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, to recipient cells. Recent studies have shown that EVs derived from various cell types, including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), retinal pigment epithelium cells, and endothelial cells, have therapeutic potential in ocular disorders, such as corneal injury and diabetic retinopathy. EVs exert their effects through various mechanisms, including promoting cell survival, reducing inflammation, and inducing tissue regeneration. Furthermore, EVs have shown promise in promoting nerve regeneration in ocular diseases. In particular, EVs derived from MSCs have been demonstrated to promote axonal regeneration and functional recovery in various animal models of optic nerve injury and glaucoma. EVs contain various neurotrophic factors and cytokines that can enhance neuronal survival and regeneration, promote angiogenesis, and modulate inflammation in the retina and optic nerve. Additionally, in experimental models, the application of EVs as a delivery platform for therapeutic molecules has revealed great promise in the treatment of ocular disorders. However, the clinical translation of EV-based therapies faces several challenges, and further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to fully explore the therapeutic potential of EVs in ocular disorders and to address the challenges for their successful clinical translation. In this review, we will provide an overview of different types of EVs and their cargo, as well as the techniques used for their isolation and characterization. We will then review the preclinical and clinical studies that have explored the role of EVs in the treatment of ocular disorders, highlighting their therapeutic potential and the challenges that need to be addressed for their clinical translation. Finally, we will discuss the future directions of EV-based therapeutics in ocular disorders. Overall, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art of EV-based therapeutics in ophthalmic disorders, with a focus on their potential for nerve regeneration in ocular diseases.

Signaling mechanisms involved in the regulation of remyelination in multiple sclerosis: a mini review

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune neurodegenerative disease of the CNS that causes progressive disabilities, owing to CNS axon degeneration as a late result of demyelination. In the search for the prevention of axonal loss, mitigating inflammatory attacks in the CNS and myelin restoration are two possible approaches. As a result, therapies that target diverse signaling pathways involved in neuroprotection and remyelination have the potential to overcome the challenges in the development of multiple sclerosis treatments. LINGO1 (Leucine rich repeat and Immunoglobulin domain containing, Nogo receptor- interaction protein), AKT/PIP3/mTOR, Notch, Wnt, RXR (Retinoid X receptor gamma), and Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) signaling pathways are highlighted in this section. This article reviews the present knowledge regarding numerous signaling pathways and their functions in regulating remyelination in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. These pathways are potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in MS.

Nogo-A and LINGO-1: Two Important Targets for Remyelination and Regeneration

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that causes progressive neurological disability in most patients due to neurodegeneration. Activated immune cells infiltrate the CNS, triggering an inflammatory cascade that leads to demyelination and axonal injury. Non-inflammatory mechanisms are also involved in axonal degeneration, although they are not fully elucidated yet. Current therapies focus on immunosuppression; however, no therapies to promote regeneration, myelin repair, or maintenance are currently available. Two different negative regulators of myelination have been proposed as promising targets to induce remyelination and regeneration, namely the Nogo-A and LINGO-1 proteins. Although Nogo-A was first discovered as a potent neurite outgrowth inhibitor in the CNS, it has emerged as a multifunctional protein. It is involved in numerous developmental processes and is necessary for shaping and later maintaining CNS structure and functionality. However, the growth-restricting properties of Nogo-A have negative effects on CNS injury or disease. LINGO-1 is also an inhibitor of neurite outgrowth, axonal regeneration, oligodendrocyte differentiation, and myelin production. Inhibiting the actions of Nogo-A or LINGO-1 promotes remyelination both in vitro and in vivo, while Nogo-A or LINGO-1 antagonists have been suggested as promising therapeutic approaches for demyelinating diseases. In this review, we focus on these two negative regulators of myelination while also providing an overview of the available data on the effects of Nogo-A and LINGO-1 inhibition on oligodendrocyte differentiation and remyelination.

Multiple Sclerosis: Inflammatory and Neuroglial Aspects

Multiple sclerosis (MS) represents the most common acquired demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). Its pathogenesis, in parallel with the well-established role of mechanisms pertaining to autoimmunity, involves several key functions of immune, glial and nerve cells. The disease's natural history is complex, heterogeneous and may evolve over a relapsing-remitting (RRMS) or progressive (PPMS/SPMS) course. Acute inflammation, driven by infiltration of peripheral cells in the CNS, is thought to be the most relevant process during the earliest phases and in RRMS, while disruption in glial and neural cells of pathways pertaining to energy metabolism, survival cascades, synaptic and ionic homeostasis are thought to be mostly relevant in long-standing disease, such as in progressive forms. In this complex scenario, many mechanisms originally thought to be distinctive of neurodegenerative disorders are being increasingly recognized as crucial from the beginning of the disease. The present review aims at highlighting mechanisms in common between MS, autoimmune diseases and biology of neurodegenerative disorders. In fact, there is an unmet need to explore new targets that might be involved as master regulators of autoimmunity, inflammation and survival of nerve cells.

Targeting the Brain with Single-Domain Antibodies: Greater Potential Than Stated So Far?

Treatments for central nervous system diseases with therapeutic antibodies have been increasingly investigated over the last decades, leading to some approved monoclonal antibodies for brain disease therapies. The detection of biomarkers for diagnosis purposes with non-invasive antibody-based imaging approaches has also been explored in brain cancers. However, antibodies generally display a low capability of reaching the brain, as they do not efficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. As an alternative, recent studies have focused on single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) that correspond to the antigen-binding fragment. While some reports indicate that the brain uptake of these small antibodies is still low, the number of studies reporting brain-penetrating sdAbs is increasing. In this review, we provide an overview of methods used to assess or evaluate brain penetration of sdAbs and discuss the pros and cons that could affect the identification of brain-penetrating sdAbs of therapeutic or diagnostic interest.

Nucleic Acids as Novel Therapeutic Modalities to Address Multiple Sclerosis Onset and Progression

The issue of treating Multiple Sclerosis (MS) begins with disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) which may cause lymphopenia, dyspnea, and many other adverse effects. Consequently, further identification and evaluation of alternative treatments are crucial to monitoring their long-term outcomes and hopefully, moving toward personalized approaches that can be translated into clinical treatments. In this article, we focused on the novel therapeutic modalities that alter the interaction between the cellular constituents contributing to MS onset and progression. Furthermore, the studies that have been performed to evaluate and optimize drugs' efficacy, and particularly, to show their limitations and strengths are also presented. The preclinical trials of novel approaches for multiple sclerosis treatment provide promising prospects to cure the disease with pinpoint precision. Considering the fact that not a single treatment could be effective enough to cover all aspects of MS treatment, additional researches and therapies need to be developed in the future. Since the pathophysiology of MS resembles a jigsaw puzzle, researchers need to put a host of pieces together to create a promising window towards MS treatment. Thus, a combination therapy encompassing all these modules is highly likely to succeed in dealing with the disease. The use of different therapeutic approaches to re-induce self-tolerance in autoreactive cells contributing to MS pathogenesis is presented. A Combination therapy using these tools may help to deal with the clinical disabilities and symptoms of the disease in the future.

Nimodipine Exerts Beneficial Effects on the Rat Oligodendrocyte Cell Line OLN-93

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Therapy is currently limited to drugs that interfere with the immune system; treatment options that primarily mediate neuroprotection and prevent neurodegeneration are not available. Here, we studied the effects of nimodipine on the rat cell line OLN-93, which resembles young mature oligodendrocytes. Nimodipine is a dihydropyridine that blocks the voltage-gated L-type calcium channel family members Cav1.2 and Cav1.3. Our data show that the treatment of OLN-93 cells with nimodipine induced the upregulation of myelin genes, in particular of proteolipid protein 1 (Plp1), which was confirmed by a significantly greater expression of PLP1 in immunofluorescence analysis and the presence of myelin structures in the cytoplasm at the ultrastructural level. Whole-genome RNA sequencing additionally revealed the upregulation of genes that are involved in neuroprotection, remyelination, and antioxidation pathways. Interestingly, the observed effects were independent of Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 because OLN-93 cells do not express these channels, and there was no measurable response pattern in patch-clamp analysis. Taking into consideration previous studies that demonstrated a beneficial effect of nimodipine on microglia, our data support the notion that nimodipine is an interesting drug candidate for the treatment of MS and other demyelinating diseases.

What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?

In the past two decades, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, a remarkable number of mAbs failed due to negative study results were withdrawn because of unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs) or due to studies being halted for other reasons. While trials with positive outcomes are usually published in prestigious journals, negative trials are merely published as abstracts or not at all. This review summarizes MS mAbs that have either failed in phase II-III trials, have been interrupted for various reasons, or withdrawn from the market since 2015. The main conclusions that can be drawn from these 'negative' experiences are as follows. mAbs that have been proven to be safe in other autoimmune conditions, will not have the same safety profile in MS due to immunopathogenetic differences in these diseases (e.g., daclizumab). Identification of SAEs in clinical trials is difficult highlighting the importance of phase IV studies. Memory B cells are central players in MS immunopathogenesis (e.g., tabalumab). The pathophysiological mechanisms of disease progression are independent of leukocyte 'outside-in' traffic which drives relapses in MS. Therefore, therapies for progressive MS must be able to sufficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. Sufficiently long trial duration and multicomponent outcome measures are important for clinical studies in progressive MS. The success of trials on remyelination-promoting therapies mainly depends on the sufficient high dose of mAb, the optimal readout for 'proof of concept', time of treatment initiation, and appropriate selection of patients. Failed strategies are highly important to better understand assumed immunopathophysiological mechanisms and optimizing future trial designs.