Breast-conserving therapy is safe both within BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers with breast cancer in the Chinese population

Pedigree analysis exploring the inconsistency between diverse phenotypes and testing criteria for germline TP53 mutations in Chinese women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

In the present study, we addressed the inconsistency between the testing criteria and diverse phenotypes for germline TP53 mutation in patients with breast cancer in the Chinese population.

METHOD

We proposed a new added item (synchronous or metachronous bilateral breast cancer) as one of the testing criteria (aimed at high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes) and applied it for determining TP53 germline mutation status in 420 female patients with breast cancer using multigene panel-based next-generation sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

We found that 1.4% of patients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline TP53 mutation. Compared with BRCA mutation carriers (8.0%) and non-carriers (7.1%), TP53 mutation carriers (33.3%) developed breast cancer earlier. The majority of TP53 mutation carriers (66.7%) developed breast cancer after age 30 and had bilateral breast cancer (33.3%). Pedigree investigation of four TP53 carriers and a patient with a TP53 variant of unknown significance revealed that neither of their parents harbored the same mutations as the probands, indicating that the mutations might occur de novo.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed distinguishing features of TP53 carriers among Chinese women with breast cancer, which is inconsistent with the currently used testing criteria; therefore, the newly proposed testing criteria may be more appropriate.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer were updated and published online in 2023, and adapted, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with early breast cancer. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with breast cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and KSMO. The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian regions represented by the 10 oncological societies. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with early breast cancer across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling, as well as the age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different regions of Asia.

Is Breast Conserving Surgery Efficacious in Breast Cancer Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Germline Mutation?

Background

The optimal surgical therapy for newly diagnosed breast cancer with germline mutations in susceptibility genes is still uncertain for many physicians. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of breast conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by assessing its outcomes and locoregional recurrence (LR) rates.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-five patients operated with BCS or mastectomy for breast cancer between 2006 and 2017 and had BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were included in the study. Effects of the performed breast surgery and clinicopathological characteristics on surgical outcomes, LR rates and survival were analyzed with showing the distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations.

Results

The median age of the patients was 42 years (20-77). BRCA1 mutations were found in 46 (61.3%) patients and BRCA2 mutations in 29 (38.7%) patients. Compared to BRCA2 carriers, BRCA1 carriers were more likely to have higher tumor grade (84.8% vs 44.8%; p = 0.001) and non-luminal subtype tumors (67.4% vs 13.8%; p = 0.001). A total of 44 (58.7%) patients underwent unilateral mastectomy and 31 (41.3%) patients underwent BCS. At a median follow-up time of 60 (12-240) months, LR was observed in 6 patients equally divided in both BCS and mastectomy groups. LR rates were slightly higher after BCS versus mastectomy (9.7% and 6.8%, respectively). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates after 10 years in the BCS group versus the mastectomy group (p = 0.117 and 0.109, respectively), but in fact, the rates were better in the BCS group.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that BCS may serve as an efficacious alternative to mastectomy for breast cancer patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Additionally, tumor size, lymph node positivity, and TNM stage should be taken into consideration for a better surgical decision-making.

Surgical Management of Inherited Breast Cancer: Role of Breast-Conserving Surgery

Recent studies have demonstrated that hereditary breast cancer (BC) has a prevalence of 5-10% among all BC diagnoses. Nowadays, significant technological advances in the identification of an increasingly broad spectrum of genetic mutations allow for the discovery of an ever-growing number of inherited pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants of breast cancer susceptibility genes. As the management of BC patients carrying mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes or other high-penetrance genes is currently a challenge, extensive research is being carried out and a lively scientific debate has been taking place on what the most appropriate local therapy, especially surgical treatment, of patients with inherited BC should be. In many studies, BC outcomes in BRCA carriers and non-carriers have been compared. A number of them showed that, when compared with mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery in BRCA patients is oncologically safe in terms of overall survival, although an increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence was reported. In these patients, devising a specific therapeutic strategy is an inevitably complex process, as it must take into consideration a series of factors, require a multimodal approach, guarantee personalization, strictly adhere to scientific international guidelines, and consider all available evidence. The present narrative review purposes to identify and illustrate evidence from significant selected studies that discussed those issues, as well as to suggest useful tools to clinicians managing this specific clinical condition in daily clinical practice.

Effect of breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy versus mastectomy on breast cancer-specific survival for early-stage contralateral breast cancer

Background

Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy is recommended in most women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer. However, its role in contralateral breast cancer (CBC) patients remains unclear. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) outcomes after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in women with early-stage (T1-2N0-1M0) CBC.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. BCSS was analyzed using the log-rank method, competing risks regression model, and propensity score matching method.

Results

A total of 9,336 early-stage CBC patients were included. After multivariable adjustment, no significant difference in BCSS was found between early-stage CBC patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and those undergoing mastectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.37, P=0.329]. BCSS was similar in both treatment groups and in the subgroups stratified by age at first primary breast cancer or CBC diagnosis (≤50, 51-60, and >60 years), time interval between cancers (<0.25, 0.25-4, 5-9, and ≤10 years), stage of first primary breast cancer, T classification of CBC, histology and hormone receptors status of both cancers (all P>0.05). Among patients with N1 disease at CBC diagnosis, breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy was associated with a boundary significantly improved BCSS (HR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.00-2.12, P=0.050). Among patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery for first primary cancer, bilateral mastectomy for contralateral cancer did not improve BCSS compared with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in BCSS between breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and mastectomy plus radiotherapy (P>0.05). Stable results were obtained after propensity score matching.

Conclusions

Breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy did not significantly influence BCSS outcomes of patients with early-stage CBC. Bilateral mastectomy and mastectomy plus radiotherapy did not confer a survival advantage over breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy in these patients. Future prospective studies are necessary to expand on these results.

Breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer with BRCA mutations: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancer accounts for 3 to 12% of all women with breast cancer and significantly increases the lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, the optimal local treatment for breast cancer with BRCA germline mutation remains controversial. Here we present a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) on the prognosis of breast cancer with BRCA mutation.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant studies on BCT and BRCA mutated breast cancer. Fixed or random effect models were used for meta-analyses based on whether significant heterogeneity existed among included studies. Funnel plot and Begg's test were employed for the evaluation of publication bias.

RESULTS

Totally, four studies with five cohorts and a totally 1254 patients were included for meta-analyses. The BCT group involved more T0/T1 (BCT 63.7% Vs. M 48.9%, p < 0.001), N0 (BCT 70.5% Vs. M 56.2%, p < 0.001) and ER negative (BCT 58.8% Vs. M 49.3% p < 0.01) tumors than M group. Patients who received M tended to have prophylactic contralateral mastectomy (BCT 16.5% Vs. M 35.8%, p < 0.001). BCT had a significant higher risk for local recurrence than M (HR 3.838, 95% CI = 2.376-6.201, p < 0.001). The pooled results revealed no significant impact of BCT on disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis suggested that BCT had increasing local recurrence risk, but did not significantly impact patient survival in terms of DFS, MFS, BCSS and OS. BCT may serve as a safe alternative to mastectomy for breast cancer with BRCA mutation. Further high-quality randomized control trials are warranted to explore the optimal surgical management for BRCA mutation carriers.

Surgical management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers with breast cancer: a recent literature review and current state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of breast cancer patients carrying pathogenic variants (PV) on breast cancer genes (BRCA) 1 and 2 has changed throughout the last decade due to growing availability of genetic testing, and has shifted towards the diffusion of bilateral mastectomy. Today's scenario however is in further evolution because of emerging data that suggest a personalized modulation of treatment. In this work we aimed to gather recent evidence supporting a prophylactic or conservative surgical approach in order to define the state of the art in today's treatment of BRCA carriers with breast cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed the literature to identify studies providing evidence on surgical treatment in breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 and 2 PVs. We included articles comparing outcomes between patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy, and articles investigating contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM), with a particular focus on recent literature. International guidelines were also reviewed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Optimal surgical management of BRCA PV carriers with breast cancer remains controversial. While the introduction of routine genetic testing has initially led surgeons to favor more radical treatments, recent literature provides evidence that a conservative approach is safe and feasible in selected cases. Guidelines are heterogeneous and provide guidance without constraining the surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should undergo adequate genetic and surgical counseling in order to receive the best tailored surgical treatment. Because guidelines vary in different countries and provide no definite protocol, they highlight the importance of accurate surgical planning. Clinical, familial and psychosocial factors should be taken into account when approaching a BRCA PV carrier with breast cancer, in order to guarantee the best evidence-based patient care in an era of personalized treatment.

Comparison of Survival After Breast-Conserving Therapy vs Mastectomy Among Patients With or Without the BRCA1/2 Variant in a Large Series of Unselected Chinese Patients With Breast Cancer

Importance

Whether patients with breast cancer who carry a BRCA1/2 variant can safely undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) remains controversial.

Objective

To compare survival rates after BCT vs mastectomy in BRCA1/2 variant carriers and noncarriers in a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, a large consecutive series of 8396 unselected patients with primary breast cancer underwent either BCT, mastectomy with radiotherapy, or mastectomy alone from October 1, 2003, to May 31, 2015, at the Breast Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital in China. All patients were assessed for BRCA1/2 germline variant status. Statistical analysis was performed from May 1 to September 30, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

Results

Of these 8396 Chinese patients (8378 women [99.8% women]; mean [SD] age, 50.8 [11.4] years; 187 BRCA1 carriers, 304 BRCA2 carriers, and 7905 noncarriers), 3135 (37.3%) received BCT, 1511 (18.0%) received mastectomy with radiotherapy, and 3750 (44.7%) received mastectomy alone. After a median follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 0.3-16.6 years), both BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant carriers treated with BCT had similar rates of survival compared with those treated with mastectomy with radiotherapy (BCSS: hazard ratio [HR] for BRCA1, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.16-2.10]; P = .41; HR for BRCA2, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.15-1.41]; P = .17; OS: HR for BRCA1, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.18-2.12]; P = .44; HR for BRCA2, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.26-1.96]; P = .52) or mastectomy alone (BCSS: HR for BRCA1, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.22-2.20]; P = .54; HR for BRCA2, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.18-1.93]; P = .39; OS: HR for BRCA1, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.27-2.21]; P = .63; HR for BRCA2, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.22-1.73]; P = .37) after adjusting for clinicopathologic factors and adjuvant therapy. For noncarriers, patients receiving BCT had significantly better survival than those receiving mastectomy with radiotherapy (BCSS: HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.36-0.57]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.58]; P < .001) or mastectomy alone (BCSS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57-0.89]; P = .003; OS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.58-0.87]; P < .001) in multivariable analyses.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that BRCA1/2 variant carriers treated with BCT have survival rates at least comparable to those treated with mastectomy with radiotherapy or mastectomy alone and that BCT could be an option for BRCA1/2 variant carriers when the tumor is clinically appropriate for BCT.

Combined breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy for BRCA mutation carriers - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The non-inferiority of combined breast conservation surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (breast conservation therapy or BCT) compared to mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer cases is well recognised. Uncertainty remains regarding optimal surgical practice in BRCA mutation carriers.

AIMS

To evaluate the oncological safety of combined BCT versus mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers following breast cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Observational studies comparing BCS and mastectomy in BRCA carriers were identified. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Log hazard ratios (lnHR) for locoregional recurrence (LRR), contralateral breast cancer, disease-free and overall survival and their standard errors were calculated from Kaplan-Meier or cox-regression analyses and pooled using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Twenty three studies of 3807 patients met inclusion criteria; 2200 (57.7%) were BRCA1 and 1212 (31.8%) were BRCA2 carriers. Median age at diagnosis was 41 years with 96 months follow up. BCS was performed on 2157 (56.7%) while 1408 (41.5%) underwent mastectomy. An increased risk of LRR was observed in patients treated with BCS (HR:4.54, 95% Confidence Interval: 2.77-7.42, P < 0.001, heterogeneity (I2) = 0%). However, the risks of contralateral breast cancer (HR:1.51, 95%CI: 0.44-5.11, P = 0.510, I2 = 80%), disease recurrence (HR:1.16, 95%CI: 0.78-1.72, P = 0.470, I2 = 44%), disease-specific recurrence (HR:1.58, 95%CI: 0.79-3.15, P = 0.200, I2 = 38%) and death (HR:1.10, 95%CI: 0.72-1.69, P = 0.660, I2 = 38%) were equivalent for combined BCT and mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival outcomes following combined BCT is comparable to mastectomy in BRCA carriers. However, the risk of LRR is increased. Patient counselling should be tailored to incorporate these findings.