1
|
Shaffrey EC, Ly N, Seitz AJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Poore SO, Michelotti BF. Evaluation of Morphometric Measurements on Preoperative CT Angiograms to Determine Risk of Abdominal Donor Site Complications-A Retrospective Review of 174 Patients. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2024; 32:434-444. [PMID: 39104940 PMCID: PMC11298133 DOI: 10.1177/22925503221128987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Autologous breast reconstruction remains a popular surgical option following mastectomy; however, it is not without complications. Preoperative CT angiograms (CTAs) are often obtained for surgical planning, and morphometric data such as fat and muscle distribution can be measured. This study aimed to assess if CTA morphometric data predicts abdominal donor site complications in patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction from 2013 to 2018. Along with population and operative characteristics, preoperative morphometric variables were assessed for the following: subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, skeletal muscle area and index, rectus and psoas cross-sectional area, and bone density. Statistical comparison to abdominal donor site complications was performed using logistic regression analysis for every 100-unit change. Results: A total of 174 patients were included in this study. Visceral adipose tissue was significantly associated with the development of infection (P = .005), epidermolysis (P = .031), and seroma (P = .04). Subcutaneous adipose tissue, skeletal muscle index, cross-sectional muscle area, and bone density were not associated with abdominal donor site complications. Obesity (P = .024), history of smoking (P = .049), and the number of perforators harvested (P = .035) significantly increased the likelihood of delayed abdominal healing. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that increased visceral adipose tissue, as measured by CTA, is significantly associated with an increased risk of abdominal donor site complications. CTA morphometric data and identifying high-risk patient characteristics can help guide preoperative counseling and better inform surgical risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen C. Shaffrey
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nancy Ly
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Allison J. Seitz
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Timothy J. Ziemlewicz
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Samuel O. Poore
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brett F. Michelotti
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silverstein ML, Momeni A. Long-Term Outcomes following Hybrid Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154:217e-223e. [PMID: 37566525 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid breast reconstruction combines free tissue transfer with implant placement. Various mesh products have been successfully used to secure the implant position in these reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigate the impact of mesh type on long-term outcomes following hybrid breast reconstruction. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients with at least 24 months of follow-up after immediate bilateral prepectoral hybrid breast reconstruction was performed. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate long-term outcomes and compare breasts reconstructed with polyglactin mesh versus acellular dermal matrix (ADM). RESULTS Thirty-nine patients (78 breasts) who underwent hybrid breast reconstruction with an average follow-up period of 50.4 months (range, 27 to 73 months) were included in the study. Postoperative complications included hematoma ( n = 2 [2.6%]), mastectomy skin necrosis ( n = 12 [15.4%]), and fat necrosis ( n = 6 [7.7%]). There were no instances of implant infection, implant exposure, or flap failure. Polyglactin mesh and ADM were used in 24 breasts and 54 breasts, respectively. Implant malposition and capsular contracture occurred more frequently in the polyglactin cohort leading to 10 (41.7%) instances of reoperation for implant replacement compared with only 1 (1.9%) in the ADM cohort ( P < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, polyglactin mesh was associated with a 36-fold greater probability of requiring implant replacement compared with ADM ( P = 0.006). CONCLUSION ADM (versus polyglactin mesh) is associated with lower rates of capsular contracture and implant malposition in the context of hybrid breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max L Silverstein
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Arash Momeni
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hackenberger PN, Stockslager C, Selimos B, Teven C, Fracol M, Howard M. Early Experience with Mesh Suture for DIEP Flap Abdominal Site Closures. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e6095. [PMID: 39175518 PMCID: PMC11340925 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000006095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
Background The gold standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap. As techniques have evolved, DIEP flaps have significantly reduced the morbidity previously caused by transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. However, abdominal wall complications continue to persist after DIEP flap surgery, with bulge rates reported as high as 33%. Methods The first 25 patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery with the use of Duramesh (MSI, Chicago, Ill.) by the senior author were identified. A retrospective chart review of patient and surgical details was performed. Charts were reviewed for outcomes, including surgical site infections, surgical site events, incisional hernia formation, and/or bulge. Standard descriptive summary statistics were used for patient characteristics, surgical details, and primary and secondary outcomes. Results Twenty-five patients were reviewed. Average follow-up duration was 216 ± 39 days. One patient (4%) developed a surgical site infection, and four patients (16%) developed a surgical site event. One patient developed a bulge, but no patients developed an incisional hernia. Conclusions Duramesh mesh suture provides a promising opportunity for DIEP surgeons to minimize both abdominal wall morbidity and mesh-related complications. Mesh suture can be used in a similar fashion as other sutures to perform primary closure of the anterior rectus sheath while also providing force-distribution benefits typically unique to planar mesh. This pilot study suggests that Duramesh is a safe, simple alternative to existing techniques in DIEP flap surgery and can be considered by microsurgeons to reduce fascial dehiscence, bulge, and/or hernia formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige N. Hackenberger
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Caitlin Stockslager
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Brianna Selimos
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Chad Teven
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Megan Fracol
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Michael Howard
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Svee A, Sjökvist O, Unukovych D, Gumuscu R, Moradi M, Falk-Delgado A, Mani M. Long-term Donor Site-related Quality of Life after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e6011. [PMID: 39081813 PMCID: PMC11288614 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000006011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Current knowledge about patients' perceptions of the donor site following abdominal-based breast reconstruction and its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) several years after breast reconstruction is limited. This study aimed to assess the long-term effects of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction on HRQoL, specifically focusing on the abdomen and donor site aspects. Methods This retrospective cohort study compared 66 women who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between 2000 and 2007 with a matched control cohort of 114 women who underwent therapeutic mastectomies without reconstruction in the year 2005. The DIEP cohort of patients completed the BREAST-Q Reconstruction module during an outpatient visit in 2015-2016. The control cohort completed the same questionnaire online in 2016. Results The follow-up time was at least 8 years (mean 11.4 ± 1.6 years) postreconstruction for the DIEP cohort and 10 years postmastectomy (mean 11.0 ± 0.3 years) for the control cohort. In the DIEP cohort, 93% reported no donor site pain, 89% had no difficulty sitting up, and 91% had no activity limitations 2 weeks before completing the survey. Patients undergoing DIEP were more satisfied with their abdominal appearance than the control group (adjusted OR, 5.7; 95% confidence interval 1.8-17.6). Conclusions A decade postoperatively, DIEP breast reconstruction yields high abdominal donor site satisfaction, with comparable abdominal physical well-being to nonreconstructed women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Svee
- From the Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Olivia Sjökvist
- From the Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Dmytro Unukovych
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rojda Gumuscu
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mardin Moradi
- From the Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Alberto Falk-Delgado
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Mani
- From the Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berkane Y, Tawa P, Guinier C, Bertheuil N, El Batti S, Lellouch AG. Reconstruction of a septic femoral triangle fistula with a pedicled DIEP flap: A case report and mini-review. ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH 2024; 69:233-238. [PMID: 37932173 DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Flap-based reconstruction techniques have shown promise in preventing scar contractures and enhancing healing in fold areas by providing vascularized and thick tissue. We report a septic rupture of the superficial femoral artery treated with an arterial allograft and covered with a contralateral pedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flap. The patient presented favorable outcomes, including optimal healing at 8 months, with no functional limitation. A literature review also discusses alternative pedicled perforator flaps. These modern techniques present several advantages, including reliability, and can be of great interest in complex vascular surgery cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Berkane
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, United States; Shriners Children's Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Rennes University Hospital Center, Rennes, France.
| | - P Tawa
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, United States; Shriners Children's Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - C Guinier
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, United States; Shriners Children's Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - N Bertheuil
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Rennes University Hospital Center, Rennes, France
| | - S El Batti
- Department of Vascular Surgery, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMRS 1140 Innovation thérapeutique en hémostase, université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - A G Lellouch
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA, United States; Shriners Children's Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finkelstein ER, Ali AMM, Holton T, Slavin B, Taghioff S, Mella-Catinchi J, Singh D. Initial Experience with Unidirectional Barbed Suture for Abdominal Donor Site Closure in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5681. [PMID: 38528844 PMCID: PMC10962887 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Background The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a predominant technique for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the best method of abdominal fascial closure in this technique is not well defined. This study details our initial experience with unidirectional barbed suture-only repair of abdominal donor site fascia. Methods Patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and abdominal fascial closure with Stratafix Symmetric Polydioxanone PDS Plus were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding pertinent patient history, medical comorbidities, risk factors, and surgical technique was extracted, along with the incidence of eight separate postoperative abdominal surgical site occurrences. Results Retrospective review identified 43 patients who underwent 19 unilateral and 24 bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedures (n = 67). Average patient follow-up was 791 days (range 153-1769). Six patients (14%) had a complication of the donor site. Seroma was most frequent (n = 3, 7%), followed by surgical site infection (n = 2, 5%). One patient had incisional dehiscence (2%) and another patient developed bulging (2%). No patients had chronic pain, weakness, hematoma, or hernia postoperatively. Patients with donor site complications had a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery significantly more often than the patients without donor site complications (100% versus 49%; P = 0.032). Conclusions Abdominal fascial repair with Stratafix Symmetric suture alone led to low rates of abdominal donor site morbidity, including no hernia and rare bulging, following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Additional advantages of this technique may be reduced operative times and lower operative costs compared with alternative methods of fascial repair, although prospective and randomized studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R. Finkelstein
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla
| | - Abdel-Moneim Mohamed Ali
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Luminis Health-Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Md
| | - Tripp Holton
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Luminis Health-Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Md
| | - Benjamin Slavin
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla
| | - Susan Taghioff
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla
| | - Juan Mella-Catinchi
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla
| | - Devinder Singh
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fisher MH, Ohmes LB, Yang JH, Le E, Colakoglu S, French M, Siddikoglu D, Um G, Winocour J, Higdon K, Perdikis G, Inchauste S, Cohen J, Chong T, Kaoutzanis C, Mathes DW. Abdominal donor-site complications following autologous breast reconstruction: A multi-institutional multisurgeon study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 90:88-94. [PMID: 38364673 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap is the gold standard procedure for autologous breast reconstruction. Although breast-related complications have been well described, donor-site complications and contributing patient risk factors are poorly understood. METHODS We examined a multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing DIEP free flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020. We evaluated patient demographics, operative details, and abdominal donor-site complications. Logistic regression modeling was used to predict donor-site outcomes based on patient characteristics. RESULTS A total of 661 patients were identified who underwent DIEP free flap breast reconstruction across multiple institutions. Using logistic regression modeling, we found that body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for umbilical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.18, p = 0.001), seroma (OR 1.07, CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.003), wound dehiscence (OR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.15, p = 0.001), and surgical site infection (OR 1.10, CI 1.05-1.15, p = 0.001) following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Further, immediate reconstruction decreases the risk of abdominal bulge formation (OR 0.22, CI 0.108-0.429, p = 0.001). Perforator selection was not associated with abdominal morbidity in our study population. CONCLUSIONS Higher BMI is associated with increased abdominal donor-site complications following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Efforts to lower preoperative BMI may help decrease donor-site complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlie H Fisher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Lucas B Ohmes
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jerry H Yang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Elliot Le
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Salih Colakoglu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Mackenzie French
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Duygu Siddikoglu
- Department of Biostatistics, Canakkale OnSekiz Mart Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale, Turkey
| | - Grace Um
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Julian Winocour
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kent Higdon
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Galen Perdikis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Suzanne Inchauste
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Justin Cohen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Tae Chong
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - David W Mathes
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jang BS, Chun SJ, Choi HS, Chang JH, Shin KH. Estimating the risk and benefit of radiation therapy in (y)pN1 stage breast cancer patients: A Bayesian network model incorporating expert knowledge (KROG 22-13). COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 245:108049. [PMID: 38295597 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit of (y)pN1 breast cancer patients in a Bayesian network model. METHOD We developed a Bayesian network (BN) model comprising three parts: pretreatment, intervention, and risk/benefit. The pretreatment part consisted of clinical information from a tertiary medical center. The intervention part regarded the field of radiotherapy. The risk/benefit component encompasses radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects and effectiveness, including factors such as recurrence, cardiac toxicity, lymphedema, and radiation pneumonitis. These factors were evaluated in terms of disability weights and probabilities from a nationwide expert survey. The overall disease burden (ODB) was calculated as the sum of the probability multiplied by the disability weight. A higher value of ODB indicates a greater disease burden for the patient. RESULTS Among the 58 participants, a BN model utilizing discretization and clustering techniques revealed five distinct clusters. Overall, factors associated with breast reconstruction and RT exhibited high discrepancies (24-34 %), while RT-related side effects demonstrated low discrepancies (3-11 %) among the experts. When incorporating recurrence and RT-related side effects, the mean ODB of (y)pN1 patients was 0.258 (range, 0.244-0.337), with a higher tendency observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or mastectomy cases. The ODB for TNBC patients undergoing mastectomy without postmastectomy radiotherapy was 0.327, whereas for non-TNBC patients undergoing breast conserving surgery with RT, the disease burden was 0.251. There was an increasing trend in ODB as the field of RT increased. CONCLUSION We developed a Bayesian network model based on an expert survey, which helps to understand treatment patterns and enables precise estimations of RT-related risk and benefit in (y)pN1 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bum-Sup Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok-Joo Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyeon Seok Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perez K, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. To Ablate or Not to Ablate: Does Umbilectomy Decrease Donor-Site Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:305-314. [PMID: 37166049 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving outcomes for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is an evolving area of interest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of umbilectomy in abdominally based breast reconstruction. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent autologous DIEP flap breast reconstruction at an academic center between January of 2015 and December of 2021 performed by one of two reconstructive surgeons. The primary outcome variable was abdominal donor-site complications. A secondary outcome variable was treatment outcomes for complications. Covariates included demographic information, comorbidities, cancer treatment, and smoking. RESULTS A total of 408 patients underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction, with 194 (47.5%) undergoing umbilectomy. Umbilectomy resulted in decreased number of total wounds per patient (0.35 ± 0.795) compared with umbilical preservation (0.75 ± 1.322; P < 0.001), as well as decreased associated risk of any reported wounds (OR, 0.530; P = 0.009). Associations that trended toward significance occurred between umbilectomy and minor wound separation and partial necrosis, with both showing decreased risk. A significant association was noted between umbilectomy and donor-site seroma [χ 2 (1) = 6.348; P = 0.016], showing an increased risk (OR, 5.761). CONCLUSIONS Umbilectomy should be discussed with patients and considered as a part of DIEP flap breast reconstruction given the reduction in the risk of abdominal donor-site wounds. Although umbilectomy decreases the rate of wounds, it can increase the risk of seroma; therefore, other interventions, such as progressive tension sutures, may be explored to aid in reducing seroma and improving wound healing. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Perez
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Sumeet S Teotia
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Nicholas T Haddock
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lakatta AC, Steppe C, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Reduction in Seroma Rate Following Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap with Umbilectomy Utilizing Progressive Tension Sutures. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40:118-122. [PMID: 37142253 DOI: 10.1055/a-2086-0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Umbilectomy has been implemented in both abdominoplasties and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps to improve abdominal wound healing and better control the location of the neoumbilicus; however, seroma rates are increased. The objective of this study is to compare the seroma rate following DIEP flap reconstruction with umbilectomy when progressive tension sutures (PTS) are implemented. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate postoperative seroma rates in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction at a single academic institution between January 2015 and September 2022. All procedures were performed by two senior surgeons. Patients were included if their umbilicus was removed intraoperatively. PTS were utilized in all abdominal closures beginning in late February 2022. Demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 241 patients underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction with intraoperative umbilectomy. Forty-three consecutive patients received PTS. Overall complications were significantly lower in those who received PTS (p = 0.007). There were no abdominal seromas (0%) in patients who received PTS, whereas 14 (7.1%) occurred without PTS. The use of PTS conferred a decreased likelihood of abdominal seroma (5.687× lower risk, p = 0.017). Additionally, wound formation was significantly lower in those who received PTS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION The use of PTS in the abdominal closure during DIEP flap reconstruction addresses the previously seen rise in seroma rates when concomitant umbilectomy is performed. Decrease in both donor-site wounds and now seroma rates reaffirm the efficacy of removing the umbilicus to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis C Lakatta
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Cyrus Steppe
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sumeet S Teotia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nicholas T Haddock
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khalil AA, ElSharkawy OA, Alsharkawy K, Youssif S, Khalil HH. Supra-arcuate free fascial MS-TRAM, a modified technique to reduce donor site morbidity in obese population-comparative study. Microsurgery 2024; 44:e31124. [PMID: 37846651 DOI: 10.1002/micr.31124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdomen-based free flaps represent the gold standard option in the armamentarium of breast reconstruction. The natural evolution to more preservation with less invasive forms of these flaps has been driven by both patient and surgeon satisfaction. Nevertheless, obese patients are challenging due to the increased risk of compromised flap perfusion and donor site morbidity. This challenge is compounded by the prevalence of obesity worldwide, resulting in more free abdominal flaps being performed for breast reconstruction in obese patients. The authors present the outcomes of a modified supra-arcuate fascial muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (FMS-TRAM) technique compared to standard muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) technique to reduce the donor site morbidity while providing a well-vascularized large volume of autologous tissue. METHODS A retrospective comparative data analysis was conducted at two centers: Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt, and University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom. Standard MS-TRAM was performed in 65 patients between 2008 and 2011 (Group 1) versus 275 patients between 2011 and 2020 (Group 2) who underwent FMS-TRAM. The modified technique involved limiting the fascial incision to above or at the level of the arcuate line to preserve the integrity of the anterior rectus sheath caudally. All patients included were of the obese population (BMI≥30 kg/m2 ) and underwent unilateral post-mastectomy reconstruction. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes focusing on donor site morbidity and flap complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS The median age and BMI for Group 1 were 43 and 32, respectively. While for Group 2, they were 47 and 33, respectively. Flap weight ranged from 560 to 1470 g (Mean 705) for Group 1, while Group 2 ranged from 510 to 1560 (mean 715). The majority (280/340 [82%]) of the patients in both groups received radiotherapy. 7.7% of Group 1 were smokers, while in Group 2 it was 4.7%. The percentage of delayed versus immediate reconstruction in Group 1 was 60%/40%, while in Group 2, it was 43%/56%. The incidence of fat necrosis, partial necrosis, and total necrosis was 7.6%.1.5%, and 3%, respectively, for Group 1 and 8%, 1.4%, and 2.6%, respectively, for Group 2. The two-tailed p-value demonstrated a significant statistical difference (p < 0.00001) in donor site morbidity between both groups, with more bulge 20% (13/65) and hernia 1.5% (2/65) occurrence in Group 1 versus 1.9% (5/275) and 0.7% (2/275) in Group 2 respectively, over a follow-up period ranging from 24 to 60 months (mean 32). CONCLUSION FMS-TRAM flaps are safe, robust, and reliable with less donor site morbidity while maintaining optimal flap perfusion for large volume flaps in obese patients with excellent, durable outcomes. It should be considered a valuable tool in the reconstructive armamentarium of breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf A Khalil
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Omar A ElSharkawy
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Kareem Alsharkawy
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sherif Youssif
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK
| | - Haitham H Khalil
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, University Hospitals, Birmingham, UK
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim J, Lee KT, Mun GH. Short Fasciotomy-Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:972e-984e. [PMID: 36877746 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite several technical modifications to further reduce donor invasiveness in harvesting deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, techniques with general applicability and demonstrating clinical benefits are scarce. The present study aimed to introduce a short-fasciotomy technique and evaluate its reliability, efficacy, and applicability by comparison with those of conventional methods. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted with 304 consecutive patients who underwent DIEP flap-based breast reconstruction. A total of 180 patients underwent the conventional technique between October of 2015 and December of 2018 (cohort 1), and in 124 patients, the short-fasciotomy technique was implemented between January of 2019 and September of 2021 (cohort 2). In the short-fasciotomy technique, the rectus fascia was incised as much as overlies the intramuscular course of targeted perforators. After intramuscular dissection, pedicle dissection proceeded without additional fasciotomy. Postoperative complications and fasciotomy-saving benefits were compared. RESULTS The short-fasciotomy technique was successfully adapted for all patients in cohort 2, regardless of length of intramuscular course and number of harvested perforators, with no case requiring conversion to the conventional technique. The mean fasciotomy incision length in cohort 2 was 6.6 cm, which was significantly shorter than that in cohort 1 (11.1 cm). The mean length of the harvested pedicle in cohort 2 was 12.6 cm. No flap loss occurred in either group. The rate of other perfusion-related complications did not differ between the two groups. The rate of abdominal bulge/hernia was significantly lower in cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS The short-fasciotomy technique allows for less invasive DIEP flap harvest regardless of anatomical variability. It provides reliable outcomes with minimal functional donor-site morbidity. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jisu Kim
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Kyeong-Tae Lee
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Goo-Hyun Mun
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parmeshwar N, Lem M, Dugan CL, Piper M. Evaluating mesh use for abdominal donor site closure after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2023; 43:855-864. [PMID: 37697962 DOI: 10.1002/micr.31107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite improvement in abdominal morbidity with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction compared to prior abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction, abdominal bulge, and hernia rates have been cited anywhere from 2% to 33%. As a result, some surgeons utilize mesh or other reinforcement upon donor-site closure, but its benefit in preventing abdominal wall morbidity has not been well-defined for DIEP flaps. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate DIEP donor-site closure techniques and the impact of mesh type and plane on abdominal-wall morbidity including hernia and bulge, relative to primary fascial closure. METHODS MEDLINE, PubMED, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were systematically reviewed for studies evaluating DIEP flap breast reconstruction abdominal-donor site closure, where any mesh reinforcement or primary fascial closure was specified, and postoperative outcomes of hernia and/or abdominal bulge were reported. Analysis was performed in Review Manager (RevMan) evaluating mesh use, type, and plane relative to primary fascial closure, using the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of significance level p < .05, and a random effects model to account for inter-study heterogeneity. RESULTS Of the 2791 DIEP patients across 11 studies, 1901 patients underwent primary closure and 890 were repaired with mesh. When hernia and/or bulge were combined into a single complication, the use of any mesh did not significantly reduce its odds compared to primary closure (OR = 0.69, p = .20). Similarly, the use of any mesh did not significantly reduce the odds of bulge alone compared to primary closure (OR = 0.62, p = .43). However, the odds of hernia alone were significantly reduced by 72% with any mesh use (OR = 0.28, p = .03). CONCLUSION Mesh use was significantly associated with decreased odds of hernia alone with DIEP flap surgery, but there was no difference in bulge or combined hernia/bulge rates. As bulge is the more common abdominal morbidity after DIEP flap harvest in a patient with no prior abdominal surgery or risk factor for hernia, mesh use is not indicated in abdominal closure of all DIEP patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to characterize the specific indications for mesh use in the setting of DIEP flap surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha Parmeshwar
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Melinda Lem
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Catherine L Dugan
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Merisa Piper
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bojanic C, Di Pace B, Ghorra DT, Fopp LJ, Rabey NG, Malata CM. A comparison of presentations and outcomes of salvage versus non-salvage abdominal free flap breast reconstructions-Results of a 15-year tertiary referral centre review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288364. [PMID: 37910518 PMCID: PMC10619878 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Salvage breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is becoming more prevalent due to a resurgence in implant-based procedures. The latter has caused a commensurate rise in failed or treatment-resistant prosthetic cases requiring conversion to free tissue transfers. Salvage reconstruction is often considered more challenging, owing to patient presentation, prior treatments and intraoperative difficulties. The aim of the study was to test this hypothesis by comparing outcomes of salvage versus non-salvage autologous microsurgical breast reconstructions in a retrospective matched cohort study. METHODS The demographics, risk factors, operative details and outcomes of patients who underwent free flap salvage of implant-based reconstructions by a single operator (2005-2019) were retrospectively evaluated. For each salvage reconstruction, the consecutive non-salvage abdominal free flap reconstruction was selected for comparison. The clinical outcomes including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, flap survival and complication rates were compared. RESULTS Of 442 microsurgical patients, 35 (8.0%) had salvage reconstruction comprising 41 flap transfers (29 unilateral, 6 bilateral) and 42 flaps (28 unilateral, 7 bilateral) in nonsalvage reconstruction. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps comprised the commonest autologous tissue used in both groups at 74% and 71% respectively. Most patients (83%) underwent salvage reconstruction for severe capsular contractures. There was a significant difference in radiation exposure between groups (salvage reconstruction 89%, non-salvage reconstruction 26%; p<0.00001). All 83 flaps were successful with similar reoperation rates and intraoperative blood losses. Unilateral salvage reconstruction took on average two hours longer than non-salvage reconstruction (p = 0.008). Overall complication rates were similar (p>0.05). CONCLUSION This 15-year study shows that despite salvage autologous free flap breast reconstruction requiring longer operation times, its intra and postoperative outcomes are generally comparable to non-salvage cases. Therefore, salvage breast reconstruction with free flaps provides a reliable option for failed or suboptimal implant-based reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Bojanic
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Di Pace
- Scuola Superiore Meridionale, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge and Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Dina T. Ghorra
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Laura J. Fopp
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas G. Rabey
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Charles M. Malata
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge and Chelmsford, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Atamian EK, Smith ML. Optimizing aesthetic results in autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2023; 12:1110-1121. [PMID: 37701300 PMCID: PMC10493624 DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
Advances in breast cancer management have provided most patients with the hope for cure or avoidance of cancer altogether. Such advances have made quality of life much more important after treatment and have led to equally incredible advances in breast reconstruction, to the point where reconstructive goals have altered the way mastectomies are now performed. As experience and expertise in microsurgery has grown, the surgical feat of successfully transferring tissue to restore breast volume is no longer considered an adequate endpoint for aesthetic breast reconstruction. A shift towards patient-centered care has motivated plastic surgeons to adapt their approaches to reconstruction integrating aesthetic principles to the process of recreating a breast mound in order to provide patients with a long-term, natural, and optimal result. Vital to restoring a shapely breast is a thorough preoperative assessment and the understanding of the breast footprint, breast conus, skin envelope and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) position. These aesthetic goals should also extend to the donor site, where adequate contour improvement is sought to offset the price of the donor site scar and the morbidity is minimized. By utilizing strategies for optimizing the NAC position, incorporating novel techniques to ensure core projection, and paying attention to the donor site, the skilled microsurgeon can elevate breast reconstruction to the level of true aesthetic surgery where the reconstructed appearance is superior to the presurgical one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa K Atamian
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Mark L Smith
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Amakiri UO, Doo FX, Kuruvilla A, Ibelli TJ, Jesús GHD, Kagen A, Henderson PW. Periumbilical Anatomy of Scarpa's Fascia: Rationale Behind a "Modified Scarpa's" Abdominal Closure Technique. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90:S252-S255. [PMID: 36752536 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative observation of Scarpa's fascia (SF) has suggested attenuation in the periumbilical region. This study's purpose was to objectively evaluate SF anatomy in the periumbilical region and assess clinical outcomes of a novel, modified SF closure technique of transverse abdominal wall incisions that only reapproximates SF where it is definitively present. METHODS Women were identified who had undergone abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography before their abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction that used the modified SF closure technique. Statistical analysis of SF presentation on the MR images was performed. Intraoperative measurements from dissected panniculectomy specimens were used to validate MR analysis. Donor site complications were recorded in patients undergoing modified SF closure. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were included in the retrospective MR imaging analysis; this revealed an average attenuation of SF of 4.7 cm (SEM = 0.25 cm), 4.5 cm (SEM = 0.23 cm), 4.6 cm (SEM = 0.23 cm), and 4.2 cm (SEM = 0.22 cm) to the left of, right of, cranial to, and caudal to the umbilicus, respectively. The mean surface area of radiologic SF absence was 56.3 cm 2 (SEM = 3.57 cm 2 ). There was a significant difference in SF presentation based on patient age ( P = 0.013) and body mass index ( P = 0.005). Five of the 66 patients (7.6%) experienced abdominal closure site complications. CONCLUSIONS This study objectively confirms that there is attenuation of SF in the periumbilical region, describes a novel SF closure technique, and provides evidence to support its adoption when closing transverse abdominal wall incisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uchechukwu O Amakiri
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Annet Kuruvilla
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Taylor J Ibelli
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gabrielle Hernaiz-De Jesús
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Alexander Kagen
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Peter W Henderson
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lu Wang M, Qin N, Chadab TM, Chen Y, Huang H, Ellison A, Otterburn DM. A Pilot Study Comparing Sensation in Buried Versus Nonburied Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2023:00000637-990000000-00220. [PMID: 36921324 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurotized deep inferior epigastic perforator (DIEP) flaps have been shown to improve sensory recovery after mastectomy and reconstruction. With the recent trend toward nipple-sparing mastectomies, sensation likely originates within the buried DIEP flap and then innervates the breast skin. In contrast, for patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomies, the DIEP flap skin is preserved, brought up to the surface, and directly innervated. In this study, we aim to evaluate inner breast region sensation between patients whose DIEP flap is buried and whose DIEP flap skin is brought to the surface. METHODS Seventy patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using the DIEP flap were prospectively identified. Of these, 60 patients underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with buried DIEP flap reconstruction while 10 patients underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with nonburied DIEP flap reconstruction. Patients in both cohorts received nerve grafting using the 70 × 1-2-mm Avance Nerve Graft in identical fashion. Sensitivity evaluation was performed in five inner breast regions (corresponding to the nonburied DIEP flap area). RESULTS In the buried DIEP cohort, at 6 months postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference in inner breast region sensitivity measurements compared with baseline levels (P < 0.001). In contrast, in the nonburied DIEP cohort, at 6 months postoperatively, sensation in the inner breast region was comparable with preoperative baseline levels (P = 0.236). At 24 months postoperatively, inner breast region sensitivity measurements in both cohorts were comparable with preoperative baseline measurements (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Neurotized DIEP flap skin raised directly to the surface confers earlier sensory recovery than buried DIEP flaps. In patients who undergo skin-sparing mastectomies with nonburied DIEP flap reconstruction, they can expect significantly better sensation in the inner regions of the breast at 6 months postoperatively. In patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomies with buried DIEP flap reconstruction, they can expect sensation in the inner breast to return to preoperative baseline levels at a later time point-beginning as early as 24 months postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Lu Wang
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine
| | - Nancy Qin
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine
| | | | - Yunchan Chen
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine
| | - Hao Huang
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Angela Ellison
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine
| | - David M Otterburn
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Munro SP, Dearden A, Joseph M, O'Donoghue JM. Reducing donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction with closed incisional negative pressure therapy: A cost-benefit analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 78:13-18. [PMID: 36739647 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction but create large abdominal incisions that risk donor-site morbidity during harvest. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) is emerging as an effective alternative to standard postoperative dressings, but there is a paucity of data in DIEP flap donor sites. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study investigating the use of ciNPT in DIEP flap donor sites at a single institution between March 2017 and September 2021. Patients who underwent microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps were included. Patients were divided into those with donor incision sites managed with ciNPT (n = 24) and those with conventional postoperative wound dressings (n = 20). We compared patient demographics, wound drainage volumes and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. A cost-benefit analysis was employed to compare the overall costs associated with each complication and differences in length of stay between the two groups. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity burden or smoking status between the two groups. Both groups had similar lengths of stay and wound drainage volumes with no readmissions or reoperations in either group. There was a statistically significant reduction in donor-site complications (p = 0.018), surgical site infections (p = 0.014) and seroma formation (p = 0.016) in those with ciNPT. Upon cost-benefit analysis, the ciNPT group had a mean reduction in cost-per-patient associated with postoperative complications of £420.77 (p = 0.031) and £446.47 (p = 0.049) when also accounting for postoperative length of stay CONCLUSION: ciNPT appears to be an effective alternative incision management system with the potential to improve complication rates and postoperative morbidity in DIEP flap donor sites. Our analysis demonstrates improved cost-benefit outweighing the increase in costs associated with ciNPT. We recommend a multicentre prospective trial with formal cost-utility analysis to strengthen these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S P Munro
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 4LP United Kingdom.
| | - A Dearden
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 4LP United Kingdom
| | - M Joseph
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 4LP United Kingdom
| | - J M O'Donoghue
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 4LP United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Reece MK, Langenfeld TL, Pak KY, Wax MK, Tan K, Slijepcevic A, Petrisor D, Alwani M, Johnson RM, Ducic Y, Kadakia SP. Impact of smoking on donor site following rectus flap harvest for head and neck reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103847. [PMID: 36989752 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The rectus abdominis myocutaneous free flap has been widely used as a reconstructive option in head and neck reconstruction with great success. Challenging the popular assumption, this study sought to examine the effects of smoking on donor site complications in this population. METHODS Multi-institution retrospective study of 103 patients (50 active smokers, 28 former and 25 never smoked). RESULTS Overall complication rate was 14.5 %. Hernia rate 4.8 %, evisceration 0 %, dehiscence 2.9 %, infection 6.7 %. Smoking history did not significantlly influence complication rates (chi square test, p = 0.33). Abdominal wall closure technique also did not influence the complication rate (chi square test, p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS The rectus abdomonis myocutaneous free flap has an acceptable complication rate that does not appear to be influenced by smoking history. While patients should be counseled regarding smoking cessation, smoking habits should not delay treatment nor obviate consideration of rectus flap utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mac Kenzie Reece
- Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Dayton, OH, United States of America.
| | - Tyler L Langenfeld
- Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States of America.
| | - Kaitlynne Y Pak
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Mark K Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
| | - Kenneth Tan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
| | - Allison Slijepcevic
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, United States of America.
| | - Dan Petrisor
- Department of Oral Maxillo Facial Surgery, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
| | - Mohamedkazim Alwani
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - R Michael Johnson
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Yadranko Ducic
- Otolarygology and Facial Plastic Surgery Assoc., Forth Worth, TX, United States of America
| | - Sameep P Kadakia
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 30 E Apple St, Suite 2200, 45409, Dayton, OH, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Prophylactic Antibiotics for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison between Three Different Duration Approaches. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e4833. [PMID: 36845865 PMCID: PMC9946379 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
There is no consensus on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic use for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy. We attempted to standardize the use of prophylactic antibiotics after mastectomy using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for the breast reconstruction procedure. Methods This retrospective case series included 108 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap at the Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital between 2012 and 2019. Patients were divided into three groups based on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration (1, 3, and >7 days) for patients with drains. Data were analyzed between January and April 2021. Results The prevalence of surgical site infection in the breast was 0.93% (1/108), and in the abdomen it was 0%. The patient groups did not differ by age, body mass index, smoking status, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Only one patient experienced surgical site infection in the breast after half-deep necrosis of the inferior epigastric perforator flap. There were no significant differences in surgical site infection based on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic use. The operation time, methods of breast surgery, volume of fluid drainage in the first 3 days of the abdominal and breast drains, and day of removal of the abdominal and breast drains did not affect surgical site infection. Conclusion Based on these data, we do not recommend extending prophylactic antibiotics beyond 24 hours in deep inferior epigastric perforator reconstruction.
Collapse
|
21
|
Linder S, Fansa H. The Scarless Neo-Umbilicus in DIEP-Flap Breast Reconstruction. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020315. [PMID: 36836549 PMCID: PMC9967403 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
While the DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) flap has become the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction due to its favourable tissue characteristics and preserved abdominal wall function, a constant attempt is done to improve the outcome of the donor site. Even if just a small detail, the umbilicus has a big impact on the overall aesthetic outcome of the donor site. As an already established technique in abdominoplasties, we introduced the neo-umbilicus as the standard procedure for DIEP donor site closure. The aim of this study was to assess the aesthetic outcome of this neo-umbilicoplasty technique in DIEP-flaps. This is a single-center cohort study. A total of 30 consecutive breast cancer patients were treated during a period of 9 months with a mastectomy and an immediate reconstruction with a DIEP-flap. In all patients, the reconstruction of the umbilicus was done by an immediate neo-umbilicoplasty technique, consisting of a cylindrical fat resection at the new loco typico and fixation of the dermis directly to the rectus fascia. All patients were photographed in a standardised setting. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed with a survey consisting of three questions and aesthetic outcome was evaluated by an independent professional panel consisting of three plastic surgeons. The results were compared to a previous cohort of conventional umbilicoplasties in DIEP-flap patients. Twenty-six patients participated in the follow-up study. There were no wound complications associated with the neo-umbilicus. Questionnaire results demonstrated high but not statistically significant different patient satisfaction. The panel scores were statistically significant (p < 0.05) better for the neo-umbilicus reconstructions. The aesthetic outcome was rated higher in patients with a higher BMI compared to those in patients with a low BMI. The creation of a neo-umbilicus at the donor site after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction is a quick and safe technique and leads to a superior aesthetic donor site result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sora Linder
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Breast Center Zürich, Spital Zollikerberg, Zollikerberg, 8125 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Hisham Fansa
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Breast Center Zürich, Spital Zollikerberg, Zollikerberg, 8125 Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Klinikum Bielefeld, OWL-University, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Long-Term Results after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP versus PAP Flaps Based on Quality of Life and Aesthetic Outcome Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12030737. [PMID: 36769386 PMCID: PMC9917944 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This work aimed to conduct a comparative study, providing long-term data about patient-reported outcome measures and donor site scar assessments, as well as an aesthetic evaluation of the reconstructed breasts in patients with DIEP versus PAP flap breast reconstruction. (2) Methods: This prospective, single-center, matched cohort study included a total of 36 patients after DIEP and PAP flap breast reconstruction. The evaluation was carried out using the Breast-Q and POSAS questionnaire, as well as the Breast Aesthetic Scale for cosmetic analysis, by four plastic surgeons. (3) Results: The postoperative Breast-Q evaluation revealed no significant differences between both patient groups for the categories of the physical well-being of the donor site, the physical well-being of the breast, and satisfaction with the breast. A scar evaluation of the donor site region showed equivalent results for the thigh and abdomen regions, concerning the overall opinion of the patients and the observers. There was no significant difference between both methods of reconstruction for all aspects of breast aesthetics. (4) Conclusions: Similar results for donor site morbidity, scar quality, and the aesthetic outcome of the breasts in both the DIEP and PAP patient groups have been demonstrated. Hence, in those cases suitable for both types of reconstruction, the decision can be based on factors such as patients' lifestyles, leisure activities, and preferences.
Collapse
|
23
|
Grünherz L, Gousopoulos E, Barbon C, Uyulmaz S, Giovanoli P, Lindenblatt N. [Robotics in plastic surgery]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 94:325-329. [PMID: 36625922 PMCID: PMC10042931 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01790-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In recent years surgical robotic systems which were specifically developed for microsurgery have expanded the application of robotic-assisted surgery to plastic reconstructive surgery. Currently, there are two microsurgical robotic systems available for reconstructive plastic surgery. Both systems feature tremor reduction and motion scaling technologies, which are intended to optimize the surgeon's precision and dexterity. In the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery at the University Hospital Zurich, the Symani Surgical System® has already been used for many microsurgical and supermicrosurgical operations, including autologous breast reconstruction, nerve transfer and, in particular, reconstructive lymphatic surgery. Despite special technical challenges, such as a lack of haptic feedback, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages for an appropriately trained and skilled microsurgeon, including smaller surgical access incisions for anatomically deep structures and an improvement in surgical precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne Grünherz
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Epameinondas Gousopoulos
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Carlotta Barbon
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Semra Uyulmaz
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Pietro Giovanoli
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Nicole Lindenblatt
- Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Löfstrand J, Paganini A, Lidén M, Hansson E. Donor-Site Satisfaction of DIEP and Latissimus Dorsi Flaps-A Comparative Cohort Study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022. [PMID: 36379466 DOI: 10.1055/a-1978-9610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding of donor-site morbidity and satisfaction after breast reconstruction is limited. There are few previous studies comparing satisfaction with different donor sites in breast reconstruction. This study aimed to examine the long-term patient-reported satisfaction with the donor site of latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in comparison to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. Further, a systematic review of previously published studies was conducted. METHODS In this retrospective cross-sectional study, all women who underwent breast reconstructions with either LD or DIEP flap following mastectomy and radiotherapy between 2007 and 2017 were included; patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module. For the systematic review, studies examining patient-reported abdominal satisfaction and well-being, and meeting the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) criteria were included. RESULTS Eligible and responding participants were divided into the LD (n = 135 patients) and DIEP (n = 118 patients) flap groups. Impairment due to muscular weakness of the donor site was more common in the LD group than that of the DIEP group. Bulging was common in the DIEP group and increased over time. Regarding the esthetic appearance of the donor site, the patients in the DIEP group were less satisfied than the LD group. The systematic review showed that most of the patients were dissatisfied with their abdomen after the operation. CONCLUSION Patients who have undergone DIEP flap for breast reconstruction are less satisfied with the donor-site esthetics than those who have undergone LD flap. Patient-reported abdominal bulging was common in the DIEP group and the number seemed to increase over time. Most patients were not satisfied with their abdominal scarring postoperatively, as per the systematic review. These results may indicate a need for more nuanced preoperative patient information, as well as improvements in the surgical management of the donor site, for DIEP flap reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Löfstrand
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Paganini
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mattias Lidén
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Emma Hansson
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kang S, Okumura S, Maruyama Y, Hyodo I, Nakamura R, Kobayashi S, Kato M, Takanari K. Effect of Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Donor Site Morbidity in Breast Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap. JPRAS Open 2022; 34:73-81. [PMID: 36204305 PMCID: PMC9529661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The usefulness of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been well documented in many surgical sites, except for the donor site of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ciNPWT on microsurgical breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap. Methods Fifty-six cases of breast reconstruction with DIEP flap were included and divided into two groups based on post-surgical wound management: the ciNPWT group received ciNPWT at the donor site, while the conventional group received conventional wound management. The primary outcomes were the incidence of seroma, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection, and secondary outcomes were the time to drain removal and amount of drainage. The breast reconstruction risk assessment (BRA) score was used to evaluate the comprehensive risk in each case. Results Among the patient and surgical characteristics, only the BRA score (P=0.02) and the time to elevate the flap (P=0.02) were significantly higher and longer in the ciNPWT group, respectively. The incidence of seroma, dehiscence, and wound infection showed no significant difference between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients with body mass index ≥ 25, the primary outcomes did not differ, while the secondary outcomes were significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (drainage volume, P = 0.04; time to drain removal, P = 0.04) Conclusion ciNPWT can potentially reduce the incidence of donor site complications of DIEP flaps, especially if the comprehensive risk for post-surgical complications is considered.
Collapse
|
26
|
Louis F, Sowa Y, Irie S, Higuchi Y, Kitano S, Mazda O, Matsusaki M. Injectable Prevascularized Mature Adipose Tissues (iPAT) to Achieve Long-Term Survival in Soft Tissue Regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2022; 11:e2201440. [PMID: 36103662 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202201440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Soft tissue regeneration remains a challenge in reconstructive surgery. So far, both autologous fat implantations and artificial implants methods used in clinical applications lead to various disadvantages and limited lifespan. To overcome these limitations and improve the graft volume maintenance, reproducing a mature adipose tissue already including vasculature structure before implantation can be the solution. Therefore, injectable prevascularized adipose tissues (iPAT) are made from physiological collagen microfibers mixed with human mature adipocytes, adipose-derived stem cells, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells, embedded in fibrin gel. Following murine subcutaneous implantation, the iPAT show a higher cell survival (84% ± 6% viability) and volume maintenance after 3 months (up to twice heavier) when compared to non-prevascularized balls and liposuctioned fat implanted controls. This higher survival can be explained by the greater amount of blood vessels found (up to 1.6-fold increase), with balanced host anastomosis (51% ± 1% of human/mouse lumens), also involving infiltration by the lymphatic and neural vasculature networks. Furthermore, with the cryopreservation possibility enabling their later reinjection, the iPAT technology has the merit to allow noninvasive soft tissue regeneration for long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Louis
- Joint Research Laboratory (TOPPAN) for Advanced Cell Regulatory Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sowa
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Shinji Irie
- Joint Research Laboratory (TOPPAN) for Advanced Cell Regulatory Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.,TOPPAN INC, Taito, Tokyo, 110-0016, Japan
| | - Yuriko Higuchi
- Department of Drug Delivery Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Shiro Kitano
- Joint Research Laboratory (TOPPAN) for Advanced Cell Regulatory Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.,TOPPAN INC, Taito, Tokyo, 110-0016, Japan
| | - Osam Mazda
- Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Michiya Matsusaki
- Joint Research Laboratory (TOPPAN) for Advanced Cell Regulatory Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.,Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alves AS, Tan V, Scampa M, Kalbermatten DF, Oranges CM. Complications of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174272. [PMID: 36077807 PMCID: PMC9454956 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) has become the most frequent autologous flap in breast reconstruction, it remains unclear whether reconstruction should be performed at the same time as the mastectomy or delayed. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to offer an overview of recipient site postoperative complications and help guide practicians toward the ideal timing for breast reconstruction. A pooled analysis using the Mantel and Haenszel methods with a fixed effect model provided results as an odd ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Among most complications including hematoma, infection, fat necrosis, and flap loss, no significant differences were observed. However, delayed wound healing was significantly higher for patients who underwent delayed breast reconstruction. This paper offers evidence that both surgical timings offer similar outcomes and are, therefore, valid surgical strategies. Abstract Purpose: The setting regarding the ideal timing for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) reconstruction remains unclear. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is performed at the same time as mastectomy, while delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) is performed at any time after mastectomy except immediately. We compared both strategies to assess whether IBR or DBR should be performed to reduce postoperative adverse events. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science was conducted, aiming at articles comparing the recipient site outcomes of IBR versus DBR with DIEP. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method with a fixed effects model. Results were expressed as the OR with a 95% CI. Results: Two retrospective and two prospective studies were identified involving 5784 DIEPs (1744 immediate and 4040 delayed). We showed a significant difference in favor of IBR for wound healing issues (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.77; p = 0.0003). However, no significant differences for hematoma, infection, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, and total flap loss rate were seen. Conclusions: Despite variability in the choice of the ideal time for breast reconstruction and outcomes reported among studies, immediate DIEP surgery appears to be a reliable setting with less delayed healing issues.
Collapse
|
28
|
Augustin A, Pülzl P, Morandi EM, Winkelmann S, Schoberleitner I, Brunner C, Ritter M, Bauer T, Wachter T, Wolfram D. Donor-Site Morbidity and Quality of Life after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP versus TMG Flap. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5682-5697. [PMID: 36005186 PMCID: PMC9406532 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) and the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap are both safe choices for autologous breast reconstruction originating from the same donor region in the upper thigh. We aimed to compare the post-operative outcome regarding donor-site morbidity and quality of life. We included 18 patients who had undergone autologous breast reconstruction with a PAP flap (n = 27 flaps). Prospective evaluation of donor-site morbidity was performed by applying the same questionnaire that had already been established in a previous study evaluating TMG flap (n = 25 flaps) outcome, and results were compared. Comparison of the two patient groups showed equivalent results concerning patient-reported visibility of the donor-site scar and thigh symmetry. Still, the TMG group was significantly more satisfied with the scar (p = 0.015) and its position (p = 0.001). No difference was found regarding the ability to sit for prolonged periods. Donor-site wound complications were seen more frequently in the PAP group (29.6%) than in the TMG group (4.0%). Both groups expressed rather high satisfaction with their quality of life. Both flaps show minimal functional donor-site morbidity and high patient satisfaction. To minimize wound healing problems in PAP patients, thorough planning of the skin paddle is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Augustin
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Petra Pülzl
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Evi M. Morandi
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Selina Winkelmann
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ines Schoberleitner
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christine Brunner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Magdalena Ritter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas Bauer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tanja Wachter
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dolores Wolfram
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-(0)-512-504-22731
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bigdeli AK, Momeni A, Kneser U. [Increasing Safety in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction - Technique and Technology]. HANDCHIR MIKROCHIR P 2022; 54:314-325. [PMID: 35785806 DOI: 10.1055/a-1858-5214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Microsurgical reconstruction has established itself as a standard procedure in breast reconstruction as it permits creation of a natural and aesthetically appealing breast mound, even after modified radical mastectomy and radiation. In the past few decades numerous new free flap donor-sites have been described that permit an individualized approach to reconstruction, thus, resulting in a high level of patient satisfaction. Paralleling these technical innovations, the focus of microsurgical breast reconstruction has shifted from mere "flap success" to "aesthetic outcome", while also taking into account the respective donor-site morbidity. Here, the authors discuss contemporary developments in the field with a particular focus on surgical techniques and technologies that contribute to increasing the safety of microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Khosrow Bigdeli
- Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie - Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.,Klinik für Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arash Momeni
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie - Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.,Klinik für Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Merchant A, Speck NE, Michalak M, Schaefer DJ, Farhadi J. Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49:494-500. [PMID: 35919555 PMCID: PMC9340184 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisha Merchant
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicole E Speck
- Plastic Surgery Group, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michal Michalak
- Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Dirk J Schaefer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jian Farhadi
- Plastic Surgery Group, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jakeman M, Barnes J, Taghizadeh R. Prevention and Management of Post-Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Abdominal Bulge: a Five-year Single Surgeon Series. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:3683-3689. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
32
|
Zoccali G, Blackburn A, Francesca R, Alexandra M, Farhadi J. Safe mobilisation of transverse upper gracilis flap in patients with hip replacements. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:2970-2973. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
33
|
Siegwart LC, Tapking C, Diehm YF, Haug VF, Bigdeli AK, Kneser U, Kotsougiani-Fischer D. The Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on the Medial Thigh Donor Site in Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction. J Clin Med 2022; 11:2887. [PMID: 35629014 PMCID: PMC9148051 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) on donor site complications and patient perceptions in transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap breast reconstruction. Our institution conducted a retrospective cohort study, including all patients with TMG flap breast reconstruction from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021. Patients were grouped according to conventional wound management or CINPT. Outcomes were surgical site complications, fluid drainage, time to drain removal, and in-hospital stay length. A patient survey was created. A total of 56 patients with 83 TMG flaps were included (control group: 35 patients with 53 TMG flaps; CINPT group: 21 patients with 30 TMG flaps). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The flap width was significantly larger in the CINPT group (8.0 cm vs. 7.0 cm, p = 0.013). Surgical site complications were reduced in the CINPT group without statistical difference (30.0% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.064). Fluid drainage and time to drain removal were similar in both groups. The average in-hospital stay was significantly shortened in the CINPT group (10.0 days vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.030). The survey excluded pain, skin irritations, and discomfort during sleep and movement in the CINPT group and showed that the patients felt well protected. This study fails to provide compelling evidence for CINPT to enhance incision healing on the donor site in TMG flap breast reconstruction. There was a trend toward reduced surgical site complications on the donor thigh and the in-hospital stay was shortened. Prophylactic CINPT increases patient comfort and provides a feeling of additional wound protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany; (L.C.S.); (C.T.); (Y.F.D.); (V.F.H.); (A.K.B.); (U.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wederfoort JLM, van Santbrink E, Hommes JE, Heuts EM, Van Kuijk SMJ, van der Hulst RRWJ, Piatkowski A. Donor Site Satisfaction Following Autologous Fat Transfer for Total Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 43:40-48. [PMID: 35580058 PMCID: PMC9830977 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With evolving breast cancer survival and patient preferences, it is essential that reconstructive surgeons worldwide continue searching for the best reconstruction technique for patients. Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is a relatively new technique for total breast reconstruction that has already proven to be effective and safe with all advantages of autologous tissue. However, little is known about the aesthetic results and satisfaction concerning donor sites. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to measure donor site satisfaction following AFT for total breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients. METHODS Between May and August of 2021, participants of the BREAST- trial who were at least 24 months after their final reconstruction surgery were invited to complete an additional survey concerning donor sites. The BODY-Q was utilized for data collection. Results of AFT patients were compared with a control group of implant-based reconstruction patients who did not have a donor site. RESULTS A total of 51 patients (20 control, 31 intervention) completed the questionnaire. Satisfaction with body did not statistically differ between the groups. The most frequent complaint was contour irregularities (31 reports, 60.8%), with the least favorable donor site being thighs (23 reports, 53.5%) in the AFT group. CONCLUSIONS Satisfaction with body did not differ between breast cancer patients receiving AFT or implant-based reconstruction, meaning that large-volume liposuction does not aesthetically affect the utilized donor sites. Nevertheless, reconstructive surgeons should be aware of possible donor site complications, especially contour irregularities at the thighs, and discuss this with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamilla L M Wederfoort
- Corresponding Author: Dr Jamilla Lonieke Maria Wederfoort, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands. E-mail: ; Instagram: @jamzz21
| | - Esther van Santbrink
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Juliette E Hommes
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther M Heuts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sander M J Van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - René R W J van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Andrzej Piatkowski
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Robotic Harvest of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Case Series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149:1073-1077. [PMID: 35255056 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is emerging as a viable tool in reconstructive surgery. Harvesting of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is typically performed through an anterior approach, which involves a long fascial incision. A robotic approach allows the deep inferior epigastric pedicle to be harvested from the posterior surface. This approach reduces the length of the fascial incision and should decrease the abdominal morbidity associated with large fascial dissections. METHODS A case series study of 21 patients who underwent a robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator or during a 12-month period for breast reconstruction was performed. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and complications were assessed. RESULTS Mean patient age was 54.6 ± 7.6 years, and mean body mass index was 30.4 ± 3.9 kg/m2. Mean fascial incision and pedicle length were 3.6 ± 1.6 cm and 13.3 ± 1 cm, respectively. None of the patients required conversion to open harvest. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 0.9 days. Surgical site occurrences were identified in five patients (31.3 percent). One patient had delayed wound healing at the donor site. None of the patients developed hernia or bulge. The mean benefit (B = C - A), defined as length of fascial incision spared and measured as the difference between pedicle length and intramuscular course, was 9.83 ± 2.28 cm. The precision of computed tomography angiography in identifying the intraoperative fascial incision was 86 percent. CONCLUSION The robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is a safe and reliable technique that decreases the length of fascial incision and short-term complications associated with the open approach. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
Collapse
|
36
|
A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030683. [PMID: 35328236 PMCID: PMC8947670 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The abdominal microsurgical flap based on the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the most popular option worldwide for autologous breast reconstruction. Several authors have investigated the results of reconstructed breasts, but the literature lacks systematic reviews exploring the donor site of the abdominal wall. To fulfil our aims, a new diagnostic muscle imaging analysis was designed and implemented. This study focused on rectus abdominal muscle morphology and function in a single series of 12 consecutive patients analysed before and after breast reconstruction with a microsurgical DIEP flap. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, “ipsilateral reconstruction” and “contralateral reconstruction”, depending on the side of the flap harvest and breast reconstruction, then evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scans scheduled for tumor staging, and clinically examined by a physiatrist. Numerous alterations in muscle physiology were observed due to surgical dissection of perforator vessels, and rectus muscle distress without functional impairment was a common result. Postoperatively, patients undergoing “contralateral reconstruction” appeared to exhibit fewer rectus muscle alterations. Overall, only three patients were impacted by a long-term deterioration in their quality of life. On the basis of the newly developed and implemented diagnostic approach, we concluded that DIEP microsurgical breast reconstruction is a safe procedure without major complications at the donor site, even if long-term alterations of the rectus muscle are a common finding.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wederfoort J, Hebels S, Heuts E, van der Hulst R, de Grzymala AP. Donor site complications and satisfaction in autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:1316-1327. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
38
|
Yang JH, Colakoglu S, Mureau MA, Siddikoglu D, Johnson AC, Cohen JB, Lee BT, Chong TW, Mathes DW, Kaoutzanis C. Midline Epigastric Scars Can Be Associated with Higher Umbilical Complications Following DIEP Flap Harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:1826-1832. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
39
|
Jacobs JED, Beudeker N, Bargon CA, Siesling S, Hendriks-Brouwer N, Zöphel OT, Schmidbauer U, Smulders YCMM, Wijbenga JG, Rakhorst HA. Lean DIEP flap surgery: saving time and reducing complications. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-021-01836-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
40
|
Donor Site Morbidity in Unilateral and Bilateral Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis (TMG) Flap Breast Reconstruction: Sensation, Function, Aesthesis and Patient-Reported Outcomes. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215066. [PMID: 34768585 PMCID: PMC8584688 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has become a popular choice for breast reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the donor site morbidity in unilateral and bilateral procedures. Patients receiving a TMG flap (January 2008–October 2019) were invited to a follow-up and grouped according to unilateral (UL group) or bilateral (BL group) breast reconstruction. Outcome criteria included sensation, function and aesthesis of the thighs. Patient-reported outcomes were surveyed using validated questionnaires. The number and kind of refinement procedures for aesthetic purposes on the donor thighs were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients with 59 TMG flaps were included in the study (UL group: n = 17, BL group: n = 21). Normal to slightly diminished superficial skin sensation was maintained in most of the thigh skin (98.4%). Strength and mobility were without impairment in >80% of the thighs in both groups. Thigh symmetry was achieved in both groups. Symmetrisation procedures were significantly more often performed in the UL group (p = 0.005). The total number of refinement procedures was similar in both groups. Patient-reported outcomes were similar with good appearance of the thighs and scars, excellent function and low pain levels. The TMG flap offers excellent function and sensation on the donor thigh. Thigh symmetry and good patient satisfaction may be achieved in both unilateral and bilateral breast reconstructions.
Collapse
|
41
|
Prevention and Management of Complications of Tissue Flaps. Surg Clin North Am 2021; 101:813-829. [PMID: 34537145 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we discuss 4 common free flaps performed in reconstructive surgery: the anterolateral thigh flap, the radial forearm flap, the fibula flap, and the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous/deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Donor and recipient complications for each flap type and strategies on how to prevent and manage such complications are discussed.
Collapse
|
42
|
Zoccali G, Farhadi J. Abdominal perforator exchange flap (APEX): A classification of pedicle rearrangements. Microsurgery 2021; 41:607-614. [PMID: 34387913 DOI: 10.1002/micr.30796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abdominal-based reconstruction is the most commonly performed method for breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the patient's own tissues. DIEP flap has allowed to reduce the donor site morbidity but the incidence of bulging or hernia remains still high, especially when flap is based on multiple perforators. Abdominal Perforator Exchange flap (APEX) represents a further step forward in preserving the abdominal wall structures by disassembling the pedicle components and their reconstitution at the end of the dissection. In this study, we explore the possible anatomical configurations of perforators exchange for APEX, providing a simple classification of perforators reconstitution patterns and the possible clinical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on patients who received APEX flap for abdominal based breast reconstruction. Preoperative CT scans and procedure descriptions were analyzed to identify the vascular patterns during flap harvesting and the pedicle reconstitution sites. The onset of abdominal wall and flap related complications were investigated. RESULTS APEX flap was performed on 51 women and four vascular patterns were identified. We identified the Type A pattern in 36 cases (70.6%), the Type B pattern in 8 (15.7%), and the Type C pattern in 5 (9.8%). We performed an extra-anatomical reanastomosis (Type D) in only two case (3.9%) (p = .09). We recorded anastomotic problems in five pedicles' reconstitution and the odds ratio showed a possible correlation between the localization of pedicle division and the anastomosis problems (p > .05). No total or partial flap loss was recorded during this study. Marginal fat necrosis was clinically observed in three cases, which had very large flaps. No bulging or hernia was recorded. CONCLUSION Our perforators exchange classification for abdominal-based flap helps clinician in planning the surgery and also in describing the procedure easily allowing a more efficient communication. This classification could be used to approach perforator flaps with multiple vessels at other anatomical locations as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Zoccali
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, UK
| | - Jian Farhadi
- Plastic Surgery Group, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Faculty of Medicine, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Miseré RM, van Kuijk SM, Claassens EL, Heuts EM, Piatkowski AA, van der Hulst RR. Breast-related and body-related quality of life following autologous breast reconstruction is superior to implant-based breast reconstruction - A long-term follow-up study. Breast 2021; 59:176-182. [PMID: 34271290 PMCID: PMC8287213 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The better survival rates after breast cancer allow for setting of long-term goals, such as Quality of Life (QoL) and aesthetic outcomes following breast reconstruction. Studies find a higher breast-related QoL and greater satisfaction with breasts following autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) compared to implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). However, aesthetic results from donor sites can influence body image. This concern is little addressed in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the long-term breast-related and body-related QoL of women who underwent ABR to women who underwent IBR. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted between November and December 2020 among women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2018. A general questionnaire, the BREAST-Q, and the BODY-Q were used to collect data. Multivariable linear regression was performed to adjust differences in Q-scores for potential confounders. RESULTS In total, 336 patients were included (112 IBR, 224 ABR). Autologous reconstruction resulted in significantly higher mean scores in all subdomains of the BREAST-Q. On the BODY-Q, IBR scored significantly higher on scars, while ABR scored moderately to significantly higher on all other scales. Despite a lower mean score on Hips & outer thighs in women with Lateral Thigh Perforator (LTP) flap reconstruction, no negative influence on body image was found in these women. CONCLUSIONS Long-term breast-related and body-related outcomes of ABR are superior to IBR. Donor site aesthetic does not adversely affect body image in women who underwent free flap breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Ml Miseré
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Sander Mj van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Eva L Claassens
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Esther M Heuts
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Andrzej A Piatkowski
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - René Rwj van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: focus on donor site morbidity. Breast Cancer 2021; 28:1273-1282. [PMID: 34091861 PMCID: PMC8514370 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01264-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap is as a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the donor site morbidity and secondary refinement procedures after TMG flap breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective study was conducted, including all patients who received TMG flap breast reconstructions, from January 2012 to August 2019. Primary outcomes were surgical site complications of the donor site and secondary refinement procedures carried out for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes for the medial thigh. Secondary outcomes of interest were lipofilling procedures for optimization of the reconstructed breasts. Results Ninety-nine patients received 159 TMG flaps for breast reconstruction. Patients’ mean BMI was 23.5 (15.6–32.5) kg/m2. Bilateral breast reconstructions were performed in 60.6%. The mean flap volume was 330 (231–440) g. Surgical site complications occurred in 14.5% of the TMG donor sites and wound dehiscence was the most common complication (9.4%). Lymphedema occurred in 1.8% of the donor thighs. Aesthetic refinement procedures were performed in 25.2% on the donor thigh or contralateral thigh. Secondary lipofilling was performed in 54.1% of the reconstructed breasts and fat was harvested in only 11.9% from the legs. Conclusion The TMG flap breast reconstruction combines low donor site morbidity with adequate volume for appealing breast results, particularly in slim-to-normal weight patients. However, patients should be informed about the likelihood of secondary refinement procedures on the donor site and the need of lipofilling to optimize the breast shape and volume.
Collapse
|
45
|
Siegwart LC, Bolbos A, Tapking C, Seide SE, Diehm Y, Fischer S, Kneser U, Kotsougiani-Fischer D. Safety and donor site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap in autologous breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:492-509. [PMID: 34091906 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has gained popularity for breast reconstruction. However, the literature regarding its donor site morbidity is heterogeneous. This systematic review sought to clarify the evidence on donor site morbidity. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted. We included all articles reporting on donor-site morbidity of the TMG flap for breast reconstruction. The results were analyzed in R and its extension meta. A generalized linear mixed model was used to combine proportions and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Nineteen articles provided an overall sample of 843 TMG flaps. The total flap loss was low at 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). All patients were normal weight (pooled body mass index 22.75, 95% CI, 21.88-23.63). The incidence of wound dehiscence (8%, 95% CI, 4%-16%), seroma (4%, 95% CI, 2%-7%), hematoma (2%, 95% CI, 1%-4%) and infection (0%-5%) on the TMG donor site was low. Functional impairments included sensory disturbance (0%-74%), motoric deficits (0%-50%), and changes in the genital region (0%-24%), all of which were modest. CONCLUSIONS This review confirms the safety and low donor site morbidity of the TMG flap in normal-weight patients, which is comparable to that of other popular free flaps in breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cosima Siegwart
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Anca Bolbos
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Christian Tapking
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Svenja E Seide
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yannick Diehm
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Taghizadeh R. Invited Discussion on: "The Use of Semi-absorbable Mesh and Its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:917-920. [PMID: 33606063 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02155-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rieka Taghizadeh
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Warrington Road, Merseyside, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Speck NE, Lardi AM, Farhadi J. Donor site grading after six autologous breast reconstructions for one single patient. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-020-01720-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
48
|
Patel AA, Arquette CP, Rowley MA, Borrelli MR, Lee GK, Nazerali RS. Comparing Outcomes of Flap-Based Salvage Reconstructions in the Radiated Breast. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:S403-S408. [PMID: 33976069 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chest wall irradiation significantly decreases the strength and quality of breast tissue supporting prostheses, increasing the risk of skin breakdown and implant or tissue expander extrusion. Autologous tissue, including the latissimus dorsi (LD) or abdominal-based flaps, including the muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, may be used to salvage reconstructions. However, data comparing outcomes of the two flap options remains limited. We compare postoperative outcomes from both flap types after autologous salvage reconstruction in irradiated breasts. METHODS Charts were retrospectively reviewed from patients who underwent either chest wall radiation or postmastectomy radiation therapy followed by salvage autologous reconstruction with either a LD and an implant or an abdominal-based flap (muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps). Patients with a history of tissue expander or implant failure requiring autologous salvage as part of 2-staged or delayed-immediate breast reconstruction that were operated on between January 2005 and November 2015 were included. Basic demographics, comorbidities, and recipient site complications (infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, and flap failure) were collected. RESULTS A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria which included 72 flaps; 35 LD and 37 abdominally based flaps. Demographics and comorbidities did not vary significantly between patient groups. Mean follow-up was 767.6 weeks, and all reconstructions were unilateral. Nineteen (26.4%) patients had at least one complication, most commonly minor infections (9.7%). Overall complication rates were not significantly different between flap groups (P = 0.083). Wound dehiscence was significantly higher in the abdominal group (P = 0.045), and fat necrosis also trended higher in this group (P = 0.085). Major infection trended higher in the latissimus group (P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS When comparing outcomes of salvage flap-based reconstruction in radiated breast tissue, overall complication rates were similar when comparing postoperative outcomes between the LD- and abdominal-based flaps. Wound dehiscence was significantly higher when salvage reconstruction used an abdominal flap. Understanding the complications after salvage procedures can help inform decision making and optimize patient care to improve outcomes after breast reconstruction in the radiated breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Connor P Arquette
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Mallory A Rowley
- From the College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - Mimi R Borrelli
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Gordon K Lee
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Rahim S Nazerali
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Yano T, Yoshimatsu H, Karakawa R, Fuse Y, Kuramoto Y, Shibata T, Suesada N, Miyashita H. Use of a combined SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2021; 41:319-326. [PMID: 33682221 DOI: 10.1002/micr.30727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard for breast reconstruction, but it has some drawbacks such as abdominal bulging and hernia. To overcome these disadvantages, the superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator (SIEA) flap is used as an alternative option, but it has another problem, namely limited vascular territory and risk of vascular thrombosis. To solve these problems, we introduced our new technique, a combined SIEA and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) based double pedicled abdominal flap. In this report, we present our experience of using this technique. METHODS The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap was used in five patients who wanted to have unilateral breast reconstruction after a mastectomy due to breast cancer. The average age was 48.2 (range 38-56) years, and the average BMI was 24.4 (range 19.2-31.4). The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap was designed as a modified DIEP flap, and all flaps were placed in the vertical setting. The flap pedicles had two different vascular supplies, SIEA and SCIA, and the drainage systems, SIEV and SCIV, anastomosed to the internal mammary artery and vein in all cases. RESULTS The harvested SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flaps were a median volume of 925 g (range 452-1570 g) and average size of 491 cm2 (range 440-611 cm2 ). The average reconstructive time was 7:41 (range 6:31-9:17). In four out of the five cases, the SIEA and SCIA joined together to make a common pedicle artery trunk, and its average size was 1.08 mm. Four out of the five cases had a wide vascular territory crossing the abdominal midline as shown by ICG angiography. One case showed ICG fluorescence for the hemi-side of the abdominal flap. Postoperative course was uneventful, and there were no major perioperative complications, which need extra surgical procedures. Follow-up period averaged 273 days (range 194-312 days). CONCLUSION The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap showed viable flap territory across the midline in all cases. The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap might be another ideal option for breast reconstruction, when appropriate SIEA and SCIA pedicles are identified, and an adequate ICG fluorescence is obtained for the size of flap needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Yano
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidehiko Yoshimatsu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Karakawa
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuma Fuse
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukiko Kuramoto
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyoshi Shibata
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuko Suesada
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Miyashita
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Siegwart LC, Sieber L, Fischer S, Maraka S, Kneser U, Kotsougiani-Fischer D. Influence of closed incision negative-pressure therapy on abdominal donor-site morbidity in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2020; 42:32-39. [PMID: 33201541 DOI: 10.1002/micr.30683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Closed incision negative-pressure therapy (CINPT) has been shown to shorten the time to heal in post-bariatric abdominoplasty and to lower seroma rates in cosmetic abdominoplasty. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of CINPT on donor-site morbidity following abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed medical records from 225 women who had undergone 300 microsurgical free-flap breast reconstructions from the abdomen from November 1, 2007 to March 31, 2019. Patients were grouped according to wound therapy, including 127 patients in the standard of care group and 98 patients in the CINPT group. Primary outcomes were minor (non-operative) and major (operative) surgical site complications. Secondary outcomes were time to drain removal, in-hospital length, and scar quality. RESULTS Analysis of patient demographics showed an equal distribution with regard to the age, smoking status, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative chemotherapy, and previous abdominal surgery in both groups. Significantly more patients with obesity (29.6 vs. 15.8%; p = .01) and bilateral breast reconstruction (40.8 vs. 27.6%; p = .04) were included in the CINPT group. Compared to standard of care, the CINPT group had a lower incidence of major surgical site complications (26.0 vs. 11.2%; p = .001). There was no difference in minor surgical site complications and secondary outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION The CINPT represents a reliable tool to reduce surgical site complications on the abdominal donor-site in abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Siegwart
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center BG Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Sieber
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center BG Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center BG Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Spyridoula Maraka
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Department of Medicine, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center BG Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center BG Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|