Diabetes is associated with increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with cirrhosis-implications for surveillance and future pharmacotherapy

Association of Diabetes Mellitus with All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality among Patients with Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a comorbidity commonly presenting with metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD); however, few tests for interaction have been reported. Our target was to evaluate the prognostic implications of DM in patients with different forms of MAFLD.

METHODS

Using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) in the United States, we screened 14,797 participants aged 20-74 who received ultrasound examinations from 1988-1994. Among them, 4599 patients met the diagnosis of MAFLD, and we defined mortality as the outcome event. Survival analysis of competitive risk events was performed using Cox regression and sub-distributed risk ratio (SHR).

RESULTS

During 21.1 years of follow-up, cardiovascular diseases seemed to be the most common cause of death among MAFLD patients. Of them, DM was present in 25.48% and was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HRs: 1.427, 95% CIs: 1.256-1.621, p < 0.001) and cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular-related mortality (HRs: 1.458, 95% CIs: 1.117-1.902, p = 0.005), non-cardiovascular-related mortality (HRs: 1.423, 95% CIs: 1.229-1.647, p < 0.001), and non-cancer-related mortality (HRs: 1.584, 95% CIs: 1.368-1.835, p < 0.001), respectively). Surprisingly, this association was more significant for young patients (p-value for interaction <0.001). Moreover, DM had a greater risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among overweight and obese MAFLD patients (p-value for interaction <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DM increased the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular-related, non-cardiovascular-related, and non-cancer-related) in MAFLD patients, especially in younger patients with excess obesity.

Transient elastography in patients at risk of liver fibrosis in primary care: a follow-up study over 54 months

Background

Liver fibrosis assessment services using transient elastography are growing in primary care. These services identify patients requiring specialist referral for liver fibrosis, and provide an opportunity for recommending lifestyle change. However, there are uncertainties regarding service design, effectiveness of advice given, and frequency of follow-up.

Aim

To assess the following: (a) effectiveness of standard care lifestyle advice for weight management and alcohol consumption; (b) uptake for liver rescan; and (c) usefulness of a 4.5-year time interval of rescanning in monitoring progression of liver fibrosis.

Design & setting

Analysis of patient outcomes 4.5 years after the first ‘liver service’ attendance that included transient elastography in five GP practices in Southampton, UK.

Method

Outcomes included weight, alcohol consumption, rescan uptake, time interval between scans, and change in liver fibrosis stage.

Results

A total of 401 participants were recontacted. Mean standard deviation (± SD) weight loss was 1.2 kg±8.4 kg (P = 0.005); Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) grade increased by 7.8% (P ≤0.001). A total of n = 116/401 participants were eligible for liver rescanning and n = 59/116 (50.9%) agreed to undergo rescanning. Mean ± SD time interval between scans was 53.6±3.4 months. Liver fibrosis progressed from mild (≥6.0 kPa–8.1 kPa) to significant fibrosis (8.2 kPa–9.6 kPa) in 3.4% of patients; from mild to advanced fibrosis (9.7 kPa–13.5 kPa) and cirrhosis (≥13.6 kPa) in 15.3% of patients, and did not progress in 81.3%. No baseline factors were independently associated with liver fibrosis progression at follow-up.

Conclusion

Rescan recall attendance and adherence to lifestyle changes needs improving. Optimum time interval between scans remains uncertain. After a mean interval of 53.6 months between scans, and with no specific predictors indicated, a substantial minority (18.7%) experienced a deterioration in fibrosis grade.