Adjuvant therapy in biliary tract and gall bladder carcinomas: a review

A Review of the Etiology and Epidemiology of Gallbladder Cancer: What You Need to Know

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer of the gastrointestinal system but the most prevalent cancer of the biliary tract. This tumor is a highly fatal condition. The importance of early diagnosis cannot be overstated because GBC develops quietly with late detection. Several genetic and environmental variables have been associated with the onset of GBC. Cholelithiasis and chronic inflammation from the biliary tract and parasite infections are prime examples of environmental factors that significantly influence the development of GBC. Abnormal pancreaticobiliary duct junction and biliary cysts are examples of congenital causes. In the past decade, new imaging technologies and a more radical and aggressive surgical approach have improved patient outcomes and aided prolonged survival for GBC patients. This review article focuses on the epidemiology of GBC, its risk factors, and clinical characteristics.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of adjuvant therapy for curatively resected biliary tract cancers

Background

Recent randomized controlled trials (rcts) have contributed high-quality data about adjuvant therapy in curatively resected biliary tract cancer (btc); however, a standard approach to treating those patients still has not been developed.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of published studies and abstracts up to and including June 2018, choosing rcts involving patients with btc receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after complete surgical resection. Network meta-analysis methods were used for indirect comparisons of overall survival (os) and relapse-free survival (rfs) for various adjuvant therapies.

Results

Five rcts were included in qualitative synthesis, and three rcts (bilcap, prodige 12-accord 18, and bcat) had data sufficient for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results from the indirect comparison demonstrated no significant improvement in os for capecitabine compared with gemcitabine or with gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (gemox), the hazard ratios (hrs) being 0.82 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.53 to 1.27] and 0.86 (95% ci: 0.56 to 1.34) respectively. Similarly, no significant improvement in rfs was observed for capecitabine compared with gemcitabine or gemox.

Conclusions

Although in the present analysis, we found no statistically significant improvements in os or rfs for capecitabine compared with gemox or gemcitabine, capecitabine can-until further prospective trials are completed-be considered the standard of care in the adjuvant setting based on a single randomized phase iii study.

Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase as a predictor of benefit from S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To improve the prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma, we investigated potential biomarkers that may enable the selection of patients for whom postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is likely effective.

METHODS

The cohort of this retrospective study included 170 surgically resected cholangiocarcinoma patients, 26 with gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy (GEM group), 36 with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 group), and 103 receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy (NC group). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust patient backgrounds; 36 patients from the NC group then were selected. Immunohistochemistry of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) was performed to determine the correlation between their expression and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

After matching, the backgrounds of these three groups were unbiased. No significant improvement of DFS by adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in the whole cohort. However, among the high-OPRT-expression patients, DFS of GEM, S-1, and NC groups at 5 years was 28.8%, 53.8%, and 25.5%, respectively. The DFS of the S-1 group was significantly longer than that of the NC group (P = 0.034). On the other hand, no significant differences in DFS were observed among the low OPRT expression patients. hENT1 expression was shown to have no predictive value. Multivariate analysis of the high-OPRT-expression patients demonstrated that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy can reduce tumor recurrence (HR, 0.303; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Cholangiocarcinoma patients with high OPRT expression would benefit from postoperative adjuvant S-1 therapy, which increases the DFS. Assessment of OPRT expression may contribute to the optimization of adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma.

Preoperative Serum Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor in Cholangiocarcinoma Patients after Radical Resection: A Retrospective Analysis of 119 Patients

Aims

Although prognostic markers are important to establish therapeutic strategies in patients for conducting radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), there is still a lack of simple, valid, and repeatable markers in clinical settings. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of the preoperative serum platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in CCA patients who underwent radical resection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed CCA patients who underwent radical resection surgery in our institution from January 2011 to June 2016. Baseline PLR and other clinical pathological data were measured when patients were diagnosed initially. The prognostic value of PLR in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model and the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

This study retrospectively analyzed 119 patients who underwent radical resection of CCA. During a median follow-up time of 11.0 months, there were 99.2% recurrences and 42.9% who died, and the median OS and PFS were 9.4 months and 7.4 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis identified that elevated levels of PLR (PLR > 157.25) as a significant factor predicted poorer OS (P = 0.018, HR: 2.160, 95% CI: 1.139-4.096) and PFS (P = 0.005, HR: 1.930, 95% CI: 1.220-3.053). In subgroup analysis, PLR also effectively predicted OS (P = 0.016, HR: 2.515, 95% CI: 1.143-5.532) and PFS (P = 0.042, HR: 1.908, 95% CI: 0.982-3.713) in CCA patients with positive lymphatic metastasis and/or positive surgical margin who required adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

The preoperative serum PLR is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in CCA patients after radical resection, including patients requiring adjuvant therapy.