Overview of the outcomes of robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy

Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy under general anesthesia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the risk factors associated with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy under general anesthesia.

METHODS

The retrospective study consecutively included elderly patients (≥ 70 years old) who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy at Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 1, 2018 to August 31, 2023. The demographic characteristics, the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters were collected and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to identify the prediction of risk factors for PPCs.

RESULTS

322 patients were included for analysis, and 115 patients (35.7%) developed PPCs. Multifactorial regression analysis showed that ASA ≥ III (P = 0.006, 95% CI: 1.230 ∼ 3.532), duration of one-lung ventilation (P = 0.033, 95% CI: 1.069 ∼ 4.867), smoking (P = 0.027, 95% CI: 1.072 ∼ 3.194) and COPD (P = 0.015, 95% CI: 1.332 ∼ 13.716) are independent risk factors for PPCs after thoracoscopic lobectomy in elderly patients.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for PPCs are ASA ≥ III, duration of one-lung ventilation, smoking and COPD in elderly patients over 70 years old undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy. It is necessary to pay special attention to these patients to help optimize the allocation of resources and enhance preventive efforts.

Comparison of the Learning Curve between Uniportal and Robotic Thoracoscopic Approaches in Pulmonary Segmentectomy during the Implementation Period Using Cumulative Sum Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the learning curve and perioperative outcomes between the two approaches uVATS and RATS during their implementation periods.

METHODS

The uVATS group included 77 consecutive uVATS segmentectomies performed by HI between February 2019 and June 2022, while the RATS group included 30 between July 2022 and September 2023. The patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and learning curves were compared between the two groups. The learning curve was evaluated using operative time and cumulative sum (CUSUMOT) analysis.

RESULTS

Most patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were equivalent between the two groups. In the uVATS group, after a positive slope was observed until the 14th case (initial period), a plateau was observed until the 38th case (stable period). Finally, a negative slope was observed after the 38th case (proficiency period). In the RATS group, after a positive slope was observed until the 16th case (initial period), a plateau was observed until the 22nd case (stable period). Finally, a negative slope was observed after the 22nd case (proficiency period).

CONCLUSIONS

In segmentectomy, a surgeon reached the proficiency period earlier in RATS than in uVATS, although the trends to the stable period were similar.

The Role of Sublobar Resection for the Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer killer in the world. The standard of care for surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has been lobectomy. Recent studies have identified that sublobar resection has non-inferior survival rates compared to lobectomy, however. Sublobar resection may increase the number of patients who can tolerate surgery and reduce postoperative pulmonary decline. Sublobar resection appears to have equivalent results to surgery in patients with small, peripheral tumors and no lymph node disease. As the utilization of segmentectomy increases, there may be some centers that perform this operation more than other centers. Care must be taken to ensure that all patients have access to this modality. Future investigations should focus on examining the outcomes from segmentectomy as it is applied more widely. When employed on a broad scale, morbidity and survival rates should be monitored. As segmentectomy is performed more frequently, patients may experience improved postoperative quality of life while maintaining the same oncologic benefit.

Three-Arm Robotic Lung Resection via the Open-Thoracotomy-View Approach Using Vertical Port Placement and Confronting Monitor Setting: Focusing on Segmentectomy

To perform robotic lung resections with views similar to those in thoracotomy, we devised a vertical port placement and confronting upside-down monitor setting: the three-arm, robotic “open-thoracotomy-view approach (OTVA)”. We described the robotic OTVA experiences focusing on segmentectomy and its technical aspects. We retrospectively reviewed 114 consecutive patients who underwent robotic lung resections (76 lobectomies and 38 segmentectomies) with OTVA using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System between February 2019 and June 2022. To identify segmental boundaries, we administered indocyanine green intravenously and used the robotic fluorescence imaging system (Firefly). In all procedures, cranial-side intrathoracic structures, which are often hidden in the conventional look-up-view method, were well visualized. The mean durations of surgery and console operation were 195 and 140 min, respectively, and 225 and 173 min, for segmentectomy and lobectomy, respectively. In segmentectomy, console operation was significantly shorter (approximately 30 min, p < 0.001) and two more staplers (8.2 ± 2.3) were used compared with lobectomy (6.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.003). In both groups, median postoperative durations of chest tube placement and hospitalization were 0 and 3 days, respectively. This three-arm robotic OTVA setting offers natural thoracotomy views and can be an alternative for segmentectomy and lobectomy.

Dorsal incision shows more efficacy and safety to traditional incision in single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy of LS9+10: a non-randomized prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Segmentectomy is increasingly performed as a surgical technique. Traditional anterior axillary line and mid-axillary line video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) incision meets difficulties when dealing with left segment 9+10 (LS9+10), as the distance and angle of view make it uneasy to expose the trachea, blood vessels and intersegment plane. As an alternative, dorsal incision may be advantageous as which faces the key structures of LS9+10, may facilitate the management of trachea and blood vessels of LS9+10, but there was no clinical proof reported ever. This study is targeted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two incisions in segmentectomy of LS9+10.

METHODS

The dorsal incision is made behind the posterior axillary line, 8th intercostal space. Patients with ground glass opacity (GGO) which solid ingredients is less than 25%, locates at LS9+10, and segmentectomy of LS9+10 could ensure the cut edge were enrolled in the study and were allocated to the traditional incision group or dorsal incision group based on the parity of hospital number. Efficacy outcomes such as the duration of surgery and safety outcomes including postoperative air-leakage duration, length of hospital stay, amount of bleeding and pain score were recorded. The Independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitey U test were applied in data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were enrolled and allocated into the traditional incision group and dorsal incision group. In the traditional incision group, the average surgery time was 71.03±6.87 min (median 71.5 min), while that in the dorsal incision group was an average of 62.72±6.24 min (median 61.0 min, P=0.001). The postoperative duration of air-leakage was 2.16±1.63 and 1.36±1.33 days for traditional incision group and dorsal incision group (P=0.030), respectively. The traditional incision group had a greater length of postoperative hospital stay (3.69±1.36 days) than the dorsal incision group (3.08±1.03 days, P=0.041), when amount of bleeding and pain score showed no differences between these two groups. Data suggested a statistically significant advantage for the dorsal incision procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal incision can facilitate the segmentectomy of LS9+10, and significantly reduce the surgery time, postoperative duration of air-leakage and length of hospital stay.