Thoracic surgery and COVID-19: changes and managements during the pandemic

The impact of COVID-19 on hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China

PURPOSE

The reduction of hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume has been reported in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. In China, there is no national joint registry system and the impact of COVID-19 towards surgical volume remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China during the pandemic and evaluate its change trends.

METHODS

Annual sale numbers of prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and femoral head replacement (FHR) from 2011 to 2021 was collected from providers registered in National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). Annual surgical volume of TKA, THA, FHR, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and revision of hip/knee arthroplasty (RJA) was collected from member hospitals of Beijing Joint Society (BJS). We used linear regression to estimate the loss of surgical volume. Annual surgical volume obtained from Britain and Australian joint registries were used to make comparison.

RESULTS

In China, the surgical volume of THA/FHR, TKA, and UKA in 2020 all decreased compared to the predicted value, with a reduction of 82,525 cases (13.46%), 165,178 cases (33.50%), and 151 cases (0.65%), respectively. All the three procedures showed significant recovery in 2021. The surgical volumes of THA/FHR and UKA were 68,813 and 9402 cases higher than predicted levels, respectively, while TKA volume remained slightly below the predicted level. The regional statistics in Beijing showed similar change mode. In 2020, the surgical volume of THA/FHR, TKA, FHR, and UKA all decreased compared to the predicted value, with a reduction of 5031 cases (43.37%), 5290 cases (40.69%), 620 cases (29.18%), and 925 cases (39.11%), respectively. In 2021, with the exception of FHR, the number of these procedures increased compared to 2020, but remained below the predicted value. Compared with the data from Britain and Australia, China experienced less reduction and faster recovery in the proportions of elderly people (> 65 years old) who undergo hip and knee arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, although hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China showed a similar "restoration-recovery" change pattern with other countries, China took fewer losses in this field.

Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Propensity Matched Analysis

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has gained popularity for the treatment of lung cancer, but its quality outcome measures are still being evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of lung cancer resection using RATS versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). To achieve this aim, we conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between July 2015 and December 2020. A propensity-matched analysis was performed based on patients' performance status, forced expiratory volume in 1 s% of predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide% of predicted, and surgical procedure (lobectomy or segmentectomy). Following propensity matching, a total of 613 patients were included in the analysis, of which 328 underwent RATS, and 285 underwent VATS, with satisfactory performance indicators. The results of the analysis indicated that RATS had a significantly longer operating time than VATS (132.4 ± 37.3 versus 122.4 ± 27.7 min; mean difference of 10 min 95% CI [confidence interval], 4.2 to 15.9 min; p = 0.001). On the other hand, VATS had a significantly higher estimated blood loss compared to RATS (169.7 ± 237.2 versus 82.2 ± 195.4 mL; mean difference of 87.5 mL; 95% CI, 48.1 to 126.8 mL; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the duration of chest tubes, length of hospital stay, low- and high-grade complications, as well as readmissions and mortality within 30 days after surgery. Moreover, the number of dissected lymph-node stations was significantly higher with VATS than RATS (5.9 ± 1.5 versus 4.8 ± 2.2; mean difference of 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5; p = 0.001). Nonetheless, the percentage of patients who were upstaged after histopathological analysis of the resected lymph nodes was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, RATS and VATS yielded comparable results for most of the short-term outcomes assessed. Further research is needed to validate the implementation of RATS and identify its potential benefits over VATS.