Combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

Multicentric Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combinatorial Adjuvant Brain Metastasis Treatment by Intraoperative Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy

PURPOSE

After surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) provides a promising alternative to adjuvant external beam radiation therapy by enabling superior organ-at-risk preservation, reduction of in-hospital times, and timely admission to subsequent systemic treatments, which increasingly comprise novel targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of IORT in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other targeted therapies (TTs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a multicentric approach incorporating individual patient data from 6 international IORT centers, all patients with BMs undergoing IORT were retrospectively assessed for combinatorial treatment with ICIs/TTs and evaluated for toxicity and cumulative rates, including wound dehiscence, radiation necrosis, leptomeningeal spread, local control, distant brain progression (DBP), and estimated overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 103 lesions with a median diameter of 34 mm receiving IORT combined with immunomodulatory systemic treatment or other TTs were included. The median follow-up was 13.2 (range, 1.2-102.4) months, and the median IORT dose was 25 (range, 18-30) Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. There was 1 grade 3 adverse event related to IORT recorded (2.2%). A 4.9% cumulative radiation necrosis rate was observed. The 1-year local control rate was 98.0%, and the 1-year DBP-free survival rate was 60.0%. Median time to DBP was 5.5 (range, 1.0-18.5) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing DBP, and the cumulative leptomeningeal spread rate was 4.9%. The median estimated overall survival was 26 (range, 1.2 to not reached) months with a 1-year survival rate of 74.0%. Early initiation of immunotherapy/TTs was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward improved DBP rate and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ICIs/TTs with IORT for resected BMs does not seem to increase toxicity and yields encouraging local control outcomes in the difficult-to-treat subgroup of larger BMs. Time gaps between surgery and systemic treatment could be shortened or avoided. The definitive role of IORT in local control after BM resection will be defined in a prospective trial.

DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation).

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.

The Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition on the Risk of Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Metastatic Brain Cancer

Purpose/objective Forty percent of cancer patients develop brain metastases (BM) and are often treated with stereotactic radiation (SRS/SRT). Checkpoint inhibitor (CI) use is suspected of increasing the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). Our aim is to determine whether treatment with CI is associated with an increased risk of RN in BM patients treated with SRS/SRT. Methods We retrospectively identified the medical records of BM patients treated with SRS/SRT between 1/2017 and 12/2021 using an institutional database. RN was defined by MRI imaging read by neuroradiologists and/or surgical pathology. V12GY of patients with and without RN was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The chi-square test was used to see if RN was associated with CI use, histology, particular CI agent used, > 1 course SRS/SRT, SRS/SRT dose, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), age, or sex. Results Two hundred and fifty-nine patients treated with 455 courses of SRS/SRT were analyzed. The most common primary histologies were lung 56% (N=146), breast 14% (N= 37), melanoma 9% (N=24), and renal cancer 7% (N=18). A total of 53.8% (N = no. of patients) were treated with CI. The overall rate of any RN was 21.8% (N=27) in the CI group compared to 14.8% (N=141) in the non-CI group (p=0.174). Mean V12Gy was 15.525 cc and 9.419 cc in patients with and without RN (p=0.02768). Mean number of SRS/SRT courses was 2 and 1.53 for patients with and without RN, and >1 course of SRS/SRT was a predictor of RN (p <0.01). Other features analyzed were not significant. Conclusion RN was higher in the BM patients treated with SRS/SRT receiving CI compared to non-CI patients (21.8%, N=27, versus 14.6%, N= 16), but failed to reach statistical significance. V12Gy and > 1 course of SRS/SRT was associated with RN. Caution should be taken in treating patients with SRS/SRT and CI there might be an increased risk of RN.

Unexpected Durable Complete Response With Anti-PD-L1 Blockade in Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma: A Case Report With Host and Tumor Biomarker Analysis

We extensively characterized a metastatic UPS with a 71-month lasting complete response to immunotherapy.

Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has become a fourth pillar in the treatment of brain tumors and, when combined with radiation therapy, may improve patient outcomes and reduce the neurotoxicity. As with other combination therapies, the identification of a treatment schedule that maximizes the synergistic effect of radiation- and immune-therapy is a fundamental challenge. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling is one promising approach to systematically investigate therapeutic combinations to maximize positive outcomes within a rigorous framework. However, successful clinical translation of model-generated combinations of treatment requires patient-specific data to allow the models to be meaningfully initialized and parameterized. Quantitative imaging techniques have emerged as a promising source of high quality, spatially and temporally resolved data for the development and validation of mathematical models. In this review, we will present approaches to personalize mechanism-based modeling frameworks with patient data, and then discuss how these techniques could be leveraged to improve brain cancer outcomes through patient-specific modeling and optimization of treatment strategies.

Echinacoside Induces Mitochondria-Mediated Pyroptosis through Raf/MEK/ERK Signaling in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells

Background

Various natural compounds are effective in cancer prevention and treatment with fewer side effects than conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Considering the uncertainty of the antitumor mechanism of Echinacoside (Ech) and the fact that no study on Ech against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been explored previously, this study inquired into the anti-NSCLC effect of Ech and explored its potential mechanisms.

Methods

The IC₅₀ to Ech of the NSCLC cells was calculated based on a series of cell viability assays. Different concentrations of Ech were used to treat the cells; the proliferation activity of the cells was evaluated using EdU staining. Mitochondrial membrane potential was detected by JC-1 staining. Levels of cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 were measured by ELISA. GSH and MDA levels were measured by microplate reader. Expression of cytochrome c, NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, c-Myc, c-Fos, and Raf/MEK/ERK pathway proteins was evaluated by western blot. Meanwhile, we used xenograft, immunohistochemical staining, and H&E staining to evaluate the pharmacological effects of Ech in mice in vivo.

Results

ECH inhibited the proliferation of NSCLC cells. Ech increased the expression of pyroptosis-related proteins. Besides, Ech perturbed the mitochondrial membrane potential with the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c, accompanied by increased oxidative stress. Ech inhibited the phosphorylation levels of Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and subsequently reduced c-myc and c-fos protein expression. In addition, Ech effectively restrained the growth of tumors in vivo.

Conclusions

Ech inhibited the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Impaired mitochondria activated inflammasome, which in turn led to the pyroptosis of NSCLC cells. These findings can provide some ideas on how to use pyroptosis to treat NSCLC.