Post-implantation syndrome after frozen elephant trunk is associated with the volume of new-onset aortic thrombus

The frozen elephant trunk technique in acute aortic dissection: the ultimate solution? An institutional experience

Objective

Acute aortic dissection remains a serious emergency in the field of cardiovascular medicine and a challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons. In the present study, we seek to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques in the repair of type A acute aortic dissection.

Methods

Between April 2015 and May 2023, 213 patients (82 women, aged: 63.9 ± 13.3 years) with acute aortic dissection (205 type A and 8 non-A-non-B dissections) underwent surgical treatment in our department. A total of 45 patients were treated with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique supported by the Thoraflex™ Hybrid prosthesis, 33 received total aortic arch replacement (TAR)-standard or conventional elephant trunk-treatment, and 135 were treated with hemiarch replacement (HR). Aortic arch surgery was performed in most patients under moderate hypothermic (28°C on average) circulatory arrest, with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion through the right axillary artery.

Results

The rates of early mortality were 17.8% (38 perioperative deaths) in the whole population, 8.9% in the FET group of patients, and 33% and 17% in the TAR and HR group of patients, respectively (P-value 0.025). The rate of spinal cord injury was 2.3% (five patients), and a paresis of recurrent laryngeal occurred in 3.7% of patients (seven patients, four were treated with FET). Permanent neurological dysfunction occurred in 27 patients (12.7%). After a mean follow-up of 3 years, the rate of mid-term mortality of discharged patients was 19.4% (34 deaths: 7 FET, 4 TAR, and 23 HR) and the overall mortality rate was 33.8% [72 deaths: 11 FET (24.4%); 15 TAR (45.4%); 46 HR (34.1%)]. A total of 8 patients (17.8%) in whom FET was applied received additional endovascular treatment in the descending aorta.

Conclusions

In our institutional experience, we found that the frozen elephant trunk technique with a high-end Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis proved its surgical suitability in the treatment of acute aortic dissection with favorable outcomes. The FET technique and our perioperative management led to comparable neurological outcomes and reduced mortality rates in these emergency cases.

Fever Management after TEVAR in Patients with Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Post-implantation syndrome (PIS) is characterised as a noninfectious continuous fever and a concomitant rise in inflammatory markers shortly after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This current study aims to analyse the risk factors of PIS, postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and overall survival as well as the correlation between new-onset mural thrombus and the risk of developing PIS after TEVAR in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Patients were included who had a B dissection, both acute and chronic forms. In the acute form, both acutely complicated and uncomplicated patients were included in the study. A main point of our investigation is the postoperative fever management of PIS patients.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients with type B dissection underwent TEVAR in the University Hospital of Muenster between 2016 and 2020. The occurrence of PIS was defined as the presence of fever (> 38°C lasting longer than 24 hours in hospital) and leucocytosis (white blood cell count > 12000/µL). Patients with other possible reasons for fever and/or leucocytosis, such as a urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, or sepsis, were excluded beforehand. Besides demographic and operation-related data, inflammatory markers and therapeutic measures were evaluated before and 5 days postoperatively. Computed tomography scans were examined to calculate the volume of preexistent and new-onset mural thrombus after TEVAR.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients, 40 patients were excluded because of recent infection or bypass surgery. Of the 50 patients included in the study, 10 patients developed post-implantation syndrome. Younger patients significantly more often developed PIS after TEVAR (52.2 ± 11.6 vs. 61.5 ± 13.6, p = 0.045). New-onset thrombus after TEVAR was significantly higher in PIS patients (61 cm³ vs. 12 cm³, p < 0.001) and PIS patients often received more medical examinations (investigation of X-ray, U status, and blood cultures). There was no significant difference in overall survival for 40 months and in the incidence of MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

PIS may be related to an increased rate of new-onset thrombus. A more robust conclusion is not justified according to our study. There is no difference in overall survival.

Unveiling the Enigma of Post-implantation Syndrome Following Aortic Dissection Repair: A Case Report

Post-implantation syndrome (PIS) is a frequent complication after aortic dissection repair surgery, posing significant risks to patient recovery and survival. We present a case report of a 62-year-old male who underwent aortic dissection repair surgery and developed PIS. The patient exhibited symptoms of fever, pain, and inflammation at the surgery site, along with increased levels of inflammatory markers. He was managed with a combination of anti-inflammatory medications, pain management, and antibiotics, which gradually improved symptoms over weeks. Our case highlights the importance of recognizing the potential for PIS in patients undergoing aortic dissection repair surgery and employing timely interventions to manage this condition.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Noninfectious Fever after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is gradually becoming a first-line treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). Interestingly, according to years of experience in the treatment of ATBAD, we found that patients with ATBAD often had unexplained noninfectious fever after TEVAR. This study aims to explore its clinical characteristics and independent risk factors.

METHODS

From January 2016 to September 2021, 211 consecutive patients treated electively by TEVAR for ATBAD were included. The entry tears in all patients originated in the distal to the left subclavian artery (LSA). All patients were diagnosed with ATBAD for the first time. The definition of fever in this study was that the body temperature of patients after TEVAR exceeds 38°C.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients (53.62 ± 11.34 years, 81% men) were included in the analysis. To compare patients who did and did not have post-TEVAR fever, they were respectively classified as the fever group and the nonfever group. Fever was diagnosed in 115 (55%) patients. Preoperatively, statistical differences were recorded in age (P = 0.023) and red blood cell (P = 0.037). Age <60 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.194, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.147-4.196, P = 0.018] and duration of the operation >3 hr (OR 3.586, 95% CI 1.133-11.350, P = 0.03) were positively associated with fever. In the comparison of preoperative and postoperative experimental data, the changes in white blood cell (P = 0.046) and platelet (P = 0.007) of the 2 groups were significantly different. Hospital stay (P = 0.009) and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) in the fever group were significantly prolonged. There was no difference in survival in the mid- and long-term follow-up between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninfectious fever occurs in more than half of the patients after TEVAR (115/211, 54.5%). Patients in the fever group are younger. Age <60 years and duration of the operation >3 hr are independent risk factors for noninfectious fever in patients with ATBAD after TEVAR fever. Noninfectious fever after TEVAR may lead to prolonged hospital stay. However, it did not affect mid- and long-term prognosis.

Impact of the underlying aortic pathology on postimplantation syndrome after endovascular thoracic aortic repair

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment option of choice for almost all pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of aortic pathology on the occurrence of postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after TEVAR.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients undergoing TEVAR for aortic dissection (TAD, 25), aortic aneurysm (TAA, 26), and aortic rupture or perforated ulcer (TAR/PAU, 23) were included in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome measures were persistent inflammation at hospital discharge and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

PIS was assessed in 22.97% of all patients, predominantly in the TAD group (P=0.03). CRP increased after TEVAR (156.6±94.5, P<0.001; 108.1±57.7, P<0.01 and 117.8±70.4, P<0.05) vs. baseline (58.1±77.5, 31.94±52.1 and 31.9±52.1 mg/L, in TAD, TAA and TAR/PAU, respectively) and this increase was more accentuated in TAD group (P<0.05). Stent-length was similar in all groups (P=0.226) but correlated with postoperative CRP only in TAD (R=0.576, P=0.013). Fresh parietal thrombus correlated with CRP (R=0.4507, P=0.0005) and is (OR=1.0883, P=0.0001), together with the pathology of aortic dissection (OR=6.2268, P=0.0288), a predictor of PIS after TEVAR. Whereas mortality (5.4%) did not correlate with PIS (P=0.38) either with aortic pathology (P=0.225), hospital stay after TEVAR was significantly prolonged by PIS (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic dissection is associated with more inflammation after TEVAR than aortic aneurysm, rupture or perforated ulcer, with the amount of fresh parietal thrombus playing the most significant role in the occurrence of PIS. Importantly, PIS prolongs hospital stay but not mortality after TEVAR.

Impact of Frozen and Conventional Elephant Trunk on Aortic New-Onset Thrombus and Inflammatory Response

(1) Aim: The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the impact of frozen elephant trunk (FET) and conventional elephant trunk (CET) on aortic mural thrombus. The secondary endpoint was to investigate the incidence of persistent inflammatory response (IR) in the form of post-implantation syndrome (PIS) or persistent fever without infection focus after FET and CET, respectively, as well as the risk factors associated with its occurrence. (2) Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational study of 57 consecutive patients treated with FET and CET between April 2015 and June 2020 was performed. Demographics, procedural data, perioperative laboratory exams as well as vital parameters were recorded. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography angiography (CTA) scans were analyzed with a dedicated software. IR was defined as the presence of continuous fever (>38°, lasting > 24 h) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count > 12 × 1000/µL) developing after surgery in the absence of an infection focus. (3) Results: Fifty-seven consecutive patients (mean age 58.4 ± 12.6 years, 36.8% females) treated with FET (66.6%) or CET (33.3%) for acute aortic dissection (56.1%), post-dissection-aneurysm (19.2%) or aortic aneurysm (24.5%) were included. The median thrombus volume on CTA preoperatively was 10.1 cm3 (range 2−408 cm3). After surgery, the median new-onset mural thrombus was 9.7 cm3 (range 0.2−376 cm3). Nineteen (33.3%) patients developed IR; patients with IR were significantly younger (p = 0.027), less frequently of female gender (p = 0.003) and more frequently affected from acute dissection (p = 0.002) and stayed in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly longer (p = 0.033) than those without IR. Postoperatively, the volume of new-onset thrombus was significantly greater in the IR group (84.4 vs. 3.2 cm3, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: In the context of CET and FET, the persistent inflammatory response occurred in 33.3% of the patients with persistent fever without infection focus. IR was associated with a higher volume of new-onset thrombus and significantly prolonged ICU stay. Further studies to investigate these observations are needed.