Perioperative outcomes and lymph node assessment after induction therapy in patients with clinical N1 or N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Enhancing Patient Selection in Stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC: Invasive Lymph Node Restaging after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes plays a crucial role in the multimodal treatment of stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess the impact of restaging using endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), endoesophageal ultrasound (EUS), and transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC diagnosed with clinical stage IIIA-IIIB and metastatic ipsilateral mediastinal nodes (N2) who underwent radical pulmonary resections. Patients diagnosed with stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC and N2 mediastinal nodes were included in this study. Restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes was performed using EBUS, EUS, and TEMLA. The patients were divided into two groups based on the restaging method: the TEMLA restaging group and the chest CT scan-only group. The primary outcome measure was the 5-year OS rate, and the secondary outcome measures included median OS and survival percentages. Statistical analysis, including the log-rank test, was conducted to assess the differences between the two groups. The TEMLA restaging group demonstrated significantly better overall survival compared to the chest CT scan-only group (log-rank test, p = 0.02). This was evident through a four-fold increase in median OS (59 vs. 14 months) and a higher 5-year OS rate of 55.9% (95% CI: 40.6-71.1) compared to 25.0% (95% CI: 13.7-36.3) in the chest CT scan-only group (p = 0.003). Invasive restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes improves the selection of patients with stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) NSCLC after neoadjuvant therapy. The use of EBUS, EUS, and TEMLA provides valuable information for identifying patients who may benefit from surgery by identifying N2 to N0-1 downstaging. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating restaging procedures into the treatment decision-making process for NSCLC patients with mediastinal lymph node involvement.

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for stages IIB-IVA non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective study of feasibility and outcome

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for higher stages non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study reports the feasibility of RATS in patients with stages IIB-IVA NSCLC. A single-institute, retrospective study was conducted with patients undergoing RATS for stages IIB-IVA NSCLC, from January 2015 until January 2020. Unforeseen N2 disease was excluded. Data were collected from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit database. Conversion rate, radical (R0) resection rate, local recurrence rate and complications were analyzed, as were risk factors for conversion. RATS was performed in 95 patients with NSCLC clinical or pathological stages IIB (N = 51), IIIA (N = 39), IIIB (N = 2) and IVA (N = 3). 10.5% had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Pathological staging was T3 in 33.7% and T4 in 34.7%. RATS was completed in 77.9% with a radical resection rate of 94.8%. Lobectomy was performed in 67.4% of the total resections. Conversion was for strategic (18.9%) and emergency (3.2%) reasons. Pneumonectomy (p = 0.001), squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.001), additional resection of adjacent structures (p = 0.025) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for conversion. Major post-operative complications occurred in ten patients (10.5%) including an in-hospital mortality of 2.1% (n = 2). Median recurrence-free survival was estimated at 39.4 months (CI 16.4-62.5). Two- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 53.8% and 36.7%, respectively. This study concludes that RATS is safe and feasible in higher staged NSCLC tumors after exclusion of unforeseen N2 disease. It brings new perspective on the potential of RATS in higher stages, dealing with larger and more invasive tumors.

Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Lobectomy for Patients with N1-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

(1) Background: Despite the fact that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (RATL) has been prevalently applied for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its superiorities are still to be fully revealed for patients with metastatic N1 lymph nodes (LNs). We aim to evaluate the advantages of RATL for N1 NSCLC. (2) Methods: This retrospective study identified consecutive pathological N1 NSCLC patients undergoing RATL, video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATL), or open lobectomy (OL) in Shanghai Chest Hospital between 2014 and 2020. Further, perioperative and oncological outcomes were investigated. (3) Results: A total of 855 cases (70 RATL, 435 VATL, and 350 OL) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 70, 140, and 140 cases in the RATL, VATL, and OL groups, respectively. RATL led to (1) the shortest surgical time (p = 0.005) and lowest intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001); (2) the shortest ICU (p < 0.001) and postsurgical hospital (p < 0.001) stays as well as chest tube duration (p < 0.001); and (3) the lowest morbidities of postsurgical complications (p = 0.016). Moreover, RATL dissected more N1 (p = 0.027), more N1 + N2 (p = 0.027) LNs, and led to a higher upstaging incidence rate (p < 0.050) than VATL. Finally, RATL achieved a comparable 5-year disease-free and overall survival in relation to VATL and OL. (4) Conclusions: RATL led to the most optimal perioperative outcomes among the three surgical approaches and showed superiority in assessing N1 and total LNs over VATL, though it did achieve comparable oncological outcomes in relation to VATL and OL for N1 NSCLC patients.

Template-assisted 192Ir-based stereotactic ablative brachytherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for operable peripheral non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I clinical trial

Purpose

To evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of template-assisted ¹⁹²Ir-based stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT), combined with surgery for peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Material and methods

Patients with pathologically confirmed operable peripheral NSCLC, who underwent template-assisted SABT (30 Gy delivered in one fraction) and were scheduled for tumor resection 4-6 weeks after SABT were included in this study. The perioperative adverse reactions of SABT were recorded to evaluate safety and feasibility of SABT for neoadjuvant therapy. Dosimetric data from both simulated and actual plans were collected and compared. Imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) and dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography were scheduled before SABT and surgery to evaluate the efficacy of the neoadjuvant therapy with SABT.

Results

Patients did not experience any serious adverse events. None of the patients had a delay in receiving surgery. After 4-6 weeks, the indicators for the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy significantly decreased in all patients: gross tumor volume (p < 0.001), maximum standardized uptake value (p < 0.001), tumor blood volume (p < 0.001), and tumor blood flow (p = 0.008). Dosimetric parameters in the delivered SABT plan slightly changed from the preoperative simulation, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The efficacy of template-assisted SABT for neoadjuvant therapy was significant in operable peripheral NSCLC. Moreover, no serious adverse reactions were observed; when the coplanar template guidance technique was applied, dosimetric parameters were in good agreement between the actual SABT plan and the preoperative simulated plan.

Carinal resection

Tracheobronchial tumors with involvement of the carina represent a challenging problem in the pulmonary surgery. Carinal resection is referred to removal and reconstruction of the airway itself, whereas concomitant removal of the lung parenchyma (usually a whole lung) is termed as carinal pneumonectomy. Thorough preoperative workup of these patients is mandatory. Meticulous surgical technique and aggressive postoperative management is required for the best outcomes in these difficult cases. In the paper authors review surgical technique, evaluation and management of this challenging patient population.

Video assisted thoracic surgery vs. thoracotomy for locally advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an important part of multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), but insufficient evidence supports the feasibility and safety of video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced LSCC. This study aims to compare perioperative data and long-term survival of locally advanced LSCC patients between VATS and thoracotomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical and pathological information of patients with locally advanced LSCC who underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from October 2013 to October 2017. All patients were divided into two groups (thoracotomy and VATS) and were compared the differences in perioperative, oncological and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were analyzed in this study (67 thoracotomy and 14 VATS). VATS provided less postoperative pain (P = 0.005) and produced less volume of chest drainage (P = 0.019) than thoracotomy, but the number of resected lymph nodes was less in VATS group (P = 0.011). However, there was no significant difference in the number of resected lymph node stations and the rate of nodal upstaging between two groups. The mean disease free survival (DFS) was 32.7 ± 2.7 months for the thoracotomy group and 31.8 ± 3.0 months for the VATS group (P = 0.335); the corresponding overall survival (OS) was 41.7 ± 2.2 months and 36.4 ± 4.1 months (P = 0.925).

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with locally advanced LSCC, VATS played a positive role in postoperative recovery and associated similar survival outcome compared with thoracotomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Embolism: What Is the Relationship? A Review

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is gradually considered to be the third most common disease in the vascular disease category. Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males worldwide. Although initially appearing as distinct entities, lung cancer is a great risk factor for the development of PE. Pulmonary embolism is common in lung cancer patients, with a pooled incidence of 3.7%, and unsuspected pulmonary embolism (UPE) is also non-negligible with a rough rate ranging from 29.4% to 63%. Many risk factors of PE have been detected and could be classified into three categories: lung cancer-related, patient-related, and treatment-related factors. Decreased mean survival time could be significantly observed in lung cancer patients with PE or UPE compared to those only, but suspected PE has higher mortality than UPE. Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy benefit might be highest in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and heparin seems superior to warfarin for thrombotic prophylaxis. Periodically reassessing the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulant treatment will be an efficient treatment strategy in lung cancer patients with PE.

Safety and Feasibility of Lung Resection After Immunotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Tumors

BACKGROUND

Surgeons are increasingly asked to operate on patients with residual disease after immunotherapy. The safety and utility of lung resection in this setting are unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent lung resection within 6 months of treatment with checkpoint blockade agents for metastatic or unresectable cancer. Survival was estimated from the first resection using the Kaplan-Meier approach.

RESULTS

Database query identified 19 patients who underwent 22 resections for suspected residual disease with therapeutic intent after immunotherapy between 2012 and 2016. Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis (47%), followed by metastatic melanoma (37%). The most frequently used agents were nivolumab (32%), pembrolizumab (32%), and ipilimumab (16%). Patients received a mean of 21 doses (range, 1 to 70 doses). The final dose was administered at an average of 75 days (range, 7 to 183 days) before the operation. Anatomic resection (lobectomy or greater) was performed in 11 patients (50%). Four lobectomies were attempted minimally invasively, and one required conversion to thoracotomy. Of the resected patients, 68% had viable tumor remaining. R0 resection was achieved in 95%. Mean operative time for lobectomy was 227 minutes (range, 150 to 394 minutes). Complications occurred in 32% of patients; all but 1 were minor (grade 1/2). The 2-year overall and disease-free survival were 77% and 42%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with previously metastatic or unresectable cancer, lung resection for suspected residual disease after immunotherapy is feasible, with high rates of R0 resection. Operations can be technically challenging, but significant morbidity appears to be rare. Outcomes are encouraging, with reasonable survivals during short-interval follow-up.

[Progress of Neoadjuvant Therapy Combined with Surgery in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

肺癌是世界范围内发病率和死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤。对于可手术切除的Ⅲa/N2期非小细胞肺癌患者，目前国内外指南均推荐采用手术联合化疗、放疗等多学科治疗模式。最新研究表明，与术后辅助治疗一样，新辅助治疗（化疗或放化疗）可显著改善可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的预后，且在治疗依从性及耐受性方面具有明显优势。非小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗的对象主要是局部进展期病变，特别是临床Ⅲa/N2期患者，基本治疗模式为术前2-4周期化疗，新辅助治疗后并不增加手术相关的死亡及并发症风险，但是在决定手术时机、入路及切除范围等方面仍面临着挑战。

Effect of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether higher body mass index (BMI) affects perioperative and postoperative outcomes after robotic-assisted video-thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy by one surgeon between September 2010 and January 2015. Patients were grouped according to the World Health Organization's definition of obesity, with "obese" being defined as BMI >30.0 kg/m². Perioperative outcomes, including intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) and postoperative complication rates, were compared.

RESULTS

Over 53 months, 287 patients underwent robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy, with 7 patients categorized as "underweight," 94 patients categorized as "normal weight," 106 patients categorized as "overweight," and 80 patients categorized as "obese." Because of the relatively low sample size, "underweight" patients were excluded from this study, leaving a total cohort of 280 patients. There was no significant difference in intraoperative complication rates, conversion rates, perioperative outcomes, or postoperative complication rates among the 3 groups, except for lower risk of prolonged air leaks ≥7 days and higher risk of pneumonia in patients with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with obesity do not have increased risk of intraoperative or postoperative complications, except for pneumonia, compared with "normal weight" and "overweight" patients. Robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy is safe and effective for patients with high BMI.