Three-field lymph node dissection in treating the esophageal cancer

Clinical impact of remnant lymphatic invasion on the recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

For stage II and III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy is recommended in the Japanese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. However, recurrence of ESCC is common regardless of the NAC regimen and surgical method, and NAC demonstrates limited efficacy against recurrence. Therefore, the present study was conducted to identify risk factors of recurrence of ESCC with surgery after NAC. The outcomes of 51 patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC after NAC from 2010 to 2017 at Kyushu University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 52 patients with ESCC without NAC followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2017 were selected for comparison. Among patients who underwent NAC followed by surgery, only lymphatic invasion (LY; hazard ratio, 2.761; 95% CI, 1.86-6.43, P=0.018) was an independent factor significantly associated with 3-year recurrence-free survival in the multivariate analysis. In patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis (pN) and no LY after NAC, there was significantly less recurrence compared with patients with pN and LY (P=0.0085), whereas in patients without LY after NAC, the presence of pN was not significantly associated with recurrence (P=0.2401). There were significantly fewer LY (+) patients in the NAC (+) group (P=0.0158) compared with those in the NAC (-) group. The presence of LY was an independent risk factor for recurrence of ESCC after esophagectomy following NAC. Overall, adjuvant treatment after surgery may be required in cases with remnant LY after NAC.

Three-field versus two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A long-term survival meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the setting of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, controversy exists regarding the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy, while conclusive evidence regarding the advantages of 3-field versus 2-field lymphadenectomy remains controversial. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of 3-field lymphadenectomy versus 2-field lymphadenectomy on overall survival.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analyses were computed to compare 3-field lymphadenectomy versus 2-field lymphadenectomy in the setting of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Risk ratio, weighted mean difference, hazard ratio, and restricted mean survival time difference were used as pooled effect size measures.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (3,431 patients) were included. Overall, 1,664 (48.8%) patients underwent 3-field lymphadenectomy, and 1,767 (51.5%) underwent 2-field lymphadenectomy. Three-field lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly improved 5-year overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.90; P < .001). The restricted mean survival time difference showed a statistically significant difference between 3-field lymphadenectomy versus 2-field lymphadenectomy up to 48 months (1.6 months; P = .04), however, no significant differences were found at 60-month follow-up (1.2 months; P = .14). No significant differences were found in term of postoperative mortality, anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications, chylothorax, and recurrent nerve palsy.

CONCLUSION

For resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 3-field lymphadenectomy seems associated with a slight trend toward improved 5-year overall survival; however, its clinical benefit remains limited.

Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study

The present study aimed to introduce a novel method of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, so-called ‘modified one-piece mechanical anastomosis’ (MOMA) in McKeown esophagogastrectomy and to compare its feasibility, efficacy and safety with those of ‘conventionally double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis’ (CDHA). Between March 2016 and March 2018, 80 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy with a curative intent were included in the present study. Among them, 40 received MOMA and the other 40 received CDHA. Their medical records, including operation time, anastomotic time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications within 30 days, as well as survival rate, were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed and compared. Total operation time, anastomotic time and estimated blood loss in the MOMA group were significantly decreased compared with those in the CDHA group (207.73±2.66 vs. 225.40±3.43 min; 10.95±0.44 vs. 23.03±0.47 min; 144.50±21.14 vs. 241.75±23.75 ml; all P<0.01). Anastomotic leakage was present in 1 patient in the CDHA group, but no patients in the MOMA group (P=1.000). Anastomotic stenosis was documented in 4 and 2 patients in the MOMA and CDHA group, respectively (P=0.392). The 30-day operative mortality was 0% and no significant difference was demonstrated in postoperative complications within groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the disease-free and overall survival was compared by means of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests and no statistical difference was determined (P=0.5114 and P=0.7875, respectively). McKeown esophagogastrectomy with MOMA may be a feasible, effective and reproducible alternative with relatively satisfactory postoperative outcomes for the treatment of TE-SCC, providing shorter operation and anastomosis times, and less estimated intraoperative blood loss.

Long non-coding RNA SPRY4-IT1 as a promising indicator for three field lymph-node dissection of thoracic esophageal carcinoma

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) is one of the most common tumors worldwide. Esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection(3FLND) is the radical surgical procedure for esophageal cancer. However, 3FLND is not widely used due to it’s higher mortality rate and higher incidence of postoperative complications. There is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers that can guide the most proper lymph-node dissection in esophageal cancer patients.

Method

Ninety-two patients with thoracic ESCC undergoing 3FLND were enrolled into our study from the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Fourth Hospital affiliated to the Hebei Medical University and Hebei General Hospital between Jun 2011 and Dec 2015. Retrospectively collected data from these 92 patients was used to explore the relationship between the lymph-node metastasis、recurrence and the SPRY4-IT1 expression level and to determine whether 3FLND should be performed in patients with thoracic ESCC.

Results

The findings revealed that the SPRY4-IT1 expression was significantly higher in esophageal cancer tissues than in adjacent noncancerous tissues. (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the high expression of SPRY4-IT1 was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation (P = 0.029), T classification (P = 0.013), lymph node metastasis(P = 0.022) and pathological stage (P = 0.001). The increased expression of SPRY4-IT1 was associated with a higher risk of cervical and superior mediastinal lymph-node metastasis(P = 0.039).However, no significant association was observed between the risk of cervical and superior mediastinal lymph-node recurrence and the SPRY4-IT1 expression level in the thoracic ESCC patients performed 3FLND(P = 0.509).

Conclusions

Our data support the assumption that the high expression of SPRY4-IT1 is associated with a high risk of lymph node metastasis and it has potential application as a indicator for guiding on three-field lymph node dissection in patients with thoracic ESCC. Randomized controlled trials with a large cohort of patients will be needed to confirm this conclusion in the future.

Development and validation of nomograms to intraoperatively predict metastatic patterns in regional lymph nodes in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

An accurate intraoperative prediction of lymph node metastatic risk can help surgeons in choosing precise surgical procedures. We aimed to develop and validate nomograms to intraoperatively predict patterns of regional lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The prediction model was developed in a training cohort consisting of 487 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy with complete LN dissection from January 2016 to December 2016. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors that were incorporated into a prediction model and used to construct a nomogram. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography reported LN status and was an important comparative factor of clinical usefulness in a validation cohort. Nomogram performance was assessed in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. An independent validation cohort comprised 206 consecutive patients from January 2017 to December 2017.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression revealed three independent predictors of metastatic regional LNs, three independent predictors of continuous regional LNs, and two independent predictors of skipping regional LNs. Independent predictors were used to build three individualized prediction nomograms. The models showed good calibration and discrimination, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.737, 0.738, and 0.707. Application of the nomogram in the validation cohort yielded good calibration and discrimination, with AUC values of 0.728, 0.668, and 0.657. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the three nomograms were clinically useful in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

This study presents three nomograms that incorporate clinicopathologic factors, which can be used to facilitate the intraoperative prediction of metastatic regional LN patterns in patients with esophageal cancer.

Progress in Multimodal Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results of Multi-Institutional Trials Conducted in Japan

In Japan, the therapeutic strategies adopted for esophageal carcinoma are based on the results of multi-institutional trials conducted by the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group (JEOG), a subgroup of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Owing to the differences in the proportion of patients with squamous cell carcinoma among all patients with esophageal carcinoma, chemotherapeutic drugs available, and surgical procedures employed, the therapeutic strategies adopted in Asian countries, especially Japan, are often different from those in Western countries. The emphasis in respect of postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) shifted from postoperative radiotherapy in the 1980s to postoperative chemotherapy in the 1990s. In the 2000s, the optimal timing of administration of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy returned from the postoperative adjuvant setting to the preoperative neoadjuvant setting. Recently, the JEOG commenced a three-arm randomized controlled trial of neoadjuvant therapies (cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (CF) vs. CF + docetaxel (DCF) vs. CF + radiation therapy (41.4 Gy) (CRT)) for localized advanced ESCC, and patient recruitment has been completed. Salvage and conversion surgeries for ESCC have been developed in Japan, and the JEOG has conducted phase I/II trials to confirm the feasibility and safety of such aggressive surgeries. At present, the JEOG is conducting several trials for patients with resectable and unresectable ESCC, according to the tumor stage. Herein, we present a review of the JEOG trials conducted for advanced ESCC.

Past, present, and future of three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer

In spite of repeated appeal of the effectiveness of three-field lymphadenectomy (3FL) by Japanese esophageal surgeons, it has not been accepted worldwide as a standard therapeutic measure for thoracic esophageal cancer. In this review, a concise summary of the history of 3FL, its present position, and its future perspective is discussed. Although a lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) is one of the largest criticisms of 3FL, it seems difficult to make 3FL world-standard even if a RCT with a positive result was made. The essence of 3FL has revealed the fact that bilateral cervical paraesophageal nodes and nodes in the bilateral supraclavicular fossae are regional nodes of thoracic esophageal cancer. To let the world admit this essence should be the real endpoint of "3FL issue" without RCT. In the era of new modalities, Japanese surgeons should be free from the idea that 3FL is indispensable though the essence of 3FL should remain.

Three-Field versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most surgeons now accept lymphadenectomy as an essential feature of the operative treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Three-field and two-field lymphadenectomy are two of the most popular excision scopes among surgeons. Over recent years, researchers have performed a range of comparative studies regarding these techniques, although the conclusions remain inconsistent.

METHOD

We systematically retrieved the records of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov until October 2019 and performed preliminary and full-text screening of the articles. We used the NOS scale to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies, with only medium- and high-quality studies included. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata15 were used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies involving 1676 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using with two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy, although three-field lymphadenectomy led to the gaining of a higher number of lymph nodes, there were no significant differences between the two in terms of the number of positive lymph nodes and overall survival. Three-field lymphadenectomy also caused higher levels of intraoperative blood loss and higher morbidity of the anastomotic fistula. No significant differences in operation time, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, pneumonia, chylothorax, anastomotic stenosis, ileus, cervical nodal recurrence and hospital mortality were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our meta-analysis, two-field lymphadenectomy is recommended as a first-choice surgical treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, since the results showed a risk of bias, they should be treated with caution.

Novel technique for lymphadenectomy along left recurrent laryngeal nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

In esophageal squamous carcinoma, lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is recommended owing to its highly metastatic potential. However, this procedure is difficult due to limited working space in the left upper mediastinum, and increases postoperative complications.

AIM

To present a novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the semi-prone position.

METHODS

The fundamental concept of this novel method is to exfoliate a bilateral pedicled nerve flap, which is a two-dimensional membrane, which includes the left RLN, lymph nodes (LNs) along the left RLN, and tracheoesophageal vessels, by suspending the esophagus to the dorsal side and pushing the trachea to the ventral side (named “bilateral exposure method”). Then, the hollow-out method is performed to transform the two-dimensional membrane to a three-dimensional structure, in which the left RLN and tracheoesophageal vessels are easily distinguished and preserved during lymphadenectomy along the left RLN. This novel method was retrospectively evaluated in 116 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma from August 2016 to February 2018.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients in each group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age, gender, postoperative pneumonia, anastomotic fistula, and postoperative hospitalization. However, the number of dissected LNs along the left RLN in this novel method was significantly higher than that in the conventional method (4.17 ± 0.359 vs 2.93 ± 0.463, P = 0.0447). Moreover, the operative time and the rate of postoperative hoarseness in the novel method were significantly lower than those in the conventional method (306.0 ± 6.774 vs 335.2 ± 7.750, P = 0.0054; 4/58 vs 12/58, P = 0.0312).

CONCLUSION

This novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the semi-prone position is much safer and more effective.

Clinical significance and prognosis of supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer

Background

Although most studies proved that thoracic esophageal cancer surgery with supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLNs) metastasis could benefit, less than 30% of the 5-year survival rate remained controversy on its surgical treatment. In this study, we aimed to analyze the prognosis of SCLNs on the different segments of thoracic esophageal cancer, which will supply a reference for the treatment of this disease.

Methods

Retrospectively collected the clinical data of 163 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cancer (ESCC) and compared the effects of SCLNs on prognosis in different segments.

Results

Patients with SCLNs metastasis had a worse prognosis than the negative group (P<0.001). In the upper thoracic group, there was no significant difference in OS between SCLNs positive group and negative group (P=0.077); however, in the middle and lower thoracic group, SCLNs positive group had a worse prognosis than the negative group (P<0.001) and lymph nodes positive in other sites (except for SCLNs) (P=0.039). Multivariate analysis found that SCLNs metastasis was an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of ESCC in the middle and lower thoracic segments (P=0.007).

Conclusions

For patients with upper thoracic ESCC, SCLNs appear to be regional nodes. For the middle and lower thoracic ESCC, SCLNs should be defined as distant metastasis, and neoadjuvant therapy first may be an available therapy.

Anatomy of lymphatic drainage of the esophagus and lymph node metastasis of thoracic esophageal cancer

The lymphatic drainage of the inner layers (mucosa and submucosa) and the outer layers (muscularispropria and adventitia) of the thoracic esophagus is different. Longitudinal lymphatic vessels and long drainage territory in the submucosa and lamina propria should be the bases for bidirectional drainage and direct drainage to thoracic duct and extramural lymph nodes (LN). The submucosal vessels for direct extramural drainage are usually thick while lymphatic communication between the submucosa and intermuscular area is usually not clearly found, which does not facilitate transversal drainage to paraesophageal LN from submucosa. The right paratracheal lymphatic chain (PLC) is well developed while the left PLC is poorly developed. Direct drainage to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve LN and subcarinal LN from submucosa has been verified. Clinical data show that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is frequently present in the lower neck, upper mediastinum, and perigastric area, even for early-stage thoracic esophageal cancer (EC). The lymph node metastasis rate (LNMR) varies mainly according to the tumor location and depth of tumor invasion. However, there are some crucial LN for extramural relay which have a high LNMR, such as cervical paraesophageal LN, recurrent laryngeal nerve LN, subcarinal LN, LN along the left gastric artery, lesser curvature LN, and paracardial LN. Metastasis of thoracic paraesophageal LN seems to be a sign of more advanced EC. This review gives us a better understanding about the LNM and provides more information for treatments of thoracic EC.

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for patients with cervicothoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

For cervical and higher-level esophageal tumors, the choice of cervical anastomosis or thoracic anastomosis is still controversial. The goal of this study was to explore the optimal surgical approach for cervicothoracic esophageal squamous tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 3,802 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell tumors in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from Jan 2001 to Jan 2017. Twenty-six patients with cervical anastomosis and twenty-eight patients with thoracic anastomosis were evaluated.

Results

The cervical anastomosis group exhibited a greater number of resected lymph nodes (36.5±7.3 vs. 19.9±5.7, P<0.001). In addition, the cervical anastomosis group exhibited a higher recurrence rate (71.4% vs. 41.7%, P=0.047) and increased locoregional recurrence (P=0.040). Overall survival was not significantly different between groups (P=0.331). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that postoperative locoregional recurrence is an independent risk factor for survival (P=0.031, 95% CI: 1.114-8.952).

Conclusions

Thoracic anastomosis led to satisfactory results in patients with cervicothoracic esophageal squamous tumors.

Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery

Although multidisciplinary treatment has improved the prognosis of esophageal cancer, it is commonly associated with one of the worse prognoses. Since lymph node (LN) metastases can primarily occur from the cervical to the abdominal field, a strategy for extended LN dissection has been established. The three field LN dissection (3FD) during a transthoracic esophagectomy which is defined as a procedure for cervico-thoraco-abdominal LN dissection, was established in the 1980s' in Japan, and is currently widely accepted throughout the world. To date, various comparative trials between 3FD and two field LN dissections (2FD) have been reported and show that a transthoracic esophagectomy with 3FD is superior to 2FD for prognosis. However, in 3FD, postoperative complications, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction can be induced. Furthermore, there are few prospective trials that have compared between 2FD and 3FD. Therefore, to determine the ideal range of LN dissection, various factors (e.g., location of the primary tumor, disease progression, tumor histology, and perioperative treatment) must be considered. Recently, the efficacy of intense perioperative treatment for esophageal cancer has been reported, and the significance of minimally invasive surgical procedures are being verified. The ideal combination of perioperative treatment and feasible surgery must be established to improve the oncological outcome of esophageal cancer patients further.