False positive hepatitis C antibody test results in left ventricular assist device recipients: increased risk with age and transfusions

Pathological Consequences in Anti-HCV Antibody-Positive Organ Donation to an Anti-HCV Antibody-Negative Recipient

BACKGROUND

The need to expand the pool of available organs for transplantation has meant that the use of marginal organs is increasingly widespread. The advent of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has made it possible to consider the donation of organs from HCV-positive donors and even from viremic donors.

METHODS

In HCV-positive to HCV-negative antibody donor transplantation, the development of antibodies to HCV is uneven, depending on the organ transplanted and with differences in the time of appearance. Whether the subsequent disappearance is attributed to the development of antibodies or the transmission of immunity between donor and recipient remains unclear. In transplantation from an HCV-infected donor to a HCV-seronegative recipient, the administration of antiviral therapy to the recipient before transplantation or a few days after transplantation achieves sustained response in almost all cases. We wanted to deepen the argument by studying the data in the literature, focusing on kidney transplantation, considering that this could be of interest, particularly for possible long-term renal damage.

RESULTS

HCV infection both ongoing and previous, as well as the presence of HCV antibodies alone, can be responsible for kidney damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct-acting anti-HCV therapy has revolutionized the treatment of HCV disease and the therapeutic possibilities of transplantation. However, we believe it is useful to keep in mind the pathophysiology of HCV-related damage especially in patients with a long life expectancy, using all emerging strategies to minimize the risk of transmission of infection or development of viremia.

Real-world Experiences in the Transplantation of Hepatitis C-NAAT-positive Organs

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-positive donors have increased the organ pool. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have led to high rates of treatment success and sustained virologic response (SVR) in recipients with donor-derived HCV infection without significant adverse effects, although variability remains in the timing and duration of antivirals.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed all adult HCV-NAAT-negative transplant recipients who received an organ from HCV-NAAT-positive donors from November 24, 2018, to March 31, 2022, at Duke University Medical Center with protocolized delay of DAA initiation until after hospital discharge, with at least 180-d follow-up on all patients. Transplant and HCV-related outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Two hundred eleven transplants (111 kidneys, 41 livers, 34 hearts, and 25 lungs) were performed from HCV-NAAT-positive donors to HCV-NAAT-negative recipients. Ninety percent of recipients became viremic within 7 d posttransplant. Ninety-nine percent of recipients were initiated on pangenotypic DAAs in the outpatient setting a median of 52 d posttransplant, most commonly with 12-wk courses of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (lungs) and glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (heart, kidney, and liver). Ninety-seven percent of recipients had SVR after a first-line DAA; all ultimately achieved SVR at 12 wk after subsequent treatment courses. The median peak HCV RNA for all organ systems was 2 436 512 IU/mL; the median time from antiviral to undetectable RNA was 48 d, although differences were noted between organ groups. No patient deaths or graft losses were directly attributable to HCV infection.

Conclusions

One hundred percent of transplant recipients of HCV-NAAT-positive organs ultimately developed SVR without significant adverse effects when HCV antivirals were initiated in the outpatient setting after transplant hospitalization, suggesting that this real-world treatment pathway is a viable option.

CDC Recommendations for Hepatitis C Screening Among Adults - United States, 2020

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major source of morbidity and mortality in the United States. HCV is transmitted primarily through parenteral exposures to infectious blood or body fluids that contain blood, most commonly through injection drug use. No vaccine against hepatitis C exists and no effective pre- or postexposure prophylaxis is available. More than half of persons who become infected with HCV will develop chronic infection. Direct-acting antiviral treatment can result in a virologic cure in most persons with 8-12 weeks of all-oral medication regimens. This report augments (i.e., updates and summarizes) previously published recommendations from CDC regarding testing for HCV infection in the United States (Smith BD, Morgan RL, Beckett GA, et al. Recommendations for the identification of chronic hepatitis C virus infection among persons born during 1945-1965. MMWR Recomm Rec 2012;61[No. RR-4]). CDC is augmenting previous guidance with two new recommendations: 1) hepatitis C screening at least once in a lifetime for all adults aged ≥18 years, except in settings where the prevalence of HCV infection is <0.1% and 2) hepatitis C screening for all pregnant women during each pregnancy, except in settings where the prevalence of HCV infection is <0.1%. The recommendation for HCV testing that remains unchanged is regardless of age or setting prevalence, all persons with risk factors should be tested for hepatitis C, with periodic testing while risk factors persist. Any person who requests hepatitis C testing should receive it, regardless of disclosure of risk, because many persons might be reluctant to disclose stigmatizing risks.

Modelling the impact of different testing strategies for HCV infection in Switzerland

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of liver disease. Since symptoms of chronic liver disease usually appear only late in the course of the disease, infected individuals may remain undiagnosed until advanced disease has developed. We aimed to investigate which screening strategies would be most effective to detect individuals unaware of their infection.

METHODS

We developed a mathematical model for HCV disease progression and compared the current practice of HCV testing in Switzerland with the following screening strategies: intensive screening of active injection drug users (IDU), screening of former IDU, screening of individuals originating from countries with high HCV prevalence, screening of individuals born 1951-1985 (birth-cohort) and universal screening. All screening interventions were considered in addition to a baseline scenario that reflected the current practice of HCV testing.

RESULTS

Within the first 4 years (2018-2021), every year, on average 650 cases were diagnosed in the baseline scenario, 660 with intensified IDU screening, 760 with former IDU screening, 830 with origin-based screening, 1420 with birth-cohort screening and 1940 with universal screening. No difference in liver-related mortality and incidence of end-stage liver disease between the screening scenarios was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that only large-scale screening of the general population could substantially accelerate the rate of HCV diagnosis and treatment in Switzerland and other countries with similar epidemics. However, this implies screening of a large population with low prevalence, and may trigger considerable numbers of false-positive and borderline test results.

Seroreversion of positive anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies in left ventricular assist device recipients: Now you see them, now you don't

The clinical significance of positive anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) antibody tests in recipients of left ventricular assist devices remains unclear. In light of emerging evidence suggesting the possibility of persistent low-level HCV infection in patients with positive anti-HCV antibody test but negative HCV ribonucleic acid, it is very important to distinguish the truly false positive HCV antibodies, in recipients of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, from those suggestive of a prior clinically resolved infection or one where a low-level viremia may have persisted. We conducted a retrospective analysis of left ventricular assist device recipients at our institution. While the total incidence of positive HCV antibody with concomitantly negative HCV ribonucleic acid test (19.2%) was in keeping with the incidences reported in prior cross-sectional studies, we longitudinally followed our patients and observed a 100% seroreversion. Seroreversion, which has not been reported in other studies, occurred either during continued left ventricular assist device support (10 out of 26) or after heart transplant (7 out of 26). Hundred percent seroreversion strongly suggested that the anti-HCV antibodies were truly false positive.