Extended donor criteria in heart transplantation: a retrospective study from a single Chinese institution

Increasing donor heart use in cardiac transplantation

ABSTRACT

A shortage of donor hearts remains a critical problem in cardiac transplantation, resulting in longer recipient wait times and increased wait list mortality. The disparity between available donor hearts and patients with end-stage heart failure who need transplant is expected to grow. The donor heart pool can be increased by using organs from expanded criteria, Public Health Service increased risk, hepatitis C, and donation after circulatory death donors.

Use of extended criteria donor hearts in combined heart-kidney transplant confers greater risk of mortality

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donors (ECD) hearts have demonstrated acceptable outcomes in select populations. However, their use in patients undergoing simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has not been explored. This study is assessed the effect of ECD hearts in patients undergoing SHKT vs isolated heart transplants (IHT).

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing IHT and SHKT. Patients were stratified by receipt of ECD heart, defined as donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Interaction effects between ECDs and simultaneous kidney transplants were generated. Postoperative outcomes, risk factors, and patient/graft survival were compared across cohorts using Fine-Gray, Kaplan Meier, and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses.

RESULTS

Among 26,207 patients included, 1,766 (7%) underwent SHKT. ECD hearts were used in 25% of both IHT and SHKT cohorts. Five-year survival among SHKT/ECD patients (67.3%) was reduced (p < 0.01) compared to SHKT/SDC (80.3%), IHT/ECD (78.1%) and IHT/SCD (80.0%) groups. Among SHKT patients, use of ECD hearts was associated with increased risk (SHR: 1.48; p < 0.01) of renal graft failure compared to SCD hearts. Among SHKT patients, receipt of an ECD heart, and individual ECD criteria (coronary disease and size mismatch >20%), predicted mortality. The interaction effect of receiving both ECD and SHKT predicted mortality and graft failure (HR 1.43; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing SHKT with an ECD heart face greater risks of mortality and graft failure in comparison to those undergoing IHT with ECD hearts. Careful selection of donor organs should be applied to this high-risk cohort.

Extended criteria donor organ use for heart-lung transplantation in the modern era

BACKGROUND

Demand for donor hearts and lungs exceeds their supply. Extended Criteria Donor (ECD) organs are used to help meet this demand, but their impact on heart-lung transplantation outcomes is poorly characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The United Network for Organ Sharing was queried for data on adult heart-lung transplantation recipients (n = 447) from 2005‒2021. Recipients were stratified based on whether they received ECD hearts and/or lungs. Morbidity was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Mortality was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, log-rank tests and Cox regression. Sixty-five (14.5%) patients received two ECD organs, 134 (30.0%) received only an ECD lung, and 65 (14.5%) only an ECD heart. Recipients of two ECD organs were older, more likely to have diabetes, and more likely transplanted from 2015‒2021 (p < 0.05). Groups did not differ by pre-transplant diagnosis, intensive care unit disposition, life support use, or hemodynamics. Group five-year survival rates ranged from 54.5% to 63.2% (p = 0.428). Groups did not differ by 30-day mortality, strokes, graft rejection, or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Using ECD hearts and/or lungs for heart-lung transplantation is not associated with increased mortality and is a safe strategy for increasing donor organ supply in this complex patient population.

The Clinical Outcomes of Marginal Donor Hearts: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although the shortage of donor is a common problem worldwide, a significant portion of unutilized hearts are classified as marginal donor (MD) hearts. However, research on the correlation between the MD and the prognosis of heart transplantation (HTx) is lacking. This study was conducted to investigate the clinical impact of MD in HTx.

METHODS

Consecutive 73 HTxs during 2014 and 2021 in a tertiary hospital were analyzed. MD was defined as follows; a donor age >55 years, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, cold ischemic time >240 minutes, or significant cardiac structural problems. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative hemodynamic data, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and the survival rate were analyzed. Risk stratification by Index for Mortality Prediction after Cardiac Transplantation (IMPACT) score was performed to examine the outcomes according to the recipient state. Each group was sub-divided into 2 risk groups according to the IMPACT score (low <10 vs. high ≥10).

RESULTS

A total of 32 (43.8%) patients received an organ from MDs. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was more frequent in the non-MD group (34.4% vs. 70.7, p=0.007) There was no significant difference in PGD, 30-day mortality and long-term survival between groups. In the subgroup analysis, early outcomes did not differ between low- and high-risk groups. However, the long-term survival was better in the low-risk group (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of MD group were not significantly different from non-MD group. Particularly, in low-risk recipient, the MD group showed excellent early and long-term outcomes. These results suggest the usability of selected MD hearts without increasing adverse events.

The outcomes of marginal donor hearts compared with ideal donors: a single-center experience in Iran

Background

Heart transplantation has been considered the gold-standard treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. This study assessed the survival outcomes of marginal donor hearts compared with ideal donor hearts in Iran.

Methods

This retrospective study is based on the follow-up data of heart donors and recipients in the Sina Hospital Organ Procurement Unit. Among the 93 participants, 75 were categorized as ideal donors (group A) and 18 as marginal donors (group B). Group C included heart recipients who received a standard organ, and group D included heart recipients who received a marginal one. To analyze differences in patient characteristics among the groups, posttransplant heart survival was assessed in all groups. All data were obtained from the hospital records.

Results

The mean age of the donors was 26.27±11.44 years (median age, 28 years). The marginal age showed a significant association with donor age. The age of recipients had a significant effect on survival days in the ideal group. Most patients survived for at least 1 year, with a median of 645 days in recipients from marginal donors and 689 days in recipients from ideal donors.

Conclusions

Considering the lack of organ availability in Iran, it may be possible to use marginal donors for marginal recipients, therefore reducing the number of people on the waitlist. We also recommend establishing a national marginal donor system specifically for Iranian patients to extend the donor pool.

Current Status of and Opinions on Heart Transplantation in China

The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on recent advances in heart transplantation in China. Despite advances in pharmacologic and device treatment of chronic heart failure, long-term morbidity and mortality remain high, and many patients progress to endstage heart failure. Heart transplantation has become standard treatment for selected patients with end-stage heart failure, though challenges still exist. However, multiple advances over the past few years will improve the survival and quality-of-life of heart transplant recipients. This article elaborates on the specific characteristics of heart transplantation in China, the current issues, development trends, and related experiences with heart transplantation in Wuhan Union Hospital.

Clinical outcome of donor heart with prolonged cold ischemic time: A single-center study

OBJECTIVES

Due to the shortage of donor pool, there has been a need for organs with prolonged cold ischemic time. This study aims to evaluate the short-term results of different cold ischemic times in orthotopic heart transplantation based on a single-center experience in China.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of the heart transplant patients from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017. The recipient population was divided into four groups. Group 1: cold ischemic time greater than 8 hours; group 2: the cold ischemic time between 6 and 8 hours; group 3: the cold ischemic time between 4 and 6 hours; and group 4: cold ischemic time less than 4 hours. Efficacy indicators included after transplant survival, infection rate, rejection rate, and complications.

RESULTS

The four groups have similar donor and recipient baseline characteristics (P > .05). Cold ischemic time greater than 8 hours had more cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (127.62 ± 50.23 minutes; P = .003), CPB-assist time (86.14 ± 36.74 minutes; P = .047), and higher intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) usage rate postoperatively (47.36%; P = .010). Cold ischemic time greater than 8 hours witnessed a relatively higher mortality rate compared with the other three groups (P = .115, P =  .078, and P =  .114) during the 2-year follow-up. Survival rates of 1 and 2 years for the four groups were 78.95%, 87.13%, 87.32%, and 87.50% and 68.42%, 85.14%, 85.92%, and 83.93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cold ischemic time less than 8 hours can be reasonably applied to expand the heart transplantation donor pool. Cold ischemic time greater than 8 hours might result in longer CPB time, CPB-assist time, and higher IABP usage postoperatively. It might also affect the in-hospital and 2-years survival rate.

Recent advances in heart transplantation

Despite advances in medical and electrical therapies for heart failure, morbidity and mortality remain high and patients often progress to end-stage heart failure. Over the last five decades, heart transplantation is considered a standard therapy for select patients with end-stage heart failure. However, while heart transplantation has become a treatment of choice for end-stage heart failure, challenges still exist for improvement in the short- and long-term outcomes. While there is an increase in the number of patients with end-stage heart failure, the number of donor organs remains a major limiting factor. Heart transplantation candidates in the current era are also more complex: older, antigen-sensitized, and on mechanical circulatory support at the time of listing and transplant. Such potential heart transplant recipients have an increased chance of problems, including antibody-mediated rejection and primary graft dysfunction. Recent advances could address the current challenges and include: 1) attempts to expand the pool of donor hearts; 2) changes in heart transplantation allocation policy allowing for more equitable organ distribution; and 3) advances in the management of antibody sensitization. Developments in these areas could result in improved survival and quality of life for heart transplantation recipients.