1
|
Mohan A, Madan K, Hadda V, Mittal S, Suri T, Shekh I, Guleria R, Khader A, Chhajed P, Christopher DJ, Swarnakar R, Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Aggarwal S, Agrawal G, Ayub II, Bai M, Baldwa B, Chauhan A, Chawla R, Chopra M, Choudhry D, Dhar R, Dhooria S, Garg R, Goel A, Goel M, Goyal R, Gupta N, Manjunath BG, Iyer H, Jain D, Khan A, Kumar R, Koul PA, Lall A, Arunachalam M, Madan NK, Mehta R, Loganathan N, Nath A, Nangia V, Nene A, Patel D, Pattabhiraman VR, Raja A, Rajesh B, Rangarajan A, Rathi V, Sehgal IS, Shankar SH, Sindhwani G, Singh PK, Srinivasan A, Talwar D, Thangakunam B, Tiwari P, Tyagi R, Chandra NV, Sharada V, Vadala R, Venkatnarayan K. Guidelines for endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): Joint Indian Chest Society (ICS)/Indian Association for Bronchology (IAB) recommendations. Lung India 2023; 40:368-400. [PMID: 37417095 PMCID: PMC10401980 DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_510_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become an indispensable tool in the diagnostic armamentarium of the pulmonologist. As the expertise with EBUS-TBNA has evolved and several innovations have occurred, the indications for its use have expanded. However, several aspects of EBUS-TBNA are still not standardized. Hence, evidence-based guidelines are needed to optimize the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TBNA. For this purpose, a working group of experts from India was constituted. A detailed and systematic search was performed to extract relevant literature pertaining to various aspects of EBUS-TBNA. The modified GRADE system was used for evaluating the level of evidence and assigning the strength of recommendations. The final recommendations were framed with the consensus of the working group after several rounds of online discussions and a two-day in-person meeting. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations encompassing indications of EBUS-TBNA, pre-procedure evaluation, sedation and anesthesia, technical and procedural aspects, sample processing, EBUS-TBNA in special situations, and training for EBUS-TBNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anant Mohan
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Karan Madan
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Hadda
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Saurabh Mittal
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Tejas Suri
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Irfan Shekh
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Randeep Guleria
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Abdul Khader
- Institute of Pulmonology, Allergy and Asthma Research, Calicut, India
| | | | | | | | | | - Ritesh Agarwal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Shubham Aggarwal
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Gyanendra Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Irfan Ismail Ayub
- Department of Pulmonology, Sri Ramachandra, Medical Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Muniza Bai
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Bhvya Baldwa
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Abhishek Chauhan
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Chawla
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Jaipur Golden Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Manu Chopra
- Department of Medicine, Command Hospital Eastern Command Kolkata, India
| | - Dhruva Choudhry
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, PGIMS, Rohtak, India
| | - Raja Dhar
- Department of Pulmonology, Calcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Rakesh Garg
- Department of Onco-Anesthesia and Palliative Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ayush Goel
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Manoj Goel
- Department of Pulmonology, Fortis, Gurugram, India
| | - Rajiv Goyal
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, Delhi, India
| | - Nishkarsh Gupta
- Department of Onco-Anesthesia and Palliative Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - BG Manjunath
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, PGIMS, Rohtak, India
| | - Hariharan Iyer
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Deepali Jain
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajmal Khan
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Raj Kumar
- Director, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Delhi, India
| | - Parvaiz A. Koul
- Director, Sher-e-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | - Ajay Lall
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Max Hospital, Saket, Delhi, India
| | - M. Arunachalam
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Neha K. Madan
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravindra Mehta
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bengaluru, India
| | - N Loganathan
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Coimbatore, India
| | - Alok Nath
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Vivek Nangia
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Amita Nene
- Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | - Arun Raja
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Benin Rajesh
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amith Rangarajan
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vidushi Rathi
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sujay H. Shankar
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Girish Sindhwani
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| | - Pawan K. Singh
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, PGIMS, Rohtak, India
| | | | | | | | - Pawan Tiwari
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rahul Tyagi
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Naren V. Chandra
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - V. Sharada
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rohit Vadala
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kavitha Venkatnarayan
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Natali F, Cancellieri A, Giunchi F, De Silvestri A, Livi V, Ferrari M, Paioli D, Betti S, Fiorentino M, Trisolini R. Interobserver agreement between pathologist, pulmonologist and molecular pathologist to estimate the tumour burden in rapid on-site evaluation smears from endosonography and guided bronchoscopy. Cytopathology 2021; 31:303-309. [PMID: 32463969 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A growing number of studies have suggested that non-pathologists can reliably assess the adequacy and malignancy in rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) smears prepared during endoscopic sampling procedures. However, no study has verified whether they can also consistently estimate the tumour burden, which is critical for the molecular profiling of lung cancer. We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement (IOA) between a pathologist, a pulmonologist (previously trained in lung and lymph node cytopathology) and a molecular pathologist for the tumour burden in ROSE smears. METHODS The ROSE smears of consecutive patients with suspected lung cancer undergoing endosonography or guided bronchoscopy were assessed independently by a pathologist, a pulmonologist and a molecular pathologist (gold standard). The IOA for the tumour burden, assessed through k-statistics, was the primary outcome. RESULTS A total of 322 ROSE smears obtained from 162 patients were evaluated. The IOA between the molecular pathologist and pulmonologist was very good (moderate to substantial), although slightly inferior to the IOA between the molecular pathologist and pathologist in the whole slide set (k: 0.707, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-0.739 vs 0.793, 95% CI: 0.762-0.815), as well as in smears prepared from lymphadenopathy (k: 0.783, 95% CI: 0.760-0.855 vs 0.827, 95% CI: 0.728-0.892) or from pulmonary nodules/masses (k: 0.558, 95% CI: 0.416-0.686 vs 0.715, 95% CI: 0.621-0.767). CONCLUSIONS A professionally trained pulmonologist can reliably estimate the tumour burden in bronchoscopically derived ROSE smears, especially in the setting of lymphadenopathy. This can be particularly useful in institutions where a cytopathologist is not available regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Natali
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cancellieri
- Pathology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.,Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | - Vanina Livi
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.,Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Paioli
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.,Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Sara Betti
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Fiorentino
- Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rocco Trisolini
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi & Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.,Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathew R, Meena N, Roy WE, Chen C, Macchiraella M, Bartter T. Rapid On-Site Cytologic Evaluation: A Feasibility Study Using Ancillary Interventional Pulmonary Personnel. Respiration 2021; 100:1-6. [PMID: 33540414 DOI: 10.1159/000513432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ancillary health professionals helping in a procedural service is a common practice everywhere. OBJECTIVES This was a proof-of-concept study to assess feasibility of using ancillary personnel for rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) at interventional pulmonary procedures. METHODS After a training interval, a respiratory therapist (RT) performed ROSE on consecutive interventional pulmonary specimens. Sample sites included lymph nodes, lung, liver, and the left adrenal gland. RT findings were subsequently correlated with blinded cytopathology-performed ROSE and with final histopathology results, with primary foci of adequacy and the presence or absence of malignancy. RESULTS Seventy consecutive cases involved 163 separate sites for ROSE analysis. Adequacy: There was a high level of concordance between RT-performed ROSE (RT-ROSE) and cytopathology ROSE (CYTO-ROSE). They agreed upon the adequacy of 159 specimens. The Cohen's κ coefficient ± asymptotic standard error (ASE) was 0.74 ± 0.175, with p < 0.0001. Malignancy: RT-ROSE concurred highly with CYTO-ROSE, with agreement on 150 (92%) of the 163 specimens. Cohen's κ coefficient ± ASE was 0.83 ± 0.045, with p < 0.0001. When the comparison was for malignancy by case rather than individual site, Cohen's κ coefficient ± ASE was 0.68 ± 0.08, with p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that ancillary personnel supporting an interventional pulmonary service can be trained to perform initial ROSE. Cytopathology can be called after sampling and staining have produced adequate samples. This setup streamlines ROSE evaluation with regard to time and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshen Mathew
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA,
| | - Nikhil Meena
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Winnie Elma Roy
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Chien Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Maggie Macchiraella
- Respiratory Department, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Thaddeus Bartter
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen X, Wan B, Xu Y, Song Y, Zhan P, Huang L, Liu H, Lin D, Lv T. Efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019; 8:1029-1044. [PMID: 32010580 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Although rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is gradually becoming an integral part of the modern Interventional Pulmonology, the clinical benefit of ROSE is still a matter of controversy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to clarify whether ROSE is effective in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes, synchronously, to assess circumstances under which ROSE makes more sense. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing any outcome between ROSE and no-ROSE group in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. Statistical calculations were conducted using Review Manager, version 5.3, and Stata Release 12.0. Meta-analysis was completed using a random-effects model when I2≥50% or a fixed-effect otherwise. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2-statistic test. Publication bias was assessed by the Begg's test. Results This Literature search yielded 27 studies altogether. The pooled risk difference of adequate rate was 0.12 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.07-0.16, I2=0%], the combined risk difference (RD) of diagnostic yield was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.09-0.18, I2=57%) while the pooled RD of sensitivity for malignancy was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14, I2 =20%). Significant heterogeneity only existed in diagnostic yield (I2=57%, P=0.001). Further subgroup analysis documented a higher increase in diagnostic yield when sampling solid pulmonary lesions than sampling hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20, I2=0%) versus 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13, I2=10%) and when applied to patients with suspected/diagnosed lung cancer than unselected patients 0.12 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.18) versus 0.11 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.28). Conclusions ROSE is a useful technology in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes, especially when sampling solid pulmonary lesions or applied to patients with suspected lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Chen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Bing Wan
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Yangyang Xu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Yong Song
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Ping Zhan
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Litang Huang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Hongbing Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Dang Lin
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215001, China
| | - Tangfeng Lv
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210002, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210002, China
| |
Collapse
|