The utility of bronchoscopy in immunocompromised patients: a review

A Longitudinal Study of Multimodal Bronchoscopy Training in Uganda

Background

Flexible bronchoscopy is an essential tool in diagnosing and managing pulmonary diseases. However, there is limited capacity for bronchoscopy in low and middle income countries (LMICs). In 2019, a pilot program for flexible bronchoscopy training was launched for local physicians in Kampala, Uganda. We then conducted a follow up multimodal bronchoscopy course after 2 years.

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess a longitudinal multimodal bronchoscopy training in an LMIC setting.

Methods

A multimodal follow up curriculum was developed with pulmonologists from Uganda and the United States. The training was delivered to Ugandan providers who attended previous bronchoscopy training and new participants. The training included a prepared curriculum consisting of lectures, simulations, and deliberate practice-based proctoring. A 12-question multiple-choice exam was administered at the beginning and end of the course, assessing knowledge. Procedural competency was measured using a validated assessment tool called the BSTAT (Bronchoscopic Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool). Results were analyzed to evaluate the retention of knowledge among those who took part in previous training and the efficacy of the follow-up curriculum for participants without previous training.

Results

Among the participants who attended didactic training in 2022 (11), mean exam scores were improved after training, from 43.9 (standard deviation [SD], 11.3) to 59.8 (SD, 16.1) (mean difference [MD], +15.9; SD, 13.9; P = 0.008), but were lower compared with post didactic scores in 2019: 90.8 (SD, 6.1; MD, -31; P < 0.0001). Participants who completed BSTAT assessments (8) had mean scores similar in 2019 and 2022, at 72.1 and 75.2, respectively (MD, 3.1; P = 0.38).

Conclusion

This study provides an example of how a longitudinal multimodal bronchoscopy curriculum can improve competency and proficiency for local physicians in an LMIC.

Investigating Viral Involvement in Immunocompromised Patients Using Comprehensive Infectious Disease Testing Including FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 on Bronchoscopy: A Retrospective Study

Introduction Reports are rare on the usefulness of the FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 (FARP) using lower respiratory tract specimens. This retrospective study assessed its use, as part of a comprehensive infectious disease panel, to detect the viral causes of pneumonia using bronchoalveolar lavage samples from immunosuppressed patients. Methods This study included immunocompromised patients who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage or bronchial washing by bronchoscopy between April 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022. The collected samples were submitted for comprehensive testing, including FARP test; reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for cytomegalovirus, varicella-zoster virus DNA, and herpes simplex virus; PCR for Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA; antigen testing for Aspergillus and Cryptococcus neoformans; and loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for Legionella. Results Out of 23 patients, 16 (70%) showed bilateral infiltrative shadows on computed tomography and three (13%) were intubated. The most common causes of immunosuppression were anticancer drug use (n=12, 52%) and hematologic tumors (n=11, 48%). Only two (9%) patients tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and adenovirus by FARP. Four patients (17%) tested positive for cytomegalovirus by RT-PCR, but no inclusion bodies were identified cytologically. Nine (39%) patients tested positive for Pneumocystis jirovecii by PCR, but cytology confirmed the organism in only one case. Conclusions Comprehensive infectious disease testing, performed using bronchoalveolar lavage samples collected from lung lesions in immunosuppressed patients, showed low positive detection by FARP. The viruses currently detectable by FARP may be less involved in viral pneumonia diagnosed in immunocompromised patients.

Performance of a new single-use bronchoscope versus a marketed single-use comparator: a bench study

BACKGROUND

Single-use flexible bronchoscopes eliminate cross contamination from reusable bronchoscopes and are cost-effective in a number of clinical settings. The present bench study aimed to compare the performance of a new single-use bronchoscope (Boston Scientific EXALT Model B) to a marketed single-use comparator (Ambu aScope 4), each in slim, regular and large diameters.

METHODS

Three bronchoscopy tasks were performed: water suction and visualization, "mucus" mass (synthetic mucoid mixture) suctioned in 30 s, and "mucus" plug (thicker mucoid mixture) suction. Suction ability, task completion times, and subjective ratings of visualization and overall performance on a scale of one to 10 (best) were compared. All bronchoscopy tasks were completed by 15 physicians representing diversity in specialization including pulmonary, interventional pulmonary, critical care, anesthesia, and thoracic surgery. Each physician utilized the six bronchoscope versions with block randomization by bronchoscope and task.

RESULTS

Aspirated mean mass of "mucus" using EXALT Model B Regular was comparable to that for an aScope 4 Large (41.8 ± 8.3 g vs. 41.5 ± 5.7 g respectively, p = 0.914). In comparisons of scopes with the same outer diameter, the aspirated mean mass by weight of water and "mucus" was significantly greater for EXALT Model B than for aScope 4 (p < 0.001 for all three diameters). Mean ratings for visualization attributes were significantly better for EXALT Model B compared to aScope 4 (p-value range 0.001-0.029).

CONCLUSION

A new single-use bronchoscope provided strong suction capability and visualization compared to same-diameter marketed single-use comparators in a bench model simulation.

Sans Standardization: Effective Endoscope Reprocessing

Bronchoscopy is a commonly performed procedure within thoracic and critical care medicine. Modern bronchoscopes are technologically advanced tools made of fragile electronic components. Their design is catered to allow maximum maneuverability within the semi-rigid tracheobronchial tree. Effective cleaning and reprocessing of these tools can be a challenge. Although highly functional, the design poses several challenges when it comes to reprocessing. It is a very important step, and lapses in the procedure have been tied to nosocomial infections. The process lacks universal standardization; several organizations have developed their own recommendations. Data have shown that key stakeholders are not fully versed in the essentials of endoscope reprocessing. A significant knowledge gap exists between those performing bronchoscopy and those who are stewards of effective endoscope reprocessing. To service as a resource for bronchoscopists, this study summarizes the steps of effective reprocessing, details the important elements within a health-care facility that houses this process, and reviews some of the current data regarding the use of disposable endoscopes.

Flexible Bronchoscopy Biopsy Tools and Techniques to Optimize Diagnostic Yield: A Contemporary Review

Background:

Flexible bronchoscopy is essential in diagnosing many pathologic conditions, and tools such as lavage and biopsies using brushes, forceps, and needles are paramount to success.

Introduction:

Bronchoscopists worldwide are routinely confronted with questions about such tools regarding the type, size, utility, costs, safety, anticipated yield, and others. Does the underlying suspected condition matter to the choice of instruments used? What is the anticipated outcome for benign versus malignant diseases? These and other questions are raised daily by bronchoscopists.

Methods:

Pubmed was reviewed for research in the English language pertaining to diagnostic bronchoscopy. The literature is conflicting on the benefits of the types of tools available. The success of brush biopsies, forceps, and transbronchial needle aspiration is only partially dependent on the size of the instrument used or its other characteristics. Multiple biopsies are needed, and different approaches may be complementary in some circumstances.

Results:

By understanding the factors that involve in a biopsy, the bronchoscopist is more likely to be successful when a crucial diagnosis is mandatory.

Conclusion:

This review aims to be a reference to bronchoscopists everywhere as they contemplate their approach to flexible diagnostic bronchoscopy.

Con: Bronchoscopy is essential for pulmonary infections in patients with haematological malignancies

Whilst some patients with haematological malignancy and pulmonary infection may benefit from a bronchoscopy, this uniform approach is not justified by the literature and more studies are required to fill the void in our understanding of this areahttps://bit.ly/3bfUfs7

Critical Care of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Life-threatening complications are frequent after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and optimum critical care is essential to ensuring good outcomes. The immunologic consequences of HSCT result in a markedly different host response to critical illness. Infection is the most common cause of critical illness but noninfectious complications are frequent. Respiratory failure or sepsis are the typical presentations but the sequelae of HSCT can affect nearly any organ system. Pattern recognition can facilitate anticipation and early intervention in post-HSCT critical illness. HSCT critical care is a multidisciplinary endeavor. Continued investigation and focus on process improvement will continue to improve outcomes.

The Diagnostic Utility and Clinical Implications of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Cancer Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Lung Infiltrates

Introduction Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a dreaded complication of cancer chemotherapy and frequently associated with respiratory infections. Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) serves as a useful diagnostic tool in this regard. Objective To determine the diagnostic yield, safety and clinical implications of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in cancer patients with FN, having lung infiltrates on radiographic chest imaging. Methods We reviewed medical records of FN patients who underwent FB at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, from July 2015 till July 2018. The culture yield of BAL, resultant change of management and outcome over the subsequent 30 days were retrospectively analysed. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis. Results Ninety FN patients, with mean age 26 ± 18 years and predominantly males (65.6%, n = 59) were included in the study. Seventy-seven (85.6%) had hematological and 13 (14.4%) solid organ malignancy. The mean absolute neutrophil count was 0.20 +/- 0.36/ µL. BAL cultures were diagnostic in 40 (44%) patients; the etiology was bacterial, fungal and mixed in 25 (62.5%), 14 (35%) and one (2.5%) patient, respectively. All patients were on empirical antibiotics prior to bronchoscopy: 32 (35.6%) on antibacterial alone and 58 (64.4%) on antibacterial plus antifungal therapy. Change of management occurred in 51 (56.7%) patients after BAL results, including de-escalation from dual antibiotics in 28 (55%) and initiation of new culture sensitive antibiotic in 23 (45%). FB-associated complications developed in three (5.6%) non-intensive care patients (ICU), including transient hypoxia in two and minor hemoptysis in one patient, while five (14.8%) mechanically ventilated patients in ICU experienced worsening of oxygenation parameters within 48 hours. Overall, 24 (26.7%) patients died. Mortality was 3.7% in non-ICU and 69% in ICU setting and significantly higher in patients with fungal pneumonias (p-value 0.01) and with prolonged neutropenia (p-value 0.001). Conclusions BAL is a safe diagnostic tool for FN patients with lung infiltrates, with minimal complications and sufficient diagnostic yield to improve diagnosis and management of such patients.