Role of immunotherapy and co-mutations on KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer survival

Clinical characteristics of KRAS mutation subtypes in non-small cell lung cancer population in Xinjiang, China, and their impact on the prognosis of immunotherapy

PURPOSE

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly fatal malignancy. The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) gene profoundly impacts patient prognosis. This study aims to explore the correlation between KRAS mutation subtypes, clinical data, and the impact of these subtypes on immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor samples from 269 NSCLC patients at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were analyzed. Patients received first- or second-line therapy without targeted therapy. Molecular and clinical data were used to analysis KRAS mutation subtypes and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

KRAS mutations predominantly included G12C, G12D, and G12V subtypes. TP53 had the highest mutation frequency among KRAS mutations, followed by MST1, STK11, and KMT2C. Gender differences were noted among KRAS mutation subtypes, with G12C and G12V mutations prevalent in males, while G12D mutations were less common among males. Smokers exhibited varied KRAS mutation subtypes, with G12C and G12V prevalent in smokers and G12D in nonsmokers. KRAS mutations were mainly in lung adenocarcinoma. TTF-1 and PD-L1 expression differed significantly among KRAS mutations. Patients with G12C and G12V mutations showed higher TMB levels and better immunotherapy outcomes compared to those without KRAS mutations. Conversely, patients with G12D mutations had poorer immunotherapy responses.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutation subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and molecular characteristics and varying responses to immunotherapy. G12C and G12V mutations correlate with better immunotherapy outcomes, while G12D mutations are associated with poorer responses.

[Advances in the targeted treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) paradigmatically shows the potential of personalized and therefore precise cancer treatment. For around one third of the patients, predominantly suffering from adenocarcinoma, targetable driver mutations could be characterized in the meantime. Targeted therapies, mostly with kinase inhibitors, achieve impressive advances in the prolongation of overall survival often over many years and excellent quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted treatment is also increasingly evaluated as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in early inoperable stages of NSCLC. An absolute prerequisite for the use of personalized treatment is upfront broad molecular diagnostics before the decision on first line treatment. The limitations of personalized treatment are the so far unavoidable development of resistance mutations and increasing clonal heterogeneity during the course of the treatment. Approaches to further improve treatment results comprise the development of next-generation inhibitors, the combination of targeted substances, also with chemotherapy and the use of new immunoconjugates.

Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Long-Term Responders Receiving Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Understand from a real-world cohort the unique clinical and genomic determinants of a durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with NSCLC who received any ICI-based regimen as first or second line therapy. Long-term responders (LTR) achieved an overall survival (OS) ≥ 3 years from time of treatment start, while nonresponders (NR) were patients who had an OS of 6 to 12 months from time of treatment start. Clinical and demographic covariables were collected from electronic medical records. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze the association of a long-term response to ICI in relation to clinical and genomic variables. All P-values were considered significant at P-value < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included in this study (LTR n = 37, NR n = 35). There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, and BMI between groups. The presence of liver metastases at the time of ICI initiation and PD-L1 status were not associated with LTR to ICIs. Patients in the LTR were more likely to experience irAEs at 3-,6- and 12-months. KRAS mutant tumors were numerically more common in the LTR group (n = 13 vs. 8).

CONCLUSION

We observe no strong clinical and biomarkers of a prolonged response to ICIs. Additional large prospective cohort studies are needed to investigate the genomic footprint of long-term responders.

Abnormalities in the KRAS Gene and Treatment Options for NSCLC Patients with the G12C Mutation in This Gene-A Literature Review and Single-Center Experience

Mutations in the KRAS gene are among the most common mutations observed in cancer cells, but they have only recently become an achievable goal for targeted therapies. Two KRAS inhibitors, sotorasib and adagrasib, have recently been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with the KRAS G12C mutation, while studies on their efficacy are still ongoing. In this work, we comprehensively analyzed RAS gene mutations' molecular background, mutation testing, KRAS inhibitors' effectiveness with an emphasis on non-small cell lung cancer, the impact of KRAS mutations on immunotherapy outcomes, and drug resistance problems. We also summarized ongoing trials and analyzed emerging perspectives on targeting KRAS in cancer patients.

Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review

Over the past 20 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who now have a range of systemic treatment options including targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy (ICI), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). A proportion of these cancers have single identifiable alterations in oncogenes that drive their proliferation and cancer progression, known as "oncogene-addiction". These "driver alterations" are identified in approximately two thirds of patients with lung adenocarcinomas, via next generation sequencing or other orthogonal tests. It was noted in the early clinical development of ICIs that patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC may have differential responses to ICI. The toxicity signal for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC when treated with ICIs also seemed to differ depending on the alteration present and the specific targeted agent used. Developing a greater understanding of the underlying reasons for these clinical observations has become an important area of research in NSCLC. In this review, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ICI according to specific mutations, and consider possible future directions to mitigate safety concerns and improve the outcomes for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Recent advances in molecular targeted therapy of lung cancer: Possible application in translation medicine

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death among all cancer deaths. This cancer is classified into two different histological subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is the most common subtype, and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which is the most aggressive subtype. Understanding the molecular characteristics of lung cancer has expanded our knowledge of the cellular origins and molecular pathways affected by each of these subtypes and has contributed to the development of new therapies. Traditional treatments for lung cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Advances in understanding the nature and specificity of lung cancer have led to the development of immunotherapy, which is the newest and most specialized treatment in the treatment of lung cancer. Each of these treatments has advantages and disadvantages and causes side effects. Today, combination therapy for lung cancer reduces side effects and increases the speed of recovery. Despite the significant progress that has been made in the treatment of lung cancer in the last decade, further research into new drugs and combination therapies is needed to extend the clinical benefits and improve outcomes in lung cancer. In this review article, we discussed common lung cancer treatments and their combinations from the most advanced to the newest.

Identifying biomarkers associated with immunotherapy response in melanoma by multi-omics analysis

Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown the greatest success in melanoma treatment, only a subset of melanoma patients responds well to ICIs. Thus, identifying predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response is crucial. In this study, we took complementary advantages of immunotherapy data and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) multi-omics data to explore the predictive biomarkers for the response to immunotherapy in melanoma. We first predicted responsive and non-responsive melanomas in the TCGA skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) cohort based on both somatic mutation and transcriptome datasets which involved immunotherapy data for melanoma. This method identified 170 responsive and 56 non-responsive melanomas in TCGA-SKCM. Based on the TCGA-SKCM data, we performed a comprehensive comparison of multi-omics molecular features between responsive and non-responsive melanomas. We identified the molecular features significantly associated with immunotherapy response in melanoma at the genome, transcriptome, epigenome, and proteome levels, respectively. Our analysis confirmed certain immunotherapy response-associated biomarkers, such as tumor mutation burden (TMB), copy number alteration (CNA), intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), PD-L1 expression, and tumor immunity. Moreover, we identified some novel molecular features associated with immunotherapy response: (1) the activation of mast cells and dendritic cells correlating negatively with immunotherapy response; (2) the enrichment of many oncogenic pathways correlating positively with immunotherapy response, such as JAK-STAT, RAS, MAPK, HIF-1, PI3K-Akt, and VEGF pathways; and (3) a number of microRNAs and proteins whose expression correlates with immunotherapy response. In addition, the mTOR signaling pathway has a negative association with immunotherapy response. The novel biomarkers have potential predictive values in immunotherapy response and warrant further investigation.

Retinoid X Receptor agonists as selective modulators of the immune system for the treatment of cancer

Upon heterodimerizing with other nuclear receptors, retinoid X receptors (RXR) act as ligand-dependent transcription factors, regulating transcription of critical signaling pathways that impact numerous hallmarks of cancer. By controlling both inflammation and immune responses, ligands that activate RXR can modulate the tumor microenvironment. Several small molecule agonists of these essential receptors have been synthesized. Historically, RXR agonists were tested for inhibition of growth in cancer cells, but more recent drug discovery programs screen new molecules for inhibition of inflammation or activation of immune cells. Bexarotene is the first successful example of an effective therapeutic that molecularly targets RXR; this drug was approved to treat cutaneous T cell lymphoma and is still used as a standard of care treatment for this disease. No additional RXR agonists have yet achieved FDA approval, but several promising novel compounds are being developed. In this review, we provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms by which RXR signaling regulates inflammation and tumor immunity. We also discuss the potential of RXR-dependent immune cell modulation for the treatment or prevention of cancer and concomitant challenges and opportunities.

Reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics approaches to design multi-epitope based vaccine against oncogenic KRAS

Mutant KRAS-induced tumorigenesis is highly involved in the progression of pancreatic, lung, and breast cancer. Comparatively, KRAS G12D and KRAS G12C are the most frequent mutations that promote cancer progression and aggressiveness. Although KRAS mutant inhibitors exhibit significant therapeutic potential, day by day, they are becoming resistant among patients. Multi-epitope based cancer vaccines are a promising alternative strategy that induces an immune response against tumor antigens. In the present study, we have designed, constructed, and validated a novel multi-epitope vaccine construct against KRAS G12D and G12C mutants using reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics approaches. In addition, the vaccine construct was structurally refined and showed significant physiochemical properties, and could induce an immune response. Furthermore, the optimized vaccine construct was cloned into a pET‑28a (+) expression vector through in silico cloning. Conclusively, the multi-epitope vaccine construct is structurally stable, soluble, antigenic, non‑allergic, and non‑toxic. Further, it has to be studied in in vitro and in vivo to evaluate its therapeutic efficacy against KRAS-mutated cancers in the near future.

Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has one of the highest mortality rates among solid cancers. Late diagnosis and a lack of efficacious treatment options contribute to the dismal prognosis of HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy has presented a new milestone in the treatment of cancer. Immunotherapy has yielded remarkable treatment responses in a range of cancer types including HCC. Based on the therapeutic effect of ICI alone (programmed cell death (PD)-1/programmed death-ligand1 (PD-L)1 antibody), investigators have developed combined ICI therapies including ICI + ICI, ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and ICI + locoregional treatment or novel immunotherapy. Although these regimens have demonstrated increasing treatment efficacy with the addition of novel drugs, the development of biomarkers to predict toxicity and treatment response in patients receiving ICI is in urgent need. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells received the most attention in early studies among various predictive biomarkers. However, PD-L1 expression alone has limited utility as a predictive biomarker in HCC. Accordingly, subsequent studies have evaluated the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB), gene signatures, and multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) as predictive biomarkers. In this review, we aim to discuss the current state of immunotherapy for HCC, the results of the predictive biomarker studies, and future direction.

The use of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a global health problem affecting millions of people each year. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung cancer with various conventional treatment available in the clinic. Application of these treatments alone often results in high rates of cancer reoccurrence and metastasis. In addition, they can cause damage to healthy tissues, resulting in many adverse effects. Nanotechnology has emerged as a modality for the treatment of cancer. When used in combination with nanoparticles, it is possible to improve the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of pre-existing drugs used in cancer treatment. Nanoparticles have physiochemical properties such as small size which allowing passage through challenging areas of the body, and large surface area allows for higher doses of drugs to be brought to the tumor site. Nanoparticles can be functionalized which involves modifying the surface chemistry of the particles and allows for the conjugation of ligands (small molecules, antibodies, and peptides). Ligands can be chosen for their ability to target components that are specific to or are upregulated in cancer cells, such as targeting receptors on the tumor surface that are highly expressed in the cancer. This ability to precisely target the tumor can improve the efficacy of drugs and decrease toxic side effects. This review will discuss approaches used for targeting drugs to tumors using nanoparticles, provide examples of how this has been applied in the clinic and highlight future prospects for this technology.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC: A real-world study in a Chinese population

Background

Immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations, the superior efficacy of immunotherapy has not been elucidated and especially in real-world practice. Our study aimed to use real-world data to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant NSCLC in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted the clinical, molecular, and pathologic data from the electronic health records of patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC at Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2022. Furthermore, we evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the included patients.

Results

Between January 2018 and November 2020, 793 patients were identified with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and a total of 122 patients with KRAS mutations were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were diagnosed with stage IV (82.0%) adenocarcinoma (93.4%), along with a history of smoking (57.4%). Of these, 42% of patients received anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy (Immunotherapy-based regimens), while 58.2% of patients received chemotherapy (Chemotherapy-based regimens). The median overall survival (mOS) in this cohort was 22.9 months (95% CI: 14.1-31.7), while the median-progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.4 months (95% CI: 6.6-12.1). Patients receiving immunotherapy-based regimens displayed better mOS than those receiving chemotherapy-based regimens (45.2 vs. 11.3 months; P=1.81E-05), with no statistical difference observed in the mPFS (10.5 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.706). Patients receiving immunotherapy-based regimens either in the first line (P=0.00038, P=0.010, respectively) or second-line setting (P=0.010, P=0.026, respectively) showed benefits in both PFS and OS. Subgroup analysis indicated that in patients having KRAS G12C or non-KRAS G12C mutant types, immunotherapy showed benefits of better OS (P=0.0037, P=0.020, respectively) than chemotherapy. Moreover, in advanced NSCLCs patients with or without KRAS/TP53 co-mutation the immunotherapy-based regimen achieved longer OS and PFS than chemotherapy-based regimens.

Conclusions

In the Chinese population of patients with KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC, immunotherapy-based regimens achieved longer OS than chemotherapy-based regimens, which was independent of first or second-line setting, as well as KRAS mutational subtypes.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This retrospective study compared the effects of ICIs treatment and chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC and different mutant subtypes in the real world. The study included 95 patients with KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC. Patients treated with first-line ICIs plus platinum-containing chemotherapy had better progression-free survival (PFS) (7.4 vs 4.5 months, P = 0.035) and overall survival (OS) (24.1 vs 13.2 months, P = 0.007) than those receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy alone, and second-line ICI monotherapy was associated with better PFS (4.8 vs 3.0 months, P = 0.043) and OS (18.0 vs 13.8 months, P = 0.013) than chemotherapy monotherapy. There was no significant difference in PFS (5.267 vs 6.734 months, P = 0.969) and OS (19.933 vs 20.933 months, P = 0.808) between patients with KRAS-mutant and KRAS-wild-type NSCLC treated with ICIs or between KRAS G12C and KRAS non-G12C patients (PFS: 8.1 vs 4.8 months, P = 0.307; OS: 21.3 vs 21.8 months, P = 0.434). In summary, patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations can benefit from ICIs, but no difference between KRAS mutant subtypes was observed.

Precision oncology provides opportunities for targeting KRAS-inhibitor resistance

Novel inhibitors targeting Kirsten rat sarcoma virus homolog (KRAS) KRAS^G12C in various cancers have shown good initial efficacy, but therapy-related drug resistance eventually occurs in most patients. It has become apparent that cancer cells not only rely on novel mutations that provide escape mechanisms, but about half of them become resistant in the absence of apparent genetic mutations. Redundancies within the KRAS signaling pathways and cross-talk between these pathways - as well as other canonical cancer-driving mechanisms - not only provide challenges but also present opportunities for drug development and targeted approaches. We discuss the challenges for the duality of KRAS inhibitor drug resistance with an additional focus on nongenetic mechanisms and the potential for patient-centered combination treatments.

Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer risk

Purpose

It remains unclear why individuals living in disadvantaged neighborhoods have shorter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival. It is possible that living in these deprived areas is linked with increased risk of developing aggressive NSCLC biology. Here, we explored the association of somatic KRAS mutations, which are associated with shorter survival in NSCLC patients, and 11 definitions of neighborhood disadvantage spanning socioeconomic and structural environmental elements.

Methods

We analyzed data from 429 NSCLC patients treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2015 to 2018. Data were abstracted from medical records and each patient’s home address was used to assign publicly available indices of neighborhood disadvantage. Prevalence Ratios (PRs) for the presence of somatic KRAS mutations were estimated using modified Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, cancer stage, and histology.

Results

In the NSCLC cohort, 29% had KRAS mutation-positive tumors. We found that five deprivation indices of socioeconomic disadvantage were associated with KRAS mutation. A one decile increase in several of these socioeconomic disadvantage indices was associated with a 1.06 to 1.14 increased risk of KRAS mutation. Measures of built structural environment were not associated with KRAS mutation status.

Conclusion

Socioeconomic disadvantage at the neighborhood level is associated with higher risk of KRAS mutation while disadvantage related to built environmental structural measures was inversely associated. Our results indicate not only that neighborhood disadvantage may contribute to aggressive NSCLC biology, but the pathways linking biology to disadvantage are likely operating through socioeconomic-related stress.

KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population

BACKGROUND

KRAS is commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the prognostic and predictive impact of each G12 substitution has not been fully elucidated. The approval of specific G12C inhibitors has modified the idea of KRAS "undruggability", and although the first-line standard consists of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy, as suggested at ASCO 2022, the outcome in KRAS-mutated population is still controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively described the clinical and pathological characteristics of a homogeneous G12 mutated cohort of 219 patients treated in four Italian oncologic units. We evaluated the outcome (PFS at 18 months and OS at 30 months) of those who underwent standard first-line treatment according to PD-L1 status, focusing on differences across single mutations.

RESULTS

In the study population, 47.9% of patients harbor the KRAS G12C mutation; 20.5%, G12V; 17.4%, G12D; and 8.2%, G12A. Smoking was a common behavior of patients harboring transversions and transition mutations. PD-L1 expression does not show particular distribution in the case series, although we recorded a prevalence of PD-L1 <1% in G12V (51.4%) compared to G12A (26.7%). ICIs alone was the clinician's choice in 32.7% of patients, and the chemo-immune combination in 17.3% of patients. We described the independent prognostic role of young age (p = 0.007), female gender (p = 0.016), and an ICI-based regimen (p = 0.034) regardless of mutations. Overall, our data confirm the worst prognostic value of G12V mutation apart from treatment choice unlike the other major mutations (C, D, and A) that showed a favorable trend in PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS G12 mutations are confirmed to have different characteristics, and the outcome is influenced by ICI first-line regimen. This study provides valuable information for further analysis in the future.

Clinical and Molecular Features of KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Background: The molecular and clinical features of KRAS-mutated lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy have yet to be characterized, which could guide the development of therapeutics targeting KRAS with potential immuno-oncology treatment combinations. Research Question: Do KRAS-mutated patients with different subtypes and comutations have different clinical responses and overall survival (OS) to checkpoint inhibitors? Study Design and Methods: 87 patients with NSCLC at the City of Hope who received immune checkpoint inhibitors were identified and analyzed retrospectively. Tumor genomic alterations were extracted from the clinical data with next-generation sequencing using various platforms. Demographic, clinical, molecular, and pathological information was collected with the approval of the institutional review board of the City of Hope. OS was calculated if it was available at the study time point, and responses were determined according to the RECIST v1.1. Results: Among 87 patients, 32 had a KRAS G12C mutation (36.8%), 19 had G12V (21.9%), 18 had G12D (20.7%), 6 had G12A (6.9%), 3 had G12R (3.45%), and 10 had amplification (11.49%) and other uncommon mutations. G12D had a statistically significant Odds Ratio (OR) between patients who had responses and progression of the disease (OR (95% CI) = 0.31 (0.09−0.95), p < 0.05), with 5 G12D-mutated patients having responses and 11 G12D-mutated patients having progression of the disease. In the univariate analysis with OS, there was a trend of better OS in the G12D-mutated patients, with no statistically significant difference in terms of OS between the patients who had G12D mutation and the patients who had other KRAS mutations (HR (95% CI) = 0.53 (0.21−1.36), p = 0.185). The median OS was significantly worse with KRAS comutation CDKN2A/B loss (4.2 vs. 16.9 months, HR = 3.07 (1.09−8.69), p < 0.05) and MET (3.4 vs. 17 months, HR = 3.80 (1.44−10.05), p < 0.01), which were included for the multivariate analysis. The OS with other KRAS comutations was not statistically significant, including STK11 and KEAP1. Conclusion: KRAS mutation subtypes such as G12D and comutations such as CDKN2/A and MET may modulate the immunotherapy responses and outcomes in lung cancer.

Molecular Characteristics and the Effect of KRAS Mutation on the Prognosis of Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Xinjiang, China

Purpose

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a malignant tumor with high mortality. The Kirsten rat sarcoma vial oncogene (KRAS) gene can affect patient prognosis. In this study, we aim to explore the impact of KRAS mutation status on the clinical prognosis of NSCLC immunotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Collected tumor samples from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University and 220 patients with stage III–IV NSCLC were included the study. All patients are on first- or second-line therapy and not on targeted therapy. Based on the molecular profiles and clinical features, we analysis of the effect of KRAS mutation on the treatment outcome of NSCLC.

Results

In this study, the main mutant subtypes of KRAS were G12C, G12D, and G12V. In the KRAS mutation group, the highest mutation frequency other than KRAS was TP53, followed by STK11 and KMT2C. We found that among patients received immunotherapy, KRAS-mutant patients were more sensitive to immunotherapy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 65% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 80%. Survival analysis found that patients with KRAS mutation had better prognosis with immunotherapy than the non-KRAS mutation patients by comparing the overall survival (OS) (median OS: 18.1 months vs 12.2 months, p=0.0032) and progression-free survival (PFS) (media PFS: 7.9 months vs 3.6 months, p=0.01). We found that the patients with KRAS mutation had better prognosis with immunotherapy than with chemotherapy (median OS: 18.1 months vs 12.3 months, p=0.039, PFS 7.9 months vs 4.1 months, p=0.001). Patients with the KRAS G12C mutation had better results with immunotherapy than chemotherapy, but there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups (OS: p=0.26 PFS: p=0.055). KRAS and TP53 co-mutation and KRAS and KMT2C co-mutation may improve response to immunotherapy.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that the gene mutation profile of NSCLC in KRAS mutation group and non-KRAS mutation group were different. The patients with KRAS mutation will have better prognosis with immunotherapy.

KRAS mutated Non-Small Lung Carcinoma: A Real World Context from the Indian subcontinent

BACKGROUND

KRAS, although a common variant of occurrence (~20% of non-small-cell lung carcinoma [NSCLC]) has been untargetable, owing to the molecular structure which inherently prevents drug binding. KRAS mutations in NSCLC are associated with distinct clinical profiles including smokers and mucinous histology. KRAS G12C mutations account for ~40% KRAS altered NSCLC, but NSCLC being a geographically diverse disease, the features may be distinct in this part of the world. This is a single-center experience of KRAS-mutated NSCLC including clinical, imaging, pathologic features, and treatment patterns and outcomes.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of KRAS-mutated NSCLC. The clinicopathological features and outcomes were retrieved and collated from the medical record archives of the hospital.

RESULTS

Fifty (30.6%) patients with advanced-stage NSCLC with alterations in the KRAS gene were enrolled in the 163 patients who were tested for KRAS alterations. The median age was 61 years. Molecular detection revealed three main types of KRAS mutations viz-a-vis: G12C in 17 (34%), G12V in 9 (18%), and G12D in 6 (12%) patients. Comparing G12C versus the non-G12C mutated cases, co-mutations were common in the non-G12C subgroup (p < 0.05). Among the 36, who were treated at our center, all received chemotherapy as the first line with a median progression-free survival (PFS)of 5.4 months. The PFS of G12C was higher than the non-G12C subgroup (6.4 vs 3.8 months).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest single-center experience from the Indian subcontinent for KRAS-mutated NSCLC with distinct clinical features. It highlights the unmet need for G12C inhibitors in our country, where prevalence is equivalent to the West.

Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS, MET, FGFR, RET, BRAF, and HER2 alterations

BACKGROUND

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring driver alterations, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains uncertain. Our study aimed to examine the first-line ICI efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring KRAS, MET, FGFR, RET, BRAF, and HER2 alterations in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced NSCLC harboring KRAS, MET, FGFR, RET, BRAF, HER2 alterations or driver-negative, and were treated with first-line ICI therapy. Best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with NSCLC were included (median age, 72 years): 67% were men, 15% were never-smokers, and 83% had adenocarcinoma. The driver alterations involved KRAS (n = 21), MET (n = 6), FGFR (n = 3), RET (n = 2), BRAF (n = 2), HER2 (n = 1), and driver-negative (n = 43). The partial responses for KRAS, MET, FGFR, RET, BRAF, HER2, and driver-negative were 57%, 50%, 100%, 50%, 100%, 0%, and 47%, respectively. The median PFS (months) was 16.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3- not reached [NR]) for KRAS, 2.8 (95% CI: 2.7-NR) for MET, 11.7 (95% CI: 5.9-NR) for other alterations (FGFR, RET, BRAF, and HER2), and 10.0 (95% CI: 3.7-14.3) for driver-negative, respectively. The median OS (months) was 31.3 (95% CI: 9.0-NR) for KRAS, not reached for MET, 23.5 (95% CI: 18.3-NR) for other alterations, and 21.1 (95% CI: 15.2-NR) for driver-negative, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of the first-line ICI was similar in advanced NSCLC regardless of the driver alterations, except for MET alterations.

Daily Practice Assessment of KRAS Status in NSCLC Patients: A New Challenge for the Thoracic Pathologist Is Right around the Corner

Simple Summary

RAS mutation is the most frequent oncogenic alteration in human cancers and KRAS is the most frequently mutated, notably in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Various attempts to inhibit KRAS in the past were unsuccessful in these latter tumors. However, recently, several small molecules (AMG510, MRTX849, JNJ-74699157, and LY3499446) have been developed to specifically target KRAS G12C-mutated tumors, which seems promising for patient treatment and should soon be administered in daily practice for non-squamous (NS)-NSCLC. In this context, it will be mandatory to systematically assess the KRAS status in routine clinical practice, at least in advanced NS-NSCLC, leading to new challenges for thoracic oncologists.

Abstract

KRAS mutations are among the most frequent genomic alterations identified in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas (NS-NSCLC), notably in lung adenocarcinomas. In most cases, these mutations are mutually exclusive, with different genomic alterations currently known to be sensitive to therapies targeting EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, and NTRK. Recently, several promising clinical trials targeting KRAS mutations, particularly for KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, have established new hope for better treatment of patients. In parallel, other studies have shown that NSCLC harboring co-mutations in KRAS and STK11 or KEAP1 have demonstrated primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, the assessment of the KRAS status in advanced-stage NS-NSCLC has become essential to setting up an optimal therapeutic strategy in these patients. This stimulated the development of new algorithms for the management of NSCLC samples in pathology laboratories and conditioned reorganization of optimal health care of lung cancer patients by the thoracic pathologists. This review addresses the recent data concerning the detection of KRAS mutations in NSCLC and focuses on the new challenges facing pathologists in daily practice for KRAS status assessment.

[Research Progress of Immunotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Drive Gene Mutation]

Lung cancer is the most lethal malignancy around the world and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of all cases. Most of the NSCLC patients has "driver gene mutations" and targeted therapy achieved a relatively good efficacy, but some patients progressed or relapsed after treatment. Previous studies demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitor could improve the prognosis of advanced-stage NSCLC and prolong the survival time. However, the efficacy of immune therapy varies in NSCLC patients with different immune and molecular features. The efficacy of immune therapy was controversial in NSCLC patients with driver gene mutation. The present review will summarize the immune characteristics of NSCLC patients with driver mutation and the directions of immunotherapy for patients with driver mutation.
.

Direct Targeting KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Resistance

Simple Summary

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency around 30%, and among them KRAS G12C mutation occurs in 11% of cases. KRAS mutations were for a long time considered to be non-targetable alterations or “undruggable”. Direct inhibition is actually developped with switch-II mutant selective covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors with small molecules such as sotorasib or adagrasib preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and could be related to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptive mechanisms either in down-stream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation. Mechanisms of resistance could be classified as “on-target” mechanisms, involving KRAS G12C alterations, or “off-target” mechanisms, involving other gene alterations and/or phenotypic changes.

Abstract

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), with a frequency of around 30%, and encoding a GTPAse that cycles between active form (GTP-bound) to inactive form (GDP-bound). The KRAS mutations favor the active form with inhibition of GTPAse activity. KRAS mutations are often with poor response of EGFR targeted therapies. KRAS mutations are good predictive factor for immunotherapy. The lack of success with direct targeting of KRAS proteins, downstream inhibition of KRAS effector pathways, and other strategies contributed to a focus on developing mutation-specific KRAS inhibitors. KRAS p.G12C mutation is one of the most frequent KRAS mutation in NSCLC, especially in current and former smokers (over 40%), which occurs among approximately 12–14% of NSCLC tumors. The mutated cysteine resides next to a pocket (P2) of the switch II region, and P2 is present only in the inactive GDP-bound KRAS. Small molecules such as sotorasib are now the first targeted drugs for KRAS G12C mutation, preventing conversion of the mutant protein to GTP-bound active state. Little is known about primary or acquired resistance. Acquired resistance does occur and may be due to genetic alterations in the nucleotide exchange function or adaptative mechanisms in either downstream pathways or in newly expressed KRAS G12C mutation.

Influence of DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) System in Survival and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Retrospective Analysis

Mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) system predict the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like colon or gastric cancer. However, the MMR system’s involvement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. Addressing this issue will improve clinical guidelines in the case of mutations in the main genes of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). This work retrospectively assessed the role that these gene mutations play in the response to and survival of ICIs in NSCLC. Patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab as the second-line treatment in the University Hospital of Salamanca were enrolled in this study. Survival and response analyses were performed according to groups of MMR system gene expression (MMR expression present or deficiency) and other subgroups, such as toxicity. There was a statistically significant relationship between the best response obtained and the expression of the MMR system (p = 0.045). The presence of toxicity grade ≥ 3 was associated with the deficiency expression of MMR (dMMR/MSI-H) group (p = 0.022; odds ratio = 10.167, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.669–61.919). A trend towards greater survival and response to ICIs was observed in NSCLC and dMMR. Assessing the genes in the MMR system involved in NSCLC is key to obtaining personalized immunotherapy treatments.

The RXR Agonist MSU42011 Is Effective for the Treatment of Preclinical HER2+ Breast Cancer and Kras-Driven Lung Cancer

(1) Background: Notwithstanding numerous therapeutic advances, 176,000 deaths from breast and lung cancers will occur in the United States in 2021 alone. The tumor microenvironment and its modulation by drugs have gained increasing attention and relevance, especially with the introduction of immunotherapy as a standard of care in clinical practice. Retinoid X receptors (RXRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily and upon ligand binding, function as transcription factors to modulate multiple cell functions. Bexarotene, the only FDA-approved RXR agonist, is still used to treat cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. (2) Methods: To test the immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effects of MSU42011, a new RXR agonist, we used two different immunocompetent murine models (MMTV-Neu mice, a HER2 positive model of breast cancer and the A/J mouse model, in which vinyl carbamate is used to initiate lung tumorigenesis) and an immunodeficient xenograft lung cancer model. (3) Results: Treatment of established tumors in immunocompetent models of HER2-positive breast cancer and Kras-driven lung cancer with MSU42011 significantly decreased the tumor burden and increased the ratio of CD8/CD4, CD25 T cells, which correlates with enhanced anti-tumor efficacy. Moreover, the combination of MSU42011 and immunotherapy (anti-PDL1 and anti-PD1 antibodies) significantly (p < 0.05) reduced tumor size vs. individual treatments. However, MSU42011 was ineffective in an athymic human A549 lung cancer xenograft model, supporting an immunomodulatory mechanism of action. (4) Conclusions: Collectively, these data suggest that the RXR agonist MSU42011 can be used to modulate the tumor microenvironment in breast and lung cancer.

Screening and evaluation of the role of immune genes of brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma progression based on the TCGA and GEO databases

Background

Brain metastasis was one of the factors leading to the poor long-term prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

The expression levels of immune genes in LUAD and LUAD brain metastases tissues were analyzed in GSE161116 dataset using the GEO2R, and the levels of differential immune genes in normal lung and LUAD tissues were verified. The biological functions and signaling mechanisms of the differential immune genes were explored via Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to screen the prognostic factors of LUAD patients, and a risk model was constructed. The role of the model was checked in the development of LUAD via receiver operating characteristic analysis, gene set enrichment analysis, and Cox regression analysis.

Results

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in brain metastasis were involved in the adaptive immune response, B cell differentiation, leukocyte migration, NF-kB signaling pathway, among others. The expression levels of TNFRSF11A, MS4A2, IL11, CAMP, MS4A1, and F2RL1 were independent factors affecting the poor prognosis of LUAD patients via Cox regression analysis and Akaike information criterion. In the constructed risk model, the overall survival of LUAD patients in the high-risk group was poor. The risk model was significantly related to the gender, clinical stage, T stage, lymph node metastasis, and survival status of LUAD patients. In addition, the risk model score was an independent risk factor that affected the poor prognosis of LUAD patients. TNFRSF11A, CAMP, F2RL1, IL11, MS4A1, and MS4A2 of the risk factors had diagnostic significance in LUAD brain metastasis and LUAD. The risk model participated in cytokinetic process, cell cycle, citrate cycle TCA cycle, etc. The risk model score was correlated with the levels of B cells memory, mast cells resting, macrophages M0, mast cells activated, neutrophils, eosinophils, T cells gamma delta, and immune cell markers.

Conclusions

The risk model based on the LUAD brain metastasis immune factors TNFRSF11A, MS4A2, IL11, CAMP, MS4A1, and F2RL1 was related to the diagnosis, poor prognosis, and immune infiltrating cells of LUAD patients, and is expected to provide a reference for the development of treatment strategies for LUAD patients.

What Is New in Biomarker Testing at Diagnosis of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma? Implications for Cytology and Liquid Biopsy

The discovery and clinical validation of biomarkers predictive of the response of non-squamous non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NS-NSCLC) to therapeutic strategies continue to provide new data. The evaluation of novel treatments is based on molecular analyses aimed at determining their efficacy. These tests are increasing in number, but the tissue specimens are smaller and smaller and/or can have few tumor cells. Indeed, in addition to tissue samples, complementary cytological and/or blood samples can also give access to these biomarkers. To date, it is recommended and necessary to look for the status of five genomic molecular biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600, NTRK) and of a protein biomarker (PD-L1). However, the short- and more or less long-term emergence of new targeted treatments of genomic alterations on RET and MET, but also on others’ genomic alteration, notably on KRAS, HER2, NRG1, SMARCA4, and NUT, have made cellular and blood samples essential for molecular testing. The aim of this review is to present the interest in using cytological and/or liquid biopsies as complementary biological material, or as an alternative to tissue specimens, for detection at diagnosis of new predictive biomarkers of NS-NSCLC.

A single institution study evaluating outcomes of PD-L1 high KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first line immune checkpoint inhibitors

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of KRAS status on the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced incurable or metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50% treated with palliative-intent, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario were included. KRAS mutation status was determined via massively parallel sequencing. Primary study outcome was median overall survival (mOS).

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients (59 non-squamous, 19 squamous) were identified; only non-squamous patients were included in KRAS mutation analyses. Thirty patients (51%) were KRAS-MT (mutant), with G12C (19%), G12V (15%), and G12D (13%) accounting for the most common KRAS mutation subtypes. There was no difference in mOS between KRAS-MT and KRAS-WT (wild-type) patients (12.9 vs. 19.3 months, p = 0.879). There was a non-significant trend towards worse mOS in KRAS G12C patients compared to non-G12C and KRAS-WT patients (11.4 vs. 44.9 vs. 19.3 months, p = 0.772). On multivariable analysis, KRAS-MT status was not associated with mOS (HR 0.901, 95%CI 0.417-1.946, p = 0.791). ECOG≥2 was an independent prognostic factor for worse mOS (HR 2.853, 95%CI 1.237-6.583, p = 0.014). Immune-related adverse events did not differ between KRAS-MT and KRAS-WT groups (48% vs. 52%, p = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutation status did not have a significant impact on ICI efficacy or safety. However, a non-significant trend towards worse survival was noted in patients treated with ICI whose tumours harboured the KRAS G12C variant. This study provides valuable information for comparative analysis in the future.

The Importance of STK11/LKB1 Assessment in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas

Despite the recent implementation of immunotherapy as a single treatment or in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients do not benefit from this regimen due to primary treatment resistance or toxicity. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop efficient biomarkers that can select patients who will benefit from immunotherapy thereby providing the appropriate treatment and avoiding toxicity. One of the biomarkers recently described for the stratification of NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy are mutations in STK11/LKB1, which are often associated with a lack of response to immunotherapy in some patients. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to describe the different cellular mechanisms associated with STK11/LKB1 mutations, which may explain the lack of response to immunotherapy. Moreover the review addresses the co-occurrence of additional mutations that may influence the response to immunotherapy and the current clinical studies that have further explored STK11/LKB1 as a predictive biomarker. Additionally this work includes the opportunities and limitations to look for the STK11/LKB1 status in the therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients.

Complex Oncological Decision-Making Utilizing Fast-and-Frugal Trees in a Community Setting-Role of Academic and Hybrid Modeling

Non-small cell lung cancer is a devastating disease and with the advent of targeted therapies and molecular testing, the decision-making process has become complex. While established guidelines and pathways offer some guidance, they are difficult to utilize in a busy community practice and are not always implemented in the community. The rationale of the study was to identify a cohort of patients with lung adenocarcinoma at a City of Hope community site (n = 11) and utilize their case studies to develop a decision-making framework utilizing fast-and-frugal tree (FFT) heuristics. Most patients had stage IV (N = 9, 81.8%) disease at the time of the first consultation. The most common symptoms at initial presentation were cough (N = 5, 45.5%), shortness of breath (N = 3, 27.2%), and weight loss (N = 3, 27.2%). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ranged from 0-1 in all patients in this study. Distribution of molecular drivers among the patients were as follows: EGFR (N = 5, 45.5%), KRAS (N = 2, 18.2%), ALK (N = 2, 18.2%), MET (N = 2, 18.2%), and RET (N = 1, 9.1%). Seven initial FFTs were developed for the various case scenarios, but ultimately the decisions were condensed into one FFT, a molecular stage IV FFT, that arrived at accurate decisions without sacrificing initial information. While these FFT decision trees may seem arbitrary to an experienced oncologist at an academic site, the simplicity of their utility is essential for community practice where patients often do not get molecular testing and are not assigned proper therapy.