Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm growth is minimal at sizes that do not meet criteria for surgical repair

The cardiovascular pathologist in the aortic team

Aortic diseases require a multidisciplinary management for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up with better outcomes in referral centers using a team-based approach. The setting up of a multi-disciplinary aortic team for the discussion of complex cases has been already proposed; it is also supported by the ACC/AHA. Surgeons and radiologists, more or less other physicians such as cardiologists, geneticists, rheumatologists/internal medicine specialists and pathologists are involved into such a team. The role of the cardiovascular pathologist is to examine the aortic specimens, to diagnose and classify the aortic lesions. Herein, the role of the pathologist in the aortic team is discussed and the pathobiology of aortic diseases is reviewed for reference by pathologists. The aortic specimens are mainly obtained from emergency or elective surgical procedures on the thoracic aorta, less frequently from organ/tissue (including cardiac or heart valve) donors, post-mortem procedures or abdominal aortic surgery. In the last decade, together with the progress of medical sciences, the histological definitions and classifications of the aortic pathology are undergoing thorough revisions that are addressed to an etiopathogenetic approach because of possible clinico-pathological correlations, therapeutic and prognostic impact. Pathologists may also have an important role in research and teaching. Therefore, histological analyses of the aortic specimens require adequate sample processing and pathologist expertise because histology contributes to definite diagnosis, correct management of patients and even (in genetic diseases) families, but also to research in the challenging field of aortopathies.

Sex differences in ascending aortic size reporting and growth on chest computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

Diameter-based guidelines for prophylactic repair of ascending aortic aneurysms have led to routine aortic evaluation in chest imaging. Despite sex differences in aneurysm outcomes, there is little understanding of sex-specific aortic growth rates. Our objective was to evaluate sex-specific temporal changes in radiologist-reported aortic size as well as sex differences in aortic reporting.

METHOD

In this cohort study, we queried radiology reports of chest computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging at an academic medical center from 1994 to 2022, excluding type A dissection. Aortic diameter was extracted using a custom text-processing algorithm. Growth rates were estimated using mixed-effects modeling with fixed terms for sex, age, and imaging modality, and patient-level random intercepts. Sex, age, and modality were evaluated as predictors of aortic reporting by logistic regression.

RESULTS

This study included 89,863 scans among 46,622 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 64 [52-73]; 22,437 women [48%]). Aortic diameter was recorded in 14% (12,722/89,863 reports). Temporal trends were analyzed in 7194 scans among 1998 patients (age, 68 [60-75]; 677 women [34%]) with ≥2 scans. Aortic growth rate was significantly higher in women (0.22 mm/year [95% confidence interval 0.17-0.28] vs. 0.09 mm/year [0.06-0.13], respectively). Aortic reporting was significantly less common in women (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.52-0.56; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

While aortic growth rates were small overall, women had over twice the growth rate of men. Aortic dimensions were much less frequently reported in women than men. Sex-specific standardized assessment of aortic measurements may be needed to address sex differences in aneurysm outcomes.

Emerging role of radiogenomics in genetically triggered thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) and its complications are life-threatening conditions. Hypertension and atherosclerosis had all along been recognized as the predominant risk factors for the development of TAAD. However, it was increasingly reported that genetic factors, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), are playing an important role in the disease development. The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the rapid growth in radiomics provide a promising new platform to evaluate genetically triggered thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (GTAAD) from a new angle. This review is to present an overview of currently available knowledge regarding the use of radiomics and radiogenomics in GTAAD.

Methods

We performed literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane database from 2012 to 2022 regarding the use of radiomics and radiogenomics in GTAAD.

Key Content and Findings

There were only 13 studies on radiomics and 4 studies on radiogenomics integration retrieved from the search and it signifies there is still a significant knowledge gap in this field of translational medicine. An overview of the current knowledge of GTAAD, the workflow and role of radiomics, the radiogenomics integration for GTAAD including its potential role in the development of polygenic scores, as well as the implications, challenges, and limitations of radiogenomics research were discussed.

Conclusions

In the contemporary era, radiogenomics has been emerging as a state-of-the art approach to establish statistical correlation with radiomics features with genomic information in diagnosis, risk modeling and prediction and treatment decision in TAAD.

Avant-Garde Endovascular Stent Graft Insertion in Dissected Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Current guidelines and regulatory parameters for cardiothoracic surgery in the United States establish that open surgery is the first front line for treating ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA). Despite advances in performing endovascular procedures in thoracic aortic aneurysms, there are no approved state-of-the-art techniques that allow endovascular procedures to be performed in ATAA. Thus, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the ascending aorta, as we will demonstrate, is a useful and effective technical opportunity for treating high-risk patients with type A dissections, intramural hematomas, and pseudoaneurysms. In this case, an 88-year-old female patient was consulted due to a preliminary diagnosed descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. As a result of uncertainty regarding the initial diagnosis, abdominal-pelvic and chest computed tomography scan tests contradicted the original conclusion and surprisingly yielded a different scenario; in fact, the patient had a dissected ATAA. Using the TEVAR procedure, the patient's ATAA was treated with a thoracic GORE TAG endograft stent (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA). Four weeks later, the aneurysm was completely thrombosed, and the stent-graft was properly in place.

Association of 3-Year All-Cause Mortality and Peak Wall Stresses of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in Veterans

Risk of aortic dissection in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms is not sufficiently captured by size-based metrics. From a biomechanical perspective, dissection may be initiated when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Our objective was to assess the association between aneurysm peak wall stresses and 3-year all-cause mortality. Finite element analysis was performed in 273 veterans with chest computed tomography for surveillance of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Three-dimensional geometries were reconstructed and models developed accounting for prestress geometries. A fiber-embedded hyperelastic material model was applied to obtain circumferential and longitudinal wall stresses under systolic pressure. Patients were followed up to 3 years following the scan to assess aneurysm repair and all-cause mortality. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards were estimated for all-cause mortality based on age, aortic diameter, and peak wall stresses, treating aneurysm repair as a competing risk. When accounting for age, subdistribution hazard of mortality was not significantly increased by peak circumferential stresses (p = 0.30) but was significantly increased by peak longitudinal stresses (p = 0.008). Aortic diameter did not significantly increase subdistribution hazard of mortality in either model (circumferential model: p = 0.38; longitudinal model: p = 0.30). The effect of peak longitudinal stresses on subdistribution hazard of mortality was maximized at a binary threshold of 355kPa, which captured 34 of 212(16%) patients with diameter <5 cm, 11 of 36(31%) at 5.0-5.4 cm, and 11 of 25(44%) at ≥5.5 cm. Aneurysm peak longitudinal stresses stratified by age and diameter were associated with increased hazard of 3-year all-cause mortality in a veteran cohort. Risk prediction may be enhanced by considering peak longitudinal stresses.