Renal cell carcinoma: the oncological outcome is not the only endpoint

Oncologic surveillance after surgical treatment for clinically localized kidney cancer: UroCCR study n. 129

BACKGROUND

In 2021, the EAU Guidelines implemented a novel, expert opinion-based follow-up scheme, with a three-risk-category system for clear cell (cc) and non-cc renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) after surgery with curative intent. We aimed to validate the novel follow-up scheme and provide data-driven recurrence estimates according to risk groups, to confirm or implement the oncologic surveillance strategy.

METHODS

We identified 5,320 patients from a prospectively maintained database involving 28 French referral centers. The risk of recurrence, as either loco-regional or distant, was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method for each group (low- intermediate- or high-risk) according to ccRCC or non-ccRCC histology. The noncumulative distribution of recurrences was graphically investigated through the LOWESS smoother.

RESULTS

Two thousand two hundred ninety-three (58%), 926 (23%), and 738 (19%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk ccRCC, and 683 (50%), 297 (22%), and 383 (28%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk non-ccRCC, respectively. Median follow-up for survivors was 46 months. Overall, 661 patients experienced recurrence. Over time, the noncumulative risk of recurrence was approximately 10% for low-risk cc-RCC, non-ccRCC, and intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, with non-significant difference among the three recurrence functions (P=0.9). At 5-year, time point after which imaging should be de-intensified to biennial, the noncumulative risks of recurrence were: for intermediate risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 15% and 11%, respectively; for high-risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 24% and 8%, respectively. Among high-risk non-ccRCC patients there were 9 recurrences at 3-month. There was no significant difference between the recurrence function of high-risk non-ccRCC patients with negative imaging at 3-month and the one of intermediate-risk ccRCC (P=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the relatively low recurrence risk of patients with intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, those individuals could be followed up with a similar strategy to the low-risk category. Similarly, patients with high-risk non-ccRCC with negative imaging at 3-month, could be followed up similarly to intermediate-risk ccRCC after the 3-month time point.

Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Complex Therapeutic Challenge in the Elderly

An increase in age and the occurrence of renal cell carcinoma have been positively correlated. A strict therapeutic protocol for early diagnosis, screening, prevention, and population awareness needs to be well-established as a rationale to approach the morbidity at a treatment-eligible phase in the aged. Genetic predisposition appears to have a minor role in the disease pathology. Imaging modalities, providing high-resolution images of the tumor, have undoubtedly benefitted the diseased subset in aiding the diagnosis, however, a preliminary guideline protocol for its early implication in concordance with the initial symptoms needs to be adopted. Burdening of the geriatric age group by concomitant co-morbidities further deteriorates the devastating effects of the primary tumor, which, in total, appear to evolve as a final, complex stage of the illness in the majority, leading to an eventual high mortality rate. Despite being a challenging task for managing the tumor, age should not be considered the sole treatment barrier for approaching the disease.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The treatment landscape for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rapidly evolving. The aim of this review is to summarize the randomized-controlled trials evaluating the role of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies including neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy, and provided a brief overview of the pharmacodynamics of immunotherapy for RCC.

RESULTS

Several drugs are currently under investigation. In the neoadjuvant setting, four studies are evaluating the role of single-agent immunotherapy, one of dual-agent immunotherapy, and four studies the role of immunotherapy in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or anti-interleukin-1 beta. In the adjuvant setting, two studies are evaluating the role of single-agent immunotherapy and two of dual-agent immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The approval of immune checkpoint inhibition as a front-line therapeutic strategy for advanced RCC has also ultimately led to the investigation of these agents first in the adjuvant and then in the neoadjuvant setting. Currently, there are nine studies aimed to evaluate the role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting and four studies in the adjuvant setting.

How to Select the Optimal Candidates for Renal Mass Biopsy

Surgical treatment of small renal masses (RMs) is still characterized by a non-negligible rate of benign histology, ultimately resulting in overtreatment. Since the risk of kidney cancer increases with age and the risk of malignancy usually increases with tumor size, we created a model based on patient age, RM size, and their interaction for predicting malignant histology. As male sex is associated with a higher risk of renal malignancy, we also stratified our analyses by sex. We used data for 2252 patients with cT1N0M0 disease (1551 male [69%], 701 female [31%]). On logistic regression, both age and RM size were predictors of malignant histology. For males, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-2.80) for age and 2.04 (95% CI 1.69-2.47) for RM size; for females, the OR was 1.82 (95% CI 1.78-2.80) for age and 2.04 (95% CI 1.69-2.47) for RM size (all p ≤ 0.007), with a significant continuous-by-continuous interaction between them (p < 0.001) in both models. On decision curve analysis, the model demonstrated clinical utility for predicting malignancy at a probability of <55% for males and <60% for females. Individuals with lower probability should be considered for renal biopsy and those with higher probability for upfront surgery. The model was also more informative than RM size alone in predicting malignancy, which currently represents the only absolute criterion for active surveillance eligibility. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study we analyzed the correlation between age and tumor size for predicting tumor malignancy. The aim in management is to balance the utility of performing a biopsy and the appropriateness of upfront surgery against the ultimate goal of decreasing overtreatment.

Does race impact functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy?

Background

The role of race on functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is still a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of African American (AA) and Caucasian patients who underwent RPN and analyzed the association between race and functional outcomes.

Methods

Data was obtained from a multi-institutional database of patients who underwent RPN in 6 institutions in the USA. We identified 999 patients with complete clinical data. Sixty-three patients (6.3%) were AA, and each patient was matched (1:3) to Caucasian patients by age at surgery, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and renal score. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI). Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable semiparametric Cox regression analyses were performed to assess prevalence and predictors of significant eGFR reduction during follow-up.

Results

Overall, 252 patients were included. AA were more likely to have hypertension (58.7% vs. 35.4%, P=0.001), even after 1:3 match. Overall 42 patients (16.7%) developed AKI after surgery and 35 patients (13.9%) developed significant eGFR reduction between 3 and 15 months after RAPN. On multivariate analysis, AA race did not emerge as a significant factor for predicting AKI (OR 1.10, P=0.8). On Cox multivariable analysis, only AKI was found to be associated with significant eGFR reduction between 3 and 15 months after RAPN (HR 2.49, P=0.019).

Conclusions

Although African American patients were more likely to have hypertension, renal function outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomies were not significantly different when stratified by race. However, future studies with larger cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.

Urine microscopy and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are early predictors of acute kidney injury in patients with urinary tract infection

Objective

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common cause of morbidity and hospitalisation in the population worldwide. Upper UTI is indolent and causes subclinical acute kidney injury (AKI) resulting in preventable cause of scarring of renal parenchyma. We explored urinary and serum levels of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), haematological parameters and quantitative urine microscopy parameters to predict kidney injury.

Methods

Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is obtained by dividing absolute neutrophil count with absolute lymphocyte count. Quantitative urine sediment microscopy was performed and correlated with clinical, biochemical and haematological findings to predict AKI in patients with UTI. Quantitative ELISA was performed for serum and urine levels of KIM-1. Seventy two adult patients with UTI were enrolled, 45 of whom had AKI while 27 were in the non-AKI group.

Results

NLR (p=0.005) and renal tubular epithelial cell-granular cast score in quantitative urine microscopy (p=0.008) are strong predictors of AKI in patients with UTI while rest of quantitative urine microscopy parameters and serum and urinary levels of KIM-1 molecule were not found to be useful in prediction of AKI.

Conclusion

NLR in haemogram is a novel and useful biomarker for predicting AKI in patients with UTI.

A new strategy for the treatment of sorafenib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China: combination with intermittent chemotherapy

Background

This study assesses the clinical safety and efficacy of Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in sorafenib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients.

Methods

The baseline characteristics and survival outcomes of 19 patients suffering from metastatic and progressive sorafenib-refractory RCC were retrospectively collected and analyzed from January 2010 to April 2014. Patients were treated by combining Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m², day 1 and day 8 of every cycle of 21 days) and S-1 (40 mg/m², twice a day for 14 days, followed by the rest period of 7 days), with a continual treatment of sorafenib 400 mg twice a day in a cycle of 28 days.

Results

After combination chemotherapy, the disease control rate was 68.4%. Among them, 6 patients (31.6%) had progressive disease (PD), 5 patients (26.3%) had stable disease (SD) and 8 patients (42.1%) had partial response (PR). The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.3 months (range, 2.0-32.7 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 19.7 months (range, 5.7-45.0 months). In the survival analysis, comparing PD group, disease control (PR + SD) group showed an obviously longer TTP (median TTP: 9.5 vs. 2.0 months, 95% CI, 7.7-11.3 months, P<0.001) and OS (median OS: 21.0 vs. 8.3 months, 95% CI, 14.5-24.9 months, P<0.001). In univariate and multivariate analysis, TTP and OS were significantly associated with disease control condition. Side-effects were found in all patients at different degree, but only 3 patients suffered grade 3/4 toxicities (15.8%). No death related to treatment was observed.

Conclusions

The combination chemotherapy could be a promising treatment option for advanced metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients after sorafenib refractory.

Defining Risk Categories for a Significant Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Implications for Patient Follow-up

Following partial nephrectomy (PN), it is important to prevent any deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). At present there are no evidence-based recommendations on when a nephrology consultation should be requested and how to adjust postoperative management when the risk of renal function decline is high. In an effort to address this void, we used our previously published nomogram to define risk groups for a significant decline in eGFR at 3-15 mo after PN. We used the nomogram-derived probability as the independent variable for the classification and regression tree and identified four risk groups: low (0-10%), intermediate (10-21%), high (21-65%), and very high (65-100%). Overall, 336 (34%), 386 (39%), 243 (24%), and 34 (4%) patients fell in the low, intermediate, high, and very high risk groups, respectively. The rates of significant eGFR decline across the low, intermediate, high, and very high risk groups were 4%, 14%, 29%, and 79%. With the low risk category as a reference, the hazard ratio for eGFR decline was 3.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-5.64) for the intermediate, 7.80 (95% CI 4.52-13.48) for the high, and 27.24 (95% CI 13.8-53.8) for the very high risk group (all p<0.001). These prognostic risk categories can be used to design postoperative follow-up schedules. A multidisciplinary approach can be considered for patients at high and very high risk of eGFR decline. PATIENT SUMMARY: We propose a new stratification system to identify individuals at high risk of a decline in renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy.