1
|
Sachdeva A, McGuinness L, Zapala Ł, Greco I, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Kailavasan M, Antunes-Lopes T, Ayres B, Barreto L, Campi R, Crook J, Johnstone P, Kumar V, Manzie K, Marcus JD, Necchi A, Oliveira P, Osborne J, Pagliaro LC, Protzel C, Bryan Rumble R, Sánchez Martínez DF, Spiess PE, Tagawa ST, van der Heijden MS, Parnham AS, Pettaway CA, Albersen M, Sangar VK, Brouwer OR, Sakalis VI. Management of Lymph Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2024; 85:257-273. [PMID: 37208237 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. CONCLUSIONS Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. PATIENT SUMMARY Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Sachdeva
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Luke McGuinness
- Department of Urology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Łukasz Zapala
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Isabella Greco
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo
- Division of Urology/Uro-oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lenka Barreto
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Juanita Crook
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Veterinary Sciences Department, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - R Bryan Rumble
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Arie S Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vijay K Sangar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doersch KM, Hines L, Ajay D. Narrative review of flaps and grafts in robotic reconstructive urologic surgery. ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY 2024; 9:5. [PMID: 38938988 PMCID: PMC11210586 DOI: 10.21037/ales-23-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective Flaps and grafts are used for filling dead space, ureteral substitution, and as mesh alternatives. The surgical robot is invaluable in urologic reconstructive surgery due to the ability of the robot to reach the deep pelvis, its minimally invasive access, the ability to use indocyanine green to identify structures and assess tissue perfusion and viability, and ergonomics for the surgeon. Robotic reconstruction can involve tissue transfer in the form of flaps and grafts to provide form and function to organs that have been damaged by iatrogenic injuries, trauma, infections, cancer, radiation injury, or congenital abnormalities. Common flaps and grafts can be readily adapted to the robotic approach. In this literature review, we examine the robotic use of flaps and grafts in reconstructive urology. Methods A thorough literature review was conducted via a PubMed search for predefined terms. Key Content and Findings Flaps and grafts in reconstructive urology are used for interposition, ureteral substitution, and as mesh alternatives. Omental flaps are used for tissue interposition, or to provide structure and nutrients, and are easily employed with the robot. Various robotic applications of peritoneal flaps have been described. Vascular rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps are well-vascularized flaps that occupy dead space and provide structural support, which can be harvested readily with the robot. Sigmoid epiploica are an excellent flap for pelvic reconstruction. Gracilis flaps and fascia lata grafts are well-tolerated and provide space occupying tissue. Boari flaps aid in robotic ureteral reconstruction, especially in the setting of long defects. Oral mucosa is excellent for ureteral or bladder neck reconstruction. Rectal mucosa is well-tolerated and easy to harvest robotically for a variety of urinary tract reconstructive applications. The appendix or ileum can be interposed for repair of damaged ureters. Conclusions Various flaps and grafts have been adapted for robotic reconstructive urology. As the field develops, refinement of techniques and innovation in flaps and employment of the robot will propel this field forward. More studies, especially comparative studies, are needed to elucidate the flaps and grafts that are most likely to be successful with the least morbidity for each use case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M. Doersch
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Laena Hines
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Divya Ajay
- Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janes WI, Johnston PH. A population-based analysis of the epidemiology of penile cancer in Newfoundland and Labrador. Can Urol Assoc J 2024; 18:E12-E18. [PMID: 37812793 PMCID: PMC10766332 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Penile cancers are a rare subset of carcinomas accounting for <1% of all diagnosed malignancies. There have been recent reports of increasing incidence globally; however, there is limited Canadian literature pertaining to these neoplasms. The province of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL ) represents an important entity to study, possessing the highest national incidence of cancer, along with a plethora of relevant risk factors for penile cancer. METHODS A retrospective chart analysis of all patients with a diagnosis of penile cancer in NL between the years of 2006 and 2018 was conducted. The main outcomes included overall incidence, proportion with metastatic disease, tumor demographics, and overall survival (OS ). Incidence among the male population was calculated using Statistics Canada annual reports. RESULTS An identified 81 cases satisfied the inclusion criteria, with a median age at diagnosis of 65 (interquartile range 20) years. Crude incidence of penile cancer ranged from 1.20-4.27/100 000 males in 2007 and 2010, respectively, while the average age-standardized incidence was 2.34/100 000 males across the study timeframe. Metastatic disease was noted in 17 (21.0%) patients, with a five-year OS of 74% for all penile malignancies, decreasing to 66% in those with invasive squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of penile cancer in our population was higher than reported Western jurisdictions and showed frequent rates of metastatic spread. These observations are likely multifactorial, resultant of chronic inflammation paired with high rates of modifiable risk factors and diagnostic delays. An evident need for greater examination and improved reporting of these malignancies in the province was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W.C. Ian Janes
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Paul H. Johnston
- Division of Urology, Health Sciences Centre, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 83:548-560. [PMID: 36906413 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Penile cancer is a rare disease but has a significant impact on quality of life. Its incidence is increasing, so it is important to include new and relevant evidence in clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE To provide a collaborative guideline that offers worldwide physician and patient guidance for the management of penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Comprehensive literature searches were performed for each section topic. In addition, three systematic reviews were conducted. Levels of evidence were assessed, and a strength rating for each recommendation was assigned according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Penile cancer is a rare disease but its global incidence is increasing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main risk factor for penile cancer and pathology should include an assessment of HPV status. The main aim of primary tumour treatment is complete tumour eradication, which has to be balanced against optimal organ preservation without compromising oncological control. Early detection and treatment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is the main determinant of survival. Surgical LN staging with sentinel node biopsy is recommended for patients with a high-risk (≥pT1b) tumour with cN0 status. While (inguinal) LN dissection remains the standard for node-positive disease, multimodal treatment is needed in patients with advanced disease. Owing to a lack of controlled trials and large series, the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are low in comparison to those for more common diseases. CONCLUSIONS This collaborative penile cancer guideline provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer for use in clinical practice. Organ-preserving surgery should be offered for treatment of the primary tumour when feasible. Adequate and timely LN management remains a challenge, especially in advanced disease stages. Referral to centres of expertise is recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY Penile cancer is a rare disease that significantly impacts quality of life. While the disease can be cured in most cases without lymph node involvement, management of advanced disease remains challenging. Many unmet needs and unanswered questions remain, underlining the importance of research collaborations and centralisation of penile cancer services.
Collapse
|
5
|
The role of surgery for loco-regional and advanced urological cancers. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:634-642. [PMID: 36101519 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There is a general misconception that surgery is the antithesis of palliation. However, symptom mitigation, the basic tenet of palliative interventions, can be achieved by invasive procedures. Surgical care, thus, plays an important role in palliative oncology, alongside radiation and systemic therapy. There is global movement to improve palliation in oncology, and thus it is timely to evaluate the role of surgical interventions can play in this setting. RECENT FINDINGS Many of the surgical interventions done with palliative intent were first established as curative options. Most studies looked at interventions for local control of primary tumour including extirpative surgeries, while some studies studied pain relief for bone metastases. Results show that patients have an acceptable survival outcome and complication rate comparable to those done in the curative setting. However, not all studies report functional outcomes and symptom-relief consistently, highlighting an unmet need. SUMMARY More studies are needed to further define the role of surgery in palliative care. Randomized controlled trials studying surgical intervention in the palliative setting will be challenging because of lack of equipoise, inherent bias in patient and disease characteristics in those who undergo surgery. Nonetheless, studies should endeavour to study symptom-free survival and PROMs as meaningful endpoints of interventions performed in a palliative setting rather than solely focus on hard oncological endpoints of survival.
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy of Applying Kanglaite Injection under Incentive Nursing Intervention in Treating Patients with Advanced Penile Carcinoma and Its Effect on Treatment Compliance. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2021; 2021:4114658. [PMID: 34733339 PMCID: PMC8560245 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4114658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore the efficacy of applying Kanglaite (KLT) injection under incentive nursing intervention (INI) in treating patients with advanced penile carcinoma and its effect on patient treatment compliance. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients with advanced penile carcinoma treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from February 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were equally divided into the experimental group (n = 60) and control group (n = 60) according to their admission order. All patients received the KLT injection treatment; those in the control group accepted the conventional nursing; and on this basis, those in the experimental group accepted INI, including psychological nursing intervention, which was conducted concurrently with the treatment, to compare their short-term efficacy, treatment compliance, degree of cancer-related fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory), and negative emotion scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the experimental group presented a significantly higher objective remission rate (58.3%) (P < 0.05), higher rates of excellent and good treatment compliance (P < 0.05), and lower degree of cancer-related fatigue and negative emotion scores (P < 0.001). Conclusion INI can improve the negative emotions in patients with advanced carcinoma of the penis, alleviate their degree of cancer-related fatigue, promote their treatment compliance, and achieve a more significant efficacy of applying the KLT injection treatment, so it should be promoted in practice.
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomas A, Necchi A, Muneer A, Tobias-Machado M, Tran ATH, Van Rompuy AS, Spiess PE, Albersen M. Penile cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7:11. [PMID: 33574340 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-021-00246-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare cancer with orphan disease designation and a prevalence of 0.1-1 per 100,000 men in high-income countries, but it constitutes up to 10% of malignancies in men in some African, Asian and South American regions. Risk factors for PSCC include the absence of childhood circumcision, phimosis, chronic inflammation, poor penile hygiene, smoking, immunosuppression and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Several different subtypes of HPV-related and non-HPV-related penile cancers have been described, which also have different prognostic profiles. Localized disease can be effectively managed by topical therapy, surgery or radiotherapy. As PSCC is characterized by early lymphatic spread and imaging is inadequate for the detection of micrometastatic disease, correct and upfront surgical staging of the inguinal lymph nodes is crucial in disease management. Advanced stages of disease require multimodal management. Optimal sequencing of treatments and patient selection are still being investigated. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of systemic therapy for advanced PSCC, but they have poor and non-durable responses and high rates of toxic effects, indicating a need for the development of more effective and less toxic therapeutic options. Localized and advanced penile cancers and their treatment have profound physical and psychosexual effects on the quality of life of patients and survivors by altering sexual and urinary function and causing lymphoedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Thomas
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Asif Muneer
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marcos Tobias-Machado
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, ABC Medical School, Instituto do Cancer Vieira de Carvalho, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Anna Thi Huyen Tran
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cakir OO, Castiglione F, Tandogdu Z, Collins J, Alnajjar HM, Akers C, Albersen M, Alifrangis C, Ayres B, Brouwer O, Cullen I, Hawkey P, Jakobsen JK, Johansen TEB, Kalejaiye O, Kaul A, Köves B, Kumar V, Mancini M, Mitra AV, Parnham A, Pozzi E, Protzel C, Sangar VK, Wagenlehner F, Muneer A. Management of penile cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: An eUROGEN accelerated Delphi consensus study. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:197.e9-197.e17. [PMID: 33397593 PMCID: PMC7831701 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To develop an international consensus on managing penile cancer patients during the COVID-19 acute waves. A major concern for patients with penile cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is how the enforced safety measures will affect their disease management. Delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation may have an impact on the extent of the primary lesion as well as the cancer-specific survival because of the development and progression of inguinal lymph node metastases. Materials and methods A review of the COVID-19 literature was conducted in conjunction with analysis of current international guidelines on the management of penile cancer. Results were presented to an international panel of experts on penile cancer and infection control by a virtual accelerated Delphi process using 4 survey rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as an agreement of ≥80%, which was used to reconfigure management pathways for penile cancer. Results Limited evidence is available for delaying penile cancer management. The consensus rate of agreement was 100% that penile cancer pathways should be reconfigured, and measures should be developed to prevent perioperative nosocomial transmission of COVID-19. The panel also reached a consensus on several statements aimed at reconfiguring the management of penile cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions The international consensus panel proposed a framework for the diagnostic and invasive therapeutic procedures for penile cancer within a low-risk environment for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Onur Cakir
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Fabio Castiglione
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Zafer Tandogdu
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Collins
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Hussain M Alnajjar
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Akers
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Constantine Alifrangis
- Department of Medical Oncology St Bartholomews Hospital, London, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar Brouwer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Ivor Cullen
- National Cancer Control Programme, University Hospital Waterford, Ireland
| | - Peter Hawkey
- Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Truls Erik Bjerklund Johansen
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Odunayo Kalejaiye
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Asheesh Kaul
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Bela Köves
- Department of Urology, South Pest Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Vivekanandan Kumar
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anita Vanessa Mitra
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arie Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Edoardo Pozzi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Chris Protzel
- Department of Urology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin Medical School MSH, Germany
| | - Vijay K Sangar
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Asif Muneer
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmed ME, Khalil MI, Kamel MH, Karnes RJ, Spiess PE. Progress on Management of Penile Cancer in 2020. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 22:4. [PMID: 33230601 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00802-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Management of penile cancer represents a challenge to urologic oncologists due to the disease's rarity and sparse data in the literature. Squamous cell carcinoma represents the most common histologic subtype of penile cancer. Penile cancer has a disastrous effect on patients' psychological and physical health. Penile cancer accounts for approximately 1% of cancer deaths in the USA annually. However, in recent years, the management of penile cancer has achieved marked progress in both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches with the intent to avoid radical surgeries. The traditional total penile amputation has been replaced by penile preserving procedures in many patients. Nowadays, total penile amputation (total penectomy) is preserved only for patients with proximal lesions. The introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the management of penile cancer-infiltrated lymph nodes has been reported. Given the dismal prognosis with conventional cytotoxic therapies, new systemic therapies have been investigated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile cancer. Multiple studies have shown promising outcomes. All these efforts have resulted in a remarkable improvement in patient quality of life. The objectives of our review are to update clinicians on the advances in the management of penile cancer and to summarize the recent guidelines and recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mahmoud I Khalil
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Mohamed H Kamel
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genito-Urinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of GU Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Urology and Oncology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Krishna S, Shanbhogue K, Schieda N, Morbeck F, Hadas B, Kulkarni G, McInnes MD, Baroni RH. Role of MRI in Staging of Penile Cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51:1612-1629. [PMID: 31976600 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Penile cancer is one of the male-specific cancers. Accurate pretreatment staging is crucial due to a plethora of treatment options currently available. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer-Tumor Node and Metastasis (AJCC-TNM) revised the staging for penile cancers, with invasion of corpora cavernosa upstaged from T2 to T3 and invasion of urethra downstaged from T3 to being not separately relevant. With this revision, MRI is more relevant in local staging because MRI is accurate in identifying invasion of corpora cavernosa, while the accuracy is lower for detection of urethral involvement. The recent European Urology Association (EAU) guidelines recommend MRI to exclude invasion of the corpora cavernosa, especially if penis preservation is planned. Identification of satellite lesions and measurement of residual-penile-length help in surgical planning. When nonsurgical treatment modalities of the primary tumor are being considered, accurate local staging helps in decision-making regarding upfront inguinal lymph node dissection as against surveillance. MRI helps in detection and extent of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy and is superior to clinical palpation, which continues to be the current approach recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines. MRI helps the detection of "bulky" lymph nodes that warrant neoadjuvant chemotherapy and potentially identify extranodal extension. However, tumor involvement in small lymph nodes and differentiation of reactive vs. malignant lymphadenopathy in large lymph nodes continue to be challenging and the utilization of alternative contrast agents (superparamagnetic iron oxide), positron emission tomography (PET)-MRI along with texture analysis is promising. In locally recurrent tumors, MRI is invaluable in identification of deep invasion, which forms the basis of treatment. Multiparametric MRI, especially diffusion-weighted-imaging, may allow for quantitative noninvasive assessment of tumor grade and histologic subtyping to avoid biopsy undersampling. Further research is required for incorporation of MRI with deep learning and artificial intelligence algorithms for effective staging in penile cancer. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1612-1629.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satheesh Krishna
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Krishna Shanbhogue
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fernando Morbeck
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sao Paulo, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Benhabib Hadas
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish Kulkarni
- Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew D McInnes
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sao Paulo, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare condition and can be very complex to manage. Advances in surgical techniques, imaging, pathological classification and patient pathways have led to improved patient care. The diagnosis of pre-malignant change, penile cancer and metastatic disease along with advances in their treatment are detailed in this review which aims to update clinicians from multiple specialties and countries on penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian J Johnston
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Institute of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|