Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)-strategy for colorectal liver metastases

Correlation between the liver transection line localization and future liver remnant hypertrophy in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy

Background and aims

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) represent the most prevalent form of secondary liver tumors, and insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) often leads to unresectability. To tackle this challenge, various methods for stimulating liver hypertrophy have been developed including portal vein embolization (PVE), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and the newest one, liver venous deprivation (LVD). ALPPS was thoroughly studied over the last decade and it has been shown to induce rapid and intensive FLR hypertrophy. The objective of this study was to assess whether the localization of the liver transection line during the initial stage of ALPPS correlates with the degree of FLR hypertrophy.

Methods

A retrospective, multicentric study was conducted, and we analyzed all consecutive patients with CRLMs who underwent ALPPS over the eight-year period. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of resection-right trisectionectomy (ERH) or right hemihepatectomy (RH) respectively. The degree of hypertrophy (DH), its correlation with FLR and postoperative outcomes were assessed.

Results

The cohort consisted of 136 patients (72 in the ERH group and 64 in the RH group). Baseline characteristics, hypertrophy interval, and total liver volume showed no significant differences between the groups. DH was greater in the ERH group (83.2% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.025). A strong negative correlation was observed between FLR volume and DH in both groups. Postoperative outcomes and one-year survival were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions

FLR hypertrophy is influenced by the localization of the liver transection line in ALPPS. Furthermore, correlation analysis indicated that a smaller estimated FLR is associated with greater DH. No statistical difference in outcomes was noted between the groups.

Postoperative Liver Failure: Definitions, Risk factors, Prediction Models and Prevention Strategies

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is the treatment for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Despite advances in preoperative selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following liver resection.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases in May of 2023. The MESH terms "liver failure," "liver insufficiency," and "hepatic failure" in combination with "liver surgery," "liver resection," and "hepatectomy" were searched in the title and/or abstract. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional eligible publications.

RESULTS

PHLF can have devastating physiological consequences. In general, risk factors can be categorized as patient-related, primary liver function-related, or perioperative factors. Currently, no effective treatment options are available and the management of PHLF is largely supportive. Therefore, identifying risk factors and preventative strategies for PHLF is paramount. Ensuring an adequate future liver remnant is important to mitigate risk of PHLF. Dynamic liver function tests provide more objective assessment of liver function based on the metabolic capacity of the liver and have the advantage of easy administration, low cost, and easy reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

Given the absence of randomized data specifically related to the management of PHLF, current strategies are based on the principles of management of acute liver failure from any cause. In addition, goal-directed therapy for organ dysfunction, as well as identification and treatment of reversible factors in the postoperative period are critical.

The role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in the management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) approach emerged as a promising surgical strategy for rapid and large hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) when a major liver resection is necessary. Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is their main indication. However, the promising results published so far, are very difficult to interpret since they usually focus on the technique and not on the underlying disease. Moreover, they are usually made up of complex populations, which received different chemotherapy schemes, with the ALPPS technical variations implemented over time and without consistent long-term follow-up results as well. Whereby, its role in CRLM should be analyzed as carefully as possible to indicate and select the best candidates who will benefit the most from this approach. We conducted a computerized search using PubMed and Google Scholar for reports published so far, using mesh headings and keywords related to the ALPPS and CRLM.

Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization: an ACS-NSQIP Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is utilized to induce growth of the future liver remnant volume (FLRV) among patients at elevated risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).

METHODS

The American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to compare short-term outcomes of PVE versus non-PVE patients. A propensity score match (PSM) was used to compare short-term outcomes among PVE and non-PVE patients.

RESULTS

Among the 11,243 patients included in the study, 462 (4.1%) patients had a PVE. Postoperatively, patients who underwent PVE had a higher incidence of overall (PVE, 44% vs. non-PVE, 23%) and liver-specific complications (biliary leak PVE, 16% vs. non-PVE, 7%; post-hepatectomy liver failure [PHLF] PVE, 17% vs. non-PVE, 5%), as well as a longer length of stay (> 7 days PVE, 39% vs. non-PVE, 22%) compared with the non-PVE group (all p < 0.001). After PSM, no differences in mortality or LOS were observed among PVE and non-PVE patients. PVE patients remained more likely to have a bile leak, organ/surgical-site infection, and PHLF versus non-PVE patients (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among patients who underwent PVE before hepatectomy, the risk of postoperative complications was 1.6-fold higher than non-PVE patients. After PSM, PVE patients still had an increased risk of complications.

Historical perspective: Two decades of progress in treating metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. While screening methods strive to improve rates of early stage detection, 25% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, with the most common sites being the liver, lung, and peritoneum. While once perceived as hopeless, the last two decades have seen substantial strides in the medical, surgical, and regional therapies to treat metastatic disease offering significant improvements in survival.