1
|
Chen QY, Zhong Q, Liu ZY, Li P, Lin GT, Zheng QL, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Zeng GR, Jiang MC, Wang HG, Huang XB, Xu KX, Li YF, Zheng CH, Xie JW, Huang CM. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided versus conventional laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: long-term outcomes of a phase 3 randomised clinical trial. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7413. [PMID: 37973806 PMCID: PMC10654517 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42712-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging-guided lymphadenectomy has been demonstrated to be effective in increasing the number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). Previously, we reported the primary outcomes and short-term secondary outcomes of a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (NCT03050879) investigating the use of ICG for image-guided lymphadenectomy in patients with potentially resectable GC. Patients were randomly (1:1 ratio) assigned to either the ICG or non-ICG group. The primary outcome was the number of LNs retrieved and has been reported. Here, we report the primary outcome and long-term secondary outcomes including three-year overall survival (OS), three-year disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns. The per-protocol analysis set population is used for all analyses (258 patients, ICG [n = 129] vs. non-ICG group [n = 129]). The mean total LNs retrieved in the ICG group significantly exceeds that in the non-ICG group (50.5 ± 15.9 vs 42.0 ± 10.3, P < 0.001). Both OS and DFS in the ICG group are significantly better than that in the non-ICG group (log-rank P = 0.015; log-rank P = 0.012, respectively). There is a difference in the overall recurrence rates between the ICG and non-ICG groups (17.8% vs 31.0%). Compared with conventional lymphadenectomy, ICG guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy is safe and effective in prolonging survival among patients with resectable GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhong
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Guang-Tan Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiao-Ling Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Long-Long Cao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mi Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ru-Hong Tu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ze-Ning Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Gui-Rong Zeng
- Diagnostic Pathology Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mei-Chen Jiang
- Department of Pathology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hua-Gen Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Bo Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Kai-Xiang Xu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Fan Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dinescu VC, Gheorman V, Georgescu EF, Paitici Ș, Bică M, Pătrașcu Ș, Bunescu MG, Popa R, Berceanu MC, Pătrașcu AM, Gheorman LM, Dinescu SN, Udriștoiu I, Gheorman V, Forțofoiu MC, Cojan TȘȚ. Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1769. [PMID: 37629625 PMCID: PMC10455758 DOI: 10.3390/life13081769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach-D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence by conducting a comprehensive literature review and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. The analysis includes studies, clinical trials, and systematic reviews that assess survival outcomes, morbidity, and quality of life. The selected studies revealed different outcomes associated with D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy, including lymph node harvest, disease control, recurrence rates, and overall survival. Postoperative complications also varied between the two techniques. These findings highlight the complex considerations involved in selecting the most suitable lymphadenectomy approach for individual patients. Therefore, the decision requires an individualized assessment that considers the potential benefits and risks of D1 and D2 techniques. A collaborative approach involving interdisciplinary teams is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans that optimize both oncological outcomes and postoperative quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venera-Cristina Dinescu
- Department of Health Promotion and Occupational Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Veronica Gheorman
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Eugen Florin Georgescu
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Ștefan Paitici
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Marius Bică
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Ștefan Pătrașcu
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Marius Gabriel Bunescu
- Occupational Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Romeo Popa
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Mihaela Corina Berceanu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Ana Maria Pătrașcu
- Hematology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Lavinia Maria Gheorman
- Department of Diabetology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Sorin Nicolae Dinescu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Ion Udriștoiu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (I.U.); (V.G.)
| | - Victor Gheorman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (I.U.); (V.G.)
| | - Mircea Cătălin Forțofoiu
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Filantropia Hospital of Craiova, 200143 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Tiberiu-Ștefăniță Țenea Cojan
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marano L, Carbone L, Poto GE, Restaino V, Piccioni SA, Verre L, Roviello F, Marrelli D. Extended Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Era: Current Status, Clinical Implications and Contentious Issues. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:875-896. [PMID: 36661716 PMCID: PMC9858164 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite its decreasing incidence, gastric cancer remains an important global healthcare problem due to its overall high prevalence and high mortality rate. Since the MAGIC and FNLCC/FFCD trials, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been recommended throughout Europe in gastric cancer. Potential benefits of preoperative treatments include a higher rate of R0 resection achieved by downstaging the primary tumor, a likely effect on micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the lymph nodes, and, as a result, improved cancer-related survival. Nevertheless, distortion of anatomical planes of dissection, interstitial fibrosis, and sclerotic tissue changes may increase surgical difficulty. The collection of at least twenty-five lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy would seem to ensure removal of undetectable node metastasis and reduce the likelihood of locoregional recurrence. It is not what you take but what you leave behind that defines survival. Therefore, para-aortic lymph node dissection is safe and effective after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in both therapeutic and prophylactic settings. In this review, the efficacy of adequate lymph node dissection, also in a neoadjuvant setting, has been investigated in the key studies conducted to date on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ludovico Carbone
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dong B, Zhang A, Zhang Y, Ye W, Liao L, Li Z. Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided lymphadenectomy in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:998159. [PMID: 36330471 PMCID: PMC9623049 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.998159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Indocyanine green (ICG) imaging-guided lymphadenectomy has been introduced in gastric cancer (GC) surgery and its clinical value remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ICG fluorescence imaging-guided lymphadenectomy in radical gastrectomy for GC. Methods Studies comparing lymphadenectomy in radical gastrectomy between use and non-use of ICG fluorescence imaging up to July 2022 were systematically searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library. A pooled analysis was performed for the available data regarding the baseline features, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), the number of metastatic LNs and surgical outcomes as well as oncological outcomes. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Quality evaluation and publication bias were also conducted. Results 17 studies with a total of 2274 patients (1186 in the ICG group and 1088 in the control group) undergoing radical gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy were included. In the pooled analysis, the baseline features were basically comparable. However, the number of retrieved LNs in the ICG group was significantly more than that in the control group (MD = 7.41, 95% CI = 5.44 to 9.37, P < 0.00001). No significant difference was found between the ICG and control groups in terms of metastatic LNs (MD = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.25 to 0.16, P = 0.65). In addition, the use of ICG could reduce intraoperative blood loss (MD = -17.96, 95% CI = -27.89 to -8.04, P = 0.0004) without increasing operative time (P = 0.14) and overall complications (P = 0.10). In terms of oncological outcomes, the use of ICG could reduce the overall recurrence rate (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.89; P = 0.02) but could not increase the 2-year overall survival rate (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 0.72-2.18; P = 0.43). Conclusions ICG imaging-guided lymphadenectomy is valuable for complete LNs dissection in radical gastrectomy for GC. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Dong
- Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China
| | - Anyuan Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuqiang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Ye
- Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China
| | - Lan Liao
- Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China
| | - Zonglin Li
- Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Zonglin Li,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ambrosio MR, Perotti B, Battini A, Fattorini C, Cavazzana A, Pasqua R, Palumbo P, Gia L, Arganini M. Surgeon-Pathologist Team Approach Dramatically Affects Lymph Nodes Detection and Improves Patients' Short-Term Outcome. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041034. [PMID: 35205783 PMCID: PMC8870551 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Appropriate lymph node harvesting for patients with gastric cancer is fundamental for a correct staging and is strongly related to survival. In this study, we present a new protocol for on-site macroscopic evaluation and sampling of lymph nodes for gastric cancer patients. With the joint collaboration of surgeons and pathologists, our method aims to provide the largest possible number of analyzed lymph nodes per patient, allowing for a better staging. We are convinced that this approach is routinely feasible, and our preliminary results seem to confirm better patient stratification compared to other lymph node dissection methods. Abstract The downstaging of gastric cancer has recently gained particular attention in the field of gastric cancer surgery. The phenomenon is mainly due to an inappropriate sampling of lymph nodes during standard lymphadenectomy. Hence, collection of the maximum number of lymph nodes is a critical factor affecting the outcome of patients. None of the techniques proposed so far have demonstrated a real efficiency in increasing the number of identified lymph nodes. To harvest the maximum number of lymph nodes, we designed a protocol for on-site macroscopic evaluation and sampling of lymph nodes according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association protocol. The procedure was carried out by a surgeon/pathologist team in the operating room. We enrolled one hundred patients, 50 of whom belonged to the study group and 50 to a control group. The study group included patients who underwent lymph node dissection following the proposed protocol; the control group encompassed patients undergoing standard procedures for sampling. We compared the number and maximum diameter of lymph nodes collected in both groups, as well as some postoperative variables, the 30-day mortality and the overall survival. In the study group, the mean number of lymph nodes harvested was higher than the control one (p = 0.001). Moreover, by applying the proposed technique, we sampled lymph nodes with a very small diameter, some of which were metastatic. Noticeably, no difference in terms of postoperative course was identified between the two groups, again supporting the feasibility of an extended lymphadenectomy. By comparing the prognosis of patients, a better overall survival (p = 0.03) was detected in the study group; however, to date, no long-term follow-up is available. Interestingly, patients with metastasis in node stations number 8, 9, 11 or with skip metastasis, experienced a worse outcome and died. Based on our preliminary results, the pathologist/surgeon team approach seems to be a reliable option, despite of a slight increase in sfaff workload and technical cost. It allows for the harvesting of a larger number of lymph nodes and improves the outcome of the patients thanks to more precise staging and therapy. Nevertheless, since a higher number of patients are necessary to confirm our findings and assess the impact of this technique on oncological outcome, our study could serve as a proof-of-concept for a larger, multicentric collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Raffaella Ambrosio
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord-Ovest, Via Cocchi 1, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (C.F.); (A.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Bruno Perotti
- Surgery Unit, Ospedale Unico Versilia and Nuovo Ospedale Apuane, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord Ovest, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (B.P.); (A.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.)
| | - Alda Battini
- Surgery Unit, Ospedale Unico Versilia and Nuovo Ospedale Apuane, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord Ovest, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (B.P.); (A.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.)
| | - Caterina Fattorini
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord-Ovest, Via Cocchi 1, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (C.F.); (A.C.)
| | - Andrea Cavazzana
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord-Ovest, Via Cocchi 1, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (C.F.); (A.C.)
| | - Rocco Pasqua
- Department of Surgical Sciencies, University “La Sapienza”, 00100 Roma, Italy; (R.P.); (P.P.)
| | - Piergaspare Palumbo
- Department of Surgical Sciencies, University “La Sapienza”, 00100 Roma, Italy; (R.P.); (P.P.)
| | - Liano Gia
- Surgery Unit, Ospedale Unico Versilia and Nuovo Ospedale Apuane, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord Ovest, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (B.P.); (A.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.)
| | - Marco Arganini
- Surgery Unit, Ospedale Unico Versilia and Nuovo Ospedale Apuane, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Nord Ovest, 56121 Pisa, Italy; (B.P.); (A.B.); (L.G.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sukhbaatar A, Mori S, Kodama T. Intranodal delivery of modified docetaxel: Innovative therapeutic method to inhibit tumor cell growth in lymph nodes. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:1125-1139. [PMID: 35100484 PMCID: PMC8990862 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Delivery of chemotherapeutic agents into metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) is challenging as they are unevenly distributed in the body. They are difficult to access via traditional systemic routes of drug administration, which produce significant adverse effects and result in low accumulation of drugs into the cancerous LN. To improve the survival rate of patients with LN metastasis, a lymphatic drug delivery system (LDDS) has been developed to target metastatic LN by delivering chemotherapy agents into sentinel LN (SLN) under ultrasound guidance. The LDDS is an advanced method that can be applied in the early stage of the progression of tumor cells in the SLN before tumor mass formation has occurred. Here we investigated the optimal physicochemical ranges of chemotherapeutic agents’ solvents with the aim of increasing treatment efficacy using the LDDS. We found that an appropriate osmotic pressure range for drug administration was 700–3,000 kPa, with a viscosity < 40 mPa⋅s. In these physicochemical ranges, expansion of lymphatic vessels and sinuses, drug retention, and subsequent antitumor effects could be more precisely controlled. Furthermore, the antitumor effects depended on the tumor progression stage in the SLN, the injection rate, and the volumes of administered drugs. We anticipate these optimal ranges to be a starting point for developing more effective drug regimens to treat metastatic LN with the LDDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariunbuyan Sukhbaatar
- Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.,Biomedical Engineering Cancer Research Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Shiro Mori
- Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.,Biomedical Engineering Cancer Research Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Kodama
- Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering for Cancer, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.,Biomedical Engineering Cancer Research Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.,Department of Electronic Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 980-8579, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhong Q, Chen QY, Huang XB, Lin GT, Liu ZY, Chen JY, Wang HG, Weng K, Li P, Xie JW, Lin JX, Lu J, Lin M, Huang ZN, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Clinical implications of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-Guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer: A cohort study from two randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. Int J Surg 2021; 94:106120. [PMID: 34543741 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in tracing metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) has rarely been reported. We aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of fluorescence imaging-guided lymphadenectomy and the sensitivity of fluorescent lymphography to detect metastatic LN stations in gastric cancer (GC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This analysis pooled data from two randomized controlled trials (FUGES-012 and FUGES-019 studies) on laparoscopic ICG tracer-guided lymphadenectomy for GC between November 2018 and October 2020. Patients who received ICG injection using either the intraoperative subserosal or preoperative submucosal approaches 1 day before surgery and underwent fluorescence imaging-guided lymphadenectomy were defined as the ICG group. Patients who underwent conventional lymphadenectomy without ICG injection and intraoperative imaging were defined as the non-ICG group. RESULTS Among 514 enrolled patients, the ICG and non-ICG groups included 385 and 129, respectively. A significantly higher mean number of LNs was retrieved in the ICG group than in the non-ICG group (49.9 vs. 42.0, P < 0.001). The ICG group showed a lower LN noncompliance rate than that in the non-ICG group (31.9% vs. 57.4%, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of fluorescence imaging for detecting all metastatic LN stations was 86.8%. The negative predictive value was 92.2% for nonfluorescent stations. For detecting all metastatic stations, subgroup analysis revealed 97.7%, 91.7%, 86.2%, and 84.3% sensitivities for pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4a tumors, respectively. Regardless of gastrectomy type, the diagnostic accuracy for detecting all metastatic stations in the D1+ and D2 stations for cT1-cT2 disease reached 100%. CONCLUSION ICG fluorescence imaging, using either the subserosal or submucosal approaches, assisted in the thorough dissection of potentially metastatic LNs, as recommended for individualized laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhong
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Cancer (Fujian Medical University), Ministry of Education, Fuzhou, China Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Ozmen F, Moran M, Ozalp N, Seckin S. D2 vs D2 Plus Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Gastric Cancer. Turk J Surg 2021; 37:49-58. [PMID: 34585094 DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Gastric cancer is a common malignancy worldwide. Effective treatment by interdisciplinary cooperation is important, and surgery still plays an important role. Material and Methods In a ten-year period, 355 patients were diagnosed to have gastric cancer. One hundred and sixty-two patients with a median (range) age of 58 (23-83) years were eligible for the study. There were 107 patients in D2 and 55 patients in D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection group. The two groups were compared in terms of complications, morbidity, mortality and long-term survival. Results Length of stay was 12 (8-34) days for D2 and 14 (8-42) days for D2 plus PALND. Total number of operative mortality was 8/162 (5%), and it was not different between the groups. Twenty patients (18%) had complications in D2 group and 9 (17%) patients in D2 plus PALND group. Overall survival was also similar between the groups, but patients with T3-T4 tumors, patients with stage IIIA and IIIB disease had better survival with D2 plus PALN dissection. We found that the depth of invasion, PLN, ratio (PLN/TLN), stage and LND were all prognostic variables. Conclusion This study showed that D2 plus PALN dissection for advanced gastric cancer can be performed as safely as a standard D2 dissection by experienced surgeons without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. D2 plus PALN dissection should be preferred in the advanced stage of the disease (IIIA-IIIB) as it increases the rate of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Mahir Ozmen
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.,General Surgery, Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.,General Surgery, Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Baris Zulfikaroglu
- General Surgery, Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fusun Ozmen
- Department of Basic Oncology, Cancer Institute, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.,Medical Oncology, Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Munevver Moran
- General Surgery, Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.,General Surgery, Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Necdet Ozalp
- General Surgery, Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selda Seckin
- Pathology, Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ambrosio MR, Perotti B, Cavazzana A, Arganini M. How surgeon and pathologist cooperation may drive toward a more efficient nodes harvesting in gastric cancer surgery. Updates Surg 2021; 73:2025-2028. [PMID: 33961278 PMCID: PMC8102146 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01030-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruno Perotti
- Surgery Unit, Ospedale Unico Versilia, Azienda Ospedaliera Toscana Nord Ovest, Via Aurelia n. 335, 55049, Lido di Camaiore, Italy
| | - Andrea Cavazzana
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Arganini
- Surgery Unit, Ospedale Unico Versilia, Azienda Ospedaliera Toscana Nord Ovest, Via Aurelia n. 335, 55049, Lido di Camaiore, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|