A narrative review on tumor microenvironment in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer: a lot remains to be done

Characterizing the immune tumor microenvironment in ALK fusion-positive lung cancer: state-of-the-art and therapeutical implications

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exhibits anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. EML4-ALK fusions account for over 90% of ALK rearrangements in NSCLC. The advent of treatment targeting ALK has significantly improved survival rates in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. However, the emergence of resistance mechanisms and the subsequent progression disease inevitably occurs. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a pivotal role in lung cancer, influencing disease development, patient's outcomes, and response to treatments.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive characterization of the TIME in ALK rearranged NSCLC and its intrinsic plasticity under treatment pressure.

EXPERT OPINION

Recognizing the fundamental role of the TIME in cancer progression has shifted the paradigm from a tumor cell-centric perspective to the understanding of a complex tumor ecosystem. Understanding the intricate dynamics of the TIME, its influence on treatment response, and the potential of immunotherapy in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC are currently among the primary research objectives in this patient population.

KEAP1-Mutant Lung Cancers Weaken Anti-Tumor Immunity and Promote an M2-like Macrophage Phenotype

Considerable advances have been made in lung cancer therapies, but there is still an unmet clinical need to improve survival for lung cancer patients. Immunotherapies have improved survival, although only 20-30% of patients respond to these treatments. Interestingly, cancers with mutations in Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), the negative regulator of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) transcription factor, are resistant to immune checkpoint inhibition and correlate with decreased lymphoid cell infiltration. NRF2 is known for promoting an anti-inflammatory phenotype when activated in immune cells, but the study of NRF2 activation in cancer cells has not been adequately assessed. The objective of this study was to determine how lung cancer cells with constitutive NRF2 activity interact with the immune microenvironment to promote cancer progression. To assess, we generated CRISPR-edited mouse lung cancer cell lines by knocking out the KEAP1 or NFE2L2 genes and utilized a publicly available single-cell dataset through the Gene Expression Omnibus to investigate tumor/immune cell interactions. We show here that KEAP1-mutant cancers promote immunosuppression of the tumor microenvironment. Our data suggest KEAP1 deletion is sufficient to alter the secretion of cytokines, increase expression of immune checkpoint markers on cancer cells, and alter recruitment and differential polarization of immunosuppressive macrophages that ultimately lead to T-cell suppression.

Measured Steps: Navigating the Path of Oligoprogressive Lung Cancer with Targeted and Immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses the definitions, treatment modalities, management, future directions, and ongoing clinical trials of oligoprogressive disease in oncogene-driven and non-oncogene-driven NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last decades, diagnostic and treatment modalities for oligometastatic NSCLC have advanced significantly, leading to improved survival. Additionally, our understanding of the tumor biology of oligoprogressive disease has expanded. However, despite the efforts of organizations, such as EORTC, ESTRO, and ASTRO proposing definitions for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, heterogeneity in definitions persists in (ongoing) trials. Recognizing the significance of subclassification within oligoprogressive disease in NSCLC and the varying risks associated with subsequent metastatic spread, there is a call for tailored management strategies. A consensus on standardized criteria for the definition of oligoprogressive disease is urgently needed and will not only facilitate meaningful comparisons between studies but also pave the way for the development of personalized treatment plans that take into account the heterogeneous nature of oligoprogressive disease.

CD47 Expression in Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor Microemboli from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Is a Poor Prognosis Factor

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and/or circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients may be a non-invasive tool for prognosis, acting as liquid biopsy. CTCs interact with platelets through the transforming growth factor-β/transforming growth factor-β receptor type 1 (TGF-β/TGFβRI) forming clusters. CTCs also may express the Cluster of Differentiation 47 (CD47) protein, responsible for the inhibition of phagocytosis, the "don't eat me" signal to macrophages.

OBJECTIVES

To isolate, quantify and analyze CTCs/CTMs from metastatic NSCLC patients, identify TGFβRI/CD47 expression in CTCs/CTMs, and correlate with progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

Blood (10 mL) was collected at two time-points: T1 (before the beginning of any line of treatment; T2 (60 days after initial collection). CTCs were isolated using ISET®. Immunocytochemistry was conducted to evaluate TGFβRI/CD47 expression.

RESULTS

45 patients were evaluated. CTCs were observed in 82.2% of patients at T1 (median: 1 CTC/mL; range: 0.33-11.33 CTCs/mL) and 94.5% at T2 (median: 1.33 CTC/mL; 0.33-9.67). CTMs were observed in 24.5% of patients and significantly associated with poor PFS (10 months vs. 17 months for those without clusters; p = 0.05) and disease progression (p = 0.017). CTMs CD47+ resulted in poor PFS (p = 0.041). TGFβRI expression in CTCs/CTMs was not associated with PFS.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed that CTC/CTM from NSCLC patients express the immune evasion markers TGFβRI/CD47. The presence of CTMs CD47+ is associated with poor PFS. This was the first study to investigate CD47 expression in CTCs/CTM of patients with NSCLC and its association with poor PFS.

Immunotherapeutic targets in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common types of cancer in the world and has a 5-year survival rate of ~20%. Immunotherapies have shown promising results leading to durable responses, however, they are only effective for a subset of patients. To determine the best therapeutic approach, a thorough and in-depth profiling of the tumour microenvironment (TME) is required. The TME is a complex network of cell types that form an interconnected network, promoting tumour cell initiation, growth and dissemination. The stroma, immune cells and endothelial cells that comprise the TME generate a plethora of cytotoxic or cytoprotective signalling pathways. In this review, we discuss immunotherapeutic targets in NSCLC tumours and how the TME may influence patients' response to immunotherapy.

Nanoparticles overcome adaptive immune resistance and enhance immunotherapy via targeting tumor microenvironment in lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the common malignant cancers worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved survival of lung cancer patients. However, ICI therapy leads to adaptive immune resistance and displays resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer, leading to less immune response of lung cancer patients. Tumor microenvironment (TME) is an integral tumor microenvironment, which is involved in immunotherapy resistance. Nanomedicine has been used to enhance the immunotherapy in lung cancer. In this review article, we described the association between TME and immunotherapy in lung cancer. We also highlighted the importance of TME in immunotherapy in lung cancer. Moreover, we discussed how nanoparticles are involved in regulation of TME to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy, including Nanomedicine SGT-53, AZD1080, Nanomodulator NRF2, Cisplatin nanoparticles, Au@PG, DPAICP@ME, SPIO NP@M-P, NBTXR3 nanoparticles, ARAC nanoparticles, Nano-DOX, MS NPs, Nab-paclitaxel, GNPs-hPD-L1 siRNA. Furthermore, we concluded that targeting TME by nanoparticles could be helpful to overcome resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer.

Oligoprogression in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of lung cancers and is the most common non-cutaneous cancer world-wide. In NSCLC, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease (OPD) have been recognized as separate entities within the realm of metastatic disease and are emerging concepts in the context of targeted systemic therapies. Our objectives are to discuss the current literature regarding the evolving definitions of OPD in the context of oligometastatic disease (OMD) for NSCLC. Further, to discuss current and future clinical trials that have shaped our local approach with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods

Literature on OPD in NSCLC and local ablative therapy (LAT) including SBRT/SABR and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was reviewed.

Key Content and Findings

Oligoprogression is defined as limited (usually 3-5) metastatic areas progressing while on/off systemic therapy in the background of oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease. Prognosis in OPD with treatment (such as LAT and systemic therapy) may be more favorable. Outcomes for patients progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with molecular mutations [such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)] who receive LAT are promising.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with NSCLC metastasis with progression at a limited number of sites on/off a given line of systemic therapy may have favorable outcomes with aggressive LAT, which includes SBRT/SABR/SRS. Further studies need to be completed to further optimize treatment recommendations.

18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing heterogeneous metabolic response between primary tumor and metastases and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to use ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and/or computed tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET/CT) imaging to evaluate the heterogeneous metabolic response between primary tumor and metastases in NSCLC after therapy and explored its correlation with prognosis.

METHODS

The data of patients with NSCLC who underwent ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT before and after treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Heterogeneous metabolic response (HR), defined as the difference in metabolic response between any metastases and primary lesion, was evaluated using ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT. And the correlation between HR and clinical prognosis was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients with NSCLC including 56 primary lesions and 491 metastases were enrolled in the study. 46.4% (26/56) of patients had HR, especially in patients with stage IV disease and whose metastases with high metabolic burden. HR was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < .001 and P = .045, respectively). The multivariate analysis suggested that HR was an unfavorable independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 4.36; 95% CI, 2.00-9.49; P < .001) but not for PFS (P = .469). HR between lymph node metastases was correlated with shorter OS (P < .001) but not with PFS (P = .370).

CONCLUSION

HR was observed between primary and metastatic lesions in NSCLC after treatment using PET/CT. HR is significantly associated with poor prognosis and is an independent prognostic factor for OS.

Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Practical Review of Prospective Trials

Simple Summary

A significant number of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will have a metastatic Stage IV disease at presentation. Among those, patients with limited number of metastases are referred to as oligometastatic, and their treatment will combine systemic and possible local therapy. The aim of this article is to review the current definition of oligometastatic cancer, a historic perspective of lung cancer leading to modern oligometastatic disease and to present available prospective evidence for treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. We describe trials exploring role of local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC with actionable mutation in combination with TKI or without any actionable mutation and in combination with chemo-immunotherapy. We also discuss general treatment approaches adopted based on limited data. Finally, we discuss the on-going clinical trials for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC.

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an intermediate state between localized and widely metastatic NSCLC, where systemic therapy in combination with aggressive local therapy when feasible can yield a favorable outcome. While different societies have adopted different definitions for oligometastatic NSCLC, the feasibility of curative intent treatment remains a major determinant of the oligometastatic state. The management involves a multidisciplinary approach to identify such patients with oligometastatic stage, including the presence of symptomatic or potentially symptomatic brain metastasis, the presence of targetable mutations, and programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression. Treatment requires a personalized approach with the use of novel systemic agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, and addition of local ablative therapy via surgery or stereotactic radiation therapy when appropriate.

Patient Selection for Local Aggressive Treatment in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Since the first introduction of the oligometastatic state with a low burden of metastases in non-small cell lung cancer, accumulating evidence from retrospective and prospective studies has shown that a local aggressive, multimodality treatment may significantly improve the prognosis in these patients. Local aggressive treatment includes a systemic therapy of micrometastatic disease, as well as a radical resection of the primary tumor and surgical resection and/or radiation therapy of distant metastases. However, patient selection and treatment allocation remain a central challenge in oligometastatic disease. In this review, we aimed to address the current evidence on criteria for patient selection for local aggressive treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

One-fourth of all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer presents with a limited number of metastases and relatively low systemic tumor burden. This oligometastatic state with limited systemic tumor burden may be associated with remarkably improved overall and progression-free survival if both primary tumor and metastases are treated radically combined with systemic therapy. This local aggressive therapy (LAT) requires a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation therapists, and thoracic surgeons. A surgical resection of the often advanced primary tumor should be part of the radical treatment whenever feasible. However, patient selection, timing, and a correct treatment allocation for LAT appear to be essential. In this review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the current evidence on patient selection criteria such as characteristics of the primary tumor and metastases, response to neoadjuvant or first-line treatment, molecular characteristics, mediastinal lymph node involvement, and other factors for LAT in oligometastatic NSCLC.

Baseline tumour size is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in PD-L1 ≥ 50% non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a PD-L1 tumour proportion score ≥ 50% can be treated with pembrolizumab alone. Our aim was to assess the impact of baseline tumour size (BTS) on overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicentre study included all patients with untreated advanced NSCLC receiving either pembrolizumab (PD-L1 ≥ 50%) or platinum-based chemotherapy (any PD-L1). The primary endpoint was the impact of BTS (defined as the sum of the dimensions of baseline target lesions according to RECIST v1.1 criteria) on OS.

RESULTS

Between 09-2016 and 06-2020, 188 patients were included, 96 in the pembrolizumab (P-group) and 92 in the chemotherapy group (CT-group). The median follow-up was 26.9 months (range 0.13-37.91) and 44.4 months (range 0.23-48.62), respectively, while the median BTS was similar, 85.5 mm (IQR 57.2-113.2) and 86.0 mm (IQR 53.0-108.5), respectively (p = 0.42). The median P-group OS was 18.2 months [95% CI 12.2-not reached (NR)] for BTS > 86 mm versus NR (95% CI 27.2-NR) for BTS ≤ 86 mm (p = 0.0026). A high BTS was associated with a shorter OS in univariate analyses (p = 0.009) as well as after adjustment on confounding factors (HR 2.16, [95% CI 1.01-4.65], p = 0.048). The CT-group OS was not statistically different between low and high BTS patients, in univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.411).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment on major baseline clinical prognostic factors, BTS was an independent prognostic factor for OS in PD-L1 ≥ 50% advanced NSCLC patients treated first-line with pembrolizumab.