Empiric Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Collaborative Group multi-institutional evidence-based guidelines for the use of empiric stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer without pathologic confirmation

Recent advances in molecular targeted therapy of lung cancer: Possible application in translation medicine

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death among all cancer deaths. This cancer is classified into two different histological subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is the most common subtype, and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which is the most aggressive subtype. Understanding the molecular characteristics of lung cancer has expanded our knowledge of the cellular origins and molecular pathways affected by each of these subtypes and has contributed to the development of new therapies. Traditional treatments for lung cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Advances in understanding the nature and specificity of lung cancer have led to the development of immunotherapy, which is the newest and most specialized treatment in the treatment of lung cancer. Each of these treatments has advantages and disadvantages and causes side effects. Today, combination therapy for lung cancer reduces side effects and increases the speed of recovery. Despite the significant progress that has been made in the treatment of lung cancer in the last decade, further research into new drugs and combination therapies is needed to extend the clinical benefits and improve outcomes in lung cancer. In this review article, we discussed common lung cancer treatments and their combinations from the most advanced to the newest.

Recurrence prediction of lung adenocarcinoma using an immune gene expression and clinical data trained and validated support vector machine classifier

Background

Immune microenvironment plays a critical role in cancer from onset to relapse. Machine learning (ML) algorithm can facilitate the analysis of lab and clinical data to predict lung cancer recurrence. Prompt detection and intervention are crucial for long-term survival in lung cancer relapse. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and genomic prognosticators for lung cancer recurrence by comparing the predictive accuracy of four ML models.

Methods

A total of 41 early-stage lung cancer patients who underwent surgery between June 2007 and October 2014 at New York University Langone Medical Center were included (with recurrence, n=16; without recurrence, n=25). All patients had tumor tissue and buffy coat collected at the time of resection. The CIBERSORT algorithm quantified tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs). Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were conducted to unearth potential molecular drivers of tumor progression. The data was split into training (75%) and validation sets (25%). Ensemble linear kernel support vector machine (SVM) ML models were developed using optimized clinical and genomic features to predict tumor recurrence.

Results

Activated natural killer (NK) cells, M0 macrophages, and M1 macrophages showed a positive correlation with progression. Conversely, T CD4+ memory resting cells were negatively correlated. In the PPI network, TNF and IL6 emerged as prominent hub genes. Prediction models integrating clinicopathological prognostic factors, tumor gene expression (45 genes), and buffy coat gene expression (47 genes) yielded varying receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curves (AUCs): 62.7%, 65.4%, and 59.7% in the training set, 58.3%, 83.3%, and 75.0% in the validation set, respectively. Notably, merging gene expression with clinical data in a linear SVM model led to a significant accuracy boost, with an AUC of 92.0% in training and 91.7% in validation.

Conclusions

Using ML algorithm, immune gene expression data from tumor tissue and buffy coat may enhance the precision of lung cancer recurrence prediction.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?-a cohort study

Background

Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with primary or secondary lung tumors.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine of patients treated for primary lung cancer or pulmonary oligometastases with SBRT from January 2013 to July 2016. We included patients at least 18 years old who had stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases and a follow-up of at least 1 month.

Results

A total of 294 patients were included. Tumors included 122 lung metastases, 89 stage I NSCLC, and 83 non-histologically confirmed lung lesions. The tracking methods were Synchrony® in 191 cases (119 gold seeds and 72 coils) and Xsight® Spine with 4D computed tomography in 103 cases. Median follow-up was 31.6 months [interquartile range (IQR), 18.1-50.2 months]. The two- and five-year probability of local control were respectively 92.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95] and 85.35% (95% CI: 0.79-0.99). The two- and five-year probability of overall survival were respectively 87.46% and 72.77% (P=0.586). Local control rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.685) (gold seeds, coils or Xsight® Spine) within tumors grouped by location, gross tumor volume (GTV) (respectively P=0.9, P=0.7, and P=0.4), planning target volume (PTV) (respectively P=0.4, P=0.9, and P=0.7), or PTV/GTV ratio (respectively P=0.6, P=0.6, and P=0.5). Metastasis-free survival and Overall survival rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.664 and P=0.586, respectively). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities and only one grade 3 pneumonitis and one grade 3 pneumothorax.

Conclusions

Fiducial-less SBRT using Xsight® Spine is a safe alternative to Synchrony® using gold seeds or coils, with comparable local control and overall survival rates and a similar toxicity profile.

High risk lung nodule: A multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management

Pulmonary nodules are often discovered incidentally during CT scans performed for other reasons. While the vast majority of nodules are benign, a small percentage may represent early-stage lung cancer with the potential for curative treatments. With the growing use of CT for both clinical purposes and lung cancer screening, the number of pulmonary nodules detected is expected to increase substantially. Despite well-established guidelines, many nodules do not receive proper evaluation due to a variety of factors, including inadequate coordination of care and financial and social barriers. To address this quality gap, novel approaches such as multidisciplinary nodule clinics and multidisciplinary boards may be necessary. As pulmonary nodules may indicate early-stage lung cancer, it is crucial to adopt a risk-stratified approach to identify potential lung cancers at an early stage, while minimizing the risk of harm and expense associated with over investigation of low-risk nodules. This article, authored by multiple specialists involved in nodule management, delves into the diagnostic approach to lung nodules. It covers the process of determining whether a patient requires tissue sampling or continued surveillance. Additionally, the article provides an in-depth examination of the various biopsy and therapeutic options available for malignant lung nodules. The article also emphasizes the significance of early detection in reducing lung cancer mortality, especially among high-risk populations. Furthermore, it addresses the creation of a comprehensive lung nodule program, which involves smoking cessation, lung cancer screening, and systematic evaluation and follow-up of both incidental and screen-detected nodules.

Lung stereotactic radiation therapy: Intercomparison of irradiation devices in terms of outcome and predictive factors

PURPOSE

To compare three different radiotherapy devices able to perform pulmonary stereotactic radiotherapy: CyberKnife® (CK), Helical Tomotherapy® (HT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study aims to define the patients' outcome in terms of SBRT efficacy and toxicities depending of the device choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, radiological, and dosimetric data of patients treated with lung SBRT between 2016 and 2020 at Lausanne University Hospital, using the Chi² test for proportions, the t-test for means comparisons, the Kaplan-Meier method for survival, and the Log-rank test and Cox-regression for intergroups comparisons.

RESULTS

We identified 111 patients treated by either CK (59.9%), VMAT (38.0%), or HT (2.1%). Compared to other techniques, CK treated comparable gross tumor volume (GTV; 2.1 vs. 1.4cm³, P=0.84) with smaller planning treatment volume (PTV; 12.3 vs. 21.9cm³, P=0.013) and lower V5 (13.5 vs. 19.9cm³, P=0.002). Local control rates at 2years were not different whatever the irradiation device, respectively of 96.2% (range, 90.8-100) and 98.1% (range, 94.4-100), P=0.68. Toxicity incidence significantly increased with V5 value>17.2% (56.0 vs. 77.4%, P=0.021).

CONCLUSION

Compared to other SBRT techniques, CK treatments permitted to treat comparable GTV with reduced PTV and V5. Toxicity incidence was less frequent when reducing the V5. CK is particularly attractive in case of multiple courses of lung SBRT or lung reirradiation.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer - A Done Deal?

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an important curative-intent treatment option for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. It offers good cancer control without invasive surgery and has become the standard of care for medically inoperable patients. The literature on SABR for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is substantial and continues to grow. However, there remain areas of controversy where data are limited - notably the use of SABR in medically operable patients. Other areas of some debate include the treatment of central/ultra-central and large (>5 cm) lesions, as well as treatment with co-existing interstitial lung disease. This review article provides an overview of the current literature together with a discussion of future directions.

The prognostic influence of histological subtypes of micropapillary tumors on patients with lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm

Objective

This study aimed to explore the value of micropapillary histological subtypes in predicting the specific surgical specificity and lymph node metastasis prognosis of early lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A total of 390 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were included who underwent surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to December 2017. The data were analysed with SPSS 26.0 statistical software, and the clinicopathological data of the two groups were compared with the chi-square test. The survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival rate between groups was analysed by the log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox model.

Results

Univariate analysis of the clinicopathological data of the patients showed that the micropapillary histological subtype was significantly associated with the survival rate of patients (p=0.007). The clinicopathological data of the patients were substituted into the Cox model for multivariate analysis, and the results showed that the micropapillary histological subtype was an independent prognostic factor affecting the survival rate of the patients (p=0.009).The average survival time of Group A (micronipple composition > 5%) was 66.7 months; the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 98.8%, 93.0%, and 80.9%, respectively.The survival of the lobectomy group was better than that of the sublobectomy group and the survival of patients with systematic dissection was better than that of patients with limited lymph node dissection. The average survival time of Group B (micronipple composition ≤ 5%) was 70.5 months; the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 99.3%, 95.4%, and 90.6%, respectively. There was no difference in the survival rate between the lobectomy group and sublobectomy group, and there was also no difference in survival between systematic lymph node dissection and limited lymph node dissection, The survival rate of Group B was significantly better than that of Group A.

Conclusion

The micropapillary histological component is an independent risk factor after surgery in patients with ≤2 cm lung adenocarcinoma. When the proportion of micropapillary components is different, the prognosis of patients is different when different surgical methods and lymph node dissections are performed. Lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection are recommended for patients with a micropapillary histological composition >5%; sublobar resection and limited lymph node dissection are recommended for patients with a micropapillary histological composition ≤5%.

Utility of Noncancerous Chest CT Features for Predicting Overall Survival and Noncancer Death in Patients With Stage I Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Background: Noncancerous imaging markers can be readily derived from pretreatment diagnostic and radiotherapy planning chest CT examinations. Objective: To explore the ability of noncancerous features on chest CT to predict overall survival (OS) and noncancer-related death in patients with stage I lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This retrospective study included 282 patients (168 female, 114 male; median age, 75 years) with stage I lung cancer treated with SBRT between January 2009 and June 2017. Pretreatment chest CT was used to quantify coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, pulmonary artery (PA)-to-aorta ratio, emphysema, and body composition in terms of the cross-sectional area and attenuation of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue at the T5, T8, and T10 vertebral levels. Associations of clinical and imaging features with OS were quantified using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. Penalized multivariable Cox PH models to predict OS were constructed using clinical features only and using both clinical and imaging features. Models' discriminatory ability was assessed by constructing time-varying ROC curves and computing AUC at prespecified times. Results: After a median OS of 60.8 months (95% CI 55.8-68.9), 148 (52.5%) patients died, including 83 (56.1%) with noncancer deaths. Higher CAC score (11-399: hazard ratio [HR] 1.83 [95% CI 1.15-2.91], P=.01; ≥400: HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.01-2.63], P=.04), higher PA-to-aorta ratio (HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.16-1.52], P<.001, per 0.1-unit increase), and lower thoracic skeletal muscle index (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.79-0.98], P=.02, per 10 cm²/m² increase) were independently associated with shorter OS. Discriminatory ability for 5-year OS was greater for the model including clinical and imaging features than for the model including clinical features only (AUC, 0.75 [95% CI 0.68-0.83] versus 0.61 [95% CI 0.53-0.70], p < .01). The model's most important clinical or imaging feature based on mean standardized regression coefficients was the PA-to-aorta ratio. Conclusions: In patients undergoing SBRT for stage I lung cancer, higher CAC score, higher PA-to-aorta ratio, and lower thoracic skeletal muscle index independently predicted worse OS. Clinical Impact: Noncancerous imaging features on chest CT performed before SBRT improve survival prediction compared with clinical features alone.

Use and Outcomes of SBRT for Early Stage NSCLC Without Pathologic Confirmation in the Veterans Health Care Administration

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use has increased among patients without pathologic confirmation (PC) of lung cancer. Empirical SBRT without PC raises concerns about variation in workup and patient selection, but national trends have not been well described. In this study, we assessed patterns of empirical SBRT use, workup, and causes of death among a large national non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort.

Methods and Materials

We identified 2221 patients treated with SBRT for cT1-T2aN0M0 NSCLC in the Veterans Affairs health care system from 2008 to 2015. We reviewed their pretreatment workup and assessed associations between absence of PC and clinical and demographic factors. We compared causes of death between PC and non-PC groups and used Cox proportional hazards modeling to compare overall survival and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS) between these groups.

Results

Treatment without PC varied from 0% to 61% among Veterans Affairs medical centers, with at least 5 cases of stage I NSCLC. Overall, 14.9% of patients were treated without PC and 8.8% did not have a biopsy attempt. Ten percent of facilities were responsible for almost two-thirds (62%) of cases of treatment without PC. Of non-PC patients, 95.5% had positron emission tomography scans, 40.6% had biopsy procedures attempted, and 12.7% underwent endobronchial ultrasound. Non-PC patients were more likely to have cT1 tumors and live outside the histoplasmosis belt. Age, sex, smoking status, and Charlson comorbidity index were similar between groups. Lung cancer was the most common cause of death in both groups. Overall survival was similar between groups, whereas non-PC patients had better LCSS (hazard ratio = 0.77, P = .031).

Conclusions

Empirical SBRT use varied widely among institutions and appropriate radiographic workup was consistently used in this national cohort. Future studies should investigate determinants of variation and reasons for higher LCSS among non-PC patients.

Multiblock Discriminant Analysis of Integrative 18F-FDG-PET/CT Radiomics for Predicting Circulating Tumor Cells in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

The main objective of the present study was to integrate 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomics with multiblock discriminant analysis for predicting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging pre-SBRT and post-SBRT (median, 5 months; range, 3-10 months). CTCs were assessed via a telomerase-based assay before and within 3 months after SBRT and dichotomized at 5 and 1.3 CTCs/mL. Pre-SBRT, post-SBRT, and delta PET/CT radiomics features (n = 1548 × 3/1562 × 3) were extracted from gross tumor volume. Seven feature blocks were constructed including clinical parameters (n = 12). Multiblock data integration was performed using block sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) referred to as Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker Discovery Using Latent Components (DIABLO) for identifying key signatures by maximizing common information between different feature blocks while discriminating CTC levels. Optimal input blocks were identified using a pairwise combination method. DIABLO performance for predicting pre-SBRT and post-SBRT CTCs was evaluated using combined AUC (area under the curve, averaged across different blocks) analysis with 20 × 5-fold cross-validation (CV) and compared with that of concatenation-based sPLS-DA that consisted of combining all features into 1 block. CV prediction scores between 1 class versus the other were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

For predicting pre-SBRT CTCs, DIABLO achieved the best performance with combined pre-SBRT PET radiomics and clinical feature blocks, showing CV AUC of 0.875 (P = .009). For predicting post-SBRT CTCs, DIABLO achieved the best performance with combined post-SBRT CT and delta CT radiomics feature blocks, showing CV AUCs of 0.883 (P = .001). In contrast, all single-block sPLS-DA models could not attain CV AUCs higher than 0.7.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiblock integration with discriminant analysis of 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomics has the potential for predicting pre-SBRT and post-SBRT CTCs. Radiomics and CTC analysis may complement and together help guide the subsequent management of patients with ES-NSCLC.

Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on lung cancer using the RIGHT checklist

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for lung cancer has increased, but the quality of these guidelines has not been systematically assessed so far. Our aim was to assess the reporting quality of CPGs on lung cancer published since 2018 using the International Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Health Care (RIGHT) instrument.

METHODS

We systematically searched the major electronic literature databases, guideline databases and medical society websites from January 2018 to November 2020 to identify all CPGs for small cell and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The search and extraction were completed using standardized forms. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the RIGHT statement. We present the results descriptively, including a stratification by selected determinants.

RESULTS

A total of 49 CPGs were included. The mean proportion across the guidelines of the 22 items of the RIGHT checklist that were appropriately reported was 57.9%. The items most common to be poorly reported were quality assurance (item 17) and description of the role of funders (item 18b), both of which were reported in only one guideline. The proportions of items within each of the seven domains of the RIGHT checklist that were correctly reported were Basic information 75.9%; background 83.2%; evidence 44.5%; recommendations 55.4%; review and quality assurance 12.2%; funding and declaration and management of interests 42.9%; and other information 38.1%. The reporting quality of guidelines did not differ between publication years. CPGs published in journals with impact factor >30 tended to be best reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that reporting in CPGs for lung cancer is suboptimal. Particularly the declaration of funding and quality assurance are poorly reported in recent CPGs on lung cancer.

Consistency of recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

To systematically assess the consistency of recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

We systematically searched relevant literature databases and websites to identify CPGs related to NSCLC. We extracted the general characteristics of the included guidelines and their recommendations and descriptively compared and analyzed the consistency of recommendations across the guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 28 NSCLC guidelines were retrieved. The recommendations covered mainly diagnosis and treatment. The recommendations in the guidelines differed substantially in various topics, such as the application of positron emission tomography (PET) and the classification of stage III. Fourteen guidelines divided stage III into two types: operable and inoperable; and the remaining 14 guidelines into three sub-stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Recommendations regarding the treatment in stage III were relatively inconsistent. In driver gene (EGFR, ALK, ROS1) positive patients, targeted therapy was the most common recommendation for first-line treatment, but recommendations regarding second-line treatment varied according to the site of the mutation. In driver gene negative patients, immunotherapy was the most frequently recommended option as both first- and second-line treatment, followed by chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

A number of countries are devoting themselves to develop NSCLC guidelines and the process of updating guidelines is accelerating, yet recommendations between guidelines are not consistent. We adopted a systematic review method to systematically search and analyze the NSCLC guidelines worldwide. We objectively reviewed the differences in recommendations for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment between the guidelines. Inconsistency of recommendations across guidelines can result from multiple potential reasons. Such as, the guidelines developed time, different countries and regions and many more. Poor consistency across CPGs can confuse the guideline users, and we therefore advocate paying more attention to examining the controversies and updating guidelines timely to improve the consistency among CPGs. Our study had also several limitations, we limited the search to CPGs published in Chinese or English, the interpretation of recommendations is inherently subjective, we did not evaluate the details of the clinical content of the CPG recommendations. Our research presents the current status of NSCLC guidelines worldwide and give the opportunity to pay more attention to the existing gaps. Further investigations should determine the reasons for inconsistency, the implications for recommendation development, and the role of synthesis across recommendations for optimal guidance of clinical care treatment. With the continuous revision and update of the guidelines, we are confident that future guidelines will be formulated with higher quality to form clear, definite and consistent recommendations for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment.

Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules?

The increasing use of low-dose CT for screening for lung cancer will inevitably identify many small, asymptomatic lung nodules and ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Current guidelines for the management of screening-detected lesions tend to advise a conservative approach based on serial imaging and intervention only if ‘suspicious’ features emerge. However, more recent developments in thoracic surgery and in the understanding of the screening-detected lesions themselves prompt some pertinent questions over this conservatism. Is CT surveillance sufficiently reliable to exclude malignancy? Is it really necessary to hold back on operative biopsy and resection given modern surgical safety and efficacy? Is the option for early surgical therapy a viable one—especially with the availability of sublobar resection today? Modern data suggests that the risk of inaction for some screening-detected lesions may be higher than expected, whereas the potential harm of surgical intervention may be substantially reduced by sublobar resection and the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques. A more pro-active approach towards offering surgery for screening-detected lesions should now be considered.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for synchronous early stage non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who present with multiple pulmonary nodules, it is often difficult to distinguish metastatic disease from synchronous primary lung cancers (SPLC). We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) alone to synchronous primary lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with synchronous AJCC 8^th Edition Stage IA-IIA NSCLC and treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to all lesions between 2009-2018 were reviewed. SPLC was defined as patients having received two courses of SBRT within 180 days for treatment of separate early stage tumors. In total, 36 patients with 73 lesions were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), and regional/distant failure (R/DF) were estimated and compared with a control cohort of solitary early stage NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 38.8 months (95% CI 14.3-not reached [NR]); 3-year PFS rates were 50.6% (35.6-72.1). Median OS was 45.9 months (95% CI: 35.9-NR); 3-year OS was 63.0% (47.4-83.8). Three-year cumulative incidence of LF and R/DF was 6.6% (3.7-13.9) and 35.7% (19.3-52.1), respectively. Patients with SPLC were compared to a control group (n = 272) of patients treated for a solitary early stage NSCLC. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS (p = .91) or OS (p = .43). Evaluation of the patterns of failure showed a trend for worse cumulative incidence of R/DF in SPLC patients as compared to solitary early stage NSCLC (p = .06).

CONCLUSION

SBRT alone to multiple lung tumors with SPLC results in comparable PFS, OS, and LF rates to a cohort of patients treated for solitary early stage NSCLC. Those with SPLC had non-significantly higher R/DF. Patients with SPLC should be followed closely for failure and possible salvage therapy.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for empirically treated hypermetabolic lung lesions: a single-institutional experience identifying the Charlson score as a key prognostic factor

Background

Though pathologic evidence for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is preferred, many patients do not receive a biopsy prior to treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This study seeks to analyze the overall survival (OS), local control, and toxicity rates for such patients.

Methods

This retrospective review included patients empirically treated with SBRT for presumed non-metastatic NSCLC at a single institution. Inclusion criteria included a hypermetabolic pulmonary lesion noted on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging but no pathological evidence of NSCLC. Patients with another known metastatic tumor were excluded. Statistical analysis was conducted with Cox proportional hazards analysis, univariate analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Ninety-one treatments in 90 unique patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were a median 77.9 years at the start of treatment and had a median Charlson score of 7. Pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) was a median 4.5 and 1.5 after treatment. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, 36-month local control of 91.3% was achieved. Twenty-four-month OS and progression-free survival were 65.4% and 44.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) ≥120 Gy was predictive of improved OS (P=0.001), with 36-month OS of 50.5% for patients with BED ≥120 Gy and only 31.6% for patients with BED <120 Gy. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, Charlson score ≥9 was predictive of decreased OS (P=0.04), and BED ≥120 Gy trended towards improved OS (P=0.08). Thirty-two cases of grade <3 toxicity were reported, and only two cases of grade 3 morbidity (fatigue) were noted.

Conclusions

Local control rates for empiric SBRT treatment for hypermetabolic, non-metastatic NSCLC are similar to those for biopsied NSCLC. OS is primarily dependent on a patient’s overall health status, which can be accurately assessed with the Charlson score. BED ≥120 Gy may also contribute to improved OS.

Low Rates of Chest Wall Toxicity When Individualizing the Planning Target Volume Margin in Patients With Early Stage Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Chest wall (CW) toxicity is a potentially debilitating complication of stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer, occurring in 10% to 40% of patients. Smaller tumor-to-CW distance has been identified as a risk factor for CW toxicity. We report our experience with individualizing the planning target volume (PTV) along the CW in an effort to reduce the volume of this organ at risk receiving 30 Gy to 50 Gy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of patients with stage I (T1-2aN0M0) non-small cell lung cancer who received stereotactic body radiation therapy between June 2009 and July 2016. Four-dimensional computed tomography was used for treatment planning. A uniform 5-mm expansion of the internal target volume was generated for the PTV. Areas of overlap with the CW were removed from the PTV. Treatment was delivered with cone beam computed tomography guidance. CW toxicity was assessed per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 36.8 months. A total of 260 tumors were treated in 225 patients. 225 tumors in 203 patients were peripheral. The internal target volumes for 143 tumors (63.6%) were located within 5 mm of the CW. The median total dose was 48 Gy (range, 42-60 Gy) in 4 fractions (range, 3-5 fractions). The overall rate of grade 1 to 2 CW toxicity was 2.2%, and 2.8% for tumors located within 5 mm of the CW. There were no grade 3/4 cases and no increase in local recurrences with the use of a truncated PTV with a 3-year local control of 92.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.4%-96.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Truncation of the PTV margin along the CW resulted in a marked reduction of CW toxicity for tumors in close proximity to the CW, with only a 2.8% rate of grade 1 to 2 CW toxicity. Despite PTV reduction, there was no appreciable increase in local failures. A multi-institutional validation of this technique is needed before general incorporation into clinical practice.

Surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy for metachronous primary lung cancer? A propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

We compared outcomes after surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) among patients with metachronous primary lung cancer (MPLC).

METHODS

Patients with MPLC were treated with either surgery (2008-2018) or SBRT (2010-2018). We used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias from various clinicopathological factors. MPLC was defined by the Martini and Melamed criteria.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients, 51 underwent surgery and 26 received SBRT. Most median clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between the surgery and SBRT groups (male sex: 67% vs 65%; age: 73 vs 77 years; time after first surgery: 6.2 vs 4.7 years; lobectomy as first procedure: 82% vs 85%; second tumor size: 11 vs 12 mm; clinical stage I: 96% vs 100%; CEA: 2.9 vs 3.0 ng/ml). However, the surgery group had significantly more ipsilateral second tumors (n = 71, 58%, P = 0.003), better performance status (P = 0.03), and preserved lung function (P = 0.02). Surgery, thus, tended to be selected for patients with good physical function and for the MPLC in the contralateral side. Five-year overall survival did not significantly differ between the surgery and SBRT groups, either before PSM (86.5% vs 65.8%, P = 0.24, log-rank) or after PSM (100% vs 84.4%, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery and SBRT for MPLC patients are safe and feasible treatments with similar outcomes. However, this finding should be verified by a random controlled trial with a larger study cohort.

Circulating Tumor Cells Are Associated with Recurrent Disease in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Although stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is effective in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 10%-15% of patients will fail regionally and 20%-25% distantly. We evaluate a novel circulating tumor cell (CTC) assay as a prognostic marker for increased risk of recurrence following SBRT.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Ninety-two subjects (median age, 71 years) with T1a (64%), T1b (23%), or T2a (13%) stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT were prospectively enrolled. CTCs were enumerated by utilizing a GFP-expressing adenoviral probe that detects elevated telomerase activity in cancer cells. Samples were obtained before, during, and serially up to 24 months after treatment. SBRT was delivered to a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy), mostly commonly in four to five fractions (92%).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight of 92 subjects (41%) had a positive CTC test prior to SBRT. A cutoff of ≥5 CTCs/mL before treatment defined favorable (n = 78) and unfavorable (n = 14) prognostic groups. Increased risk of nodal (P = 0.04) and distant (P = 0.03) failure was observed in the unfavorable group. Within 3 months following SBRT, CTCs continued to be detected in 10 of 35 (29%) subjects. Persistent detection of CTCs was associated with increased risk of distant failure (P = 0.04) and trended toward increased regional (P = 0.08) and local failure (P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher pretreatment CTCs and persistence of CTCs posttreatment is significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence outside the targeted treatment site. This suggests that CTC analysis may potentially identify patients at higher risk for regional or distant recurrences and who may benefit from either systemic therapy and/or timely locoregional salvage treatment.

Integrated, Multidisciplinary Management of Pulmonary Nodules Can Streamline Care and Improve Adherence to Recommendations

Every year millions of pulmonary nodules are discovered incidentally and through lung cancer screening programs. Management of these nodules is often suboptimal, with low follow-up rates and poor provider understanding of management approaches. There is an emerging body of literature about how to optimize management of pulmonary nodules. The Pulmonary Nodule and Lung Cancer Screening Clinic (PNLCSC) at Massachusetts General Hospital was founded in 2012 to manage pulmonary nodules via a multidisciplinary approach with optimized support staff. Recommendations from clinic providers and treatment details were recorded for all patients seen at the PNLCSC. Adherence to recommendations and outcomes were also tracked and reviewed. From October 2012 to September 2019, 1,136 patients were seen at the PNLCSC, each for a mean of 1.8 appointments (range, 1-10). A total of 356 procedures were recommended by the clinic and 271 patients were referred for surgery and/or radiation. The majority of interventions (74%) were recommended at the initial PNLCSC appointment. In total, 211 patients (19%) evaluated at the PNLCSC had pathologically confirmed pulmonary malignancies or were treated empirically with radiation. Among patients followed by the clinic, the adherence rate to clinic recommendations was 95%. This study shows how a multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary nodule management can streamline care and optimize follow-up. The PNLCSC provides a template that can be replicated in other health systems. It also provides an example of how multidisciplinary approaches can be applied to other complex conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates how an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to management of pulmonary nodules can streamline patient care and improve adherence to provider recommendations. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs.

Stereotactic Image Guided Lung Radiation Therapy for Clinical Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Long-Term Report From a Multi-Institutional Database of Patients Treated With or Without a Pathologic Diagnosis

PURPOSE

Early stage lung cancer is treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo surgical resection. Some patients' comorbidities are so severe that they are unable to even undergo a biopsy. A clinical diagnosis without biopsy before SBRT has been used, but there are limited data on its efficacy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data on patients treated with SBRT for non-small cell lung cancer, with and without tissue confirmation, were collected from multiple institutions across Europe, Canada, and the United States. Patients with a minimum of 2 years of comprehensive follow up were selected for analysis. Treatment and patient characteristics were compared. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and rates of local recurrence (LR), regional recurrence (RR), and distant metastasis (DM) were calculated and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 701 patients were identified, of which 67% had tissue confirmation of their tumors. The 3- and 5-year outcomes for OS, CSS, and DFS were 83.8%, 93.1%, 69%, and 60.6%, 86.7%, 45.5%, respectively. The rates for LR, RR, and DM at 3 and 5 years were 6.4%, 9.3%, 14.3%, and 10.5%, 14.3%, 19.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes or recurrences between the biopsy and no-biopsy cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for clinically diagnosed lung cancers is efficacious in appropriately selected patients, with similar outcomes as those with a pathologic diagnosis. Thorough clinical and radiographic evaluations in a multidisciplinary setting are critical to the management of these patients.