Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization

Contraceptive strategies for reducing the risk of reproductive cancers

Reproductive cancers, encompassing various malignancies like endometrial, ovarian, cervical cancer, and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, pose a significant global health burden. Understanding their patterns is vital for effective prevention and management. Contraceptives show a protective effect against some of these cancers. This clinical guidance document aims to elucidate the disease burden of reproductive cancers and the evidence supporting contraceptive methods in prevention and management. Regional disparities in incidence and mortality highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions, particularly in low-resource settings. Healthcare providers must weigh individual risk profiles and medical eligibility criteria when discussing contraceptive options. Enhanced health literacy through direct patient education is essential for leveraging low-cost behavioral interventions to mitigate reproductive cancer risks.

High variability in self-pay pricing for vasectomy and vasectomy reversal in the United States

CONTEXT

In the United States (US) men who undergo vasectomy and/or vasectomy reversal (vasovasotomy) are likely to pay out-of-pocket for these procedures. We characterized the publicly disclosed pricing of both procedures with a focus on variability in self-pay prices.

METHODS

We queried all US hospitals for publicly disclosed prices of vasectomy and vasovasotomy. We assessed interhospital variability in self-pay pricing and compared hospitals charging high (≥75th percentile) and low (≤25th percentile) self-pay prices for either procedure. We also examined trends in pricing after the 2022 US Supreme Court decision that allowed individual states to ban abortion.

RESULTS

Of 6692 hospitals, 1375 (20.5%) and 281 (4.2%) disclosed self-pay prices for vasectomy and vasovasotomy, respectively. There was a 17-fold difference between the 10th and 90th percentile self-pay prices for vasectomy ($421-$7147) and a 39-fold difference for vasovasotomy ($446-$17,249). Compared with hospitals charging low (≤25th percentile) self-pay prices for vasectomy or vasovasotomy, hospitals charging high (≥75th percentile) prices were larger (median 150 vs. 59 beds, p < 0.001) and more likely to be for-profit (31.2% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001), academic-affiliated (52.7% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001), and located in an urban zip code (70.1% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001). From October 2022 to April 2023, the median self-pay price of vasectomy increased by 10% (from $1667 to $1832) while the median self-pay price of vasovasotomy decreased by 16% (from $3309 to $2786).

CONCLUSION

We found large variability in self-pay pricing for vasectomy and vasectomy reversal, which may serve as a barrier to the accessibility of male reproductive care.

Attitudes towards vasectomy and its acceptance as a method of contraception among clinical-year medical students in a Malaysian private medical college

INTRODUCTION

This study explored attitudes towards vasectomy and its acceptance as a method of contraception among clinical-year medical students, and determined the association between their demographic characteristics, and attitudes and acceptance.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among clinical-year medical students from a Malaysian private medical college using a self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

There were 330 participants with a female preponderance and a mean age of 22.0 ± 1.1 years. The largest proportion of respondents were from Year 3. The vast majority were ethnically Malay (91.8%) and followed Islam (92.4%). Overall, 60.9% of participants had a positive attitude towards vasectomy and 76.0% showed good acceptance. Gender, academic year, ethnicity and religion variables were not associated with attitudes and acceptance (p > 0.05). A significantly higher proportion of male respondents thought that vasectomy was religiously forbidden and would give a bad impression. A significantly higher proportion of Year 5 students agreed to the statement 'I would recommend vasectomy to relatives, friends and people close to me' compared to Year 3 and 4 students.

CONCLUSION

Students' perception of vasectomy as a contraceptive method was encouraging. Our results suggest that their knowledge improved as medical training progressed, and attitudes evolved for the better irrespective of their traditional, cultural and religious beliefs - highlighting the importance of providing students with evidence-based learning about male sterilisation, which is more cost-effective and is associated with lower morbidity than female sterilisation. A qualitative study involving students from different ethnicities and religions would provide a better understanding of this subject.

He's a real man: a qualitative study of the social context of couples' vasectomy decisions among a racially diverse population

Vasectomy has advantages with respect to safety and cost when compared with female sterilization. The reasons underlying the overall low use of vasectomy, particularly among Black and Latinos, have not been adequately explored. The goals of this study were to (a) explore the social context of vasectomy decisions and (b) generate hypotheses about the social factors contributing to differences in vasectomy use by race/ethnicity. Fourteen group and nine couples interviews were conducted. Participants were 37 heterosexual couples aged 25 to 55 years who had reached their desired family size and self-identified as Black, Latino, or White. Participants discussed reasons that men and women would or would not select male sterilization. Reasons to select vasectomy included a desire to care for their current family, sharing contraceptive responsibility, and infidelity. Reasons not to select vasectomy included negative associations with the term sterilization, loss of manhood, and permanence. Misconceptions about vasectomy included misunderstandings about the vasectomy procedure and adverse postvasectomy sexual function. In addition, Black and Latino participants cited perceived ease of reversibility of female sterilization and lack of support around vasectomy as reasons not to choose it. Improving communication and social support for vasectomy, particularly among Black and Latino communities, may improve vasectomy utilization. Misconceptions regarding female and male sterilization should be targeted in counseling sessions to ensure men, women, and couples are making informed contraceptive decisions.

Barriers and facilitators affecting vasectomy acceptability (a multi stages study in a sample from north eastern of Iran), 2005-2007

BACKGROUND

In this study we aimed to find factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Shahroud (north eastern Iran).

METHODS

This study was carried out in three stages. The first stage was a survey of couples that had the vasectomy procedure during 2004-2007 in the Shahroud area. In the second stage of the study we compared characteristics of the cases (the couples who had the vasectomy procedure during the study period) and controls (including couples with at least one child that choose other contraceptive methods excluding a vasectomy) using χ² and T student tests. In the third stage of the study we aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of those who did not choose to have a vasectomy as there contraception method by filling out questionnaires in personal interviews.

RESULTS

An increasing trend toward the vasectomy procedure was observed during 2005 to 2007. We found positive associations between male and female educational levels and choosing to have a vasectomy (p < 0.05). Majority of women (88.44%) thought that their husbands would prefer to have a tubectomy to a vasectomy.

CONCLUSION

The study results show a necessity for both couples to participate in educational programs about the vasectomy procedure.

Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization

Male sterilization (vasectomy) is the most effective form and only long-acting form of contraception available to men in the United States. Compared to female sterilization, it is more efficacious, more cost-effective, and has lower rates of complications. Despite these advantages, in the United States, vasectomy is utilized at less than half the rate of female sterilization. In addition, vasectomy is least utilized among black and Latino populations, groups with the highest rates of female sterilization. This review provides an overview of vasectomy use and techniques, and explores reasons for the disparity in vasectomy utilization in the United States.

Placement of the Essure Permanent Birth Control Device with Fluoroscopic Guidance: A Novel Method for Tubal Sterilization

An effective transcervical method for fluoroscopically guided fallopian tube occlusion has long been sought for female sterilization. The Essure permanent birth control device was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in November 2002 and is currently indicated for hysteroscopic placement. In a series of eight patients, bilateral Essure microcoils were placed with fluoroscopic guidance in seven patients for a success rate of 87.5%. One patient described peri- and postprocedure pelvic pain, otherwise no complications were identified. All patients returned to normal activities within 24 hours. Fluoroscopically guided transcervical tubal sterilization with the Essure microcoil device (Conceptus, San Carlos, CA) is a viable outpatient procedure.

Advances in contraception

Many safe and effective contraceptive methods are currently available, and a stream of new products is being introduced to the market. This article presents the histories, descriptions, and future trends for oral contraceptive pills, hormonal implants and injections, and intrauterine devices. Other methods discussed include barrier methods, spermicides, and emergency contraception, and permanent sterilization.

Vasectomy in the United States, 1991 and 1995

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess whether the controversy surrounding publications linking vasectomy and prostate cancer has had an effect on vasectomy acceptance and practice in the United States.

METHODS

National probability surveys of urology, general surgery, and family practices were undertaken in 1992 and 1996.

RESULTS

Estimates of the total number of vasectomies performed, population rate, and proportion of practices performing vasectomy were not significantly different in 1991 and 1995.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides no solid evidence that the recent controversy over prostate cancer has influenced vasectomy acceptance or practice in the United States. However, the use of vasectomy appears to have leveled off in the 1990s.

Laparoscopic sterilisation: opinion and practice among gynaecologists in Scotland

OBJECTIVES

1. To produce a list of evidence-based criteria for good quality care relating to female laparoscopic sterilisation. 2. To assess the level of agreement with each criterion among gynaecologists in Scotland. 3. To obtain an overview of current sterilisation practice for comparison with the agreed criteria.

DESIGN

1. Agreement with criteria assessed by questionnaire survey; 2. Overview of current practice obtained by questionnaire survey and by casenote review.

SETTING

Scotland.

SAMPLE

1. Questionnaire survey: all 132 consultant gynaecologists in NHS practice. 2. casenote review: 988 consecutive women sterilised in 12 representative hospitals.

RESULTS

The response rate to the questionnaire survey was 94%. A list of 15 evidence-based criteria was produced, covering patient selection, information and counselling, techniques of tubal occlusion and timing of sterilisation. All 15 suggested criteria gained an overall balance of support among responding gynaecologists. Similar impressions of current practice were gained from the questionnaire survey and from the casenote review. Aspects of practice which measured up well to the agreed criteria included: only 6% of women sterilised were younger than 25 years of age; over 85% of casenotes included clear documentation that women had been counselled regarding failure rate and intended permanency; 88% of sterilisations were performed, or directly supervised by, a gynaecologist of consultant or senior registrar status; and only 2% of sterilisations were undertaken in combination with induced abortion. Aspects of practice which compared poorly with the agreed criteria, and for which recommendations for change have been made, included: only 22% of casenotes mentioned that the option of vasectomy had been discussed; only 30% of gynaecologists indicated that they provide locally produced information leaflets as an adjunct to counselling; four methods of tubal occlusion (including unipolar diathermy) were in use; and there were wide variations among hospitals in the use of day-case care, ranging from 19% to 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

A list of criteria for good quality care in relation to sterilisation has been validated by agreement among Scottish gynaecologists. Current practice (as assessed by questionnaire survey and casenote review) has been compared with the criteria and some recommendations for change in practice have been made. Following dissemination of these results and recommendations, re-audit will be undertaken in order to identify any changes.

Vasectomy in the United States, 1991

OBJECTIVES

Recent conflicting findings on possible health risks related to vasectomy have underscored the need for reliable and representative estimates of numbers and rates of vasectomies in the United States. The purpose of this study was to estimate the annual US number, rate, and characteristics of vasectomies in 1991.

METHODS

A national survey of urology, general surgery, and family practice physician practices was conducted with probability sampling methods (n = 1685 physicians).

RESULTS

An estimated 493,487 (95% confidence interval = 450,480, 536,494) vasectomies were performed in 1991, for a rate of 10.3 procedures per 1000 men aged 25 through 49 years. Most vasectomies were performed by urologists, and most were done in physicians' offices with local anesthesia and ligation as the method of occlusion. The rate of vasectomies was highest in the Midwest.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides the first national estimates of the number and rate of vasectomies in the United States, as well as the first estimates of occlusion method used. Results confirm previous findings that urologists perform most vasectomies and that most vasectomies are performed with local anesthesia. Recommendations include the monitoring of vasectomy numbers and rates as well as demographic studies of men obtaining vasectomies.

Physicians' attitudes, recommendations and practice of male and female sterilization in São Paulo

While prevalence of vasectomy is low in Brazil, female sterilization is very high. The potential for growth of vasectomy services may be related to attitudes and practices of physicians. In 1984, 660 physicians at seven major hospitals in São Paulo were randomly selected from a total population of 2207 physicians in these hospitals. They were interviewed about their attitudes towards family planning in general, and specifically towards voluntary sterilization. A high degree of vasectomy among this medical community is indicated by its relatively high prevalence among married physicians and their spouses; about one in ten reported that either they or their spouse had had a vasectomy. Half of the physicians who perform sterilizations perform vasectomies: 22% of obstetricians and gynecologists, 85% of surgeons, and all urologists. In general, physicians would recommend vasectomy and tubal ligation equally often to their clients. Depending on the circumstances, up to 85% of all physicians recommend some sterilization procedure. Recommendation was modified by the type of procedure a physician performed, and by the patient's characteristics. Physician's recommendations of sterilization increased with age and parity of patient and was related to the health conditions and socioeconomic circumstances of the couple.

Sterilization: Canadian choices

Significant differences in cost and safety between vasectomy and tubal ligation have been reported. For this reason the incidence of these two procedures between 1976 and 1986 was studied to obtain information upon which future policy decisions might be based. Although tubal ligation predominated in almost every province and year its rate declined by 27.6% over the study period, whereas the rate of vasectomy increased by 39.1%. When projected to 1988 the national rates for the two procedures became nearly equal; those for Quebec had become equal by 1986. Provincial differences were most marked in eastern Canada, where neighbouring provinces had the highest and the lowest rates of sterilization in the country. Given the relative economic and surgical disadvantages of tubal ligation, policymakers may wish to consider fostering an increased acceptance of vasectomy, particularly in areas where such acceptance continues to be slow.

Male or female sterilization: a comparative study

The study compares 709 males and 546 females recruited from a well-defined geographic area and sterilized during a 5-year period at the same hospital. Medical records were reviewed and questionnaires sent out. Widespread satisfaction with the sterilization was found. The sterilized women had experienced contraceptive side effects and failures more often than the men. Only 70% of the laparoscopic sterilizations could be carried out during a 1-day admission, 25% of the women complained about long-term sequelae, and there were 1% failures. The vasectomies were carried out on an outpatient basis, there were few postoperative symptoms, and 0.5% failures were recorded. Female sterilization was at least four times as expensive as vasectomy. It is concluded that vasectomy is generally to be preferred to female sterilization, and that the preoperative guidance should involve both man and wife.

Vasectomies: Motivations and Attitude of Physicians-as-Patients

Vasectomies have not been as widely favoured as have techniques of sterilization in Canada for some years, in spite of having a better morbidity and mortality record than tubal sterilizations. Physicians or others who themselves have had the procedure seem to be in an especially favourable position to describe accurately the advantages and risks of this surgery, as well as its alternatives. Questionnaires inquiring about reasons for choosing vasectomy were sent to 42 medical doctors who had undergone the procedure. Counsellors can usefully proffer to inquiring patients the same advantages that reportedly motivated the medical doctors: convenience, economy, and safety.

Spousal veto over family planning services

In many countries a spouse, usually the husband, can veto a partner's use of family planning services. Where spousal veto acts as a barrier to family planning services it represents a serious threat to the lives and health of women and children. Removal of spousal authorization requirements has been shown to increase the use of family planning services. The Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia, for example, removed their requirement in 1982 and clinic utilization increased by 26 per cent within a few months. Courts of several countries have held that spousal veto practices violate principles of personal privacy and autonomy and the right to health care. The effect of such judgements has been to reinforce rights to sexual nondiscrimination found, for example, in national constitutions and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. This article discusses the nature and application of spousal veto practices, explains how such requirements can violate certain human rights, and explores possible remedies to this problem, including ministerial, legislative, and judicial initiatives.