Percutaneous stabilization of unstable fractures of the humerus

Open reduction and internal fixation of the proximal humerus with femoral head allograft augmentation "the French fry technique"

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 4%-8% of injuries to the appendicular skeleton. Most are stable, minimally displaced osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, and are the result of low-energy falls. A large majority of these patients regain adequate shoulder function without operative intervention. Surgery is considered in approximately 20% of patients because they require improved shoulder function for their activities of daily living or because of the significant deformity of their fracture and the need to restore functional alignment, length, and rotation in active, higher demand individuals. However, fixation of these fractures can pose a challenge due to poor bone quality and displacing forces of the rotator cuff. This is especially true in 3-part and 4-part fractures. These factors lead to the high failure rates seen with early attempts at osteosynthesis. In the last 2 decades, locking plate technology has been an innovation in treating these complex fractures. Despite the improvements in torsional strength and rigidity, outcome studies on locking plate technology demonstrate equivocal results with complication rates as high as 20%-30% and a revision rate of 10%. Specifically, these complications include avascular necrosis, varus collapse, intra-articular screw penetration, and postoperative stiffness. Varus collapse occurs when the weak osteoporotic bone fails around the implant. In turn, fibular strut endosteal augmentation was introduced to provide additional support and decrease implant failure rates in displaced fractures with varus coronal malalignment and significant metaphyseal bone loss. Although clinically successful and biomechanically superior to plate-only constructs, a few concerns remain. In turn, we introduce a novel technique of creating individual cancellous femoral head allograft struts or "French fries" that provides structural support for the humeral head but does not have the potential problems of a cortical fibular strut.

The Axillary Nerve Danger Zone in Percutaneous Fixation in the Pediatric Shoulder: The "1-Mountain-3-Valleys" Principle

BACKGROUND

Adult literature cites an axillary nerve danger zone of 5 to 7 cm distal to the acromion tip for open or percutaneous shoulder surgery, but that may not be valid for younger patients. This study sought to quantify the course of the axillary nerve in adolescent patients with reference to easily identifiable intraoperative anatomic and radiographic parameters.

METHODS

A single-institution hospital database was reviewed for shoulder magnetic resonance images (MRIs) in patients 10 to 17 years old. One hundred and one MRIs from patients with a mean age of 15.6 ± 1.2 years (range, 10 to 17 years) were included. Axillary nerve branches were identified in the coronal plane as they passed lateral to the proximal humerus and were measured in relation to identifiable intraoperative surface and radiographic landmarks, including the acromion tip, apex of the humeral head, lateral physis, and central apex of the physis. The physeal apex height (i.e., 1 "mountain") was defined as the vertical distance between the most lateral point of the humeral physis (LPHP) and the central intraosseous apex of the physis.

RESULTS

Axillary nerve branches were found in all specimens, adjacent to the lateral cortex of the proximal humerus. A mean of 3.7 branches (range, 2 to 6) were found. The mean distance from the most proximal branch (BR1) to the most distal branch (BR2) was 11.7 mm. The pediatric danger zone for the axillary nerve branches ranged from 6.6 mm proximal to 33.1 mm distal to the LPHP. The danger zone in relation to percent of physeal apex height included from 62% proximal to 242% distal to the LPHP.

CONCLUSIONS

All branches were found distal to the apex of the physis (1 "mountain" height proximal to the LPHP). Distal to the LPHP, no branches were found beyond a distance of 3 times the physeal apex height (3 "valleys"). In children and adolescents, percutaneous fixation of the proximal humerus should be performed with cortical penetration outside of this range. These parameters serve as readily identifiable intraoperative radiographic landmarks to minimize iatrogenic nerve injury.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides valuable landmarks for percutaneous approaches to the proximal humerus. The surgical approach for the placement of percutaneous implants should be adjusted accordingly (i.e., performed at least 1 mountain proximal or 3 valleys distal to the LPHP) in order to prevent iatrogenic injury to the axillary nerve.

The effect of different pin configurations on cyclic stability in pediatric proximal humerus fracture fixation: A Sawbones model study

BACKGROUND

In sawbones with proximal humerus fracture model, three different fixation configurations, Parallel-Straight K-wires, Cross-Straight K-wires and Palm-Tree Method, were biomechanically compared.

METHODS

A total of 36 anatomical pediatric humerus sawbones models were used. They were divided into three equal groups; parallel fixation with straight K-wires (Group PS), cross fixation with straight K-wires (Group CS), and Palm-Tree Method (Group PT). Models were tested in abduction and torsional at a speed of 0.5 mm/s and a 0-5 mm displacement range. Loading (N) and Stiffness (N/mm) data were calculated and compared statistically.

RESULTS

Group PS was significantly higher than the other two groups in abduction bending cyclic load values (P<0.001). It was also significantly higher in Group CS than in Group PT (P < 0.001). No significant differences were detected between the three different fixation groups' cyclic torsional load values (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The parallel configuration with straight K-wires will provide a more stable fixation than the cross configuration with straight or Palm-Tree Method in pediatric proximal humeral sawbones fracture modeling.

Intrathoracic migration of a K-wire after percutaneous fixation of a proximal humerus fracture

Proximal humerus fractures are common in elderly patients. Not all patient are fit for major surgery. Percutaneous fixation can be a suitable option though surgeons should be aware of the risks and complications. This case is about a 90-year-old woman with a proximal humerus fracture. After closed anatomical reduction we performed percutaneous K-wire fixation of the humerus fracture with a single K-wire. Five days postoperatively the patient experienced increased pain and dyspnea due to a pneumothorax caused by intrathoracic migration of the K-wire. Percutaneous fixation can be a suitable treatment for low-maintenance and fragile patients but surgeons should act with caution. Multiple threaded K-wires with a bend-free end should be used to reduce the risk for loss of repositioning or migration of the K-wire.

Cell therapy for posttraumatic shoulder osteonecrosis

PURPOSE

This study compared the clinical and radiological results of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell implantation with traditional simple core decompression (CD) using a matched pair case-control design for osteonecrosis of the humeral head (ONHH) after fracture of the proximal humerus.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who had surgery for ONHH. Thirty patients had been treated with cell therapy between 2010 and October 2015, with 18 patients at pre-collapse stage (8 stages-I, 10 stages-II), and 12 patients at post-collapse stages (7 stages-III and 5 stages-IV). Using a matched pair case-control design, these 30 study patients were compared to 34 other patients who were treated with simple core decompression (CD) without cells (control group).

METHODS

The cell therapy group was treated with percutaneous mesenchymal cell (MSCs) injection obtained from bone marrow (BM) concentration. During a mean follow-up duration of 7years (5 to 10years), radiographs performed each year were used to evaluate the radiological results; the Constant score and visual analogue scale were chosen to assess the clinical results. We assessed stage progression, collapse and arthroplasty conversion rate. Survivor rate analysis was performed using these parameters as the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

Among the 30 shoulders included in the cell therapy group, three (10%) humeral heads had collapsed at the most recent follow-up, versus 25 (74%) in 34 shoulders after simple core decompression (P<0.0001). As consequence, we observed statistically significant difference (P=0.0001) in the humeral head survival (absence of arthroplasty conversion) rate at the end time point between the cell therapy group (93% survival) and simple core decompression (26% survival). Better results were obtained for early stages (stages I and II) osteonecrosis without collapse at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Core decompression with cell therapy was a safe and effective procedure for treatment in the pre-collapse stages of posttraumatic shoulder osteonecrosis and improved the outcome of the disease as compared with simple core decompression without cells.

Outcomes of 188 Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with a Dedicated External Fixator with Follow-up Ranging from 2 to 12 Years

BACKGROUND

The treatment of a displaced proximal humeral fracture is still a matter of controversy. Minimally invasive techniques are considered promising options. The purpose of this study was to report outcomes at medium to long-term follow-up after surgical treatment with pins stabilized with an external fixator.

METHODS

A total of 235 patients (average age, 64 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 62 to 65 years]) were treated with closed or open reduction and fixation with pins stabilized by an external fixator specifically designed for proximal humeral fractures. The pins were inserted using a "pins-crossing-fracture" or a "pins-bridging-fracture" technique. One hundred and eighty-eight patients had a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV), a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and, for 155 patients, the Constant score.

RESULTS

Eighty-one (43%) of the 188 patients had a 2-part fracture, 60 (32%) had a 3-part fracture, and 47 (25%) had a 4-part fracture. The reduction was performed with percutaneous maneuvers in 120 shoulders or a deltopectoral approach, in 68. The external fixator was applied using a "pins-crossing-fracture" technique in 133 shoulders and using a "pins-bridging-fracture" technique in 55. At last follow-up, mean clinical scores were as follows: OSS, 42.6 (95% CI, 42 to 44); SSV, 85.5 (95% CI, 83 to 88); and VAS for pain, 1 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.2). The complication rate at 3 months was 16% (37 of 235). The most frequent complication was pin-track infection (19 of 235, 8%). A total of 50 patients had ≥1 complication (50 of 188, 27%) and 6 (3%) underwent revision surgery. More complications were observed with the "pins-crossing-fracture" technique.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the use of the external fixator has been a valuable option in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The complication and revision rates were acceptable. Most of the complications encountered were manageable without revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The "FraMo" System: A New Mini-Invasive Technique in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures

Fractures of the proximal humerus are relatively common injuries in adults accounting for 5% of fractures. Nowadays the most common technique used is open reduction internal fixation with LCP plates. The risks associated with open reduction internal fixation had led us to develop and apply a "hybrid" system, which is based on external fixation and closed surgery principles. This system is capable of stabilize up to 4 fragment fractures on different planes while conferring a strong enough fixation to maintain fracture reduction while allowing the patient to perform passive and active movement since the first day following the surgery. Our study group started on November 2009 until December 2015 and consisted of 118 patients with a mean age of 68.84±10.52 years for females (76) and 65.62±12.56 for males (44). Patients were classified according to the AO/OTA (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma association) Classification. In a few patients we performed mini lateral accesses to allow reduction of the humeral head and greater tuberosity. Shoulder mobilization was initiated from the first day following surgery. The external fixator was removed at 5 weeks with successive check-ups at 3, 6, and 12 months. The majority of type B and type C1 fractures had almost a complete functional recovery. Patients also, especially in the elderly, reported a good quality of life without pain during any range of motion. Our group of patients, after removal of the apparatus at 5 weeks following the surgery, had a mean articular range of motion with active abduction of 90 degrees and about 100 degrees with passive abduction. Postoperative CS scores at 12 months follow-up was 75,47±8.02. In addition there was also significant (P<0.05) improvement between preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale measurements (in cm), 7.67±2.70 and 1.71±2.08, respectively. This technique has shown good functional results with reduced surgical risks and complications that are typical of open reduction surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures, is quick in execution and minimally invasive. Given the very good results of the study of this new external fixation technique has shown to be a viable option for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

Displaced humeral surgical neck fractures: classification and results of third-generation percutaneous intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

The high rates of complications and reoperations observed with the early designs of first-generation (unlocked) and second-generation (bent design) humeral intramedullary nail (IMNs) have discouraged their use by most surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a third-generation (straight, locking, low-profile, tuberosity-based fixation) IMN, inserted through a percutaneous approach, for the treatment of displaced 2-part surgical neck fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent placement of a third-generation IMN to treat a displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture (AO/OTA type 11A3). The mean age at surgery was 57 years (range, 17-84 years). After percutaneous insertion through the humeral head, the IMN was used as a reduction tool. Static locking fixation was achieved after axial fracture compression ("back-slap" hammering technique). Patients were reviewed and underwent radiography with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 12-53 months).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 3 types of surgical neck fractures were observed: with valgus head deformity (Type A = 8 cases), shaft translation without head deformity (Type B = 19 cases), or with varus head deformity (Type C = 14 cases). At final follow-up, all fractures went on to union, and the mean humeral neck-shaft angle was 132° ± 5°. We observed 2 malunions and 1 case of partial humeral head avascular necrosis. No cases underwent screw migration or intra-articular penetration. At last review, mean active forward elevation was 146° (range, 90°-180°) and mean external rotation was 50° (range, 20°-80°). The mean Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value were 71 (range, 43-95) and 80% (range, 50%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade insertion of a third-generation IMN through a percutaneous approach provides a high rate of fracture healing, excellent clinical outcome scores, and a low rate of complications. No morbidity related to the passage of the nail through the supraspinatus muscle and the cartilage was observed. The proposed A, B, and C classification allows choosing the optimal entry point for intramedullary nailing.

Transosseous Suture Fixation of True 4-part Valgus Impacted Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: Clinical and Radiological Outcome in 49 Patients

Background

The valgus-impacted (VI) 4-part fractures are a subset of fractures of the proximal humerus with a unique anatomic configuration characterized by a relatively lower incidence of avascular necrosis after operative intervention.

Objectives

The present study reports the midterm clinical and radiological results of a large series of consecutive patients with 4-part VI fractures treated with a minimal invasive technique of internal fixation.

Methods

Over a ten-year period (2004-2014), we treated 56 patients with a true 4-part valgus impacted fracture of the proximal part of the humerus. Four patients were lost to follow-up and three died, leaving 49 patients (33 female, 16 males, average age 60,1 years) available for the study. Fracture fixation was achieved through the lateral transdeltoid approach with transosseous suturing of the tuberosities to each other, to the metaphysis and to the articular part of the humeral head avoiding gross disimpaction of the humeral head from the valgus position. Functional outcome assessment was performed using the parameters of the Constant-Murley score within a mean follow up period of 43,8 months (range, 24 to 115 months).

Results

All fractures were united within the first 3 months except one that showed late displacement and finally nonunion. The median Constant score was 81,7 points and the functional score in comparison with the unaffected shoulder was 86.2%. There were three patients with total Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the head revised to hemiarthroplasty. The nonunion case was revised to reverse shoulder arthroplasty 12 months after surgery. In five cases, absorption of the greater tuberosity was noted in the last radiographic control without any serious consequences to the shoulder function.

Conclusion

Advantages of this minimally invasive technique can be summarized as shorter operative time, no use of hardware, minimal soft tissue damage, low incidence of avascular necrosis, stable osteosynthesis with "tension band effect" and adequate rotator cuff repair allowing for early joint motion.

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures in children with a modified palm tree technique

Although most pediatric proximal humeral fractures can be successfully treated conservatively with satisfactory results, many operative techniques have been described for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous fixation using a modified palm tree technique for proximal humerus fractures in children. Between March 2011 and May 2013, the modified palm tree technique was used for the management of 30 children (20 boys and 10 girls) with displaced proximal humeral fractures. The average age of the patients was 11.5 years (age range from 8 to 15 years). They were evaluated clinically by the Constant-Murley score and by radiological analysis. The average follow-up duration was 18 months. The average time of fracture union was 6 weeks (range from 4 to 8 weeks). The average Constant score of the patients was 92 (range from 87 to 95), with excellent results in 27 (90%) cases, good results in three (10%) cases, and no fair or poor results (0%). The reported complications were superficial pin-tract infection in five cases, treated by daily dressing and local antibiotics, and malunion with a varus deformity in two cases (about 15°), with no recorded cases with deep infection. None of the cases required open reduction. No cases were complicated by avascular necrosis of the head humerus or loss of fixation. Kirschner wires were removed after an average period of 7 weeks. The modified palm tree technique represents an efficient method for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in children. It produces a good grip in both the proximal and distal fragments. It allows for early joint movements.

Geometry of Proximal Humerus Locking Plates

OBJECTIVES

Proximal humerus fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation with periarticular locking plates. This study compared the geometry of proximal humerus locking plate's screw distribution, amount of bone-screw interface, and the volume the screws occupy within the humeral head, as well as how leaving the screws short of the articular surface affects these measures.

METHODS

Locking plates from 7 manufacturers were applied to foam humerus models. The entry and exit hole of each screw trajectory was digitized using a 3-dimensional motion tracking system. A trajectory for each screw was modeled, as well as the volume enclosed by the screw trajectories. The following outcome metrics were calculated: the bone-screw interface, the volume enclosed by the screws, and the effect of leaving the screws short of the articular surface.

RESULTS

Biomet had the most bone-screw interface (7259 mm), whereas Zimmer had the least (3982 mm). The original Synthes plate had the largest screw volume, occupying 31.5% of the humeral head, whereas Smith & Nephew and Zimmer had the lowest volumes, occupying 21.2% and 12.6%, respectively. Leaving the screws 15 mm short of the articular surface resulted in the most reduction in volume for the Depuy plate (50%) and the least reduction for the new version of the Synthes plate (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Many different manufactured periarticular locking plates exist to stabilize a proximal humeral fracture. Clinicians need to be familiar with the different plate configurations, screw lengths, and trajectories, which affect potential biomechanical performance and can optimize fracture site maintenance.

Post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the proximal humerus

Post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the proximal humerus represents a challenging problem to the surgeon. It is commonly seen following multi-fragmentary fractures of the proximal humerus which may affect the long-term functional recovery after such injuries. This review summarises the current evidence on risk factors, reasons why estimating its epidemiology is difficult, the vascular supply of the humeral head, classification, and management options.

A review of current concepts in the management of proximal humerus fractures

Fracture of the proximal humerus is a common orthopaedic injury and is likely to increase in incidence. This fracture type is associated with a wide variety in fracture morphology and as a direct result there are many treatment options available. It is often not clear what treatment modality should be utilised. This article reviews the current literature on proximal humerus fractures offering evidence for care pathways and management strategies from presentation to rehabilitation.

Percutaneous Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures

Introduction

The percutaneous approach to proximal humeral fixation emphasizes minimum dissection with the goal of preserving vascularity of the articular segments and thereby decreasing the risk of osteonecrosis.

Step 1: Preoperative Planning

Perform preoperative imaging to assess fracture displacement and comminution in order to confirm that percutaneous treatment is appropriate.

Step 2: Closed Fracture Reduction

Attempt closed fracture reduction prior to incision.

Step 3: Surgical Approach for Humeral Head and Shaft Reduction

Obtain anatomic humeral head reduction, insert terminally threaded pins, and check pin placement fluoroscopically.

Step 4: Tuberosity Fracture Reduction and Fixation of the Tuberosity Fragments

Fix the tuberosity fracture(s).

Step 5: Wound Closure

Cut the pins below the skin and irrigate and close the wounds.

Step 6: Postoperative Rehabilitation

Begin passive shoulder motion after pin removal, and initiate active motion at six weeks after pin removal.

Results

The results of this technique in twenty-seven patients with an average age of 58.8 years (range, forty-two to seventy-six years) at the time of injury were reported previously⁶.

Indications

Contraindications

Pitfalls & Challenges

Surgical management for displaced pediatric proximal humeral fractures: a cost analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to determine which of the following methods of fixation, percutaneous pinning (PP) or intramedullary nailing (IMN), was more cost-effective in the treatment of displaced pediatric proximal humeral fractures (PPHF).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of surgically treated PPHF over a 12-year period at a single institution was performed. A decision analysis model was constructed to compare three surgical strategies: IMN versus percutaneous pinning leaving the pins exposed (PPE) versus leaving the pins buried (PPB). Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed, assessing the cost-effectiveness of each technique when infection rates and cost of deep infections were varied.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients with displaced PPHF underwent surgical stabilization. A total of 35 cases were treated with IMN, 32 with PPE, and 17 with PPB. The age, sex, and preoperative fracture angulation were similar across all groups. A greater percentage of open reduction was seen in the IMN and PPB groups (p = 0.03), while a higher proportion of physeal injury was seen in the PPE group (p = 0.02). Surgical time and estimated blood loss was higher in the IMN group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). The decision analysis revealed that the PPE technique resulted in an average cost saving of $4,502 per patient compared to IMN and $2,066 compared to PPB. This strategy remained cost-effective even when the complication rates with exposed implants approached 55 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Leaving pins exposed after surgical fixation of PPHF is more cost-effective than either burying pins or using intramedullary fixation.

Comparison of modified Hackethal bundle nailing versus anterograde nailing for fixation of surgical neck fractures of the humerus: retrospective study of 105 cases

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary fixation of displaced surgical neck fractures of the humerus can be performed either by retrograde pinning or anterograde nailing. The goal of the current study was to compare the postoperative reduction and stability obtained with these two techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Intramedullary nailing will provide the best reduction and stabilization of these fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study that included patients with sub-tuberosity fractures with or without greater tuberosity fragment. These patients were treated either by retrograde Hackethal type pinning (group 1) or Telegraph anterograde nailing (group 2). To be included, patients needed to have A/P and lateral X-rays that had been taken before the surgery, immediately post-operative, between four and six weeks post-operative, and at the last follow-up. The outcomes were head angulation, translation and greater tuberosity position.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients (40 retrograde pinning and 65 anterograde nailing) with an average age of 69 years (18-97 years) were included. The pre-operative fracture displacement was similar between the two groups. After the surgery, the A/P head angulation had been corrected in 72.5% of patients in group 1 and 84% in group 2 (no significant difference). Translation was still present in 17.5% of patients in group 1 and 1.5% in group 2 (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, union was achieved without residual angulation on lateral X-rays in 71% of patients in group 1 and 88% in group 2 (P<0.05). The fractures had healed with residual translation is 19.5% of patients in group 1 and 3% in group 2 (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In cases of displaced surgical neck fractures with or without a greater tuberosity fragment, anterograde nailing provides better reduction and stability than retrograde pinning. However, fixation of the greater tuberosity fragment must be improved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective comparative study).

Avascular necrosis in proximal humeral fractures in patients treated with operative fixation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures are common lesions of the elderly, but there are no established treatment guidelines. A surgical treatment for comminuted and displaced fractures of the proximal humerus was developed and is still evolving. The aim of this study was to perform a quantitative review to evaluate the risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) in patients with proximal humeral fractures who were treated by operative fixation compared with conservative treatment.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (in Chinese), and Wanfang database (in Chinese) up to December 2013 to identify studies related to operative fixation and AVN in patients with proximal humeral fractures.

RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 291 patients (142 operative fixation cases and 149 conservative treatment cases) with proximal humeral fractures were considered in the meta-analysis. The overall meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of AVN between the two groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-6.11, p = 0.64]. The subgroup meta-analysis by study design (retrospective/prospective), sample size (≤40/>40), and ethnicity (European/Asian) demonstrated similar results. However, the subgroup analysis by specific operative approach (plate fixation/tension band wiring fixation/others) indicated that plate fixation was associated with a higher rate of AVN than conservative treatment (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.76, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Plate fixation was associated with a higher risk of AVN development than conservative treatment in patients with proximal humeral fractures.

Proximal humeral fractures: a review of current concepts

The majority of proximal humerus fractures are sustained via low energy falls in the elderly population. These patients can attain an acceptable level of function via non-operative treatment. There is yet to be a clear consensus on treatment options suitable for those that fall outside of this majority group. Open reduction internal fixation, intra medullary nailing and arthroplasty surgery have all been used to varying effects. Good results are achievable if complications such as mal-union, non-union and avascular necrosis can be avoided. This review aims to clarify the options available to the current day trauma surgeon.

Displaced fragility fractures of proximal humerus in elderly patients affected by severe comorbidities: percutaneous fixation and conservative treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Proximal humerus is a common site of fracture in elderly patients, mainly related to bone fragility. Comorbidities are often present in these patients and may limit the surgical options. Not or minimal invasive treatments are commonly indicated however with variable results. The authors present their experience with conservative approach and percutaneous fixation by K-wires, focusing on their indications and main advantages on this population: mini-invasivity, acceptable reduction and recovery, and low costs.

METHODS

A study group of 51 consecutive patients with a mean age of 75.5 and affected by severe comorbidities (mainly cardiac, circulatory, pneumologic, neurologic, metabolic, and nephrologic pathologies) were evaluated clinically (ASA score, VAS, muscular strength, Constant-Murley score), and with radiologic analysis: 28 patients were treated by percutaneous fixation, while 23 subjects were treated conservatively.

RESULTS

Fractures treated by K-wires fixation healed after a mean interval of 8.2 weeks in all fractures but one, with improvements in mean Constant-Murley score (up to 80.6 points), in mean VAS (2.9), in muscular strength (4.1), and in range of motion. Fractures treated by brace healed in a mean time of 10.2 weeks. Mean Constant-Murley score improved to 76.4 points, VAS to 3.0, muscular strength to 3.8 points, and significant recovery of range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the study confirm that both percutaneous fixation and conservative treatment may represent suitable options for proximal humerus fragility fractures in elderly patients, not candidated to open surgery for severe associated comorbidities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (case series study).

Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries, especially among older osteoporotic women. Restoration of function requires a thorough understanding of the neurovascular, musculotendinous, and bony anatomy. This paper addresses the relevant anatomy and highlights various management options, including indication for arthroplasty. In the vast majority of cases, proximal humerus fractures may be treated nonoperatively. In the case of displaced fractures, when surgical intervention may be pursued, numerous constructs have been investigated. Of these, the proximal humerus locking plate is the most widely used. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for comminuted 4-part fractures, head-split fractures, or fractures with significant underlying arthritic changes. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is reserved for patients with a deficient rotator cuff, or highly comminuted tuberosities.

Proximal humerus fractures

Proximal humeral fractures are extremely common injuries, and are one of the true osteoporotic fractures. Most fractures can be effectively treated nonoperatively, as the rich vascularity and broad cancellous surfaces impart a high propensity for healing. Additionally, many fracture patterns result in adequate bone contact and minimal displacement with acceptable alignment. Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced fractures can improve outcomes, depending on the pre-injury functional status of the patient. If operative treatment is selected, unique treatment challenges must be overcome, including obtaining and maintaining reduction of small bone fragments with strong muscle forces, often in osteoporotic bone. Many options are feasible, including plates, nails, sutures, and other novel devices. Locking plates are the most common device used, but technical detail is critical to minimize the risk of implant failure, loss of reduction, and reoperation.

The importance of inferomedial support in the hot air balloon technique for treatment of 3-part proximal humeral fractures

HYPOTHESIS

Inferomedial support may affect the results of the hot air balloon technique for the treatment of displaced, 3-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with displaced, 3-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with the hot air balloon technique between 1995 and 2007 were included in the study. All patients were classified into 4 subgroups based on the presence or absence of medial buttress restoration and inferomedial screw insertion (R+, restored with inferomedial screw; R-, restored without inferomedial screw; NR+, non-restored with inferomedial screw; and NR-, non-restored without inferomedial screw). Assessment of radiologic and clinical outcome among subgroups was based on evaluation of neck-shaft angle, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Neer score.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 65 ± 29.7 months. The change in the neck-shaft angle in the R+, R-, NR+, and NR- groups was 3°, 2°, 3°, and 11°, respectively. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores in the R+, R-, NR+, and NR- groups were 91 ± 4.8, 86 ± 5.4, 85 ± 1.9, and 77 ± 5.8, respectively. The mean Neer scores in the R+, R-, NR+, and NR- groups were 92 ± 4.3, 88 ± 4.0, 87 ± 2.1, and 76 ± 8.2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial buttress restoration and inferomedial screw insertion affect bone-nail construct stability and clinical outcomes.

Intermediate outcomes following percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Mini-open reduction and percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures historically results in good outcomes and a low prevalence of osteonecrosis reported with short-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to determine the midterm results of our multicenter case series of proximal humeral fractures treated with percutaneous fixation.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2006, thirty-nine patients were treated with percutaneous reduction and fixation for proximal humeral fractures at three tertiary shoulder referral centers. Twenty-seven of these patients were available for intermediate follow-up at a minimum of three years (mean, eighty-four months; range, thirty-seven to 128 months) after surgery; the follow-up examination included use of subjective outcome measures and radiographic analysis to identify osteonecrosis and posttraumatic osteoarthritis on radiographs.

RESULTS

Osteonecrosis was detected in seven (26%) of the total group of twenty-seven patients at a mean of fifty months (range, eleven to 101 months) after the date of percutaneous fixation. Osteonecrosis was observed in five (50%) of the ten patients who had four-part fractures, two (17%) of the twelve patients who had three-part fractures, and none (0%) of the five patients who had two-part fractures. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis, including osteonecrosis, was present on radiographs in ten (37%) of the total group of twenty-seven patients. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis was observed in six (60%) of the ten patients who had four-part fractures, four (33%) of the twelve patients who had three-part fractures, and none (0%) of the five patients who had two-part fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermediate follow-up of patients with percutaneously treated proximal humeral fractures demonstrates an increased prevalence of osteonecrosis and posttraumatic osteoarthritis over time, with some patients with these complications presenting as late as eight years postoperatively. Development of osteonecrosis did not have a universally negative impact on subjective outcome scores.

Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture with external fixator

BACKGROUND

The treatment of unstable displaced proximal humeral fractures remains challenging and controversial. Reports about the application of a mini-external fixator in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures are rare. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures by closed reduction and external fixation with application of a mini-external fixator.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were surgically treated by closed reduction and external fixation with mini-external fixators at our institute between March 2007 and June 2009. There were 22 men and 10 women who had a mean age of 56 years (range, 23-81 years). The Neer scoring system related to pain, function, and range of motion was used to assess the outcome.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed up at an mean of 18 months (range, 13-27 months). The duration of surgery was 29 ± 12 minutes. The accumulative fluoroscopy time was 12 ± 3.5 exposures. The mean time of fracture union was 13 ± 3.6 weeks. The mean Neer score was 83.2 ± 12.5 points at final follow-up. The incidence of excellent and good results was 81%. Two patients had loosening of the pins. One patient had a collapsed humeral head. There was no infection and impingement.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures with a mini-external fixator is characterized by minimal invasion, a shorter duration of surgery, and easy manipulation, making application of the mini-external fixator a good option for some selected patients.

Is it worth fixing proximal humeral fractures at increased vascular risk?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate fixation of proximal humeral fractures by anterograde nailing, in terms of fracture reduction, bone healing; osteonecrosis; functional consequences of osteonecrosis and malunion.

DESIGN

Prospective, consecutive, multicenter based.

SETTING

Academic Trauma Centers; approval was received from the ethics committee of the institutions involved in the study.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled prospectively, with 31 3-part and 20 4-part displaced fractures (head displacement greater than 45°, tuberosity-head gap greater than 10mm, diaphyseal gap greater than 10mm). A Telegraph™ nail (FH Orthopedics, Heimsbrunn, France) was the fixation device used, introduced through a superolateral transdeltoid approach under fluoroscopic guidance. The assessment included Simple Shoulder Test, absolute Constant score, X-rays every 3 months and CT-scan at final evaluation. Twelve patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Immediate complications included secondary displacement in four patients.

RESULTS

There were no infections, no deltoid muscle or axillary nerve damage, and all the fractures united. After a mean follow-up of 24.1 months, malunion was observed in 29% of the remaining 38 patients and osteonecrosis in 32%. Both complications were more frequent and extensive in patients with 4-part fractures. The osteonecrosis area influenced the Constant score, which was 55.8 points when the area was less than 30%, 50.6 points between 30 and 50%, and 38 points when larger than 50%. Head malunion affected the Simple Shoulder Test and the Constant score.

CONCLUSION

Nailing may thus be recommended for 3-part fractures, because osteonecrosis is less frequent, more focused, and better tolerated in this sub-group. In contrast, antegrade nailing was not more beneficial than other internal fixation techniques for preventing osteonecrosis or head malunion in patients with 4-part fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: prospective study.

Operative treatment of isolated greater tuberosity fractures: retrospective review of clinical and functional outcomes

Displaced isolated greater tuberosity fractures are rare injuries that require operative treatment to optimize rotator cuff function and prevent painful subacromial impingement. A lack of consensus exists regarding ideal management of these injuries because of the paucity of literature on the subject.The outcomes of 17 patients treated with open (n=15) or arthroscopic (n=2) fixation at the authors' institution between 2001 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and overall patient satisfaction were recorded at final follow-up. At a mean of 5.2 years (range 1.5-9.7 years), average postoperative active forward elevation was 150.3° (range, 60°-180°), ASES score was 82.9 (range, 46.7-100), and VAS score was 1.4 (range, 0-5). According to Neer's criteria, the overall outcome was excellent in 11 (65%) patients, satisfactory in 5 (29%) patients, and unsatisfactory in 1 (6%) patient. Final postoperative radiographs were available for 15 patients at a mean of 6.64 months. Radiographic union with near-anatomic position of the greater tuberosity was achieved in 13 (87%) of 15 patients. The presence of rotator cuff and rotator interval tears requiring repair, history of dislocation, age 60 years or older, and delayed time to surgery ≥ 10 days did not significantly (P>.05) influence the patients' final active forward elevation and ASES scores.Favorable patient outcomes can be achieved when fractures with >5 mm of displacement are treated with anatomic reduction and secure fixation. For a specific injury, the ideal surgical approach and method of fixation is dictated by patient characteristics and fracture pattern.

Technique of Kirschner wire reduction and fixation of displaced two-part valgus angulated proximal humerus fractures at the surgical neck

This article describes the technique of closed reduction with percutaneous fixation using Kirschner wires in helping the reduction of two-part valgus angulated and displaced proximal humerus fractures at the surgical neck. Traditional open reduction may lead to more accurate anatomic reduction; however, extensive tissue dissection increases the risk of avascular necrosis. Thus, closed reduction of unstable fracture mostly required forceful reduction maneuvers, which can harm the vascular supply and increase hematoma formation. Reduction of the fractured sides can easily be performed by engaging Kirschner -wires with a joystick method and fixation can be secured by using threaded pins. Thirty-six consecutive patients with displaced, two-part, valgus-angulated proximal humerus fractures at the surgical neck were treated by this method. The patients were followed for an average of 38 months. All fractures healed. According to the Constant scoring system, 21 patients (58%) had excellent, 9 patients (25%) had good, and 6 patients (17%) had fair results. The technique of closed reduction with a joystick method and percutaneous fixation is regarded as a reasonable treatment alternative in displaced two-part valgus angulated proximal humerus fracture.

Clinical outcome and complications using a polyaxial locking plate in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. A reliable system?

INTRODUCTION

The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures (ORIF) is a perpetual challenge to the surgeon. For this reason, the principle of polyaxiality was developed to provide an improved primary stability of the fracture through better anchorage of the screws, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to present clinical results with the polyaxial locking plate in the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in order to determine whether the technique of polyaxiality leads to better functional outcome and lower complication rates in comparison to monoaxial plates in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically with the polyaxial locking Suture Plate™ (Arthrex(®)) between 03/2007 and 06/2009. Fifty-two of the patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 12.1) were included in a radiographical and clinical examination using the Constant score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH).

RESULTS

The follow-up examinations were on average 13.9 ± 4.5 months (10-27 months) after surgical treatment. The mean CS of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.7 points, the age- and gender-related CS was 90.9% ± 20.0% and the mean DASH score was 23.8 ± 19.8 points for the injured side. The patients with a nearly anatomical reduction of their fracture (n = 13) reached a significantly higher CS (75.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.004) and DASH-score (13.6 ± 11.6; p = 0.043) and none of these patients had a complication. The complications were identified in 12 (23.1%) cases, 5 of which involved loss of reduction. All of these 5 cases were lacking of initial medial column support and 4 of which were type C2.3 AO-Classification.

CONCLUSION

The data show that the combination of angular stability with the possibility of variable polyaxial screw direction is a good concept for reduction and fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures, but anatomical reduction and medial support remain important preconditions for a good outcome. However, a significantly lower rate of complications or better clinical outcome than that reported in the literature could not be found.

Percutaneous pinning of three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients in poor general condition: MIROS® versus traditional pinning

PURPOSE

Elderly subjects often have fractures of the proximal humerus, which may be difficult to manage in patients in poor general condition. The MIROS is a new percutaneous pinning device allowing correction of angular displacement and stable fixation of fracture fragments. We evaluated the results of percutaneous fixation of three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus of patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status three or four treated either with MIROS or traditional percutaneous pinning (TPP).

METHODS

A total of 31 patients treated with MIROS and 27 undergoing TPP were enrolled in the study. Pre-operatively anteroposterior and transthoracic or axillary radiographs were obtained in all cases and computed tomography scans in patients with the most complex fractures. Follow-up evaluations were carried out at three, six, 12 and 16 weeks, and six months, one year and two years postoperatively, using the Constant Score (CS) and subjective shoulder value (SSV) methods.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 52 could be evaluated at all follow-ups. In both three- or four-part fractures there were significantly higher CS and SSV scores in the MIROS compared to the TPP group at all the late follow-ups. Lower rates of deep infection, pin tract infection and pin mobilisation were found in the MIROS group (p < 0.001). In both groups there was a significant association between the final result (CS) and either the type of fracture or complications (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MIROS resulted in better clinical results and less complications than TPP in elderly patients. This method, however, may not be indicated for younger patients in good general condition.

Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported high failures rates after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Loss of reduction and screw cut-out are the most common reasons for revision surgery. Several risk factors for failure have been described in the literature. The aim of the present study was to assess risk factors for failure after surgical fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures in a multivariate setup.

METHODS

Two different surgical techniques (PHILOS locking plate and Humerusblock) were used. In the PHILOS group, every kind of postoperative relative movement between the implant and the humeral head or shaft was defined as failure. In the Humerusblock group, postoperative movement between the humeral head and the shaft in terms of angulation or translational displacement was defined as failure. The following parameters were assessed: age, gender, cancellous bone mineral density (BMD) of the humeral head, fracture type, medial metaphyseal comminution, medial metaphyseal head extension, initial angulation of the humeral head in the frontal plane, initial anteversion of the humeral head, medial hinge displacement, maximum displacement of the tuberosities with respect to the head, surgical technique, anatomic reconstruction and restoration of the medial cortical support.

RESULTS

The following parameters were found to have a significant influence on the failure rate: age, local BMD, anatomic reduction, and restoration of the medial cortical support. The failure rate significantly increased with the number of risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative assessment of the local BMD and the patients' biological age as well as intraoperative anatomic reduction and restoration of the medial cortical support are the essentials for successful surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Multifragmentary fracture patterns in old patients with low local BMD are prone for fixation failure. If the surgeon is not able to achieve anatomic reduction and restoration of the medial cortical support intraoperatively in this situation, adjustments such as augmentation or primary arthroplasty should be considered.

Modern perspectives of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures

Recent innovations have greatly increased the range of proximal humeral fractures that are amenable to open reduction and plate fixation.The optimum technique for some of the more complex fracture patterns is not yet fully refined.This article aims to describe the recent advances in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures by open reduction and locking plate fixation, focusing particularly on the indications for surgery, the operative techniques, and the expected outcomes after treatment.

Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous pin fixation of pediatric proximal humerus fractures: a comparison of complications and early radiographic results

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is often advocated for unstable or severely displaced proximal humerus fractures in older children. The purpose of this study is to compare the early radiographic results and complications of 2 common methods of internal fixation, percutaneous pinning (PP), and flexible intramedullary nailing (IMN), used to treat these fractures.

METHODS

Fifty skeletally immature patients who underwent surgical reduction and PP or IMN of proximal humerus fractures between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed. Radiographs were assessed for maximum angular deformity and Neer-Horowitz classification on preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs. t test, χ, Wilcoxon, and Cochran-Armitage trend test analyses were used to determine statistical significance. Average age at injury was 13.7 years with average follow-up of 9 months.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, side of injury, reduction method, preoperative Neer-Horowitz classification or preoperative maximum angulation between the PP and IMN groups. Patients treated with both PP and IMN achieved significant improvements in both radiographic angulation and Neer-Horowitz classification. Patients treated with IMN had a slightly lower average angulation on final radiographs. Patients treated with IMN had higher average estimated blood losses (EBLs) and longer surgical times than patients treated with PP. The complication rate was higher in the PP group than in the IMN group. There were no differences in rates of loss of reduction. More patients in the IMN group underwent a second surgical procedure for implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IMN and PP techniques are effective at stabilizing severely displaced proximal humerus fractures in the older pediatric population. IMN has the advantage of fewer complications but involves longer surgeries, increased EBL, and a second surgery for implant removal. PP has shorter surgeries, decreased EBL, and lesser need for operative implant removal, though complication rates are higher. Ultimately both patient and surgeon factors should be used to determine which treatment is best in a given situation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III: retrospective comparative study.

Results of proximal humeral locked plating with supplemental suture fixation of rotator cuff

HYPOTHESIS

This study retrospectively reports the results of 81 patients with proximal humeral fractures that were treated operatively. We hypothesized that treatment of these injuries through a standardized technique of precountored locked plating and supplemental tension band suture fixation would result in improved clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Clinical assessment was performed postoperatively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and active range of motion measurements. Radiographic parameters assessed included Neer fracture pattern, fracture union, hardware failure, the presence of avascular necrosis, and medial calcar length and stability. Fractures were classified as 4-part in 14 (17%), 3-part in 41 (51%), and 2-part in 26 (32%).

RESULTS

The average ASES score was 80 (range, 27-100). The final range of motion averaged 131° of anterior elevation and 41° of external rotation. Fracture union was achieved in all patients, and there were no tuberosity failures. Complications included intraarticular screw penetration in 3 (3.7%) and avascular necrosis in 5 (6.2%).

DISCUSSION

Locked plating and supplemental tension band fixation can lead to fracture union and favorable outcomes. Restoration of the medial calcar and supplemental suture fixation may decrease the incidence of hardware-related complications.

Clinical longer-term results after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate (PHILOS)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the subjective and objective longer-term outcomes after fracture fixation with the Proximal Humerus InterLocking OSteosynthesis (PHILOS) plate.

DESIGN

Minimum 4-year follow-up of a primary prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single university trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four consecutively collected patients fulfilled the study criteria. Seven patients (11%) were lost to follow-up, resulting in 57 patients (65 ± 14 years).

INTERVENTION

Open reduction and internal fixation with the PHILOS® plate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Standardized follow-up including functional outcome instruments (eg, Constant Murley score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), rate of complications, and secondary surgeries at 6, 12, and no less than 48 months (uni- and multivariate analysis; P < 0.05).

RESULTS

At the 4- to 6-year follow-up (median 5 years postinjury), patients on average achieved an 87% range of motion of the injured compared with the uninjured shoulder (eg, 133° ± 40° versus 152° ± 26° abduction). Objective and subjective outcome improved significantly during the overall follow-up, most of all in reoperated and younger patients (65 years and younger) and within the first postinjury year. We observed an overall reoperation rate of 29% and 10 patients (17.5%) demonstrated an insufficient result resulting from pain (greater than 3 visual analog scale) or restricted abduction (less than 90°) at longer-term follow-up. First, the need for revision surgery and, second, increasing age were found to be the most predictive factors for unsatisfactory results.

CONCLUSIONS

Fracture fixation with the PHILOS showed good to excellent longer-term results in three fourths of patients with outcome partially still improving after the first postoperative year.

Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes

Most proximal humeral fractures are stable injuries of the ageing population, and can be successfully treated non-operatively. The management of the smaller number of more complex displaced fractures is more controversial and new fixation techniques have greatly increased the range of fractures that may benefit from surgery. This article explores current concepts in the classification and clinical aspects of these injuries, reviewing the indications, innovations and outcomes for the most common methods of treatment.

Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures

Fractures of the proximal humerus occur frequently, and are primarily insufficiency fractures that occur in the elderly. Thorough clinical evaluation is essential in identifying associated neurovascular injury, which warrants emergent surgical referral. Good quality radiographs remain a necessary diagnostic tool in the evaluation of proximal humerus injuries. An appreciation of the relevant anatomy and predictable patterns of deformation aid in understanding the basic classification of proximal humerus fractures. Most of these fractures are minimally displaced and can be treated nonoperatively with acceptable clinical outcomes. Familiarity with the basic surgical treatment modalities is helpful to physicians involved in the pre- and postoperative management. Significantly displaced proximal humerus fractures are typically treated with surgical reduction and internal fixation. Complex fractures in the elderly and fracture dislocations are indications for humeral head prosthetic replacement. Proximal humerus fractures are strongly associated with decreased bone mineral density and future fracture risk, and should prompt a referral for medical management of osteoporosis.

Management of upper extremity injuries in obese patients

Upper extremity injuries are more prevalent in obese people than in nonobese people after low-energy falls. Because splinting and casting are inefficient methods of stabilization in the setting of obesity, internal fixation provides stability for mobilization and realignment. Morbid obesity adversely affects positioning, surgical exposures, and complications associated with operative fixation. Avoiding short cuts and complications, morbidly obese patients should be able to return to normal functioning.

Intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of 28 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures.

METHODS

24 women and 4 men aged 38 to 87 (mean, 65) years underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures. 17 (61%) of them were aged >70 years. Fractures were classified into 2-part (n = 8), 3-part (n = 17), and 4-part (n = 3), and corresponded to AO 11 A3 (n = 8), B1 (n = 3), B2 (n = 9), and C2 (n = 8) types. The Constant and Oxford scores were assessed at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients had bone union except for one who had tuberosity failure. 23 (82%) patients had satisfactory-to-excellent and 5 had poor Constant scores; outcomes were worse with more complex fractures. 20 (71%) patients had satisfactory Oxford scores. Seven (25%) patients had impingement of a nail tip. Other complications included avascular necrosis (n = 1), proximal locking screw back-out (n = 1), and screw penetration into the joint (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing provides a stable fixation with minimal soft tissue dissection for displaced proximal humeral fractures. It enables early mobilisation and functional recovery.

Elastic stabilisation of proximal humeral fractures with a new percutaneous angular stable fixation device (ButtonFix(®)): a preliminary report

INTRODUCTION

The ButtonFix(®) system represents a new angular stable percutaneous fixation device for stabilisation of fractures of the proximal humerus. The purpose of this study was to present a preliminary report of the radiological and clinical outcome after minimally invasive stabilisation of selected proximal humerus fractures with the ButtonFix(®).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with fractures of the proximal humerus were treated in our department with the ButtonFix(®) system. The mean final follow-up was performed 19 months postoperatively. Follow-up included assessment of postoperative reposition, range of motion, the DASH score, the Constant-Murley score, and the Short Form 36 (SF36).

RESULTS

Twelve patients showed anatomical head-to-shaft angles, four revealed minor valgus replacement, and one minor varus replacement. In one patient unplanned revision surgery was necessary due to early secondary fracture dislocation requiring ORIF with an angular stable form plate. Implant removal was performed after 6 weeks in all patients. At the final follow-up, mean range of motion was: flexion 135°, extension 45°, abduction 142°, internal rotation 51°, and external rotation 62°. The mean Constant-Murley score was 70. The mean DASH score was 26 points and the average SF36 score was 76 points. One patient showed radiological signs of avascular necrosis.

CONCLUSION

The ButtonFix(®) system represents a valuable tool in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with results indicating fewer complications compared to prior percutaneous fixation devices. Moreover, the ButtonFix(®) seems to be able to maintain reduction even in elderly patients with potentially reduced bone mass.