Use of a cast compared with a functional ankle brace after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. A prospective, randomized study

Weight-bearing timing after the operative management of ankle fractures: Single center audit and critical appraisal of literature

The postoperative weight-bearing policy following internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures varies greatly and is largely surgeon-dependent. While early weight-bearing is favoured for its superior functional and economic outcomes, late weight-bearing may be safer initially. However, consensus on the preferred treatment protocol is lacking. We audited practices at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium, comparing them to existing literature to establish an updated protocol. In a retrospective study of 236 patients with unstable ankle fractures, we compared outcomes between early (EWB) and late weight-bearing (LWB) strategies, with or without braces and/or vacuum casts. Most patients followed a LWB protocol, while EWB was reserved for younger, lower BMI individuals. The difference in brace or vacuum cast usage was insignificant. All open fractures followed a LWB protocol. No disparities in union rates, complications, or length of stay were found between EWB and LWB. Surgical management cost €6,419 (6,921 US $) on average, with length of stay being the main cost driver. Total healthcare costs did not differ significantly between EWB and LWB. FRI was revealed in 6 cases, (1 [4%] vs. 5 [2.5%], EWB vs. LWB respectively, P=0.922) In conclusion, while no significant differences in outcomes were observed between EWB and LWB rehabilitation, differences in group characteristics may have influenced these findings. Despite limited EWB cases, it appears safe for younger patients with low BMI. Vacuum casts and braces aid in EWB. Reducing length of stay, rather than restricting orthotic use, may help control healthcare costs.

Calcaneal distraction vs. cast immobilization for the preoperative treatment of patients with Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures: a case-control study

Introduction

Ankle fractures require temporary fixation to allow swelling to subside prior to surgery; this is typically achieved using calcaneal distraction or cast immobilization. We compared the results of these methods in the treatment of Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the data of 86 patients with Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures, of whom 40 underwent calcaneal distraction and 46 underwent cast immobilization. Clinical measures including preoperative detumescence time, daily swelling value, skin condition, and pain, SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) score and ankle scores were compared between the two groups.

Results

Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. Calcaneal distraction resulted in a lower preoperative detumescence time (6.22 ± 0.64 vs. 8.94 ± 0.82 days) and lower daily swelling values compared with cast immobilization, leading to a lower skin necrosis rate. Resting pain scores were significantly lower in the calcaneal distraction group than in the cast immobilization group at various postoperative time points (P < 0.05). Ankle function scores were higher in the calcaneal distraction group than in the cast immobilization group at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), indicating improved outcomes. Additionally, the SF-36 quality of life scores of patients undergoing calcaneal distraction were notably superior to those in the cast immobilization group.

Discussion

Calcaneal distraction is superior to cast immobilization in reducing soft tissue swelling, alleviating pain, and enhancing ankle function recovery in patients with Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures. Early calcaneal distraction upon hospital admission is recommended to optimize surgical outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of Rehabilitation Strategies Following Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review

Considering various forms of immobilization that enable early weight-bearing or exercise initiation, rehabilitation following an ankle fracture can start shortly after the fracture has been repaired. Alternatively, after the period of immobility, physical or manual therapy may be used to begin rehabilitation. This systematic review aimed to compare different rehabilitation strategies after ankle fracture surgery. Four different databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Google Scholar) were used to retrieve the relevant data using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials involving people undergoing every type of rehabilitation therapy following an ankle fracture surgery were taken into consideration. The main result was a limitation in activities. Adverse events and impairments were instances of such secondary outcomes. A total of 31 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. The use of exercise and a removable form of immobilization during the immobilization phase to enhance activity limitation is supported by very little evidence. The patient's capacity to adhere to this treatment plan is crucial due to the possible higher risk. To support the available data, more carefully planned and sufficiently powered clinical trials must be conducted.

To cast or not to cast? Postoperative care of ankle fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Postoperative care of ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a debated topic. A meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials was conducted with the aim of comparing early mobilization and weightbearing to traditional postoperative protocols. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized clinical trials were included. Data about clinical outcome, time to return to work and complications were extracted and summarized. Meta-analyses were performed. Twenty studies for a total of 1328 patients were included. Early mobilization was compared to immobilization in 724 patients: the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of short- and long-term clinical outcome (p = 0.08 and p = 0.41, respectively). However, early mobilization resulted to be significantly associated with faster return to work (p = 0.047). Early weightbearing was compared to nonweightbearing in 1088 patients. While the clinical difference between the two groups was not significant at short term (p = 0.08), it was significant at long term (p = 0.002). No other significant differences, in particular regarding complications, were highlighted between different groups. Early motion, early weightbearing and traditional postoperative protocols are all safe strategies after ORIF for unstable ankle fractures. Early mobilization is significantly associated with faster return to work and early weightbearing improves long term clinical outcome.Level of evidence: I.

Early Versus Delayed Weight Bearing and Mobilization After Ankle Fracture Fixation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The purpose of this review was to determine whether there is a benefit to early weight bearing or mobilization in surgically treated ankle fractures. All randomized controlled trials that analyzed early vs delayed weight bearing and/or mobilization after an ankle surgery were included. The primary outcome measure was the pooled Olerud Molander Ankle Score 1 year postoperatively. No significant differences in ankle function were found at 1 year postoperatively between early and delayed weight bearing and mobilization. The 12-week results demonstrated superior early ankle function scores for patients who had early weight bearing. Patients who had early mobilization were at increased risk for postoperative complications. In surgically treated ankle fractures, early weight bearing resulted in improved short-term ankle function scores. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):71-78.].

Early Weight-bearing Following Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures Without Trans-syndesmotic Fixation Is Safe and Improves Short-term Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to ascertain outcome differences after fixation of unstable rotational ankle fractures allowed to weight-bear 2 weeks postoperatively compared with 6 weeks.

METHODS

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study.

SETTING

Academic medical center; Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with unstable ankle fractures (OTA/AO:44A-C) undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were enrolled. Patients requiring trans-syndesmotic fixation were excluded. Two surgeons allowed weight-bearing at 2 weeks postoperatively (early weight-bearing [EWB] cohort). Two other surgeons instructed standard non-weight-bearing until 6 weeks postoperatively (non-weight-bearing cohort).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The main outcome measures included the Olerud-Molander questionnaire, the SF-36 questionnaire, and visual analog scale at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and complications, return to work, range of ankle motion, and reoperations at 12 months were compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were included. The 2 cohorts did not differ in demographics or preinjury scores ( P > 0.05). Six weeks postoperatively, EWB patients had improved functional outcomes as measured by the Olerud-Molander and SF-36 questionnaires. Early weight-bearing patients also had better visual analog scale scores (standardized mean difference -0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27 to -0.70, P < 0.05) and a greater proportion returning to full capacity work at 6 weeks (odds ratio = 3.42, 95% CI, 1.08-13.07, P < 0.05). One year postoperatively, EWB patients had improved pain measured by SF-36 (standardized mean difference 6.25, 95% CI, 5.59-6.92, P < 0.01) and visual analog scale scores (standardized mean difference -0.05, 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.23, P < 0.01). There were no differences in complications or reoperation at 12 months ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EWB patients had improved early function, final pain scores, and earlier return to work, without an increased complication rate compared with those kept non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Immediate Unprotected Weightbearing vs 2 Weeks Nonweightbearing After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Postoperative care protocols for ankle fracture surgery remain controversial with variability among care providers. This prospective controlled trial compared 12-week postoperative outcomes for immediate unprotected weightbearing (IMWB) vs nonweightbearing (NWB) for 2 weeks in a splint followed by weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) in a boot after surgical fixation of selected low-energy ankle fractures without superior articular involvement.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients undergoing surgical fixation of ankle fractures at a single level 1 trauma center were recruited according to specific criteria and enrolled by presentation date. The first 43 eligible patients were allocated to the control group, with NWB in a splint for 2 weeks followed by WBAT in a walker boot. The next 44 patients recruited were allocated to the IMWB group. The primary outcome was the Olerud-Molander score (OMAS). Secondary outcome measures included the Euroquol-5D (EQ5D) score and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) scores, ankle range of motion (ROM), wound complications, time to return to work, radiograph measurements, and fracture reduction loss. In this perioperative-focused study, we collected data on patients until 12 weeks postoperation.

RESULTS

The IMWB group had 5 superficial wound complications vs 1 in the control group. At 12 weeks, we found no difference in OMAS, EQ5D, WPAI:SHP scores, ROM, time to return to work, or radiographic measurements.

CONCLUSION

In this short-term and relatively small prospective trial, we found more wound complications among patients treated with immediate unprotected weightbearing compared with patients treated with 2 weeks of NWB followed by protected weightbearing. Given the low incidence and small sample size, we do not know if these observed findings are generalizable. However, we also found no difference in functional outcomes at 12 weeks postoperation between these 2 groups. In light of that, we do not recommend IMWB after open reduction internal fixation of low-energy ankle fractures with plate and/or screw fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective controlled trial.

Use of removable support boot versus cast for early mobilisation after ankle fracture surgery: cost-effectiveness analysis and qualitative findings of the Ankle Recovery Trial (ART)

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of using a removable boot versus a cast following ankle fracture from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services (NHS+PSS) payer and societal perspectives and explore the impact of both treatments on participants' activities of daily living.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analyses and qualitative interviews performed alongside a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Eight UK NHS secondary care trusts.

PARTICIPANTS

243 participants (60.5% female, on average 48.2 years of age (SD 16.4)) with ankle fracture. Qualitative interviews with 16 participants. Interventions removable air boot versus plaster cast 2 weeks after surgery weight bearing as able with group-specific exercises.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, costs and incremental net monetary benefit statistics measured 12 weeks after surgery, for a society willing-to-pay £20 000 per QALY.

RESULTS

Care in the boot group cost, on average, £88 (95% CI £22 to £155) per patient more than in the plaster group from the NHS+PSS perspective. When including all societal costs, the boot saved, on average, £676 per patient (95% CI -£337 to £1689). Although there was no evidence of a QALY difference between the groups (-0.0020 (95% CI -0.0067 to 0.0026)), the qualitative findings suggest participants felt the boot enhanced their quality of life. Patients in the boot felt more independent and empowered to take on family responsibilities and social activities.

CONCLUSIONS

While the removable boot is slightly more expensive than plaster cast for the NHS+PSS payer at 12 weeks after surgery, it reduces productivity losses and the need for informal care while empowering patients. Given that differences in QALYs and costs to the NHS are small, the decision to use a boot or plaster following ankle surgery could be left to patients' and clinicians' preferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN15497399, South Central-Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee (reference 14/SC/1409).

The effect of massage on the plantar flexor muscles during the fixation period in postoperative patients with an ankle fracture

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fractures are one of the most common lower extremity fractures. After surgery, the ankle joint is often immobilized in a plantar flexion position, and there have been many reported cases of limited ankle joint range of motion. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of regular massage interventions on ankle joint range of motion after removal of fixation.

METHODS

The massage group comprised 30 patients who had sustained an ankle fracture and had undergone surgical fixation, physical therapy, and massage between November 2020 and March 2022. These subjects received a 3-min massage twice daily, five times a week. The control group consisted of 38 patients who had sustained an ankle fracture between January 2015 and September 2020 and had undergone surgical fixation as well as regular physical therapy.

RESULTS

The respective ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ranges of motion after cast removal were 2.50 ± 7.2° and 42.3 ± 7.2° in the massage group and -8.62 ± 2.9° and 34.8 ± 8.3° in the control group. An unpaired t-test showed that the ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ranges of motion in the massage group were significantly greater than those in the control group (p = 0.036 and p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that regular 3-min massage interventions of the plantar flexors could prevent the progression of a range of motion limitations in postoperative patients with an ankle fracture more effectively than regular physical therapy alone.

Results of prophylactic simple fasciocutaneous advancement in the initial management of acute ankle fractures with high risk of operative wound complication

Ankle fracture is the third most prevalent fracture in older adults. Wound dehiscence is the most frequent complication. Our objective is to determine the operative wound complication rate in patients with unstable ankle fracture in whom a prophylactic simple fasciocutaneous advancement was used.

METHODS

Prospective registry of patients with unstable ankle fracture, in whom a prophylactic fasciocutaneous advancement was performed between August 2020 and July 2021. Demographic variables, time spent in performing the flap, cost of osteosynthesis, minor and major complications of the surgical wound, readmission or reoperation were registered.

RESULTS

42 older adults with ankle fracture were included. Median age 69 (60-94). 31% diabetics and 21.5% active smokers. A 40% trimalleolar fracture pattern. There were 7% of superficial complications of the surgical wound. No major complications, no reoperations.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic fasciocutaneous advancement at the beginning of traumatological surgery is technically simple, reproducible, cheap and with low complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Early Functional Rehabilitation in Foot and Ankle Surgery

The traditional postoperative management of common foot and ankle procedures has involved a prolonged period of immobilization and nonweight bearing. The concern was loss of correction and fixation failure. However, it has been shown that a prolonged period of nonweight bearing can predispose patients possible deep vein thrombosis, disuse osteopenia, cardiovascular complications, and generalized deconditioning. The authors' institution has published studies reviewing the efficacy of early weight bearing after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis, modified Lapidus bunionectomy, and open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. This article highlights the literature and rationale supporting the safety of early weight-bearing protocols.

Splint versus no splint after ankle fracture fixation; Results from the multi-centre post-operative ankle splint trial (PAST)

BACKGROUND

There is considerable variation in the rehabilitation of ankle fractures. Ankle fractures treated surgically are often immobilized or splinted in the early post-operative period, despite the lack of robust evidence supporting this intervention. Thus, this randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the anecdote that splinting reduces pain and oedema.

METHODS

A prospective multi-centre randomized controlled trial was performed in three trauma centres. Eligible patients were over 18 years of age that have sustained an isolated unilateral ankle fracture requiring surgical intervention. Patients were randomized to two groups receiving either; a plaster of Paris posterior back-slab or compressive bandage dressing. The post-operative rehabilitation protocol was standardized across both groups. Baseline demographics and fracture characteristics and classifications were analysed. Primary outcomes included; oedema measured by the figure-of-eight-20 technique and pain at multiple time points. Secondary outcomes included; the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, satisfaction, unplanned emergency room (ER) visits and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 104 comparable participants were included; 54 in the non-splint group and 50 in the splint group. There was no significance difference in ankle oedema, ankle oedema compared to contralateral ankle and pain scores between the two groups (P = 0.56, P = 0.25, P = 0.39 respectively). Patient satisfaction was higher in the early postoperative period in the non-splint group (P = 0.016). The AOFAS score was not significantly different across any time point (P = 0.534). In the splint group, there was a 46% rate of splint-related complaints and complications. Unplanned ER visits occurred in 46% of the splint group and 7.4% of the non-splint group (P < 0.001). There were 2 wound infections, 1 non-union and 1 deep vein thrombosis in the splint group. There was 1 wound infection and 1 deep vein thrombosis in the no-splint group (P = 0.481) CONCLUSION: The routine use of a splint does not add any perceivable benefit to the postoperative course of an ankle fracture fixation, particularly in the reduction of oedema and postoperative pain. Another key finding is that the absence of a splint does not appear to result in higher complication rates, instead leads to higher unplanned ER visits and lower early satisfaction rates.

Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score.

RESULTS

Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) - 6.64 (95% CI - 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD - 6.91 (95% CI - 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD - 2.63 (95% CI - 5.01 to - 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.

Immediate weight bearing without immobilization for operatively treated ankle fractures is safe - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic literature review compared weight bearing (WB) vs. partial- / non-weight bearing (NWB) and mobilization (MB) vs. immobilization (IMB) for surgically treated ankle fractures.

METHODS

Five databases were searched. Eligible were (quasi-)randomized controlled trials comparing at least two different postoperative treatment protocols. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 toolkit. The primary outcome was complication rate, secondary outcome Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), range of motion (ROM), and return to work (RTW).

RESULTS

Out of 10,345 studies, 24 papers were eligible. Thirteen studies (n = 853) compared WB/NWB, 13 studies (n = 706) MB/IMB with a moderate study quality. WB did not increase the risk for complications but resulted in superior short-term outcomes for OMAS, ROM, RTW. 12 studies found no inferior results for MB compared to IMB.

CONCLUSION

Early and immediate WB and MB do not increase the complication rates but result in superior short term outcome scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I Systematic Review.

Effect of Postoperative Immobilization Time on PROMIS Scores and Clinical outcomes in Ankle Fracture Patients

Background

Ankle fractures are among the most common injuries treated by orthopaedic surgeons, yet little guidance exists in postoperative protocols for ankle fractures concerning time of immobilization. Here, we aim to investigate the association between early mobilization and patient-reported outcomes. Our null hypothesis was that no difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores would be identified in patients when comparing the effect of time of immobilization.

Methods

A retrospective review identified ankle fractures that underwent surgical fixation between 2015 and 2020 at a level 1 trauma center and its associated facilities. One hundred nineteen patients from 9 providers met inclusion criteria for our final analysis. Forty-seven patients were immobilized for <6 weeks (early) and 68 patients were immobilized for ≥6 weeks (late). Our primary outcome measures included the PROMIS questionnaire, time of immobilization, and time to full weightbearing. Our secondary outcome measures included time to return to work, wound complications (infection, delayed healing), and complications associated with fracture fixation (loss of reduction, delayed union, reoperation, hardware failure). Repeated measures analysis of variance as well as linear mixed outcome regression were used to predict each of the PROMIS outcomes of anxiety, depression, physical function, and pain interference. Each model included the predictors of age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, smoking status, payor, provider, time to radiographic union, time to return to work, time to full weightbearing, and early vs late immobilized groups.

Results

We found no differences in PROMIS scores between mobilization groups even when controlling for possible confounders such as age, BMI, rheumatoid arthritis, smoking status, and diabetes mellitus (P > .05). Furthermore, we found no differences in complications associated with fracture fixation (P > .05). Across our cohort, lower physical function scores were associated with higher BMI, increasing age, and longer time to return to work/play (P < .05). Our analysis further showed that depression, anxiety, pain interference, and physical function levels improve as a function of time (P < .05). Higher BMI was also noted to have a significant impact on PROMIS depression and anxiety when controlling for other variables. African Americans had greater pain interference scores (P < .05).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that early mobilization in a walker boot after operative treatment of ankle fractures is a safe alternative to casting in non-neuropathic patients. When considering operative treatment of ankle fractures, factors such as increasing age and BMI are likely to negatively affect postoperative anxiety, physical function, and depression PROMIS scores regardless of immobilization time.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Braces versus casts for post-operational immobilization of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis

Background and aims

Both casts and braces can be used for post-operational immobilization of ankle fractures. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the complications and functional effects of the two types of immobilization.

Material and methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI was searched for randomized controlled trials (published between Jan 1, 1950, and March 2022). Relative risk (RR) or standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to present the outcomes. The pooled data were assessed by using the fixed-effects model or random-effects model.

Results

A total of 5 randomized controlled studies involving 930 subjects were included according to our inclusion criteria. On the ankle score at 6w,12w and 52w, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. In terms of 6w, the brace group showed better ankle dorsiflexion (MD = 6.78, 95% CI 0.56-13.00, p = 0.03) and plantar flexion (MD = 6.58, 95% CI 1.60-11.55, p = 0.01) than the cast group. The wound complications (RR = 3.49, 95% CI 1.32 to 9.24, p = 0.01) and total complications (RR = 3.54, 95% CI 1.92 to 6.50, p < 0.0001) in the brace group were three times more than that in the cast group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the non-wound complications. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the time of going back to work, swelling of the ankle, and atrophy of the calf muscle.

Conclusion

The short-term and long-term functional outcomes after postoperative treatment of adult ankle fractures with braces are similar to those with casts. The usage of braces may cause three times more wound complications than that of casts.

Early versus late weight bearing & ankle mobilization in the postoperative management of ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

While open reduction and internal fixation is currently considered the optimum treatment option for displaced ankle fractures, the most optimal post-operative rehabilitation strategy in this setting remains unclear. The objective of this investigation was to compare the effect of early vs. late weight bearing and ankle mobilization in the post-operative management of ankle fractures.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINHAL, and Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors screened articles, abstracted data, and evaluated risk of bias in duplicate. Outcomes of interest included post-operative ankle function and overall time to return to work. Studies on weight bearing and ankle mobilization were analysed separately and all data were pooled using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were included in the review of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis of at least one outcome of interest. Majority of the studies presented a high overall risk of bias. Early weight bearing demonstrated significantly better short-term postoperative functional scores at 6-9 weeks postoperatively (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.58; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). However, the functional effect of early weight bearing compared to late weight bearing gradually became equivalent by the 6 month postoperative time-period. Early weight bearing also demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to return to work/daily activities (MD: -12.29, 95% CI: -17.39, -7.19; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). In comparison, no significant differences were found between early ankle mobilization/exercises and immobilization.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a potential role of EWB in improving post-operative ankle-function in the short-term and reducing the overall time to return to work/daily activities, but no clinical benefit associated with early ankle mobilization post-surgery.

Weight-bearing Allowed Following Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures, a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management regimes vary following open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures. Traditional postoperative nonweightbearing cast immobilization may prevent loss of fixation and protect the soft tissue envelope but may also be associated with poorer functional outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rate and functional outcomes of early weightbearing (EWB) vs late weightbearing (LWB) following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis of controlled trials and comparative cohort studies using 3 databases. We included all studies that investigated the effect of weightbearing following internal fixation of ankle fractures in adult patients by any means. Studies that investigated mobilization but not weightbearing, non-English-language publications, and tibial Plafond fractures were excluded from this systematic review. We assessed the risk of bias using ROB 2 tools for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-1 for cohort studies. Data extraction was performed using Covidence online software and meta-analysis by using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 10 randomized controlled trials and 4 comparative cohort studies. Most of the included studies were rated as having some concern with regard to the risk of bias. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the protected EWB and LWB groups (the risk ratio [RR] for infection was 1.30, 95% CI 0.74, 2.30; I² = 0%; P = .36), but better functional outcome scores were detected in the EWB group only at 6 weeks postoperatively (MD =10.08, 95% CI 5.13, 15.02; I² = 0%; P ≤ .0001), with no significant difference seen at 6 or 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the studies reviewed, it appears that early protected weightbearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures does not affect surgical incision or fracture healing and is associated with better early functional outcomes at 6 weeks, but not 6 or 12 months, postoperatively.

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) in patients with unstable ankle fracture

INTRODUCTION

The Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) is a widely used validated Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM). For clinical research, it is important to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The objective of this study was to determine the MCID of the OMAS at several moments in the follow-up, in a cohort of patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for this descriptive study were extracted from a prospective randomized controlled trial, the RODEO trial. The Dutch version of the OMAS was completed at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up and estimated at baseline. The used anchor-based methods were: mean change and ROC curve. The distribution-based methods were: 0.5SD and minimal detectable change (MDC).

RESULTS

This cohort included 148 patients. The mean OMAS score in the group with minimal improvement between 3 and 6 months was 15.0 (SD 17.5, 95%CI 9.4-20.6) and between 6 and 12 months 9.5 (SD 17.1, 95% CI 3.1-15.9). The ROC curve between 3 and 6 months resulted in a MCID of 12.5 (AUC 0.72) and between 6 and 12 months, the MCID was 7.5 (AUC 0.78). Using 0.5 SD, the MCID was 10.52 (SD 21.04) at 3 months, 11.37 (SD 22.73) at 6 months and 10.47 (SD 20.94) at 12 months. The MDC was 4.72 at 3 months, 5.20 at 6 months and 4.71 at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The calculated MCID in patients following surgery for unstable ankle fractures ranges from 10.5 to 15.0 at 3-6-month follow-up and from 7.5 to 11.4 at 6-12-month follow-up, depending on moment and method.

Post-operative management after total ankle arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus on the most appropriate post-operative management for patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty. The aim of this study is therefore to offer a systematic review of the pertaining literature to identify current post-operative protocols and describe possible differences.

METHODS

A systematic review to identify recent studies concerning the post-operative management after total ankle arthroplasty was conducted. Five topics were analyzed: length of hospital stay, type and duration of immobilization, weight-bearing management, post-operative pharmacological therapies, adopted rehabilitation scheme.

RESULTS

Eighty-four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review process. Most of the papers appear to have conflicting opinions with no consensus and homogeneous protocols.

CONCLUSION

Due to various methodological limitations, it is not possible to provide sufficiently supported evidence-based recommendations, and it is therefore difficult to determine the superiority of one post-operative protocol over the others after total ankle arthroplasty.

Early Return to Daily Life through Immediate Weight-Bearing after Lateral Malleolar Fracture Surgery

Lateral malleolus fracture is one of the most common fractures. However, there is controversy regarding the rehabilitation protocols used after surgery. In particular, the initiation point for weight-bearing has not been standardized. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic difference between immediate and delayed weight-bearing on lateral malleolus fractures. The medical records of matched patients in the immediate and delayed weight-bearing groups (50 and 50, respectively) were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using an anatomical locking compression plate with a lag screw. In the immediate weight-bearing group (IWB), tolerable weight-bearing (i.e., what can be endured immediately after surgery with crutches) was permitted. In the delayed weight-bearing group (DWB), weight-bearing was completely restricted for 4 weeks after surgery. Ankle motion exercise was permitted in both groups, starting from the day after surgery. Radiographic assessment data and clinical outcomes were reviewed between the two groups. No significant differences in radiographic assessments and complications were found between the two groups. Significant differences in terms of a shortened length of hospital stay and time to return to work with the IWB rehabilitation protocol compared with DWB were confirmed (6.0 vs. 9.2 days, p = 0.02 and 6.1 vs. 8.3 weeks, p = 0.02, respectively). A significant difference in sport factor was observed in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score at 3 months postoperatively (72.3 vs. 67.4, p = 0.02). We found no significant differences between the two groups concerning postoperative radiological outcomes and complications. The benefits of shortening the time to return to work and length of hospital stay associated with the IWB rehabilitation protocol were confirmed. In conclusion, immediate weight-bearing is recommended in patients with lateral malleolus fracture after anatomical reduction and firm fixation by surgery.

Early weight bearing and mobilization decrease perioperative complications in patients after ankle fracture; the retrospective multicenter (TRON group) study

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for unstable ankle fractures (AF) are relatively predictable with excellent outcomes. Rehabilitation strategies are still being debated after surgical intervention for AF: non-weight bearing and cast immobilization for six weeks after the surgical repair of unstable AF or early functional treatment with partial weight bearing. This study aimed to compare early weight bearing and functional outcomes and complications.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and March 2019, 1421 patients with AF underwent ORIF at 11 institutions (TRON group). The patients were divided into two groups: Group E started weight bearing within six weeks after surgery, and group L started weightbearing for more than six weeks after. To adjust for baseline difference between groups, a propensity score-matched algorithm was used to match Group E with Group L in a 1:1 ratio of 294 cases each. We compared the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score as the functional outcome, the rate of wound dehiscence, superficial and deep infections, blistering, nonunion, neurapraxia, and reoperation at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean period of non-weight bearing was significantly shorter in group E (3.68 ± 1.02 vs. 6.67 ± 1.43; P < 0.001). The mean period of cast immobilization term were shorter in group E (1.84 ± 1.35 vs. 2.65 ± 1.51; P < 0.001). There were no differences in the AOFAS score at any period. The rates of deep infection and reoperation in Group E were significantly lower than those in Group L (1.7% vs. 6.1%; P = 0.009, 2.0% vs. 7.8%; P = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in superficial infection (9 vs. 15; P = 0.297), nonunion (9 vs. 15 P = 0.30), blistering (4 vs. 3; P = 1.00), neurapraxia (2 vs. 1; P = 1.00), and wound dehiscence (15 vs. 18; P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Although functional outcome was similar depending on whether early weight bearing was allowed, the rates of deep infection and reoperation decreased in patients with early weight bearing. We recommend early postoperative weight bearing in patients with a surgically treated AF.

The Efficacy of Acupuncture on Foot and Ankle for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Quality of Life in Adults: A Systematic Review

Objective: To assess the effect of acupuncture on foot and ankle pain intensity, functional status, quality of life, and incidence of adverse events in adults. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from a systematic search of 6 major English databases, and a manual search of relevant systematic reviews using Google Scholar. RCTs that compared acupuncture with various forms of sham acupuncture, nonactive and waitlist controls for pain intensity, functional status, and general quality of life were included. Study screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and quality assessment were all performed independently. A narrative synthesis was performed when quantitative pooling was inappropriate. Results: Four RCTs were included, encompassing a total of 211 participants. Due to clinical heterogeneity for all outcomes, quantitative analysis was not appropriate. Our Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation rated all outcomes to have either low or very low quality of evidence. With low-quality evidence, acupuncture was shown to be efficacious for participants with plantar fasciitis for pain relief and functional status improvement at short- and intermediate-term follow-ups. Acupuncture was also shown to be efficacious for participants with Achilles tendinopathy for pain relief at short- and intermediate-term follow-ups. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: There is some evidence to suggest acupuncture to be a safe and efficacious treatment for relieving pain and improving functional status for the foot and ankle. The results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to the limited evidence. Future research should take into consideration the findings of this systematic review.

Do Early Weight-Bearing and Range of Motion Affect Outcomes in Operatively Treated Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review was performed to answer the following questions: (1) Does early weight-bearing (WB) after ankle fracture (AF) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) affect outcomes? (2) Does early WB after AF ORIF cause an increase in complications? (3) Does early ankle motion after AF ORIF affect outcomes? and (4) Does early ankle motion after AF ORIF cause an increase in complications?

DATA SOURCES

Articles from 1970 to 2020 were found using the PubMed database.

STUDY SELECTION

Level I studies of adult patients with operatively treated ankle fractures were selected. A total of 1130 cases across 20 studies fit the participant criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were reviewed for data pertaining to the current study questions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The meta-analysis used logistic regression and standardized mean difference.

RESULTS

Based on the current literature, early WB in operative ankle fractures with stable fixation showed no difference in outcomes when compared with delayed WB protocols. Early WB after ORIF did not significantly increase complications. Early ankle motion after AF ORIF did not have significant standardized mean differences between range of motion and immobilization outcomes. Early range of motion before wound healing may lead to an increase in complications [pooled odds ratio: 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-5.90] but did not show an increase in infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend that early WB at 2 weeks postoperatively can be safely considered for ankle fractures when stable fixation has been obtained. Early ankle motion before wound healing is not recommended due to increased wound complications, without improvement in long-term results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early Weightbearing Versus Nonweightbearing After Operative Treatment of an Ankle Fracture: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Acute ankle fractures can occur during sports activities, and unstable ankle fractures are commonly treated operatively. However, controversy exists about the optimal time to allow weightbearing.

HYPOTHESIS

Early weightbearing after the stable fixation of an ankle fracture is not inferior to nonweightbearing in terms of ankle function assessed at 12 months after injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 258 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these patients, 194 were randomly allocated to either the early weightbearing group (95 patients who were allowed weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperatively) or the nonweightbearing group (99 patients who were not allowed weightbearing until 6 weeks postoperatively). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference in the Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS) between the groups, assessed at the 12-month follow-up examination. The secondary outcome measures were the time to return to preinjury activities and patients' subjective satisfaction. Complications such as hardware loosening or failure, fracture displacement, and nonunion were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean difference in the OMAS for the early weightbearing group compared with the nonweightbearing group was 1.6 (95% CI, -1.9 to 5.0) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The lower limit of the 95% CI (-1.9) exceeded the noninferiority margin of -8, indicating that early weightbearing was not inferior to nonweightbearing. The difference in the proportion of patients who were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment was not statistically significant (84.3% vs 76.2%; P = .19); however, the time taken to return to preinjury activities was shorter with early weightbearing than with nonweightbearing (9.1 ± 3.0 vs 11.0 ± 3.0 weeks; P < .001). No cases of nonunion were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Early weightbearing after the operative treatment of an unstable ankle fracture was not inferior to nonweightbearing in terms of OMAS assessed at 12 months after injury. The patients' subjective satisfaction was similar between the groups, although the time taken to return to preinjury activities was shorter in the early weightbearing group.

REGISTRATION

NCT02029170 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Effect of Early Weight Bearing on Outcomes After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures

Current practice allows early weight bearing of unstable ankle fractures after fixation. This study offers a unique comparison of early weight bearing (EWB) vs late weight bearing (LWB) in operatively stabilized trimalleolar ankle fractures. The goal of this study was to evaluate union rates, clinical outcomes, and complications for patients who were managed with EWB vs LWB. The authors performed a retrospective review of 185 patients who underwent surgical stabilization for trimalleolar ankle fracture. Fixation of the posterior malleolus and weight bearing status were determined by surgeon preference. For this study, EWB was defined as 3 weeks or less and LWB was defined as greater than 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for fracture union and implant failure. Complications and clinical outcomes included ambulatory status, infection rate, and return to surgery. The EWB group included 47 (25.4%) patients, and the LWB group included 138 (74.6%) patients. Of the 7 nonunions, 1 (14.3%) occurred in the EWB group and 6 (85.7%) in the LWB group. A total of 72 (38.9%) posterior malleolar fractures were operatively stabilized, and stabilization did not affect union rates. Syndesmotic fixation was required for 12.5% of patients, despite posterior malleolar stabilization. Syndesmotic fixation increased the union rate 2.5 times. Deep infection and open fracture decreased union. No difference was seen between groups in implant failure, union rate, infection, or return to the operating room. No deleterious effect of EWB in operatively treated trimalleolar ankle fractures was found for union, implant failure, infection, or reoperation. Syndesmotic fixation may offer an advantage over posterior malleolar fixation, with improved union rates. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):160-165.].

Early Protected Weightbearing After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures With Trans-syndesmotic Screws

Traditional postoperative care after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability includes non-weightbearing for 6 to 8 weeks. However, prolonged non-weightbearing may be detrimental. The goal of this case series was to assess the outcomes of early protected weightbearing after operative treatment of acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability requiring screw stabilization. Fifty-eight consecutive patients, treated from January 2006 to January 2013, met the inclusion criteria with a minimum follow up of 1 year. Electronic medical records and radiographs were reviewed for patient and surgical characteristics, postoperative complications, and maintenance of reduction. Patients initiated walking at an average of 10 days (range 1 to 15) postoperatively. Surgical treatment consisted of operative reduction with standard fixation devices and 1 or 2 trans-syndesmotic screws that purchased 4 cortices. All 58 patients maintained correction after surgery when allowed to weightbear early in the postoperative recovery. Five complications (8.6%) occurred in the 58 patients, which included 3 superficial infections (5.2%) and 2 cases (3.4%) of neuritis. The maintenance of reduction and low complication rate in this study support the option of early protected weightbearing after ankle fracture ORIF with trans-syndesmotic fixation.

Immediate Weightbearing After Operative Treatment of Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures: Faster Return to Work for Patients with Nonsedentary Occupations

The goal of this study was to compare immediate weightbearing (IWB) and traditional weightbearing (TWB) postoperative protocols in unstable ankle fractures, as this has not been compared in prior works. We hypothesize that an immediate weightbearing protocol after ankle fracture fixation will lead to an earlier return to work. An ankle fracture registry was reviewed for operatively treated unstable bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures at an ambulatory surgery center and followed up at associated outpatient clinics. All fracture cases reviewed occurred from 2009 to 2015. Immediate weightbearing patients were placed into a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot and allowed to fully bear weight the day of surgery. Traditional weightbearing patients were placed into a CAM boot with 6 weeks of non-weightbearing. Demographics, fixation technique, and injury characteristics were surveyed. Physical job demand was stratified for 69 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (34 IWB and 35 TWB). The main outcome of this study was measured as the time to return to work. Subgroup analysis of patients with nonsedentary jobs demonstrated a significantly earlier return to work for the IWB group (5.7 versus 10.0 weeks, p = .04). Multivariate regression analysis identified a statistically significant 2.25-week (p = .05) earlier return to work for the IWB group after adjustment for occupational physical demand, demographics, fracture characteristics, and participation in a light work period before full work return. In patients with nonsedentary jobs, an IWB protocol after operative management of bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures resulted in an earlier return to work compared with traditional protocols.

Immediate Weight-Bearing and Range of Motion After Internal Fixation of Selected Malleolar Fractures: A Retrospective Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

We studied the safety of immediate weight-bearing as tolerated (IWBAT) and immediate range of motion (IROM) after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of selected malleolar ankle fractures (defined as involving bony or ligamentous disruption of 2 or more of the malleoli or syndesmosis without articular comminution) and attempted to identify risk factors for complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Level 1 Urban Trauma Center and multiple community hospitals, orthopedic specialty hospitals, and outpatient surgicenters within one metropolitan area.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Of 268 patients at our level 1 trauma center who underwent primary ORIF of a selected malleolar fracture from 2013 to 2018, we identified 133 (49.6%) who were selected for IWBAT and IROM. We used propensity score matching to identify 172 controls who were non-weight-bearing (NWB) and no range of motion for 6 weeks postoperatively. The groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, Charleston Comorbidity Index, smoking status, diabetes status, malleoli involved, percentages undergoing medial malleolus (60.9% IWBAT vs. 51.7% NWB), posterior malleolus (24.1% IWBAT, 26.7% NWB), or syndesmosis fixation (41.4% IWBAT, 42.4% NWB, P = 0.85).

INTERVENTION

IWBAT and IROM after ankle ORIF versus NWB for 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative complications, including delayed wound healing, superficial or deep infection, and loss of reduction.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in total complications (P = 0.41), nonoperative complications (P = 0.53), or operative complications, including a loss of reduction (P = 0.89). We did not identify any factors associated with an increased complication risk, including posterior malleolus or syndesmosis fixation, diabetes, age, or preinjury-assisted ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We failed to demonstrate a difference in complications in general and loss of reduction in particular when allowing immediate weight-bearing/ROM in selected cases of operatively treated malleolar fractures, suggesting this may be safe. Future prospective randomized studies are necessary to determine if immediate weight-bearing/ROM is safe and whether it offers any benefits to patients with operatively treated malleolar fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is postoperative non-weight-bearing necessary? INWN Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised multicentre trial of operatively treated ankle fracture

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management regimes vary following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures. There is an evolving understanding that extended periods of immobilisation and weight-bearing limitation may lead to poorer clinical outcomes. Traditional non-weight-bearing cast immobilisation may prevent loss of fixation, and this practice continues in many centres. The purpose of this trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of immediate weight-bearing (IWB) and range of motion (ROM) exercise regimes following ORIF of unstable ankle fractures with a particular focus on functional outcomes and complication rates.

METHODS

A pragmatic randomised controlled multicentre trial, comparing IWB in a walking boot and ROM within 24 h versus non-weight-bearing (NWB) and immobilisation in a cast for 6 weeks, following ORIF of all types of unstable adult ankle fractures (lateral malleolar, bimalleolar, trimalleolar with or without syndesmotic injury) is proposed. All patients presenting to three trauma units will be included. The exclusion criteria will be skeletal immaturity and tibial plafond fractures. The three institutional review boards have granted ethical approval. The primary outcome measure will be the functional Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes include wound infection (deep and superficial), displacement of osteosynthesis, the full arc of ankle motion (plantar flexion and dorsal flection), RAND-36 Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scoring, time to return to work and postoperative hospital length of stay. The trial will be reported in accordance with the CONSORT statement for reporting a pragmatic trial, and this protocol will follow the SPIRIT guidance.

DISCUSSION

Traditional management of operatively treated ankle fractures includes an extended period of non-weight-bearing. There is emerging evidence that earlier weight-bearing may have equivocal outcomes and favourable patient satisfaction but higher wound-related complications. These studies often preclude more complicated fracture patterns or patient-related factors. To our knowledge, immediate weight-bearing (IWB) following ORIF of all types of unstable ankle fractures has not been investigated in a controlled prospective manner in recent decades. This pragmatic randomised-controlled multicentre trial will investigate immediate weight-bearing following ORIF of all ankle fracture patterns in the usual care condition. It is hoped that these results will contribute to the modern management of ankle fractures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN76410775 . Retrospectively registered on 30 June 2019.

[Aftercare following surgical treatment of ankle fractures : What is the current state of knowledge?]

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are among the most common fractures in adults but often with unsatisfactory long-term results. In recent years several new surgical treatment approaches have been developed but little has changed regarding the aftercare. The postoperative treatment can be divided into two main components, weight bearing and mobilization. In Germany most patients are still recommended to be immobilized with partial weight bearing for 6 weeks after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to present the current evidence on postoperative treatment based on an extensive literature search.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of seven prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) compared early and delayed full weight bearing and six RCTs compared ankle mobilization with a form of immobilization.

RESULTS

In none of these studies did early full weight bearing lead to an increased complication rate but some studies found a shortened time before return to work and, at least in the short term, better clinical results. Immediate mobilization led to an increased complication rate in only one out of six studies. It also appeared that mobilization led to a reduced time before return to work and, in the short term, to better clinical outcomes. The comparability of the studies was limited as in most cases different clinical scores and parameters were collated. In addition, information on patient age, fracture type, bone quality, comorbidities, and the implants used was often inadequate and post-treatment regimens sometimes differed significantly.

CONCLUSION

The early functional therapy following surgically treated ankle fractures increased the rate of wound healing complications in only one of 13 studies, otherwise there were no significant differences in complication rates; however, early functional therapy partly shortened the time to return to work and led to better clinical results in the short term. For future studies, standardization of the parameters assessed would be important to provide clear evidence-based guidelines on follow-up treatment for specific fractures and patient populations.

An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: Update from 2001 to 2013

BACKGROUND

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) from 1988 to 2000 was previously analyzed. The purpose of this current study was to analyze the quality of reporting of RCTs published in JBJS from 2001 to 2013 to identify trends over time and potential areas of improvement for future clinical trials.

METHODS

A manual search of the JBJS database identified RCTs published between January 2001 and December 2013. Quality assessments, using the Detsky quality-of-reporting index (Detsky score), a modified Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and abstraction of relevant data identifying predictors of quality, were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 5,780 publications were identified in JBJS from 2001 to 2013, with 285 RCTs (4.9%), representing an increase from the prior 13-year period. The overall mean transformed Detsky score (and standard error) increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 68.1% ± 1.67% to 76.24% ± 0.72%. The percentage of multicenter RCTs decreased from 67% to 31%. The percentage of positive trials also decreased from 80% to 50.5%, as did the mean sample size (212 to 166). Regression analysis indicated that trials with an epidemiologist as the first author and nonsurgical trials were significantly associated (p = 0.001) with a higher overall trial quality score. The categories of the lowest mean methodology scores were randomization and concealment, eligibility criteria, and reasons for patient exclusion, as identified with the Detsky score, and patient and assessor blinding, as identified with the risk-of-bias assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity and quality of published RCTs in JBJS have increased in the 2001 to 2013 time period compared with the previous time period. Although these improvements are encouraging, trends to smaller, single-center trials were also observed. To efficiently determine the efficacy of orthopaedic treatments and limit bias, high-quality randomized trials of appropriate sample size and rigorous design are needed.

Compared to conventional physiotherapy, does the use of an ankle trainer device after Weber B ankle fracture operation improve outcome and shorten hospital stay? A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the functional outcomes and length of hospital stay for patients treated with conventional physiotherapy compared to a new ankle trainer device after Weber B ankle fractures.

DESIGN

The patients were randomized, and then followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 52 weeks by a blinded physiotherapist.

SETTING

This study was done at a level 1 trauma centre.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and forty consecutive patients with Weber B ankle fractures that were operated on were screened for eligibility, of whom 113 were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Conventional physiotherapy with stretching exercises, using a non-elastic band or using new ankle trainer.

MAIN MEASURES

Outcomes were evaluated with Olerud-Molander ankle score, Visual analogue scale for pain and ankle dorsiflexion at 3, 6, 12 and 52 weeks follow-up. Time of hospitalization and complications were registered.

RESULTS

Superior Olerud-Molander ankle scores were observed at three weeks follow-up in the ankle trainer group 40.9 (10.8), compared to the conventional group 35.3 (14.2) (P = 0.021). At one-year follow-up, there was no difference between the groups (P = 0.386). The ankle trainer group had a shorter hospital stay with a mean 2.6 days (0.98) compared to 3.2 days (1.47) in the conventional group (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The patients who were treated with the new ankle trainer device recovered more rapidly, evaluated by the Olerud-Molander ankle score and had a shorter stay in hospital compared to the conventional physiotherapy group. No between group differences could be observed at long-term follow-up.

Effect on Overall Health Status With Weightbearing at 2 Weeks vs 6 Weeks After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Ongoing controversy exists on postoperative weightbearing status after open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare patient-based and physician-based outcomes after early weightbearing at 2 vs 6 weeks postoperatively.

METHODS

Fifty patients with unstable rotational-type ankle fractures were treated operatively with subsequent immobilization in a below-the-knee cast for 2 weeks and were then randomly allocated to 2 groups. The first group had early weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperation and the second group at 6 weeks postoperation. Follow-up included subjective and objective evaluations performed at 2, 6, 12, and 26 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was the patient-based general health status as measured with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scoring system. Secondary outcome was the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Power analysis revealed a study group of 50 patients was needed to show a clinically relevant effect size of 10 points in both EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) score and Olerud and Molander score.

RESULTS

Patients in the early weightbearing group had higher mean EQ-5D VAS scores at a 6-week follow-up (P = .014) of 77 ± 14 compared to 66 ± 15 for late mobilization. No difference was found at other follow-up points or between groups for physician-based outcome measures. At 26 weeks postoperatively, mean Olerud and Molander ankle scores were similar at 84 ± 16 and 81 ± 17 for mobilization at 2 and 6 weeks postoperation, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early weightbearing after operative fixation of rotational-type ankle fractures had a clinically relevant and statistically significant benefit in patient-based general health status, as quantified with EQ-5D VAS scores, at 6 weeks postoperation. These results contribute to our understanding of early weightbearing and may encourage consideration of weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperatively in standard protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Safety of Early Weight Bearing Following Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures

Ankle fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Although operative indications and subsequent stabilization of these fractures have not significantly changed, postoperative protocols remain highly variable. Effects of early weight bearing (EWB) on fracture characteristics in operatively stabilized bimalleolar and bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures remain poorly publicized. This study seeks to clarify postoperative fracture union rates, rates of hardware loosening or failure, and radiographic medial clear space changes when comparing EWB to late weight bearing (LWB) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

A total of 95 patients with either bimalleolar (66%) or bimalleolar equivalent (34%) fractures who underwent ORIF were retrospectively reviewed. Weight bearing was allowed at three weeks in the EWB group and when signs of radiographic union were noted in the LWB group. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated at regular intervals for fracture union, signs of implant failure, and evidence of medial clear space widening radiographically.

There were 38 patients (40%) in the EWB group and 57 patients (60%) comprising the LWB cohort. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. The EWB group on average began to weight bear at 3.1 + 1.4 weeks postoperatively, whereas the LWB group began at 7.2 + 2.1 weeks postoperatively (p<0.01). Union rate (p=0.51), time to union (p=0.23), and implant failure (p>0.1 at all time intervals) were not notably different between groups. No differences in medial clear space were detected at any postoperative interval between groups (p>0.1 at all time intervals). This study suggests that EWB at three weeks postoperatively does not increase markers of radiographic failure compared to six weeks of non-weight bearing (NWB), which has been regarded as the gold standard of treatment to allow for healing; this may represent an improvement to rehabilitation protocols after bimalleolar ankle ORIF of unstable ankle fractures.

The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The overall objective of this study was to determine the patient-level socioeconomic impact resulting from orthopaedic trauma in the available literature. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in December 2019. Studies were eligible for inclusion if more than 75% of the study population sustained an appendicular fracture due to an acute trauma, the mean age was 18 through 65 years, and the study included a socioeconomic outcome, defined as a measure of income, employment status, or educational status. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Pooled estimates of the socioeconomic outcome measures were calculated using random-effects models with inverse variance weighting. Two-hundred-five studies met the eligibility criteria. These studies utilized five different socioeconomic outcomes, including return to work (n = 119), absenteeism days from work (n = 104), productivity loss (n = 11), income loss (n = 11), and new unemployment (n = 10). Pooled estimates for return to work remained relatively consistent across the 6-, 12-, and 24-month timepoint estimates of 58.7%, 67.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The pooled estimate for mean days absent from work was 102.3 days (95% CI: 94.8-109.8). Thirteen-percent had lost employment at one-year post-injury (95% CI: 4.8-30.7). Tremendous heterogeneity (I2>89%) was observed for all pooled socioeconomic outcomes. These results suggest that orthopaedic injury can have a substantial impact on the patient's socioeconomic well-being, which may negatively affect a person's psychological wellbeing and happiness. However, socioeconomic recovery following injury can be very nuanced, and using only a single socioeconomic outcome yields inherent bias. Informative and accurate socioeconomic outcome assessment requires a multifaceted approach and further standardization.

Ankle Motion and Offloading in Short Leg Cast and Low and High Fracture Boots

BACKGROUND

Short leg casts (SLCs) and fracture boots are used to treat foot and ankle injuries, but the decision to use one device over the other is often subjective. This study compared the impact of SLCs and low and high fracture boots on ankle motion and offloading.

METHODS

Twenty healthy adults were prospectively studied. High-speed dynamic radiography was utilized to determine tibiotalar range of motion in the sagittal plane during nonweightbearing (NWB) and weightbearing (WB) gait in a shoe (control), SLC, and low and high fracture boots. Sensors captured peak plantar surface forces to determine ankle offloading.

RESULTS

In NWB, the low fracture boot (2.2 ± 2.0 degrees), high fracture boot (2.3 ± 1.6 degrees), and SLC (2.3 ± 1.5 degrees) had significantly less motion compared with the control (3.6 ± 2.1 degrees; P ≤ .026). During WB, the SLC (3.4 ± 1.4 degrees) and high fracture boot (4.8 ± 2.0 degrees) had less motion compared with the low fracture boot (7.8 ± 3.4 degrees; P < .001). Finally, the SLC (172.6% ± 48.3% body weight [BW]) and low fracture (165.1% ± 36.2% BW) and high fracture (154.5% ± 32.9% BW) boots were associated with less peak plantar surface force compared with the control (195.0% ± 43.8% BW; P ≤ .087).

CONCLUSION

The SLC and high fracture boot immobilized the ankle in NWB and offloaded and immobilized the ankle in WB. The low fracture boot also immobilized the ankle in NWB, but in WB, the low fracture boot only offloaded the ankle and did not immobilize it.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The low fracture boot may be more suited for NWB or possibly immobilizing the foot in WB.

Ankle Fractures: An Expert Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members and Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To describe current practice patterns of orthopaedic trauma experts regarding the management of ankle fractures, to review the current literature, and to provide recommendations for care based on a standardized grading system.

DESIGN

Web-based survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) members.

METHODS

A 27-item web-based questionnaire was advertised to members of the OTA. Using a cross-sectional survey study design, we evaluated the preferences in diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-six of 1967 OTA members (8.4%) completed the survey (16% of active members). There is considerable variability in the preferred method of diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures among the members surveyed. Most responses are in keeping with best evidence available.

CONCLUSIONS

Current controversy remains in the management of ankle fractures. This is reflected in the treatment preferences of the OTA members who responded to this survey.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures: randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether treatment of isolated stable Weber B type ankle fractures with a cast or a simple orthotic device for three weeks produces non-inferior outcomes compared with conventional immobilisation in a cast for six weeks.

DESIGN

Randomised, pragmatic, non-inferiority, clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment.

SETTING

Two major trauma centres in Finland, 22 December 2012 to 6 June 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

247 skeletally mature patients aged 16 years or older with an isolated Weber B type fibula fracture and congruent ankle mortise in static ankle radiographs.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly allocated to conventional six week cast immobilisation (n=84) or three week treatment either in a cast (n=83) or in a simple orthosis (n=80).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary, non-inferiority, intention-to-treat outcome was the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 12 months (OMAS; range 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes and fewer symptoms). The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome was -8.8 points. Secondary outcomes were ankle function, pain, quality of life, ankle motion, and radiographic outcome. Follow-up assessments were performed at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.

RESULTS

212 of 247 randomised participants (86%) completed the study. At 52 weeks, the mean OMAS was 87.6 (SD 18.3) in the six week cast group, 91.7 (SD 12.9) in the three week cast group, and 89.8 (SD 18.4) in the three week orthosis group. The between group difference at 52 weeks for the three week cast versus six week cast was 3.6 points (95% confidence interval -1.9 to 9.1, P=0.20), and for the three week orthosis versus six week cast was 1.7 points (-4.0 to 7.3, P=0.56). In both comparisons, the confidence intervals did not include the predefined inferiority margin of -8.8 points. The only statistically significant between group differences observed in the secondary outcomes and harms in the two primary comparisons were slight improvement in ankle plantar flexion and incidence of deep vein thrombosis, both in the three week orthosis group versus six week cast group.

CONCLUSION

Immobilisation for three weeks with a cast or orthosis was non-inferior to conventional cast immobilisation for six weeks in the treatment of an isolated stable Weber B type fracture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01758835.

Weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing after surgical treatment of ankle fractures: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Purpose

The goal of this study was to assess if unprotected weight-bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight-bearing and unprotected non-weight-bearing in terms of functional outcome and complications after surgical fixation of Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation stage 2–4 ankle fractures.

Methods

A multicentered randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients ranging from 18 to 65 years of age without severe comorbidities. Patients were randomized to unprotected non-weight-bearing, protected weight-bearing, and unprotected weight-bearing as tolerated. The primary endpoint of the study was the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) 12 weeks after randomization. The secondary endpoints were health-related quality of life using the SF-36v2, time to return to work, time to return to sports, and the number of complications.

Results

The trial was terminated early as advised by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board after interim analysis. A total of 115 patients were randomized. The O’Brien–Fleming threshold for statistical significance for this interim analysis was 0.008 at 12 weeks. The OMAS was higher in the unprotected weight-bearing group after 6 weeks c(61.2 ± 19.0) compared to the protected weight-bearing (51.8 ± 20.4) and unprotected non-weight-bearing groups (45.8 ± 22.4) (p = 0.011). All other follow-up time points did not show significant differences between the groups. Unprotected weight-bearing showed a significant earlier return to work (p = 0.028) and earlier return to sports (p = 0.005). There were no differences in the quality of life scores or number of complications.

Conclusions

Unprotected weight-bearing and mobilization as tolerated as postoperative care regimen improved short-term functional outcomes and led to earlier return to work and sports, yet did not result in an increase of complications.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00068-018-1016-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Rehabilitation after plate fixation of upper and lower extremity fractures

Post-operative rehabilitation and weight-bearing protocols are important to fracture fixation outcomes, yet there is a dearth in the literature concerning universal treatment guidelines following plate fixation of extremity fractures. There are controversies regarding time to allow weight-bearing and range of motion for most fractures of the upper and lower extremity. This lack of a consensus has led to varying practice guidelines and differing anecdotal protocols between treating surgeons. This review attempts to establish consensus guidelines for the post-operative rehabilitation required for patients following plate fixation of common upper and lower extremity fractures.

Early motion and directed exercise (EMADE) versus usual care post ankle fracture fixation: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Background

Following surgical fixation of ankle fractures, the traditional management has included immobilisation for 6 weeks in a below-knee cast. However, this can lead to disuse atrophy of the affected leg and joint stiffness. While early rehabilitation from 2 weeks post surgery is viewed as safe, controversy remains regarding its benefits. We will compare the effectiveness of early motion and directed exercise (EMADE) ankle rehabilitation, against usual care, i.e. 6 weeks’ immobilisation in a below-knee cast.

Method/design

We have designed a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (p-RCT) to compare the EMADE intervention against usual care. We will recruit 144 independently living adult participants, absent of tissue-healing comorbidities, who have undergone surgical stabilisation of isolated Weber B ankle fractures. The EMADE intervention consists of a non-weight-bearing progressive home exercise programme, complemented with manual therapy and education. Usual care consists of immobilisation in a non-weight-bearing below-knee cast. The intervention period is between week 2 and week 6 post surgery. The primary outcome is the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) at 12 weeks post surgery. Secondary PROMs include the EQ-5D-5 L questionnaire, return to work and return to driving, with objective outcomes including ankle range of motion. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. An economic evaluation will be included.

Discussion

The EMADE intervention is a package of care designed to address the detrimental effects of disuse atrophy and joint stiffness. An advantage of the OMAS is the potential of meta-analysis with other designs. Within the economic evaluation, the cost-utility analysis, may be used by commissioners, while the use of patient-relevant outcomes, such as return to work and driving, will ensure that the study remains pertinent to patients and their families. As it is being conducted in the clinical environment, this p-RCT has high external validity. Accordingly, if significant clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness are demonstrated, EMADE should become a worthwhile treatment option. A larger-scale, multicentre trial may be required to influence national guidelines.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN11212729. Registered retrospectively on 20 March 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2691-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions

BACKGROUND

Assistive products are items which allow older people and people with disabilities to be able to live a healthy, productive and dignified life. It has been estimated that approximately 1.5% of the world's population need a prosthesis or orthosis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to systematically identify and review the evidence from randomized controlled trials assessing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

METHODS

Literature searches, completed in September 2015, were carried out in fourteen databases between years 1995 and 2015. The search results were independently screened by two reviewers. For the purpose of this manuscript, only randomized controlled trials which examined interventions using orthotic or prosthetic devices were selected for data extraction and synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 342 randomised controlled trials were identified (319 English language and 23 non-English language). Only 4 of these randomised controlled trials examined prosthetic interventions and the rest examined orthotic interventions. These orthotic interventions were categorised based on the medical conditions/injuries of the participants. From these studies, this review focused on the medical condition/injuries with the highest number of randomised controlled trials (osteoarthritis, fracture, stroke, carpal tunnel syndrome, plantar fasciitis, anterior cruciate ligament, diabetic foot, rheumatoid and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankle sprain, cerebral palsy, lateral epicondylitis and low back pain). The included articles were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Details of the clinical population examined, the type of orthotic/prosthetic intervention, the comparator/s and the outcome measures were extracted. Effect sizes and odds ratios were calculated for all outcome measures, where possible.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, for prosthetic and orthotic interventions, the scientific literature does not provide sufficient high quality research to allow strong conclusions on their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Definition of infection after fracture fixation: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to evaluate current practice

INTRODUCTION

One of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in modern trauma surgery is infection after fracture fixation (IAFF). Although infections are clinically obvious in many cases, a clear definition of the term IAFF is crucial, not only for the evaluation of published research data but also for the establishment of uniform treatment concepts. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the definitions used in the scientific literature to describe infectious complications after internal fixation of fractures. The hypothesis of this study was that the majority of fracture-related literature do not define IAFF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Medline (OvidSP), PubMed publisher and Web-of-Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fracture fixation. Data were collected on the definition of infectious complications after fracture fixation used in each study. Study selection was accomplished through two phases. During the first phase, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and the full texts of relevant articles were obtained. During the second phase, full-text articles were reviewed. All definitions were literally extracted and collected in a database. Then, a classification was designed to rate the quality of the description of IAFF.

RESULTS

A total of 100 RCT's were identified in the search. Of 100 studies, only two (2%) cited a validated definition to describe IAFF. In 28 (28%) RCTs, the authors used a self-designed definition. In the other 70 RCTs, (70%) there was no description of a definition in the Methods section, although all of the articles described infections as an outcome parameter in the Results section.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows that IAFF is not defined in a large majority of the fracture-related literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted with the objective to explore this important issue. The lack of a consensus definition remains a problem in current orthopedic trauma research and treatment and this void should be addressed in the near future.

Shorter recovery can be achieved from using walking boot after operative treatment of an ankle fracture

Background/Objective

Ankle fractures, even if treated surgically, usually take a long time to heal. For all patients with ankle fracture, immobilisation is a critical part of treatment. Short-leg walking boots (WBs) have been reported to be an effective alternative to plaster casts (PCs) that could shorten this postoperative recuperative period. The aim of this study was to compare the functional recovery of a conventional PC with that of a WB after surgery for ankle fractures.

Methods

Forty-seven patients (mean age, 53.9 ± 12 years) who had undergone surgical operation for an unstable ankle fracture from January 2008 to October 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Either a PC or a WB was prescribed postoperatively, with 25 patients and 22 patients, respectively. The time that it took the patient to stand unipedal on the affected side after allowing full-weight bear and to walk without crutches were used for assessment of functional recovery. The prevalence of postoperative loss of reduction and nonunion was also reviewed.

Results

Both the time of being able to stand unipedal on the injured side and to walk without crutches were significantly shorter in patients using WBs (WB, 2.6 weeks; PC, 4.5 weeks, p = 0.01; WB, 1.4 weeks; PC, 3.1 weeks, p = 0.03). There were no patients with loss of reduction or nonunion.

Conclusion

Patients who used WBs showed a significantly faster recovery. WBs have an adjustable heel lift that allows users to change the ankle position slightly plantarflexed that helps walking in a postoperative swollen ankle. WBs are easy to slip on, and it is easy to adjust the ankle position in conformity with swelling so that the least painful position could be maintained during walking. WBs have good fixity to allow immediate weight-bearing postoperatively, and there were no cases with loss of reduction postoperatively. The Rocker bottom design minimises the sagittal plane motion in the specific joint of the foot, which also facilitates the course of recuperation. An ankle fracture fixed appropriately endures loading when a WB is used. The WB treatment results in faster functional recovery, allowing the patients to return to normal activity at a faster rate.

Gait analysis and functional outcomes after twelve-week rehabilitation in patients with surgically treated ankle fractures

Ankle fractures are the most common type of lower extremity fractures. The objective of our study was to analyse the changes of temporal and spatial gait parameters and functional outcomes in patients with bimalleolar fractures who followed surgery and rehabilitation compared to healthy controls. 49 patients with ankle fractures and 21 age-matched healthy volunteers were recruited. There were two assessments for the study group: T1 - once weight-bearing was allowed and T2 - twelve weeks after exercise-based rehabilitation programme. Each evaluation consisted in a functional questionnaire (Olerud-Molander Ankle Score-OMAS) and temporal and spatial gait parameters analysis. The gait parameters were analysed using a Zebris FDM platform. 30 patients completed the final assessment and their data were analysed. In T1 assessment there were significant differences in all temporal and spatial gait parameters between the patients group and controls. In T2 evaluation step time in affected ankle and non-affected ankle, swing time and stance time on affected ankle, stride time and cadence showed no significant differences in patients compared with controls. The within-group analysis showed significant differences in all temporal and spatial gait parameters except for single support time on non-affected ankle after rehabilitation. The OMAS improved significantly from T1 to T2 in all subscales except for squatting. Median value of OMAS improved from 60 (35-90) to 95 (55-100). Our study revealed significant improvements of all temporal and spatial gait parameters, as well as of the functional outcome in patients with surgically treated ankle fractures after twelve-week rehabilitation.

Clinical research on postoperative trauma care: has the position of observational studies changed?

OBJECTIVE

The postoperative care regimes of ankle fractures are studied for over 30 years and recommendations have shifted only slightly in the last decades. However, study methodology might have evolved. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in time in the design, quality and outcome measures of studies investigating the postoperative care of ankle fractures.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE database were searched for both RCTs and cohort studies. The original studies were divided into decades of publication over the last 30 years. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the 'traditional' risk of bias assessment tool provided by The Cochrane Collaboration and the 'newer' MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

The percentage of RCTs on this subject declined from 67 to 38 % in the last decades. According to the Cochrane tool, the reported quality of RCTs has improved in the last three decades whereas the reported quality of observational studies has remained unchanged. However, when quality was evaluated with the MINORS criteria, equal improvement was observed for both RCTs and observational studies. In the 80s, 67 % of all studies used the range of motion as the primary outcome measure, which decreased to 45 % in the 90s. In the 00s, none of the studies used the range of motion as the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

For postoperative care of ankle fractures, results of this study showed a relative decrease in the published number of RCTs. The overall quality of the published articles did not decline. In addition, a gradual shift from physician measured to patient-reported outcome variables was observed. However, it should be borne in mind that the findings are based on a small sample (n = 25).