Transfer of fascicles from the ulnar nerve to the nerve to the biceps in the treatment of upper brachial plexus palsy

Modified double fascicular nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries - A series of 32 cases

Background

Elbow flexion restoration is one of the most important objectives of brachial plexus surgery in upper root injuries. Many authors have shown very good results with double fascicular nerve transfers and it has become the mainstay of nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration. We present the results of a modified version of this double fascicular transfer.

Methods

A retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent the modified double fascicular nerve transfer(i.e median n to n to biceps and ulnar n to n to brachialis) was done. The average duration for delay in surgery from the time of injury was 5.6 months. The average age of the patients was 35.84. The average follow up of the patients was 39.3months.

Results

All patients had M0 or M1 power preoperatively. Eight patients had M3 power and 22 patients had M4 or M4+ power post operatively. Two patients did not recover meaningful elbow flexion. The results were similar to the original double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

Conclusion

The modified version of the double fascicular nerve transfer is as reliable and produces similar results to the original double fascicular transfer. The theoretical advantages include the ease of doing the operation - (i) The n to biceps and median n are closer. (ii) The length of the n to brachialis allows it to be swung across the arm to reach the more posterior and medial ulnar nerve.

Functional outcomes following nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow reanimation in brachial plexus injuries: a 10-year retrospective study

Brachial plexus injuries are rare but highly disabling, with major implications for upper limb function and quality of life. Nerve transfers have emerged as a key reconstructive technique, particularly valuable in cases where primary repair or grafting is unfeasible or delayed. This retrospective study analysed functional outcomes following nerve transfers in 37 patients with brachial plexus injury. Motor recovery was assessed using the Medical Research Council scale. Patients were stratified by age, timing of surgery, injury severity, and type of nerve transfer performed. The majority of our cohort consisted of male adults, predominantly injured in motorcycle accidents, while pediatric cases were mostly due to obstetrical trauma. For shoulder reanimation, all patients received spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer, with a subset also undergoing medial triceps branch of the radial nerve to axillary nerve transfer. These techniques resulted in 85.3% of patients achieving shoulder function recovery with M3 or M4 muscle strength, with combined procedures leading exclusively to M3 or M4 muscle strength. For elbow flexion restoration, surgical approaches included intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer, ulnar and median fascicles to musculocutaneous nerve transfer, contralateral C7 to musculocutaneous nerve transfer with ulnar graft, and spinal accessory to musculocutaneous nerve transfer with sural nerve graft. Root grafting procedures using sural nerve grafts or nerve conduits were employed in three pediatric patients. Overall, 84.38% of patients achieved elbow flexion recovery with M3 or M4 muscle strength. These findings reinforce the utility of nerve transfers as a cornerstone in the surgical management of brachial plexus injury.

Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion

Background

Nerve reconstruction following brachial plexus injury (BPI) is a time-sensitive procedure, and surgical delay may negatively impact muscle reinnervation and outcomes. This study investigated the impact of surgical timing on elbow flexion strength in patients with BPI undergoing nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. English-language studies investigating the single fascicular transfer (SFT) or double fascicular transfer (DFT) to restore elbow flexion in BPI were included. Data were analyzed to identify the predictors of elbow flexion strength: surgery timing, age, injury level, and SFT versus DFT.

Results

The literature search identified 1051 articles. Studies (n = 31) reporting data of individual patients who underwent SFT (n = 341) or DFT (n = 67) were included; the mean age was 29.6 ± 11.2 years, time from injury to surgery was 6.5 ± 5.0 months, and follow-up was 27.1 ± 24.3 months. Good elbow flexion strength was found: Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 3 in 352 (86.3%) and Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 4 in 288 (70.6%). In the adjusted analysis, poorer motor recovery was associated with increased age (P = 0.02), surgical delay (P < 0.0001), C5-7 injuries (P < 0.01), and pan-plexus injuries (P < 0.0001). A 32% reduction in the odds of favorable motor recovery was observed with a 3-month delay to surgery. Patients who had a nerve transfer 6 months or earlier from injury had 2.4 times the odds of favorable motor recovery (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SFT and DFT provide excellent elbow flexion strength in the majority of patients. Following nerve transfers in individuals with BPI, poorer motor recovery was observed with each 3-month delay to surgery.

Outcomes of Oberlin Transfer in Elderly Patients: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

A case series analysis was performed of upper brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) from low-impact trauma in patients ≥60 years old to assess the effectiveness of nerve transfers, particularly the Oberlin technique, in restoring elbow flexion and to refine clinical decision making for managing traumatic BPIs in this age group.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2024, 11 patients aged 60-72 with traumatic upper BPIs underwent Oberlin technique for elbow flexion; all were evaluated with consistent postsurgical criteria.

RESULTS

Trauma mechanisms included falls (55%), direct trauma (27%), knife wounds (9%), and stretching (9%), with no high-impact trauma cases. Injuries predominantly affected the right side (55%). Elbow flexion strength was assessed using the British Medical Research Council scale. Positive Tinel sign was present in 73% of patients, all reporting pain ranging from mild to severe. At 1 year postsurgery, 64% achieved M4 elbow flexion, 27% achieved M3, and 9% achieved M1 after 4 months. Patients >65 who received surgery within 6 months of injury showed better outcomes except for 1 case. No ulnar nerve deficits were observed. Following surgery, 36% experienced no pain, whereas 64% reported mild pain. Additionally, 64% underwent further nerve transfers to restore shoulder function (spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve), and 18% underwent the Somsakprocedure for deltoid function.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive outcomes were achieved with the Oberlin technique in patients >60 with upper BPIs from low-energy trauma. However, delayed surgery, significant atrophy, and low testosterone levels may affect results. Evaluation of each patient's medical history is crucial before performing this procedure.

Single versus double fascicular transfer for brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

The primary objective of this review was to assess whether double fascicular transfer has superior outcomes compared with single fascicular transfer for reanimation of elbow flexion. In total, 58 studies including 1388 patients (mean age 29 years [SD 8]) were included. Subgroup analysis comparing the severity of brachial plexus injury (C5-C6, C5-C7, C5-C8) showed no significant difference in the recovery of MRC grade 3 and 4. The aggregated mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 38 for the single fascicular transfer group and 27 for the double fascicular transfer group. Meta-regression controlling for level of injury showed that double fascicular transfer and C5-C6 injury were significant predictors of achieving MRC grade 3, while double fascicular transfer and shorter duration of surgical delay were significant predictors of achieving MRC grade 4. When controlling for the level of injury, double fascicular transfer is associated with a greater likelihood of achieving MRC grade 3 and 4 compared to single fascicular transfer. Overall donor site morbidity was not significantly different between single fascicular transfer and double fascicular transfer.

A Multicenter Validation of a Novel Prediction Model for Elbow Flexion Recovery after Nerve Transfer Surgery in Brachial Plexus Injuries

Background

Nerve transfer surgery for brachial plexus injuries exhibits variable success rates, potentially resulting in prolonged limb dysfunction for more than 2 years. A proposed prediction model has been developed to predict the unsuccessful recovery of elbow flexion after the surgery. The model consisted of six variables, namely body mass index 23 kg/m2 or more, smoking, total arm type, donor nerve, ipsilateral upper extremity fracture, and ipsilateral vascular injury. This study aimed to assess the external validity of the model for wider applicability.

Methods

This retrospective analysis examined the medical records of 213 eligible patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries who underwent surgery at two referral centers between July 2008 and June 2022. The prediction model was applied to estimate recovery failure probability, which was compared with the observed outcomes for each patient. Both the original and simplified models were validated for discrimination and calibration using metrics including c-statistic, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration plot, calibration slope, and intercept.

Results

Thirty-two percent of patients experienced unsuccessful elbow flexion recovery. Both the original and simplified models demonstrated good discrimination (c-statistics: 0.748 and 0.759, respectively). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revealed strong agreement between predicted and observed probabilities for both models (P = 0.66 and P = 0.92, respectively). The calibration plot exhibited good agreement, with a calibration slope of 0.928 and an intercept of 0.377.

Conclusions

The prediction model showed strong external validation, confirming its clinical value. High-risk patients should be educated on the risks and benefits of nerve transfer surgery and consider alternative treatments such as primary free functioning muscle transfer.

Self-assessed outcomes following double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion

Background

Double fascicular nerve transfer (DFT) is often performed to re-animate the elbow flexors. Studies of motor recovery following this surgery have exclusively reported on the objective outcome of muscle power. Questionnaire studies allow researchers and clinicians to learn from patients and better direct care towards their needs. To date, no research has focused on self-assessed recovery following DFT for elbow flexion.

Methods

This observational cross-sectional study aimed to give an account of patient-assessed outcomes following DFT. The bespoke questionnaire included: (a) self-reported strength and (b) the Stanmore percentage of normal elbow assessment.

Results

Sixty-two patients participated in the study. Participants were grouped according to time post-surgery. Statistical analysis confirmed that data were comparable between groups (p=0.10).

Self-assessed strength

Median scores were 0.5 kg <2 years post-surgery, 3 kg at 2 to 5 years, 2 kg at 5 to 8 years and 1.3 kg in the >8 years group.

Stanmore Percentage of Normal Elbow Assessment

Mean scores (%) were 35 (SD ± 25) <2 years, 56 (SD ± 31) at 2 to 5 years, 44 (SD ± 25) at 5 to 8 years and 46 (SD ± 29) >8 years groups.

Conclusions

This is the first study of self-assessed recovery following DFT. Scores peaked around 4 years post-operation. Future research should focus on the long-term self-reported outcome of nerve transfer surgery.

Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries: advances and current updates

Nerve grafting, tendon transfer and joint fusion are routinely used to improve the upper limb function in patients with brachial plexus palsies. Newer techniques have been developed that provide additional options for reconstruction. Nerve transfer is a tool for restoring upper limb function in total root avulsions where nerve grafting is not possible. In partial brachial plexus injuries, nerve transfers can greatly improve shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand function. Intraoperative electrical stimulation can be used to diagnose precisely which nerve is injured and to choose which nerve fascicles should be transferred. Finally, measuring the postoperative outcome can improve the evaluation of our techniques. The aim of this article was to present the current techniques used to treat patients with brachial plexus injury.

Brief Electrical Stimulation Promotes Recovery after Surgical Repair of Injured Peripheral Nerves

Injured peripheral nerves regenerate their axons in contrast to those in the central nervous system. Yet, functional recovery after surgical repair is often disappointing. The basis for poor recovery is progressive deterioration with time and distance of the growth capacity of the neurons that lose their contact with targets (chronic axotomy) and the growth support of the chronically denervated Schwann cells (SC) in the distal nerve stumps. Nonetheless, chronically denervated atrophic muscle retains the capacity for reinnervation. Declining electrical activity of motoneurons accompanies the progressive fall in axotomized neuronal and denervated SC expression of regeneration-associated-genes and declining regenerative success. Reduced motoneuronal activity is due to the withdrawal of synaptic contacts from the soma. Exogenous neurotrophic factors that promote nerve regeneration can replace the endogenous factors whose expression declines with time. But the profuse axonal outgrowth they provoke and the difficulties in their delivery hinder their efficacy. Brief (1 h) low-frequency (20 Hz) electrical stimulation (ES) proximal to the injury site promotes the expression of endogenous growth factors and, in turn, dramatically accelerates axon outgrowth and target reinnervation. The latter ES effect has been demonstrated in both rats and humans. A conditioning ES of intact nerve days prior to nerve injury increases axonal outgrowth and regeneration rate. Thereby, this form of ES is amenable for nerve transfer surgeries and end-to-side neurorrhaphies. However, additional surgery for applying the required electrodes may be a hurdle. ES is applicable in all surgeries with excellent outcomes.

Differences in the surgical treatment of adult and pediatric brachial plexus injuries among peripheral nerve surgeons

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral nerve surgeons disagree on the optimal timing and treatment of brachial plexus injuries (BPI). This study aims to survey peripheral nerve surgeons on their management of BPI, including disagreement.

METHODS

Surgeons responded to a case-based survey involving traumatic and birth injuries leading to BPI involving the upper and lower trunks, and pre- and post-ganglionic injuries.

RESULTS

Out of 255 invited surgeons, 154 participated, with specialties of Neurosurgery (33.7%), Plastic surgery (32.5%), and Orthopedics (32.5%). For the adult C5-6 avulsion injury, 97.4% agreed they would operate. There was 46.2% disagreement regarding the pediatric upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity case, and similar disagreement (50.0%) was recorded on exploring the brachial plexus for a pediatric lower trunk injury case. High percentages of surgeons were more likely to explore the plexus, such as at upper BPI. Also, most participants reported nerve transfer for the upper and lower trunk avulsion injuries, but there was 55.6% disagreement regarding nerve transfer for the infant with the upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity. Among those elected to perform nerve transfer, most (70.0%-84.5%) would perform an accessory-to-suprascapular nerve transfer for upper BPI, while brachialis-to-anterior interosseous and supinator branch of the radial nerve-to-posterior interosseous were preferred for lower BPI (30.0%-55.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial disagreement exists among peripheral nerve surgeons in managing adult and pediatric BPI. In adult BPI, most prefer to operate at the time of the presentation and perform extensive nerve transfers. The accessory-suprascapular transfer was recommended for upper BPI, while brachialis and radial nerves were preferred for lower BPI. The most significant disagreements exist in operation and nerve transfer for pediatric upper BPI and brachial plexus explorations. Geography, specialty, and operative volume contribute to the differences seen.

The Effectiveness of Different Nerve Transfers in the Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Adults Following Brachial Plexus Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Restoration of elbow flexion is an important goal in the treatment of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury. Numerous studies have described various nerve transfers for neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve (or its motor branches); however, there is uncertainty over the effectiveness of each method. The aim of this study was to summarize the published evidence in adults with traumatic brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, medRxiv, and bioRxiv were systematically searched from inception to April 12, 2021. We included studies that reported the outcomes of nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion in adults. The primary outcome was elbow flexion of grade 4 (M4) or higher on the British Medical Research Council scale. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses, and heterogeneity was explored using metaregression. Confidence intervals (CIs) were generated to the 95% level.

RESULTS

We included 64 articles, which described 13 different nerve transfers. There were 1,335 adults, of whom 813 (61%) had partial and 522 (39%) had pan-plexus injuries. Overall, 75% of the patients with partial brachial plexus injuries achieved ≥M4 (CI, 69%-80%), and the choice of donor nerve was associated with clinically meaningful differences in the outcome. Of the patients with pan-plexus injuries, 45% achieved ≥M4 (CI, 31%-60%), and overall, each month delay from the time of injury to reconstruction reduced the probability of achieving ≥M4 by 7% (CI, 1%-12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of donor nerve affects the chance of attaining a British Medical Research Council score of ≥4 in upper-trunk reconstruction. For patients with pan-plexus injuries, delay in neurotization may be detrimental to motor outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Trends in Brachial Plexus Surgery: Characterizing Contemporary Practices for Exploration of Supraclavicular Plexus

BACKGROUND

There is variability in treatment strategies for patients with brachial plexus injury (BPI). We used qualitative research methods to better understand surgeons' rationale for treatment approaches. We hypothesized that distal nerve transfers would be preferred over exploration and nerve grafting of the brachial plexus.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with BPI surgeons to discuss 3 case vignettes: pan-plexus injury, upper trunk injury, and lower trunk injury. The interview guide included questions regarding overall treatment strategy, indications and utility of brachial plexus exploration, and the role of nerve grafting and/or nerve transfers. Interview transcripts were coded by 2 researchers. We performed inductive thematic analysis to collate these codes into themes, focusing on the role of brachial plexus exploration in the treatment of BPI.

RESULTS

Most surgeons routinely explore the supraclavicular brachial plexus in situations of pan-plexus and upper trunk injuries. Reasons to explore included the importance of obtaining a definitive root level diagnosis, perceived availability of donor nerve roots, timing of anticipated recovery, plans for distal reconstruction, and the potential for neurolysis. Very few explore lower trunk injuries, citing concern with technical difficulty and unfavorable risk-benefit profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that supraclavicular exploration remains a foundational component of surgical management of BPI, despite increasing utilization of distal nerve transfers. Availability of abundant donor axons and establishing an accurate diagnosis were cited as primary reasons in support of exploration. This analysis of surgeon interviews characterizes contemporary practices regarding the role of brachial plexus exploration in the treatment of BPI.

Traumatic brachial plexus injury: diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are devastating life-altering events, with pervasive detrimental effects on a patient's physical, psychosocial, mental, and financial well-being. This review provides an understanding of the clinical evaluation, surgical indications, and available reconstructive options to allow for the best possible functional outcomes for patients with BPI.

RECENT FINDINGS

The successful management of patients with BPI requires a multidisciplinary team approach including peripheral nerve surgeons, neurology, hand therapy, physical therapy, pain management, social work, and mental health. The initial diagnosis includes a detailed history, comprehensive physical examination, and critical review of imaging and electrodiagnostic studies. Surgical reconstruction depends on the timing of presentation and specific injury pattern. A full spectrum of techniques including neurolysis, nerve grafting, nerve transfers, free functional muscle transfers, tendon transfers, and joint arthrodesis are utilized.

SUMMARY

Despite the devastating nature of BPI injuries, comprehensive care within a multidisciplinary team, open and practical discussions with patients about realistic expectations, and thoughtful reconstructive planning can provide patients with meaningful recovery.

Risk prediction model for unsuccessful elbow flexion recovery after nerve transfer surgery in patients with brachial plexus injury

OBJECTIVE

Nerve transfer surgery has been a mainstay treatment of brachial plexus injury, with varying success rates. Patients undergoing unsuccessful surgery are left with a useless limb for at least 2 years. Preoperative prediction has become a topic of interest to avoid an unsuccessful nerve transfer surgery. This study aimed to find strong predictive factors and develop a prediction model for unsuccessful functional elbow flexion recovery 2 years after a nerve transfer surgery in patients with brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 987 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury who underwent brachial plexus surgery by five hand and microsurgery surgeons at a single tertiary care referral center from December 2001 to July 2018. Four hundred thirty-three patients were eligible for analysis. Patient demographic data, injury factors, surgical details, and postoperative factors were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify strong prognostic factors for unsuccessful nerve transfer surgery for elbow flexion. A simplified model was developed by rounding the coefficient to the nearest 0.5 score or an integer. Both original and simplified models were validated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and bootstrapping.

RESULTS

A full, original prognostic model from a stepwise backward logistic regression consisted of a BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 (p = 0.015), smoking (p = 0.046), total arm-type injury (p = 0.033), donor nerve (p < 0.001), associated upper-extremity fracture (p = 0.013), and associated ipsilateral vascular injury (p = 0.095). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the original and simplified models were 0.765 and 0.766, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good agreement of predicted and observed probability of the original (p = 0.49) and simplified (p = 0.19) models. Bootstrapping estimated an average optimism (1.9%) in the original model and minimal optimism (0.1%) in the simplified model.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model for failed elbow flexion recovery after nerve transfer surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury was developed with good predictive value and internal validity. An alternative treatment, i.e., primary free functioning muscle transfer, should be offered in preoperative counseling in cases of a very high risk of failure.

Nerve Transfers for Elbow Reconstruction in Upper and Extended Upper-Type Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries have been used with increasing frequency because of the higher rate of success and acceptable morbidity. This is especially true in upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To present the clinical outcomes of nerve transfers for elbow flexion in patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was done on all patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries from 2006 to 2017, who underwent nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion. Outcome variables include Filipino version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (FIL-DASH) score, elbow flexion strength and range of motion, and pain. All statistical significance was set at P &lt; .05.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were included. There was a significant improvement in FIL-DASH scores in 28 patients after the nerve transfer procedure. Patients with C56 nerve root injuries and those with more than 2 years' follow-up have a higher percentage of regaining ≥M4 elbow flexion strength. Those with double nerve transfers had a higher percentage of ≥M4 elbow flexion strength, greater range of elbow flexion, and better FIL-DASH scores compared with single nerve transfers, but this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Nerve transfer procedures improve FIL-DASH scores in upper and upper-type brachial plexus injuries. After nerve transfer, stronger elbow flexion can be expected in patients with C56 injuries, and those with longer follow-up.

Upper limb joint coordination preserves hand kinematics after a traumatic brachial plexus injury

Background

Traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI) causes a sensorimotor deficit in upper limb (UL) movements.

Objective

Our aim was to investigate the arm–forearm coordination of both the injured and uninjured UL of TBPI subjects.

Methods

TBPI participants (n = 13) and controls (n = 10) matched in age, gender, and anthropometric characteristics were recruited. Kinematics from the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and index finger markers were collected, while upstanding participants transported a cup to their mouth and returned the UL to a starting position. The UL coordination was measured through the relative phase (RP) between arm and forearm phase angles and analyzed as a function of the hand kinematics.

Results

For all participants, the hand transport had a shorter time to peak velocity (p &lt; 0.01) compared to the return. Also, for the control and the uninjured TBPI UL, the RP showed a coordination pattern that favored forearm movements in the peak velocity of the transport phase (p &lt; 0.001). TBPI participants' injured UL showed a longer movement duration in comparison to controls (p &lt; 0.05), but no differences in peak velocity, time to peak velocity, and trajectory length, indicating preserved hand kinematics. The RP of the injured UL revealed altered coordination in favor of arm movements compared to controls and the uninjured UL (p &lt; 0.001). Finally, TBPI participants' uninjured UL showed altered control of arm and forearm phase angles during the deceleration of hand movements compared to controls (p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion

These results suggest that UL coordination is reorganized after a TBPI so as to preserve hand kinematics.

Clinical Assessment of Functional Recovery Following Nerve Transfer for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries

Surgical reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation are both important for restoring function in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The current study aimed to understand variations in recovery progression among patients with different injury levels after receiving the nerve transfer methods. A total of 26 patients with BPIs participated in a rehabilitation training program over 6 months after nerve reconstruction. The differences between the first and second evaluations and between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPIs were compared. Results showed significant improvements in elbow flexion range (p = 0.001), British Medical Research Council's score of shoulder flexion (p = 0.046), shoulder abduction (p = 0.013), shoulder external rotation (p = 0.020), quantitative muscle strength, and grip strength at the second evaluation for both groups. C5-C6 BPIs patients showed a larger shoulder flexion range (p = 0.022) and greater strength of the shoulder rotator (p = 0.004), elbow flexor (p = 0.028), elbow extensor (p = 0.041), wrist extensor (p = 0.001), and grip force (p = 0.045) than C5-C7 BPIs patients at the second evaluation. Our results indicated different improvements among patients according to injury levels, with quantitative values assisting in establishing goals for interventions.

Outcomes of gracilis free-flap muscle transfers and non-free-flap procedures for restoration of elbow flexion: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Elbow flexion is one of the most important functions to restore following brachial plexus damage. The authors sought to systematically review available evidence to summarize outcomes of free gracilis and non-free muscle transfers in restoring elbow flexion.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched to identify articles reporting on elbow flexion reanimation in terms of transfer failure rates, strengths, range of motion (ROM), and/or Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. A systematic review was chosen to select studies and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. A total of 432 cases were gracilis free-flap muscle transfers (FFMT), and 982 cases were non-free muscle transfers. FFMT were shown to have higher Medical Research Council (MRC) strength scores than non-free muscle transfer groups. However, 42 studies, totaling 1,266 cases, were useful in evaluating graft failure, showing failure (MRC<3) in 77/419 (∼18.4%) of gracilis free-flap transfers and 215/847 (∼25.4%) of non-free muscle transfers. Sixteen articles, 285 cases, were useful to evaluate ROMs (total range: 0-140°), and eight articles, 215 cases, provided DASH scores (total range: 8-90.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Of patients who underwent gracilis FFMT procedures, higher mean strength scores and lower failure rates were observed when compared with non-free muscle transfers. Articles reporting non-free muscle transfer procedures (pectoralis, pedicled, Steindler, vascularized ulnar nerve grafts, Oberlin, single/double nerve transfers) provided comprehensive insight into outcomes and indicated that they may result in pooerer poorer DASH scores and ROM.

Feasibility of the Oberlin Procedure in Late Presentation Cases of C5-C6 and C5-C7 Brachial Plexus Injuries in Adults

Background: Oberlin et al presented a new technique for nerve transfer that completely changed the prognosis of patients with brachial plexus injury. Currently, most of the literature addresses cases submitted to early surgical intervention, before 12 months from injury, showing consistent good results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the Oberlin procedure in late presentation cases (≥12 months), comparing the elbow flexion strength with patients operated earlier. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with partial brachial plexus injuries submitted to the Oberlin procedure. They were divided into 2 groups. Group A included 39 patients operated with <12 months of injury. The mean postoperative follow-up was 22.53 months. The interval from injury to surgery varied from 4 to 11 months (±8.45 months). Group B included 10 patients with surgery ≥12 months after injury. The mean postoperative follow-up was 32 months. The interval from injury to surgery ranged from 12 to 19 months (±15.4 months). Patients were evaluated monthly after surgery and the elbow flexion strength was measured using the British Medical Research Council scale. Results: In Group A, 24 patients presented with either good (M3) or excellent (M4) elbow flexion strength. In Group B, 9 patients presented with either good (M3) or excellent (M4) elbow flexion strength. A significant difference was not seen in the postoperative elbow flexion strength among the 2 groups. Conclusion: Biceps reinnervation with the Oberlin procedure is still feasible and should be attempted after more than 12 months of injury in partial brachial plexus injuries.

The Terminal Anatomy of Phrenic Nerve: a Deeper Look at Diaphragm Innervation Patterns

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are devastating lesions and neurotization is an usually elected surgical therapy. The phrenic nerve has been harvested as motor fibers donor in brachial plexus neurotization, showing great results in terms of motor reinnervation. Unfortunately, these interventions lack solid evidence regarding long-term safety and possible late respiratory function sequelae, raising crescent concerns after the COVID-19 pandemic onset and possibly resulting in reduced propensity to use this technique. The study of the distal anatomy of the phrenic nerves may lead to a better understanding of their branching patterns, and thus the proposition of surgical approaches that better preserve patient respiratory function.

METHODS

Twenty-one phrenic nerves in ten formalized cadavers were scrutinized. Pre-diaphragmatic branching patterns were inspected through analysis of the distance between the piercing site of the nerve at the diaphragm and the cardiac structures, number of divisions, and length from the point where the main trunk emits its branches to the diaphragm.

RESULTS

The main trunk of the right phrenic nerve reaches the diaphragm near the inferior vena cava and branches into three major divisions. The left phrenic nerve reaches the diaphragm in variable locations near the heart, branching into two to five main trunks. Moreover, we noticed a specimen presenting two ipsilateral parallel phrenic nerves.

CONCLUSION

The right phrenic nerve presented greater consistency concerning insertion site, terminal branching point distance to this muscle, and number of rami than the left phrenic nerve.

Optimal Donor Nerve to Restore Elbow Flexion After Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) often lead to devastating upper extremity deficits. Treatment frequently prioritizes restoring elbow flexion through transfer of various donor nerves; however, no consensus identifies optimal donor nerve sources.

OBJECTIVE

To complete a meta-analysis to assess donor nerves for restoring elbow flexion after partial and total BPI (TBPI).

METHODS

Original English language articles on nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion after BPI were included. Using a random-effects model, we calculated pooled, weighted effect size of the patients achieving a composite motor score of ≥M3, with subgroup analyses for patients achieving M4 strength and with TBPI. Meta-regression was performed to assess comparative efficacy of each donor nerve for these outcomes.

RESULTS

Comparison of the overall effect size of the 61 included articles demonstrated that intercostal nerves and phrenic nerves were statistically superior to contralateral C7 (cC7; P = .025, <.001, respectively) in achieving ≥M3 strength. After stratification by TBPI, the phrenic nerve was still superior to cC7 in achieving ≥M3 strength (P = .009). There were no statistical differences among ulnar, double fascicle, or medial pectoral nerves in achieving ≥M3 strength. Regarding M4 strength, the phrenic nerve was superior to cC7 (P = .01) in patients with TBPI and the ulnar nerve was superior to the medial pectoral nerve (P = .036) for partial BPI.

CONCLUSION

Neurotization of partial BPI or TBPI through the intercostal nerve or phrenic nerve may result in functional advantage over cC7. In patients with upper trunk injuries, neurotization using ulnar, median, or double fascicle nerve transfers has similarly excellent functional recovery.

Functional reconstructions using only ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve-innervated muscles for traumatic musculocutaneous, median and radial nerve palsies

A 20-year-old right-handed fisherman experienced a severe injury in a high-energy traffic accident. These injuries included a shaft fracture of the right humerus, open comminuted fracture of the right forearm and multiple peripheral nerve palsies involving the musculocutaneous, median and radial nerves. Six months after the initial treatment, the patient was referred to our hand surgeons for further treatment. Several operations for functional reconstruction using only the ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve-innervated muscles were performed: the main procedures included a partial ulnar nerve transfer for elbow flexion, flexor carpi ulnaris transfer for reconstruction of wrist and finger extension and opponensplasty using the abductor digiti minimi. Three years after the initial injury, the patient had relatively good function including elbow flexion and stable side pinch and grasp. Functional reconstruction using a combination of the ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve-innervated muscles may be useful in specific cases involving multiple peripheral nerve injuries.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

»

The incidence of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) in the United States is declining and now occurs in <1 per 1,000 births.

»

The gold standard for predicting the need for early intervention remains serial examination.

»

Early treatment of BPBI with reconstructive surgery requires the ability to perform both interposition nerve grafting and nerve transfers.

»

Given the heterogeneity of lesions, the evidence is largely limited to retrospective comparative studies and case series.

Brachial Plexus Injuries - Review of the Anatomy and the Treatment Options

Brachial plexus injuries are still challenging for every surgeon taking part in treating patients with BPI. Injuries of the brachial plexus can be divided into injuries of the upper trunk, extended upper trunk, injuries of the lower trunk and swinging hand where all of the roots are involved in this type of the injury. Brachial plexus can be divided in five anatomical sections from its roots to its terminal branches: roots, trunks, division, cords and terminal branches. Brachial plexus ends up as five terminal branches, responsible for upper limb innervation, musculocutaneous, median nerve, axillary nerve, radial and ulnar nerve. According to the findings from the preoperative investigation combined with clinically found functional deficit, the type of BPI will be confirmed and that is going to determine which surgical procedure, from variety of them (neurolysis, nerve graft, neurotization, arthrodesis, tendon transfer, free muscle transfer, bionic reconstruction) is appropriate for treating the patient.

Restoration of elbow flexion in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury - a quantitative analysis of results of single versus double nerve transfer

BACKGROUND

Restoration of elbow flexion is one of the key components of adult brachial plexus surgery. Nerve transfers are routinely used to attain elbow flexion.

PURPOSE

This study aims to quantify the recovery of elbow flexion power and to compare the outcome following single nerve transfer and double nerve transfer to branches of the musculocutaneous nerve in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with traumatic upper brachial plexus injury who underwent nerve transfer of the musculocutaneous nerve with either Ulnar nerve fascicles (SN) or both Ulnar and Median nerve fascicles (DN) for restoring elbow flexion. Patients with a minimum follow up of 18 months after surgery were included in this study. Elbow flexion strength was quantified using a force transducer and software module and the results were compared between the two groups.

RESULT

The median strength of elbow flexion was 14.3 Newton meter. In the SN group, the mean strength of elbow flexion was 5.4 ± 5 Nm, and for DN group it was 20.4 ± 9.9 Nm. Elbow flexion strength following DN procedure was significantly better when compared with SN.

CONCLUSION

The additional nerve transfer of median nerve fascicles with musculocutaneous nerve branch to the brachialis muscle does not add clinically obvious morbidity to the patient but has definite benefit as observed in this study. We advocate double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion in upper brachial plexus injuries if the median and ulnar nerve functions are normal.

Ulnar and Median Fascicular Transfers for Elbow Flexion-Predicting Outcomes in a Heterogeneous Patient Group and Implications for Surgical Planning

Purpose: To measure the outcomes in patients undergoing nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration, and compare patient outcomes based on the pre-operative fascicular transfer plan. Methods: Single surgeon series of 48 consecutive patients who underwent median and/or ulnar fascicular nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration to treat palsies of the brachial plexus or musculocutaneous nerve. Outcomes measured were Medical Research Council (MRC) power grade, strength in kilograms, and time taken to recover function. Results: Overall, 96% of patients achieved MRC M4 or greater power. The subgroup who were planned for, and particularly those who then underwent, double as opposed to single fascicular transfer, had significantly better results. Conclusions: Overall results were excellent. Double fascicular transfers were superior, with no failures in this group. If pre-operatively a single fascicle transfer alone is planned due to a paucity of expendable donors, the predicted outcomes are worse and other treatment options should be considered.

Long-term evaluation of hand function in children undergoing Oberlin and Oberlin-like procedures for reinnervation of the biceps muscle

PURPOSE

Long-term evaluation of hand function in children who underwent transfer procedures to reinnervate the biceps muscle, using fascicles from the ulnar and median nerves as donors.

METHODS

In the last follow-up evaluation, the children underwent a neurological examination, and their hand status was classified according to the Raimondi grading system for hand function. Two physical measurements, the child health assessment questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Sollerman hand function test, were applied to assess upper extremity function.

RESULTS

Eight children were re-evaluated. In four the donor fascicle was from the ulnar nerve and in four from the median nerve. The average interval between surgery and the last evaluation was 8.3 years (range 6-10 years). Five patients scored 5 points in the Raimondi grading system, and 3 patients scored 4 points. The results from the CHAQ ranged from 0.03 to 0.41. The results from the Sollerman test were between 60 and 77 for the affected upper limb and between 65 and 79 for the dominant upper limb.

CONCLUSION

Nerve transfer of a fascicle from the ulnar or median nerve to the biceps motor branch in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy does not result in hand dysfunction.

Double-Nerve Transfer to the Axillary Nerve in Traumatic Upper Trunk Brachial Plexus Injuries Using an Axillary Approach: Anatomical Description and Preliminary Case Series

BACKGROUND

Restoration of shoulder external rotation remains challenging in patients with C5/C6 brachial plexus injuries (BPI).

OBJECTIVE

To describe a double-nerve transfer to the axillary nerve (AN), targeting both its anterior and posterior motor branches, through an axillary route.

METHODS

A total of 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric brachial plexuses were dissected. Using an axillary approach, the infraclavicular brachial plexus terminal branches were exposed, including the axillary, ulnar, and radial nerves. Under microscopic magnification, the triceps long head motor branch (TLHMB), anteromedial fascicles of the ulnar nerve (UF), the anterior motor branch of the axillary nerve (AAMB), and the teres minor motor branch (TMMB) were dissected and transected to simulate 2 nerve transfers, THLMB-AAMB and UF-TMMB. Several anatomical criteria were assessed, including the overlaps between fascicles when placed side-by-side. Six patients with C5/C6 BPI were then operated on using this technique.

RESULTS

TLHMB-AAMB and UF-TMMB transfers could be simulated in all specimens, with mean overlaps of 37.1 mm and 6.5 mm, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 23 mo, all patients had recovered grade-3 strength or more in the deltoid and teres minor muscles. Mean active shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation with the arm 90° abducted were of 128°, 117°, and 51°, respectively. No postoperative motor deficit was found in the UF territory.

CONCLUSION

A double-nerve transfer, based on radial and ulnar fascicles, appears to be an adequate option to reanimate both motor branches of the AN, providing satisfactory shoulder active elevations and external rotation in C5/C6 BPI patients.

GRACILIS MUSCLE TRANSFER TO ELBOW FLEXION IN BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURIES

Objective:

Brachial plexus injury can lead to significant functional deficit for the patient. Elbow flexion restoration is a priority in surgical treatment. Free functional muscle transfer is an option for early or late treatment failure. This study evaluated patient characteristics and elbow flexion muscle strength after gracilis functioning muscle transfer.

Methods:

Medical records of 95 patients operated from 2003 to 2019 were analyzed and the following variables recorded: age, gender, nerve transfer used to motorize the gracilis muscle, time between trauma and surgery, age at surgery and elbow flexion strength after a minimum of 12 months following functioning muscle transfer.

Results:

87 patients were included, averaging 30 years of age (17 to 57 years). Fifty-five achieved elbow flexion muscle strength ≥ M3 (55/87, 65%), with a mean follow-up of 37 months. The nerves used for activation of the transferred gracilis were: 45 spinal accessory, 10 intercostal, 8 median n. fascicles, 22 ulnar n. fascicles and 2 phrenic nerves.

Conclusion:

Functional muscle transfer is a viable surgical procedure for elbow flexion in chronic traumatic brachial plexus injuries in adults. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.

Surgical reconstructions for adult brachial plexus injuries. Part I: Treatments for combined C5 and C6 injuries, with or without C7 injuries

Brachial plexus injuries will cause a significantly decreased quality of life. Patients with upper arm type brachial plexus injuries, which means C5 and C6 roots injury, will lose their shoulder elevation/abduction/external rotation, and elbow flexion function. Additional elbow, wrist, and hand extension function deficit will occur in patients with C7 root injury. With the advances of reconstructive procedures, the upper arm brachial plexus injuries can be successfully restored through nerve repair, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, muscle / tendon transfer and free functioning muscle transfer. In this review article, we summarized the various reconstructive procedures to restore the function of shoulder and elbow. Nowadays, the upper arm type BPI can be treat with satisfied outcomes (80-90% successful rate).

Intercostal or ulnar nerve: Which donor nerve is to be used for reanimation of elbow flexion?

BACKGROUND

In total brachial plexus injury, intercostal nerves (ICNs) are used as donor nerves to restore the elbow flexion; albeit in upper brachial plexus injury (BPI), ulnar nerve provides a source of motor axons for this purpose. The present study set out to compare the restoration of elbow flexion by using these two donor nerves.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2013, 24 adult patients with upper-middle BPI and 15 patients with total BPI undergoing elbow flexion restoration surgery were studied. Motor fascicle of flexor carpi ulnaris branch of ulnar nerve (mFCU nerve) procedure was utilized in upper-middle BPI, as well as transfer of ICN to biceps branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in total BPI. Both techniques included sectioning, rerouting, and direct suturing of the biceps branch of the MCN. Follow-up consisted serial clinical examinations and EMG-NCV tests. Motor strength was recorded according to the British Medical Research Council grading system in that the results were reported as nonfunctional (grades M0-M2) and functional (grades M3-M5).

RESULT

No significant difference was documented between the Oberlin procedure and ICN-MCN transfer in terms of reinnervation results (P = 0.6). However, a significant difference in restoration of muscle force was found between the mFCU (95.83%) and ICN-MCN transfers (66.66%) (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The evidence from the present study indicates that although ICN-MCN transfer is a viable method for reanimation of elbow flexion in BPI, mFCU nerve is a better donor if exists.

Repair strategies for injured peripheral nerve: Review

Compromised functional regains in about half of the patients following surgical nerve repair pose a serious socioeconomic burden to the society. Although surgical strategies such as end-to-end neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting and nerve transfer are widely applied in distal injuries leading to optimal recovery; however in proximal nerve defects functional outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Biomedical engineering approaches unite the efforts of the surgeons, engineers and biologists to develop regeneration facilitating structures such as extracellular matrix based supportive polymers and tubular nerve guidance channels. Such polymeric structures provide neurotrophic support from injured nerve stumps, retard the fibrous tissue infiltration and guide regenerating axons to appropriate targets. The development and application of nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) to treat nerve gap injuries offer clinically relevant and feasible solutions. Enhanced understanding of the nerve regeneration processes and advances in NGCs design, polymers and fabrication strategies have led to developing modern NGCs with superior regeneration-conducive capacities. Current review focuses on the advances in surgical and engineering approaches to treat peripheral nerve injuries. We suggest the incorporation of endothelial cell growth promoting cues and factors into the NGC interior for its possible enhancement effects on the axonal regeneration process that may result in substantial functional outcomes.

Long-term disuse of the hand affects motor imagery ability in patients with complete brachial plexus palsy

The purpose of this study was to examine motor imagery ability in patients with peripheral nerve disorder using the hand mental rotation task. Five patients with left total avulsion brachial plexus palsy (BPP) and 16 healthy age-matched adults participated in this study. The mean±SD time from the injury was 103.6±49.7 months. Participants performed a hand mental rotation task as the motor imagery task; outcome measures included the reaction time from cognizing hand stimuli to the judgment of hand laterality (right or left) and the error rate. Patients also completed the Hand 20 questionnaire to assess the use of their affected limb. Log-transformed reaction times of the affected limb in patients with BPP were significantly higher than those of the unaffected limb and the left-sided limb of the healthy participants. Log-transformed reaction times of the unaffected limb in patients were significantly higher than those of the right-sided limb in healthy participants. Log-transformed error rate did not differ between patients and healthy participants. According to the results of the Hand 20 questionnaire, patients with BPP hardly used their affected limb because of severe sensory-motor dysfunction. Motor imagery ability of the affected and unaffected limbs in patients with complete BPP may be decreased owing to long-term disuse. These findings suggest that long-term disuse in those with severe peripheral nerve disorders could affect motor imagery ability of both the affected and unaffected limbs.

Partial ulnar nerve transfer to the branch of the long head of the triceps to recover elbow extension in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsy

Elbow flexion is the first goal in upper partial brachial plexus palsy treatment. However, elbow extension is essential for daily living activities. To recover this function, one fascicle of ulnar nerve can be transferred to the branch of the long head of the triceps, but this procedure has been previously published in only two patients. The goal of our study is to assess a larger series of transfers of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps to help patients recover elbow extension. Ten male patients with C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus injuries underwent operation. For shoulder recovery, we transferred the spinal accessory nerve and rhomboid nerve. For elbow flexion, one fascicle of median nerve was transferred to the nerve of the biceps. For elbow extension, we transferred one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps. Tendon transfers were performed for wrist and finger extension. Nine patients recovered M4 elbow flexion and extension. One patient had M3 elbow extension and flexion. Average active shoulder elevation was 85° and average active shoulder external rotation was 65° All patients recovered finger and wrist extension. The classical techniques of grafts or phrenic or intercostal nerve transfers to recover elbow extension are not always reliable, according to the literature. Because the harvested ulnar nerve motor fascicle is close to the branch of the long head of the triceps, the recovery time for this procedure is shorter than that of other described nerve transfers. The isolated recovery of the reinnervated long head of the triceps muscle excludes spontaneous recovery occasionally noted in upper root plexus injuries. The transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps is reliable for active elbow extension recovery in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsies.

Reconstruction of elbow flexion with a modified Oberlin procedure: A comparative study

INTRODUCTION

In upper brachial plexus injuries (C5-C6-C7), selective nerve transfers appear as a favourable technique. For this purpose, transfer of an ulnar nerve fascicle to the biceps motor branch (Oberlin's procedure) is often used. In this paper we present our modified Oberlin technique, as well as a comparison of this method with the classic Oberlin procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present two groups of patients that where operated by two different surgeons. The first group, consisting of 16 patients was treated with the classic Oberlin procedure. The second group included 5 patients treated with a modified Oberlin procedure, where two fascicles from the ulnar nerve were transferred to both the motor branch of the biceps and the motor branch of the brachialis muscles.

RESULTS

In the last follow-up of the 16 patients from the first group with the classic Oberlin procedure, 15 patients (93.75%) had Medical Research Council (MRC) grade of biceps strength 4 and 1 patient (6.25%) had MRC grade 3, whereas in the group where the modified Oberlin procedure was used the muscle strength was very durable with 4 out of 5 the patients reached MRC grade of 4+ and one MRC grade of 4, and with a mean elbow strength at 5.4 kg (3-8 kg). No sensitivity or motor problems were encountered on the ulnar territories for both groups.

CONCLUSION

With the modified Oberlin technique, the median nerve is reserved and both elbow flexors are innervated. The results of this technique compare favourably with those of other methods. Thus, we propose using the double fascicle transfer from the ulnar nerve to both elbow flexors in order to restore a strong elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries.

Restoration of Elbow Flexion with a Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap to a Brachial Plexus Injury at the Terminal Nerve Level

A pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap is a reliable reconstructive method for elbow flexion, though there are no reports regarding its application to a terminal nerve level injury of the brachial plexus. A 29-year-old man presented with dysfunction of elbow flexion, wrist extension, and finger extension. Physical examination and electromyography showed that the palsy was caused by an injury at the terminal nerve level of the brachial plexus without dysfunction of the axillary nerve. Bipolar transfer of LD for reconstruction of elbow flexion and subsequent tendon transfer for wrist and finger extension were performed. The final British Medical Research Council grade was 4 for elbow flexion, and active range of motion was 0/135. An injury at the terminal nerve level of the brachial plexus should be listed in the differential diagnosis of elbow flexion dysfunction even if shoulder function is intact, and a suitable reconstructive method for this atypical type of palsy could be bipolar transfer of a LD flap.

Histologic Analysis of Sensory and Motor Axons in Branches of the Human Brachial Plexus

BACKGROUND

The topographic distribution through histologic analysis of motor and sensory axons within peripheral nerves at the brachial plexus level is not clearly defined, as there has previously been little need to appreciate this microanatomy. A desire to better understand the topography of fascicle groups developed with the introduction of targeted muscle reinnervation.

METHODS

Fourteen bilateral brachial plexus specimens from seven fresh human cadavers were harvested at the time of organ donation, and immunofluorescent staining of motor and sensory nerves with choline acetyltransferase and Neurofilament 200 was performed to determine whether a consistent somatotopic orientation exists at the brachial plexus level.

RESULTS

There was significant variability in the number of fascicles at the level of the brachial plexus. Qualitative analysis of choline acetyltransferase staining demonstrated that although motor axons tended to be grouped in clusters, there were high degrees of variability in somatotopic orientation across specimens. The radial nerve demonstrated the highest number of total myelinated axons, whereas the median nerve exhibited the greatest number of motor axons. The ulnar nerve contained only 13 percent motor axons, which was significantly lower than the median, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no consistent somatotopic organization of motor and sensory axons of the mixed major nerves of the arm just distal to the brachial plexus, but clustering of motor axons may facilitate the splitting of nerves into primarily "motor" and "sensory" fascicles.

Factors associated with failed ulnar nerve fascicle to biceps motor branch transfer: a case control study

We sought to identify predictors of failed ulnar nerve fascicle (to flexor carpi ulnaris) to biceps motor branch transfer. A retrospective review of adult brachial plexus patients treated with flexor carpi ulnaris to biceps transfer with a minimum 1-year follow-up was performed. Failure, defined as modified British Medical Research Council grade <3 elbow flexion was compared with randomly selected controls (M ≥ 4-). Ninety-one patients, of which 80% regained >M3 flexion met criteria. Eighteen failures and 18 controls, with similar follow-up (20 vs 23 months) were evaluated. Preoperative flexor carpi ulnaris weakness (M < 5) was significantly more common in failures (78% vs 33%). The rate of flexor carpi ulnaris recovery after operation was significantly higher in controls (86% vs 7%). Increased failure risk can be expected with impaired preoperative flexor carpi ulnaris function. The challenge is how to identify which patients will regain near normal flexor carpi ulnaris strength as excellent outcomes can be obtained. Level of evidence: III.

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF OBERLIN PROCEDURE

Objective:

To evaluate the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury undergoing the Oberlin procedure.

Methods:

Eighteen patients were assessed, comprising 17 men (94.4%) and 1 woman (5.6%), mean age 29.5 years (range 17-46 years), with upper traumatic brachial plexus injury (C5-C6 and C5-C7). We assessed active range of motion of the elbow, elbow flexion muscle strength and hand-grip strength, and applied the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire.

Results:

Four patients (22.2%) did not achieve effective elbow flexion strength (BMRC Grade 3). Mean active range of motion was 100.2° (±45.6°), and we observed a mean percentage of strength recovery relative to the contralateral limb of 35.5% (0-66.3%). Elbow flexion (p = 0.0001) and hand-grip (p = 0.0001) strength levels were lower on the affected side.

Conclusion:

The surgical technique described by Oberlin for brachial plexus injuries proved effective for restoring elbow flexion and produced no functional sequelae in the hand. Bicep strength outcomes were better when surgery was performed within 12 months of injury. Level of evidence II, retrospective study.

Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries

Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries are devastating life-altering injuries occurring with increasing frequency. Evaluation includes a detailed physical examination and radiologic and electrodiagnostic studies. Critical concepts in surgical management include knowledge of injury patterns, timing of surgery, prioritization in restoration of function, and management of patient expectations. Options for treatment include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or nerve transfers and should be generally performed within 6 months of injury. The use of free functioning muscle transfers can improve function both in the acute and late setting. Modern patient-specific management can often permit consistent restoration of elbow flexion and shoulder stability with the potential of prehension of the hand. Understanding the basic concepts of management of this injury is essential for all orthopaedic surgeons who treat trauma patients.

Combined flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor carpi radialis transfer for restoring elbow function after brachial plexus injury

The result of combined agonist and antagonist muscle innervation in traumatic brachial plexus injury through the intraplexal fascicle nerve transfers with the same donor function has not yet been reported. We describe a patient with a C5-C7 traumatic brachial plexus injury who had a combined transfer of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) fascicle to the musculocutaneous nerve and the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) fascicle to the radial nerve of the triceps. The patient returned for his follow-up visit 2 years after his surgery. The muscle strengths of his triceps and biceps were Medical Research Council grade 2 and 0, respectively. Compared with his uninjured side, his grip strength was 9.8%, and his pinch strength was 14.2%. Our case report provides insights on result of combined agonist and antagonist muscle innervation through combining the motor fascicle of the FCR and FCU to restore the elbow flexor and extensor. The result may not be promising.

Development of a mouse nerve-transfer model for brachial plexus injury

Nerve transfer involves the use of a portion of a healthy nerve to repair an injured nerve, and the process has been used to alleviate traumatic brachial plexus injuries in humans. Study of the neural mechanisms that occur during nerve transfer, however, requires the establishment of reliable experimental models. In this study, we developed an ulnar-musculocutaneous nerve-transfer model wherein the biceps muscle of a mouse was re-innervated using a donor ulnar nerve. Similar muscle action potentials were detected in both the end-to-end suture of the transected nerve (correctrepair) group and the ulnar-musculocutaneous nerve-transfer group. Also, re-innervated acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters and muscle spindles were observed in both procedures. There were fewer re-innervated AChR clusters in the nerve transfer group than in the correct repair group at 4 weeks, but the numbers were equal at 24 weeks following surgery. Thus, our ulnar-musculocutaneous nerve-transfer model allowed physiological and morphological evaluation for re-innervation process in mice and revealed the delay of this process during nerve transfer procedure. This model will provide great opportunities to study regeneration, re-innervation, and functional recovery induced via nerve transfer procedures.

Development of a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (COMBINE): study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI) involves major trauma to the large nerves of the arm which control the movement and sensation. Fifty per cent of injuries result in complete paralysis of the arm with many other individuals having little movement, sensation loss and unremitting pain. The injury often causes severe and permanent disability affecting work and social life, with an estimated cost to the National Health Service and the economy of £35 million per annum. Advances in microsurgery have resulted in an increase in interventions aimed at reconstructing these injuries. However, data to guide evidence-based decisions is lacking. Different outcomes are used across studies to assess the effectiveness of treatments. This has impeded our ability to synthesise results to determine which treatments work best. Studies frequently report short-term clinical outcomes but rarely report longer term outcomes and those focused on quality of life. This project aims to produce a core outcome set (COS) for surgical and conservative management of TBPI. The TBPI COS will contain a minimum set of outcomes to be reported and measured in effectiveness studies and collected through routine clinical care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This mixed-methods project will be conducted in two phases. In phase 1 a long list of patient-reported and clinical outcomes will be identified through a systematic review. Interviews will then explore outcomes important to patients. In phase 2, the outcomes identified across the systematic review, and the interviews will be included in a three-round online Delphi exercise aiming to reach consensus on the COS. The Delphi process will include patient and healthcare participants. A consensus meeting will be held to achieve the final COS.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The use of a COS in TBPI will increase the relevance of research and clinical care to all stakeholders, facilitate evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision making. The study has ethical approval.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

CRD42018109843.

Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Ideal timeframes for operating on traumatic stretch and blunt brachial plexus injuries remain a topic of debate. Whereas on the one hand spontaneous recovery might occur, on the other hand, long delays are believed to result in poorer functional outcomes. The goal of this review is to assess the optimal timeframe for surgical intervention for traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in January 2017 in PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Search terms related to "brachial plexus injury" and "timing" were used. Obstetric plexus palsies were excluded. Qualitative synthesis was performed on all studies. Timing of operation and motor outcome were collected from individual patient data. Patients were categorized into 5 delay groups (0-3, 3-6, 6-9, 9-12, and > 12 months). Median delays were calculated for Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle grade ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 recoveries.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included after full-text screening. Most articles showed significantly better motor outcome with delays to surgery less than 6 months, with some studies specifying even shorter delays. Pain and quality of life scores were also significantly better with shorter delays. Nerve reconstructions performed after long time intervals, even more than 12 months, can still be useful. All papers reporting individual-level patient data described a combined total of 569 patients; 65.5% of all patients underwent operations within 6 months and 27.4% within 3 months. The highest percentage of ≥ MRC grade 3 (89.7%) was observed in the group operated on within 3 months. These percentages decreased with longer delays, with only 35.7% ≥ MRC grade 3 with delays > 12 months. A median delay of 4 months (IQR 3-6 months) was observed for a recovery of ≥ MRC grade 3, compared with a median delay of 7 months (IQR 5-11 months) for ≤ MRC grade 3 recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review show that in stretch and blunt injury of the brachial plexus, the optimal time to surgery is shorter than 6 months. In general, a 3-month delay appears to be appropriate because while recovery is better in those operated on earlier, this must be considered given the potential for spontaneous recovery.

For how long do denervated muscles in children retain the ability to regenerate?: Restoration of elbow flexion and shoulder function by partial nerve transfer in a child with long-standing poliomyelitis-like paralysis

BACKGROUND

In infant poliomyelitis or poliomyelitis-like paresis, there has been no means of treating residual paralysis and the policy has been to wait until an affected infant has grown sufficiently to enable tendon transfer or arthrodesis. However, recent reports have described relatively good results for early surgical intervention in the form of nerve transfer.

METHODS

In a 4-year and 6-month-old child we transferred a partial ulnar nerve for elbow flexor reconstruction even 3 years and 10 months after the onset of poliomyelitis-like palsy and also transferred partial accessory and radial nerves for shoulder function restoration 6 months after the first operation.

RESULTS

Elbow flexor restored M4 on the British Medical Research Council scale. The shoulder subluxation resolved, however, the strengths of the deltoid and infraspinatus remained almost M1. At the most recent clinical examination, the patient was 18 years old and the active range of motion of patient's left elbow was 0°-125°, and those of the whole shoulder girdle were abduction 35°, flexion 60°, extension 30° and external rotation 0°.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes we achieved may support partial nerve transfer techniques as viable treatment options for persistent long-standing motor deficits following poliomyelitis-like palsy in children. However, we recommend performing partial nerve transfer as early as possible after recovery from flaccid paralysis and also use of nerves that derive from narrow spinal cord segments. After denervation, children's neuromuscular systems seem to have the ability to regenerate after a much longer period than has generally been believed. This speculation is based on only a single case report; thus, more experience is needed before this generalization can confidently be made.

DOES COGNITIVE CAPACITY INTERFERE WITH THE OUTCOME OF OBERLIN TRANSFER?

Objective:

To determine the relationship between the functional outcome achieved following Oberlin transfer, the cognitive level of the patient, and the time elapsed between the trauma event and surgery.

Methods:

Eighteen patients with a traumatic injury to the brachial plexus (C5-C6 and C5-C7) were evaluated. Seventeen (94.4%) patients were males and one (5.6%) was female, with a mean age of 29.5 years (range 17-46 years). We evaluated the active range of motion, elbow flexion strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and determined the correlation between the procedural outcome and the patient's cognitive level, as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE).

Results:

We found statistically significant correlations between the MMSE scale and strength recovery (84.4%, p<0.001), which was classified as excellent, and between the MMSE and British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scales (78.4%, p>0.001), which classified cognitive level as good.

Conclusions:

We found a positive correlation between cognitive capacity and functional outcome of patients submitted to Oberlin surgery. The time elapsed between trauma and the surgical procedure showed an inversely proportional correlation with the strength of recovery. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective Study.

Elbow flexion reconstruction with nerve transfer or grafting in patients with brachial plexus injuries: A systematic review and comparison study

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic brachial plexus (BP) palsy was used to be treated by reconstruction with nerve grafts. For the last two decades, nerve transfers have gained popularity and believed to be more effective than nerve grafting. The aim of this systematic review was to compare elbow flexion restoration with nerve transfers or nerve grafting after traumatic BP injury.

METHODS

PRISMA-IPD structure was used for 52 studies included. Patients were allocated as C5-C6 (n = 285), C5-C6-C7 (n = 150), and total BP injury (n = 245) groups. In each group, two treatment modalities were compared, and effects of age and preoperative interval were analyzed.

RESULTS

In C5-C6 injuries, 93.1% of nerve transfer patients achieved elbow flexion force ≥M3, which was significantly better when compared to 69.2% of nerve graft patients (p < 0.001). For improved outcomes of nerve transfer patients, shorter preoperative interval was a significant factor in all injury patterns (p < 0.001 for C5-C6 injuries and total BP injuries, p = 0.018 for C5-C6-C7 injuries), and young age was a significant factor in total BP injury pattern (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses showed that nerve transfers appear superior to nerve graftings especially in patients with a C5-C6 injury. Unnecessary delays in surgery must be prevented, and younger patients may have more chance for better recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.