RISK FACTORS FOR RESPIRATORY FAILURE FOLLOWING OPERATIVE STABILIZATION OF THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES

Early Versus Late Spine Surgery in Severely Injured Patients-Which Is the Appropriate Timing for Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study conducted at tertiary spinal trauma referral center.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine if early definitive management of spine fractures in patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) shortens the intubation time and the length of stay (LOS), without increasing mortality.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients admitted to the ICU and submitted to surgical stabilization of spine fractures were reviewed over a 10-year period. Time to surgery, number of fractured vertebrae, degree of neurological injury, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), ASA score and associated trauma were evaluated. Surgeries performed on the first 72 hours after trauma were defined as "early surgeries." Intubation time, LOS on ICU, overall LOS and mortality rate were compared between patients operated early and late.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included, 21 with cervical fractures, 23 thoracic and 6 lumbar. Baseline characteristics did not differ between patients in both groups. Patients with early surgical stabilization had significantly shorter intubation time, ICU-LOS and overall LOS, with no differences in terms of mortality rate. After multivariate adjustments overall LOS was significantly shorter in patients operated earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Early spinal stabilization (<72 hours) of severely injured patients is beneficial and shortens the intubation time, ICU-LOS and overall LOS, with no differences in terms of mortality rate. Although some patients may require a delay in treatment due to necessary medical stabilization, every reasonable effort should be made to treat patients with unstable spinal fractures as early as possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OF THE STUDY

Level III.

Secondary spinal cord changes and spinal deformity following traumatic spinal cord injury

Secondary spinal cord changes can follow spinal cord injuries (SCIs). This retrospective study was to uncover the chronic secondary changes that affect the spinal cord following severe injuries and to evaluate the influence of residual spinal deformity in the development of posttraumatic spinal cord changes. Fifty-eight patients (39 male, 19 female) with complete traumatic SCI and recent Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. A minimum of 2 years duration between trauma and MRI study was required (mean 2.9 years [2.1-4.7]). Two groups of patients were formed: with spinal deformity (and or spinal canal compromise) and without spinal deformity (and or spinal canal compromise). MRI of the injured spine demonstrated four major types of spinal cord changes; these are spinal cord atrophy, myelomalacia, syrinx, and focal cyst formation. The correlation of these changes to the presence of spinal deformity and or spinal canal compromise was also studied. Twenty-three patients (40%) of the studied population had more than 30° kyphosis and or 50% compromise of the spinal canal. Chronic spinal cord changes occurred in 25 patients (43%), 17 of these changes occurred in patients with spinal deformity and the remaining 8 occurred in patients without spinal deformity or canal compromise (p ≤ .05). The prevalence of spinal cord atrophy and focal cysts was significantly higher in patients with residual deformity and or spinal canal compromise (p ≤ .05). The authors recommend proper spinal cord decompression and fixation for patients with complete SCI to reduce the chance of secondary SCI.

Definitive Surgery Is Safe in Borderline Patients Who Respond to Resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesize that in adequately resuscitated borderline polytrauma patients with long bone fractures (femur and tibia) or pelvic fractures, early (within 4 days) definitive stabilization (EDS) can be performed without an increase in postoperative ventilation and postoperative complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

In total, 103 patients were included in this study; of whom, 18 (17.5%) were female and 85 (82.5%) were male. These patients were borderline trauma patients who had the following parameters before definitive surgery, normal coagulation profile, lactate of <2.5 mmol/L, pH of ≥7.25, and base excess of ≥5.5.

INTERVENTION

These patients were treated according to Early Total Care, definitive surgery on day of admission, or Damage Control Orthopaedics principles, temporizing external fixation followed by definitive surgery at a later date. Timing of definitive surgical fixation was recorded as EDS or late definitive surgical fixation (>4 days).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measured was the duration of ventilation more than 3 days post definitive surgery and presence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (34.0%) received Early Total Care, whereas 68 (66.0%) patients were treated with Damage Control Orthopaedics. In total, 51 (49.5%) of all patients had late definitive surgery, whereas 52 patients (50.5%) had EDS. On logistic regression, the following factors were found to be predictive of higher rates of postoperative ventilation ≥ 3 days, units of blood transfused, and time to definitive surgery > 4 days. Increased age, head abbreviated injury score of 3 or more and time to definitive surgery were found to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline polytrauma patients with no severe soft tissue injuries, such as chest or head injuries, may be treated with EDS if adequately resuscitated with no increase in need for postoperative ventilation and complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early fixation of traumatic spinal fractures and the reduction of complications in the absence of neurological injury: a retrospective cohort study from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program

OBJECTIVE

The optimal timing of operative stabilization of patients with traumatic spinal fractures without spinal cord injury (SCI) has not been established. The challenges of early operative intervention, which may require prone positioning in a patient with multisystem injuries, must be balanced with the disadvantages of prolonged immobilization. The authors set out to define the optimal timing of surgical repair of traumatic spinal fractures in patients without SCI and the effect of delayed repair on the incidence of major complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data derived from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Adult trauma patients who underwent operative fixation of a spinal fracture within 7 days of admission were included. Patients with SCI were excluded. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a major complication. Secondary outcomes included death and length of stay. Restricted cubic splines were used to model the nonlinear effects of time to spinal fixation and determine a threshold beyond which stabilization was associated with a higher rate of major complications. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were then used to derive estimates for the association between delayed fixation and major complications.

RESULTS

The authors identified 19,310 patients treated at 389 centers who met the inclusion criteria. Modeling identified fixation beyond 24 hours as a risk for major complications. Adjusting for potential confounders using multivariable logistic regression showed that late fixation was associated with a 1.30 (95% CI 1.15-1.46) times increased odds of developing a major complication. After propensity score matching, late fixation remained associated with a 1.25 (95% CI 1.13-1.39) times increased risk of experiencing a major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of clear contraindications, surgeons should strive to stabilize traumatic spinal fractures without SCI within 24 hours. Early fixation can be expected to reduce major complications by 25%-30%.

Timing of intervention for spinal injury in patients with polytrauma

OBJECTIVE

The optimal timing of surgical intervention of spinal fractures in patients with polytrauma is still controversial. In the setting of trauma to multiple organ systems, an inappropriately timed definitive spine surgery can lead to increased incidence of pulmonary complications, hemodynamic instability and potentially death, while delayed surgical stabilisation has its attendant problems of prolonged recumbency including deep vein thrombosis, organ-sp ecific infection and pressure sores.

METHODS

A narrative review focussed at the epidemiology, demographics and principles of surgery for spinal trauma in poly-traumatised patients was performed. Pubmed search (1995-2020) based on the keywords - polytrauma OR multiple trauma AND spine fracture AND timing, present in "All the fields" of the search tab, was performed. Among 48 articles retrieved, 23 articles specific to the management of spinal fracture in polytrauma patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Spine trauma is noted in up to 30% of polytrauma patients. Unstable spinal fractures with or without spinal cord injury in polytrauma require surgical intervention and are treated based on the following principles - stabilizing the injured spine during resuscitation, acute management of life-and limb-threatening organ injuries, "damage control" internal stabilisation of unstable spinal injuries during the early acute phase and, definitive surgery at an appropriate window of opportunity. Early spine fracture fixation, especially in the setting of chest injury, reduces morbidity of pulmonary complications and duration of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Recognition and stabilisation of spinal fractures during resuscitation of polytrauma is important. Early posterior spinal fixation of unstable fractures, described as damage control spine surgery, is preferred while a delayed definitive 360° decompression is performed once the systemic milieu is optimal, if mandated for biomechanical and neurological indications.

Early Spinal Injury Stabilization in Multiple-Injured Patients: Do All Patients Benefit?

Background: Thoracolumbar spine fractures in multiple-injured patients are a common injury pattern. The appropriate timing for the surgical stabilization of vertebral fractures is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of the timing of spinal surgery in multiple-injured patients both in general and in respect to spinal injury severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of multiple-injured patients with an associated spinal trauma within the thoracic or lumbar spine (injury severity score (ISS) >16, age >16 years) was performed from January 2012 to December 2016 in two Level I trauma centres. Demographic data, circumstances of the accident, and ISS, as well as time to spinal surgery were documented. The evaluated outcome parameters were length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) (iLOS) and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, duration of mechanical ventilation, onset of sepsis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), as well as mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: A total of 113 multiple-injured patients with spinal stabilization and a complete dataset were included in the study. Of these, 71 multiple-injured patients (63%) presented with an AOSpine A-type spinal injury, whereas 42 (37%) had an AOSpine B-/C-type spinal injury. Forty-nine multiple-injured patients (43.4%) were surgically treated for their spinal injury within 24 h after trauma, and showed a significantly reduced length of stay in the ICU (7.31 vs. 14.56 days; p < 0.001) and hospital stay (23.85 vs. 33.95 days; p = 0.048), as well as a significantly reduced prevalence of sepsis compared to those surgically treated later than 24 h (3 vs. 7; p = 0.023). These adverse effects were even more pronounced in the case where cutoffs were increased to either 72 h or 96 h. Independent risk factors for a delay in spinal surgery were a higher ISS (p = 0.036), a thoracic spine injury (p = 0.001), an AOSpine A-type spinal injury (p = 0.048), and an intact neurological status (p < 0.001). In multiple-injured patients with AOSpine A-type spinal injuries, an increased time to spinal surgery was only an independent risk factor for an increased LOS; however, in multiple-injured patients with B-/C-type spinal injuries, an increased time to spinal surgery was an independent risk factor for increased iLOS, LOS, and the development of sepsis. Conclusion: Our data support the concept of early spinal stabilization in multiple-injured patients with AOSpine B-/C-type injuries, especially of the thoracic spine. However, in multiple-injured patients with AOSpine A-type injuries, the beneficial impact of early spinal stabilization has been overemphasized in former studies, and the benefit should be weighed out against the risk of patients’ deterioration during early spinal stabilization.

Fracture fixation in the polytrauma patient: Markers that matter

Timing and type of fracture fixation in the multiply-injured trauma patient have been important and controversial topics. Ideal care for these patients come from providers who communicate well with one another in a team fashion and view the whole person, rather than focusing on injury to individual systems. This group encompasses a wide range of musculoskeletal and other injuries, further complicated by the broad spectrum of patients, with variability in age, medical and social comorbidities, all of which may have profound impact upon outcomes. The concept of Early Total Care arose from the realization that early definitive fixation of femur fractures provided pulmonary and systemic benefits to most patients. However, insufficient assessment and understanding of the physiological status of polytraumatized patients at the time of major orthopaedic procedures, potentially with inclusion of multiple other procedures in the same setting resulted in more morbidity, swinging the pendulum of care toward initial Damage Control Orthopaedics to minimize surgical insult. More recently, iterative assessment of response to resuscitation using Early Appropriate Care guidelines, suggests definitive fixation of most axial and femoral injuries within 36 h after injury appears safe in resuscitated patients, as measured by improvement of acidosis.

Comparison of percutaneous minimally invasive versus open posterior spine surgery for fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: A retrospective matched cohort analysis

Introduction

Percutaneous minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is a treatment option for thoracolumbar fractures and we aim to evaluate its outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective matched cohort study of all patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated with MISS or open posterior approach.

Results

We included 100 MISS and 155 open patients. After controlling for patient characteristics, our results statistically favor MISS in mean operative time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and number of patients requiring postoperative blood transfusions within 48 h.

Conclusions

Advantages of using MISS for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures are decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and fewer patients requiring transfusions.

Multiple Procedures in the Initial Surgical Setting: When Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks in Patients With Multiple System Trauma?

OBJECTIVES

To compare single versus multiple procedures in the same surgical setting. We hypothesized that complication rates would not be different and length of stay would be shorter in patients undergoing multiple procedures.

DESIGN

Prospective, cohort.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 370 patients with high-energy fractures were treated after a standard protocol for resuscitation to lactate <4.0 mmol/L, pH ≥7.25, or base excess (BE) ≥-5.5 mmol/L. Fractures included femur (n = 167), pelvis (n = 74), acetabulum (n = 54), and spine (n = 107).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complications, including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, infections, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Definitive fixation was performed concurrently with another procedure in 147 patients. They had greater ISS (29.4 vs. 24.6, P < 0.01), more transfusions (8.9 U vs. 3.6 U, P < 0.01), and longer surgery (4:22 vs. 2:41, P < 0.01) than patients with fracture fixation only, but no differences in complications. When patients who had definitive fixation in the same setting as another procedure were compared only with other patients who required more than 1 procedure performed in a staged manner on different days (n = 71), complications were fewer (33% vs. 54%, P = 0.004), and ventilation time (4.00 vs. 6.83 days), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (6.38 vs. 10.6 days), and length of stay (12.4 vs. 16.0 days) were shorter (all P ≤ 0.03) for the nonstaged patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In resuscitated patients, definitive fixation in the same setting as another procedure did not increase the frequency of complications despite greater ISS, transfusions, and surgical duration in the multiple procedure group. Multiple procedures in the same setting may reduce complications and hospital stay versus additional surgeries on other days.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early Appropriate Care: A Protocol to Standardize Resuscitation Assessment and to Expedite Fracture Care Reduces Hospital Stay and Enhances Revenue

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that a standardized protocol for fracture care would enhance revenue by reducing complications and length of stay.

DESIGN

Prospective consecutive series.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundread and fifty-three adult patients with a mean age of 40.7 years and mean Injury Severity Score of 26.0.

INTERVENTION

Femur, pelvis, or spine fractures treated surgically.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Hospital and professional charges and collections were analyzed. Fixation was defined as early (<36 hours) or delayed. Complications and hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean charges were US $180,145 with a mean of US $66,871 collected (37%). The revenue multiplier was US $59,882/$6989 (8.57), indicating hospital collection of US $8.57 for every professional dollar, less than half of which went to orthopaedic surgeons. Delayed fracture care was associated with more intensive care unit (4.5 vs. 9.4) and total hospital days (9.4 vs. 15.3), with mean loss of actual revenue US $6380/patient delayed (n = 47), because of the costs of longer length of stay. Complications were associated with the highest expenses: mean of US $291,846 charges and US $101,005 collections, with facility collections decreased by 5.1%. An uncomplicated course of care was associated with the most favorable total collections: (US $60,017/$158,454 = 38%) and the shortest mean stay (8.7 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Facility collections were nearly 9 times more than professional collections. Delayed fixation was associated with more complications, and facility collections decreased 5% with a complication. Furthermore, delayed fixation was associated with longer hospital stay, accounting for US $300K more in actual costs during the study. A standardized protocol to expedite definitive fixation enhances the profitability of the trauma service line.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predicting Occurrence of Spine Surgery Complications Using "Big Data" Modeling of an Administrative Claims Database

BACKGROUND

Postoperative metrics are increasingly important in determining standards of quality for physicians and hospitals. Although complications following spinal surgery have been described, procedural and patient variables have yet to be incorporated into a predictive model of adverse-event occurrence. We sought to develop a predictive model of complication occurrence after spine surgery.

METHODS

We used longitudinal prospective data from a national claims database and developed a predictive model incorporating complication type and frequency of occurrence following spine surgery procedures. We structured our model to assess the impact of features such as preoperative diagnosis, patient comorbidities, location in the spine, anterior versus posterior approach, whether fusion had been performed, whether instrumentation had been used, number of levels, and use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). We assessed a variety of adverse events. Prediction models were built using logistic regression with additive main effects and logistic regression with main effects as well as all 2 and 3-factor interactions. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization was used to select features. Competing approaches included boosted additive trees and the classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. The final prediction performance was evaluated by estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as predictions were applied to independent validation data and compared with the Charlson comorbidity score.

RESULTS

The model was developed from 279,135 records of patients with a minimum duration of follow-up of 30 days. Preliminary assessment showed an adverse-event rate of 13.95%, well within norms reported in the literature. We used the first 80% of the records for training (to predict adverse events) and the remaining 20% of the records for validation. There was remarkable similarity among methods, with an AUC of 0.70 for predicting the occurrence of adverse events. The AUC using the Charlson comorbidity score was 0.61. The described model was more accurate than Charlson scoring (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We present a modeling effort based on administrative claims data that predicts the occurrence of complications after spine surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We believe that the development of a predictive modeling tool illustrating the risk of complication occurrence after spine surgery will aid in patient counseling and improve the accuracy of risk modeling strategies.

Teamwork in Trauma: System Adjustment to a Protocol for the Management of Multiply Injured Patients

OBJECTIVES

We developed a protocol to determine the timing of definitive fracture care based on the adequacy of resuscitation. Inception of this project required a multidisciplinary group, including physicians from anesthesiology, general trauma and critical care, neurosurgery, orthopaedic spine, and orthopaedic trauma. The purposes of this study were to review our initial experience with adherence to protocol recommendations and to assess barriers to implementation.

DESIGN

Prospective.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

INTERVENTION

Definitive fixation of pelvis, acetabulum, spine, and femur fractures within 36 hours of injury, based on laboratory parameters for acidosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Three hundred five consecutive skeletally mature patients with Injury Severity Score ≥ 16 (mean, 26.4) and 346 fractures of the proximal or diaphyseal femur (n = 152), pelvic ring (n = 56), acetabulum (n = 44), and/or spine (n = 94) were treated surgically. Adherence to the protocol was defined as definitive fixation within 36 hours of injury in resuscitated patients. All patients were adequately resuscitated within that time. Patient demographic and injury characteristics, date and time of presentation, and reasons for delay were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-one patients (82%) with 287 fractures were treated according to the protocol, whereas 54 patients (18%) with 59 fractures were definitively stabilized on a delayed basis (mean, 90 hours). Delay was not related to patient age, Injury Severity Score, day of week, or time of presentation. Before implementation of this protocol, 76% were treated on a delayed basis, demonstrating improvement for each fracture type: spine (79% of previous patients with delay), pelvis (57%), acetabulum (72%), and femur (22%); all P < 0.0001 for more frequently delayed surgery before the protocol. Surgeon choice to delay the procedure accounted for 67% of reasons for delay. Other reasons included intensivist choice (13%), operating room availability (7.4%), patient choice (3.7%), severe head injury (5.6%), or cardiac issues (3.7%). Our trauma center and surgeons became more accustomed to the protocol and had fewer delays over time; 10% were delayed 2 years after implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of trauma patients with injury to multiple systems requires teamwork among providers from related specialties and hospital support, in terms of operating room access, with appropriate ancillary personnel and equipment. Our system adjusted quickly to the protocol. Surgeon preference was the most common reason for delayed fixation, but within 24 months, only 10% of fractures were treated on a delayed basis, as long as patients were resuscitated.

Reasons for transfer to a level 1 trauma center and barriers to timely definitive fracture fixation

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare patients transferred from another hospital to our trauma center with those arriving directly, to identify barriers to care for similar fractures. We hypothesized that the most frequent reason for delayed definitive fixation would be interhospital transfer and that patients would be transferred primarily for 2 reasons: complex patients with more severe injuries and less complex patients without insurance.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1549 skeletally mature patients with 1655 fractures: 379 acetabulum, 301 pelvic ring, 876 femur, and 99 spine.

INTERVENTION

All patients were treated surgically, with early fixation defined as <24 hours after injury.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographic and injury characteristics were recorded. Reasons for and timing of transfer were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 814 patients (53%) were transferred from another hospital, including 66% of acetabular and 62% of pelvic ring fractures. Transferred patients were older (39.1 vs. 36.6 years, P = 0.002), had more commercial insurance (21% vs. 17%, P = 0.10), and were less often uninsured (27% vs. 31%, P = 0.11). However, the mean Injury Severity Score of uninsured transferred patients was lower than that of the other transferred patients (22.9 vs. 25.8, P < 0.0001). Transfer was not related to weekday or time of injury. A total of 973 patients (63%) had early definitive fixation. Delayed fixation was often for surgeon preference (57%). Transferred patients were more likely to have delayed fixation (43% vs. 31% of nontransferred, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Internal barriers to definitive fracture care were noted, the most frequent of which is surgeon preference. Treatment delays due to transfer accounted for 12% of all delays. Many transferred patients appeared appropriate based on injury complexity. However, over one-fourth of those transferred had low Injury Severity Score and a significantly higher incidence of no insurance. Communication and transparency about these issues may serve to expedite care and to enhance financial stability of larger trauma centers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level II.

Early or delayed stabilization in severely injured patients with spinal fractures? Current surgical objectivity according to the Trauma Registry of DGU: treatment of spine injuries in polytrauma patients

BACKGROUND

Because of a lack of evidence, the appropriate timing of surgical stabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in severely injured patients is still controversial. Data of a large international trauma register were analyzed to investigate the medical care situation of unstable spinal column fractures in patients with multiple injuries, so as to examine the outcome related to timing of surgical stabilization.

METHODS

Data sets of the Trauma Registry of German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie [DGU]) (1993-2010) were analyzed. The Trauma Registry of DGU is a prospective, multicenter register that provides information on severely injured patients. All patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or greater caused by blunt trauma, subsequent treatment of 7 days or more, 16 years or older, and thoracic or lumbar spine injuries (spine Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 2) were included in our analysis. Patients with relevant spine injuries classified as having a spine AIS score of 3 or greater were further analyzed in terms of whether they got early (<72 hours) or late (>72 hours) surgical treatment due to unstable spinal column fractures.

RESULTS

Of 24,974 patients, 8,994 (36.0%) had documented spinal injuries (spine AIS score ≥ 2). A total of 1,309 patients who sustained relevant thoracic spine injuries (spine AIS score ≥ 3) and 994 patients who experienced lumbar spine trauma and classified as having spine AIS score of 3 or greater were more precisely analyzed. Of these, 68.2% and 71.0%, respectively, received an early thoracic or lumbar spine fixation. With an increase in spinal injury severity, an increase in early stabilization in the thoracic and lumbar spine was seen. In the group of patients with early surgical stabilization, significantly shorter hospital stays, shorter intensive care unit stays, fewer days on mechanical ventilation, and lower rates of sepsis were seen. In the case that additional body regions were affected, for example, when patients were critically ill, a delayed spinal stabilization was more often performed.

CONCLUSION

A spinal stabilization at an early stage (<72 hours) is presumed to be beneficial. Although some patients may require delay due to necessary medical improvement, every reasonable effort should be made to treat patients with instable spinal column fractures as soon as possible. If an early surgical treatment is feasible, severely injured patients may benefit from a shorter period of hospital treatment and a lower rate of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level III.

Timing of orthopaedic surgery in multiple trauma patients: development of a protocol for early appropriate care

OBJECTIVES

The purpose was to define which clinical conditions warrant delay of definitive fixation for pelvis, femur, acetabulum, and spine fractures. A model was developed to predict the complications.

DESIGN

Statistical modeling based on retrospective database.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

A total of 1443 adults with pelvis (n = 291), acetabulum (n = 399), spine (n = 102), and/or proximal or diaphyseal femur (n = 851) fractures.

INTERVENTION

All fractures were treated surgically.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance assessed associations of parameters with complications. Logistic predictive models were developed with the incorporation of multiple fixed and random effect covariates. Odds ratios, F tests, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated.

RESULTS

Twelve percent had pulmonary complications, with 8.2% overall developing pneumonia. The pH and base excess values were lower (P < 0.0001) and the rate of improvement was also slower (all Ps < 0.007), with pneumonia or any pulmonary complication. Similarly, lactate values were greater with pulmonary complications (all Ps < 0.02), and lactate was the most specific predictor of complications. Chest injury was the strongest independent predictor of pulmonary complication. Initial lactate was a stronger predictor of pneumonia (P = 0.0006) than initial pH (P = 0.047) or the rate of improvement of pH over the first 8 hours (P = 0.0007). An uncomplicated course was associated with the absence of chest injury (P < 0.0001) and definitive fixation within 24 (P = 0.007) or 48 hours (P = 0.005). Models were developed to predict probability of complications with various injury combinations using specific laboratory parameters measuring residual acidosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Acidosis on presentation is associated with complications. Correction of pH within 8 hours to >7.25 was associated with fewer pulmonary complications. Presence and severity of chest injury, number of fractures, and timing of fixation are other significant variables to include in a predictive model and algorithm development for Early Appropriate Care. The goal is to minimize complications by definitive management of major skeletal injury once the patient has been adequately resuscitated.

Complications in acute phase hospitalization of traumatic spinal cord injury: does surgical timing matter?

BACKGROUND

Optimal timing of surgery after a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most controversial subjects in spine surgery. We assessed the relationship between surgical timing and the occurrence of nonneurologic postoperative complications during acute hospital stay for patients with a traumatic SCI.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single institution. Four hundred thirty-one cases of traumatic SCI were reviewed, and postoperative complications were recorded from the medical charts. Patients were compared using two different surgical timing cutoffs (24 hours and 72 hours). Logistic regression analyses were modeled for complication occurrence. The effect of surgical timing on complication rate was adjusted for potential confounding variables such as the level of injury, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, Injury Severity Score (ISS), age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Surgical Invasiveness Index.

RESULTS

Patients operated on earlier were younger, had less comorbidity, had a higher ISS, and were more likely to have a cervical lesion and a complete injury (ASIA A). A reduction in the global rate of complications as well as in the rate of pneumonias and pressure ulcers were predicted by surgery performed earlier than 72 hours and 24 hours. Increasing age, more severe ASIA grade, and cervical lesion as well as increased Charlson Comorbidity Index, ISS, and SII were also statistically related to the occurrence of complications.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that a shorter surgical delay after a traumatic SCI decreases the rate of complications during the acute phase hospitalization. We suggest that patients with traumatic SCI should be promptly operated on earlier than 24 hours following the injury to reduce complications while optimizing neurologic recovery. If medical or practical reasons preclude timing less than 24 hours, efforts should still be made to perform surgery earlier than 72 hours following the SCI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level III; therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Do patients with multiple system injury benefit from early fixation of unstable axial fractures? The effects of timing of surgery on initial hospital course

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that early definitive management (within 24 hours of injury) of mechanically unstable fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, femur and spine would reduce complications and shorten length of stay.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

1005 skeletally mature patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥18 with pelvis (n = 259), acetabulum (n = 266), proximal or diaphyseal femur (n = 569), and/or thoracolumbar spine (n = 98) fractures. Chest (n = 447), abdomen (n = 328), and head (n = 155) injuries were present.

INTERVENTION

Definitive surgery was within 24 hours in 572 patients and after 24 hours in 433.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complications related to the initial trauma episode included infections, sepsis, pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), organ failure, and death.

RESULTS

Days in intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital stay were lower with early fixation (5.1 ± 8.8 vs. 8.4 ± 11.1 ICU days (P = 0.006); 10.5 ± 9.8 versus 14.3 ± 11.4 total days (P = 0.001), after adjusting for ISS and age. Fewer complications (24.0% vs. 35.8%, P = 0.040), ARDS (1.7% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.048), pneumonia (8.6% vs. 15.2%, P = 0.070), and sepsis (1.7% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.054) occurred with early versus delayed fixation. Logistic regression was used to account for differences in age and ISS between the early and delayed groups. Adjustment for severity of chest injury was included when analyzing pulmonary complications including pneumonia and ARDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive fracture management within 24 hours resulted in shorter ICU and hospital stays and fewer complications and ARDS, after adjusting for age and associated injury types and severity. Surgical timing must be determined with consideration of the physiology of the patient and complexity of surgery. Parameters should be established within which it is safe to proceed with fixation. These data will serve as a baseline for comparison with prospective evaluation of such parameters in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictors of complications after spinal stabilization of thoracolumbar spine injuries

BACKGROUND

The management of complications after major traumatic spinal injury and surgical stabilization is a challenge. The purpose of this study is to identify factors predictive of a complication after surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar spine injuries.

METHODS

A review of subjects prospectively enrolled in a multicenter database for spine trauma was performed. Standard demographic data, Glasgow Coma Scores, Injury Severity Score, American Spinal Injury Association score, Charlson Comorbiditiy Index (CCI), mechanism of injury, administration of methylprednisolone (National Acute Spinal Cord Injury II, III), time from injury to surgery, and surgical approach were evaluated. All perioperative complications within 6 months of surgery were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of the occurrence of a complication after surgical stabilization of a thoracolumbar injury.

RESULTS

There were 230 patients (57 women, 173 men), 35% were smokers. The mean age at injury was 41.8 ± 17.8 years. The majority of patients (52%) had no neurologic deficits. Nineteen percent had complete cord injuries whereas 29% had incomplete cord injuries. The mean admission ISS was 9.2 ± 7.8, mean CCI was 0.2 ± 0.7, mean Glasgow Coma Score was 14.6 ± 1.6. NASCIS II and III was instituted in 15.5% and 4.2% of all patients, respectively; mean time from injury to surgery was 8.9 ± 59 days. The incidence of complications was 79% (minor 30%, major 49%). No factors predictive of a minor complication were identified. Factors predictive of the occurrence of a major complication were administration of high-dose steroids, ASIA score, and CCI.

CONCLUSION

The severity of neurologic injury, number of comorbidities, and use of the high-dose steroids independently increase the risk of having a major complication after surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Early definitive stabilization of unstable pelvis and acetabulum fractures reduces morbidity

BACKGROUND

Although the benefits of acute stabilization of long bone fractures are recognized, the role of early fixation of unstable pelvis and acetabular fractures is not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to review complications and hospital course of patients treated surgically for pelvis and acetabulum fractures. We hypothesized that early definitive fixation would reduce morbidity and decrease length of stay.

METHODS

Six hundred forty-five patients were treated surgically at a level I trauma center for unstable fractures of the pelvic ring (n = 251), acetabulum (n = 359), or both (n = 40). Mean age was 40.5 years, and mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 25.6 (range 9-66). They were retrospectively reviewed to determine complications including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, multiple organ failure (MOF), infections, and reperations.

RESULTS

Definitive fixation was within 24 hours of injury in 233 patients (early, mean 13.4 hours) and >24 hours in 412 (late, mean 99.2 hours). Twenty-nine patients (12.4%) had complications after early fixation versus 81 (19.7%) after late, p = 0.006. Length of stay and intensive care unit days were 10.7 days versus 11.6 days (p = 0.26) and 8.1 days versus 9.9 days (p = 0.03) for early and late groups, respectively. With ISS >18 (n = 165 early [ISS 32.7]; n = 253 late [ISS 33.1]), early fixation resulted in fewer pulmonary complications (12.7% versus 25%, p = 0.0002), less ARDS (4.8% versus 12.6%, p = 0.019), and less MOF (1.8% versus 4.3%, p = 0.40). Rates of complications, pulmonary complications, deep vein thrombosis, and MOF were no different for patients with pelvis versus acetabulum fractures. In patients receiving ≥ 10U packed red blood cells (n = 41 early, n = 56 late) early fixation led to fewer pulmonary complications (24% versus 55%, p = 0.002), less ARDS (12% versus 25%, p = 0.09), and MOF (7.3% versus 14%, p = 0.23). Two hundred ten patients had some chest injury (32.6%). Chest injury with Abbreviated Injury Scores ≥ 3 was present in 46 (19.7%) of early and 78 (18.9%) of late patients (p = 0.44) and was associated with pulmonary complications in 26.1% versus 35.9%; ARDS in 15.2% versus 23.1%; and MOF in 6.5% versus 6.4%, respectively (all p > 0.20). However, chest injury with Abbreviated Injury Scores ≥ 3 was independently associated with more complications including ARDS (20.2% versus 3.3%, p < 0.0001), other pulmonary complications (32.3% versus 10.4%, p < 0.0001), and MOF (6.5% versus 1.2%, p = 0.0016), regardless of timing of fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Early fixation of unstable pelvis and acetabular fractures in multiply injured patients reduces morbidity and length of intensive care unit stay, which may decrease treatment costs. Further study to ascertain the effects of associated systemic injuries and the utility of physiologic and laboratory parameters during resuscitation may delineate recommendations for optimal surgical timing in specific patient groups.

The beneficial effects of early stabilization of thoracic spine fractures depend on trauma severity

BACKGROUND

The timing of stabilization for thoracic spine injuries is discussed controversial. Although early repair of long bone fractures is known to reduce complications, few studies investigate this issue in spine trauma.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 160 patients (January 2000 to March 2003) with spine fractures from Th1 to L1, which were stabilized. Patients were divided into two groups: early stabilization within 72 hours or later. Other subgroups were analyzed for the relationship of neurologic status, injury severity, and incidence of preoperative lung failure.

RESULTS

: Severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score >or=38 pts) with early stabilization had a significantly shorter intensive care unit-stay (14 days [1-34 days] vs. 20 days [1-39 days]; p < 0.05) and overall shorter hospital stay (56 days [9-147 days] vs. 108 days [11-198 days]; p < 0.05). Similar patterns were seen for patients with Frankel A deficits (Frankel Score) and preoperative lung failure. The clinical course of less severe-injured patients was not influenced at all.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide further evidence that early stabilization of spine injuries is safe. In severely injured patients, it does not impair perioperative lung function and results in a reduced overall intensive care unit and hospital stay.

Analysis of observational studies: a guide to understanding statistical methods

Observational studies provide an important source of information when randomized controlled trials cannot or should not be undertaken, provided that the data are analyzed and interpreted with special attention to bias. This article highlights the special analytic considerations required for proper reporting and interpretation of observational studies. We review statistical principles that are fundamental to understanding what observational data can offer. The concepts include the relationship between a study sample and the target population, and the two primary forms of statistical analysis: estimation and hypothesis testing. The concept of bias, and confounding in particular, is introduced as an obstacle to drawing valid conclusions from an observational study. The discussion will then focus on the techniques that are most useful in the analysis of the three most common types of observational studies (the case series, the therapeutic study, and the prognostic study). The goal of this review is to empower the reader to take a practical approach to and validly interpret the statistical analysis of these study types.

Learning how to resurface cam-type femoral heads with acceptable accuracy and precision: the role of computed tomography-based navigation

BACKGROUND

Resurfacing arthroplasty for cam-type deformities, which are a common cause of early osteoarthritis, is a technically demanding operation. Like any other arthroplasty, it requires both accuracy and precision. On the basis of the results of series reported by expert surgeons, we considered it desirable that this operation should be performed within +/-10 degrees of the desired angular orientation and +/-6 mm of entry-point translation in 95% of hips. Technological aids are now available to help surgeons achieve that level of accuracy. Three models of cam-type hips of increasing severity were used to assess the efficacy of three systems of instrumentation at delivering the required level of accuracy and precision.

METHODS

Thirty-two students of surgical technology were instructed in hip resurfacing and shown detailed plans of the desired operative outcome for the three hips with cam-type deformity. They then used conventional instruments, imageless navigation, and computed tomography-based navigation to perform the operation as accurately as possible.

RESULTS

Conventional instrumentation produced an unacceptably wide range of entry-point errors. Imageless navigation was able to deliver adequate accuracy and precision in varus-valgus angulation and superoinferior translation, but was less satisfactory in version and anteroposterior translation. Computed tomography-based navigation enabled novice surgeons to navigate hips that had difficult cam-type deformity with acceptable precision in all four degrees of freedom measured.

CONCLUSIONS

Only computed tomography-based navigation appears to be appropriate for delivering both the accuracy and the precision needed by surgeons on the steep part of their learning curve. Neither conventional neck-based instrumentation nor imageless navigation provided enough help for novice surgeons learning to perform this technically challenging operation.