Posterior Acromial Morphology Is Significantly Associated with Posterior Shoulder Instability

SECEC Didier Patte Prize 2023: the ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability

BACKGROUND

The ABC classification has recently been proposed as a comprehensive classification system for posterior shoulder instability (PSI). The purpose of this study was to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the ABC classification.

METHODS

All consecutive patients presenting with unidirectional PSI from June 2019 to June 2021 were included in a prospective study. No patients were excluded, leaving a consecutive series of 100 cases of PSI in 91 patients. All recorded clinical and imaging data were used to create anonymized clinical case vignettes, which were evaluated twice according to the ABC classification at the end of the recruitment period in random sequential order by 4 independent raters (2 experienced shoulder surgeons and 2 orthopedic residents) to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the ABC classification for PSI and to describe differences in characteristics among subtypes. Group A was defined as a first-time singular PSI event <3 months in the past regardless of etiology and is further subdivided into type 1 and type 2 depending on the occurrence of a subluxation (A1) or dislocation (A2). Group B comprises recurrent dynamic PSI regardless of time since onset and is further subdivided by the cause of instability into functional (B1) and structural (B2) dynamic PSI. Group C includes chronic static PSI with posterior humeral decentering that can be either constitutional (C1) or acquired (C2).

RESULTS

None of the cases was deemed unsuitable to be classified based on the proposed system by the observers. After consensus agreement between the 2 expert raters, 16 cases were attributed to group A (8 type A1 and 8 type A2); 64, to group B (33 type B1 and 31 type B2); and 20, to group C (11 type C1 and 9 type C2). The expert raters agreed on the classification subtypes in 99% and 96% of the cases during the first rating and second rating, respectively (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.998 and 0.99, respectively). The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both raters. The beginners reached the same conclusion as the consensus agreement in 94% of the cases (ICC, 0.99) and 89% of the cases (ICC, 0.97) during the first round and 94% each (ICC, 0.97) during the second round. The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both beginners. Overall, discrepancies between raters were found between groups B1 and B2 (n = 14), groups B2 and C2 (n = 4), groups B1 and C1 (n = 1), and groups A1 and B2 (n = 1). In general, each subtype showed distinctive clinical and imaging characteristics that facilitated the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The presented ABC classification for PSI is a comprehensive classification with a high reliability and reproducibility. However, a gradual transition and potential progression between the subtypes of PSI must be considered. The reliable distinction between different subtypes of PSI based on etiology and pathomechanism provides a standardized basis for future investigations on treatment recommendations.

Are glenoid retroversion, humeral subluxation, and Walch classification associated with a muscle imbalance?

BACKGROUND

The etiology of humeral posterior subluxation remains unknown, and it has been hypothesized that horizontal muscle imbalance could cause this condition. The objective of this study was to compare the ratio of anterior-to-posterior rotator cuff and deltoid muscle volume as a function of humeral subluxation and glenoid morphology when analyzed as a continuous variable in arthritic shoulders.

METHODS

In total, 333 computed tomography scans of shoulders (273 arthritic shoulders and 60 healthy controls) were included in this study and were segmented automatically. For each muscle, the volume of muscle fibers without intramuscular fat was measured. The ratio between the volume of the subscapularis and the volume of the infraspinatus plus teres minor (AP ratio) and the ratio between the anterior and posterior deltoids (APdeltoid) were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether a correlation could be found between these ratios and glenoid version, humeral subluxation, and/or glenoid type per the Walch classification.

RESULTS

Within the arthritic cohort, no statistically significant difference in the AP ratio was found between type A glenoids (1.09 ± 0.22) and type B glenoids (1.03 ± 0.16, P = .09), type D glenoids (1.12 ± 0.27, P = .77), or type C glenoids (1.10 ± 0.19, P > .999). No correlation was found between the AP ratio and glenoid version (ρ = -0.0360, P = .55) or humeral subluxation (ρ = 0.076, P = .21). The APdeltoid ratio of type A glenoids (0.48 ± 0.15) was significantly greater than that of type B glenoids (0.35 ± 0.16, P < .01) and type C glenoids (0.21 ± 0.10, P < .01) but was not significantly different from that of type D glenoids (0.64 ± 0.34, P > .999). When evaluating both healthy control and arthritic shoulders, moderate correlations were found between the APdeltoid ratio and both glenoid version (ρ = 0.55, P < .01) and humeral subluxation (ρ = -0.61, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This in vitro study supports the use of software for fully automated 3-dimensional reconstruction of the 4 rotator cuff muscles and the deltoid. Compared with previous 2-dimensional computed tomography scan studies, our study did not find any correlation between the anteroposterior muscle volume ratio and glenoid parameters in arthritic shoulders. However, once deformity occurred, the observed APdeltoid ratio was lower with type B and C glenoids. These findings suggest that rotator cuff muscle imbalance may not be the precipitating etiology for the posterior humeral subluxation and secondary posterior glenoid erosion characteristic of Walch type B glenoids.

Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fast Field Echo Resembling a Computed Tomography Using Restricted Echo-Spacing Sequence Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Quantifying Bone Loss and Measuring Shoulder Morphology in Patients With Shoulder Dislocation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the equivalence of 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (FRACTURE [Fast field echo Resembling A CT Using Restricted Echo-spacing]) and 3D computed tomography (CT) in quantifying bone loss in patients with shoulder dislocation and measuring morphologic parameters of the shoulder.

METHODS

From July 2022 to June 2023, patients with anterior shoulder dislocation who were aged 18 years or older and underwent both MRI and CT within 1 week were included in the study. The MRI protocol included an additional FRACTURE sequence. Three-dimensional reconstructions of MRI (FRACTURE) and CT were completed by 2 independent observers using Mimics software (version 21.0) through simple threshold-based segmentation. For bone defect cases, 2 independent observers evaluated glenoid defect, percentage of glenoid defect, glenoid track, Hill-Sachs interval, and on-track/off-track. For all cases, glenoid width, glenoid height, humeral head-fitting sphere radius, critical shoulder angle, glenoid version, vault depth, and post-processing time were assessed. The paired t test was used to assess the differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI (FRACTURE). Bland-Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the consistency between 3D CT and 3D MRI (FRACTURE). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was evaluated with the interclass correlation coefficient. The paired χ2 test and Cohen κ statistic were used for binary variables (on-track/off-track).

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (16 with bipolar bone defect, 5 with only Hill-Sachs lesion, and 35 without bone defect) were ultimately enrolled in the study. The measurements of 21 bone defect cases showed no statistically significant differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI: glenoid defect, 4.05 ± 1.44 mm with 3D CT versus 4.16 ± 1.39 mm with 3D MRI (P = .208); percentage of glenoid defect, 16.21% ± 5.95% versus 16.61% ± 5.66% (P = .199); glenoid track, 18.02 ± 2.97 mm versus 18.08 ± 2.98 mm (P = .659); and Hill-Sachs interval, 14.29 ± 1.93 mm versus 14.35 ± 2.07 mm (P = .668). No significant difference was found between 3D CT and 3D MRI in the diagnosis of on-track/off-track (P > .999), and diagnostic agreement was perfect (κ = 1.00, P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 examination methods in the measurements of all 56 cases, except that the post-processing time of 3D MRI was significantly longer than that of 3D CT: glenoid height, 34.56 ± 1.98 mm with 3D CT versus 34.67 ± 2.01 mm with 3D MRI (P = .139); glenoid width, 25.32 ± 1.48 mm versus 25.45 ± 1.47 mm (P = .113); humeral head-fitting sphere radius, 22.91 ± 1.70 mm versus 23.00 ± 1.76 mm (P = .211); critical shoulder angle, 33.49° ± 2.55° versus 33.57° ± 2.51° (P = .328); glenoid version, -3.25° ± 2.57° versus -3.18° ± 2.57° (P = .322); vault depth, 37.43 ± 1.68 mm versus 37.58 ± 1.75 mm (P = .164); and post-processing time, 89.66 ± 10.20 seconds versus 360.93 ± 26.76 seconds (P < .001). For all assessments, the Bland-Altman plots showed excellent consistency between the 2 examination methods, and the interclass correlation coefficients revealed excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional MRI (FRACTURE) is equivalent to 3D CT in quantifying bone loss in patients with shoulder dislocation and measuring shoulder morphologic parameters.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, development of diagnostic criteria (consecutive patients with consistently applied reference standard and blinding).

Differences in Osseous Shoulder Morphology, Scapulothoracic Orientation, and Muscle Volume in Patients With Constitutional Static Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type C1) Compared With Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND

Constitutional static posterior humeral decentering (type C1 according to ABC Classification) has been recognized as a pre-osteoarthritic deformity that may lead to early-onset posterior decentering osteoarthritis at a young age. Therefore, it is important to identify possible associations of this pathologic shoulder condition to find more effective treatment options.

PURPOSE

To perform a comprehensive analysis of all parameters reported to be associated with a C1 shoulder-including the osseous shoulder morphology, scapulothoracic orientation, and the muscle volume of the shoulder girdle in a single patient cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective, comparative study was conducted analyzing 17 C1 shoulders in 10 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the complete depiction of the trunk from the base of the skull to the iliac crest, including both humeri. The mean age of the patients was 33.5 years, and all patients were men. To measure and compare the osseous shoulder morphology (glenoid version, glenoid offset, humeral torsion, anterior acromial coverage, posterior acromial coverage, posterior acromial height, and posterior acromial tilt) and scapulothoracic orientation (scapular protraction, scapular internal rotation, scapular upward rotation, scapular translation, scapular tilt, and thoracic kyphosis), these patients were matched 1 to 4 according their age, sex, and affected side with shoulder-healthy patients who had received positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography. To measure and compare the muscle volume of the shoulder girdle (subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, supraspinatus, trapezius, deltoid, latissimus dorsi/teres major, pectoralis major, and pectoralis minor), patients were matched 1 to 2 with patients who had received PET-MRI. Patients with visible pathologies of the upper extremities were excluded.

RESULTS

The C1 group had a significantly higher glenoid retroversion, increased anterior glenoid offset, reduced humeral retrotorsion, increased anterior acromial coverage, reduced posterior acromial coverage, increased posterior acromial height, and increased posterior acromial tilt compared with controls (P < .05). Decreased humeral retrotorsion showed significant correlation with higher glenoid retroversion (r = -0.742; P < .001) and higher anterior glenoid offset (r = -0.757; P < .001). Significant differences were found regarding less scapular upward rotation, less scapular tilt, and less thoracic kyphosis in the C1 group (P < .05). The muscle volume of the trapezius and deltoid was significantly higher in the C1 group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with C1 shoulders differ from healthy controls regarding osseous scapular and humeral morphology, scapulothoracic orientation, and shoulder girdle muscle distribution. These differences may be crucial in understanding the delicate balance of glenohumeral centering.

Management of Bone Loss in Posterior Glenohumeral Shoulder Instability: Current Concepts

» Posterior glenohumeral instability is relatively uncommon compared with anterior instability, but is becoming an increasingly recognized and surgically managed shoulder pathology.» Soft-tissue stabilization alone may not be sufficient in patients who present with substantial bone loss to the posterior glenoid and/or the anterior humeral head.» For posterior glenoid defects, posterior glenoid osteoarticular augmentation can be used, and posterior glenoid opening wedge osteotomy can be considered in cases of posterior instability with pathologic retroversion.» For humeral head lesions, several surgical treatment options are available including subscapularis transposition into the humeral head defect, autograft or allograft reconstruction, humeral rotation osteotomy, and shoulder arthroplasty.

Current Evidence Regarding Shoulder Instability in the Paediatric and Adolescent Population

Paediatric and adolescent shoulder instability is caused by a unique combination of traumatic factors, ligamentous laxity, and pattern of muscle contractility. The multifactorial nature of its aetiology makes interpretation of the literature difficult as nomenclature is also highly variable. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing literature and shed light on the nuances of paediatric and adolescent shoulder instability. The epidemiology, clinical features, imaging, and management of all forms of paediatric shoulder instability are presented. The main findings of this review are that structural abnormalities following a dislocation are uncommon in pre-pubertal paediatric patients. Young post-pubertal adolescents are at the highest risk of failure of non-operative management in the setting of traumatic instability with structural abnormality, and early stabilisation should be considered for these patients. Remplissage and the Latarjet procedure are safe treatment options for adolescents at high risk of recurrence, but the side-effect profile should be carefully considered. Patients who suffer from instability due to generalized ligamentous laxity benefit from a structured, long-term physiotherapy regimen, with surgery in the form of arthroscopic plication as a viable last resort. Those who suffer from a predominantly muscle patterning pathology do not benefit from surgery and require focus on regaining neuromuscular control.

A Posterior Acromial Bone Block Augmentation Is Biomechanically Effective at Restoring the Force Required To Translate the Humeral Head Posteriorly in a Cadaveric, Posterior Glenohumeral Instability Model

PURPOSE

To assess the biomechanical utility of a posterior acromial bone block (PABB) for the treatment of posterior glenohumeral instability.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were obtained based upon an a priori power analysis. A 2.5-cm scapular spine autograft was harvested from all shoulders. A custom robot device was used to apply a 50-N compressive force to the glenohumeral joint. The humeral head was translated 10 mm posteroinferiorly at 30 degrees from the center of the glenoid at a rate of 1.0 mm/s in 6 consecutive conditions: (1) intact specimen, (2) intact with PABB, (3) posterior capsulolabral tear, (4) addition of the PABB, (5) removal of the PABB and repair of the capsulolabral tear (LR), and (6) addition of the PABB with LR. The maximum force required to obtain this translation was recorded. Paired t tests were performed to compare relevant testing conditions.

RESULTS

Ten cadavers with a mean ± SD age of 54.4 ± 13.1 years and mean ± SD glenoid retroversion of 6.5 ± 1.0 degrees were studied. The PABB provided greater resistance force to humeral head translation compared to the instability state (instability, 29.3 ± 15.3 N vs PABB, 47.6 ± 21.0 N; P = .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], -27.6 to -10.0). When comparing PABB to LR, the PABB produced higher resistance force than LR alone (PABB, 47.6 ± 21.0 N; LR, 34.2 ± 20.5 N; P = .012; 95% CI, -23.4 to -4.1). An instability lesion treated with the PABB, with LR (P = .056; 95% CI, -0.30 to 20.4) or without LR (P = .351; 95% CI, -6.8 to 15.7), produced resistance forces similar to the intact specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

A PABB is biomechanically effective at restoring the force required to translate the humeral head posteriorly in a cadaveric, posterior glenohumeral instability model. A posterior acromial bone block is a biomechanically feasible option to consider in patients with recurrent posterior instability.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Augmentation of the posterior acromion may be a biomechanically feasible option to treat posterior shoulder instability.

Rotator Cuff Tears to Shoulder Instability: The Relationship Between Acromial Morphology and Shoulder Pathology

» The acromion is a well-studied region of the scapula that has demonstrated substantial relationships to various shoulder pathologies.» Abnormal acromial morphology is associated with rotator cuff pathology, and our understanding of this risk factor inspired acromioplasty as an adjunctive treatment for rotator cuff tears.» The acromion is linked closely to shoulder kinematics and biomechanics, as it serves as the origin for the deltoid muscle.» In degenerative shoulder disease, eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been associated with a higher, flatter acromial roof.» Increasing literature is emerging connecting morphology of the acromion with shoulder instability.

Comparison of Glenohumeral Bone Morphology Between Patients With Versus Without Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background

The stability of the glenohumeral joint is associated with anatomic characteristics including bony structures and soft tissues.

Purpose

To compare the differences in specific bony glenohumeral geometries between shoulders with anterior shoulder instability (ASI), unaffected contralateral shoulders, and healthy control shoulders.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans of 36 patients with ASI and 36 matched healthy controls were retrieved and 3-dimensionally reconstructed. We measured the glenoid radius of curvature (GROC) in the anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior directions, humeral head radius of curvature (HROC) in the AP direction, conformity index, glenoid height, glenoid width, glenoid index, stability angle, glenoid version, and glenoid depth. The differences between the groups were statistically calculated. CT scans of the unaffected contralateral shoulders from 21 of the ASI patients were also collected to identify the consistency of the bony structures in bilateral shoulders.

Results

Patients with ASI had greater GROC in the AP direction (P < .001), HROC in the AP direction (P = .002), glenoid height (P = .005), and glenoid index (P < .001) and smaller conformity index (P < .001), glenoid width (P = .002), stability angle (P < .001), and glenoid depth (P < .001). In addition, the glenoid of the ASI patients was more anteverted compared with that of controls (P = .001). There was no statistical difference in half the measurements between the bilateral shoulder joints in patients with ASI.

Conclusion

In this study, glenohumeral geometric differences were found between ASI patients and healthy control participants. Glenoid curvature and conformity index, based on bilateral comparisons of affected and contralateral shoulders, appear inherent and may predict ASI risk.

Correlation of Acromial Morphology With Risk and Direction of Shoulder Instability: An MRI Study

BACKGROUND

The influence of bony morphology on the development of posterior shoulder instability is not well known.

PURPOSE

To determine if acromial morphology, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with posterior or anterior shoulder instability.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

MRI measurements of posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), posterior acromial tilt (PAT), and anterior acromial coverage (AAC) were completed for 3 separate matched groups who underwent surgical intervention: posterior instability, anterior instability, and a comparison group of patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for snapping scapula. Inclusion criteria were patients with recurrent instability <40 years of age without multidirectional instability, glenoid bone loss >13.5%, or glenoid retroversion >10%.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 patients were included in each group. PAC was significantly less in the posterior instability group than in the anterior instability and comparison groups (68.3° vs 88.7° vs 81.7°; P < .001). PAH was significantly greater in the posterior group than in the anterior instability group (11.0 mm vs -0.1 mm; P < .001) and comparison group (0.7 mm; P < .001). There was no difference between the posterior and anterior groups in terms of PAT or AAC (P = .45 and P = .05, respectively). PAT was significantly smaller in the posterior instability group than the comparison group (55.2° vs 62.2°; P = .026). The anterior and comparison groups were not significantly different in PAH or PAT (P = .874 and P = .067, respectively) but were significantly different in AAC (P = .026).

CONCLUSION

A higher and flatter posterior acromion, as measured on preoperative MRI, appears to be associated with patients who require arthroscopic capsulolabral repair due to posterior shoulder instability. This information may help clinicians to both diagnose and predict the need for operative intervention for patients with posterior labral tears.

Acromion morphology is associated with glenoid bone loss in posterior glenohumeral instability

BACKGROUND

The acromion morphology in a shoulder with posterior instability differs from that of a shoulder without glenohumeral instability. Specifically, the acromion with a flatter sagittal tilt, greater posterior acromial height, and less posterior coverage is associated with posterior instability. However, the association between acromion morphology and glenoid bone loss (GBL) in the setting of posterior glenohumeral instability has not previously been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether acromial morphology influences the extent or pattern of posterior GBL in a cohort of patients with posterior glenohumeral instability.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study identified 89 shoulders with unidirectional posterior glenohumeral instability. Total area GBL was measured using the best-fit circle method on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Shoulders were divided into 3 groups: (1) no GBL (n = 30), (2) GBL 0%-13.5% (n = 45), or (3) GBL ≥13.5% (n = 14). Acromion measurements were performed on MRI and included acromial tilt, posterior acromial height, anterior acromial coverage, and posterior acromial coverage.

RESULTS

Patients without GBL had a steeper acromial tilt (58.5° ± 1.4°) compared with those with 0%-13.5% GBL (64.3° ± 1.5°) or GBL ≥13.5% (67.7° ± 1.8°) (P = .004). Patients without GBL also had greater posterior coverage (65.4° ± 1.7°) compared with those with GBL (60.3° ± 1.4°) (P = .015). Posterior acromion height was not significantly different among groups.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that an acromion with a flatter sagittal tilt and less posterior coverage is associated with GBL in the setting of posterior glenohumeral instability. This is important to consider as posterior GBL has been identified as a risk factor for failure of posterior soft tissue-stabilizing procedures.

The influence of posterior acromial morphology on outcomes and return to pushups in young patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair

Background

Prior evidence has identified specific posterior acromial morphology as significantly associated with unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of posterior acromial morphology on the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair (APCLR) for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. Additionally, we sought to determine the influence of posterior acromial morphology on the rate and time to return to pushups following APCLR.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. The study included consecutive patients undergoing APCLR. Data collected included demographics, radiographic measurements including posterior acromial height (PAH) and posterior acromial tilt on preoperative scapular-Y radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures at the preoperative and postoperative visits. In addition, starting at 6 months postoperative, patients were asked if they could perform pushups defined as at least 10 repetitions. At the final follow-up, we collected the number of pushups patients were able to perform.

Results

Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent APCLR with a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 12-41). Significant improvement from preoperative to 2 years postoperative was demonstrated in Subjective Shoulder Value (50-85), VAS (6-2.5), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (48 to 83), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) (1437-777), P = .001. The recurrent instability rate was 3/32 (9%). Patients with PAH > 23 (N = 17) had a recurrent instability rate of 18% (3/17) versus PAH ≤ 23 (N = 15) 0% (0/15), worse WOSI scores (P = .41), and a lower number of pushups (P = .48). The percentage of patients reporting the ability to perform pushups was (6 months/1 year/2 years) (50%/78%/95%). The mean number of pushups reported at the final follow-up was 33 (range, 1-60).

Discussion

Following APCLR, approximately 50% of patients resume pushups at 6 months postoperatively, and 80% return at 1 year. Patients reported performing a mean of 33 pushups following APCLR at the final follow-up. Patients with a PAH greater than 23 on preoperative scapular-Y radiographs had a higher rate of recurrent posterior instability, worse WOSI scores, and lower return to pushups; however, the results did not meet statistical significance. Therefore, future larger studies are needed to determine if posterior acromial morphology is independently associated with worse outcomes and increased recurrent instability rates following APCLR.

Effect of Anterior Acromial Coverage on Functional and Radiological Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair of Anteroposterior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tear size, fatty infiltration, and scapular morphology are correlated with tendon healing and functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair; however, the association between anteroposterior acromial coverage and the clinical outcomes of anteroposterior massive rotator cuff tears (AP-MRCTs; involving all 3 tendons) remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To identify the association between AP acromial coverage and functional and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs between January 2015 and December 2020 were included in the study and classified according to whether anterior acromial coverage (AAC) was anterior (46 patients; positive AAC group) or posterior (52 patients; negative AAC group) to the scapular line on true lateral shoulder radiographs. Demographic characteristics, surgical details, and functional outcomes were prospectively collected. Acromial morphological features, global tear extension (GTE), the global fatty infiltration index (GFII), tendon integrity after repair, proximal humeral migration, and glenohumeral abduction were measured and calculated on radiographs or magnetic resonance imaging scans preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors of a rotator cuff retear.

RESULTS

The positive AAC group showed larger AAC, posterior acromial tilt, and anterior acromial slope as well as smaller posterior acromial coverage compared with the negative AAC group. Postoperatively, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (82.5 ± 8.3 vs 77.2 ± 11.5, respectively; P = .013), active abduction (157.8°± 27.1° vs 142.7°± 39.6°, respectively; P = .048), and glenohumeral abduction (45.6°± 10.4° vs 39.7°± 14.9°, respectively; P = .041) in the positive AAC group were significantly higher than those in the negative AAC group, while the retear rate (23.9% vs 44.2%, respectively; P = .035) and proximal humeral migration (1.7 ± 1.0 vs 2.3 ± 1.2 mm, respectively; P = .006) were significantly lower in the positive AAC group than in the negative AAC group. Smaller AAC (odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-1.00]; P = .040), larger GTE (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]; P = .017), and a higher GFII (OR, 3.49 [95% CI, 1.09-11.19]; P = .036) were associated with an increased risk of a rotator cuff retear.

CONCLUSION

Increased AAC was associated with a lower retear rate and better functional outcomes after arthroscopic repair of AP-MRCTs. A preliminary risk evaluation integrating GTE, the GFII, and AAC is recommended to consider the necessity of additional procedures for patients in need of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Shoulder Instability With a Clinically Relevant Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Model

BACKGROUND

Existing biomechanical studies of posterior glenoid bone loss and labral pathology are limited by their use of anterior instability models, which differ in both orientation and morphology and have been performed in only a single, neutral arm position.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical effectiveness of a posterior labral repair in the setting of a clinically relevant posterior bone loss model in various at-risk arm positions.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in 7 consecutive states using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm: (1) native, (2) posterior labral tear (6-9 o'clock), (3) posterior labral repair, (4) mean posterior glenoid bone loss (7%) with labral tear, (5) mean posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair, (6) large posterior glenoid bone loss (28%) with labral tear, and (7) large posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair. Bone loss was created using 3-dimensional printed computed tomography model templates. Biomechanical testing consisted of 75 N of posterior-inferior force and 75 N of compression at 60° and 90° of flexion and scaption. Posterior-inferior translation, lateral translation, and peak dislocation force were measured for each condition.

RESULTS

Labral repair significantly increased dislocation force independent of bone loss state between 10.1 and 14.8 N depending on arm position. Dislocation force significantly decreased between no bone loss and small bone loss (11.9-13.5 N), small bone loss and large bone loss (9.4-14.3 N), and no bone loss and large bone loss (21.2-26.5 N). Labral repair significantly decreased posterior-inferior translation compared with labral tear states by a range of 1.0 to 2.3 mm. In the native state, the shoulder was most unstable in 60° of scaption, with 29.9 ± 6.1-mm posterior-inferior translation.

CONCLUSION

Posterior labral repair improved stability of the glenohumeral joint, and even in smaller to medium amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss the glenohumeral stability was maintained with labral repair in this cadaveric model. However, a labral repair with large bone loss could not improve stability to the native state.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows that larger amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss (>25%) may require bony augmentation for adequate stability.

Posterior stability of the shoulder depends on acromial anatomy: a biomechanical study of 3D surface models

PURPOSE

Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is commonly associated with static posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Scapulae with static/dynamic posterior instability feature a superiorly and horizontally oriented acromion. We investigated whether the acromion acts as a restraint to posterior humeral translation.

METHODS

Five three-dimensional (3D) printed scapula models were biomechanically tested. A statistical shape mean model (SSMM) of the normal scapula of 40 asymptomatic shoulders was fabricated. Next, a SSMM of scapular anatomy associated with posterior subluxation was generated using data of 20 scapulae ("B1"). This model was then used to generate three models of surgical correction: glenoid version, acromial orientation, and acromial and glenoid orientation. With the joint axially loaded (100N) and the humerus stabilized, an anterior translation force was applied to the scapula in 35°, 60° and 75° of glenohumeral flexion. Translation (mm) was measured.

RESULTS

In the normal scapula, the humerus translates significantly less to contact with the acromion compared to all other configurations (p < .000 for all comparisons; i.e. 35°: "normal" 8,1 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1" 11,9 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 12,2 mm (± 0,2) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 13,3 mm (± 0,1)). Restoration of normal translation was only achieved with correction of glenoid and acromial anatomy (i.e. 75°: "normal" 11 mm (± 0,8) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 17,5 mm (± 0,1) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 19,7 mm (± 1,3) versus "B1 Glenoid + Acromion Correction" 11,5 mm (± 1,1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence or recurrence of static/dynamic posterior instability after correction of glenoid version alone may be related to incomplete restoration of the intrinsic stability that is conferred by a normal acromial anatomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

biomechanical study.

Correction of Static Posterior Shoulder Subluxation by Restoring Normal Scapular Anatomy Using Acromion and Glenoid Osteotomies: A Case Report

CASE

A 40-year-old man presented with progressive shoulder pain, associated with static posterior subluxation and mild eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Compared with a mean statistical shape model of a normal shoulder, the patient's acromion was abnormally high and horizontal, and the glenoid abnormally inclined inferiorly and minimally retroverted. Restoration of normal scapular anatomy using 3-dimensional planned acromial and glenoid osteotomies led to recentering of the joint and full shoulder function up to 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The correction of associated acromial and glenoid malformation can revert early static posterior subluxation of the shoulder. Whether successful recentering prevents progression of osteoarthritis remains to be established.

Mid-term to long-term results of open posterior bone block grafting in recurrent posterior shoulder instability: a clinical and CT-based analysis

Background

There is little consensus on the best treatment after failed conservative management of recurrent posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to analyze our clinical and radiological mid-term to long-term results of an open, posterior bone block procedure for the treatment of recurrent posterior shoulder instability.

Methods

From 1999 to 2015, 14 patients were included in the study and available for clinical and radiographic follow-up (FU). FU included a standardized physical examination, assessment of the Constant-Murley-Score, subjective shoulder value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Conventional radiographs and a computed tomography (CT)-scan were performed preoperatively and at latest FU. Glenohumeral arthropathy was classified as per Samilson and Prieto. The CT scans were used to evaluate the structure of the graft (resorption, union), graft positioning, glenoid version, centering of the humeral head, and glenoid erosion and morphology.

Results

The median age at the time of surgery was 26 years (range 16-41 years) and the median FU period was 9 years (range 4-20 years). The rate of reported dynamic postoperative subluxation and instability was 46% (n = 6) and the rate of dynamic posterior instability during clinical testing at FU was 31% (n = 4). The tested instability rate in the traumatic group was 14% (n = 1) compared to the atraumatic group with 50% (n = 3) during clinical FU. The mean Constant-Murley-Score increased from preoperatively (77 ± 11 points) to postoperatively (83 ± 14 points, P = .158). The last FU showed an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 85 ± 12; the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score was 715 ± 475 points. The mean subjective shoulder value increased from 58% ± 19 preoperatively to 73% ± 17 at final FU (P = .005). Degenerative changes increased by at least one grade in 67% of the patients. Mean preoperative glenoid retroversion (CT) was 7.5° ± 6°. The position of the graft was optimal in 86% (n = 12). In 62% of the cases, a major resorption of the graft (Zhu grade II) was observed.

Conclusion

The rate of tested recurrent instability at last FU was as high as 31% (n = 4, atraumatic [n = 3] vs. traumatic [n = 1]) after a median FU of 9 years. Given the moderate improvement of clinical outcome scores, shoulder stability and the increase of degenerative joint changes by at least one grade (Samilson/Prieto) in 67% of patients, a posterior bone block procedure is not a uniformly satisfying treatment option for recurrent posterior shoulder subluxation, especially in cases of atraumatic posterior instability.

Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss and Instability: An Evidence-based Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Posterior glenohumeral instability is an underappreciated cause of disability that may necessitate surgical intervention to allow functional glenoid restoration. However, posterior glenoid bone abnormalities, when sufficiently severe, may contribute to persistent instability despite a well-performed capsulolabral repair. Recognition and understanding of these lesions is critical to both surgical decision making and execution of the surgical plan. Numerous procedures have been described to address posterior instability including recent developments in arthroscopic grafting techniques. The purpose of this article was to provide an evidence-based strategy for diagnosis and management of posterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss.

Imaging Posterior Instability of the Shoulder

Posterior instability of the shoulder is much less common than anterior instability with a clinical presentation that is often less obvious, making the diagnosis more challenging and more easily missed. We describe the imaging findings of posterior instability so the radiologist can make the diagnosis and provide a detailed description, enabling the surgeon to make more informed decisions regarding management and surgery.

The Thumb Test: A Simple Physical Examination Maneuver for the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Posterior Shoulder Instability

Posterior shoulder instability is becoming increasingly recognized in young active patient populations. Diagnosing posterior instability can be challenging because patients commonly present with a complaint of pain without a history of a dislocation or subluxation event. Additionally, a posterior labral tear is not always clearly visualized on advanced imaging studies. As such, physical examination is critical to the diagnosis. We report a simple physical examination maneuver for the diagnosis of symptomatic posterior shoulder instability. The thumb test attempts to replicate a posterior bone block procedure, helping to re-establish stability and relieve pain. The examiner places his or her thumb over the posterior glenohumeral joint line while the patient actively forward elevates the affected arm overhead. Improvement in pain and stability with this maneuver is diagnostic for symptomatic posterior shoulder instability. This test augments current physical examination maneuvers to assist with correctly diagnosing posterior shoulder instability.

Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair and Capsular Closure via Single Working Portal for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is a relatively less common form of instability that frequently affects young overhead or contact athletes. The etiology of PSI may be traumatic or atraumatic, with establishment of the diagnosis being more difficult in cases of atraumatic instability. Surgical management of PSI has evolved from open techniques to arthroscopic techniques. Posterior stabilization has commonly been performed with 2 posterior working portals with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe a technique for posterior labral repair using all-suture anchors with the patient in the beach-chair position via 1 working portal with capsular closure.

Long-term results after posterior open glenoid wedge osteotomy for posterior shoulder instability associated with excessive glenoid retroversion

BACKGROUND

Treatment of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) associated with excessive glenoid retroversion is a rare, challenging problem in shoulder surgery. One proposed technique is posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy to correct excessive glenoid retroversion as described by Scott. However, this operation is rarely performed, and limited long-term outcomes using this approach are available. The goal of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion.

METHODS

Six consecutive patients (7 shoulders) with a mean age of 24 years (range 19-34) were treated with posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with a glenoid retroversion greater than 15° and followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean age of 15 years (range 10-19).

RESULTS

Recurrent, symptomatic PSI was observed in 6 of 7 shoulders (86%). One necessitated revision with a posterior (iliac crest) bone block procedure and was rated as a failure and excluded from functional analysis. One patient rated his result as excellent, 3 as good, 1 as fair, and 1 as unsatisfactory. Mean relative Constant Score (CS%) was unchanged from preoperation to final follow-up (CS% = 72%) and pain did not significantly decrease (Constant Score = 7-10 points; P = .969). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) improved postoperatively, but with 6 patients the improvement did not reach statistical significance (SSV = 42%-67%, P = .053) and the total Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index averaged 30% at the final follow-up. Mean glenoid retroversion of all 7 shoulders was corrected from 20° (range 16°-26°) to 3° (range -3° to +8°) (P = .018). In the 5 shoulders with preoperative static posterior subluxation of the humeral head, the humeral head was not recentered. All 7 shoulders showed progression of glenoid arthritic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion neither reliably restored shoulder stability nor recentered the joint or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. Alternative treatments for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion have to be developed and evaluated.

The Cartilage Wear Index: A new evaluation method to improve patient selection in surgical treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability

Background

The purpose of this study was to validate glenoid cartilage lesions as a negative prognostic factor and to define a new image-based preoperative evaluation method to identify surgical candidates for arthroscopic labral refixation with suture anchors in posterior shoulder instability.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair for shoulder instability were evaluated. Only patients with structural dynamic posterior instability were included. We evaluated on preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram: glenoid version, humeral head subluxation, type of capsular insertion, and the cartilage lesions using the new Cartilage Wear Index (CWI). Two subgroups were analyzed with regard to the preoperative CWI and shoulder outcome scores: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

Results

The median age at operation was 28 (interquartile range = 21-33) years. Median overall postoperative outcome assessment demonstrated a SANE of 90 and a WOSI of 385. The median CWI was 1.02. Subgroup analysis revealed worse median WOSI and SANE scores in patients with a CWI >1.02 and a strong correlation between a high preoperative CWI and a higher postoperative WOSI score (R = 0.58; P = .038).

Conclusion

The CWI can be useful to identify patients who might obtain better outcomes when treated with arthroscopic labral repair in posterior shoulder instability.

High Incidence of Anterior Shoulder Pain in Young Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of anterior shoulder pain in young athletes undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability and in patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain treated without biceps tenodesis at the time of arthroscopic posterior labral repair who underwent a revision biceps tenodesis procedure at short-term follow up.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed at a single institution over a 24-month period. The study included young patients who underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The electronic medical record, magnetic resonance arthrograms, and arthroscopic images were reviewed to exclude patients with posterior labral tears with anterior labral tear or SLAP (superior labrum anterior-to-posterior) tear extension on advanced imaging and arthroscopic examination. Data collected included the presence of preoperative tenderness to palpation of the biceps tendon in the groove, the results of a preoperative Speed test, postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value, the presence of postoperative anterior shoulder pain, and the need for a secondary biceps tenodesis.

Results

We identified 65 patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair for posterior shoulder instability. From this cohort, 26 patients with symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair. The incidence of preoperative anterior shoulder pain with Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness and a positive Speed test was identified in 20 of 26 patients (76.9%). Of 26 patients, 5 (19%) had concomitant biceps tenodesis. The median postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (interquartile range, 60-90) at median follow-up of 2.1 years. Of the 20 patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain, 8 of 20 (40%) reported persistent anterior pain. One patient (4.7%) underwent a secondary biceps tenodesis.

Conclusions

There is a high incidence of anterior shoulder pain and Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness in patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic posterior labral repair for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. At short-term follow-up, few patients required a secondary biceps tenodesis procedure; however, 30% of patients had persistent anterior shoulder pain.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective diagnostic case series.

Posterior Open-wedge Osteotomy and Glenoid Concavity Reconstruction Using an Implant-free, J-shaped Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Atraumatic Posterior Instability with Pathologic Glenoid Retroversion and Dysplasia: A Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND

Atraumatic posterior shoulder instability in patients with pathologic glenoid retroversion and dysplasia is an unsolved problem in shoulder surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a preliminary study of a small group of patients with atraumatic posterior shoulder instability associated with glenoid retroversion ≥ 15° and glenoid dysplasia who underwent posterior open-wedge osteotomy and glenoid concavity reconstruction using an implant-free, J-shaped iliac crest bone graft, we asked: (1) What proportion of the patients had persistent apprehension? (2) What were the improvements in patient-reported shoulder scores? (3) What were the radiographic findings at short-term follow-up?

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018, we treated seven patients for atraumatic posterior shoulder instability. We performed this intervention when posterior shoulder instability symptoms were unresponsive to physiotherapy for at least 6 months and when it was associated with glenoid retroversion ≥ 15° and dysplasia of the posteroinferior glenoid. All seven patients had a follow-up examination at a minimum of 2 years. The median (range) age at surgery was 27 years (16 to 45) and the median follow-up was 2.3 years (2 to 3). Apprehension was assessed by a positive posterior apprehension and/or posterior jerk test. Patient-reported shoulder scores were obtained and included the subjective shoulder value, obtained by chart review (and scored with 100% representing a normal shoulder; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 12%), and the Constant pain scale score (with 15 points representing no pain; MCID 1.5 points). Radiographic measurements included glenohumeral arthropathy and posterior humeral head subluxation, bone graft union, correction of glenoid retroversion and glenoid concavity depth, as well as augmentation of glenoid surface area. All endpoints were assessed by individuals not involved in patient care.

RESULTS

In four of seven patients, posterior apprehension was positive, but none reported resubluxation. The preoperative subjective shoulder value (median [range] 40% [30% to 80%]) and Constant pain scale score (median 7 points [3 to 13]) were improved at latest follow-up (median subjective shoulder value 90% [70% to 100%]; p = 0.02; median Constant pain scale score 15 points [10 to 15]; p = 0.03). Posterior glenoid cartilage erosion was present in four patients (all four had Walch Type B1 glenoids) preoperatively and showed no progression until the final follow-up examination. The median (range) humeral head subluxation index decreased from 69% (54% to 85%) preoperatively to 55% (46% to 67%) postoperatively (p = 0.02), and in two of four patients with preoperative humeral head subluxation (> 65% subluxation), it was reversed to a centered humeral head. CT images showed union in all implant-free, J-shaped iliac crest bone grafts. The median preoperative retroversion was corrected from 16° (15° to 25°) to 0° postoperatively (-5° to 6°; p = 0.02), the median glenoid concavity depth was reconstructed from 0.3 mm (-0.7 to 1.6) preoperatively to 1.2 mm (1.1 to 3.1) postoperatively (p = 0.02), and the median preoperative glenoid surface area was increased by 20% (p = 0.02). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded, and no reoperation was performed or is planned.

CONCLUSION

In this small, retrospective series of patients treated by experienced shoulder surgeons, a posterior J-bone graft procedure was able to reconstruct posterior glenoid morphology, correct glenoid retroversion, and improve posterior shoulder instability associated with pathologic glenoid retroversion and dysplasia, although four of seven patients had persistent posterior apprehension. Although no patients in this small series experienced complications, the size and complexity of this procedure make it likely that as more patients have it, some will develop complications; future studies will need to characterize the frequency and severity of those complications, and we recommend that this procedure be done only by experienced shoulder surgeons. The early results in these seven patients justify further study of this procedure for the proposed indication, but longer term follow-up is necessary to continue to assess whether it is advantageous to combine the reconstruction of posterior glenoid concavity with correction of pathological glenoid retroversion and increasing glenoid surface compared with traditional surgical techniques such as the posterior opening wedge osteotomy or simple posterior bone block procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The critical shoulder angle does not change over time: a radiographic study

BACKGROUND

The anatomy of the scapula may predispose individuals to develop shoulder pathologies. The purpose of this study was to determine if the scapular anatomy, in particular the critical shoulder angle (CSA), changes over a long-term follow-up, or if it is a stable parameter. We hypothesized that increasing age would not influence the scapular morphology.

METHODS

We analyzed shoulder radiographs in our database from 2002 to 2019 to extract radiographs at an interval of at least 10 years. Radiographic analysis included measuring the CSA and assessing the acromion type according to Bigliani and Morrison, the posterior acromial height and the posterior acromial tilt.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (47 shoulders) with a mean age of 53 years (range, 15-76; standard deviation [SD], ±14) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean interval between the 2 sets of radiographs was 12 years (range, 10-16; SD ±2).The mean CSA did not change significantly with 34° (range, 20-41; SD ±4) at the first and 34° (range, 19-44; SD ±5) (P = .597) at the second assessment. On the initial lateral radiographs ("Neer view"), there were 11 type 1 (24%), 32 type 2 (70%), and 3 type 3 (6%) acromia according to Bigliani and Morrison. At the second assessment, there were 16 type 1 (34%), 28 type 2 (60%), and 3 type 3 (7%). Between both sets of radiographs, 11 were different (23%), without a trend in the type of change being discernible. The posterior acromial height was stable with 19 mm (range, 2-36; SD ±8) at the first and 18 mm (range, 5-38; SD ±8) at the second assessment (P = .186). The posterior acromion tilt changed from 59° (range, 34-81; SD ±10) to 62° (range, 30-81; SD ±10) (P < .001). Among 6 cases with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) already at the first assessment, the CSA did not change significantly at 10 years' follow-up (P = .414). Among the 10 cases with new RCTs at the second assessment, the CSA did not change significantly at 10 years' follow-up from 34° (range, 25-41; SD ±5) to 35° (range, 24-44; SD ±6) (P = .510). In the group of 31 shoulders without RCT, the mean CSA at the first assessment of 34° (range, 28-41; SD ±3) stayed also stable with 34° (range, 28-40; SD ±3) (P = .796).

CONCLUSION

The CSA is an anatomical parameter of the scapula that does not change in size after closure of the physes.

Muscle volume imbalance may be associated with static posterior humeral head subluxation

BACKGROUND

The transverse force couple (TFC) of the rotator cuff (subscapularis vs. infraspinatus and teres minor muscle) is an important dynamic stabilizer of the shoulder joint in the anterior-posterior direction. In patients with posterior static subluxation of the humeral head (PSSH), decentration of the humeral head posteriorly occurs, which is associated with premature arthritis. We hypothesize that not only pathologic glenoid retroversion but also chronic muscle volume imbalance in the transverse force couple leads to PSSH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the TFC muscle volumes of 9 patients with symptomatic, atraumatic PSSH, within 8 were treated with glenoid correction osteotomy, was conducted. The imaging data (CT) of 9 patients/10 shoulders of the full scapula and shoulder were analyzed, and the muscle volumes of the subscapularis (SSC), infraspinatus (ISP) and teres minor muscles (TMM) were measured by manually marking the muscle contours on transverse slices and calculating the volume from software. Furthermore, the glenoid retroversion and glenohumeral distance were measured.

RESULTS

The mean glenoid retroversion was - 16° (- 7° to - 31°). The observed mean glenohumeral distance was 4.0 mm (0 to 6.8 mm). Our study population showed a significant muscle volume imbalance between the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles (192 vs. 170 ml; p = 0.005). There was no significant correlation between the subscapularis muscle volume and the glenohumeral distance (r = 0.068), (p = 0.872).

CONCLUSION

The muscle volume of the SSC in patients with PSSH was significantly higher than the muscle volume of the posterior force couple (ISP and TMM). This novel finding, albeit in a small series of patients, may support the theory that transverse force couple imbalance is associated with PSSH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 - Case series with no comparison group.

Chronic Pseudoparalysis Needs to Be Distinguished From Pseudoparesis: A Structural and Biomechanical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pseudoparalysis is generally defined as the inability to actively elevate the arm above 90° with free passive range of motion and no neurological deficits. It has been suggested that this arbitrary cutoff needs to be refined.

PURPOSE

To analyze whether there are structural and biomechanical differences in patients with chronic pseudoparalysis and those with chronic pseudoparesis.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 50 patients with chronic massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs; ≥2 tendons) and free passive and active scapular plane abduction <90° were divided into 2 groups: pseudoparalysis group (n = 24; active scapular plane abduction, <45°) and pseudoparesis group (n = 26; active scapular plane abduction, >45° and <90°). Radiographic measurements included the critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral distance, posterior acromial tilt, anterior and posterior acromial coverages, and posterior acromial height on outlet views. Measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) included fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles, anterior (subscapularis) and posterior (infraspinatus/teres minor) tear extensions, and global (anterior + posterior) tear extension in the parasagittal plane. A published musculoskeletal model was used to simulate the effect of different mRCTs on the muscle force required for scapular plane abduction.

RESULTS

Plain radiographs revealed no differences between patients with chronic pseudoparalysis and those with pseudoparesis. MRI assessment showed significant differences between patients with chronic pseudoparalysis and those with pseudoparesis with respect to fatty infiltration of the subscapularis (2.9 vs 1.6; P < .001) and infraspinatus (3.6 vs 3.0; P < .001) muscles, and anterior (-23° vs 4°; P < .001), posterior (-23° vs -14°; P = .034), and global rotator cuff (225° vs 190°; P < .001) tear extensions. The anterior tear extension in patients with chronic pseudoparalysis always involved more than 50% of the subscapularis, which was associated with an odds ratio of 5 for inability to actively abduct more than 45°. The biomechanical model was unable to find a combination of muscles that could balance the arm in space when the tear extended beyond the supraspinatus and the cranial subscapularis.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that chronic pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis are associated with different structural lesions. In the setting of a chronic mRCT, involvement of more than 50% of the subscapularis tendon with fatty infiltration of stage 3 is associated with pseudoparalysis of active scapular plane abduction <45°. The key function of the subscapularis was confirmed in the biomechanical model.

Similar scapular morphology in patients with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability

Background

There is evidence that specific variants of scapular morphology are associated with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability. To this date, observations regarding glenoid and/or acromial variants were analyzed independently, with two-dimensional imaging or without comparison with a healthy control group. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the three-dimensional (3D) shape of the scapula in healthy and in shoulders with static or dynamic posterior instability using 3D surface models and 3D measurement methods.

Methods

In this study, 30 patients with unidirectional posterior instability and 20 patients with static posterior humeral head subluxation (static posterior instability, Walch B1) were analyzed. Both cohorts were compared with a control group of 40 patients with stable, centered shoulders and without any clinical symptoms. 3D surface models were obtained through segmentation of computed tomography images and 3D measurements were performed for glenoid (version and inclination) and acromion (tilt, coverage, height).

Results

Overall, the scapulae of patients with dynamic and static instability differed only marginally among themselves. Compared with the control group, the glenoid was 2.5° (P = .032), respectively, 5.7° (P = .001) more retroverted and 2.9° (P = .025), respectively, 3.7° (P = .014) more downward tilted in dynamic, respectively, static instability. The acromial roof of dynamic instability was significantly higher and on average 6.2° (P = .007) less posterior covering with an increased posterior acromial height of +4.8mm (P = .001). The acromial roof of static instability was on average 4.8° (P = .041) more externally rotated (axial tilt), 7.3° (P = .004) flatter (sagittal tilt), 8.3° (P = .001) less posterior covered with an increased posterior acromial height of +5.8 mm (0.001).

Conclusion

The scapula of shoulders with dynamic and static posterior instability is characterized by an increased glenoid retroversion and an acromion that is shorter posterolaterally, higher, and more horizontal in the sagittal plane. All these deviations from the normal scapula values were more pronounced in static posterior instability.

Scapulothoracic Alignment Alterations in Patients with Walch Type B Osteoarthritis: An In Vivo Dynamic Analysis and Prospective Comparative Study

Background: Kinematic changes of the scapulothoracic joint may influence the relative position of the glenoid fossa and, consequently, the glenohumeral joint. As the alignment of the scapula relative to the thorax differs between individuals, such variability may be another factor in the development of posterior head subluxation. The purpose of this study was to compare scapulothoracic alignment in pathologic type B shoulders with contralateral healthy shoulders. Methods: Seven adult volunteers with unilateral type B glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) underwent bilateral computed tomography (CT) scans of the shoulders and arms. A patient-specific, three-dimensional measurement technique that coupled medical imaging (i.e., CT) and optical motion capture was used. Results: The scapulothoracic distance at the trigonum was 75 ± 15 mm for pathologic shoulders and 78 ± 11 mm for healthy shoulders (p = 0.583), while at the inferior angle, it was 102 ± 18 mm for pathologic shoulders and 108 ± 12 mm for healthy shoulders (p = 0.466). Conclusion: Scapula positioning at a resting position did not differ between pathologic and healthy shoulders. However, pathologic shoulders tended to be limited in maximal glenohumeral motion and exhibited greater anterior tilt of the scapula in internal rotation at 90 degrees, which may be adaptive to the restricted glenohumeral motion.

Shoulder biomechanics in normal and selected pathological conditions

The stability of the glenohumeral joint depends on soft tissue stabilizers, bone morphology and dynamic stabilizers such as the rotator cuff and long head of the biceps tendon. Shoulder stabilization techniques include anatomic procedures such as repair of the labrum or restoration of bone loss, but also non-anatomic options such as remplissage or tendon transfers.

Rotator cuff repair should restore the cuff anatomy, reattach the rotator cable and respect the coracoacromial arch whenever possible. Tendon transfer, superior capsular reconstruction or balloon implantation have been proposed for irreparable lesions.

Shoulder rehabilitation should focus on restoring balanced glenohumeral and scapular force couples in order to avoid an upward migration of the humeral head and secondary cuff impingement. The primary goal of cuff repair is to be as anatomic as possible and to create a biomechanically favourable environment for tendon healing.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:508-518. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200006

Association between shoulder coracoacromial arch morphology and anterior instability of the shoulder

Background

Glenohumeral instability is a common condition of the shoulder. Glenoid bone loss and humeral head bone loss are well recognized as risk factors for recurrent instability. There are few studies in the literature that examine the role of coracoacromial arch anatomy in the pathogenesis of glenohumeral instability. Previous reports found an association between posterior acromial coverage (PAC) and posterior instability. We hypothesize that coracoacromial arch anatomy is related to anterior shoulder instability.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 50 patients with unidirectional anterior shoulder instability were matched to a control group of 50 glenohumeral arthritis patients without any history of shoulder instability. Radiographic measurements of the coracoacromial arch anatomy were made: shoulder arch angle, scapular Y angle, anterior coracoid tilt (ACT), posterior acromial tilt, anterior acromial coverage angle, PAC angle, coracoid height, posterior acromial height, and critical shoulder angle were determined using standard lateral scapular and anteroposterior radiographs.

Results

Logistic regression analyses found a significant association between the presence of anterior instability and flatter coracoacromial arch angles (mean, 124.1°) vs. the arthritis control group (mean, 120.6°) (odds ratios [OR] = 1.113; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.039-1.191; P = .002). There was a significant association between anterior instability and ACT (OR = 1.144; 95% CI = 1.053-1.243; P = .001), whereas a negative association was found between anterior instability and PAC (OR = 0.909; 95% CI = 0.853-0.969; P = .004) and posterior acromial tilt (OR = 0.878; 95% CI = 0.773-0.998; P = .046). Lower critical shoulder angle values were associated with the arthritis group (28.2° vs. 33.9°) (OR = 1.555; 95% CI = 1.202-2.012; P = .001).

Conclusions

Shoulder coracoacromial arch morphology may play a role in the stability of the shoulder joint and development of recurrent anterior instability. Shoulders with a decreased shoulder arch angle, a less contained and flatter coracoacromial arch and larger ACT, were associated with anterior instability. This study identifies the shoulder coracoacromial arch angle and anterior coracoid tile angles as risk factors for anterior shoulder instability. Our findings suggest that measuring these angles may help orthopedic surgeons understand the risk of anterior instability and analyze risk factors to improve clinical decision making.

Scapular Morphologic Characteristics and Rotator Cuff Tear Pattern Are Independently Associated With Chronic Pseudoparalyis: A Matched-Pair Analysis of Patients With Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

It is unclear which structural parameters determine the development or the absence of chronic pseudoparalysis (PP) in patients with massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs).

PURPOSE

To determine whether scapular morphologic characteristics and extent of rotator cuff tearing are independent factors associated with chronic PP.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, 50 patients with chronic mRCT (≥2 fully detached tendons) and active scapular plane abduction less than 90° (PP group) were age- and sex-matched with a cohort of 50 patients with chronic mRCT and an active scapular plane abduction greater than 90° (non-PP; NPP group). Analysis of standardized, plain radiographs included measurement of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the acromiohumeral distance (ACHD) on anteroposterior views and measurement of posterior acromial tilt, anterior and posterior acromial coverage, and posterior acromial height on standardized outlet views. Measurements on magnetic resonance imaging included fatty muscle infiltration, anterior (subscapularis) and posterior (infraspinatus/teres minor) tear extension, and global tear extension (anterior + posterior tear extension) in the parasagittal plane.

RESULTS

Overall, no significant difference was found in patients' demographic characteristics (P > .05). Univariate analyses confirmed significant differences between the PP and NPP groups in active scapular plane abduction (51°± 22° vs 135°± 29°; P < .001). Multivariate analyses revealed independent factors associated with PP compared with the NPP group: CSA (38.2°± 4.6° vs 35.2°± 3.7°; P = .001); ACHD (4.7 ± 2.2 vs 7.3 ± 2.6 mm; P < .001); posterior acromial height (22 ± 10 vs 17 ± 7 mm; P = .005); and anterior (-9°± 21° vs 25°± 12°; P < .001) and posterior (-18°± 14° vs 2°± 14°; P < .001) tear extension. The NPP group had significantly less involvement and fatty infiltration of the subscapularis (1.4 ± 0.6) compared with the PP group (2.2 ± 0.9) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that global RCT extension and the quality of the inferior half of the subscapularis are significantly associated with chronic pseudoparalysis. The study further shows that acromial morphologic characteristics are relevant in the development of pseudoparalysis. Patients with pseudoparalysis have a larger CSA, less ACHD, and a higher positioned acromion in the sagittal plane.