What's Important: Managing the Impact of Coronavirus on Pediatric Spine Surgery

Novel Machine Vision Image Guidance System Significantly Reduces Procedural Time and Radiation Exposure Compared With 2-dimensional Fluoroscopy-based Guidance in Pediatric Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy imaging has been commonly adopted for guidance during complex pediatric spinal deformity correction. Despite the benefits, fluoroscopy imaging emits harmful ionizing radiation, which has been well-established to have deleterious effects on the surgeon and operating room staff. This study investigated the difference in intraoperative fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during pediatric spine surgery between 2D fluoroscopy-based navigation and a novel machine vision navigation system [machine vision image guidance system (MvIGS)].

METHODS

This retrospective chart review was conducted at a pediatric hospital with patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformity correction from 2018 to 2021. Patient allocation to the navigation modality was determined by the date of their surgery and the date of implementation of the MvIGS. Both modalities were the standard of care. Intraoperative radiation exposure was collected from the fluoroscopy system reports.

RESULTS

A total of 1442 pedicle screws were placed in 77 children: 714 using MvIGS and 728 using 2D fluoroscopy. There were no significant differences in the male-to-female ratio, age range, body mass index, distribution of spinal pathologies, number of levels operated on, types of levels operated on, and the number of pedicle screws implanted. Total intraoperative fluoroscopy time was significantly reduced in cases utilizing MvIGS (18.6 ± 6.3 s) compared with 2D fluoroscopy (58.5 ± 19.0 s) ( P < 0.001). This represents a relative reduction of 68%. Intraoperative radiation dose area product and cumulative air kerma were reduced by 66% (0.69 ± 0.62 vs 2.0 ± 2.1 Gycm 2 , P < 0.001) and 66% (3.4 ± 3.2 vs 9.9 ± 10.5 mGy, P < 0.001) respectively. The length of stay displayed a decreasing trend with MVIGS, and the operative time was significantly reduced in MvIGS compared with 2D fluoroscopy for an average of 63.6 minutes (294.5 ± 15.5 vs 358.1 ± 60.6 min, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In pediatric spinal deformity correction surgery, MvIGS was able to significantly reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy time, intraoperative radiation exposure, and total surgical time, compared with traditional fluoroscopy methods. MvIGS reduced the operative time by 63.6 minutes and reduced intraoperative radiation exposure by 66%, which may play an important role in reducing the risks to the surgeon and operating room staff associated with radiation in spinal surgery procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective comparative study.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on spinal surgery

The impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare services around the world has been unprecedented. Surgical specialities, in particular, had to respond rapidly and adapt to continue to meet the needs of their patients in this ever-evolving and uncertain situation. With the cancellation of elective surgery and outpatient clinics, the majority of work carried out by spinal surgeons was obliterated. It was imperative emergency spinal care continued throughout the pandemic, with the creation of guidelines to assist spinal surgeons manage patients appropriately. Alongside assisting on the frontline, spinal surgeons had to triage referrals to ensure urgent care was still provided, undertake outpatient clinics virtually and ensure educational opportunities were available for colleagues. Paediatric spinal surgery was affected by the pandemic; although the virus did not significantly impact children to the same extent, a notable consequence of the lockdown restrictions was a reduction in GP referrals into the specialist service. In the event of any future pandemics, national spinal organizations have created guidelines to assist in the prioritization and care of spinal pathologies. While a 'return to normality' is a long way off, the impact of the past year will undoubtedly change spinal surgeons and their practice forever.

The impact of COVID-19 on idiopathic scoliosis referrals: cause for concern

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the short-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demographic and clinical profile of new idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients, with a particular focus on treatment and late referral. The COVID-19 pandemic has limited health-care services and public access and, as a result, the diagnosis and management of non-COVID-19 health conditions have been compromised. Delayed diagnosis of IS may limit conservative treatment options and subsequently, increase a patient's risk of requiring surgical intervention.

METHODS

The volume of spine referrals received and new IS clinic visits were compared between March 15-October 15, 2019 and the same period in 2020. A chart and radiographic review detailed the patient profile at initial presentation. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses examined the referral source, curve magnitude, skeletal maturity, and prescribed treatment. Late referrals were those with a curve magnitude ≥ 50°, or > 40° and Risser 2 or less.

RESULTS

During the 2020 study period, the referral volume decreased 76% and clinic visits 55%. The 2019 cohort was similar in age (13.7 ± 2.1 years vs 13.3 ± 2.3 years, p = 0.08), Risser score distribution (p = 0.32), menarchal status (0.07), and curve magnitude (37.1° ± 3.8° vs 39.0° ± 16.0°, p = 0.22). During the pandemic, there was an increased proportion of referrals made by pediatricians (41 to 54%, p = 0.01). The proportion of brace prescriptions increased from 30 to 42% (p = 0.01). The proportion of surgical bookings and late referrals were increased but did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

Despite no significant increase in the magnitude of the curve at initial presentation or the proportion of late referrals, there was a marked decrease in referral volume, over the first 7 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests that the majority of expected new IS patients remain undiagnosed. A future increase in late referrals should be anticipated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Universal Screening for COVID-19 in Children Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery: A Multicenter Report

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially altered the typical process around performing surgery to ensure protection of health care workers, patients, and their families. One safety precaution has been the implementation of universal preoperative screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study examines the results of universal screening on children undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating the incidence and symptomatology of COVID-19 in all patients presenting for orthopaedic surgery at 3 pediatric tertiary care children's hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (March to June 2020). All patients underwent universal screening with a nasopharyngeal swab to detect presence of SARS-CoV-2. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for positive COVID-19 screening.

RESULTS

In total, 1198 patients underwent preoperative screening across all 3 institutions and 7 (0.58%) had detection of SARS-CoV-2. The majority of patients (1/7, 86%) were asymptomatic. Patients that tested positive were significantly more likely to be Hispanic (P=0.046) and had greater number of medical comorbidities (P=0.013), as scored on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score. A known COVID-19 positive contact was found to be a significant risk factor in the multivariate analysis (P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Early results of universal preoperative screening for COVID-19 demonstrates a low incidence and high rate of asymptomatic patients. Health care professionals, especially those at higher risk for the virus, should be aware of the challenges related to screening based solely on symptoms or travel history and consider universal screening for patients undergoing elective surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.