Comparing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Renal Transplant Recipients to Patients on Dialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease: A Nationally Matched Analysis

Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes before or after Renal Transplant: A Retrospective Large Cohort Analysis

Background

While it is known that patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at an increased risk of complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is a gap in the literature in comparing patients with ESRD to patients who undergo renal transplant (RT) before or after THA. This study is to address this gap by analyzing outcomes of THA in ESRD patients, RT patients, and RT candidates.

Methods

Using the PearlDiver Mariner database, ESRD patients, RT patients, and RT candidates undergoing primary THA were identified and compared. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were done for medical complications up to 90 days and surgical complications up to 2 years. Ninety-day emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient readmission were also documented.

Results

A total of 7,868 patients were included: 5,092 had ESRD, 2,520 had RT before THA, and 256 were candidates for RT. Compared to patients with ESRD, RT patients demonstrated lower rates of medical complications such as pneumonia (3.61% vs. 5.99%, p = 0.039) and transfusion (4.60% vs. 7.66%, p < 0.001). Additionally, RT patients displayed decreased rates of surgical complications, including wound complications (2.70% vs. 4.22%, p = 0.001), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at 1 year (2.30% vs. 4.81%, p < 0.001) and 2 years (2.58% vs. 5.42%, p < 0.001), and aseptic loosening at 2 years (0.79% vs. 1.43%, p = 0.006). Similarly, when compared to RT candidates, RT patients demonstrated a lower incidence of postoperative complications, including 1-year PJI (2.30% vs. 5.08%, p = 0.013), 2-year PJI (2.58% vs. 5.08%, p = 0.028), 1-year aseptic loosening (0.56% vs. 2.73%, p < 0.001), and 2-year aseptic loosening (0.79% vs. 2.73%, p = 0.005). RT patients also had lower rates of ED visits and hospital readmissions.

Conclusions

Compared to ESRD patients and RT candidates, patients with RT have a significantly lower likelihood of medical complications, PJI, aseptic hardware loosening, ED visits, and hospital readmission. Patients with ESRD on the RT waiting list should delay THA until after RT surgery. For those not eligible for RT, it is vital to take extra precautions to reduce the risk of complications.

In-hospital complications and readmission patterns in 13,937 patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing total hip arthroplasty: Evidence from the Chinese national database

PURPOSE

Clarifying the prognosis and readmission patterns of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) would provide important references for clinical management for this population. Using the Chinese national inpatient database (i.e., Hospital Quality Monitoring System [HQMS]), we aimed to compare in-hospital complications and readmission patterns following THA in patients with DDH and primary osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing THA for DDH and OA between 2013 and 2019 were identified using the HQMS. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. After propensity score matching, in-hospital complications and readmission patterns were compared using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

According to the analysis of 13,937 propensity-score matched pairs, there were no significant differences in the incidence of in-hospital death (0.01 % vs 0.04 %, P = 0.142), transfusion (8.09 % vs 7.89 %, P = 0.536), wound infection (0.31 % vs 0.25 %, P = 0.364), deep venous thrombosis (0.45 % vs 0.43 %, P = 0.786), pulmonary embolism (0.03 % vs 0.05 %, P = 0.372) or all-cause readmission (2.87 % vs 3.12 %, P = 0.219) between two groups. However, DDH patients had higher surgical readmission rates than OA patients (1.43 % vs 1.14 %, P = 0.033). When analyzing causes of surgical readmission, DDH patients had increased risk of dislocation (0.37 % vs 0.21 %, P = 0.011) and aseptic loosening (0.17 % vs 0.07 %, P = 0.024) than OA patients.

CONCLUSION

DDH patients had an increased risk of surgical readmission following THA, mainly driven by dislocation and aseptic loosening, which should be recognized and appropriately prevented.

Trends, complications, and readmission of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in primary total hip arthroplasty in china: a national retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Decrease in allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported in the United States, but whether other countries share the same trend remains unclear. Additionally, the relation of allogenic RBC transfusion to the risk of complications in THA remains controversial. Using the Chinese national inpatient database, the current study aimed to examine trends, complications, charges, and readmission patterns of allogeneic RBC transfusion in THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA between 2013 and 2019 were included, and then stratified into the transfusion and the non-transfusion group based on the database transfusion records. A generalized estimating equation model was used to investigate trends in transfusion rates. After propensity-score matching, a logistic regression model was used to compare the complications, rates and causes of 30-day readmission between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 10,270 patients with transfusion and 123,476 patients without transfusion were included. Transfusion rates decreased from 19.11% in 2013 to 9.94% in 2019 (P for trend < 0.001). After matching, no significant differences in the risk of of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR], 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-18.83), wound infection (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.45-1.17), myocardial infarction (OR 1.17; 95%CI 0.62-2.19), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.25; 95%CI 0.88-1.78), pulmonary embolism (OR 2.25; 95%CI 0.98-5.17), readmission rates (OR 1.07; 95%CI 0.88-1.30) and readmission causes were observed between two groups. However, the transfusion group had higher hospitalization charges than the non-transfusion group (72,239.89 vs 65,649.57 Chinese yuan [CNY], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that allogeneic RBC transfusion in THA was not associated with the increased risk of complications and any-cause readmission. However, the currently restrictive transfusion policy should be continued because excessive blood transfusion may increase the socioeconomic burden.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dialysis-Dependent Patients: 35% Mortality at 5 years

BACKGROUND

Limited knowledge exists on contemporary results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in dialysis-dependent patients. We sought to analyze the mortality rates and cumulative incidences of any revision or reoperation in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing primary THAs.

METHODS

We identified 24 dialysis-dependent patients who underwent 28 primary THAs between 2000 and 2019 using our institutional total joint registry. Mean age was 57 years (range, 32 to 86), with 43% being women and mean body mass index was 31 (range, 20 to 50). The leading cause for dialysis was diabetic nephropathy (18%). The mean preoperative creatinine and glomerular filtration rate were 6 mg/dL and 13 mL/min, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship methods and a competing risk analysis using death as the competing risk were performed. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 2 to 15).

RESULTS

The 5-year survivorship free from death was 65%. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 8%. There were a total of 3 revisions as follows: 2 for aseptic loosening of the femoral component and one for a Vancouver B2 fracture. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 19%. There were 3 additional reoperations, and all were irrigation and debridement. Postoperative creatinine and glomerular filtration rate were 6 mg/dL and 15 mL/min, respectively. At a mean of 2 years after THA, 25% successfully received a renal transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis-dependent patients undergoing primary THAs had high 5-year mortality (35%) but an acceptably low cumulative incidence of any revision. While renal metrics remained consistent after THA, only one in 4 patients underwent successful renal transplant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Knee and hip arthroplasty joint surgical site wound infection in end-stage renal disease subjects who underwent dialysis or a kidney transplant: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study to assess the knee and hip arthroplasty joint surgical site wound infection (SSWI) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) subjects who underwent dialysis or a kidney transplant (KT). A comprehensive literature examination till February 2023 was implemented and 1046 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 5 471 898 subjects with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at the baseline, 13 049 of them were haemodialysis or renal transplant, and 5 458 849 were control. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of knee and hip arthroplasty SSWI in ESRD subjects who underwent dialysis or a KT by the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Haemodialysis or renal transplant had a significantly higher postoperative SSWI (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.62, P < .001) compared with control in TJA subjects. However, no significant difference was observed between haemodialysis and renal transplant in postoperative SSWI (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.16-5.54, P = .94) and between haemodialysis or renal transplant and control in prosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.25-4.55, P = .93) in TJA subjects. Haemodialysis had a significantly higher prosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.21-3.03, P = .005) compared with renal transplant in TJA subjects. Haemodialysis or renal transplant had a significantly higher postoperative SSWI in TJA subjects. Also, haemodialysis had a significantly higher prosthetic joint infection compared with renal transplant in TJA subjects. Although precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences because a low number of selected studies was picked for certain comparisons in this meta-analysis.

Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: Perioperative Optimization and Outcomes

The success of renal, liver, cardiac, pulmonary, and other solid organ transplantation (SOT) has resulted in increasing volume of transplant procedures and recipient survivorship. Subsequently, many SOT patients develop end-stage degenerative joint disease and are presenting for total hip or total knee arthroplasty more frequently. Surgeons must be aware of the medical complexities and prepare for the perioperative risks associated with these immunocompromised patients. Preoperative evaluation should be conducted in coordination with transplant specialists to ensure optimization, including appropriate surgical timing and advanced, organ-specific medical assessments. Although often unable to be modified, the transplant patient's antirejection medication regimens should be reviewed with understanding of inherent risks of poor wound healing or acute infection. Despite higher rates of complications, revision surgeries, and mortality compared with the general population, SOT recipients continue to demonstrate markedly improved pain relief, function, and quality of life. An ongoing multidisciplinary approach is required throughout the perioperative process and beyond to deliver successful outcomes after total joint arthroplasty in the SOT population.

Total joint arthroplasty following solid organ transplants: complications and mid-term outcomes

PURPOSE

Survival after solid organ transplant (SOT) is improving, and demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) among SOT recipients is rising. Outcomes including revision, periprosthetic joint infection, and survivorship based on SOT type are variable. We sought to compare peri-operative complications, implant survivorship, and mortality for patients undergoing TJA following SOT.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the institutional database for primary TJA among SOT recipients from 2000 to 2020 was performed. Revisions, conversion TJA, and patients with multiple organ transplants were excluded. Patients were stratified by transplant organ. Transfusions, 90-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits, revisions, and mortality were compared using descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazard ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 119 total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 63 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in SOT recipients were studied. Most common SOT was renal (39%), then lung (27%), liver (24%), and heart (10%). TKA postoperative transfusion rates varied by organ (p = 0.037; [heart 0%, liver 9.5%, renal 24.0%, lung 50.0%]). Implant survivorship was 95.6% at one year (95% CI 90.3-98.1) and 92.1% at four years (83.9-96.3). Mortality was 2.9% at one year (95% CI 1.1-7.4) and 23.2% at four years (95% CI 16.1-32.3). After adjusting for procedure, duration from transplant to TJA, age, and Elixhauser Index, lung recipients had higher mortality versus heart (RR 4.39 [95% CI 1.64-15.38]; p = 0.002), kidney (7.98 [3.04-24.61]; p < 0.001), and liver (7.98 [3.04-24.61; p < 0.001) patients.

CONCLUSION

TJA after SOT yields acceptable peri-operative outcomes and implant survivorship, but mortality risk is substantial, especially among lung transplant recipients.

Kidney transplant outcomes among recipients with post-transplant hip or knee joint replacement surgery

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at a higher risk of needing hip or knee replacement (joint replacement) surgery due to the high prevalence of degenerative joint disease and other conditions. However, there remains a large debate about the timing of joint replacement surgery and whether it should be pre- vs post-transplant. We conducted a retrospective study analyzing all adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) at our university hospital who had undergone subsequent joint replacement between 2001 and 2017. Transplant-specific outcomes of acute rejection, death censored graft failure (DCGF), and patient death post-joint replacement surgery were outcomes of interest. Controls were selected at a 1:3 ratio based on the incidence density sampling of post-transplant interval. There were 101 KTRs in the joint replacement group and were compared with 281 controls. In the multivariate analysis, the need for joint replacement was not associated with acute rejection (HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 0.77-3.29; p = 0.21); DCGF (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.49-1.60; p = 0.70) or patient death (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.55-1.38, p = 0.42). In selected KTRs, joint replacement surgery was not associated with detrimental transplant-specific outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.