Long-Term Survival of HINTEGRA Total Ankle Replacement in 683 Patients: A Concise 20-Year Follow-up of a Previous Report

Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total ankle replacement survivorship. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Main objective of this research is to know if there is a different survival rate between fixed bearing (FB) and mobile bearing (MB) total ankle replacement (TAR). We hypothesized that there are no differences between the survival rates of both implants.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases‎ to identify published studies from August 2018 to September 2022 including results for FB and MB TAR survivorship. Inclusion criteria included 1) primary TAR in one or both feet in which implant could be identified‎, 2) a minimum of 20 procedures reported, 3) reported implant survivorship or calculable and 4) a minimum of 12 months follow-up for level 1-3 studies or 60 months for level 4 studies.

RESULTS

3902 ankles in 28 studies were included. 719 were FB and 3104 MB with an overall survivorship of 94% (95% CI [0.89; 0.97]) and 89% (95% CI [0.86; 0.92]) respectively. After subgroup analysis, we did not find differences among both groups (p = ‎0.429‎). Meta-regression analysis showed that longer follow-up was associated with lower survival rates in MB group (p = 0.000) while no other relationships were found with other factors (age, level of evidence or conflict of interests).

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in survival rates between both groups were found. Age and other studied confounders were not found to be related with implant survivorship. However, longer follow-up was found to be related with lower survival rates. Studies with longer follow-up and higher level of evidence are needed to confirm results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies.

The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The success of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) involves objective and subjective parameters such as joint motion and implant survival. Patient-reported outcome measures provide key context from the patient's perspective so that we can evaluate the results of these procedures. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has demonstrated validity and reliability in other arthroplasties, but the existing evidence on the FJS in TAA is very limited.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

We aimed to assess the reliability, validity, responsiveness to change, and floor and ceiling effects, as well as to perform a gender analysis, of the FJS in patients who had undergone TAA.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent TAA at our institution between June 2021 and May 2023. The three-component TAA was performed through an anterior approach. A total of 120 patients (mean age 62 ± 10 years) participated, which was 83% (120 of 145) of those eligible, and 77% (92 of 120) of those patients underwent follow-up assessments at 12 ± 1 months after surgery. A cross-culturally adapted and validated version of the FJS in our language (Italian) was used. Additionally, three other commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for TAA were administered: the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the VAS.

RESULTS

Reliability was demonstrated by excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.95) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; standard error of measurement = 2.7). Robust validity was observed, in that the FJS had a strong correlation with the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, the MOXFQ, and the VAS (Pearson and Spearman values consistently above 0.7 or below -0.7). Responsiveness to change was observed between 6 and 12 months (Cohen d = 0.37). Low ceiling and floor effects at both 6 months (4% and 3% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) and 12 months (10% and 0% reached top and bottom scores, respectively) were demonstrated, below the recommended 15% interpretability threshold. No association between outcomes and patient gender was observed.

CONCLUSION

Test properties and validity of the FJS were strong in patients who underwent TAA. It seems suitable for clinical use, although future studies should seek to replicate or refute our findings in other patient populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Clinical Outcomes and Registry Data in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis consistently demonstrating good to excellent outcomes, even when considering factors such as deformity, patient age, bilaterality, and arthritis etiology. There is little consensus in the literature with regard to preferred patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) for assessing outcomes, although all metrics generally improve following TAA. Several countries have successful registries to track longevity of TAA in populations; however, PROMs are generally not successfully tracked in registries. A trend toward consensus on outcome metrics and collaborative registries is warranted to optimize patient selection and outcomes in TAA.

Lack of Consensus on the Definition of Aseptic Loosening in Total Ankle Replacement: A Narrative Systematic Review

Background: Aseptic loosening is one of the most common modes of failure of total ankle replacement (TAR). However, a precise definition of aseptic loosening is still lacking. This systematic review aimed to identify the variations of applied definitions and offer insights into the lack of consensus. Methods: Human studies reporting aseptic loosening of TAR published in peer-reviewed journals within the last decade were considered. The search strategy involved specific terms in Embase, MEDLINE ALL, and the Cochrane Library. Variations in aseptic loosening definitions were analysed. Results: Of 767 studies, 88 were included in this study. Only nine studies precisely defined aseptic loosening with significant variations. Twenty-two studies referenced the term and fifty-seven reported it as a complication but neither defined nor referenced it. Conclusions: Significant uncertainty exists regarding the universal definition of aseptic loosening of TAR, and many variations occur in terms of the assessment approach and criteria.

Outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty with an average follow-up of 10 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The literature demonstrating positive outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is mounting. However, the long-term outcomes of TAA (≥ 10 years) remain minimally reported. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate outcome metrics over multiple TAA studies with greater than 10 years of average follow-up.

METHODS

TAA studies were searched in Medline, Embase, and Scopus from the date of inception to September 12, 2022. Inclusion criteria included 1) studies of patients that underwent uncemented TAA, and 2) studies with an average follow-up time of at least ten years. Manuscripts in non-English languages and isolated abstracts were excluded. We collected American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores from the included studies for pooled meta-analysis. Due to the varying definition of survivability between studies, this metric was not assessed in our final evaluation.

RESULTS

Our data included approximately 3651 patients (3782 ankles). Of the 25 studies with an average follow-up of 10 years included in the systematic review, 5 provided pre- and post-operative AOFAS means and 5 provided pre- and post-operative VAS means with associated measures of variability and were included in our meta-analysis. The weighted mean difference between pre-and post-operative AOFAS and VAS scores was -40.36 (95% CI -47.24 to -33.47) and 4.52 (95% CI: 2.26-6.43), respectively. The risk of bias was low to moderate for the included studies.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes following TAA are favorable and indicate patient-reported outcome improvement over long-term follow-up. However, a significant amount of heterogeneity exists between studies. Future, prospective, randomized research should focus on standardizing outcome measures, survivorship, and complication reporting methodologies to allow for pooled meta-analyses of these important outcome metrics.

Survival and risk assessment in revision arthroplasty of the ankle

Aims

Implant failure has become more common as the number of primary total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) performed has increased. Although revision arthroplasty has gained attention for functional preservation, the long-term results remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of revision TAA using a mobile-bearing prosthesis in a considerably large cohort; the risk factors for failure were also determined.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (117 ankles) who underwent revision TAA for failed primary TAA between July 2000 and March 2010. Survival analysis and risk factor assessment were performed, and clinical performance and patient satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up.

Results

The mean duration from initial revision TAA to last follow-up was 15.0 years (SD 3.0; 11.2 to 20.5). The cumulative survival rates of the revised ankles were 81% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74% to 88%), 74% (65% to 82%), and 70% (61% to 79%) at five, ten, and 15 years, respectively. Comorbidities prior to primary TAA, aseptic loosening, instability, or grafting of cysts were found to be the most common risk factors for secondary revision. The median value for preoperative pain, as assessed using the visual analogue scale, declined from 6 (interquartile range (IQR) 5 to 8) to 2 (IQR 0 to 5) (p < 0.001) and the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved from 43 (SD 17) preoperatively to 70 (SD 20) (p < 0.001) at last follow-up.

Conclusion

Revision TAA offers acceptable survival rates after 15 years; it therefore offers a valuable option for treatment of implant failure in carefully selected cases. Although patient-reported outcomes improve substantially, the degree of improvement reported following primary TAA is not achieved.

Patient-related risk factors associated with poorer outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty

Aims

This scoping review aims to identify patient-related factors associated with a poorer outcome following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA).

Methods

A scoping review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A computer-based literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane trials, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently performed title/abstract and full-text screening according to predetermined selection criteria. English-language original research studies reporting patient-related factors associated with a poorer outcome following TAA were included. Outcomes were defined as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), perioperative complications, and failure.

Results

A total of 94 studies reporting 101,552 cases of TAA in 101,177 patients were included. The most common patient-related risk factor associated with poorer outcomes were younger age (21 studies), rheumatoid arthritis (17 studies), and diabetes (16 studies). Of the studies using multivariable regression specifically, the most frequently described risk factors were younger age (12 studies), rheumatoid arthritis (eight studies), diabetes (eight studies), and high BMI (eight studies).

Conclusion

When controlling for confounding factors, the most commonly reported risk factors for poor outcome are younger age, rheumatoid arthritis, and comorbidities such as diabetes and increased BMI. These patient-related risk factors reported may be used to facilitate the refinement of patient selection criteria for TAA and inform patient expectations.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty: is controlled diabetes mellitus a risk factor?

BACKGROUND

It is still uncertain whether diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for poor outcomes and increased complications after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and complication rates of TAA in patients with and without DM.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients with symptomatic end-stage ankle osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up period of 24 months after TAA. A total of 252 patients (266 ankles) were classified into two groups according to the presence of DM: (1) DM group (59 patients, 67 ankles) and (2) non-DM group (193 patients, 199 ankles). We defined controlled diabetes as (1) HbA1c level < 7.0%, or (2) fasting glucose level < 130 mg/dL with HbA1c level ≥ 7.0% for hospitalization period. Clinical outcomes data (Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score, and visual analog scale for pain) were compared preoperatively and at the final follow-up between the two groups. Complications following TAA were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All clinical variables had improved in both groups by the final follow-up (mean follow-up = 77.8 months). There was no significant difference in any clinical variable between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). Of the 266 ankles, 73 ankles (19 in the DM group, 54 in the non-DM group) developed periprosthetic osteolysis. Although the DM group showed a higher prevalence of aseptic loosening or subsidence, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.236).

CONCLUSIONS

In the intermediate-term follow-up, TAA in patients with controlled DM showed clinical outcomes and complication rates comparable to patients without DM. Our results suggest that TAA can be done safely in diabetic patients if the DM is controlled in the perioperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

The Burden of Revision Total Ankle Replacement Has Increased From 2010 to 2020

Background

Total ankle replacement (TAR) surgery has increased in recent decades. The aim of this study was to investigate the evolving burden of revision surgery and risk factors and timing of revision or explant.

Methods

Using the 2010 to 2020 PearlDiver M151Ortho data set, this retrospective cohort study identified primary TAR, TAR revision, and TAR explant patients via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease Procedural (ICD-P) codes. This database contains billing claims information across all payers and sites of care in the United States. Patient factors investigated included age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Annual incidence for primary TAR was normalized per 100 000 covered lives in the data set for each year of study and recorded. Annual incidence of revision TAR and explant were normalized per 100 TARs performed for each year of study. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors for revision TAR or explant. For explants, the eventual intervention by 2 years was analyzed. Ten-year timing and survival to revision or explant surgery following unilateral TAR were characterized.

Results

A total of 10 531 primary, 1218 revision, and 1735 explant TARs were identified. After normalization, TAR utilization increased by 284% from 2010 to 2020, annual TAR revisions rose 28%, and annual TAR explants decreased 65%. Independent predictors of revision TAR were younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.29 per decade decrease) and higher ECI (OR 1.23 per 2-point increase). Independent predictors of explant included younger age (OR 1.80 per decade decrease), female sex (OR 1.17), and higher ECI (OR 1.35 per 2-point increase). The 10-year implant survival rate was 91.8%, of which 73% of revisions and 83% of explants occurred in the first 3 years following index TAR.

Conclusion

TAR utilization has grown substantially over the past decade, with minimal increases in the annual rate of revision surgery with respect to index procedures performed.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

[Postprimary early elective total arthroplasty in severe ankle fractures]

Treatment of the ankle joint with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an established and safe surgical treatment for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Modern implants have low revision rates and are superior to ankle arthrodesis in terms of patient-reported outcomes. The importance of primary TAA treatment of ankle fractures is unclear. There are currently no studies in the literature on this topic. In view of the increasing number of cases of unstable ankle fractures, especially in older patients and with increasing functional demands also in old age, it is important to consider TAA in the management of these fractures in the future. Clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the treatment of ankle fractures using TAA.

Does Concurrent Distal Tibiofibular Joint Arthrodesis Affect the Nonunion and Complication Rates of Tibiotalar Arthrodesis?

Tibiotalar arthrodesis successfully treats ankle arthritis but carries risk of nonunion. It is unclear whether concurrent distal tibiofibular arthrodesis affects tibiotalar nonunion rate. The purpose of this study is to compare tibiotalar nonunion and complication rates in patients with versus without a distal tibiofibular arthrodesis. This is a retrospective review of 516 consecutive ankle arthrodesis performed between March 2002 and May 2016. A total of 319 ankles (312 patients) underwent primary, open tibiotalar arthrodesis (227 with distal tibiofibular arthrodesis, 92 without). Primary outcome measure was nonunion rate. Secondary outcome measures were time to tibiotalar union, rate of development of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE), rate of deep wound complications, and rate of return to operating room (OR). No differences in nonunion rates were observed in both cohorts of patients with versus without distal tibiofibular arthrodesis: 17/227 (7.5%) versus 11/92 (12%) (p = 0.2), respectively, odds ratio was 0.74, 95% CI: 0.29~2.08 (p = 0.55). There was no difference in deep wound complications (5.3% versus 10.9%, p = 0.42), time to union (3.7 months versus 4.1 months, p = 0.72), or rate of development of DVT/PE (5.2% versus 2.2%, p = 0.18) between patients with and without distal tibiofibular arthrodesis, respectively. This is the first study directly comparing nonunion and complication rates in primary, open ankle arthrodesis with and without distal tibiofibular arthrodesis. Inclusion of the distal fibular joint with the tibiotalar fusion was not associated with a change in tibiotalar nonunion rate, time to union, wound complications, or postoperative DVT/PE.