Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Displaced Finger Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Prospective, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

The impact on time between injury and semi-acute surgery for hand fractures after virtual fracture clinic implementation

The aim of this before-and-after study was to evaluate the implementation of a virtual fracture clinic (VFC) on the time between injury and surgery in patients presenting with a phalangeal or metacarpal fracture and in need of semi-acute surgical treatment. Between 1 January and 30 September 2018 (pre-VFC) and in the same period in 2022 (VFC), 101 and 113 patients were included, respectively. Before VCF implementation, the time between injury and surgery was 8.9 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1 to 9.6), while after VCF implementation it was 7.6 days (95% CI: 7.0 to 8.3). In 2018, 7% of operations were unacceptably delayed beyond 14 days from injury, which was reduced to 5% in 2022, despite patient-presentation delays of up to 10 days. VFC implementation was associated with a reduction in time until semi-acute surgery for phalangeal or metacarpal fractures and improved the quality of semi-acute surgery planning.Level of evidence: Level III.

Conservative treatment versus transverse pinning in fifth metacarpal neck fractures in active adults: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Compare two simple ways for treating boxer's fractures in active adults; conservative management by ulnar gutter slab and transverse pinning in fixation of fifth metacarpal's neck fracture regarding union, functional outcomes, and complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety patients with fifth metacarpals' neck fractures with palmar angulation (30-70°) were managed either conservatively by an ulnar gutter slab or surgically by transverse pinning technique from January 2020 to December 2021. Only 84 patients completed a 1-year follow-up. Patients with old, open, or mal-rotated fractures were excluded. The block-randomization method was used to create equal groups. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically every 2-3 weeks until union, then at 6 and 12 months. Functional assessment at the final visit was done using the quick DASH score, total active motion (TAM), and total Active Flexion (TAF).

RESULTS

The mean radiological union time for the conservative group in this study was 7.76 weeks, while for the transverse pinning group, it was 7.38 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques regarding union rates and functional outcomes. All patients returned to their pre-injury jobs and level of activity.

CONCLUSION

Both conservative management in ulnar gutter slab and percutaneous transverse pinning are considered effective methods in the treatment of simple extra-articular fifth metacarpal neck fractures with angulation between 30 and 70 degrees (AO: 77 A3.1). The functional and radiological results using both methods were satisfactory and statistically comparable.

Surgical complications: errors and adverse events

Complications are a recognized hazard of surgery. The term is confusing; it has multiple meanings, including surgical error and adverse surgical outcomes. I propose the latter two terms are used. Grading of 'complications' is difficult but made easier by grading errors and outcomes separately, though they are not always linked. The exact grades are not established.Error avoidance requires efforts at a personal (surgeon) level, including training, learning and preparation, and at a systems level. Understanding human factors is important.The perspective of patients about adverse outcomes is not well understood. There is evidence that, unsurprisingly, patient perspectives may be different to surgeon perspectives. There are a range of surgeon responses to error and adverse outcomes; many are negative. These need to be understood better in order to protect patients and surgeons in the immediate aftermath and in the potentially prolonged 'recovery time', both for patients and surgeons.Level of evidence: V.

The Treatment of Closed Finger and Metacarpal Fractures

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the fingers and metacarpal bones are the most common fracture type in the upper limb, with an incidence of 114 to 1483 per 100 000 persons per year. The clinical importance of closed finger and metacarpal fractures is often underestimated; inadequate diagnostic and therapeutic measures may result in serious harm. This review concerns the basic elements of the diagnosis and treatment of finger and metacarpal fractures.

METHODS

This review of the incidence, diagnosis and treatment of finger and metacarpal fractures is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature.

RESULTS

The main focus of treatment lies on restoration of hand function in consideration of the requirements of the individual patient. The currently available evidence provides little guidance to optimal treatment (level II evidence). Although most closed fractures can be managed conservatively, individualized surgical treatment is advisable in comminuted fractures and fractures with a relevant degree of torsional malposition, axis deviation, or shortening, as well as in intra-articular fractures. Minimally invasive techniques are, in principle, to be performed wherever possible, yet open surgery is sometimes needed because of fracture morphology. Postsurgical complication rates are in the range of 32-36%, with joint fusion accounting for 67-76% of the complications. 15% involve delayed fracture healing and pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSION

Individualized treatment for finger and metacarpal fractures can improve patients' outcomes, with major socioeconomic and societal benefits. Further high-quality studies evaluating the relative merits of the available treatments are needed as a guide to optimized therapy.

Management of Displaced Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Affecting mainly the working population, metacarpal shaft fractures account for up to 31% of hand fractures. To manage this entity, conservative management can be equal to operative management. However, surgeons tend to favor operative management in order to reduce the rate of complications, such as shortening and malunion. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare conservative to operative management of displaced metacarpal shaft fractures.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched until August 2023. The clinical outcomes consisted of postoperative shortening, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and mean grip strength.

Results

Only three studies were included in this meta-analysis. Operative management was shown to reduce postoperative shortening (p<0.00001). However, conservative management had a better postoperative DASH score (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Better DASH scores were seen in the conservative group, but there was a higher postoperative shortening. However, studies have shown that the shortening has no effect on the functional outcome. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to confirm these findings.