Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group

Functional evaluation after cortical button fixation for distal biceps ruptures - Is there any difference between manual or non-manual workers?

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare clinical and functional results after distal biceps tendon repair in manual workers vs. non-manual workers.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study which refers to 57 cases with distal biceps tendon rupture, divided in manual workers (24 elbows) and non-manual workers (33), that were treated by a single incision with cortical button and interference screw fixation. Included cases have a minimum of 3 months follow-up, post-operative X-ray and signed informed consent for the investigation.

RESULTS

Supination and flexion strength was higher in manual workers vs. non-manual workers (p-value=0.192 and 0.878, respectively). Nine patients showed loss of range of motion, concerning supination and pronation, and this was correlated to worse functional scores. Functional scores tend to be superior in non-manual workers. Ten patients had heterotopic ossification and 20 patients reported lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve neuropraxia; one had both. Most of them had a full recovery.

CONCLUSION

According to clinical evaluation and post-operative scores, the performed surgical procedure provides good to excellent mid-term functional results. Nevertheless, there were not any differences between manual or non-manual workers.

Decreased Strength, Complication Rate and Higher Satisfaction in Conservative Treatment of Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Compared to Surgical Treatment: A Systematic Review

Background

Treatment modalities for partial distal biceps tendon (DBT) ruptures include conservative management (immobilization, medication, and physical therapy) or surgery. Selecting treatment modality can present a challenge to both patient and provider.

Hypothesis

It was hypothesized that patients undergoing surgical treatment for partial DBT rupture would have higher complications but better overall strength, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction.

Study Design

Systematic Review.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases were searched for studies published through May 2023. Studies were included if they examined patients with a partial DBT rupture who underwent treatment. Exclusion criteria were non-human studies, studies not in English, reviews, technical notes, letters to the editor, surgical technique papers, and studies reported in a prior review.

Results

13 studies consisting of 290 patients with a partial DBT tear were included in this review. 75% of the patients were male and the ages ranged from 23 - 75 years. The follow up for the patients ranged from 1 - 94 months. 55 patients underwent conservative treatment versus 256 patients underwent surgical treatment. Outcomes examined by the studies included pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), complications, patient reported outcomes (PROs), return to activity, and patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

Treatment for partial DBT tear via surgery or conservative treatment both produce good clinical outcomes. There are similar outcomes between treatment options for pain and ROM. Conservative treatment had some poorer outcomes in terms of strength after treatment. Surgical treatment had more complications and a few patients with decreased satisfaction. Overall, both are viable treatment options, requiring a physician and patient discussion regarding the pros and cons of both options as a part of a shared decision-making process that incorporates patient priorities.

Distal Biceps Repair Using an All-Suture Anchor Technique

Distal biceps ruptures are common injuries that lead to significant decrease in elbow supination strength and pain. This Technical Note describes a single-incision distal biceps tendon repair using 2 knotless suture anchors. This technique is easily reproducible, is efficient, and has the unique benefits of decreasing the risk of heterotopic ossification and damage to neurovascular structure while providing similar outcomes to other described fixation techniques.

Prevalence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after distal biceps tendon repair

Complete distal biceps tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon. Conservative treatment may result in persistent pain and weakness. Therefore, surgical repair is usually indicated in order to restore strength. Different surgical techniques and fixation methods have been described. The most reported complications after surgery are iatrogenic nerve damage, heterotopic ossification (HO) and re-rupture. Heterotopic ossification can be variable in size. Significant HO can limit range of motion while minor HO often remains asymptomatic. The overall presence of HO is likely underreported in literature, as imaging is reserved for symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon. This retrospective study assessed the prevalence and clinical relevance of postoperative HO after distal biceps tendon repair. CT-scans were used to evaluate size and location of the HO. VAS scores, DASH scores, MEPI, and range of motion (ROM) were assessed to evaluate pain, patient satisfaction and elbow function. HO was observed on CT images of 19 out of 35 patients (54%). The use of interference screws, timing of surgery after rupture and timing of radiographic assessment postoperatively did not influence the prevalence of HO. The presence of HO had no statistically significant impact on the VAS scores, ROM measurements and MEPI and DASH scores. According to our findings, the overall incidence of HO is higher than previously reported but there are no differences in clinical outcomes when compared to patients without HO.

Acute Distal Biceps Tendon Injury: Diagnosis and Treatment

Acute distal biceps injuries clinically present with sudden pain and acute loss of flexion and supination strength. The main injury mechanism occurs during the eccentric load of the biceps. The hook test is the most significant examination test, presenting the highest sensibility and specificity for this lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging, the gold standard imaging test, can provide information regarding integrity and identify partial and/or complete tears. The surgical treatment uses an anterior or double approach and several reattachment techniques. Although there is no clinical evidence to recommend one fixation method over the other, biomechanical studies show that the cortical button resists better to failure. Although surgical treatment led to an 89% rate of return to work in 14 weeks, the recovery of high sports performance occurred in 1 year, with unsustainable outcomes.

Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Delayed Distal Biceps Repairs without Graft Augmentation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Distal biceps tendon tears are responsible for 3% to 10% of all biceps ruptures. Treated nonoperatively, these injuries result in poor endurance, loss of supination strength, and loss of flexion strength compared with those treated operatively with repair or reconstruction. When presenting in a chronic fashion, operative management can involve graft reconstruction or primary repair. When there is adequate tendon excursion and quality, primary repair is preferred. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the literature regarding outcomes of direct surgical repair of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review and for the presentation of results. A search of the literature was performed on the electronic database Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Included studies evaluated subjective and objective outcomes after delayed treatment (≥4 weeks postinjury) for chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures, without use of graft augmentation. Subjective and objective outcome metrics such as functional scores, range of motion, strength, pain level, and return to employment were collected.

RESULTS

Eight studies were reviewed. The studies included 124 patients with chronic distal biceps tendon tears, treated surgically after a mean delay to surgery of 121.8 days. Four studies included comparison of patients with acute and chronic tears, whereas the other 4 studies assessed chronic tears only. The findings of these 4 studies suggest that direct repair of chronic tears is correlated with a mildly higher rate of lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) injury palsy (10/82 [12.1%] chronic vs. 3/38 [7.9%] acute, p = 0.753); however, this complication was overwhelmingly transient. There were only 3 reported reruptures (3.19%) across 5 studies reporting this complication. Overall, patients who had undergone direct repair of chronic distal biceps tears had good patient satisfaction, outcomes, and range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Direct repair of chronic distal biceps tendon tears without the use of graft reconstruction is associated with acceptable patient satisfaction, range of motion, and functional outcome scores, although transient LABCN palsy rates may be slightly higher. When sufficient residual tendon is present in the setting of chronic distal biceps rupture, direct repair is a viable treatment option. However, the existing literature regarding direct repair of chronic distal biceps repair is limited, and further prospective assessment directly comparing primary repair vs. reconstruction of chronic distal biceps ruptures is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of a Novel Cortical Button System for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Retrospective Study

Background There are a number of different techniques available for the repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Recent evidence has revealed satisfactory clinical outcomes for suture button techniques. Aims The aim of this study was to determine if the ToggleLoc^TM soft tissue fixation device (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana) confers satisfactory clinical outcomes in the surgical management of distal biceps ruptures. Methods Twelve consecutive patients underwent distal biceps repair using the ToggleLoc^TM soft tissue fixation device over a two-year period. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were collected by means of validated questionnaires on two occasions. Symptoms and function were quantified using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Patient-reported health scores were determined using the EQ-5D-3L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version) questionnaire. Results The mean initial follow-up time was 10.4 months and the mean final follow-up time was 34.6 months. The mean DASH score at the initial follow-up was 5.9 (se = 3.6), compared to 2.9 (se = 1.0) at the final follow-up (p = 0.30). The mean OES at the initial follow-up was 91.5 (se = 4.1); and 91.5 (se = 5.2) at the final follow-up (p = 0.23). The mean EQ-5D-3L level sum score at the initial follow-up was 5.3 (se = 0.3); and 5.8 (se = 0.5) at the final follow-up (p = 0.34). Discussion The ToggleLoc^TM soft tissue fixation device confers satisfactory clinical outcomes, as determined by PROMS, in the surgical management of distal biceps ruptures.

Reconstruction of chronic distal biceps ruptures by dermal matrix

OBJECTIVES

Distal biceps tear is uncommon, with well-recognized risk factors and typical clinical presentation. Delays in surgical treatment lead to several challenges, such as tendon retraction and tendon degeneration. We present a surgical technique using a sterilized acellular dermal matrix, which provides a solution for a challenging pathology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We present a detailed surgical technique of distal biceps reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix, performed in 4 patients, with an average time to diagnosis of 36 days (range, 28-45 days). Demographics, clinical data, range of motion and subjective satisfaction were collected.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 18 months, all 4 patients showed full range of motion and strength, complete recovery and previous work resumed without pain. No complications appeared during this time.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed distal biceps tear reconstruction by acellular dermal matrix showed promising results. Meticulous surgical technique using this matrix provided excellent reconstruction, with very solid anatomical repair and exceptionally good fixation, good clinical outcome and satisfied patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anatomy of the biceps brachii osseous footprint: study of 100 radii and literature review

Biceps brachii (BB) tendon rupture is frequent in young males and may require surgical repair. Non-anatomic reinsertion leads to loss of strength in supination. The main aim of the present study was to describe the anatomy of the osseous footprint of the distal BB tendon. The dimensions of the footprint of the distal BB insertion were analyzed in 100 dry cadaver radii, using MicroScribe 3D software. Insertion area, assimilated to an ellipse, was calculated from 4 points (medial, lateral, cranial and caudal) determining the two axes of the ellipse. Mean footprint length, width and area were 18 mm (range, 7-24 mm), 9 mm (range, 4-15 mm), and 129 mm² (range, 46-266 mm²), respectively. Intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were satisfactory: κ = 0.75 and κ = 0.7, respectively. The present study reported BB footprint dimensions in 100 radii, providing a basis to guide surgical treatment of distal BB tendon rupture. Non-anatomical restoration of the BB tendon footprint leads to poorer clinical and biomechanical results; precise knowledge of the footprint is necessary for anatomical repair.

Bicortical suspensory button fixation yields greater ultimate load to failure over unicortical all-suture anchor fixation in distal biceps brachii tendon repair

BACKGROUND

Various distal biceps tendon repair techniques exist, each with their own biomechanical profile. Recently, all-suture anchor fixation has recently become an intriguing option for distal biceps fixation, compared with the proven track record of the suspensory cortical button. In addition, intramedullary techniques have been utilized as a means to avoid complications such as nerve damage seen with extramedullary fixation.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to perform a comparative biomechanical analysis of 4 unique distal biceps tendon fixation methods: Unicortical/intramedullary all-suture anchor fixation (UIAS), Bicortical/extramedullary all-suture anchor fixation (BEAS), Unicortical/intramedullary suspensory button fixation (UISB), and Bicortical/extramedullary suspensory button fixation (BESB).

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled Laboratory study.

METHODS

24 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were randomized into 4 groups providing data from 6 specimens, with each group undergoing a different repair technique. The specimens underwent 2 studies: Cyclic loading and Ultimate Load to failure (ULTF) testing. The repaired elbows were cycled 3000 times between 0 and 90 degrees of flexion, with displacement under cyclic loading at the repair site measured using a differential variable reductance transducer. ULTF test was performed with the elbow flexed at 90 degrees. The modes of failure were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean cyclic displacements between the 4 groups were as follows: UIAS: 1.45 ± 1.04 mm; BEAS: 2.75 ± 1.32 mm; UISB: 1.45 ± .776 mm; BESB: 2.66 ± 1.18 mm (p= 0.077). Bicortical repairs displayed greater displacement after cyclic loading when compared with unicortical repairs regardless of anchor used (p= 0.007). The mean ULTF for each group was as follows: all-suture intramedullary: 200 N; all-suture extramedullary: 330 N; cortical-button intramedullary: 256 N; cortical-button extramedullary: 342 N). All-suture unicortical/intramedullary repair had a significantly lower ULTF (200 N) compared with cortical-button Bicortical/extramedullary repair (342 N) (p=0.043).

CONCLUSION

Bicortical/extramedullary suspensory button fixation demonstrated a greater ultimate load to failure when compared with unicortical/intramedullary all-suture anchor fixation. These findings suggest that bicortical/extramedullary suspensory cortical button fixation is a biomechanically superior construct as compared to unicortical/intramedullary all-suture anchor fixation. However, there was no significant difference in ULTF between extra-medullary, Bicortical button or Bicortical, all-suture anchor fixation.

Results of single-incision distal biceps tendon repair for early-career upper-extremity surgeons

Background

The purpose of this investigation was to assess surgical outcomes after distal biceps tendon (DBT) repair for upper-extremity surgeons at the beginning of their careers, immediately following fellowship training. We aimed to determine if procedure times, complication rates, and clinical outcomes differed during the learning curve period for these early-career surgeons.

Methods

All cases of DBT repairs performed by 2 fellowship-trained surgeons from the start of their careers were included. Demographic data as well as operative times, complication rates, and patient reported outcomes were retrospectively collected. A cumulative sum chart (CUSUM) analysis was performed for the learning curve for both operative times and complication rate. This analysis continuously compares performance of an outcome to a predefined target level.

Results

A total of 78 DBT repairs performed by the two surgeons were included. In the CUSUM analysis of operative time for surgeon 1 and 2, both demonstrated a learning curve until case 4. In CUSUM analysis for complication rates, neither surgeon 1 nor surgeon 2 performed significantly worse than the target value and learning curve ranged from 14 to 21 cases. Mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (QuickDASH) (10.65 ± 5.81) and the pain visual analog scale scores (1.13 ± 2.04) were comparable to previously reported literature.

Conclusions

These data suggest that a learning curve between 4 and 20 cases exists with respect to operative times and complication rates for DBT repairs for fellowship-trained upper-extremity surgeons at the start of clinical practice. Early-career surgeons appear to have acceptable clinical results and complications relative to previously published series irrespective of their learning stage.

Treatment of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures - A survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society surgical membership

Background

Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures result in weakness and deformity. While in other jurisdictions the rate of surgical repair has outpaced rises in incidence, UK practice for distal biceps tendon ruptures is unknown. The aim of this survey was to characterise current UK clinical practice.

Methods

An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions covered respondent demographics, clinical decision making, surgical experience and willingness to be involved in future research.

Results

A total of 242 surgeons responded; 99% undertook acute distal biceps tendon repairs with 83% repairing at least half of all distal biceps tendon ruptures, and 84% of surgeons would have their own, hypothetical, acute distal biceps tendon rupture repaired in their dominant arm and 67% for their non-dominant arm. Patient age, occupation and restoration of strength were the commonest factors underpinning a recommendation of surgical fixation. Most surgeons (87%) supported a national trial to study operative and non-operative treatments.

Conclusions

UK upper limb surgeons currently advise surgical repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures for the majority of their patients. This is despite a paucity of evidence to support improved outcomes following surgical, rather than non-operative, management. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation in this area.

Single Incision Modified Tension Slide Technique in Distal Biceps Repair: Improved Load to Failure While Reducing Surgical Pitfalls

Historically, distal biceps tendon repair through the tension slide technique (TST) using a cortical button has yielded the strongest published repair measured by observed gap formation in both cyclic and maximal load to failure. The modified tension slide technique (MTST) was developed in order to provide the surgeon with a technically simpler and biomechanically more effective way to reduce gap formation and consistently seat/bottom-out the tendon within the bone tunnel through a more direct line of pull. In order to compare the biomechanics of the MTST to the TST, we used 24 matched bovine extensor tendons, and conducted maximal load to failure and cyclical load to failure testing using an Instron 5566 machine. The mean maximal load to failure for the MTST was 444 N versus 229 N for the TST ( P <0.004) while no gap formation was observed in either group after cyclic load testing. These findings indicate that the MTST has a statistically significant increased load to gap formation of ∼2-fold in comparison to TST. In the MTST both limbs of suture are passed back through the tendon, before button implantation, eliminating the "operating in a hole" effect required in the TST, and making for a simpler surgical procedure.

Outcomes and complications after different surgical techniques for the treatment of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis

Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature evaluating surgical outcomes after chronic distal biceps tendon rupture. Surgical techniques, including primary repair, autograft reconstruction, and allograft reconstruction, were compared, as well as subjective and objective clinical outcomes and complication rates.

Methods

A systematic literature search of Level I-IV studies reporting outcomes of surgically treated chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures were performed via PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Twenty-two papers were identified in the review, with 236 patients. A Modified Coleman Methodological Score (CMS) was determined for every article to assess study quality. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative range of motion, flexion and supination strength, and postoperative complications were recorded. MAYO elbow scores (MEPS) were reported more consistently than the other outcome tools.

Results

No Level I or level II studies were identified in our search, and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. Studies demonstrated mean MEPS scores ranging between 86 and 100, regardless of the surgical technique utilized. All studies reported a mean flexion-extension arc equal to or greater than 5-130°. The reported mean postoperative flexion strength was within 10% of the unaffected contralateral side. The most common complication for both direct repair and reconstruction groups was paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve [direct repair: 18-16.8%; reconstruction: 8-6.2% (allograft: 4-6%; autograft: 4-7%)]. Rerupture was uncommon and occurred in three patients who had undergone direct repair and in one patient after autograft reconstruction.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment of chronic distal biceps injuries yields favorable objective and subjective outcomes. Currently, available evidence suggests that direct repair, autograft reconstruction, or allograft reconstruction are all viable treatment options with similar outcomes.

Distal biceps tendon repairs and reconstructions-an analysis of demographics, prodromal symptoms and complications

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographics, complications and prodromal symptoms (any pain or unpleasant sensation in the area distal biceps tendon preceding the injury) of distal biceps tendon tears (DBTTs) of patients treated with primary repair or Achilles allograft reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

228 consecutive DBTTs in 226 patients from a single centre were evaluated. The demographic data, prodromal symptoms and postoperative adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

There were 225 males and 1 female patient. The age distribution showed a bimodal pattern in the whole cohort, but once the 48 (20%) elite athletes were excluded, the age was normally distributed, peaking in the 5^th decade. Direct repairs were performed in 184 cases and reconstruction with Achilles tendon allograft in 45 cases. An adverse event was observed in 34 (19%) patients who underwent direct repair and in 3 (7%) cases with graft reconstruction, corresponding to RR of 0.32 (95% CI 0.1-0.96, p = 0.04). Adjusting with the potential confounders (age, occupation and smoking), the OR was 0.35; 95% CI 0.09-1.3, p = 0.11). Adverse events included 28 (12.3% of all adverse events) lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) neurapraxias, 5 (2.1%) other neurapraxias, 6 (2.6%) heterotopic ossifications and 1 (0.4%) re-rupture. Twenty-three (10%) patients reported prodromal symptoms before the tear.

CONCLUSIONS

DBTT is a condition that affects men predominantly. The observed bimodal incidence distribution was related to elite athletes, but in the normal population the peak occurs at the age typical to tendinopathies. LABCN neurapraxia was the most common adverse event, and graft use does not seem to predispose to adverse events.

Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Ruptures of the distal biceps tendon are most commonly due to traumatic eccentric loading in the middle-aged male population and can result in functional deficits. Although surgical repair has been demonstrated to result in excellent outcomes, there are few comparative studies that show clear functional benefits over nonoperative management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the functional outcomes of operative and nonoperative management for these injuries. We hypothesized that operative treatment would be associated with significantly superior outcomes.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials), Embase, and Web of Science databases. Outcomes of interest included range of motion (ROM), strength, endurance, and patient-reported outcomes including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores. Summary effect estimates of the mean difference between operative and nonoperative management for each outcome were estimated in mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Of an initially identified 6478 studies, 62 reported outcomes for a total of 2481 cases (2402 operative, 79 nonoperative), with an overall average age of 47.4 years (47.3 for operative, 50.3 for nonoperative). There were 2273 (98.5%) males and 35 (1.5%) females among operative cases, whereas all 79 (100%) nonoperative cases were males. Operative management was associated with a significantly higher flexion strength (mean difference, 25.67%; P < .0001), supination strength (mean difference, 27.56%; P < .0001), flexion endurance (mean difference, 11.12%; P = .0268), and supination endurance (mean difference, 33.86%; P < .0001). Patient-reported DASH and MEPS were also significantly superior in patients who underwent surgical repair, with mean differences of -7.81 (P < .0001) and 7.41 (P = .0224), respectively. Comparative analyses for ROM and pain VAS were not performed because of limited reporting in the literature for nonoperative management.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional and clinical outcomes following operative and nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Operative treatment resulted in superior elbow and forearm strength and endurance, as well as superior DASH and MEPS.

Return to Play After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Distal biceps tendon ruptures (DBTR) are uncommon injuries in 40- to 50-year-old men but occur at a younger age in the athlete population. The distal biceps tendon is an important supinator of the forearm and flexor of the elbow. A complete injury results in limiting function in the upper extremity. The current review evaluates the different options in management and the current literature on return to play in athletes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The distal biceps tendon inserts on the posterior aspect of the radial tuberosity as two independent heads. The long head footprint is more proximal and posterior giving it a better lever arm for supination. The short head footprint is more distal and anterior giving it a better lever arm for flexion. Surgical anatomic repair is highly recommended among the athlete population, to restore proper function of the upper extremity. There is scarce literature on return to play among athletes. The most recent studies on high-performance athletes are on National Football League (NFL) players. These studies showed that 84-94% of NFL players returned to play at least one game after distal biceps repair. Compared to matched control groups, there was no difference in the player's performance after surgery. Anatomic repair of DBTR results in excellent outcomes, high return to work, and high rate of return to play among athletes. When compared to matched control groups, NFL players have the performance score and play the same number of games after surgery.

Intramedullary Unicortical Button and All-Suture Anchors Provide Similar Maximum Strength for Onlay Distal Biceps Tendon Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical profile of onlay distal biceps repair with an intramedullary unicortical button versus all-suture anchors under cyclic loading and maximal load to failure.

METHODS

Twenty paired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were randomized to onlay distal biceps repair with either a single intramedullary button or with two 1.35-mm all-suture anchors. A 1.3-mm high tensile strength tape was used in a Krackow stitch to suture the tendons in both groups. Specimens and repair constructs were loaded for 3,000 cycles and then loaded to failure. Maximum load to failure, mode of failure, and construct elongation were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean (± standard deviation) maximum load to failure for the unicortical intramedullary button and all-suture anchor repairs were 503.23 ± 141.77 N and 537.33 ± 262.13 N (P = .696), respectively. Mean maximum displacement after 3,000 cycles (± standard deviation) was 4.17 ± 2.05 mm in the button group and 2.06 ± 1.05 mm in the suture anchor group (P = .014). Mode of failure in the button group was suture tape rupture in 7 specimens, failure at the tendon-suture interface in 2 specimens, and button pullout in 1 specimen. Anchor pullout was the mode of failure in all suture anchor specimens. There were no tendon ruptures or radial tuberosity fractures in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that onlay distal biceps repair with 2 all-suture anchors has similar maximum strength to repair with an intramedullary button and that both are viable options for fixation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

All-suture anchors and unicortical intramedullary button have similar maximum strength at time zero. Both constructs provide suitable fixation for onlay distal biceps repair.

Distal biceps tendon repair: cost analysis of single- versus double-incision techniques in an ambulatory surgery center

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the cost differences for single- versus double-incision distal biceps repair at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) given that similar clinical outcomes have been reported between these methods.

Methods

A retrospective review of financial and medical records was completed for patients who underwent distal biceps tendon repair over a three-year period at a single private orthopedic practice. Variables analyzed include the cost to the ASC of operative time and the cost of differential surgical supplies, specifically implants and disposable supplies.

Results

A total of 10 surgeons performed 104 repairs. Nine surgeons performed repairs through a single incision with use of cortical button or suture anchor fixation, and one surgeon performed transosseous suture fixation through a double-incision approach. The median tourniquet time and procedure length were 31 (interquartile range [IQR] 27-40) and 44 (IQR 39-54) minutes for single-incision repairs and 68 minutes (IQR 61-75) and 110 minutes (IQR 103-113) for double-incision repairs which were significantly different across groups (P < .001, P < .001). The total surgical cost (operative time, implants, and disposables) for single-incision repairs was a median of $758 (IQR 732-803) compared with $606 (IQR 567-629) for double-incision repairs (P < .001). However, the procedure cost with implants (not including disposables) was not significantly different for single- (median [Mdn] = $500 [IQR 475-552]) and double-incision repairs (Mdn $552 [IQR 514-564]) (P = .14) although the procedure cost with disposables (not including implant costs) favored single-incision repairs (Mdn = $478 [IQR 452-523]) over double-incision repairs (Mdn = $606 [IQR 567-629]) (P < .001).

Conclusion

In a single surgery center, single-incision distal biceps repairs utilizing an implant were performed more expeditiously than double-incision repairs with a transosseous technique but incurred greater surgical costs. Differences in surgical time cost between the two approaches could be consequential for ASCs and other stakeholders.

The Turtle Neck Sign: Identification of Severe Retracted Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture

Background:

Chronic tendon retraction subsequent to distal biceps tendon rupture significantly increases repair difficulty and potential for tendon grafting. Biceps tendons that appear short or absent with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or that cannot be readily identified at surgery may erroneously be classified as irreparable. These apparent “absent” biceps tendons may actually be retracted and curled up inside the muscle, visually resembling the head-neck of a turtle retracted inside its shell (the “turtle neck sign”). When located, these tendons could be unfolded and repaired primarily. This type of tendon retraction seems to be associated with high-degree ruptures and larcertus fibrosus tears.

Purpose:

To test the hypothesis that tendon retractions with a turtle neck sign on MRI are more associated with high-degree ruptures and larcertus fibrosus tears versus tendon tears with simple linear retraction.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Retracted distal biceps tendon ruptures on sagittal MRI were categorized as linear retraction or curled-up (turtle neck) retraction. Retraction length, injury severity, and lacertus fibrosus tears were analyzed.

Results:

The authors retrospectively analyzed the patient records of 85 consecutive traumatic distal biceps tendon ruptures from 2003 to 2019; the final study cohort was 37 patients. Injury-to-surgery timing was as follows: <3 weeks, 43% (16 cases); 3 weeks to 3 months, 32% (12 cases); and >3 months, 24% (9 cases). Overall, 19 patients had linear retraction <7 cm (mean, 3.3 ± 1.9 cm) and 18 patients had a turtle neck retraction ≥7 cm (mean, 9.1 ± 1.6 cm). The injury-to-surgery time (median [± interquartile range]) was 27 days (±90 days) in the linear retraction group and 23 days (±65 days) in the turtle neck retraction group. The turtle neck retraction group had a significantly higher occurrence of abnormal hook test findings, complete distal biceps tendon rupture, and lacertus fibrosus tears compared with the linear retraction group (100% vs 58%, 100% vs 68%, and 100% vs 37%, respectively; P ≤ .02). However, significant repairability differences were not found.

Conclusion:

Highly retracted distal biceps turtle neck sign tendon ruptures occur frequently in association with high-degree ruptures and lacertus fibrosus tears. The presence of a turtle neck retraction did not affect reparability. Surgeons should be aware of this curled-up retraction to avoid mistaking it for an absent tendon or a muscle-tendon disruption.

Determining the incidence and risk factors for short-term complications following distal biceps tendon repair

Background

Distal biceps rupture is a relatively uncommon injury that can significantly affect quality of life. Early complications following biceps tendon repair are not well described in the literature. This study utilizes a national surgical database to determine the incidence of and predictors for short-term complications following distal biceps tendon repair.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing distal biceps repair between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Patient demographic variables of sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, functional status, and several comorbidities were collected for each patient, along with 30-day postoperative complications. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate risk ratios for these complications using patient predictor variables.

Results

Early postoperative surgical complications (0.5%)—which were mostly infections (0.4%)—and medical complications (0.3%) were rare. A readmission risk factor was diabetes (risk ratio [RR], 4.238; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.180–15.218). Non-home discharge risk factors were smoking (RR, 3.006; 95% CI, 1.123–8.044) and ≥60 years of age (RR, 4.150; 95% CI, 1.611– 10.686). Maleness was protective for medical complications (RR, 0.024; 95% CI, 0.005–0.126). Surgical complication risk factors were obese class II (RR, 4.120; 95% CI, 1.123–15.120), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; RR, 21.981; 95% CI, 3.719–129.924), and inpatient surgery (RR, 8.606; 95% CI, 2.266–32.689).

Conclusions

Complication rates after distal biceps repair are low. Various patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors were all predictive of short-term complications.

Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Videos on YouTube: An Analysis of Video Content and Quality

Purpose

Our purpose was to analyze the content and quality of YouTube videos related to distal biceps tendon (DBT) ruptures and repair. We aimed to compare differences between academic and nonacademic video sources.

Methods

The most popular YouTube videos related to DBT injuries were compiled and analyzed according to source. Viewing characteristics were determined for each video. Video content and quality were assessed by 2 reviewers and analyzed according to the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, DISCERN criteria, and a Distal Biceps Content Score. Cohen’s kappa was used to measure interrater reliability.

Results

A total of 59 DBT YouTube videos were included. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from moderate to excellent for the content scores. The mean DISCERN score was 29, and no videos were rated as either “good” or “excellent” for content quality. With the exception of the mean Journal of the American Medical Association criteria score (1.5 vs 0.5), videos from academic sources did not demonstrate significantly higher levels of content quality. Only 4/59 videos (7%) discussed the natural history of nonsurgically treated DBT ruptures. Of the 32 videos that discussed surgical techniques, only 3/32 (9%) had a preference for 2-incision techniques. No videos discussed the association between spontaneous DBT ruptures and cardiac amyloidosis.

Conclusions

The overall content, quality, and reliability of DBT videos on YouTube are poor. Videos from academic sources do not provide higher-quality information than videos from nonacademic sources. Videos related to operative treatment of DBT ruptures more frequently discuss single-incision techniques.

Clinical relevance

Social media videos can function as direct-to-consumer marketing materials, and surgeons should be prepared to address misconceptions regarding the management of DBT tears. Patients are increasingly seeking health information online, and surgeons should direct patients toward more reliable and vetted sources of information.

Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button

Purpose

To evaluate the possibility of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury during cortical button deployment and seating associated with bicortical drilling and passage of the cortical button across the distal cortex when repairing a distal biceps rupture in a cadaveric model.

Methods

Each cadaver was placed in the supine position with the arm extended. A single 4 cm transverse incision was made in the region of the radial tuberosity, 3–4 cm distal to the antecubital fossa flexion crease, and dissected down to the radial tuberosity. A #2 looped nonabsorbable suture was used to baseball stitch the musculotendinous junction to the distal 2.5 cm end of the tendon. A 3.2 mm cannulated drill bit (Arthrex) was used to create a bicortical drill hole in the center of the radial tuberosity aiming 30° ulnar to maximize the distance from the PIN. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm drill placement in the radial tuberosity for all specimens. The posterior aspect of the elbow in all cadavers was subsequently dissected out to directly visualize how far the cannulated drill was from the PIN.

Results

Twelve cadavers, average age 57.4 years (range, 27–83 years), were dissected. During deployment, the cortical button contacted the PIN directly in 6 extremities. The cortical button came within 6 mm of the PIN in eleven extremities. In 8 specimens, the cortical button was within 2 mm of the PIN. The PIN was caught directly under the cortical button in one specimen.

Conclusions

Placement of a biceps cortical button bicortically when repairing a distal biceps tendon may increase the risk of injury to the PIN during cortical button deployment and seating.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Current Controversies and Decision-Making in the Management of Biceps Pathologies

»

Biceps tendon pathologies include a spectrum of injuries that range from mild tendinosis to complete tendon rupture.

»

Tendinosis, the most common pathology, occurs more frequently with age and is likely related to chronic degeneration. On the other side of the spectrum of severity lies a rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), which may be accompanied by injury to the glenoid labrum.

»

Superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears are frequently associated with biceps pathology. Surgical management for injuries of the bicipital-labral complex includes biceps tenodesis or tenotomy and SLAP repair. A consensus as to which of these procedures is the optimal choice has not been reached, and management may ultimately depend on patient-specific characteristics.

»

Due to the relatively low incidence of distal biceps tendon rupture, agreement on the optimal management strategy has not been reached. Surgical repair, or reconstruction in the case of a chronic rupture, is often chosen. However, nonoperative management has also been utilized in older, less-active patients.

Distal biceps tendon rupture: Is surgery the best course of treatment? Two case reports

STUDY DESIGN

Repeated case study.

INTRODUCTION

Complete rupture of the distal biceps tendon occurs mostly within the middle-aged male population. Surgical repair is traditionally recommended. Given the potential for complications, questions remain whether surgical repair is indicated.

PURPOSE

To explore non-operative management for full distal biceps tendon ruptures.

CASES

Two participants with complete tears of the distal biceps tendon confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound had chosen to not undergo surgical repair. First, a 48-year-old police officer was an avid weight lifter and recreational athlete. Second, a 43-year-old detailer has minimal physical activity participation other than work duties and light recreational sports. Strength testing was performed immediately after rupture and at 24 weeks after a structured physical therapy program focused on strengthening and stretching the elbow flexors and supinator.

OUTCOMES

Initial strength deficits of 17/21% in flexion and 13/19% for supination were detected. In both patients, flexion and supination strength returned to normal limits when compared with the opposite upper extremity. After intervention, functional and disability scores were normal in both cases, and both patients reported return to preinjury repetitive work and weight training.

DISCUSSION

Although patients are typically counseled that a reason for surgical repair after biceps rupture is substantial loss of flexion and supination strength, these cases indicate that full recovery of strength and function is possible through rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

These cases question the traditional wisdom that a surgical repair is needed for all distal biceps ruptures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 5. ICD-10 Code: M66.3.

Acute complete and partial distal biceps tendon ruptures: what have we learned? A review

Acute distal biceps tendon (DBT) pathology includes bicipitoradial bursitis, tendinosis, partial and complete tears.

Diagnosis of complete DBT tears is mainly clinical, whereas in partial tears medical imaging is a valuable addition to the clinical diagnosis.

New insights in clinical and medical imaging of partial tears may reduce time to diagnosis and may guide the treatment plan.

Most complete tears are best treated with primary repair using either a single-incision or double-incision approach with good clinical outcome.

The double-incision technique has a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, whereas a single-incision technique carries a higher risk of nerve-related complications.

Intramedullary fixation may be a viable solution to negate the risk of posterior interosseus nerve lesions in single-incision repairs.

DBT endoscopy can be used to treat low-grade partial tears and tendinosis.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:956-965. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200145

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management for Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both nonoperative and operative treatments have been proposed to manage distal biceps brachii tendon avulsions. However, the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches have not been properly quantified.

PURPOSE

To summarize the current literature on both nonoperative and operative approaches for distal biceps brachii tendon ruptures and to quantify results and limitations. The advantages and disadvantages of the different surgical strategies were investigated as well.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in March 2020 using PubMed Central, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Iscrctn.com, clinicaltrials.gov, greylit.org, opengrey.eu, and Scopus literature databases. All human studies evaluating the clinical outcome of nonoperative treatment as well as different surgical techniques were included. The influence of the treatment approach was assessed in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index; extension, flexion, supination, and pronation range of motion (ROM); and flexion and supination strength ratio between the injured and uninjured arms. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 1275 studies, 53 studies (N = 1380 patients) matched the inclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analysis comparing operative versus nonoperative approaches for distal biceps tendon avulsion showed significant differences in favor of surgery in terms of DASH score (P = .02), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (P < .001), flexion strength (94.7% vs 83.0%, respectively; P < .001), and supination strength (89.2% vs 62.6%, respectively; P < .001). The surgical approach presented 10% heterotopic ossifications, 10% transient sensory nerve injuries, 1.6% transient motor nerve injuries, and a 0.1% rate of persistent motorial disorders. Comparison of the different surgical techniques showed similar results for the fixation methods, whereas the single-incision technique led to a better pronation ROM versus the double-incision approach (81.5° vs 76.1°, respectively; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis showed the superiority of surgical management over the nonoperative approach for distal biceps tendon detachment, with superior flexion and supination strength and better patient-reported outcomes. The single-incision surgical approach demonstrated a slightly better pronation ROM compared with the double-incision approach, whereas all fixation methods led to similar outcomes.

Differences in risk factors exist for the occurrence of bilateral versus unilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Distal biceps rupture is a debilitating injury that is increasing in incidence. A subset of patient experiences this injury on both sides, simultaneously or at separated times. Previous studies have evaluated the incidence and risk factors of unilateral distal biceps rupture. However, little is known about the risk factors for bilateral distal biceps rupture.

AIMS

This aims of this study were to determine risk factors for bilateral distal biceps rupture and to compare these to the known risk factors for unilateral rupture.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic review of literature was conducted using five databases, producing a total of 1183 papers. After the review process, 31 papers with data bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures were included.

FINDINGS

The 31 papers included a total of 2234 patients with 2366 ruptures. Patients with a bilateral rupture were younger than patients with unilateral ruptures (45.8 vs 48.8 years old). Women made up a larger percentage of patients with bilateral ruptures (6.8% vs 4.0%). Bilateral injuries occurred most commonly during heavy lifting or falls, whereas forced extension of the arm was the most frequently reported injury mechanism reported with unilateral ruptures. Tobacco used was more common in patients with bilateral ruptures (24.4% vs 6.8%). Labour-intensive occupations and anabolic steroid use did not appear to increase the risk of a bilateral rupture. Pooling of the data was not possible due to heterogeneity of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

While differences in risk factors between patients with unilateral and bilateral ruptures were observed, there was too great of a degree of heterogeneity among the studies to perform a meta-analysis of the data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review; level III evidence.

Acute distal biceps tendon repair using cortical button fixation results in excellent short- and long-term outcomes : a single-centre experience of 102 patients

AIMS

Acute distal biceps tendon repair reduces fatigue-related pain and minimizes loss of supination of the forearm and strength of flexion of the elbow. We report the short- and long-term outcome following repair using fixation with a cortical button techqniue.

METHODS

Between October 2010 and July 2018, 102 patients with a mean age of 43 years (19 to 67), including 101 males, underwent distal biceps tendon repair less than six weeks after the injury, using cortical button fixation. The primary short-term outcome measure was the rate of complications. The primary long-term outcome measure was the abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), EuroQol five-dimension three-level score (EQ-5D-3L), satisfaction, and return to function.

RESULTS

Eight patients (7.8%) had a major complication and 34 (33.3%) had a minor complication. Major complications included re-rupture (n = 3; 2.9%), unrecovered nerve injury (n = 4; 3.9%), and surgery for heterotopic ossification (n = 1; 1.0%). Three patients (2.9%) overall required further surgery for a complication. Minor complications included neurapraxia (n = 27; 26.5%) and superficial infection (n = 7; 6.9%). A total of 33 nerve injuries occurred in 31 patients (30.4%). At a mean follow-up of five years (1 to 9.8) outcomes were available for 86 patients (84.3%). The median QuickDASH, OES, EQ-5D-3L, and satisfaction scores were 1.2 (IQR 0 to 5.1), 48 (IQR 46 to 48), 0.80 (IQR 0.72 to 1.0), and 100/100 (IQR 90 to 100), respectively. Most patients were able to return to work (81/83, 97.6%) and sport (51/62,82.3%). Unrecovered nerve injury was associated with an inferior outcome according to the QuickDASH (p = 0.005), OES (p = 0.004), EQ-5D-3L (p = 0.010), and satisfaction (p = 0.024). Multiple linear regression analysis identified an unrecovered nerve injury to be strongly associated with an inferior outcome according to the QuickDASH score (p < 0.001), along with infection (p < 0.001), although re-rupture (p = 0.440) and further surgery (p = 0.652) were not.

CONCLUSION

Acute distal biceps tendon repair using cortical button fixation was found to result in excellent patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life. Although rare, unrecovered nerve injury adversely affects outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1284-1291.

Distal Biceps Tendon Tears: Diagnosis and Treatment Algorithm

»

Distal biceps tendon (DBT) tears occur most commonly in middle-aged men after a sudden, forced eccentric contraction of the flexed elbow.

»

An understanding of the multiple risk factors, mechanisms, and pathophysiological causes is essential for proper and timely diagnosis.

»

High clinical suspicion and routine physical examination with appropriate special examination tests, including the hook test, the passive forearm pronation test, the biceps crease interval test, and the bicipital aponeurosis flex test, can help with rapid and accurate diagnosis and guide appropriate and timely management.

»

Treatment for DBT tears depends on the extent (complete versus incomplete) and timing (acute versus chronic) of the injury, and options include nonoperative management, repair, and reconstruction with or without repair of the bicipital aponeurosis.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Ruptures in a Consecutive Case Series

Background:

Patients with ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon (DBBT) have traditionally been treated via surgical repair, despite limited patient data on nonoperative management.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To determine the clinical and functional outcomes for patients with partial and complete DBBT injuries treated nonoperatively or surgically through an anatomic single-incision technique. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes in patients treated with nonoperative or operative management.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review identified all patients with a partial or complete DBBT injury sustained between 2003 and 2017. Surgically treated patients underwent DBBT repair using an anatomic single-incision technique. Nonoperative management consisted of formal physical therapy. The following clinical outcome measures were included for analysis: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) upper extremity patient questionnaire; the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score; and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

Results:

A total of 60 patients (mean ± SD age, 47.8 ± 11.5 years; range, 18-70 years) sustained DBBT ruptures (38 complete and 22 partial) during the study period. Of patients with complete DBBT, 34 were treated operatively and 4 nonoperatively; of those with partial DBBT, 11 were treated operatively and 11 nonoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 4.0 years (range, 0.5-16.6 years), patients with complete DBBT ruptures achieved overall similar improvements with respect to mean ASES pain, ASES function, SANE, and DASH scores, regardless of whether they were treated operatively or nonoperatively. Subjective satisfaction and functional scores were comparable between the groups. Similarly, at a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 3.8 years (range, 0.5-11.3 years), patients with partial DBBT injuries had improved mean ASES pain, ASES function, SANE, and DASH scores, regardless of operative or nonoperative treatment. Subjective satisfaction and functional scores were comparable between these groups. For those treated surgically, 5 patients (11.1%) sustained a surgical postoperative complication.

Conclusion:

In our case series, patients were able to achieve satisfactory outcomes regardless of whether they were treated nonoperatively or with an anatomic single-incision approach for complete or partial DBBT ruptures.

Distal biceps rupture: Evaluation and management

Injury to the distal biceps occurs in certain high risk groups. Anatomical continuity of the lacertus fibrosus has bearing on the extent of retraction of the torn tendon stump. The objective of clinical and imaging evaluation is to discriminate between tendinosis, partial tear, acute complete tear and chronic complete tear. A complete tear of the distal biceps tendon can be diagnosed clinically with the Hook test. The traditional Hook test and the resisted Hook test are useful clinical tests. Though x-rays are routinely done, MRI remains the investigation of choice. Non-operative treatment has a role in selected patients with partial tear or patients with complete tear who have low functional demands. Operative treatment is the recommended treatment for complete tear of the distal biceps and is associated with good functional outcome and patient satisfaction.

Mini-Open Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using All-Suture Anchors

Distal biceps tendon ruptures are uncommon injuries that can cause impairment in range of motion and function. While distal bicep tendon repair to the radial tuberosity has been demonstrated to restore function and strength, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal technique. The purpose of this Technical Note and video is to provide our preferred method of repair using an open, onlay-tissue fixation with all-suture anchors (FiberTak; Arthrex) and anatomic positioning of the biceps tendon on the radial tuberosity.

Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Orthopaedic practices have been markedly affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the ban on elective procedures, it is impossible to define the medical urgency of a case solely on whether a case is on an elective surgery schedule. Orthopaedic surgical procedures should consider COVID-19-associated risks and an assimilation of all available disease dependent, disease independent, and logistical information that is tailored to each patient, institution, and region. Using an evidence-based risk stratification of clinical urgency, we provide a framework for prioritization of orthopaedic sport medicine procedures that encompasses such factors. This can be used to facilitate the risk-benefit assessment of the timing and setting of a procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chronic distal biceps avulsion treated with suture button

BACKGROUND

Distal biceps tendon avulsions account for 3%-10% of all biceps ruptures. Treated nonoperatively, these injuries lead to a loss of endurance, supination strength, and flexion strength compared with operative repair or reconstruction. Operative management of chronic injury has classically been with graft tissue to augment the contracted muscle. We present our results for chronic distal biceps avulsions secured with suture button through a single transverse incision in high flexion without the need for allograft augmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 20 patients with 21 injuries who underwent primary surgical repair of chronic distal biceps tendon avulsions at an average of 10 weeks (range 4-42 weeks). All patients were treated with a single transverse incision with a suture button armed with nonabsorbable no. 2 core sutures. Postoperatively patients were found to have 50°-90° flexion contracture. All patients were placed in a simple sling postoperatively with gentle extension to gravity as tolerated immediately and no formal physical therapy. Patients were surveyed regarding pre- and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and overall satisfaction. Range of motion (ROM), flexion, and supination strength compared to the contralateral uninjured extremity were evaluated at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean clinical follow-up was 26 months. All patients regained full ROM and 5/5 flexion and supination strength at final follow-up. MEPSs were 100 for all responding patients compared with an average 47.5 preoperatively (P < .0001). The mean postoperative ASES score was 97.2 compared with 41.9 preoperatively (P < .0001). Mean OESs pre- and postoperatively were 24.2 and 48, respectively (P < .0001). The mean VAS score was 4.4 preoperatively and was reported as 0 by all patients at final follow-up (P < .0001). Two patients had transient sensory radial nerve neuropathy, and 1 patient has persistent palsy. No synostoses occurred. Four patients reported supination fatigue postoperatively compared with the uninjured extremity.

CONCLUSION

Given these results, we feel that chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures can be repaired successfully with a single incision using suture button technique without the use of a graft. Though the flexion contracture is significant postoperatively, all patients regained full ROM and had excellent postoperative functional outcome scores.

Distale Bizepssehnen- und Trizepssehnenrupturen

Rupturen der distalen Bizeps- und Trizepssehne sind selten, treten jedoch gehäuft bei männlichen, sportlichen und körperlich schwer arbeitenden Patienten auf. Dieser Übersichtsartikel beschreibt Ätiologie und Pathogenese sowie Diagnostik, Behandlungsmöglichkeiten, das zu erwartende Outcome dieser Verletzungen und gibt Einblicke in das eigene Vorgehen.

Clinical and sonographic evaluation of Endobutton distal biceps brachii tendon repair: what constitutes normal post-operative appearances?

OBJECTIVE

Distal biceps brachii tendon (DBBT) rupture is an uncommon but functionally significant injury given the loss of supination, flexion strength and pain that often result. Prompt surgical repair is preferred in most patients. Clinicoradiological post-operative follow-up is typically performed to assess DBBT repair integrity and function, frequently using ultrasound, though to date, no studies have described post-operative DBBT repair sonographic appearances. The purpose of this study was to evaluate post-operative DBBT sonographic appearances in the context of Endobutton repair with the following aims:i.Establish typical ultrasound appearances 12 months post-surgeryii.Establish the relationship between ultrasound appearances and clinical/functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients between February 2016 and October 2017 undergoing DBBT repair were prospectively recruited, all undergoing clinical and sonographic assessment 12 months post-surgery. Ultrasound data was collected on tendon integrity, tendon calibre and presence of intratendinous calcification, peritendinous fluid and peritendinous soft tissue/scarring. Clinical data was collected on active range of motion (ROM) (flexion, extension, supination, pronation) and strength (flexion and supination).

RESULTS

A total of 57/60 patients had intact DBBT repairs identified sonographically and clinically at 12 months. DBBT repairs had significantly increased cross-sectional area (mean 260%, 95% CI: 217%, 303%) compared with non-operated DBBT. Ninety-three percent of DBBT repairs were hypoechoic. Thirty percent contained intratendinous calcification. Peritendinous fluid/soft tissue was rarely observed. There was no significant correlation between DBBT calibre and strength/ROM parameters.

CONCLUSION

Normal post-operative sonographic appearances of Endobutton DBBT repair comprise a hypoechoic tendon significantly increased in calibre compared with non-operated tendon ± intratendinous calcification. DBBT repair calibre varies greatly, but is not associated with any significant difference in strength/ROM.

An intact lacertus fibrosus improves strength after reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon

PURPOSE

The importance of an intact lacertus fibrosus in distal biceps tendon injury is uncertain. This study aimed to assess long-term outcome following distal biceps tendon repair with focus on the significance of the lacertus fibrosus.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients surgically treated for primary distal biceps tendon rupture were identified. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics in addition to surgery-related data. All patients underwent a targeted clinical examination to assess elbow function and they completed a patient reported questionnaire. Radiographs were obtained at time of follow-up and evaluated for the presence of osteoarthritis (OA) and heterotopic ossification (HO).

RESULTS

All patients were male. Median age at injury was 48 years (34-69) and median time of follow-up of was 71 months (23-165). All patients presented functional range of motion in the elbow. Median flexion strength was 76 Nm (45-135) (median 99% of uninjured side; range 66-128) with intact lacertus fibrosus and 70 Nm (43-124) (88%, 62-114) with torn lacertus fibrosus. Median supination strength was 6 Nm (3-11) (86%, range 36-144) with intact lacertus fibrosus and 8 Nm (3-17) (67%, 28-118) with torn lacertus fibrosus. No signs of OA were revealed, but three patients had major HO of which one patient had minor limitations in range of elbow motion.

CONCLUSION

An intact lacertus fibrosus contributes to elbow strength and should be preserved in distal biceps tendon repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Primary repair of severely retracted nonchronic distal biceps tendon rupture using 2-incision anterior-approach repair

Background

Primary repair of a severely retracted distal biceps tendon can pose a technical challenge. We sought to describe the method and clinical outcomes of a surgical technique used as an adjunct to the conventional anterior single-incision repair for severely retracted biceps tendons. This technique involves a second anterior incision proximally to retrieve a severely retracted tendon followed by passing the tendon through a soft-tissue tunnel.

Methods

We identified 30 consecutive patients who had undergone a primary distal biceps tendon repair by an anterior-approach cortical-button technique. A phone survey was conducted for patient-reported outcomes. Patients returned for bilateral forearm supination strength testing in 2 positions (45º of pronation and 45º of supination). Outcomes were compared between patients who required a second incision and high elbow flexion (>60º) because of severe tendon retraction and those who did not require such interventions.

Results

No significant differences in elbow range of motion, supination strength, or patient-reported outcomes were found between the 2 groups of patients (P > .05). Regarding supination strength, the operated side was significantly weaker than the uninjured side in both pronated and supinated positions (P < .05). Both the operated and uninjured sides showed significantly higher torque in a pronated position than in a supinated position (P < .05).

Conclusions

Severely retracted distal biceps tendons can be successfully repaired using a second incision and high elbow flexion without negative effects on the outcomes. Supination strength was decreased following an anterior-approach cortical-button technique, but patient-reported outcomes were not affected negatively.

Restoration of peak strength and endurance following distal biceps reconstruction with allograft for chronic ruptures

BACKGROUND

Distal biceps reconstruction for chronic rupture often requires a graft to recover length and allow for distal tendon reattachment to bone. Our purpose was to assess peak strength and endurance recovery following biceps reconstruction with tendon grafts.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that allograft reconstruction would result in decreased flexion and supination peak strength and endurance.

METHODS

Consecutive distal biceps reconstructions with allograft, performed for chronic ruptures between January 2008 and March 2018 at a single institution, were reviewed. Isokinetic dynamometry for peak strength and endurance testing was performed on the operative and contralateral arms in flexion and supination. Functional outcomes and overall satisfaction with the operation were determined.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were available for a complete evaluation, including dynamometry, at a mean of 46 months postoperatively. Reconstructions demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward decreased peak flexion strength (P = .06), and significantly decreased peak supination strength (P = .01) compared with the unaffected arm. There were no differences in flexion and supination endurance between the affected and unaffected arms. Using standardized outcome scales, patients reported excellent function.

CONCLUSION

Chronic biceps ruptures undergoing reconstruction are highly functional and patients are satisfied. Somewhat surprisingly, supination and flexion endurance were equal to the contralateral, uninvolved arm. However, this procedure does not restore peak supination strength.

Diagnosis, Etiology and Outcomes of Revision Distal Biceps Tendon Reattachment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, etiology, and clinical outcomes after revision distal biceps tendon repair. We hypothesized that re-ruptures are rare and can be reattached with satisfactory results.

METHODS

Cases were identified from the case log of the senior author. Demographic information, details regarding the primary repair and subsequent injury, time between reinjury and reattachment, and operative findings were recorded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow (ASES-E) functional outcome scoring systems. Range of motion, strength, and ability to return to work were recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 10 patients with re-rupture, all of whom were men. Average age was 46 years (range, 35-57 years). Four ruptures occurred in the dominant arm. Three patients had a history of bilateral ruptures. Incidence of primary failure was 1.1%. In 6 patients, re-rupture occurred 6 days to 11 months after the primary surgery. Three patients described a sense of ripping or tearing after a specific traumatic event. Four others had persistent pain after the primary reattachment. Re-rupture resulted from the loss of fixation owing to technical error, the suture pulling out from the tendon, or suture breakage. Two patients required an allograft. The hook test was abnormal in 3 patients. Magnetic resonance imaging results did not affect the operative plan. Nine patients returned to their former occupation. Five returned for follow-up evaluation and completion of the DASH and ASES-E self-assessment examinations. Average DASH score was 4.4 (range, 0-19) and average ASES-E was 93.2 (range, 74-100). Postoperative average elbow flexion was 141° (range, 135° to 145°), elbow extension was -12° (range, -5° to -30°), pronation was 70°, and supination was 80°. Postoperative average supination strength was 87.8% of the nonsurgical arm (range, 79% to 106%); average pronation strength was 79.2% of the nonsurgical arm (range, 50% to 110%).

CONCLUSIONS

Revision reattachment resulted in acceptable functional outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Distal Biceps Tendon Repair and Reconstruction

Distal biceps tendon ruptures can result in functionally significant loss of supination and flexion strength, as well as decreased resistance to fatigue. Although the diagnosis of distal biceps tendon ruptures remains straightforward, substantial debate continues with regards to surgical indications, pertinent surgical anatomy, single- versus double-incision surgical technique, and fixation options. This review discusses the latest evidence-based literature regarding distal biceps tendon repair/reconstruction including types of tears, demographics, clues for diagnosis, surgical indications, anatomy with special attention to how the distal tendon inserts distally and the relevant tuberosity anatomy (height and cam effect), common reconstruction techniques (single- vs double-incision and single-incision power optimizing cost-effective technique), fixation techniques (bone tunnels, distal biceps button, interference screw, button plus screw), surgical technique pearls, postoperative rehabilitation, postoperative outcomes, as well as the treatment of chronic tears with special reconstruction techniques including Achilles allograft, pedicled latissimus transfer, and the use of a free innervated gracilis.

Distal biceps tendon ruptures - the relation of radiological retraction and chronicity to the ability of tendon reattachment and long-term functional outcomes

Aims

To assess whether the degree of radiological retraction and chronicity of distal biceps tendon ruptures are related to the ability to reattach the tendon and long-term functional outcomes.

Methods

Analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for distal biceps tendon ruptures by a single surgeon. Measurements regarding the site and degree of tendon retraction in relation to anatomical landmarks following rupture were correlated with intraoperative findings. Postoperative functional outcomes were assessed in cases with >12 months follow-up.

Results

24 cases of distal biceps tendon ruptures treated surgically were identified. Mean tendon retraction was 6.0 cm (range 1.2-9.5) from the radial tuberosity. 22 cases were reattached successfully. 2 required ligament augmentation/bridging using a synthetic ligament. In 2 cases the tendon could not be reattached due to poor quality of the tendon stump. Ability to reattach the tendon was unrelated to degree of radiological retraction or chronicity of rupture. Degree of retraction was not related to rupture chronicity. All reattachments healed with no re-rupture at follow-up with no substantial motion loss. In 17 cases >12months follow-up the DASH and OES were not related to retraction or chronicity of rupture.

Conclusions

Radiological retraction and chronicity are not related to the ability to reattach distal biceps tendon ruptures or their clinical outcomes, hence should not discourage surgical exploration and attempted reattachment. Substantial tendon retractions can occur acutely and reattachment in considerable flexion did not produce any significant motion loss. Some cases will need augmentation or gap bridging and augmentation devices need to be available at surgery.

Level of evidence

Level IV Retrospective Study Defined.

Surgical Reconstruction Options in Chronic Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures - Case Report and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures are rare and conservative or operative treatment options are suitable. There is a consensus in the literature in case of acute traumatic ruptures the operative refixation should be preferred. Disagreement exists in the best way of care of old ruptures (> 4 weeks) of distal biceps tendon. Several kinds of refixation possibilities up to tendon grafts are described. Aim of this publication is showing an overview of the literature of the approved methods in reconstruction of the distal biceps tendon using autogenous and allogenic grafts, comparing the outcomes and transferring them on an own case.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature research was carried out using the online medical database "PubMed" with the following keywords "chronic rupture distal biceps tendon, surgical techniques". 59 citations were found concerning the topic, 37 publications were relevant for this work.

RESULTS

There is consensus that even in chronic ruptures the operative management of the distal biceps tendon generates the best results. Consistently the experiences and results of only little patient collectives are reported. Numerous techniques of surgery are described without predominance of one method. Reinsertions of the tendon butts are reported in different techniques: with achilles, palmaris longus, fascia lata, triceps, quadriceps and semitendinosus tendon grafts. All together they showed postoperative satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

With surgical treatment of chronic ruptured distal biceps tendons comparable outcomes can be achieved by primary refixation and graft augmentations. In case of graft augmentations several tissue options are available which showed in all cases satisfactory functional results in the end.

Brachial distal biceps injuries

Distal biceps injuries are a relatively uncommon clinical condition that typically affect middle-aged males. They commonly occur due to an eccentric overload as the arm is forced from a flexed to extended position. Patients may experience an acute 'pop' and present with arm pain, swelling, and ecchymosis. Treatment options include nonoperative management or surgical repair. The aim of this concise review of distal biceps ruptures is to examine the relevant anatomy, clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment options for these injuries.

The Treatment of Distal Biceps Ruptures: An Overview

Traumatic lesions of the distal biceps brachii are uncommon. They often result from rapid elbow flexion against resistance. Conservative treatment is only indicated in low-demanding patient and in those who have severe comorbidities. Regarding the surgical approach, two options are available: the single- and the double-incision techniques. The former has been the first to be described and was associated with significant rate of neurologic complications. The second showed less frequent neurologic lesions, but considerable rate of heterotopic ossifications with reduced forearm movement. The choice of fixation device is another important issue. Cortical buttons, transosseous repair, suture anchors, and interference screws have shown satisfactory outcomes. However, cortical buttons have the best mechanical properties. Although a lack of high methodological quality studies emerges in the available literature, three recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis show interesting findings. Surgical reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii yields satisfactory clinical outcomes both with the single- and double-incision techniques. Higher prevalence of nerve injuries is associated with the single-incision techniques, whereas higher prevalence of heterotopic ossification is reported with double-incision techniques. Thus far, there is no sufficient evidence to support one option and the choice is mainly based on surgeon's experience.

[Rupture of the distal biceps tendon]

With an incidence of 3% of all biceps tendon injuries, rupture of the distal biceps tendon is a rare injury but can be associated with significant functional impairment of the elbow. In case of a complete rupture, the diagnosis can be made clinically with a pronounced power deficit, in particular for supination of the forearm. In cases of unclear symptoms magnetic resonance imaging should be included. Regarding the therapeutic approach, there is general consensus in the current literature that surgical treatment with anatomical reconstruction of the tendon footprint is superior to the conservative approach. Various surgical techniques with good biomechanical and clinical results are currently available but no clear superiority of a single technique has so far been demonstrated.

The Radioulnar Distance at the Level of the Radial Tuberosity

Ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon are generally treated operatively due to their loss of supination and flexion force. A mechanical impingement at the insertion of the tendon at the radial tuberosity is discussed to play a role in the etiology of this injury. The aim of this study was to present a detailed, three-dimensional anatomical analysis of the radioulnar space at the radial tuberosity. A total of 166 imprints of the radioulnar space in neutral rotation and pronation from 84 cadaveric specimens of both arms using silicone impression material were produced for this study. Imprints were cut in slices of 3 mm and digitally measured after picture acquisition using a high-resolution digital camera. Distances were grouped into a proximal, central, and distal groups and used for correlation to morphometric data at the elbow (radial head diameter, ulna and radius length) as well as volume calculation. The mean radioulnar distance was 8.8 ± 4.0 mm in neutral rotation and 7.8 ± 3.9 mm in pronation. In pronation, the central zone was the smallest whereas in neutral rotation the proximal zone was the smallest. The volume of the radioulnar space did not reduce significantly during pronation. Little space is provided for the insertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon especially during pronation. This could play a role in the etiology of distal biceps brachii tendon ruptures and should be considered in the fixation after rupture of the tendon. Clin. Anat., 33:661-666, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Biomechanical Comparison of Onlay Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: All-Suture Anchors Versus Titanium Suture Anchors

BACKGROUND

A rupture of the distal biceps tendon is the most common tendon rupture of the elbow and has received increased attention in the past few years. Newly developed all-suture anchors have the potential to minimize surgical trauma and the risk of adverse events because of the use of flexible drills and smaller drill diameters.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to biomechanically compare all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair in cadaveric specimens. The hypothesis was that all-suture anchors would show no differences in load to failure or displacement under cyclic loading compared with titanium suture anchors.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Sixteen unpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were randomized to 2 groups, which underwent onlay distal biceps tendon repair with 2 anchors. Bone mineral density at the radial tuberosity was evaluated in each specimen. In the first group, distal biceps tendon repair was performed using all-suture anchors. In the second group, titanium suture anchors were applied. After cyclic loading for 3000 cycles, the repair constructs were loaded to failure. The peak load to failure as well as repair construct stiffness and mode of failure were determined.

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) peak load was 293.53 ± 122.15 N for all-suture anchors and 280.02 ± 69.34 N for titanium suture anchors (P = .834); mean stiffness was 19.78 ± 2.95 N/mm and 19.30 ± 4.98 N/mm, respectively (P = .834). The mode of failure was anchor pullout for all specimens during load to failure. At the proximal position, all-suture anchors showed a displacement of 1.53 ± 0.80 mm, and titanium suture anchors showed a displacement of 0.81 ± 0.50 mm (P = .021) under cyclic loading. At the distal position, a displacement of 1.86 ± 1.04 mm for all-suture anchors and 1.53 ± 1.15 mm for titanium suture anchors was measured (P = .345). A positive correlation between bone mineral density and load to failure was observed (r = 0.605; P = .013).

CONCLUSION

All-suture anchors were biomechanically equivalent at time zero to titanium suture anchors for onlay distal biceps tendon repair. While the proximally placed all-suture anchors demonstrated greater displacement than titanium suture anchors, the comparable displacement at the distal position as well as the similar load and mechanism of failure make this difference unlikely to be clinically significant.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

All-suture anchors performed similarly to titanium suture anchors for onlay distal biceps tendon repair at time zero and represent a reasonable alternative.