Successful reconstruction for complex malunions and nonunions of the tibia and femur

Comparison of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting with closed reduction and intramedullary device insertion for tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical efficacy of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting (G_M) and closed reduction (G_C) using intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 70 tibial shaft fractures treated with G_M or G_C between January 2018 and December 2021. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two treatment methods.

RESULTS

This study included 70 patients who were followed-up for 12.4 months. In total, 31 and 39 patients were treated with G_M and G_C, respectively. The operative duration was significantly shorter for G_M (95.2 ± 19.3 min) than for G_C (105.5 ± 22.2 min, p = 0.0454). The number of radiation times was significantly lower for G_M (14.7 ± 6.3) than for G_C (22.2 ± 9.2, p < 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the wound complication or infection rates. The malunion and nonunion rates were high after G_C than after G_M, but there are no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing remains the first choice for tibial shaft fractures. G_M is a safe and effective treatment worth considering. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Augmented Stability in Leaving Original Internal Fixation with Multidimensional Cross Locking Plate through Mini-Open Femoral Anterior Approach for Aseptic Femoral Shaft Nonunion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Aseptic femoral shaft nonunion constitutes approximately 1%-10% of all femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, possibly attributable to the lack of anti-rotational stability. Although a lateral locking plate (LP) with retainment of original IMN has shown the most success, lateral LP inflicts significant surgical trauma on patients. Therefore, the Multidimensional Cross Locking Plate (MDC-LP) was designed based on a mini-open femoral anterior approach. We aim to report and compare the technical aspects and clinical outcomes of using anterior MDC-LP or lateral LP with retention of original IMN for the treatment of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion.

METHODS

In this single center retrospective cohort study, records of 49 patients who had undergone revision of femoral shaft aseptic nonunion with anterior MDC-LP or lateral LP while retaining the original IMN from January 2015 to October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Information on patients' demographics, clinical data, and surgical outcomes were gathered and analyzed. X-ray and CT scans were used for bone union evaluation and the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) was used for follow-up functional evaluation. For quantitative data, the Student's t-test was used if the data were normally distributed. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for non-normally distributed data. For qualitative data, the Chi-square test was used for comparisons.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were treated with anterior MDC-LP, and 22 patients were treated with lateral LP. There are no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, time since initial femoral shaft fracture, initial fracture type (close/open), nonunion type, or nonunion location between patients' group. Among patients treated with anterior MDC-LP, an average of 2-months advantage in time to union was observed (4.09 months vs. 6.8 months in the lateral LP group: P = 0.000), smaller incision was required for MDC-LP installment (7.7 cm vs 17.1 cm in lateral LP group: P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion with retainment of original IMN, anterior MDC-LP via mini-open femoral anterior approach described in this study is a better option than lateral LP for achieving faster bone union and satisfactory functional outcome with less surgical trauma.

Contemporary management of aseptic diaphyseal tibia non-unions - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Tibia fractures are the most common long bone injuries encountered in the trauma population. The majority are treated successfully but non-union remains a common complication. A systematic review of current evidence regarding the management for aseptic diaphyseal tibial non-unions was undertaken.

METHODS

A systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 632 publications were screened for inclusion. Full text review of 91 studies resulted in 26 publications being retained for final review. The majority of patients included in the studies either underwent exchange nailing (n=315) or primary intramedullary nailing (n=174) with respective union rates of 88% and 95% being achieved. The highest union rate (97%) was achieved with the use of fine wire external fixation. The major adjuvant treatment modalities were fibula osteotomies (n=372; 41%), fixation dynamization (n=208; 23%) and bone grafting (n=183; 20%).

CONCLUSION

The lack of standardization in reporting of outcomes and the diversity of management strategies employed precludes definitive conclusions or recommendations. Further research is required to ascertain the ideal treatment strategy in the management of aseptic tibial diaphyseal non-unions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical translation of a patient-specific scaffold-guided bone regeneration concept in four cases with large long bone defects

Background

Bone defects after trauma, infection, or tumour resection present a challenge for patients and clinicians. To date, autologous bone graft (ABG) is the gold standard for bone regeneration. To address the limitations of ABG such as limited harvest volume as well as overly fast remodelling and resorption, a new treatment strategy of scaffold-guided bone regeneration (SGBR) was developed. In a well-characterized sheep model of large to extra-large tibial segmental defects, three-dimensional (3D) printed composite scaffolds have shown clinically relevant biocompatibility and osteoconductive capacity in SGBR strategies. Here, we report four challenging clinical cases with large complex posttraumatic long bone defects using patient-specific SGBR as a successful treatment.

Methods

After giving informed consent computed tomography (CT) images were used to design patient-specific biodegradable medical-grade polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP, 80:20 ​wt%) scaffolds. The CT scans were segmented using Materialise Mimics to produce a defect model and the scaffold parts were designed with Autodesk Meshmixer. Scaffold prototypes were 3D-printed to validate robust clinical handling and bone defect fit. The final scaffold design was additively manufactured under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for patient-specific and custom-made implants by Osteopore International Pte Ltd.

Results

Four patients (age: 23–42 years) with posttraumatic lower extremity large long bone defects (case 1: 4 ​cm distal femur, case 2: 10 ​cm tibia shaft, case 3: complex malunion femur, case 4: irregularly shaped defect distal tibia) are presented. After giving informed consent, the patients were treated surgically by implanting a custom-made mPCL-TCP scaffold loaded with ABG (case 2: additional application of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2) harvested with the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator system (RIA, Synthes®). In all cases, the scaffolds matched the actual anatomical defect well and no perioperative adverse events were observed. Cases 1, 3 and 4 showed evidence of bony ingrowth into the large honeycomb pores (pores >2 ​mm) and fully interconnected scaffold architecture with indicative osseous bridges at the bony ends on the last radiographic follow-up (8–9 months after implantation). Comprehensive bone regeneration and full weight bearing were achieved in case 2 ​at follow-up 23 months after implantation.

Conclusion

This study shows the bench to bedside translation of guided bone regeneration principles into scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. The scaffold design in SGBR should have a tissue-specific morphological signature which stimulates and directs the stages from the initial host response towards the full regeneration. Thereby, the scaffolds provide a physical niche with morphology and biomaterial properties that allow cell migration, proliferation, and formation of vascularized tissue in the first one to two months, followed by functional bone formation and the capacity for physiological bone remodelling. Great design flexibility of composite scaffolds to support the one to three-year bone regeneration was observed in four patients with complex long bone defects.

The translational potential of this article

This study reports on the clinical efficacy of SGBR in the treatment of long bone defects. Moreover, it presents a comprehensive narrative of the rationale of this technology, highlighting its potential for bone regeneration treatment regimens in patients with any type of large and complex osseous defects.

[Research progress of augmentation plate for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation]

OBJECTIVE

To review the history, current situation, and progress of augmentation plate (AP) for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation.

METHODS

The results of the clinical studies about the AP in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation in recent years were widely reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The AP has been successfully applied to femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation since 1997. According to breakage of the previous nailing, AP is divided into two categories: AP with retaining the previous intramedullary nail and AP with exchanging intramedullary nail. AP is not only suitable for simple nonunion, but also for complex nonunion with severe deformity. Compared with exchanging intramedullary nail, lateral plate, and dual plate, AP has less surgical trauma, shorter healing time, higher healing rate, and faster returning to society. However, there are still some problems with the revision method, including difficulty in bicortical screw fixation, lack of anatomic plate suitable for femoral shaft nonunion, and lack of postoperative function and quality of life assessment.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other revision methods, AP could achieve higher fracture healing rate and better clinical prognosis for patients with femoral shaft nonunion. However, whether patients benefit from AP in terms of function and quality of life remain uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to further confirm that AP are superior to the other revision fixations.

Preoperative Evaluation and Optimization for Reconstruction of Segmental Bone Defects of the Tibia

Reconstruction of segmental bone defects requires a large commitment both on the part of the patient and the physician. Investing in preoperative evaluation and optimization is the only logical way to pursue such an endeavor. Unfortunately, detailed studies regarding segmental bone defects and preoperative factors are relatively lacking owing to the relatively low incidence of the problem. Fortunately, other orthopaedic pathologies (arthritis, ligamentous injuries about the knee) have high prevalence and consistency, allowing detailed analysis of preoperative factors. We review this literature, and that directly involving segmental bone defects when available, to guide surgeons planning segmental bone defect reconstruction.

Presence of Failed Fracture Implants in Association With Lower Extremity Long Bone Nonunion Does Not Portend Worse Outcome After Nonunion Repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the finding of failed fracture implants in association with lower extremity long bone fracture nonunion portends worse clinical or functional outcome after surgical nonunion repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

PATIENTS

One hundred eighty-one patients who presented to our institution over a 10-year period and underwent surgical repair of a lower extremity fracture nonunion.

INTERVENTION

Surgical repair of lower extremity fracture nonunion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to union, postoperative complications, visual analog scale pain scores, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores after lower extremity nonunion repair. Data were analyzed to assess for differences in postoperative outcomes based on the integrity of fracture implants at the time of nonunion diagnosis. Implant integrity was defined using 3 groups: broken implants (BI), implants intact (II), and no implants (NI).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in time to union after surgery between the BI, II, or NI groups (mean 8.1 months vs. 7.6 months vs. 6.2 months, respectively). Fourteen patients (7.7%) failed to heal, including 5 BI patients, 7 II patients, and 2 NI patients. One tibial nonunion patient in each of the 3 groups underwent amputation for persistent nonunion after multiple failed revision attempts at a mean of 4.8 years after initial injury. There was no difference in postoperative pain scores, the rate of postoperative complications, or functional outcome scores identified between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of failed fracture implants at the time of lower extremity long bone nonunion diagnosis does not portend worse clinical or functional outcome after surgical nonunion repair. Patients who present with failed fracture implants at the time of nonunion diagnosis can anticipate similar time to union, complication rates, and functional outcomes when compared with patients who present with intact implants or those with history of nonoperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diaphyseal osteotomy after post-traumatic malalignment

Tibia and femur shaft fractures can sometimes lead to post-traumatic deformities. Correction by means of circular external frames is a valuable option. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the problem and to focus on some important technical issues of the preoperative planning, the surgical procedures, and the postsurgical management of circular external fixators.

Outcomes of Schatzker II tibial plateau fracture open reduction internal fixation using structural bone allograft

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to report the rate of anatomic reduction, articular subsidence, and clinical outcomes for Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures treated with structural bone allografts.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective case series.

SETTING

Academic Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A trauma registry was used to identify 77 Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures.

INTERVENTION

Schatzker II tibial plateau fracture open reduction internal fixation and structural bone graft using either Plexur P (N = 29) or fibular allograft (N = 48).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The primary outcome was articular subsidence. Secondary outcomes included fracture malreduction and clinical outcomes including the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and the Short Form (SF)-36.

RESULTS

No patients experienced subsidence > 2mm. This rate is significantly lower than published rates for autogenous iliac crest (30.3%, P < 0.0001) and calcium phosphate cement (8.7%, P = 0.0099). The rate of fracture malreduction was 11.7% (9/77); only 4 had more than 3 mm of residual incongruity. Average outcome scores were the following: Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale, 81.7; Lower Extremity Functional Scale, 78.5; SF-36 physical component, 48.3; and SF-36 mental component, 53.1. There was no difference between patients treated with Plexur P or fibula with regard to the primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of structural allograft resulted in a high rate of anatomic reduction and negligible rate of articular subsidence and good clinical outcomes in the treatment of this population of Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures. This compares favorably with historical results using nonstructural grafts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level IV. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.