Association between systemic lupus erythematosus and osteoporosis: a mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Osteoporosis are two prevalent medical conditions. Previous studies have suggested a possible correlation between SLE and osteoporosis, though the underpinning causal relationship remains largely unknown. The current study aimed to elucidate the causal association between SLE and osteoporosis by employing a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

METHODS

We performed two-sample MR analysis using the inverse variance-weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger methods on publicly available summary statistics datasets using a SLE genome-wide association study (GWAS) as an exposure and osteoporosis GWASs in people with East Asia ancestry as outcomes. The pleiotropy and heterogeneity were examined using a variety of techniques, including the MR-Egger intercept, the MR-PRESSO approach, and the Cochran's Q test.

RESULTS

We selected 26 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a SLE GWAS as instrumental variables for osteoporosis. The IVW (p < 0.05) method results support a potential association between SLE and osteoporosis. MR-Egger intercept (p = 0.82) and MR-PRESSO global test (p = 0.80) did not suggest evidence of horizontal or directional pleiotropy. Cochran's Q test (p = 0.78) showed that there was no heterogeneity between IVs.

CONCLUSION

The results of MR analysis indicated that SLE is likely associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis incidence. Our findings highlight the need for increased awareness the potential risk of osteoporosis among SLE patients.

Investigating the causal association between systemic lupus erythematosus and migraine using Mendelian randomization analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be genetically causally associated with migraine, including the two primary subtypes: migraine with aura (MWA) and migraine without aura (MWoA).

BACKGROUND

The association between SLE and migraine has been investigated extensively. Previous studies have shown a higher prevalence of migraine in patients with SLE, although the exact relationship remains unclear. This study investigated the potential causal association between SLE and migraine using the powerful analytical tool of Mendelian randomization (MR).

METHODS

We performed two-sample MR analysis of publicly available summary statistic datasets using inverse variance-weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger methods based on an SLE genome-wide association study (GWAS; 5201 cases; 9066 controls; the exposure frequency is 36.5%) as an exposure and migraine GWAS (15,905 cases; 264,662 controls) in individuals with European ancestry as outcomes, focusing on the two migraine subtypes MWA (6780 cases; 264,662 controls) and MWoA (5787 cases; 264,662 controls). Thepleiotropy and heterogeneity were performed.

RESULTS

We selected 42 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from SLE GWAS as instrumental variables (IVs) for SLE on migraine, and 41 SNP IVs for SLE on MWA or MWoA. The IVW (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.99, 1.03], p = 0.271), weighted median (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = [0.97, 1.03], p = 0.914), and MR-Egger (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = [0.99, 1.09], p = 0.153) methods showed no causal effect of SLE on migraine. A causal effect of SLE was observed on MWA (IVW: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = [1.02, 1.08], p = 0.001; weighted median: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = [1.01, 1.10], p = 0.018; MR-Egger: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = [1.01, 1.14], p = 0.035 and pIVW < 0.017 [Bonferroni correction]) but not MWoA (IVW: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = [0.96, 1.02], p = 0.331; weighted median: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = [0.94, 1.03], p = 0.496; MR-Egger: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = [0.95, 1.09], p = 0.652). The results showed no significant pleiotropy or heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our MR analysis demonstrated the complex relationship between SLE and migraine, suggesting a potential effect of SLE on the risk of MWA but not MWoA. These findings can aid in the development of improved subtype-specific management of migraine in patients with SLE.

Comparison of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting with closed reduction and intramedullary device insertion for tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical efficacy of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting (G_M) and closed reduction (G_C) using intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 70 tibial shaft fractures treated with G_M or G_C between January 2018 and December 2021. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two treatment methods.

RESULTS

This study included 70 patients who were followed-up for 12.4 months. In total, 31 and 39 patients were treated with G_M and G_C, respectively. The operative duration was significantly shorter for G_M (95.2 ± 19.3 min) than for G_C (105.5 ± 22.2 min, p = 0.0454). The number of radiation times was significantly lower for G_M (14.7 ± 6.3) than for G_C (22.2 ± 9.2, p < 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the wound complication or infection rates. The malunion and nonunion rates were high after G_C than after G_M, but there are no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing remains the first choice for tibial shaft fractures. G_M is a safe and effective treatment worth considering. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.