Return of motor function after segmental nerve loss in a rat model: comparison of autogenous nerve graft, collagen conduit, and processed allograft (AxoGen)

Nerve Allografts: Current Utility and Future Directions

Processed nerve allograft is a widely accepted tool for reconstructing peripheral nerve defects. Repair parameters that need to be considered include gap length, nerve diameter, nerve type (motor, sensory, or mixed), and the soft tissue envelope. Although the use of processed nerve allograft must be considered based on each unique clinical scenario, a rough algorithm can be formed based on the available animal and clinical literature. This article critically reviews the current surgical algorithm, defines the role of processed nerve allograft compared with nerve autograft, and discusses how this role may change in the future.

Nerve Regeneration after a Nerve Graft in a Rat Model: The Effectiveness of Fibrin Glue

BACKGROUND

Simulating the post-traumatic continuity defect of small human peripheral nerves, we compared the effectiveness of fibrin glue with neurorrhaphy for nerve gap restoration.

METHODS

In twenty-four male Wistar rats, a fifteen mm defect in one sciatic nerve only was made and immediately repaired with an inverted polarity autograft. According to the used technique, rats were divided into Group A (Control), using traditional neurorrhaphy, and Group B (Study), using fibrine glue sealing; in total, 50% of rats were sacrificed at 16 weeks and 50% at 21 weeks. Before sacrifice, an assessment of motor function was done through Walking Track Analysis and an electroneurophysiological evaluation. After sacrifice, selected muscle mass indexes and the histology of the regenerated nerves were assessed. All data were evaluated by Student's t test for unpaired data.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups, with only the exception of a relative improvement in the tibialis anterior muscle's number of motor units in the study group.

CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that the use of fibrin glue as a nerve sealant is not superior in terms of functional recovery, its effectiveness is comparable to that of microsurgical repair. Hence, the faster and technically easier glueing technique could deserve broader clinical application.

The effectiveness of acellular nerve allografts compared to autografts in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of nerve injuries proves to be a worldwide clinical challenge. Acellular nerve allografts are suggested to be a promising alternative for bridging a nerve gap to the current gold standard, an autologous nerve graft.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy of the acellular nerve allograft, its difference from the gold standard (the nerve autograft) and to discuss its possible indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched until the 4th of January 2022. Original peer reviewed paper that presented 1) distinctive data; 2) a clear comparison between not immunologically processed acellular allografts and autologous nerve transfers; 3) was performed in laboratory animals of all species and sex. Meta analyses and subgroup analyses (for graft length and species) were conducted for muscle weight, sciatic function index, ankle angle, nerve conduction velocity, axon count diameter, tetanic contraction and amplitude using a Random effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted on graft length and species.

RESULTS

Fifty articles were included in this review and all were included in the meta-analyses. An acellular allograft resulted in a significantly lower muscle weight, sciatic function index, ankle angle, nerve conduction velocity, axon count and smaller diameter, tetanic contraction compared to an autologous nerve graft. No difference was found in amplitude between acellular allografts and autologous nerve transfers. Post hoc subgroup analyses of graft length showed a significant reduced muscle weight in long grafts versus small and medium length grafts. All included studies showed a large variance in methodological design.

CONCLUSION

Our review shows that the included studies, investigating the use of acellular allografts, showed a large variance in methodological design and are as a consequence difficult to compare. Nevertheless, our results indicate that treating a nerve gap with an allograft results in an inferior nerve recovery compared to an autograft in seven out of eight outcomes assessed in experimental animals. In addition, based on our preliminary post hoc subgroup analyses we suggest that when an allograft is being used an allograft in short and medium (0-1cm, > 1-2cm) nerve gaps is preferred over an allograft in long (> 2cm) nerve gaps.

Functional outcomes of nerve allografts augmented with mesenchymal stem cells and surgical angiogenesis in a rat sciatic nerve defect model

BACKGROUND

Motor function recovery following acellular nerve allograft (ANA) repair remains inferior to autologous nerve reconstruction. We investigated the functional recovery of ANAs after combined mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) delivery and surgical angiogenesis in a rat sciatic nerve defect model.

METHODS

In 100 Lewis rats, unilateral sciatic nerve defects were reconstructed with (I) autografts, (II) ANAs, (III) ANAs wrapped with a superficial inferior epigastric artery fascial (SIEF) flap, combined with either (IV) undifferentiated MSCs or (V) Schwann cell-like differentiated MSCs. The tibialis anterior muscle area was evaluated during the survival period using ultrasonography. Functional recovery, histomorphometry, and immunofluorescence were assessed at 12 and 16 weeks.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, the addition of surgical angiogenesis and MSCs improved ankle contractures. The SIEF flap also significantly improved compound muscle action potential (CMAP) outcomes compared with ANAs. Autografts outperformed all groups in muscle force and weight. At 16 weeks, ankle contractures of ANAs remained inferior to autografts and SIEF, whereas the CMAP amplitude was comparable between groups. The muscle force of autografts remained superior to all other groups, and the muscle weight of ANAs remained inferior to autografts. No differences were found in histomorphometry outcomes between SIEF groups and ANAs. Vascularity, determined by CD34 staining, was significantly higher in SIEF groups compared with ANAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of surgical angiogenesis and MSCs did not result in a synergistic improvement in functional outcomes. In a short nerve gap model, the adipofascial flap may provide sufficient MSCs to ANAs without additional ex vivo MSC seeding.

A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Comparison of Conduits Versus Decellularized Nerve Allograft for Digital Nerve Repairs

PURPOSE

While there are advantages and disadvantages to both processed nerve allografts (PNA) and conduits, a large, well-controlled prospective study is needed to compare the efficacy and to delineate how each of these repair tools can be best applied to digital nerve injuries. We hypothesized that PNA digital nerve repairs would achieve superior functional recovery for longer length gaps compared with conduit-based repairs.

METHODS

Patients (aged 18-69 years) presenting with suspected acute or subacute (less than 24 weeks old) digital nerve injuries were recruited to prticipate at 20 medical centers across the United States. After stratification to short (5-14 mm) and long (15-25 mm) gap subgroups, the patients were randomized (1:1) to repair with either a commercially available PNA or collagen conduit. Baseline and outcomes assessments were obtained either before or immediately after surgery and planned at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months after surgery. All assessors and patients were blinded to the treatment arm.

RESULTS

In total, 220 patients were enrolled, and 183 patients completed an acceptable last evaluable visit (at least 6 months and not more than 15 months postrepair). At last follow-up, for the short gap repair groups, average static two-point discrimination was 7.3 ± 2.8 mm for PNA and 7.5 ± 3.1 mm for conduit repairs. For the long gap group, average static two-point discrimination was significantly lower at 6.1 ± 3.3 mm for PNA compared with 7.5 ± 2.4 mm for conduit repairs. Normal sensation (American Society for Surgery of the Hand scale) was achieved in 40% of PNA long gap repairs, which was significantly more than the 18% observed in long conduit patients. Long gap conduits had more clinical failures (lack of protective sensation) than short gap conduits.

CONCLUSIONS

Although supporting similar levels of nerve regeneration for short gap length digital nerve repairs, PNA was clinically superior to conduits for long gap reconstructions.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Challenges in Nerve Repair and Reconstruction

Peripheral nerve injuries may substantially impair a patient's function and quality of life. Despite appropriate treatment, outcomes often remain poor. Direct repair remains the standard of care when repair is possible without excessive tension. For larger nerve defects, nerve autografting is the gold standard. However, a considerable challenge is donor site morbidity. Processed nerve allografts and conduits are other options, but evidence supporting their use is limited to smaller nerves and shorter gaps. Nerve transfer is another technique that has seen increasing popularity. The future of care may include novel biologics and pharmacologic therapy to enhance regeneration.

Matrilin-2 within a three-dimensional lysine-modified chitosan porous scaffold enhances Schwann cell migration and axonal outgrowth for peripheral nerve regeneration

Background: Matrilin-2 is a key extracellular matrix protein involved in peripheral nerve regeneration. We sought to develop a biomimetic scaffold to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration by incorporating matrilin-2 within a chitosan-derived porous scaffold. We hypothesized that the use of such a novel biomaterial delivers microenvironmental cues to facilitate Schwann cell (SC) migration and enhance axonal outgrowth during peripheral nerve regeneration. Materials and Methods: The effect of matrilin-2 on SC migration was evaluated with agarose drop migration assay on matrilin-2 coated dishes. SC adhesion was determined with SCs cultured atop tissue culture dishes coated with matrilin-2. Various formulations of chitosan vs matrilin-2 in scaffold constructs were examined with scanning electron microscopy. The effect of the matrilin-2/chitosan scaffold on SC migration in the collagen conduits was determined by capillary migration assays. Neuronal adhesion and axonal outgrowth were evaluated with three-dimensional (3D) organotypic assay of dorsal root ganglions (DRG). DRG axonal outgrowth within the scaffolds was determined by immunofluorescence staining of neurofilaments. Results: Matrilin-2 induced SC migration and enhanced its adhesion. A formulation of 2% chitosan with matrilin-2 demonstrated an optimal 3D porous architecture for SC interaction. Matrilin-2/chitosan scaffold enabled SCs to migrate against gravity within conduits. Chemical modification of chitosan with lysine (K-chitosan) further improved DRG adhesion and axonal outgrowth than the matrilin-2/chitosan scaffold without lysine modification. Conclusion: We developed a matrilin-2/K-chitosan scaffold to mimic extracellular matrix cues and provide a porous matrix to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. Taking advantage of matrilin-2's capability to stimulate SC migration and adhesion, we formulated a porous matrilin-2/chitosan scaffold to support axongal outgrowth. Chemical modification of chitosan with lysine further improved matrilin-2 bioactivity in the 3D scaffold. The 3D porous matrilin-2/K-chitosan scaffolds have high potential for enhancing nerve repair by stimulating SC migration, neuronal adhesion, and axonal outgrowth.

Acellular Nerve Allografts in Major Peripheral Nerve Repairs: An Analysis of Cases Presenting With Limited Recovery

BACKGROUND

Acellular nerve allografts have been used successfully and with increasing frequency to reconstruct nerve injuries. As their use has been expanded to treat longer gap, larger diameter nerve injuries, some failed cases have been reported. We present the histomorphometry of 5 such cases illustrating these limitations and review the current literature of acellular nerve allografts.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2019, 5 patients with iatrogenic nerve injuries to the median or ulnar nerve reconstructed with an AxoGen AVANCE nerve allograft at an outside hospital were treated in our center with allograft excision and alternative reconstruction. These patients had no clinical or electrophysiological evidence of recovery, and allograft specimens at the time of surgery were sent for histomorphological examination.

RESULTS

Three patients with a median and 2 with ulnar nerve injury were included. Histology demonstrated myelinated axons present in all proximal native nerve specimens. In 2 cases, axons failed to regenerate into the allograft and in 3 cases, axonal regeneration diminished or terminated within the allograft.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported cases demonstrate the importance of evaluating the length and the function of nerves undergoing acellular nerve allograft repair. In long length, large-diameter nerves, the use of acellular nerve allografts should be carefully considered.

Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries of the Upper Extremity: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Iatrogenic nerve injuries may occur after any intervention of the upper extremity.

»

Causes of iatrogenic nerve lesions include direct sharp or thermal injury, retraction, compression from implants or compartment syndrome, injection, patient positioning, radiation, and cast/splint application, among others.

»

Optimal treatment of iatrogenic peripheral nerve lesions relies on early and accurate diagnosis.

»

Advanced imaging modalities (e.g., ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging) and electrodiagnostic studies aid and assist in preoperative planning.

»

Optimal treatment of iatrogenic injuries is situation-dependent and depends on the feasibility of direct repair, grafting, and functional transfers.

Local delivery of FK506 to a nerve allograft is comparable to systemic delivery at suppressing allogeneic graft rejection

The objective of this study was to determine if locally delivered FK506 could prevent allogeneic nerve graft rejection long enough to allow axon regeneration to pass through the nerve graft. An 8mm mouse sciatic nerve gap injury repaired with a nerve allograft was used to assess the effectiveness of local FK506 immunosuppressive therapy. FK506-loaded poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) nerve conduits were used to provide sustained local FK506 delivery to nerve allografts. Continuous and temporary systemic FK506 therapy to nerve allografts, and autograft repair were used as control groups. Serial assessment of inflammatory cell and CD4+ cell infiltration into the nerve graft tissue was performed to characterize the immune response over time. Nerve regeneration and functional recovery was serially assessed by nerve histomorphometry, gastrocnemius muscle mass recovery, and the ladder rung skilled locomotion assay. At the end of the study, week 16, all the groups had similar levels of inflammatory cell infiltration. The local FK506 and continuous systemic FK506 groups had similar levels of CD4+ cell infiltration, however, it was significantly greater than the autograft control. In terms of nerve histmorphometry, the local FK506 and continunous systemic FK506 groups had similar amounts of myelinated axons, although they were significantly lower than the autograft and temporary systemic FK506 group. The autograft had significantly greater muscle mass recovery than all the other groups. In the ladder rung assay, the autograft, local FK506, and continuous systemic FK506 had similar levels of skilled locomotion performance, whereas the temporary systemic FK506 group had significanty better performance than all the other groups. The results of this study suggest that local delivery of FK506 can provide comparable immunosuppression and nerve regeneration outcomes as systemically delivered FK506.

Donors for nerve transplantation in craniofacial soft tissue injuries

Neural tissue is an important soft tissue; for instance, craniofacial nerves govern several aspects of human behavior, including the expression of speech, emotion transmission, sensation, and motor function. Therefore, nerve repair to promote functional recovery after craniofacial soft tissue injuries is indispensable. However, the repair and regeneration of craniofacial nerves are challenging due to their intricate anatomical and physiological characteristics. Currently, nerve transplantation is an irreplaceable treatment for segmental nerve defects. With the development of emerging technologies, transplantation donors have become more diverse. The present article reviews the traditional and emerging alternative materials aimed at advancing cutting-edge research on craniofacial nerve repair and facilitating the transition from the laboratory to the clinic. It also provides a reference for donor selection for nerve repair after clinical craniofacial soft tissue injuries. We found that autografts are still widely accepted as the first options for segmental nerve defects. However, allogeneic composite functional units have a strong advantage for nerve transplantation for nerve defects accompanied by several tissue damages or loss. As an alternative to autografts, decellularized tissue has attracted increasing attention because of its low immunogenicity. Nerve conduits have been developed from traditional autologous tissue to composite conduits based on various synthetic materials, with developments in tissue engineering technology. Nerve conduits have great potential to replace traditional donors because their structures are more consistent with the physiological microenvironment and show self-regulation performance with improvements in 3D technology. New materials, such as hydrogels and nanomaterials, have attracted increasing attention in the biomedical field. Their biocompatibility and stimuli-responsiveness have been gradually explored by researchers in the regeneration and regulation of neural networks.

Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations

The use of autografted nerve in surgical repair of peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) is severely limited due to donor site morbidity and restricted tissue availability. As an alternative, synthetic nerve guidance channels (NGCs) are available on the market for surgical nerve repair, but they fail to promote nerve regeneration across larger critical gap nerve injuries. Therefore, such injuries remain unaddressed, result in poor healing outcomes and are a limiting factor in limb reconstruction and transplantation. On the other hand, a myriad of advanced biomaterial strategies to address critical nerve injuries are proposed in preclinical literature but only few of those have found their way into clinical practice. The design of synthetic nerve grafts should follow rational criteria and make use of a combination of bioinstructive cues to actively promote nerve regeneration. To identify the most promising NGC designs for translation into applicable products, thorough mode of action studies, standardized readouts and validation in large animals are needed. We identify design criteria for NGC fabrication according to the current state of research, give a broad overview of bioactive and functionalized biomaterials and highlight emerging composite implant strategies using therapeutic cells, soluble factors, structural features and intrinsically conductive substrates. Finally, we discuss translational progress in bioartificial conduits for nerve repair from the surgeon’s perspective and give an outlook toward future challenges in the field.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries

Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBIs) are typically traction type injuries to the newborn that occur during the delivery process. Although the incidence of these injuries has overall decreased from 1.5 to around 0.9 per 1000 live births in the United States over the past 2 decades, these injuries remain common, with incidence holding fairly steady from 2008 to 2014. Shoulder dystocia is the strongest identified risk factor, imparting a 100-fold greater risk. The newborn's shoulder is caught behind the mother's pubic bone, and traction performed on the child during delivery results in injury to the brachial plexus. Other risk factors associated with BPBI include macrosomia (birthweight > 4.5 kg), heavy for gestational age infants, birth hypoxia, gestational diabetes, and forceps or vacuum-assisted delivery. Breech presentation has also been described as a risk factor in the past, but there have been more recent data that challenge this association.

[Use of acellular allogeneic nerve transplants for nerve defects of the hand : Experience from a German hand surgery center]

Peripheral nerve injuries are often encountered in traumatological care. The aim of this manuscript is to provide initial data, experiences and performance reports from Germany in the implantation of acellular human nerve transplants in peripheral sensory nerve defects of the hand and to put these data in the context of a comprehensive review of the literature. Of the patients 4 (7 digital nerves) were examined 6 months postoperatively and 5 patients (6 digital nerves) were examined 1 year after the operation (3 were also at the 6‑month examination). All patients had a clinical improvement after nerve reconstruction (≥ S3 according to the classification of sensory recovery of the Medical Research Council modified by Mackinnon and Dellon). Disadvantages of our clinical study are the small number of patients, the inhomogeneity (primary and secondary nerve reconstruction) and the lack of comparison with other nerve reconstruction methods.

Comparison of Collagen and Human Amniotic Membrane Nerve Wraps and Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Repair in Preclinical Models: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

 Collagen and human amniotic membrane (hAM) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomaterials that can be used as nerve wraps or conduits for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Both biomaterials have been shown to reduce scarring and fibrosis of injured peripheral nerves. However, comparative advantages and disadvantages have not been definitively shown in the literature. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively evaluate the literature regarding the roles of hAM and collagen nerve wraps and conduits on peripheral nerve regeneration in preclinical models.

METHODS

 The MEDLINE database was queried using the PubMed search engine on July 7, 2019, with the following search strategy: ("amniotic membrane" OR "amnion") OR ("collagen conduit" OR "nerve wrap")] AND "nerve." All resulting articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Nerve type, lesion type/injury model, repair type, treatment, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

 Two hundred and fifty-eight articles were identified, and 44 studies remained after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seventeen studies utilized hAM, whereas 27 studies utilized collagen wraps or conduits. Twenty-three (85%) of the collagen studies utilized conduits, and four (15%) utilized wraps. Six (35%) of the hAM studies utilized conduits and 11 (65%) utilized wraps. Two (9%) collagen studies involving a conduit and one (25%) involving a wrap demonstrated at least one significant improvement in outcomes compared with a control. While none of the hAM conduit studies showed significant improvements, eight (73%) of the studies investigating hAM wraps showed at least one significant improvement in outcomes.

CONCLUSION

 The majority of studies reported positive outcomes, indicating that collagen and hAM nerve wraps and conduits both have the potential to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. However, relatively few studies reported significant findings, except for studies evaluating hAM wraps. Preclinical models may help guide clinical practice regarding applications of these biomaterials in peripheral nerve repair.

A Retrospective Case Series of Peripheral Mixed Nerve Reconstruction Failures Using Processed Nerve Allografts

BACKGROUND

Favorable rates of meaningful recovery (≥M3/S3) of processed nerve allografts (PNAs) for mixed and motor nerve injuries have been reported, but there are few reports of patients having complete PNA failure (M0/S0). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes, including rate of complete failures, in a case series of patients who underwent PNA for peripheral mixed nerve reconstructions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of outcomes between May 2018 to September 2020 was performed. Consecutive patients who underwent nerve reconstruction (>15 mm) with PNA for a peripheral mixed nerve injury of the upper or lower extremity were eligible. Those who returned to clinic for a 10-month postoperative visit were included in this study. The primary outcome was whether the patient was defined as having a complete failure (M0/S0).

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients underwent a PNA during the time period; 14 patients participated in follow-up and were included (average age: 34.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 11.9 months. The average gap length was 46.4 mm (range 15-110 mm). At their 10-month postoperative visit, no patients had any motor or sensory improvement; all patients were deemed as having complete failure. Four patients underwent or were planned for subsequent revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated a high number of complete failures, with all 14 included patients sustaining a complete failure (100% failure rate) at a minimum 10-month follow-up visit. Failure in this case series was not observed to affect one nerve type, location, or be related to preoperative injury size.

Functional Outcomes of Nerve Allografts Seeded with Undifferentiated and Differentiated Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Defect Model

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stem cells have the potential to produce neurotrophic growth factors and establish a supportive microenvironment for neural regeneration. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of undifferentiated and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells dynamically seeded onto decellularized nerve allografts on functional outcomes when used in peripheral nerve repair.

METHODS

In 80 Lewis rats, a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was reconstructed with (1) autograft, (2) decellularized allograft, (3) decellularized allograft seeded with undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells, or (4) decellularized allograft seeded with mesenchymal stem cells differentiated into Schwann cell-like cells. Nerve regeneration was evaluated over time by cross-sectional tibial muscle ultrasound measurements, and at 12 and 16 weeks by isometric tetanic force measurements, compound muscle action potentials, muscle mass, histology, and immunofluorescence analyses.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved isometric tetanic force measurement and compound muscle action potential outcomes compared to decellularized allograft alone, whereas differentiated mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved compound muscle action potential outcomes. The autografts outperformed both stem cell groups histologically at 12 weeks. At 16 weeks, functional outcomes normalized between groups. At both time points, the effect of undifferentiated versus differentiated mesenchymal stem cells was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Undifferentiated and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved functional outcomes of decellularized allografts at 12 weeks and were similar to autograft results in the majority of measurements. At 16 weeks, outcomes normalized as expected. Although differences between both cell types were not statistically significant, undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells improved functional outcomes of decellularized nerve allografts to a greater extent and had practical benefits for clinical translation by limiting preparation time and costs.

Administration of Purified Exosome Product in a Rat Sciatic Serve Reverse Autograft Model

BACKGROUND

The nerve autograft remains the gold standard when reconstructing peripheral nerve defects. However, although autograft repair can result in useful functional recovery, poor outcomes are common, and better treatments are needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of purified exosome product on functional motor recovery and nerve-related gene expression in a rat sciatic nerve reverse autograft model.

METHODS

Ninety-six Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three experimental groups. In each group, a unilateral 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was created. The excised nerve was reversed and used to reconstruct the defect. Group I animals received the reversed autograft alone, group II animals received the reversed autograft with fibrin glue, and group III animals received the reversed autograft with purified exosome product suspended in the fibrin glue. The animals were killed at 3 and 7 days and 12 and 16 weeks after surgery. Evaluation included compound muscle action potentials, isometric tetanic force, tibialis anterior muscle wet weight, nerve regeneration-related gene expression, and nerve histomorphometry.

RESULTS

At 16 weeks, isometric tetanic force was significantly better in group III (p = 0.03). The average axon diameter of the peroneal nerve was significantly larger in group III at both 12 and 16 weeks (p = 0.015 at 12 weeks; p < 0.01 at 16 weeks). GAP43 and S100b gene expression was significantly up-regulated by purified exosome product.

CONCLUSIONS

Local administration of purified exosome product demonstrated improved nerve regeneration profiles in the reverse sciatic nerve autograft rat model. Thus, purified exosome product may have beneficial effects on nerve regeneration, gene profiles, and motor outcomes.

Surgical Angiogenesis of Decellularized Nerve Allografts Improves Early Functional Recovery in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Defect Model

BACKGROUND

Surgical angiogenesis applied to nerve grafts has been suggested to enhance nerve regeneration after nerve injury. The authors hypothesized that surgical angiogenesis to decellularized nerve allografts would improve functional recovery in a rat sciatic nerve defect model.

METHODS

Sixty Lewis rats were divided in three groups of 20 animals each. Unilateral sciatic nerve defects were repaired with (1) autografts, (2) decellularized allografts, and (3) decellularized allografts wrapped with a superficial inferior epigastric artery fascial flap to add surgical angiogenesis. Twelve and 16 weeks after surgery, nerve regeneration was assessed using functional, electrophysiologic, histologic, and immunofluorescence analyses. Ultrasonography was used during the survival period to noninvasively evaluate muscle atrophy and reinnervation by measuring cross-sectional muscle area.

RESULTS

Surgical angiogenesis of allografts demonstrated significantly improved isometric tetanic force recovery at 12 weeks, compared to allograft alone, which normalized between groups at 16 weeks. Cross-sectional muscle areas showed no differences between groups. Electrophysiology showed superiority of autografts at both time points. No differences were found in histologic analysis, besides a significantly inferior N ratio in allografts at 12 weeks. Immunofluorescent expression of CD34, indicating vascularity, was significantly enhanced in the superficial inferior epigastric artery fascial group compared to allografts at 12 weeks, with highest expression at 16 weeks compared to all groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgical angiogenesis with an adipofascial flap to the nerve allograft increases vascularity in the nerve graft, with subsequent improvement of early muscle force recovery, comparable to autografts.

Peripheral Nerve Basic Science Research-What Is Important for Hand Surgeons to Know?

Peripheral nerve injury and regeneration continue to be extensively studied through basic science research using animal models. A translational gap remains between basic science research and clinical application. The importance of peripheral nerve regeneration in basic science research depends on the design of the study, the outcome measures, and the time of regeneration selected. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the importance of the design and outcome measures of peripheral nerve basic science research, for hand surgeons to understand for potential clinical translation.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

»

The incidence of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) in the United States is declining and now occurs in <1 per 1,000 births.

»

The gold standard for predicting the need for early intervention remains serial examination.

»

Early treatment of BPBI with reconstructive surgery requires the ability to perform both interposition nerve grafting and nerve transfers.

»

Given the heterogeneity of lesions, the evidence is largely limited to retrospective comparative studies and case series.

Effect of Tacrolimus on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration in Allograft Transplantation: A Light and Electron Microscopic Study

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral nerve injuries are common in Europe; however, the treatment techniques may lead to disabilities. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tacrolimus use on the capacity of the epineural sheath graft to improve its regeneration quality in rat sciatic nerves as a treatment option for nerve injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the experimental process, 30 male Sprague Dawley were used as recipients and 10 Wistar rats were used as donors. Under anesthesia, all rats were operated on to resect the sciatic nerve. The nerve tissue of Wistar rats was used as allograft. In the autograft group, the resected nerve was reversed and sutured, resulting in an epineural sheath graft. For the allograft groups, rats were randomly divided into 2 groups as the tacrolimus-treated group and the nontreated group after allograft transplant. Tacrolimus was administered intramuscularly at 0.1 mg/kg daily for 12 weeks. After the treatment period, rats were killed and evaluated histomorphologically with light and electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Histological examination showed no remarkable differences between different regions of the sciatic nerves (distal, middle, and proximal). The axonal density was decreased in the allograft groups compared with the autograft group (P < .001). Results showed that the number of mast cells was increased in the allograft group without tacrolimus treatment (P < .05). Similarly, there was a mild increase in mast cell count in the tacrolimus-treated allograft group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that tacrolimus use in rats with implanted epineural nerve sheath supported recovery in terms of morphological and physiological regeneration of the nerve.

Bioabsorbable nerve conduits three-dimensionally coated with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem/progenitor cells promote peripheral nerve regeneration in rats

Peripheral nerve regeneration using nerve conduits has been less effective than autogenous nerve grafts. To overcome this hurdle, we developed a tissue-engineered nerve conduit coated with mouse induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurospheres, for the first time, which accelerated nerve regeneration in mice. We previously demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes of this hybrid nerve conduit for mouse peripheral nerve regeneration. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic potential of nerve conduits coated with human iPSC (hiPSC)-derived neurospheres in rat sciatic nerve defects, as a translational preclinical study. The hiPSC-derived quaternary neurospheres containing neural stem/progenitor cells were three-dimensionally cultured within the nerve conduit (poly l-lactide and polycaprolactone copolymer) for 14 days. Complete 5-mm defects were created as a small size peripheral nerve defect in sciatic nerves of athymic nude rats and reconstructed with nerve conduit alone (control group), nerve conduits coated with hiPSC-derived neurospheres (iPS group), and autogenous nerve grafts (autograft group) (n = 8 per group). The survival of the iPSC-derived neurospheres was continuously tracked using in vivo imaging. At 12 weeks postoperatively, motor and sensory function and histological nerve regeneration were evaluated. Before implantation, the hiPSC-derived quaternary neurospheres that three-dimensional coated the nerve conduit were differentiated into Schwann-like cells. The transplanted hiPSC-derived neurospheres survived for at least 56 days after implantation. The iPS group showed non-significance higher sensory regeneration than the autograft group. Although there was no actual motor functional nerve regeneration in the three groups: control, iPS, and autograft groups, the motor function in the iPS group recovered significantly better than that in the control group, but it did not recover to the same level as that in the autograft group. Histologically, the iPS group demonstrated significantly higher axon numbers and areas, and lower G-ratio values than the control group, whereas the autograft group demonstrated the highest axon numbers and areas and the lowest G-ratio values. Nerve conduit three-dimensionally coated with hiPSC-derived neurospheres promoted axonal regeneration and functional recovery in repairing rat sciatic nerve small size defects. Transplantation of hiPSC-derived neurospheres with nerve conduits is a promising clinical iPSC-based cell therapy for the treatment of peripheral nerve defects.

A Quick and Reliable Method to Decellularize a Gracilis Flap: A Crucial Step Toward Building a Muscle

INTRODUCTION

Tissue loss as a consequence of congenital anomalies, trauma, malignancy, or gangrene represents a major health care problem in the United States. Because younger individuals are disproportionately affected, the costs are magnified over time and the resultant individual and societal effects are tremendous. The currently available options to restore soft tissue defects are associated with donor site morbidities. Vascularized composite allotransplantation may provide form, function, and esthetics without a donor site; however, it comes with the significant risk associated with toxic immunosuppression (Biomaterials. 2015;61:246-256, Ann Plast Surg. 2015;75(1):112-116, Transplantation. 2009;88(2):203-210). Engineered tissues offer promise in finding viable alternatives to allograft and autologous tissues. In this study, we present our simple and quick method to decellularize a muscle without disrupting the vascular network integrity or the extracellular matrix. Optimizing the decellularization process is a crucial step toward creating an "off-the-shelf" flap that can be used for soft tissue reconstruction.

METHODS

The superficial gracilis muscle of 20 rats were harvested on their circulation and decellularized using perfusion with Krebs-Henseleit buffer and sodium dodecyl sulfate for 6 hours. These flaps were evaluated by gross morphology, histology, DNA quantification, integrity of the vascular network, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

All samples were decellularized successfully as determined by DNA content and histological analysis for cellular content. The vascular network was preserved in all samples.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a quick, simple, and affordable method to decellularize a muscle flap through the vascular network. Our proposed method is efficient and can be completed in a significantly shorter time when compared with other methods. It is also safe and does not affect integrity of tissue, and this is essential for a reliable recellularization.

Implantation of Acellular Nerve Allograft Using Nerve Connectors

Background: Nerve connectors are short nerve conduits used to approximate nerve ends. Acellular nerve allografts are viable alternatives when direct repair is not possible but do not produce exudate essential for fibrin clot formation. We hypothesize that acellular nerve allograft implanted using nerve connectors must have end-to-end contact with the in situ nerve stumps to support nerve regeneration. Methods: Sixty Sprague Dawley rats underwent a 14-mm unilateral tibial nerve injury and subsequent repair using various combinations of acellular nerve grafts and nerve connectors. Proximal repairs for all groups utilized direct contact with the nerve stump within connector. Variations in distal repair methods (allograft length, nerve gap, and connector length) defined our 4 groups-group A: 14 mm allograft, no distal gap, and distal connector; group B: 11.5 mm allograft, 2.5 mm distal gap, and distal connector; group C: 9 mm allograft, 5 mm distal gap, and distal connector; group D: 14 mm allograft, no distal gap, and no distal connector. At 3 months post-repair, function and histomorphology were assessed. Results: Developed muscle force was significantly lower in group C (0.073 ± 0.077 N) compared with the other 3 groups (group A = 0.529 ± 0.312 N, group B = 0.461 ± 0.462 N, and group D = 0.409 ± 0.327 N). Axon counts were significantly lower in group C (2121 ± 389) compared with group A (6401 ± 855), group B (4710 ± 755), and group D (4450 ± 126). There was no statistically significant difference in G-ratios (myelination) between groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Nerve regeneration was significantly impaired as the gap distance between the distal end of the allograft and the distal nerve stump increased to 5 mm.

Functional Outcome after Reconstruction of a Long Nerve Gap in Rabbits Using Optimized Decellularized Nerve Allografts

BACKGROUND

Processed nerve allografts are a promising alternative to nerve autografts, providing an unlimited, readily available supply and avoiding donor-site morbidity and the need for immunosuppression. Currently, clinically available nerve allografts do not provide satisfactory results for motor reconstruction. This study evaluated motor recovery after reconstruction of a long nerve gap using a processed nerve allograft and the influence of storage techniques.

METHODS

Nerve allografts were decellularized using elastase and detergents and stored at either 4° or -80°C. In 36 New Zealand White rabbits, a 3-cm peroneal nerve gap was repaired with either an autograft (group 1, control) or a cold-stored (group 2) or frozen-stored (group 3) processed nerve allograft. Nerve recovery was evaluated using longitudinal ultrasound measurements, electrophysiology (compound muscle action potentials), isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and histomorphometry after 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Longitudinal ultrasound measurements showed that the cold-stored allograft provided earlier regeneration than the frozen-stored allograft. Furthermore, ultrasound showed significantly inferior recovery in group 3 than in both other groups (p < 0.05). Muscle weight and isometric tetanic force showed similar outcomes in the autograft and cold-stored allograft groups [p = 0.096 (muscle weight) and p = 0.286 (isometric tetanic force)], and confirmed the inferiority of the frozen-stored allograft to the autograft [p < 0.01 (muscle weight) and p = 0.02 (isometric tetanic force)].

CONCLUSIONS

Frozen storage of the nerve allograft significantly impairs functional recovery and should be avoided. The cold-stored optimized nerve allograft yields functional recovery similar to the gold standard autograft in the reconstruction of a 3-cm motor nerve defect. Future studies should focus on further improvement of the nerve allograft.

Detergent-based decellularized peripheral nerve allografts: An in vivo preclinical study in the rat sciatic nerve injury model

Nerve autograft is the gold standard technique to repair critical nerve defects, but efficient alternatives are needed. The present study evaluated the suitability of our novel Roosens-based (RSN) decellularized peripheral nerve allografts (DPNAs) in the repair of 10-mm sciatic nerve defect in rats at the functional and histological levels after 12 weeks. These DPNAs were compared with the autograft technique (AUTO) and Sondell (SD) or Hudson (HD) based DPNAs. Clinical and functional assessments demonstrated a partial regeneration in all operated animals. RSN-based DPNAs results were comparable with SD and HD groups and closely comparable with the AUTO group without significant differences (p > .05). Overall hematological studies confirmed the biocompatibility of grafted DPNAs. In addition, biochemistry revealed some signs of muscle affection in all operated animals. These results were confirmed by the loss of weight and volume of the muscle and by muscle histology, especially in DPNAs. Histology of repaired nerves confirmed an active nerve tissue regeneration and partial myelination along with the implanted grafts, being the results obtained with HD and RSN-based DPNAs comparable with the AUTO group. Finally, this in vivo study suggests that our novel RSN-based DPNAs supported a comparable tissue regeneration, along the 10-mm nerve gap, after 12-week follow-up to HD DPNAs, and both were superior to SD group and closely comparable with autograft technique. However, further improvements are needed to overcome the efficacy of the nerve autograft technique.

Restoration of Neurological Function Following Peripheral Nerve Trauma

Following peripheral nerve trauma that damages a length of the nerve, recovery of function is generally limited. This is because no material tested for bridging nerve gaps promotes good axon regeneration across the gap under conditions associated with common nerve traumas. While many materials have been tested, sensory nerve grafts remain the clinical “gold standard” technique. This is despite the significant limitations in the conditions under which they restore function. Thus, they induce reliable and good recovery only for patients < 25 years old, when gaps are <2 cm in length, and when repairs are performed <2–3 months post trauma. Repairs performed when these values are larger result in a precipitous decrease in neurological recovery. Further, when patients have more than one parameter larger than these values, there is normally no functional recovery. Clinically, there has been little progress in developing new techniques that increase the level of functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury. This paper examines the efficacies and limitations of sensory nerve grafts and various other techniques used to induce functional neurological recovery, and how these might be improved to induce more extensive functional recovery. It also discusses preliminary data from the clinical application of a novel technique that restores neurological function across long nerve gaps, when repairs are performed at long times post-trauma, and in older patients, even under all three of these conditions. Thus, it appears that function can be restored under conditions where sensory nerve grafts are not effective.

Combination of Electrospun Nanofiber Sheet Incorporating Methylcobalamin and PGA-Collagen Tube for Treatment of a Sciatic Nerve Defect in a Rat Model

BACKGROUND

For peripheral nerve defects, autografting is considered the therapeutic gold-standard treatment. However, this procedure leads to donor-site morbidity. While various artificial conduits have been recently developed, treatment outcome has been demonstrated to be poorer than that with autograft. In our previous study using a rat sciatic nerve crush injury model, we demonstrated that the delivery of electrospun nanofiber sheets incorporating methylcobalamin (MeCbl sheet) to the local site of a peripheral nerve injury promoted peripheral nerve regeneration. In this study, we examined the effects of combination therapy using an MeCbl sheet and a polyglycolic acid tube filled with collagen sponge (PGA-c) in a rat model of a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect.

METHODS

The rats were divided into 4 groups: (1) sham group (n = 10); (2) PGA-c group (n = 9), in which the gap was bridged using a PGA-c; (3) PGA-c/Sheet group (n = 8), in which the gap was bridged using a PGA-c wrapped in an MeCbl sheet; and (4) autograft group (n = 10), in which the gap was bridged using a reversed autograft. Motor and sensory function were evaluated, electrophysiological analysis was performed, and histomorphological findings were analyzed at 12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Compared with the PGA-c group, the PGA-c/Sheet group demonstrated significant improvements in the paw-withdrawal threshold expressed as a ratio relative to the contralateral side (mean difference [MD], -1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.64 to -0.38), terminal latency (MD, -0.86 ms; 95% CI, -1.56 to -0.16 ms), myelinated axon area (MD, 4.97%; 95% CI, 0.14% to 9.80%), proportion of myelinated axons (MD, 8.453%; 95% CI, 0.001% to 16.905%), and g-ratio (MD, -0.018; 95% CI, -0.035 to -0.001). No significant improvements were observed regarding motor function, electrophysiological findings with the exception of terminal latency, and axon numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

An MeCbl sheet in combination with a PGA-c significantly accelerated recovery with respect to sensory function, electrophysiology, and histomorphometry.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An MeCbl sheet may represent an effective therapeutic strategy for promoting regeneration across a nerve gap bridged with an artificial conduit.

Advances in the repair of segmental nerve injuries and trends in reconstruction

Despite advances in surgery, the reconstruction of segmental nerve injuries continues to pose challenges. In this review, current neurobiology regarding regeneration across a nerve defect is discussed in detail. Recent findings include the complex roles of nonneuronal cells in nerve defect regeneration, such as the role of the innate immune system in angiogenesis and how Schwann cells migrate within the defect. Clinically, the repair of nerve defects is still best served by using nerve autografts with the exception of small, noncritical sensory nerve defects, which can be repaired using autograft alternatives, such as processed or acellular nerve allografts. Given current clinical limits for when alternatives can be used, advanced solutions to repair nerve defects demonstrated in animals are highlighted. These highlights include alternatives designed with novel topology and materials, delivery of drugs specifically known to accelerate axon growth, and greater attention to the role of the immune system.

Long Segment, Mixed Sensorimotor Nerve Reconstruction with Allograft: A Case Report of High Radial Nerve Injury

CASE

A 35-year-old man sustained a Grade I open right mid-diaphyseal humerus fracture and high radial nerve transection from a motor vehicle accident. Acute humeral plate osteosynthesis and radial nerve reconstruction using an intercalary 4-cm processed nerve allograft (PNA) was performed. Five years postoperatively, elbow extension, forearm supination, and wrist extension were 5/5 strength and independent digital extension was 5-/5. Radial nerve sensation recovered to 90% of the uninjured side.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PNA resulted in outcomes comparable with or superior to autograft reconstruction or secondary tendon transfers and is a reasonable reconstructive option for similar acute, mixed sensorimotor nerve injuries.

Side-to-side supercharging nerve allograft enhances neurotrophic potential

INTRODUCTION

Critical limitations of processed acellular nerve allograft (PNA) are linked to Schwann cell function. Side-to-side bridge grafting may enhance PNA neurotrophic potential.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats underwent tibial nerve transection and immediate repair with 20-mm PNA (n = 33) or isograft (ISO; n = 9) or 40-mm PNA (n = 33) or ISO (n = 9). Processed acellular nerve allograft groups received zero, one, or three side-to-side bridge grafts between the peroneal nerve and graft. Muscle weight, force generation, and nerve histomorphology were tested 20 weeks after repair. Selected animals underwent neuron back labeling with fluorescent dyes.

RESULTS

Inner axon diameters, g-ratios, and axon counts were smaller in the distal vs proximal aspect of each graft (P < .05). Schwann cell counts were greater, with a lower proportion of senescent cells for groups with bridges (P < .05). Retrograde labeling demonstrated that 6.6% to 17.7% of reinnervating neurons were from the peroneal pool.

DISCUSSION

Bridge grafting positively influenced muscle recovery and Schwann cell counts and senescence after long PNA nerve reconstruction.

Gene expression profiles of differentiated and undifferentiated adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells dynamically seeded onto a processed nerve allograft

BACKGROUND

Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into Schwann-like cells onto processed nerve allografts may support peripheral nerve repair. The purpose of this study was to understand the biological characteristics of undifferentiated and differentiated MSCs before and after seeding onto a processed nerve allograft by comparing gene expression profiles.

METHODS

MSCs from Lewis rats were cultured in maintenance media or differentiated into Schwann-like cells. Both treatment groups were dynamically seeded onto decellularized nerve allografts derived from Sprague-Dawley rats. Gene expression was quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of representative biomarkers, including neurotrophic (GDNF, PTN, GAP43, PMP22), angiogenic (CD31, VEGF1), extracellular matrix (ECM) (COL1A1, COL3A1, FBLN1, LAMB2) or cell cycle (CAPS3, CCBN2) genes. Gene expression values were statistically evaluated using a 2-factor ANOVA with repeated measures.

RESULTS

Baseline gene expression of undifferentiated and differentiated MSCs was significantly altered upon interaction with processed nerve allografts. Interaction between processed allografts and undifferentiated MSCs enhanced expression of neurotrophic (NGF, GDNF, PMP22), ECM (FBLN1, LAMB2) and regulatory cell cycle genes (CCNB2) during a 7-day time course. Interactions of differentiated MSCs with nerve allografts enhanced expression of neurotrophic (NGF, GDNF, GAP43), angiogenic (VEGF1), ECM (FBLN1) and regulatory cell cycle genes (CASP3, CCNB2) within one week.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic seeding onto processed nerve allografts modulates temporal gene expression profiles of differentiated and undifferentiated MSCs. These changes in gene expressions may support the reparative functions of MSCs in supporting nerve regeneration in different stages of axonal growth.

A novel mouse model of contralateral C7 transfer via the pretracheal route: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer (contralateral C7 transfer) is a novel treatment for patients with spastic paralysis, including stroke and traumatic brain injury. However, little is known on changes in plasticity that occur in the intact hemisphere after C7 transfer. An appropriate surgical model is required.

NEW METHOD

We described in detail the anatomy of the C7 in a mouse model. We designed a pretracheal route by excising the contralateral C6 lamina ventralis, and the largest nerve defect necessary for direct neurorrhaphy was compared with defect lengths in a prespinal route. To test feasibility, we performed in-vivo surgery and assessed nerve regeneration by immunofluorescence, histology, electrophysiology, and behavioral examinations.

RESULTS

Two types of branching were found in the anterior and posterior divisions of C7, both of which were significantly larger than the sural nerve. The length of the nerve defect was drastically reduced after contralateral C6 lamina ventralis excision. Direct tension-free neurorrhaphy was achieved in 66.7% of mice. The expression of neurofilament in the distal segment of the regenerated C7 increased. Histological examination revealed remyelination. Behavioral tests and electrophysiology tests showed functional recovery in a traumatic brain injury mouse.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

This is the first direct tension-free neurorrhaphy mouse model of contralateral C7 transfer which shortened the time of nerve regeneration; previous models have used nerve grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper describes a simple, reproducible, and effective mouse model of contralateral C7 transfer for studying brain plasticity and exploring potential new therapies after unilateral cerebral injury.

Brachial plexus nerve injury and repair in a rabbit model part II: Does middle trunk injury result in loss of biceps function while repair results in recovery of biceps function

INTRODUCTION

There is conflicting anatomic and innervation data regarding the rabbit brachial plexus injury model. This study aims to validate a rabbit brachial plexus injury model. We hypothesize the middle trunk (C6, C7) is the primary innervation of the biceps, and when cut and unrepaired, would demonstrate lack of recovery and when repaired would demonstrate evidence of recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty two male New Zealand white rabbits (3-4 kg) underwent unilateral surgical division of the middle trunk. Five rabbits were randomly assigned to the "no-repair" group while the remaining 17 rabbits underwent direct coaptation ("repair" group). Rabbits were followed for 12 weeks, with ultrasound measurement of biceps cross-sectional area performed preoperatively, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. At a euthanasia procedure, bilateral compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and isometric tetanic force (ITF) were measured. Bilateral biceps muscles were harvested and wet muscle weight was recorded. The operative side was expressed as a percentage of the non-operated side, and differences between the no repair and repair rabbits were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The repair group demonstrated significantly higher CMA (23.3 vs. 0%, p < .05), ITF (25.6 vs. 0%, p < .05), and wet muscle weight (65.8 vs. 52.0%, p < .05) as compared to the unrepaired group. At 4 weeks postoperatively, ultrasound-measured cross-sectional area of the biceps demonstrated atrophy in both groups. At 12 weeks, the repair group had a significantly larger cross-sectional area as compared to the no-repair group (89.1 vs. 59.3%, p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This injury model demonstrated recovery with repair and lack of function without repair. Longer survival time is recommended for future investigations.

Decellularization techniques and their applications for the repair and regeneration of the nervous system

A variety of surgical and non-surgical approaches have been used to address the impacts of nervous system injuries, which can lead to either impairment or a complete loss of function for affected patients. The inherent ability of nervous tissues to repair and/or regenerate is dampened due to irreversible changes that occur within the tissue remodeling microenvironment following injury. Specifically, dysregulation of the extracellular matrix (i.e., scarring) has been suggested as one of the major factors that can directly impair normal cell function and could significantly alter the regenerative potential of these tissues. A number of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine-based approaches have been suggested to intervene in the process of remodeling which occurs following injury. Decellularization has become an increasingly popular technique used to obtain acellular scaffolds, and their derivatives (hydrogels, etc.), which retain tissue-specific components, including critical structural and functional proteins. These advantageous characteristics make this approach an intriguing option for creating materials capable of stimulating the sensitive repair mechanisms associated with nervous system injuries. Over the past decade, several diverse decellularization methods have been implemented specifically for nervous system applications in an attempt to carefully remove cellular content while preserving tissue morphology and composition. Each application-based decellularized ECM product requires carefully designed treatments that preserve the unique biochemical signatures associated within each tissue type to stimulate the repair of brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerve tissues. Herein, we review the decellularization techniques that have been applied to create biomaterials with the potential to promote the repair and regeneration of tissues within the central and peripheral nervous system.

A Comparison Between Two Collagen Nerve Conduits and Nerve Autograft: A Rat Model of Motor Nerve Regeneration

PURPOSE

To compare recovery in a rat model of sciatic nerve injury using a novel polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit, which contains collagen fibers within the tube, as compared with both a hollow collagen conduit and nerve autograft. We hypothesize that a conduit with a scaffold will provide improved nerve regeneration over hollow conduits and demonstrate no significant differences when compared with autograft.

METHODS

A total of 72 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into 3 experimental groups, in which a unilateral 10-mm sciatic defect was repaired using either nerve autograft, a hollow collagen conduit, or a PGA collagen-filled conduit. Outcomes were measured at 12 and 16 weeks after surgery, and included bilateral tibialis anterior muscle weight, voltage and force maximal contractility, assessment of ankle contracture, and nerve histology.

RESULTS

In all groups, outcomes improved between 12 and 16 weeks. On average, the autograft group outperformed both conduit groups, and the hollow conduit demonstrated improved outcomes when compared with the PGA collagen-filled conduit. Differences in contractile force, however, were significant only at 12 weeks (autograft > hollow collagen conduit > PGA collagen-filled conduit). At 16 weeks, contractile force demonstrated no significant difference but corroborated the same absolute results (autograft > hollow collagen conduit > PGA collagen-filled conduit).

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve repair using autograft provided superior motor nerve recovery over the 2 conduits for a 10-mm nerve gap in a murine acute transection injury model. The hollow collagen conduit demonstrated superior results when compared with the PGA collagen-filled conduit.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of a hollow collagen conduit provides superior motor nerve recovery as compared with a PGA collagen-filled conduit.

Direct muscle neurotization with long acellular nerve allograft: A case report

Nerve repair and nerve transfer are the optimal approaches to restore function to denervated muscle. When the distal-most portion of the nerve entering the muscle is compromised, these are not possible and direct muscle neurotization (DMN) is considered. We describe the first reported case of DMN with acellular nerve allograft. The patient is a 25 year old male who sustained a blast injury to the patient's proximal leg with segmental injury to the deep peroneal nerve resulting in complete foot drop with 0/5 dorsiflexion and toe extension. Given complete obliteration of the distal nerve, we performed direct neurotization of the tibialis anterior muscle with a 7 cm acellular nerve allograft coapted to the proximal stump of the deep peroneal nerve. At 3 years after surgery, the patient regained 5/5 strength with dorsiflexion and toe extension and normal gait. This case supports the use of acellular nerve allografts to restore function to denervated muscle when the distal nerve stump is not available for nerve repair or transfer and there is a desire to avoid the morbidity of autologous nerve graft harvest.

Adhesion, distribution, and migration of differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seeded on nerve allografts

BACKGROUND

Although undifferentiated MSCs and MSCs differentiated into Schwann-like cells have been extensively compared in vitro and in vivo, studies on the ability and efficiency of differentiated MSCs for delivery into nerve allografts are lacking. As this is essential for their clinical potential, the purpose of this study was to determine the ability of MSCs differentiated into Schwann-like cells to be dynamically seeded on decellularized nerve allografts and to compare their seeding potential to that of undifferentiated MSCs.

METHODS

Fifty-six sciatic nerve segments from Sprague Dawley rats were decellularized, and MSCs were harvested from Lewis rat adipose tissue. Control and differentiated MSCs were dynamically seeded on the surface of decellularized allografts. Cell viability, seeding efficiencies, cell adhesion, distribution, and migration were evaluated.

RESULTS

The viability of both cell types was not influenced by the processed nerve allograft. Both cell types achieved maximal seeding efficiency after 12 h of dynamic seeding, albeit that differentiated MSCs had a significantly higher mean seeding efficiency than control MSCs. Dynamic seeding resulted in a uniform distribution of cells among the surface of the nerve allograft. No cells were located inside the nerve allograft after seeding.

CONCLUSION

Differentiated MSCs can be dynamically seeded on the surface of a processed nerve allograft, in a similar fashion as undifferentiated MSCs. Schwann-like differentiated MSCs have a significantly higher seeding efficiency after 12 h of dynamic seeding. We conclude that differentiation of MSCs into Schwann-like cells may improve the seeding strategy and the ability of nerve allografts to support axon regeneration.

No Difference in Outcomes Detected Between Decellular Nerve Allograft and Cable Autograft in Rat Sciatic Nerve Defects

BACKGROUND

Nerve injuries with a gap/defect represent a clinical challenge without a clear solution. Reconstruction with cable autografts is a common treatment technique, and repair with decellular nerve allograft is a newer option. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of reconstruction with cable autografts with those of matched-diameter decellular nerve allografts to evaluate the relative importance of diameter as well as the autograft-versus-allograft nature of the reconstruction.

METHODS

A unilateral 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was created in 81 genetically identical male Lewis rats and then repaired with a reverse autograft, 4 or 5 sural nerve cable autografts, or a matched-diameter decellular nerve allograft. In each group, at each time point (12, 16, and 20 weeks), all 9 animals underwent functional testing and 5 of the 9 underwent histologic analysis. Functional testing included bilateral measurements of the isometric tetanic force of the tibialis anterior (primary outcome), the weight of the tibialis anterior, and the gastrocnemius compound muscle action potential (CMAP) latency. Histologic evaluation included an axon count as well as measurement of the axon density, fiber diameter, myelin thickness, and G-ratio.

RESULTS

The repair groups did not differ significantly in terms of isometric tetanic force, muscle weight, or CMAP latency, but these measurements did differ significantly according to the time after surgery (p < 0.05). The isometric tetanic force percent recovery (width of the 95% confidence interval) for the reverse autograft, cable autograft, and decellular nerve allograft was 57.7% (15.6%), 57.0% (23.4%), and 56.0% (19.7%), respectively, at 12 weeks; 69.1% (14.7%), 65.6% (18.5%), and 65.9% (29.1%) at 16 weeks; and 72.5% (18.2%), 73.7% (25.6%), and 71.8% (22.4%) at 20 weeks. Isometric tetanic force and muscle weight recovery were greater and CMAP latency was shorter at 20 and 16 weeks after surgery than they were at 12 weeks. The treatment type did not affect any of the histologic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this animal study, we found that matched-diameter decellular nerve allograft was not significantly different from reverse autograft or cable graft reconstruction in terms of function and histologic outcomes. These findings support decellular nerve allograft as a viable treatment option for nerve reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study showed that decellular nerve allograft was no different from cable or reverse autograft in terms of outcome measures in a rat sciatic nerve defect model. If these results are applicable clinically, it would obviate the need for autograft nerve harvest and its ensuing donor site morbidity.

Seeding decellularized nerve allografts with adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: An in vitro analysis of the gene expression and growth factors produced

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) secrete many soluble growth factors and have previously been shown to stimulate nerve regeneration. MSC-seeded processed nerve allografts could potentially be a promising method for large segmental motor nerve injuries. Further progress in our understanding of how the functions of MSCs can be leveraged for peripheral nerve repair is required before making clinical translation. The present study, therefore, investigated whether interactions of adipose-derived MSCs with decellularized nerve allografts can improve gene and protein expression of growth factors that may support nerve regeneration. Human nerve allografts (n = 30) were decellularized and seeded with undifferentiated human adipose-derived MSCs. Subsequently, the MSCs and MSC-seeded grafts were isolated on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 in culture for RNA expression analysis by qRT-PCR. Evaluated genes included NGF, BDNF, PTN, GAP43, MBP, PMP22, VEGF, and CD31. Growth factor production was evaluated and quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). On day 21, semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that adherence of MSCs to nerve allografts significantly enhances mRNA expression of neurotrophic, angiogenic, endothelial, and myelination markers (e.g., BDNF, VEGF, CD31, and MBP). ELISA results revealed an upregulation of BDNF and reduction of both VEGF and NGF protein levels. This study demonstrates that seeding of undifferentiated adipose-derived MSCs onto processed nerve allografts permits the secretion of neurotrophic and angiogenic factors that can stimulate nerve regeneration. These favorable molecular changes suggest that MSC supplementation of nerve allografts may have potential in improving nerve regeneration.

Collagen Nerve Conduits and Processed Nerve Allografts for the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Gaps: A Single-Institution Case Series and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

A single-institution case series is reported and a review of the literature on the outcomes of digital nerve gap reconstruction with the NeuraGen type 1 collagen nerve conduit (Integra Life Sciences, Plainsboro New Jersey, USA) and the Avance Nerve Graft (Axogen Inc., Alachua, Florida, USA) is presented.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients were included with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Primary outcome was postoperative sensory recovery measured by static 2-point discrimination test or the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test. Secondary outcome measurements were perioperative or postoperative complications. Final outcome data were stratified to grade results as excellent, good, or poor.

RESULTS

The mean nerve gap length was 14 ± 4.9 mm for the collagen conduits versus 18.4 ± 9.3 for nerve allografts. After 12 months, outcomes were graded as excellent sensory recovery in 48% of the collagen conduit repairs and 39% of the nerve allografts (P = 0.608), good in 26% of the conduits and 55% of the allografts (P = 0.074), and poor in 26% of the conduits versus 6% of the allografts (P = 0.091). One neuroma and 1 infection were reported. Graft rejection or extrusion was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve conduits and processed nerve allografts offer convenient off-the-shelf options for digital nerve gap repair. Both techniques offer effective means of reconstructing a digital nerve gap <2.5 cm at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Future prospective randomized large sample size studies comparing nerve conduits with allografts are needed to perform subgroup analyses and to define their exact role in digital nerve injuries.

Conduit-based Nerve Repairs Provide Greater Resistance to Tension Compared with Primary Repairs: A Biomechanical Analysis on Large Animal Samples

Background:

When primary repair of transected peripheral nerves is not possible due to large gaps, nerve grafts or repair using conduits are other options to bridge the gap such that the nerve is repaired without tension. When nerve gaps are repaired primarily, there is a worry about tension, failure, and poor healing. In this biomechanical study comparing nerves repaired primarily versus those repaired with conduits, we hypothesized that conduit repair provided greater mechanical breaking strength.

Methods:

We dissected fresh cadaveric sheep hooves and transacted their peripheral nerves. Subsequently, we divided these transacted nerves into 2 groups: primary repair versus repair using a nerve conduit. After repair using a standardized technique, we tensioned each of these repairs via a load tester and recorded the force required till repair failure occurred.

Results:

Six nerves using primary nerve repair and 6 nerves repaired with a nerve conduit (10 mm length × 2.5 mm diameter) were studied. The average breaking strength of the nerves repaired with the nerve conduit was 0.92 N and that using the primary nerve repair technique was 0.46 N (P = 0.001). All the nerves repaired using nerve conduit repair had an additional 5 mm added to their total length as compared with the nerves in the other group.

Conclusions:

Nerve repair using a nerve conduit ensures a higher breaking strength and potentially a greater tension-free repair as compared with primary nerve repairs in a sheep model. This study supports the use of conduits in the bridging of nerve gaps.

Comparable functional motor outcomes after repair of peripheral nerve injury with an elastase-processed allograft in a rat sciatic nerve model

BACKGROUND

A bridging nerve autograft is the gold standard for the repair of segmental nerve injury that cannot be repaired directly. However, limited availability and donor site morbidity remain major disadvantages of autografts. Here, a nerve allograft decellularized with elastase was compared with an autograft regarding functional motor outcome in a rat sciatic segmental nerve defect model. Furthermore, the effect of storage on this allograft was studied.

METHODS

Sixty-six Lewis rats (250-300 g) underwent a 10-mm sciatic nerve reconstruction using either a cold- (n = 22) or frozen-stored (n = 22) decellularized nerve allograft or an autograft (n = 22). Sprague-Dawley rats (300-350 g) served as full major histocompatibility complex-mismatched donors. Functional motor outcome was evaluated after 12 and 16 weeks. Ankle angle, compound muscle action potential (CMAP), isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and histomorphometry were tested bilaterally.

RESULTS

For CMAP and isometric tetanic force, no significant differences were observed between groups. In contrast, for ankle angle, histomorphometry and muscle weight, the cold-stored allograft performed comparable to the autograft, while the frozen-stored allograft performed significantly inferior to the autograft. At week 16, ankle angle was 88.0 ± 3.1% in the cold-stored group, 77.4 ± 3.6% in the frozen-stored group, and 74.1 ± 3.1% in the autograft group (P < .001); At week 16, the muscle weight showed a recovery up to 71.1 ± 4.8% in the autograft group, 67.0 ± 6.6% in the cold-stored group, and 64.7 ± 3.7% in the frozen-stored group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

A nerve allograft decellularized with elastase, if stored under the right conditions, results in comparable functional motor outcomes as the gold standard, the autograft.

Evaluation of two collagen conduits and autograft in rabbit sciatic nerve regeneration with quantitative magnetic resonance DTI, electrophysiology, and histology

Background

We compared different surgical techniques for nerve regeneration in a rabbit sciatic nerve gap model using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), electrophysiology, limb function, and histology.

Methods

A total of 24 male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups: autograft (n = 8), hollow conduit (n = 8), and collagen-filled conduit (n = 8). A 10-mm segment of the rabbit proximal sciatic nerve was cut, and autograft or collagen conduit was used to bridge the gap. DTI on a 3-T system was performed preoperatively and 13 weeks after surgery using the contralateral, nonoperated nerve as a control.

Results

Overall, autograft performed better compared with both conduit groups. Differences in axonal diameter were significant (autograft > hollow conduit > collagen-filled conduit) at 13 weeks (autograft vs. hollow conduit, p = 0.001, and hollow conduit vs. collagen-filled conduit, p < 0.001). Significant group differences were found for axial diffusivity but not for any of the other DTI metrics (autograft > hollow conduit > collagen-filled conduit) (autograft vs. hollow conduit, p = 0.001 and hollow conduit vs. collagen-filled conduit, p = 0.021). As compared with hollow conduit (autograft > collagen-filled conduit > hollow conduit), collagen-filled conduit animals demonstrated a nonsignificant increased maximum tetanic force.

Conclusions

Autograft-treated rabbits demonstrated improved sciatic nerve regeneration compared with collagen-filled and hollow conduits as assessed by histologic, functional, and DTI parameters at 13 weeks.