Ilfeld abduction orthosis is an effective second-line treatment after failure of Pavlik harness for infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Severity of hip dysplasia as the major factor affecting outcome of closed reduction in children with hip dysplasia

The objective of this study was to analyze a multicenter cohort of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who underwent treatment with closed reduction. We sought to report the effects that severity of hip dysplasia and age have on the development of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) and the need for additional procedures. All patients with DDH and minimum 2 years of follow-up who underwent closed reduction were identified. The following variables were recorded: sex, laterality of hip involvement, age, acetabular index (AI), and International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade. The effects of patient age and pre-procedure IHDI grade on the rate of AVN and need for additional procedures after the closed reduction were analyzed using an alpha of 0.05. Seventy-eight total hips were included in the final analysis. The average patient age was 12 months. AVN of the femoral head was reported in 24 hips (30.8%) and 32 hips (41.0%) required additional surgery. Higher pre-op IHDI grade was associated with higher risk of developing Bucholz-Ogden grades II-IV AVN of the femoral head ( P = 0.025) and requiring additional surgery ( P = 0.033) regardless of patient age. There were no statistically significant differences for the effect of age on the measured outcomes ( P  > 0.05). These findings suggest that severity of dislocation (IHDI grade) is a significant risk factor for the development of AVN and need for additional procedure.

Standardized In-harness Ultrasound Protocol Improves Success Rate of Brace Treatment for Dislocated Hips

OBJECTIVE

Infant hip dislocations benefit from early detection and treatment for optimal outcomes. Prior studies have identified that there remains wide variability in the success rate of bracing between institutions. Although there are standardized methods to screen infants for hip dysplasia, there are no clear guidelines regarding how to image a child being treated for a hip dislocation with a Pavlik harness. As a result, there is substantial variability in how treatment success or failure is monitored between and within institutions. The goal of our study is to determine whether a standardized in-harness imaging protocol improves outcomes and the likelihood of successful treatment for dislocated hips being treated with the Pavlik harness.

METHODS

All patients with hip dislocations and pretreatment ultrasound (US) were included from July 2018 to July 2022. A new institutional US protocol was implemented in July 2020, during which standardized in-harness imaging was obtained for patients with hip dislocations. Patients treated before the implementation of standardized in-harness imaging were categorized as nonstandardized and after implementation as a standardized group. Outcomes were compared between standardized and nonstandardized groups. P <0.05 determined the statistical significance.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight hips met the inclusion criteria (n = 97 patients). The mean age at diagnosis was 41.6 ± 23.4 days and was predominantly female (85.6%). There was no significant difference between the patients' demographics and baseline clinical characteristics between the standardized and nonstandardized groups. Pavlik harness success rate was significantly higher in the standardized group (85% vs 60%, P = 0.0024). Twenty-eight hips in the nonstandardized group remained dislocated and were indicated for surgical treatment, whereas only 8 hips remained dislocated in the standardized group and necessitated closed or open reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of in-harness imaging for patients undergoing treatment for developmental hip dislocations can significantly improve the Pavlik harness success rate. These findings emphasize the importance of obtaining images with the hip in flexion and abduction to prevent inadvertent stress during US evaluation for hips that have not yet stabilized, which may lead to premature cessation of the Pavlik harness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does brace treatment following closed reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip improve acetabular coverage?

Aims

Abduction bracing is commonly used to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) following closed reduction and spica casting, with little evidence to support or refute this practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of abduction bracing after closed reduction in improving acetabular index (AI) and reducing secondary surgery for residual hip dysplasia.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with closed reduction for DDH at a single tertiary referral centre. Demographic data were obtained including severity of dislocation based on the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, age at reduction, and casting duration. Patients were prescribed no abduction bracing, part-time, or full-time wear post-reduction and casting. AI measurements were obtained immediately upon cast removal and from two- and four-year follow-up radiographs.

Results

A total of 243 hips underwent closed reduction and 82% (199/243) were treated with abduction bracing. There was no difference between those treated with or without bracing with regard to sex, age at reduction, severity of dislocation, spica duration, or immediate post-casting AI (all p > 0.05). There was no difference in hips treated with or without abduction brace with regard to AI at two years post-reduction (32.4° (SD 5.3°) vs 30.9° (SD 4.6°), respectively; p = 0.099) or at four years post-reduction (26.4° (SD 5.2°) vs 25.4° (SD 5.1°), respectively; p = 0.231). Multivariate analysis revealed only IHDI grade predicted AI at two years post-reduction (p = 0.004). There was no difference in overall rate of secondary surgery for residual dysplasia between hips treated with or without bracing (32% vs 39%, respectively; p = 0.372). However, there was an increased risk of early secondary surgery (< two years post-reduction) in the non-braced group (11.4% vs 2.5%; p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Abduction bracing following closed reduction for DDH treatment is not associated with decreased residual dysplasia at two or four years post-reduction but may reduce rates of early secondary surgery. A prospective study is indicated to provide more definitive recommendations.

Abduction Bracing Following Anterior Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Does Not Improve Residual Dysplasia or Reduce Secondary Surgery

BACKGROUND

Abduction bracing is commonly used following open reduction and spica casting of developmental dysplasia of the hip. However, there is little evidence to support or refute this practice that carries associated cost and burden for families. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of abduction bracing after open reduction in improving the acetabular dysplasia and reducing the rate of secondary surgery for residual dysplasia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients treated with open reduction at a single tertiary referral center. Demographic data, severity of dislocation [International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) class], age at reduction, and casting duration were obtained. Patients were prescribed no bracing, part-time (≤18 h/d), or full-time (≥20 h/d) brace wear based on surgeon preference. Acetabular index (AI) measurements were obtained at cast removal and at 2- and 4-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 146 hips underwent open reduction with 61% (89/146) of hips treated with abduction bracing. There was no difference between braced and nonbraced cohorts with regards to sex, age at time of reduction, dislocation severity, cast duration, immediate postcasting AI, or incidence of medial open reduction. There was no difference in hips treated with or without brace following open reduction with regards to AI at 2 years postreduction (31.8±6.7 vs. 30.4±6.1 degrees, P =0.27) or at 4 years postreduction (24.9±6.5 vs. 24.7±6.5 degrees, P =0.97). However, further analysis showed lower mean AI at 2-year follow-up for braced versus nonbraced patients following medial open reduction (30.0±5.7 vs. 34.5±7.0 degrees, P =0.02). This difference was no longer present at 4-year follow-up (26.6±6.8 vs. 24.2±6.6 degrees, P =0.44). However, 4/19 (21%) nonbraced hips underwent secondary surgery for residual dysplasia and were consequently excluded from the AI measurement at 4 years postreduction (compared with 4/39 [10%] braced hips within the same time period). There was no difference in the rate of secondary surgery between braced and nonbraced hips (30% vs. 33%, respectively, P =0.70). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neither IHDI classification, bracing, nor age at reduction predicted residual dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Abduction bracing following anterior open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip is not associated with decreased residual dysplasia at 2/4 years postreduction or with decreased secondary surgery. These results suggest that abduction bracing following anterior open reduction may not provide clinical benefit. However, abduction bracing may be beneficial following medial open reduction. A prospective study is necessary to provide more definitive recommendations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic study.

Clinical features and management of the developmental dysplasia of the hip in congenital muscular torticollis

PURPOSE

A consistent relationship between CMT and DDH has been established. However, whether the presence of CMT has effect on clinical outcomes of DDH remains unanswered. This study aimed to evaluate clinical features and management of DDH in patients with CMT.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 54 patients (91 hips) simultaneously diagnosed with DDH and CMT and included 54 patients (97 hips) with only DDH by random number method as the control group. Clinical and examination outcomes were recorded and compared, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 18.1 ± 14.5 months (range, 2 to 72 mo). In the DDH and CMT group, the age of initial treatment was lower (100.8 ± 92.3 vs. 229.0 ± 157.4 d, P < 0.001), and the rate of male significantly increased (42.6% vs. 11.1%, P < 0.001). Before treatment, development degree of hip was better than that of the DDH group. Therefore, patients with CMT had approximately 14 times greater odds of conservative treatment success than children in the DDH group (OR, 13.84; 95% CI, 3.16 to 60.60).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that CMT was not the risk factor for the failure of treatment. On the contrary, the identification of CMT may be beneficial to early discovery and treatment of DDH when we remain vigilant to perform physical exam and screen imaging of DDH for patients with CMT.

The nomogram predicting the early failure rate of the Pavlik harness for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants under 6 months of age

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to develop a nomogram predicting the early failure rate of Pavlik harness in infants under 6 months of age with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 227 patients (372 hips) with DDH who were treated with Pavlik harness at our institution from August 2019 to January 2022. Fifty-eight patients (102 hips) failed the Pavlik harness treatment, and 169 patients (270 hips) were successfully treated. Then, the independent risk factors for treatment failure were determined via univariate and multivariate logistic regression and used to generate the nomogram predicting the failure rate of the Pavlik harness.

RESULTS

It was found that age at initial treatment (OR 1.031, 95% CI 1.022-1.040, P < 0.001), angle α (OR 0.723, 95% CI 0.671-0.779, P < 0.001), and concomitant deformity (OR 0.129, 95% CI 0.036-0.459, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for treatment failure. The nomogram showed good discrimination [the area under the curve (AUC): 0.862], good calibration, and a net benefit in the range of probabilities between 5 and 90% according to the decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully established the nomogram prediction model based on three independent risk factors. Due to the high level of predicting accuracy, this nomogram could be a useful resource for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to identify patients at major risk of Pavlik harness failure who might need more reliable treatments.

Principles of Bracing in the Early Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Bracing is considered a gold standard in treating Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) in infants under 6 months of age with reducible hips. A variety of braces are available that work on similar principles of limiting hip adduction and extension. This paper summarises the current evidence regarding bracing in DDH. Most of the literature pertains to the Pavlik harness (PH) and there are few studies for other brace types. Bracing eliminates dislocating forces from the hamstrings, the block to reduction of the psoas and improves the muscle line of pull to stabilise the hip joint. Recent studies have shown no benefit in bracing for stable dysplasia. The rates of PH treatment failure in Ortolani-positive hips have been reported to be high. Barlow positive hips have lower Graf grades and are more amenable to PH treatment. There is consensus that the earlier the diagnosis of DDH and initiation of PH treatment, the better the outcome. Failure rates due to unsuccessful reduction and AVN are higher with treatment initiated after age 4-6 months. Studies have shown no benefits of staged weaning of braces. While there is no maximum time in brace, current consensus suggests a minimum of 6 weeks. The key to successful bracing lies in education and communication with the family.

Narrative Review of Complications Following DDH Treatment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this narrative review was to survey the literature for common complications following treatment of DDH in children less than 4 years old.

METHODS

The Pubmed database was queried. Search result titles were reviewed to identify papers that were pertinent to the topic. Abstracts for these papers were obtained and read, and a subset of these were selected for review of the complete manuscript.

RESULTS

92 manuscripts were reviewed. Residual dysplasia, redislocation, and osteonecrosis are the primary complications of treatment in this age group. In the long term, hips without complications related to DDH treatment tend to do well, although a significant percentage of them will inevitably require joint replacement surgery.

CONCLUSION

Although there is excellent potential for a good outcome when DDH is diagnosed and treated under age 4 years, osteonecrosis continues to be a concern with all treatment methods. A subset of patients from this young cohort will continue to have residual dysplasia or recurrent dislocation requiring return to the operating room.

An Inverted Acetabular Labrum Is Predictive of Pavlik Harness Treatment Failure in Children With Developmental Hip Dysplasia

INTRODUCTION

The failure rate of Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been reported as high as 55%. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of an inverted acetabular labrum on outcomes of Pavlik harness treatment for DDH.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on DDH patients at a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2004 to 2016. DDH patients that underwent index treatment with Pavlik harness and had minimum 12 months follow-up were included. Medical charts were reviewed for demographics, treatment, and outcomes. Outcomes were compared between patients with an inverted labrum versus those without an inverted labrum.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients with 229 dysplastic hips were included. The mean age at initiation of Pavlik harness treatment was 1.9±1.4 months and mean follow-up was 37.7±23.0 months. Bilateral DDH was diagnosed in 46% (73/156) of patients. In all, 37% (75/229) of hips failed Pavlik harness index treatment. Second-line treatment was rigid hip abduction bracing in 91% (68/75) of hips, closed reduction in 5% (4/75) of hips, and open reduction in 4% (3/75) of hips. An inverted labrum was present in 10% (22/229) of all hips. The incidence of Pavlik harness treatment failure was 91% (20/22) in the inverted labrum group compared with 27% (55/207) in the control group (P<0.001). Closed or open reduction was required in 86% (15/22) of the inverted labrum group compared with 3% (7/207) of hips in the control group (P<0.001). The incidence of avascular necrosis was 18% (4/22) in hips with an inverted labrum compared with 0.4% (1/207) in the control group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with DDH undergoing index treatment in a Pavlik harness, the presence of an inverted acetabular labrum is strongly predictive of treatment failure. Dysplastic hips with an inverted labrum also have a significantly higher risk of requiring closed or open reduction and developing avascular necrosis compared with those without an inverted labrum.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Team Approach: Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) encompasses a wide spectrum of hip disorders, including neonatal instability, acetabular dysplasia, hip subluxation, and frank dislocation of the hip. It is a common disorder, with a reported incidence of between 0.1% and >10% of live births. Coordinated, interdisciplinary care is important to achieving successful outcomes. This starts with accurate assessment of risk factors in the prenatal period, thorough clinical examination by the primary care provider at all well-child visits, and early referral to a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment is critical for an excellent outcome. Ongoing, open communication between clinicians is essential for the effective coordination of care. Treatment options vary depending on the age of presentation. A Pavlik harness (dynamic hip abduction orthosis) is used for children up to 6 months of age. A more rigid abduction orthosis may be used if treatment with a Pavlik harness is unsuccessful, with a closed reduction and spica cast being the next step if needed for children up to 18 months of age. Finally, open reduction with possible concomitant femoral and/or pelvic osteotomies is the surgical option in an older child, when necessary. In general, the later the child is diagnosed with and treated for DDH, the greater the risk of a nonoptimal outcome. Depending on the severity of the condition, children with DDH may need to be followed closely until skeletal maturity so as not to miss the diagnosis of asymptomatic residual hip dysplasia, which can predispose patients to early hip arthritis.

Tübingen hip flexion splint more successful than Pavlik harness for decentred hips after the age of three months

AIMS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients younger than six months of age with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) managed by either a Pavlik harness or Tübingen hip flexion splint.

METHODS

Records of 251 consecutive infants with a mean age of 89 days (SD 47), diagnosed with DDH between January 2015 and December 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria for patients with DDH were: younger than 180 days at the time of diagnosis; ultrasound Graf classification of IIc or greater; treatment by Pavlik harness or Tübingen splint; and no prior treatment history. All patients underwent hip ultrasound every seven days during the first three weeks of treatment and subsequently every three to four weeks until completion of treatment. If no signs of improvement were found after three weeks, the Pavlik harness or Tübingen splint was discontinued. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The study included 251 patients with Graf grades IIc to IV in 18 males and 233 females with DDH. Mean follow-up time was 22 months (SD 10). A total of 116 hips were graded as Graf IIc (39.1%), nine as grade D (3.0%), 100 as grade III (33.7%), and 72 as grade IV (24.2%). There were 109 patients (128 hips) in the Pavlik group and 142 patients (169 hips) in the Tübingen group (p = 0.227). The Tübingen group showed a 69.8% success rate in Graf III and Graf IV hips while the success rate was significantly lower in the Pavlik group, 53.9% (p = 0.033). For infants older than three months of age, the Tübingen group showed a 71.4% success rate, and the Pavlik group a 54.4% success rate (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The Tübingen splint should be the preferred treatment option for children older than three months, and for those with severe forms of DDH such as Graf grade III and IV, who are younger than six months at time of diagnosis. The Tübingen hip flexion splint is a valid alternative to the Pavlik harness for older infants and those with more severe DDH. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):991-998.

Dynamic and Static Splinting for Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most common pediatric conditions. The current gold-standard treatment for children under six months of age with a reducible hip is bracing, but the orthopedic literature features several splint options, and each one has many advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this review is to analyze the available literature to document the up-to-date evidence on DDH conservative treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Science Direct databases was performed by two independent authors (C.d.C. and A.V.) using the keywords "developmental dysplasia hip", "brace", "harness", "splint", "abduction brace" to evaluate studies of any level of evidence that reported clinical or preclinical results and dealt with conservative DDH treatment. The result of every stage was reviewed and approved by the senior investigators (V.P. and G.T.).

RESULTS

A total of 1411 articles were found. After the exclusion of duplicates, 367 articles were selected. At the end of the first screening, following the previously described selection criteria, we selected 29 articles eligible for full text reading. The included articles mainly focus on the Pavlik harness, Frejka, and Tubingen among the dynamic splint applications as well as the rhino-style brace, Ilfeld and generic abduction brace among the static splint applications. The main findings of the included articles were summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic splinting for DDH represents a valid therapeutic option in cases of instability and dislocation, especially if applied within 4-5 months of life. Dynamic splinting has a low contraindication. Static bracing is an effective option too, but only for stable hips or residual acetabular dysplasia.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: can contrast-enhanced MRI predict the development of avascular necrosis following surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting avascular necrosis (AVN) of the treated femoral head after surgical reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using qualitative and quantitative methods.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant retrospective study included 47 children who underwent same-day contrast-enhanced MRI following unilateral surgical hip reduction between April 2009 and June 2018. Blinded to the clinical outcome, 3 reviewers (2 pediatric radiologists and 1 pediatric orthopedist) independently categorized the enhancement pattern of the treated femoral head. Signal intensities, measured using regions of interest (ROI), were compared between treated and untreated hips and percent enhancements were compared between hips that developed and did not develop AVN. Post-reduction radiographs were evaluated using Salter's criteria for AVN and Kalmachi and MacEwen's classification for growth disturbance. Non-parametric tests and Fisher exact test were used to compare enhancement values between AVN and non-AVN hips. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Ten (21%) out of the 47 children (7 boys and 40 girls; mean age 9.0 ± 4.7 months) developed AVN. Age at surgical reduction was significantly higher (p = 0.03) for hips that developed AVN. No significant differences were found in gender (p = 0.61), laterality (p = 0.46), surgical approach (p = 0.08), history of pre-operative bracing (p = 0.72), abduction angle (p = 0.18-0.44), enhancement pattern (p = 0.66-0.76), or percent enhancement (p = 0.41-0.88) between AVN and non-AVN groups.

CONCLUSION

Neither enhancement pattern nor percent enhancement predicted AVN, suggesting that post-reduction conventional MRI does not accurately distinguish between reversible and permanent vascular injury.

An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence

Background

Systematic reviews (SRs) of computer-assisted (CA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) report conflicting evidence on its superiority over conventional surgery. Little is known about the quality of these SRs; variability in their methodological quality may be a contributing factor. We evaluated the methodological quality of all published SRs to date, summarized and examined the consistency of the evidence generated by these SRs.

Methods

We searched four databases through December 31, 2018. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was applied to assess the methodological quality. Evidence from included meta-analyses on functional, radiological and patient-safety outcomes was summarized. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess the overlap between SRs in including the primary studies.

Results

Based on AMSTAR 2, confidence was critically low in 39 of the 42 included SRs and low in 3 SRs. Low rating was mainly due to failure in developing a review protocol (90.5%); providing a list of excluded studies (81%); accounting for risk of bias when discussing the results (67%); using a comprehensive search strategy (50%); and investigating publication bias (50%). Despite inconsistency between SR findings comparing functional, radiological and patient safety outcomes for CA and conventional procedures, most TKA meta-analyses favored CA TKA, whereas most THA meta-analyses showed no difference. Moderate overlap was observed among TKA SRs and high overlap among THA SRs.

Conclusions

Despite conclusions of meta-analyses favoring CA arthroplasty, decision makers adopting this technology should be aware of the low confidence in the results of the included SRs. To improve confidence in future SRs, journals should consider using a methodological assessment tool to evaluate the SRs prior to making a publication decision.

Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the Versius Surgical System, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery

Background

Robot-assisted minimal access surgery (MAS) reduces blood loss, recovery time, intraoperative and postoperative complications and pain. However, uptake of robotic MAS remains low, suggesting there are barriers to its use. To overcome these barriers, a new surgical robot system, Versius, was developed based on the needs and feedback of surgeons and surgical teams.

Methods

The surgical robot prototype was designed based on observations in the operating room (OR) and previous interviews with surgeons. Formative studies with surgeons and surgical teams were used to refine the prototype design, resulting in modifications to all components, including the arms, instruments, handgrips and surgeon console. Proof-of-concept cadaver studies were used to further optimize its design by assessing its usability during surgical procedures.

Results

Feedback led to the development of a novel, mobile design with independent arm carts and surgical console, linked by supported serial or parallel connections, providing maximum flexibility in the OR. Instrument tips were developed based on surgeons’ preferred designs and wristed at the tip providing seven degrees of freedom within the patient. Multiple handgrip designs were assessed by surgeons; of these, a ‘game controller’ design was rated most popular and usable. An open surgical console design allowing multiple working positions was rated highest by surgeons and the surgical teams.

Conclusions

This surgical robot system has been developed using feedback from end users throughout the design process and aims to minimize barriers to robotic MAS uptake. Additionally, these studies demonstrate system success in the surgical procedures it was designed for. The studies reported here, and further studies of the Versius Surgical System, are intended to align with IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study) Framework guidance.

Imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasound, radiography and magnetic resonance imaging

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) describes a broad spectrum of developmental abnormalities of the hip joint that are traditionally diagnosed during infancy. Because the development of the hip joint is a dynamic process, optimal treatment depends not only on the severity of the dysplasia, but also on the age of the child. Various imaging modalities are routinely used to confirm suspected diagnosis, to assess severity, and to monitor treatment response. For infants younger than 4 months, screening hip ultrasound (US) is recommended only for those with risk factors, equivocal or positive exam findings, whereas for infants older than 4-6 months, pelvis radiography is preferred. Following surgical hip reduction, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is preferred over computed tomography (CT) because MR can not only confirm concentric hip joint reduction, but also identify the presence of soft-tissue barriers to reduction and any unexpected postoperative complications. The routine use of contrast-enhanced MR remains controversial because of the relative paucity of well-powered and validated literature. The main objectives of this article are to review the normal and abnormal developmental anatomy of the hip joint, to discuss the rationale behind the current recommendations on the most appropriate selection of imaging modalities for screening and diagnosis, and to review routine and uncommon findings that can be identified on post-reduction MR, using an evidence-based approach. A basic understanding of the physiology and the pathophysiology can help ensure the selection of optimal imaging modality and reduce equivocal diagnoses that can lead to unnecessary treatment.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Pediatricians are often the first to identify developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and direct subsequent appropriate treatment. The general treatment principle of DDH is to obtain and maintain a concentric reduction of the femoral head in the acetabulum. Achieving this goal can range from less-invasive bracing treatments to more-invasive surgical treatment depending on the age and complexity of the dysplasia. In this review, we summarize the current trends and treatment principles in the diagnosis and treatment of DDH.

Graf Type-IV Hips Have a Higher Risk of Residual Acetabular Dysplasia at 1 Year of Age Following Successful Pavlik Harness Treatment for Developmental Hip Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

We asked whether patient-specific factors and ultrasound (US) measurements of hip dysplasia severity at initial examination influence short-term residual acetabular dysplasia in patients successfully treated with Pavlik harness for developmental hip dysplasia.

METHODS

After IRB approval, 134 hips (84 patients) successfully treated by the Pavlik method between August 2011 and October 2014 with follow-up at 12 months of age were identified. Early successful treatment was defined as normal examination and US after approximately 12 weeks of Pavlik treatment. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with acetabular index (AI) measurements at 12 months as well as factors associated with an increase in AI between the 6- and 12-month timepoints (dysplastic progression).

RESULTS

The study consisted of 134 hips (84 patients). The distribution of dysplastic, Barlow, and Ortolani hips was 44.8% (N=60), 30.6% (N=41), and 24.6% (N=33), respectively. The crude incidence of residual dysplasia at the 6-month visit (AI>30 degrees) was 11.7% (12/102). The incidence of residual dysplasia at the 12-month visit (AI>28 degrees) was 11.8% (13/111). Graf type was the only variable associated with AI values at the 12-month visit (mean difference: Graf type-IV-Other, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-4.9; P=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of residual acetabular dysplasia after normal hip US following Pavlik treatment is not negligible. Radiographic surveillance is warranted to monitor and screen for dysplasia progression. Patients with dislocated Graf type-IV hips at diagnosis are at increased risk of residual acetabular dysplasia at 1 year after successful treatment with the Pavlik method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic study.

Poorer radiological outcome after delayed diagnosis and treatment in human position in Fettweis plaster cast in 93 unstable hip joints type D, III and IV according to Graf

PURPOSE

In this study the course of unstable hips after successful treatment with Fettweis plaster of Paris (POP) is examined. Special focus will be given to age at beginning of treatment and initial hip type.

METHODS

The development of 93 unstable hips treated between November 2001 and April 2015 was examined. Inclusion criteria were: 1) unstable hips with successful treatment with Fettweis POP; 2) presence of two pelvic radiographs (12 to 24 months and 24 to 48 months). We analyzed: 1) the initial ultrasound hip type according to Graf; 2) the average age at first and second radiograph; 3) the Tönnis classification: normal findings (< 1 SD), slightly (1 SD to 2 SD) and severely dysplastic hips (> 2 SD).

RESULTS

In all, there were 14 hips type D, 41 hips type III and 38 hips type IV. Mean age of the first radiograph was 13.9 months and of the second 28.5 months. The first radiograph showed: (< 1 SD): 36, (1 SD to 2 SD): 34, (> 2 SD): 23 hips, the second radiograph: (< 1 SD): 33, (1 SD to 2 SD): 19, (> 2 SD): 30 hips. With subdivision at the start of treatment at age eight or fewer weeks 2/16 hips (12.5%) and with initiation of the treatment more than eight weeks 22/77 (26.0%) deteriorated. During the course between first and second radiograph a total of 35.7% of initial hip type D, 19.5% of type III and 23.7% of type IV deteriorated.

CONCLUSION

Radiograph controls after treatment with Fettweis POP show poorer outcome after delaying the start of treatment more than 8 weeks. These findings were independent of the initial ultrasound hip type. Regular radiograph controls of all hip types treated for unstable hips are justified to detect residual dysplasia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip with the Pavlik harness in children under six months of age: indications, results and failures

PURPOSE

The aim of this article is to review the current concepts in the indications, results and failure causes of the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with the Pavlik harness.

METHODS

The reported variables influencing the outcome in the Pavlik harness treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant discrepancies about the clinical and radiological outcomes, the rates of failure and complications as well as the variables influencing the treatment outcome occur in the published studies due to the heterogeneity of the data and the differences in the methods used. The overall short-, mid- or long-term success rate of the treatment ranges from 45% to 100% and it is commonly over 75%. The rate of osteonecrosis of the femoral head ranges from 1% to 30%. Age, gender, laterality, radiological or clinical severity of the initial hip pathology and parents' compliance are the commonly reported determinants of failure of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The failure in treatment with the Pavlik harness is multifactorial, initial type of hip dysplasia being the most prominent followed by the treatment initiation age. This type of treatment cannot be considered as the best option in Graf IV hips (hip ultrasonography) or highly dislocated hips (plain radiography) and in infants older than three months of age, as the risk of failure and development of complications including osteonecrosis and femoral nerve palsy seem to increase in such circumstances. Large-scale, comparative studies including homogenous data are needed to answer the unsolved questions concerning indications.

Treatment of the Dislocated Hip in Infants With Spasticity

BACKGROUND

Although many studies have separately investigated the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip and spastic hip disease, little data exist regarding the treatment of infants with dislocated hips and underlying spasticity. The purpose of this study was to review our results after the surgical treatment of these infants.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all children below 3 years of age who underwent hip reconstruction for dislocated hips in the setting of cerebral palsy or other spastic/high-tone neuromuscular disease. Medical records were reviewed for clinical data including treatment course, complications, and need for further surgery. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to determine International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade of dislocation, acetabular index, migration percentage, and presence of avascular necrosis according to the Salter criteria.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with 15 hips met our inclusion criteria with a mean age of 20±8 (range, 6 to 34) months. Preoperatively, 12 of 15 hips (80%) were IHDI grade 4 and 3 of 15 (20%) were IHDI grade 3. Mean acetabular index was 29±8 (range, 19 to 46) degrees. Patients underwent open reduction (15 hips), adductor tenotomy (14 hips), femoral osteotomy (10 hips), and pelvic osteotomy (12 hips). At a mean follow-up of 40±16 (range, 13 to 71) months, 13 of 15 hips were IHDI grade 1 (86.7%), 1 was IHDI grade 2 (6.7%), and 1 hip was IHDI grade 3 (6.7%). The mean postoperative migration index was 7%±24% (range, -30% to 46%); the mean acetabular index was 22±8 (range, 9 to 38) degrees. No patients developed radiographically significant osteonecrosis. Complications included 2 femur fractures (13.3%) and 1 symptomatic implant that required early removal. One patient underwent further reconstructive hip surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of infants with hip dislocations and underlying spasticity, open reduction±pelvic osteotomy and/or femoral osteotomy has a nearly 90% success rate in achieving and maintaining adequate hip reduction at intermediate-term follow-up. In the unique population of infants with dislocated hips and underlying spasticity, comprehensive hip reconstruction is largely successful with an acceptable rate of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: an update on diagnosis and management from birth to 6 months

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is evolving. This review focuses on the most up-to-date literature on DDH in patients from birth to six months of age.

RECENT FINDINGS

Well known risk factors for DDH include family history, female sex, and breech positioning. Recent evidence suggests higher birth weight is a risk, whereas prematurity may be protective. Screening includes physical examination of all infant hips and imaging when abnormal findings or risk factors are present. Treatment in the first six months consists of a harness, with 70-95% success. Failure risk factors include femoral nerve palsy, static bracing, irreducible hips, initiation after seven weeks of age, right hip dislocation, Graf-IV hips, and male sex. Rigid bracing may be trialed if reduction with a harness fails and closed reduction is indicated after failed bracing. If the hip is still irreducible, nonconcentric, or unstable, open reduction may be required following closed reduction. Evidence does not support delaying hip reduction until the ossific nucleus is present.

SUMMARY

DDH affects 1-7% of infants. All infants should be examined and selective screening with imaging should be performed for abnormal physical exams or risk factors. Early treatment is associated with optimal outcomes.

Higher Pavlik Harness Treatment Failure Is Seen in Graf Type IV Ortolani-positive Hips in Males

BACKGROUND

Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) whose hips are dislocated but reducible (Ortolani positive) are more likely to experience Pavlik harness treatment failure than are patients with dysplastic and reduced but dislocatable (Barlow positive) hips. However, data regarding factors associated with failure are limited and conflicting.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) What is the frequency of Pavlik harness treatment failure among Ortolani-positive hips, Barlow-positive hips, and dysplastic hips? (2) What are the factors predictive of failure of Pavlik harness treatment for Ortolani-positive hips?

METHODS

In this retrospective study we identified 150 patients who underwent the Pavlik harness method for treatment of DDH between August 2011 and July 2015. Six patients initially treated at an outside facility, four patients with associated conditions, and three who pursued treatment elsewhere were excluded. A total of 137 patients (215 hips) with a median age at the time of Pavlik placement of 30 days (range, 4-155 days) were included. Of the 215 hips, 78 (36.3%) were Ortolani positive, 60 (27.9%) were Barlow positive, and 77 (35.8%) were stable, with the diagnosis of dysplasia made on ultrasound. All patients were treated with the Pavlik harness method. The primary outcome was failure of the Pavlik harness to achieve and maintain concentric hip reduction assessed by examination and ultrasound. All patients were followed after completion of Pavlik treatment for a minimum of 2 months (mean, 3 months; range, 2-4 months). In addition, 90% (122 of 137) of the patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. Patient-specific data including family history, breech versus cephalic presentation at birth, age, sex, laterality, and hip abduction were recorded. Ultrasound data at the time of diagnosis included Graf classification, alpha angle, and percentage of femoral head coverage.

RESULTS

The Pavlik harness method failed in 27% (21 of 78) of hips that were Ortolani positive, 8% (six of 77) with dysplasia, and 5% (three of 60) that were Barlow positive. After controlling for potential confounding variables, such as range of hip abduction, male sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% CI, 2.0-24.2; p = 0.002) and Graf Type IV ultrasound classification (dislocated hip with alpha angle less than 43° and labrum displaced downward) (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.3-15.4; p = 0.019) were identified as independent predictors of failure of Pavlik treatment among Ortolani-positive hips.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound imaging of the hip should be part of the initial assessment for Ortolani-positive hips, as the ultrasound classification was found to have prognostic implications. Parents of male infants with Graf Type IV hips should be counseled regarding the higher risk of Pavlik failure. Future well-designed prospective controlled studies are necessary to establish whether alternative strategies to the Pavlik harness might improve the early outcomes of DDH in males with Graf Type IV hips.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: What has changed in the last 20 years?

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) describes the spectrum of structural abnormalities that involve the growing hip. Early diagnosis and treatment is critical to provide the best possible functional outcome. Persistence of hip dysplasia into adolescence and adulthood may result in abnormal gait, decreased strength and increased rate of degenerative hip and knee joint disease. Despite efforts to recognize and treat all cases of DDH soon after birth, diagnosis is delayed in some children, and outcomes deteriorate with increasing delay of presentation. Different screening programs for DDH were implicated. The suspicion is raised based on a physical examination soon after birth. Radiography and ultrasonography are used to confirm the diagnosis. The role of other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, is still undetermined; however, extensive research is underway on this subject. Treatment depends on the age of the patient and the reducibility of the hip joint. At an early age and up to 6 mo, the main treatment is an abduction brace like the Pavlik harness. If this fails, closed reduction and spica casting is usually done. After the age of 18 mo, treatment usually consists of open reduction and hip reconstruction surgery. Various treatment protocols have been proposed. We summarize the current practice for detection and treatment of DDH, emphasizing updates in screening and treatment during the last two decades.