Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes After Prior Non-Arthroplasty Shoulder Surgery

Clinical outcomes validate the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria algorithm for anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for streamlining the clinical decision-making process

Aims

A recent study used the RAND Corporation at University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) method to develop anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) appropriateness criteria. The purpose of our study was to determine how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) vary based on appropriateness.

Methods

Clinical data from a multicentre database identified patients who underwent primary aTSA from November 2004 to January 2023. A total of 390 patients (mean follow-up 48.1 months (SD 42.0)) were included: 97 (24.9%) were classified as appropriate, 218 (55.9%) inconclusive, and 75 (19.2%) inappropriate. Patients were classified as "appropriate", "inconclusive", or "inappropriate", using a modified version of an appropriateness algorithm, which accounted for age, rotator cuff status, mobility, symptomatology, and Walch classification. Multiple pre- and postoperative scores were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Postoperative complications were also analyzed.

Results

All groups achieved significant improvement in mean PROM scores postoperatively. "Appropriate" patients experienced significantly greater improvement in visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score compared to "inconclusive" and "inappropriate". The appropriate group had a significantly greater proportion of patients who achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (95.8%; n = 93) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) (92.6%; n = 89). Overall, 13 patients had postoperative complications. No significant differences in postoperative complications among classifications were found.

Conclusion

Our data clinically validate the RAND/UCLA aTSA appropriateness criteria algorithm, allowing for more rapid and reliable determination of aTSA candidacy. "Appropriate" patients were more likely to achieve MCID and SCB for ASES scores compared to "inappropriate" patients. Among "appropriate" patients who did not achieve SCB, 50% (n = 4) had a postoperative complication. There was a significantly higher proportion of postoperative complications among those who did not achieve SCB across all three groups. Only 7.1% (n = 1) of patients who did not achieve SCB in the inappropriate group had a postoperative complication. Thus, it can be inferred that the failure to reach SCB in the appropriate group was likely to be due to a postoperative complication, whereas for patients deemed "inappropriate", failure to reach SCB may be secondary to factors accounted for within our algorithm.

Outcomes of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With and Without Prior Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

Background

The effect of prior rotator cuff repair (RCR) on clinical outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is unclear.

Purpose

To systematically review the literature to compare the outcomes of TSA in patients with and without prior RCR.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to identify studies comparing outcomes of TSA with and without prior RCR. The inclusion criteria were full-text studies that directly compared outcomes between patients undergoing anatomic or reverse TSA with and without prior RCR. A quality assessment was performed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS), and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A total of 1542 articles were identified for review based on initial database queries. Weighted means of quantifiable demographics and patient-reported outcomes were calculated for all included studies and compiled, in addition to the MCMS and ROBINS-I tool.

Results

Twelve studies (10 level 3, 2 level 4) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 885 patients who underwent RCR before TSA (mean age, 68.2 years) and 2275 patients with no prior RCR (mean age, 70.0 years). Of all outcomes evaluated, patients with reverse TSA showed superior results in the no prior RCR group. Three reverse TSA studies found the no prior RCR group to have significantly higher postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores when compared with the prior RCR group (P < .05). Multiple reverse TSA studies found the no prior RCR group to have significantly higher postoperative Simple Shoulder Test scores (P < .05) and significantly improved forward elevation (P < .05) when compared with the prior RCR group. Of all outcomes in anatomic TSA studies, only complication rate was different between groups, with 1 study finding a significantly lower complication rate in the no prior RCR group (P = .01).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing reverse TSA without prior RCR can be expected to experience statistically better outcomes when compared with patients with prior RCR, while patients undergoing anatomic TSA can be expected to have similar outcomes regardless of prior RCR status.

The History and Evolution of the Open Labral Repair with Capsular Shift for Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the evolution of the open labral repair with capsular shift, including the current role of this procedure in the treatment of shoulder instability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, a subset of patients - high-level collision/contact sport athletes, patients with significant inferior or multi-directional instability, and individuals with failed arthroscopic Bankart repair without bone loss - may experience benefit from undergoing open Bankart repair with capsular shift. Surgeons performing open stabilization can benefit from instrumentation and anchors developed to assist with arthroscopic techniques. Understanding the history and evolution behind the procedure not only allows the surgeon to appreciate principles behind an arthroscopic approach, but also permits the utilization of an open approach when required by patient pathology and risk factors.

Moment arms of the coracobrachialis and short head of biceps following a Latarjet procedure: a modeling study

BACKGROUND

The Latarjet procedure transfers the coracoid process to the anterior glenoid. This prevents recurrent anterior humeral dislocation but alters the origins of the coracobrachialis (CBR) and short head of the biceps (SHB). The impact of this alteration on the moment arms of these muscles has not been examined.

METHODS

The Newcastle Shoulder Model was updated with 15 healthy cadaveric bone models to create customized shoulder models. The CBR and SHB muscles were attached to the anterior glenoid via an elliptical wrapping object. Muscle moment arms were calculated for abduction, forward flexion, scapular plane elevation, and internal rotation with 20° and 90° of abduction. Statistical comparison of moment arms between native and Latarjet shoulders was performed using spm1D.

RESULTS

By transferring the origins of the CBR and SHB to the anterior glenoid, both muscles had extension moment arms during glenohumeral elevation in the coronal, sagittal, and scapular planes. Their average moment arms during abduction (-30.4 ± 3.2 mm for CBR and -29.8 ± 3.0 mm for SHB) and forward flexion (-26.0 ± 3.1 mm for CBR and -26.2 ± 3.2 mm for SHB) suggested that their role after the Latarjet procedure changed compared with their role in the native shoulder (P < .001). At higher abduction levels, both the muscles had higher internal rotation moment arms compared with the native shoulder.

CONCLUSION

The Latarjet procedure affected the moment arms of the CBR and SHB. Both muscles had increased extension and internal rotation moment arms at higher degrees of elevation compared with the native shoulders. This finding suggests that these muscles act as dynamic stabilizers after the Latarjet procedure.

Shoulder Arthroplasty After Previous Nonarthroplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications

BACKGROUND

Many patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have had at least 1 nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery before the surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of previous shoulder surgery on the outcome of SA. A systematic review was conducted to compare functional outcomes and complications between SA patients with and without prior non-SA surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science comprehensively from inception to January 2023. Based on 9,279 records reviewed, 26 comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis consisting of 5,431 shoulders with prior nonarthroplasty procedures (cases) and 55,144 shoulders without previous surgery (controls). Variables such as functional scores, complications, and range of motion were compared between cases and controls using Review Manager Software. In addition, subgroup analysis was conducted based on prior surgery type (rotator cuff repair [RCR], open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF], soft tissue repairs, and not specified) and type of SA (hemiarthroplasty, anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [RTSA]). The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs).

RESULTS

Except for a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who had undergone previous arthroscopic surgery (OR, 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-4.01; p < 0.01), a higher rate of complications was only observed in patients with previous ORIF. These complications included aseptic loosening (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 2.14-5.50; p < 0.01), shoulder dislocation (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.05-4.84; p = 0.04), overall complication (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.38-6.55; p < 0.01), and revision (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.97; p = 0.01). Patients with a history of previous surgery demonstrated inferior functional outcomes in comparison with the control group, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (SMD, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.27; p < 0.01; I2 = 36%), Constant-Murley score (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.24; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), abduction (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 54%), and flexion (SMD, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 40%). Subgroup analysis by previous type of surgery was not possible regarding functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have had prior fracture surgery are at a higher risk of complications, reoperations, and revisions after SA than controls. The normal shoulder anatomy may be disrupted by prior surgery, which makes arthroplasty technically challenging, particularly when it comes to soft tissue balance. On the other hand, RCR before SA did not negatively affect clinical outcomes after RTSA and did not have a higher rate of overall complications (except PJI).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Treatment Studies). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of previous stabilization surgery: a systematic review of matched case control studies at minimum 2 years follow-up

Background

Anterior shoulder instability causes considerable patient morbidity and the volume of shoulder stabilization surgery being performed annually is rising. Despite stabilization surgery, instability arthropathy in the long-term may arise requiring consideration of shoulder arthroplasty. This study evaluated the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty following previous stabilization surgery with their associated changes in bony anatomy or soft tissue structure.

Methods

A systematic review was performed as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify all studies reporting outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of previous stabilization surgery. Studies of >10 patients with a minimum of 24 months follow-up were included.

Results

Overall, 377 shoulder arthroplasties composed of 247 anatomical total shoulder arthroplasties (aTSAs), 102 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs), and 28 hemiarthroplasties (HAs) were reported across 14 included studies at mean age 55.4 years, with 203 compared to 451 control shoulders in 7 matched case-control studies. The mean interval from arthroplasty to stabilization procedure was 19.7 years, with 27.2% of patients having undergone multiple procedures and 39.5% bone transfer procedures. Improvements in patient outcomes were observed both for patients who had underwent aTSA or RTSA, with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score the most commonly used scoring system. Across matched studies comparing to control, large improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons were seen for both aTSA and RTSA implants, 38.1-80.5 and 34.9-82.3, which compared to control groups 38.0-85.5 and 35.5-82.3, respectively. There were differences observed in complication profiles between aTSA and RTSA procedures, with lower revision rates in the short-term to medium-term for RTSA implants in present literature. A significantly higher rate of aTSA revision was observed compared to matched control patients undergoing aTSA for primary osteoarthritis without previous stabilization surgery, 9.4% (13/139) vs. 4.1% (11/269) (P = .044). Aseptic loosening posed a particular challenge in the aTSA group, with significantly higher rates of 5.0% (7/139 f = 54.6 months) compared to control 0.74% (2/269 f = 49.1 months, P = .0088). No significant difference in infection rate was observed between matched study and control groups, 1.5% vs. 2.2% (P = .76).

Conclusion

Shoulder arthroplasty may improve functional outcomes for patients experiencing instability arthropathy with a history of stabilization surgery. Careful consideration of potential complications is warranted both in surgical planning and patient counselling given the altered anatomy and biomechanics, with significantly higher revision and loosening rates observed following aTSA compared to control.

Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of Concurrent or Prior Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the gold standard in management of osteoarthritis (OA) in the setting of rotator cuff pathology. However, there are significant complications associated with the procedure. An alternative option in the setting of a deficient rotator cuff may be to perform a repair prior to or concurrently with an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA).

Methods

A systematic review was performed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate outcomes in aTSA with concomitant or prior rotator cuff repair (RCR). Key outcomes were complication rate and subjective outcome scores.

Results

Seven studies were included in the review. One study found a higher rate of total adverse events in the prior repair group (17% vs 7%, P = .01) while others found no significant difference. There was a nonstatistically significant increase in revision rates among patients with larger tears at time of repair. Prior repair groups were associated with a higher rate of re-tear in one study (13% vs 1%, P = .014). Concomitant repair was associated with a higher rate of loosening. In patients with prior repair, there was no statistical difference in strength, range of motion (ROM), simple shoulder test (SST), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and visual analogue scale (VAS). In patients with concurrent repair, one study demonstrated a less drastic improvement in Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) in "moderate" repairs as opposed to "good" repairs.

Conclusions

Anatomic TSA is an appropriate treatment for glenohumeral OA in patients with a prior successful RCR and in younger patients with concurrent repair of small or medium tears.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

A Systematic Review of Shoulder Arthroplasty in Parkinson's Disease

Background

Parkinson's disease is a degenerative neurological disorder that can cause both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Motor symptoms are associated with increasing the patient's falls risk. Shoulder arthroplasty surgery in this patient cohort is associated with more complications than non-Parkinsonian patients. We sought to identify any increase in complications associated with this patient cohort and any surgical considerations that ought to be taken in light of their disease process.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of articles using PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar. All studies which included any shoulder arthroplasty surgery for patients with Parkinson's disease were included.

Results

Complication rates were higher in patients with Parkinson's disease than in the normal arthroplasty cohort in all studies. There was significant heterogeneity between all 8 studies included in the systematic review. Complication rates ranged from 26% to 100%. Complications included subluxation, loosening, malunion, nonunion, scapular notching, stiffness, fracture, baseplate failure, dislocation, and infection. Reoperation rates ranged from 5% to 29%.

Conclusion

Compared to patients without Parkinson's disease undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, patients with Parkinson's disease achieved similar reductions in pain but inferior clinical function. The range of movement was less predictable, and complication rates were significantly higher in Parkinson's disease patients. This study will aid the surgeon and patient regarding surgical intervention, informed consent, and allow the surgeon to anticipate potential complications of shoulder arthroplasty in this patient cohort.

Prevalence, management, and outcomes of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty: a case-control study and review of the literature

Background

Neurologic injury is a rare and potentially devastating complication of shoulder arthroplasty. Patients typically present with a mixed plexopathy or mononeuropathy, most commonly affecting the axillary and radial nerves. Given the paucity of studies available on the topic, our goal was to elucidate the prevalence of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty and to describe the treatment course and outcomes of neurologic injuries.

Methods

This is a retrospective case-control study performed at a single, urban, academic institution. Consecutive patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020 were reviewed, and patients with a documented nerve injury were identified. A control group of patients without nerve injury were selected in a 2:1 ratio controlling for age and procedure type (TSA vs. RSA; primary vs. revision). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities as per the Charlson Comorbidity Index, radiographic evaluations, surgical and implant details, patient-reported outcome measures, and perioperative complications.

Results

Of 923 patients, 33 (3.6%) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury: 10 (2.1%) after TSA, 23 (5.0%) after RSA, and 3 (7.8%) after revision arthroplasty. Axillary mononeuropathy was most common (42%), followed by brachial plexopathies (18%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, race, body mass index, and preoperative diagnoses between groups. Patients with nerve injury had fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index <3, 33 vs. 65%, P<.001). Patients with nerve injury had higher rates of cervical spine pathology (15 vs. 6%; P = .15) and increased postoperative lateralization (8.9 mm [7.2] vs. 5.5 mm [7.3]; P<.06). The majority (91%) were managed with observation alone. Three (9%) underwent an additional procedure: carpal tunnel release (1, 3%), ulnar nerve decompression (1, 3%), and ulnar nerve transposition (1, 3%) for peripheral compressive neuropathies. At the final follow-up, 19 (57%) nerves fully recovered, and 14 (43%) showed mild residual sensorimotor dysfunction. The mean time to first sign of recovery and ultimate recovery were 11 (7.2) and 36 (23.5) weeks, respectively. At the final follow-up, patients with nerve injury performed worse on patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog score pain (2.2 vs. 1.0, P<.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (67.8 vs. 84.8, P<.001), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (62 vs. 77, P = .009).

Discussion

Nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty is rare, occurring in 3.6% of our patient population. Axillary mononeuropathy and brachial plexopathies are the most common. Most patients can be managed expectantly with observation and will recover at least partial nerve function, although clinical outcomes remain inferior to those without nerve complication.

Preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score Predicts Poor Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Without Arthritis

Limited clinical evidence is available to help to predict poor outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) among patients with massive rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis. A retrospective case-control study was performed for patients who underwent RSA for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis (Hamada score ≤3) and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Preoperative risk factors for poor outcomes were subsequently analyzed. Sixty patients (mean age, 71.4±7.4 years) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 (30%) patients had poor outcomes (case group). The case group had significantly worse postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) (61.6±29.5 vs 84.9±14.1, respectively; P=.002), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (58.9±22.5 vs 82.2±14.2, respectively; P<.001), and Simple Shoulder Test (5.4±3.6 vs 8.5±2.4, respectively; P=.002) scores compared with the control group. Patients with poor outcomes had significantly higher preoperative SANE scores compared with control subjects (40.4±28.4 vs 18.8±15.7, respectively; P=.021). The results of this study suggest that patients with better overall preoperative function, as represented by higher SANE scores, have a greater likelihood of poor functional outcomes after RSA for massive rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis. For these patients, alternative treatment options should be considered. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):215-220.].

A validated algorithm using current literature to judge the appropriateness of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

BACKGROUND

Currently, appropriateness criteria evaluating when to perform total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is lacking. In the absence of society guidelines and limited quality evidence, the RAND/University California in Los Angeles (UCLA) method provides a suitable alternative to evaluate appropriateness and assist in clinical decision making. Given the rise in utilization, appropriateness criteria for TSA have the potential to be an extremely powerful tool for improving quality of care and controlling costs. Thus, the goal of this study was to test explicit criteria to assess the appropriateness of TSA decision making using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

METHODS

A review of recent scientific literature to gather available evidence about the use, effectiveness, efficiency, and the risks involved in surgical intervention was performed by a shoulder/elbow fellowship trained physician. Based on pertinent variables including age, rotator cuff status, previous surgical management, mobility, symptomatology, and imaging classifications, 186 clinical scenarios were created. Appropriateness criteria for TSA were developed using a modified Delphi method with a panel consisting of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) members. A second panel of ASES members rated the same scenarios, with reliability testing performed to compare groups.

RESULTS

Panel members reached agreement in 40 (64%) indications. TSA was appropriate in 15 (24%) of indications. For patients with severe symptomatology, TSA was often appropriate for patients aged <75 years and inconclusive or inappropriate for patients aged >75 years. Among patients aged <65 years, TSA varied between appropriate and inconclusive, often dependent on Walch classification. For patients with moderate symptomatology, TSA was inappropriate or inconclusive for patients aged <65 or >75 years. When compared to the second panel's results, moderate agreement was obtained with a weighted kappa statistic of 0.56.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the RAND/UCLA method, ASES members created an appropriateness decision tree for pertinent patient variables. This presents the data in a manner that streamlines the clinical decision-making process and allows for rapid and more reliable determination of appropriateness for practitioners. The decision tree is based on a combination of clinical experience from high-volume ASES-member surgeons and a comprehensive review of current evidence. This tool can be used as part of a broader set of factors, including individual patient characteristics, prior studies, and expert opinion, to inform clinical decision making, improve quality of care, and control costs.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

Tendon transfers (TTs) can be successful for the management of selected posterosuperior functionally irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, when these procedures fail to provide adequate pain relief or functional improvement, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly considered the next treatment option. The effect of prior TT on RSA remains largely unknown. The purposes of this investigation were to evaluate the outcomes of RSA after previous TT performed for posterosuperior functionally irreparable rotator cuff tears and to determine the effect of various TT types on RSA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2 institutional databases identified 33 patients who underwent RSA implantation between 2006 and 2019 with a previous failed tendon transfer (FTT) of the shoulder and at least 2 years of clinical follow-up. FTTs included 21 latissimus dorsi transfers, 6 latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD-TM) transfers, and 6 lower trapezius transfers. RSAs were performed at an average of 5.5 years (range, 0.3-28 years) after FTT, with a mean follow-up period of 4.1 ± 2.0 years. Outcomes evaluated included the visual analog scale pain score, range of motion, absolute Constant-Murley score (CS) and relative CS, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Subjective Shoulder Value, complications, and implant survivorship free of reoperation or revision.

RESULTS

RSA significantly improved pain and function, with improvements in the visual analog scale pain score (6.2 preoperatively vs. 2.2 at most recent follow-up, P < .001), active elevation (85° vs. 111°, P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (51 vs. 74, P = .001), absolute CS (34 vs. 48, P = .003), and relative CS (42% vs. 59%, P = .002), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference threshold. There were 7 complications (21%) across the entire cohort, with dislocation (n = 3, 9.1%) as the most common complication. Comparison across TT groups showed that LD-TM transfer had the highest complication rate (3 shoulders, 50%), followed by lower trapezius transfer (1 shoulder, 16.7%); latissimus dorsi transfer had the lowest rate (3 shoulders, 14.3%; P = .037). Survivorship free of revision or reoperation was estimated to be 90.1% at 1 year, 84.9% at 2 years, and 71.2% at 5 years, with no difference among TT groups (P = .654).

CONCLUSIONS

RSA can serve as a viable salvage option for FTT procedures. At mid-term follow-up, RSA led to significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Patients with prior LD-TM transfers may have a higher complication rate, but no other differences were found between TT groups.

Development and validation of a predictive model for outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis of nearly 2000 patients

BACKGROUND

Guiding expectations following shoulder arthroplasty is important in improving patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model to calculate 2-year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores in shoulder arthroplasty patients from a comprehensive set of preoperative patient factors and types of arthroplasty performed.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 1947 shoulder arthroplasties performed from 2010 to 2015 at 3 high-volume centers. Twenty-six variables were evaluated for an association with 2-year ASES scores, and variables with P < .20 in our pair-wise analysis were used to develop a predictive model. The prediction root-mean-square error was calculated. External validation was performed using data from 233 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty performed by a separate shoulder surgeon at a center not involved with creation of the predictive model.

RESULTS

A total of 1947 patients were analyzed, and their data were used to construct the predictive model. Variables most associated with 2-year ASES scores were patient age, preoperative ASES score, disability, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol use, anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and primary vs. revision shoulder arthroplasty. By use of cross validation, the prediction error was 20.1, the proportion of variance explained was 25.3%, the mean absolute error was 15.9, and the C statistic for the linear regression model was 0.66. After external validation, the mean difference between predicted and actual 2-year ASES scores was 12.7 points, within the accepted minimal clinically important difference after shoulder arthroplasty.

DISCUSSION

Data from nearly 2000 shoulder arthroplasties allowed the development and validation of a model to predict 2-year ASES scores following shoulder arthroplasty. The model was accurate within the minimal clinically important difference in 85% of patients.

Cement augmentation of suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair improves pullout strength: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Rotator cuff pathology is a growing concern in the ageing population. If cement augmentation of suture anchors improves pullout strength, its application can potentially be applied in cases of poor bone quality to prevent anchor failure.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical benefits and fixation strength of cement-augmented versus non-augmented suture anchors in the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair (RCR).

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed to identify all published articles reporting on biomechanical analysis of suture anchors in the shoulder in a cadaveric model. Inclusion criteria required fresh-frozen specimens, placement in the footprint of the proximal humerus, and comparative assessment of fixation constructs with or without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or bioabsorbable composite cement augmentation. Biomechanical testing procedure, cement augmentation method and pullout force were assessed.

FINDINGS

After review of 105 abstracts, seven full manuscripts met inclusion criteria. Six of seven studies reported statistically significant differences in mean pullout force between augmented (three PMMAs, three composites, one PMMA vs composite) and non-augmented anchors. Of two studies evaluating cycles to failure, both found a significant increase in the augmented versus non-augmented anchors. Of two studies stratifying by anchor position, both investigations identified significant differences in mean pullout strength between augmented and non-augmented anchors at the posteromedial and anterolateral anchor positions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Cement augmentation of suture anchors in cadaveric humeri for RCR improves pullout strength regardless of cement type used or anchor position. Cement augmentation may provide a viable option for future clinical application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.

Prior shoulder surgery and rheumatoid arthritis increase early risk of infection after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly popular surgery for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, unreconstructible proximal humeral fracture, and end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. The increased annual volume of RTSAs has resulted in more postoperative complications and revision rates between 3.3% and 10.1%. Postoperative infection is one of the most common complications requiring revision surgery after primary RTSA. This study assesses patient-specific risk factors for development of early infection after primary RTSA in a single high-volume shoulder arthroplasty institution.

Methods

From 2014 to 2019, 902 consecutive primary RTSAs were performed for surgical treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy, glenohumeral arthritis, inflammatory arthropathy, and/or dislocation. Excluding proximal humeral or scapula fractures, 756 cases met the inclusion criteria and had a minimum of 3-month follow-up. All surgeries were performed using the same surgical technique and received similar antibiotic prophylaxis. Age, patient demographics, medical history, smoking history, and prior ipsilateral shoulder treatment and/or surgery were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors associated with development of postoperative shoulder infection.

Results

Thirty-five patients did not meet minimum follow-up criteria and were lost to follow-up. Overall, of 721, 22 patients (3%) developed a postoperative ipsilateral shoulder infection. Previous nonarthroplasty surgery and history of rheumatoid arthritis were significantly associated with the development of postoperative shoulder infection. Amongst 196 patients who had previous nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery, there were 12 postoperative shoulder infections (6%) compared with those without previous shoulder surgery (10 of 525, 2%) (P = .003). Among 58 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, there were 5 postoperative shoulder infections (9%) compared with patients without rheumatoid arthritis (17 of 663, 3%) (P = .010). Patient age, gender, smoking status, history of diabetes mellitus, history of cancer/immunosuppression, and prior cortisone injection did not demonstrate significant associations with the development of postoperative infection.

Conclusion

Prior nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery and/or rheumatoid arthritis are independently associated with the development of postoperative infection after primary RTSA. Patients who demonstrate these risk factors should be appropriately evaluated and preoperatively counseled before undergoing primary RTSA. Strong consideration should be given to avoid minimally invasive nonarthroplasty surgery as a temporizing measure to delay definitive RTSA.

Anatomic versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up comparison

BACKGROUND

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty improves pain and function with a reported reoperation rate of approximately 1% per year. With improved glenoid fixation, reverse shoulder arthroplasty implants may outperform anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. We evaluate the functional outcomes and reoperation rate of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a minimum eight-year follow-up or revision.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2010, 187 shoulders (137 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, 50 reverse shoulder arthroplasty) were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 8.8 years. The mean age at surgery was 67 years. Females were more commonly treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Both groups had similar body mass index and comorbidities. Outcome measures evaluated included abduction, forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder score, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

RESULTS

At follow-up, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrated greater overhead range of motion and external rotation. All patient-reported outcomes remained similar between groups. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients were more likely to rate shoulders as much better or better after surgery (90% versus 67%, p = 0.004). Complications were observed in 24% of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties and 8% of reverse shoulder arthroplasties (p = 0.02). Reoperation was more common in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (23% versus 4%, p = 0.003).

DISCUSSION

At mid-to-long-term follow-up, reverse shoulder arthroplasties demonstrated significantly fewer complications and reoperations than anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. Despite similar patient-reported outcomes, reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients were more likely to be satisfied with their shoulder.

Preoperative characteristics predictive of PROMIS Pain Interference two years after shoulder surgery

Introduction

The objective of this study was to identify preoperative characteristics associated with worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) two years after shoulder surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 293 patients who underwent elective shoulder surgery. Survey questionnaires were collected within one week of surgery and then two years postoperatively. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations and multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables.

Results

Worse two-year PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with older age, higher BMI, greater comorbidities, more prior surgeries, and multiple socio-demographic factors. Less improvement in PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with greater comorbidities, more previous surgeries, unemployment, prior orthopaedic surgery on the operative joint, and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Better scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with better two-year PROMIS PI. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that worse two-year PROMIS PI was independently predicted by the following preoperative factors: Workers' Compensation claim, opioid use, worse whole body Numeric Pain Score, and worse PROMIS PI. Less improvement in two-year PROMIS PI was predicted by the same preoperative factors.

Conclusion

Worse PROMIS PI after shoulder surgery was associated with older age, greater comorbidities, mental health impairment, and lower socioeconomic status. Preoperative predictors of worse pain interference two years after shoulder surgery included Workers' Compensation, opioid use, worse whole body pain, and worse PROMIS PI.

Level of evidence

III.

Variation in the value of total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in maximizing value for patients undergoing discretionary orthopedic surgery but little data to guide improvement efforts. Integrating patient-reported outcomes with time-driven activity-based costing, we explored patient-level variation in the value of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and characterized factors that contribute to this variation.

METHODS

Using our institutional registry, we identified 239 patients undergoing elective primary TSA (anatomic or reverse) between 2016-2017 with minimum 2-year follow-up. We calculated value as 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores divided by hospitalization time-driven activity-based costs. This number was multiplied by a constant to set the minimum value of TSA to 100. Multivariable linear regression modeling was performed to characterize factors underlying variation in value.

RESULTS

The value of shoulder arthroplasty ranged from 100 to 680, resulting in a variation of 580%. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty was associated with decreased value (79-point decrease vs. anatomic arthroplasty; P < .001; partial R² = 0.089), as were prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery (38-point decrease; P = .002; partial R² = 0.031), more self-reported allergies (4-point decrease per 1-unit increase; P = .029; partial R² = 0.015), diabetes (33-point decrease; P = .045; partial R² = 0.013), and lower preoperative ASES score (0.7-point increase per 1-unit increase; P = .045; partial R² = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed wide variation in the value of shoulder arthroplasty that was most strongly associated with procedure type and certain preoperative characteristics (eg, prior shoulder surgery, number of self-reported allergies, diabetes, ASES score). Awareness of these associations is important for implementation of targeted strategies to effectively reduce variation and redirect resources toward higher-value, cost-conscious care.

Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient does not negatively impact the outcome of subsequent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of prior arthroscopic management of glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient on results of subsequent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Forty-three patients that had a total shoulder or ream-and-run arthroplasty with a history of arthroscopic management were matched to 86 patients without prior surgery. Each case was matched to two cases without prior arthroscopic surgery with similar age, sex, Walch classification, and type of arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with a history of arthroscopic management were matched to 86 patients without prior surgery. The mean two year SST scores (10.3 vs. 9.9, p = 0.334), % MPI (75.4 vs. 73.0%, p = 0.687), two year SANE scores (79.6 vs. 79.8, p = 0.953), and % of patients to exceed SST score MCID (89 vs. 91%, p = 0.860) and SANE score MCID (86 vs. 75%, p = 0.180) were statistically similar in patients with prior arthroscopic debridement compared with those without prior arthroscopic debridement. The rate of MUA (9 vs. 6%, p = 0.480) and open revision (9 vs. 8%, p = 1.000) were statistically similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral arthritis in patients aged 65 years and younger prior to anatomic shoulder arthroplasty was not associated with inferior outcomes for either total shoulder arthroplasty or ream-and-run arthroplasty.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty After Previous Arthroscopic Surgery for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Case-Control Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

When comprehensive arthroscopic management (CAM) for glenohumeral osteoarthritis fails, total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) may be needed, and it remains unknown whether previous CAM adversely affects outcomes after subsequent TSA.

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent TSA as a primary procedure with those who underwent TSA after CAM (CAM-TSA).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients younger than 70 years who underwent primary TSA or CAM-TSA and were at least 2 years postoperative were included. A total of 21 patients who underwent CAM-TSA were matched to 42 patients who underwent primary TSA by age, sex, and grade of osteoarthritis. Intraoperative blood loss and surgical time were assessed. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores were collected preoperatively and at final follow-up including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), visual analog scale, and patient satisfaction. Revision arthroplasty was defined as failure.

RESULTS

Of 63 patients, 56 of them (19 CAM-TSA and 37 primary TSA; 88.9%) were available for follow-up. There were 16 female (28.6%) and 40 male (71.4%) patients with a mean age of 57.8 years (range, 38.8-66.7 years). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss (P > .999) or surgical time (P = .127) between the groups. There were 4 patients (7.1%) who had failure, and failure rates did not differ significantly between the CAM-TSA (5.3%; n = 1) and primary TSA (8.1%; n = 3) groups (P > .999). Additionally, 2 patients underwent revision arthroplasty because of trauma. A total of 50 patients who did not experience failure (17 CAM-TSA and 33 primary TSA) completed PRO measures at a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 2.0-11.5 years), with no significant difference between the CAM-TSA (4.4 years [range, 2.1-10.5 years]) and primary TSA (5.0 years [range, 2.0-11.5 years]) groups (P = .164). Both groups improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively in all PRO scores (P < .05). No significant differences in any median PRO scores between the CAM-TSA and primary TSA groups, respectively, were seen at final follow-up: ASES: 89.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 74.9-96.6) versus 94.1 (IQR, 74.9-98.3) (P = .545); SANE: 84.0 (IQR, 74.0-94.0) versus 91.5 (IQR, 75.3-99.0) (P = .246); QuickDASH: 9.0 (IQR, 3.4-27.3) versus 9.0 (IQR, 5.1-18.1) (P = .921); SF-12 PCS: 53.8 (IQR, 50.1-57.1) versus 49.3 (IQR, 41.2-56.5) (P = .065); and patient satisfaction: 9.5 (IQR, 7.3-10.0) versus 9.0 (IQR, 5.3-10.0) (P = .308).

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis who failed previous CAM benefited similarly from TSA compared with patients who opted directly for TSA.

Decreased complication profile and improved clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after 2010: A systematic review

The purpose of this review was to update the complication profile of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) post-2010, given greater procedural familiarity, improved learning curves, enhanced implant designs, and increased attention to the nuances of patient selection. Three electronic databases were searched and screened in duplicate from 1 January 2010 to 16 December 2018 based on predetermined criteria. Twenty-two studies examining 1455 patients (26% male; mean age: 73.4 ± 3.6; mean follow-up: 23.4 ± 14.3 months) were reviewed. Post-operative motion ranged a mean 122.4° ± 11.5° flexion, 109° ± 19.4° abduction, and 33° ± 11.2°/41° ± 5° external/internal rotation. Post-operative mean Constant score was 58.9 ± 10.1, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon score was 73.4 ± 6.1, Simple Shoulder Test score was 63.5 ± 6.5, and a Visual Analog Scale pain score was 1.6 ± 0.9. The overall complication rate was 18.2% and major complication rate was 15.4%. Compared to pre-2010, the overall complication rate of 18.2% is lower than previous rates of 19%-68%, with the rate of "major" complications dropping three-fold from 15.4% to 4.6%. The data suggest that rTSA is a safe and efficacious alternative to aTSA and HA, and the "stale" nature of previous complication profiles are points fundamental to perioperative discussions surrounding rTSA.

Impact of previous non-arthroplasty surgery on clinical outcomes after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to address the following questions regarding previous non-arthroplasty surgery prior to primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (either total shoulder arthroplasty [TSA] or ream-and-run arthroplasty): (1) To what degree is primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty after prior non-arthroplasty surgery associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher revision rates compared with arthroplasty without previous surgery? (2) Does type, approach, or timing of previous surgery affect outcomes after anatomic arthroplasty?

METHODS

A retrospective review of a primary shoulder arthroplasty database was performed and identified 640 patients undergoing anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (345 TSAs and 295 ream-and-run arthroplasties). Of these patients, 183 (29%) underwent previous non-arthroplasty surgery. Baseline and demographic information, 2-year postoperative outcome scores, and revision surgical procedures with associated culture results were collected.

RESULTS

In patients undergoing TSA, previous non-arthroplasty surgery was associated with a significantly lower 2-year Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score (P = .010), percentage maximum possible improvement (MPI) (P = .024), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score (P < .001) and a higher rate of reoperation (P < .001). In patients undergoing ream-and-run arthroplasty, previous non-arthroplasty surgery was associated with a nonsignificantly lower 2-year SST score, percentage MPI, and SANE score and higher reoperation rate. Prior fracture surgery carried a higher risk of reoperation than other types of surgery including rotator cuff repair and instability surgery. Among TSA and ream-and-run arthroplasty cases with prior non-arthroplasty surgery, prior open surgery and the time interval from most recent surgery were associated with nonsignificant differences in the 2-year SST score, percentage MPI, SANE score, and revision risk.

CONCLUSION

Previous surgery is associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher revision rates in patients undergoing index TSA but not in those undergoing the ream-and-run procedure. Patients with previous fracture surgery carry the highest risk of reoperation.

The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II

Background

Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous.

Methods

Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Results

The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; P < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; P = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%.

Conclusions

Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.

Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a procedure that has been increasingly utilized since its inception over 20 years ago. The purpose of this review is to present the most up to date practice and advances to the RTSA literature from the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature on RTSA has focused on identifying complications, maximizing outcomes, and determining its cost-effectiveness. RTSA has become a valuable tool in the treatment of various shoulder pathologies from fractures to massive-irreparable rotator cuff tears. Maximizing outcomes, proper patient counseling, and limiting complications are vital to a successful procedure. RTSA can be a difficult procedure; however, when utilized appropriately, it can be an invaluable tool in the orthopedic surgeon's armament. Recent evidence suggests, more and more, that RTSA not only provides value to the patient, but it is also cost-effective.