1
|
Sahoo S, Entezari V, Ho JC, Jun BJ, Jin Y, Imrey PB, Derwin KA, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Disease diagnosis and arthroplasty type are strongly associated with short-term postoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e308-e321. [PMID: 38430979 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic factors for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) clinical outcomes are incompletely understood. This study investigates the associations of preoperative patient, disease-specific, and surgical factors with 1-year postoperative PENN Shoulder Score (PSS) in patients undergoing primary TSA. METHODS Cleveland Clinic patients undergoing primary anatomic TSA (aTSA) or reverse TSA (rTSA) for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) or rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) between February 2015 and August 2019, and having complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), were included. Twenty preselected preoperative patient, disease-specific, and surgical factors were used to fit multivariable models for 1-year PSS and its subscores. RESULTS Of 1427 eligible primary TSAs, 1174 had 1-year follow-up by PROMs (82%), with 1042 analyzed after additional exclusions, including 30% rTSAs for CTA (n = 308), 26% rTSAs for GHOA (n = 275), and 44% aTSAs for GHOA (n = 459). All PROMs showed statistically significant improvements postoperatively, with 89% of patients reaching an acceptable symptom state. Lower 1-year PSS was associated with younger age, female sex, current smoking, chronic pain diagnosis, history of prior surgery, worker's compensation claim, lower preoperative mental health, lower baseline PSS, absence of glenoid bone loss, and diagnosis-arthroplasty type (CTA-rTSA < GHOA-rTSA < GHOA-aTSA). The most important prognostic factors associated with 1-year PSS were diagnosis-arthroplasty type, baseline mental health status, and insurance status. CONCLUSIONS Disease diagnosis, arthroplasty type, and several other baseline factors are strongly and individually associated with PROMs following primary TSA, with patients undergoing aTSA for GHOA demonstrating the highest PROM scores at 1-year follow-up. Patient, disease-specific, and surgical factors can be used to guide postoperative prognosis following primary TSA for improved preoperative patient counseling regarding expected outcomes of these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jason C Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter B Imrey
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen A Derwin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klifto CS, Cheung EV, Holcomb JO, Frankle MA, Duralde XA, MacDonald PB, Ricchetti ET, Aibinder WR, Amini MH, Barnes LF, Byram IR, Chalmers PN, Chuinard CR, Friedman A, Gilotra M, Gregory JM, Grogan BF, Horneff JG, Kassam H, Kazanjian JE, Kilcoyne KG, Kowalsky MS, Li X, Liu JN, Muh SJ, Munoz J, Patterson B, Phipatanakul WP, Ward AM, Waterman BR, Woodmass JM, Wright M. Are leaders born to lead, or are they made? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:531-535. [PMID: 37777042 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Klifto
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Emilie V Cheung
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Jason O Holcomb
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Mark A Frankle
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Xavier A Duralde
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Peter B MacDonald
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - William R Aibinder
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Michael H Amini
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Leslie F Barnes
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Ian R Byram
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Peter N Chalmers
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | | | - Alan Friedman
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Mohit Gilotra
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - James M Gregory
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Brian F Grogan
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - John G Horneff
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Hafiz Kassam
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Jack E Kazanjian
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Kelly G Kilcoyne
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Marc S Kowalsky
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Xinning Li
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Joseph N Liu
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Stephanie J Muh
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Julianne Munoz
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Brendan Patterson
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | | | - Abner M Ward
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Brian R Waterman
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Jarret M Woodmass
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| | - Melissa Wright
- The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Leadership Development Program
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diaz MA, Hutchinson AJ, Ricchetti ET, Hsu JE, Garrigues GE, Gutiérrez S, Frankle MA. How to avoid baseplate failure: the effect of compression and reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on implant stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:389-398. [PMID: 37689101 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to achieve fixation of the glenoid baseplate will lead to clinical failure. The fixation of the baseplate to the scapula must be able to withstand sufficient shear forces to allow bony ingrowth. The importance of compression to neutralize the forces at the baseplate-bone interface has been assumed to be critical in limiting excessive micromotion. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of compression on implant stability with different baseplate designs. METHODS Various baseplate designs (1-piece monolithic central screw [1P], 2-piece locking central screw [2PL], and 2-piece nonlocking center screw [2PNL]) were investigated at 3 different compressive forces (high [810 N], medium [640 N], and low [530 N]). Synthetic bone cylinders were instrumented, and peripheral screws were used in all models. The combination of 1 locking and 3 nonlocking peripheral screw fixation was selected as worst-case scenario. Dynamic testing protocol followed the ASTM F2028-17 standard. The baseplate micromotion at high compression was compared to low compression. Additionally, the baseplate micromotion for each design was compared at baseline (first 50 cycles) and at 10,000 cycles for the 3 different compressive forces where motion above 150 μm was defined as failure. RESULTS Baseplate micromotion was found to negatively correlate with compression (rpb = -0.83, P < .0001). At baseline, all baseplate designs were considered stable, regardless of compression. With high compression, average micromotion at the glenoid baseplate-bone interface remained below the 150-μm threshold for all baseplate designs at 10,000 cycles (1P: 50 ± 10 μm; 2PL: 78 ± 32 μm; 2PNL: 79 ± 8 μm; P = .060). With medium compression, average micromotion at 10,000 cycles for all 3 designs remained below the 150-μm threshold (1P: 88 ± 22 μm; 2PL: 132 ± 26 μm; 2PNL: 107 ± 39 μm). The 2PL design had the highest amount of micromotion (P = .013). With low compression, both 2-piece designs had an average micromotion above the 150-μm threshold whereas the 1-piece design did not (1P: 133 ± 35 μm; 2PL: 183 ± 21 μm; 2PNL: 166 ± 39 μm). The 2PL design had significantly higher micromotion when compared to 1P design (P = .041). DISCUSSION The stability of a central screw baseplate correlates with the amount of compression obtained and is affected by implant design. For the same amount of compression, more micromotion is observed in a 2-piece design than a 1-piece design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Diaz
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Mark A Frankle
- Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lohre R, Swanson DP, Mahendraraj KA, Elmallah R, Glass EA, Dunn WR, Cannon DJ, Friedman LGM, Gaudette JA, Green J, Grobaty L, Gutman M, Kakalecik J, Kloby MA, Konrade EN, Knack MC, Loveland A, Mathew JI, Myhre L, Nyfeler J, Parsell DE, Pazik M, Polisetty TS, Ponnuru P, Smith KM, Sprengel KA, Thakar O, Turnbull L, Vaughan A, Wheelwright JC, Abboud J, Armstrong A, Austin L, Brolin T, Entezari V, Garrigues GE, Grawe B, Gulotta LV, Hobgood R, Horneff JG, Iannotti J, Khazzam M, King JJ, Kirsch JM, Levy JC, Murthi A, Namdari S, Nicholson GP, Otto RJ, Ricchetti ET, Tashjian R, Throckmorton T, Wright T, Jawa A. Predictors of dislocations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES complications of RSA multicenter research group. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:73-81. [PMID: 37379964 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is one of the most frequent complications and remains a clinical challenge. Current evidence is limited by small sample size, single-center, or single-implant methodologies that limit generalizability. We sought to determine the incidence and patient-related risk factors for dislocation after RSA, using a large, multicenter cohort with varying implants. METHODS A retrospective, multicenter study was performed involving 15 institutions and 24 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons members across the United States. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing primary or revision RSA between January 2013 and June 2019 with minimum 3-month follow-up. All definitions, inclusion criteria, and collected variables were determined using the Delphi method, an iterative survey process involving all primary investigators requiring at least 75% consensus to be considered a final component of the methodology for each study element. Dislocations were defined as complete loss of articulation between the humeral component and the glenosphere and required radiographic confirmation. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine patient predictors of postoperative dislocation after RSA. RESULTS We identified 6621 patients who met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 19.4 months (range: 3-84 months). The study population was 40% male with an average age of 71.0 years (range: 23-101 years). The rate of dislocation was 2.1% (n = 138) for the whole cohort, 1.6% (n = 99) for primary RSAs, and 6.5% (n = 39) for revision RSAs (P < .001). Dislocations occurred at a median of 7.0 weeks (interquartile range: 3.0-36.0 weeks) after surgery with 23.0% (n = 32) after a trauma. Patients with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff had an overall lower rate of dislocation than patients with other diagnoses (0.8% vs. 2.5%; P < .001). Patient-related factors independently predictive of dislocation, in order of the magnitude of effect, were a history of postoperative subluxations before radiographically confirmed dislocation (odds ratio [OR]: 19.52, P < .001), primary diagnosis of fracture nonunion (OR: 6.53, P < .001), revision arthroplasty (OR: 5.61, P < .001), primary diagnosis of rotator cuff disease (OR: 2.64, P < .001), male sex (OR: 2.21, P < .001), and no subscapularis repair at surgery (OR: 1.95, P = .001). CONCLUSION The strongest patient-related factors associated with dislocation were a history of postoperative subluxations and having a primary diagnosis of fracture nonunion. Notably, RSAs for osteoarthritis showed lower rates of dislocations than RSAs for rotator cuff disease. These data can be used to optimize patient counseling before RSA, particularly in male patients undergoing revision RSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Lohre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel P Swanson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kuhan A Mahendraraj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Randa Elmallah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan A Glass
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Fondren Orthopaedic Group, Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dylan J Cannon
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Lisa G M Friedman
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jaina A Gaudette
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John Green
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lauren Grobaty
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jaquelyn Kakalecik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael A Kloby
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elliot N Konrade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Margaret C Knack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Amy Loveland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joshua I Mathew
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Luke Myhre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jacob Nyfeler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Doug E Parsell
- Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Marissa Pazik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Karch M Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Ocean Thakar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lacie Turnbull
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - John C Wheelwright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Joseph Abboud
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Luke Austin
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tyler Brolin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Grawe
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Rhett Hobgood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John G Horneff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jacob M Kirsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan C Levy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Levy Shoulder Center at Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Anand Murthi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Randall J Otto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert Tashjian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Thomas Throckmorton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Thomas Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lohre R, Swanson DP, Mahendraraj KA, Elmallah R, Glass EA, Dunn WR, Cannon DJ, Friedman LG, Gaudette JA, Green J, Grobaty L, Gutman M, Kakalecik J, Kloby MA, Konrade EN, Knack MC, Loveland A, Mathew JI, Myhre L, Nyfeler J, Parsell DE, Pazik M, Polisetty TS, Ponnuru P, Smith KM, Sprengel KA, Thakar O, Turnbull L, Vaughan A, Wheelwright JC, Abboud J, Armstrong A, Austin L, Brolin T, Entezari V, Garrigues GE, Grawe B, Gulotta LV, Hobgood R, Horneff JG, Iannotti J, Khazzam M, King JJ, Kirsch JM, Levy JC, Murthi A, Namdari S, Nicholson GP, Otto RJ, Ricchetti ET, Tashjian R, Throckmorton T, Wright T, Jawa A. Risk factors of acromial and scapular spine stress fractures differ by indication: a study by the ASES Complications of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Multicenter Research Group. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2483-2492. [PMID: 37330167 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both patient and implant related variables have been implicated in the incidence of acromial (ASF) and scapular spine fractures (SSF) following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA); however, previous studies have not characterized nor differentiated risk profiles for varying indications including primary glenohumeral arthritis with intact rotator cuff (GHOA), rotator cuff arthropathy (CTA), and massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (MCT). The purpose of this study was to determine patient factors predictive of cumulative ASF/SSF risk for varying preoperative diagnosis and rotator cuff status. METHODS Patients consecutively receiving RSA between January 2013 and June 2019 from 15 institutions comprising 24 members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) with primary, preoperative diagnoses of GHOA, CTA and MCT were included for study. Inclusion criteria, definitions, and inclusion of patient factors in a multivariate model to predict cumulative risk of ASF/SSF were determined through an iterative Delphi process. The CTA and MCT groups were combined for analysis. Consensus was defined as greater than 75% agreement amongst contributors. Only ASF/SSF confirmed by clinical and radiographic correlation were included for analysis. RESULTS Our study cohort included 4764 patients with preoperative diagnoses of GHOA, CTA, or MCT with minimum follow-up of 3 months (range: 3-84). The incidence of cumulative stress fracture was 4.1% (n = 196). The incidence of stress fracture in the GHOA cohort was 2.1% (n = 34/1637) compared to 5.2% (n = 162/3127) (P < .001) in the CTA/MCT cohort. Presence of inflammatory arthritis (odds ratio [OR] 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-7.78; P = .035) was the sole predictive factor of stress fractures in GHOA, compared with inflammatory arthritis (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.89; P = .016), female sex (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.20-2.72; P = .007), and osteoporosis (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02-2.37; P = .003) in the CTA/MCT cohort. CONCLUSION Preoperative diagnosis of GHOA has a different risk profile for developing stress fractures after RSA than patients with CTA/MCT. Though rotator cuff integrity is likely protective against ASF/SSF, approximately 1/46 patients receiving RSA with primary GHOA will have this complication, primarily influenced by a history of inflammatory arthritis. Understanding risk profiles of patients undergoing RSA by varying diagnosis is important in counseling, expectation management, and treatment by surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Lohre
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel P Swanson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kuhan A Mahendraraj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Randa Elmallah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan A Glass
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Warren R Dunn
- Fondren Orthopaedic Group, Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dylan J Cannon
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Lisa Gm Friedman
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jaina A Gaudette
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John Green
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lauren Grobaty
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jaquelyn Kakalecik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael A Kloby
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elliot N Konrade
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Biomedical Engineering, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Margaret C Knack
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Biomedical Engineering, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Amy Loveland
- MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Luke Myhre
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jacob Nyfeler
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Doug E Parsell
- Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Marissa Pazik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Karch M Smith
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Ocean Thakar
- MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lacie Turnbull
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Joseph Abboud
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Luke Austin
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tyler Brolin
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Biomedical Engineering, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Grawe
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Rhett Hobgood
- Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Jackson, MS, USA
| | | | - Joseph Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jacob M Kirsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan C Levy
- Levy Shoulder Center at Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Anand Murthi
- MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Randall J Otto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert Tashjian
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Thomas Throckmorton
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Biomedical Engineering, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Thomas Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim HM, Hsu JE, Ricchetti ET. What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1567-1573. [PMID: 37616391 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Mike Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sahoo S, Derwin KA, Jin Y, Imrey PB, Ricchetti ET, Entezari V, Iannotti JP, Spindler KP, Ho JC. One-year patient-reported outcomes following primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair vary little by surgeon. JSES Int 2023; 7:568-573. [PMID: 37426918 PMCID: PMC10328782 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study's purpose was to investigate the extent to which differences among operating surgeons may influence 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery, after controlling for general and disease-specific patient factors. We hypothesized that surgeon would be additionally associated with 1-year PROMs, specifically the baseline to 1-year improvement in Penn Shoulder Score (PSS). Methods We used mixed multivariable statistical modeling to assess the influence of surgeon (and alternatively surgical case volume) on 1-year PSS improvement in patients undergoing RCR at a single health system in 2018, controlling for eight patient- and six disease-specific preoperative factors as possible confounders. Contributions of predictors to explaining variation in 1-year PSS improvement were measured and compared using Akaike's Information Criterion. Results 518 cases performed by 28 surgeons met inclusion criteria, with median (quartiles) baseline PSS of 41.9 (31.9, 53.9) and 1-year PSS improvement of 42 (29.1, 55.3) points. Contrary to expectation, surgeon and surgical case volume were neither statistically significantly nor clinically meaningfully associated with 1-year PSS improvement. Baseline PSS and mental health status (VR-12 MCS) were the dominant and only statistically significant predictors of 1-year PSS improvement, with lower baseline PSS and higher VR-12 MCS predicting larger 1-year PSS improvement. Conclusion Patients generally reported excellent 1-year outcomes following primary RCR. This study did not find evidence that the individual surgeon or surgeon case volume influences 1-year PROMs, independently of case-mix factors, following primary RCR in a large employed hospital system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter B. Imrey
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Jason C. Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Churchill JL, Paez CJ, Entezari V, Ricchetti ET, Ho JC. Understanding Medical Optimization for Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:309-318. [PMID: 37271559 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Many surgeons seek to optimize their patients' comorbid conditions preoperatively to reduce postoperative complications. To effectively optimize patients before total shoulder arthroplasty, the surgeon should be familiar with recognizing and treating common medical comorbidities found in an orthopedic patient including anemia, diabetes, malnutrition, cardiovascular conditions, and history of deep venous thrombosis. Screening for depression or other mental illness should also be conducted preoperatively and managed accordingly before surgery. Preoperative opioid use and smoking have significant effects on postoperative outcomes and should be addressed before surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Churchill
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A40, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Conner J Paez
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A40, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A40, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A40, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jason C Ho
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, A40, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Basdavanos A, Maurer MS, Ives L, Derwin K, Ricchetti ET, Seitz W, Hanna M. Prevalence of Orthopedic Manifestations in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis With a Focus on Shoulder Pathologies. Am J Cardiol 2023; 190:67-74. [PMID: 36566619 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is a restrictive cardiomyopathy that has been associated with multiple orthopedic pathologies years before it manifests in the heart. There have been no studies on the prevalence of a wide range of shoulder pathologies in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Due to the preferential deposition of transthyretin in the soft tissues and joints, we predicted a greater prevalence of shoulder pathologies and other orthopedic manifestations in patients with ATTR-CA. This single-center, retrospective, case-control study, analyzed 1,310 patients with CA, 830 with ATTR-CA, and 480 with light-chain CA (AL-CA) from a dedicated CA REDcap database. Odds ratios comparing patients with CA to the age-matched published estimate of over 300 million patients in the general population were determined for shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasty. Years between a patient's first shoulder pathology (i.e., shoulder arthroplasty) and the year of their diagnosis with CA were determined using data from patients with a known date of surgery. Overall, patients with ATTR-CA compared with patients with AL-CA presented more frequently with shoulder pathologies (p <0.001) and at least 1 orthopedic manifestation (p <0.001). The odds of patients with ATTR-CA and AL-CA aged 60 years or older who underwent shoulder arthroplasty was 6.05 times greater (95% confidence interval 4.26 to 8.60) and 1.63 times greater (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 3.94), respectively, compared with age-matched controls. Shoulder pathologies and concomitant orthopedic pathologies are common in patients with ATTR-CA and may help identify patients with CA earlier in their disease progression for earlier intervention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Basdavanos
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mathew S Maurer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lauren Ives
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kathleen Derwin
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - William Seitz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mazen Hanna
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cogan CJ, Ho JC, Entezari V, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. The Influence of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Design on Biomechanics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2023; 16:95-102. [PMID: 36735182 PMCID: PMC9944260 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09820-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As reverse total shoulder arthroplasty indications have expanded and the incidence of its use has increased, developments in implant design have been a critical component of its success. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent literature regarding the effect of implant design on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics. RECENT FINDINGS Implant design for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has evolved considerably from the modern design developed by Paul Grammont. The Grammont design had a medialized center of rotation and distalized humerus resulting from a 155° humeral neck shaft angle. These changes intended to decrease the forces on the glenoid component, thereby decreasing the risk for implant loosening and improving the deltoid moment arm. However, these features also led to scapular notching. The Grammont design has been modified over the last 20 years to increase the lateral offset of the glenosphere and decrease the prosthetic humeral neck shaft angle to 135°. These changes were made to optimize functional range of motion while minimizing scapular notching and improving active external rotation strength. Lastly, the introduction of preoperative planning and patient-specific instrumentation has improved surgeon ability to accurately place implants and optimize impingement-free range of motion. Success and durability of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been contingent upon changes in implant design, starting with the Grammont-style prosthesis. Current humeral and glenoid implant designs vary in parameters such as humeral and glenoid offset, humeral tray design, liner thickness, and neck-shaft angle. A better understanding of the biomechanical implications of these design parameters will allow us to optimize shoulder function and minimize implant-related complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles J. Cogan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Jason C. Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim HM, Ricchetti ET, Hsu JE. What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1778-1784. [PMID: 35926178 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Mike Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ma J, Sahoo S, Imrey PB, Jin Y, Baker AR, Entezari V, Ho JC, Schickendantz MS, Farrow LD, Serna A, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET, Polster JM, Winalski CS, Derwin KA. Agreement between intraoperative and MRI assessments of rotator cuff pathology and two MRI-based assessments of supraspinatus muscle atrophy. JSES Int 2022; 6:948-956. [PMID: 36353424 PMCID: PMC9637799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based rotator cuff assessment is often qualitative and subjective; few studies have tried to validate such preoperative assessments. This study investigates relationships of preoperative MRI assessments made by conventional approaches to intraoperative findings of tear type, location, and size or MRI-assessed muscle occupation ratio. Methods Intraoperatively, surgeons assessed tear type, location, anterior-posterior (AP) width, and medial-lateral length in 102 rotator cuff repair patients. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed the preoperative MRI scans for these same parameters and supraspinatus muscle atrophy by both Warner classification and quantitative occupation ratio. Exact agreement proportions, kappa statistics, and correlation coefficients were used to quantify agreement relationships. Results Agreement between MRI readers’ and surgeons’ observations of tear status averaged 93% with κ = 0.38, and that of tear location averaged 77% with κ = 0.50. Concordance correlations of MRI and intraoperative measures of anterior-posterior and medial-lateral tear length averaged 0.59 and 0.56 across readers, respectively. Despite excellent interrater agreement on Warner classification (exact agreement proportion 0.91) and occupation ratio (concordance correlation 0.93) separately, correlations between these 2 measures were −0.54 and −0.64 for the 2 readers, respectively. Patients with Warner grade 0 had occupation ratios ranging from 0.5 to 1.5. Conclusion Correlations of preoperative MRI tear dimensions and muscle atrophy assessed by conventional approaches with intraoperatively measured tear dimensions and quantitative occupation ratio, respectively, were only fair. Since tear size and muscle atrophy are known strong predictors of outcomes following rotator cuff repair that may influence treatment decisions, surgeons need to be aware of the limitations of MRI methods. Continued development and validation of quantitative preoperative imaging methods to accurately assess these parameters are needed to improve surgical planning and prognosis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hsu JE, Bumgarner RE, Bourassa LA, Budge MD, Duquin TR, Garrigues GE, Green A, Iannotti JP, Khazzam MS, Koh JL, Matsen FA, Namdari S, Nicholson TA, Richter SS, Sabesan VJ, Virk MS, Whitson AJ, Yian EH, Ricchetti ET. What do positive and negative Cutibacterium culture results in periprosthetic shoulder infection mean? A multi-institutional control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1713-1720. [PMID: 35176494 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep tissue culture specimens obtained at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty are commonly positive for Cutibacterium. Clinical interpretation of positive cultures can be difficult. This was a multi-institutional study evaluating the accuracy of cultures for Cutibacterium using positive control (PC) and negative control (NC) samples. The relationship between time to culture positivity and strength of culture positivity was also studied. METHODS Eleven different institutions were each sent 12 blinded samples (10 PC and 2 NC samples). The 10 PC samples included 2 sets of 5 different dilutions of a Cutibacterium isolate from a failed total shoulder arthroplasty with a probable periprosthetic infection. At each institution, the samples were handled as if they were received from the operating room. Specimen growth, time to culture positivity, and strength of culture positivity (based on semiquantitative assessment) were reported. RESULTS A total of 110 PC samples and 22 NC samples were tested. One hundred percent of specimens at the 4 highest dilutions were positive for Cutibacterium. At the lowest dilution, 91% of samples showed positive findings. Cutibacterium grew in 14% of NC samples. Cutibacterium grew in PC samples at an average of 4.0 ± 1.3 days, and all of these samples showed growth within 7 days. The time to positivity was significantly shorter (P < .001) and the strength of positivity was significantly higher (P < .001) in true-positive cultures compared with false-positive cultures. CONCLUSIONS This multi-institutional study suggests that different institutions may report highly consistent rates of culture positivity for revision shoulder arthroplasty samples with higher bacterial loads. In contrast, with lower bacterial loads, the results are somewhat less consistent. Clinicians should consider using a shorter time to positivity and a higher strength of positivity as adjuncts in determining whether a tissue culture sample is a true positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- ASES PJI Multicenter Research Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sahoo S, Stojanovska M, Imrey PB, Jin Y, Bowles RJ, Ho JC, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET, Spindler KP, Derwin KA, Entezari V. Changes From Baseline in Patient- Reported Outcomes at 1 Year Versus 2 Years After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:2304-2314. [PMID: 34473586 PMCID: PMC10510728 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211023967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most orthopaedic journals currently require reporting outcomes of surgical interventions for at least 2 postoperative years, but there have been no rigorous studies on this matter. Various patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) have been used to assess the status of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair (RCR). HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that the mean shoulder-specific PROMs at 1 year improve substantially over baseline but that there is no clinically meaningful difference between the mean 1- and 2-year PROMs after RCR. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (level of evidence 1 and 2) reporting the shoulder-specific American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the Constant, or the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years after RCR. The methodologic quality of studies was assessed. Also, the random effects meta-analyses of changes in PROMs for each of the first and second postoperative years were conducted. RESULTS Fifteen studies (n = 11 RCTs; n = 4 cohort studies) with a total of 1371 patients were included. Studies were highly heterogeneous, but no visual evidence of major publication bias was observed. The weighted means of the baseline PROMs were 46.2 points for the ASES score, 46.4 points for the Constant score, and 38.8 points for the WORC Index. The first-year summary increments were 41.1 (95% CI, 36.0-46.2) points for the ASES score, 34.2 (95% CI, 28.8-39.6) points for the Constant score, and 42.9 (95% CI, 37.3-48.4) points for the WORC Index. In contrast, the second-year summary increments were 2.3 (95% CI, 1-3.6) points for the ASES score, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.9-4.4) points for the Constant score, and 2 (95% CI, -0.1 to 4) points for the WORC Index. CONCLUSION All PROMs improved considerably from baseline to 1 year, but only very small gains that were below the minimal clinically important differences were observed between 1 year and 2 years after RCR. This study did not find any evidence for requiring a minimum of 2 years of follow-up for publication of PROs after RCR. Our results suggest that focusing on 1-year PROMs after RCR would foster more timely reporting, better control of selection bias, and better allocation of research resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Martina Stojanovska
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter B. Imrey
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard J. Bowles
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason C. Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET, Haladik J, Bey MJ, Patterson TE, Subhas N, Li ZM, Iannotti JP. Validation of a 3D CT imaging method for quantifying implant migration following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2022; 40:1270-1280. [PMID: 34436796 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Glenoid component loosening remains a common complication following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA); however, plain radiographs are unable to accurately detect early implant migration. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of a method of postoperative, three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging with metal artifact reduction (MAR) to detect glenoid component migration following anatomic TSA. Tantalum bead markers were inserted into polyethylene glenoid components for implant detection on 3D CT. In-vitro validation was performed using a glenoid component placed into a scapula sawbone and incrementally translated and rotated, with MAR 3D CT acquired at each test position. Accuracy was evaluated by root mean square error (RMSE). In-vivo validation was performed on six patients who underwent anatomic TSA, with two postoperative CT scans acquired in each patient and marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) performed on the same days. Glenoid component migration was calculated relative to a scapular coordinate system for both MAR 3D CT and RSA. Accuracy was evaluated by RMSE and paired Student's t-tests. The largest RMSE on in-vitro testing was 0.24 mm in translation and 0.11° in rotation, and on in-vivo testing was 0.47 mm in translation and 1.04° in rotation. There were no significant differences between MAR 3D CT and RSA measurement methods. MAR 3D CT imaging is capable of quantifying glenoid component migration with a high level of accuracy. MAR 3D CT imaging is advantageous over RSA because it is readily available clinically and can also be used to evaluate the implant-bone interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeffrey Haladik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bone & Joint Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael J Bey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bone & Joint Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Thomas E Patterson
- Department of Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Naveen Subhas
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Zong-Ming Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brochin RL, Schiffman CJ, Hsu JE, Quigley RJ, Garrigues GE, Kohan EM, Namdari S, Ricchetti ET. New Approaches to the Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Shoulder. Instr Course Lect 2022; 71:361-376. [PMID: 35254794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the shoulder is a potentially devastating complication following shoulder arthroplasty. It is important to review the workup of PJI in the shoulder, including recently developed diagnostic criteria for shoulder PJI, along with detailed examination of the most common causative organism, Cutibacterium acnes. Treatment strategies for PJI of the shoulder include antibiotic therapy, surgical options, and what to do with unexpected positive cultures in revision arthroplasty. Surgeons should be familiar with bony and soft-tissue reconstructive options following explantation of an infected shoulder prosthesis.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ma J, Sahoo S, Imrey PB, Jin Y, Baker AR, Entezari V, Ho JC, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET, Polster JM, Winalski CS, Derwin KA. Inter-rater agreement of rotator cuff tendon and muscle magnetic resonance imaging parameters evaluated preoperatively and during the first postoperative year following rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:e741-e752. [PMID: 33930556 PMCID: PMC8551316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is standard of care for rotator cuff evaluation, with clinical interpretation usually limited to qualitative judgments. The reliability of MRI-based measurements and scoring systems has been evaluated only preoperatively or ≥6 months following rotator cuff repair, when repairs are in the later stages of healing. This study describes the MRI assessments and inter-rater agreement of various rotator cuff tendon and muscle parameters evaluated preoperatively and 4 times during the first postoperative year. METHODS Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed MRI scans of 42 patients preoperatively and 3, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after rotator cuff repair. Using standardized reading rules, readers assessed tendon integrity (5-point Sugaya classification), tear dimensions, muscle fat (5-point Goutallier classification) and atrophy (4-point Warner classification), muscle cross-sectional areas, and myotendinous junction distance. Raw exact agreement proportions, κ statistics, and correlation coefficients were used to quantify inter-rater agreement. RESULTS Readers showed moderate to substantial above-chance agreement in scoring rotator cuff tendon integrity and supraspinatus muscle atrophy and good to excellent agreement on tear dimensions and muscle cross-sectional areas but only fair to moderate agreement for fatty infiltration and myotendinous junction distance. Only fatty infiltration grades evidenced observer bias. Inter-rater agreement did not appear time dependent. CONCLUSION By use of defined reading rules in a research setting, MRI evaluations of rotator cuff tendon integrity, tear dimensions, muscle atrophy, and cross-sectional areas have reasonable reliability at all time points in the first postoperative year. However, the presence of clinically significant disagreements, even in such favorable circumstances, indicates the need for improved imaging tools for precise rotator cuff evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjin Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter B. Imrey
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew R. Baker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jason C. Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joshua M. Polster
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Carl S. Winalski
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sahoo S, Rodríguez JA, Serna M, Spindler KP, Derwin KA, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Electronic Prospective Data Collection Tool for Surgical Data in Shoulder Arthroplasty. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 31:422-429. [PMID: 34690468 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2020.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the validity and efficiency of the Outcomes Management and Evaluation (OME) system, a prospectively designed electronic data collection tool, for collecting comprehensive and standardized surgical data in shoulder arthroplasty. Methods Surgical data from the first 100 cases of shoulder arthroplasty that were collected into the OME database were analyzed. Surgeons completed a traditional narrative operative note and also an OME case report using an encrypted smartphone. A blinded reviewer extracted data from the operative notes and implant logs in the electronic medical records (EMR) by manual chart review. OME and EMR data were compared with regard to data counts and agreement between 39 variables related to preoperative pathology, including rotator cuff status and glenoid wear, and surgical procedures. Data counts were assessed using both raw percentages and with McNemar's test (with continuity correction). Agreement of nominal variables was analyzed using Cohen's unweighted kappa (κ) and of ordinal variables using the linearly weighted Cohen's test. Efficiency was assessed by calculating the median time needed to complete OME. Results Compared to the EMR, the OME database had significantly higher data counts for 56% (22 of 39) of the variables assessed. A high level of proportional and statistical agreement was demonstrated between the data in the two datasets. 10 of 39 variables had 100% agreement but could not be statistically compared because both datasets had the same single response under those variables. Among the 29 variables that were compared, 79% (23 of 29) of variables had >80% raw proportional agreement, and 69% (20 of 29) of variables showed at least substantial agreement (κ > 0.6). The median time for completing OME surgery data entry was 92 seconds (IQR 70 - 126). Conclusion The prospectively designed, electronic data entry system (OME) is an efficient and valid tool for collecting comprehensive and standardized surgical data on shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| | - José A Rodríguez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| | - Matthew Serna
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| | | | - Kurt P Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| | - Kathleen A Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA 44195
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim HM, Hsu JE, Ricchetti ET. What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:1865-1871. [PMID: 34403378 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Mike Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Iannotti JP, Jun BJ, Derwin KA, Ricchetti ET. Stepped Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 and B3 Glenoid Pathology: A Study of Early Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:1798-1806. [PMID: 33989252 PMCID: PMC8497441 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posterior glenoid bone loss is commonly associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Surgical management of bone loss in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains controversial. We studied the use of a stepped augmented glenoid component for management of Walch B2 and B3 glenoids and compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up with those achieved with a non-augmented component of the same design in Walch A1 glenoids. METHODS Ninety-two patients (42 A1, 29 B2, and 21 B3 glenoids) were prospectively followed after aTSA. Sequential 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed preoperatively, within 3 months postoperatively with metal artifact reduction (MAR) to define implant position, and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively with MAR. Scapular 3D registration with implant registration allowed 3D measurement of glenoid implant position, implant shift, and central peg osteolysis (CPO). RESULTS CPO with or without implant shift occurred in a higher percentage of B3 glenoids treated with the augmented glenoid component (29%) than A1 glenoids treated with a standard component (5%) (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the frequency of CPO between B2 glenoids with the augmented component (10%) and A1 glenoids with the standard component. There was no difference in postoperative glenoid component version and inclination between groups. B3 glenoids were associated with more component medialization relative to the premorbid joint line compared with A1 and B2 glenoids (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A stepped augmented glenoid component can restore premorbid glenoid anatomy in patients with asymmetric biconcave glenoid bone loss (Walch B2), with short-term clinical and radiographic results equivalent to those for patients without glenoid bone loss (Walch A1) treated with a non-augmented component. There is a greater risk of CPO in patients with moderate-to-severe B3 glenoid pathology with this stepped augmented glenoid component. Longer follow-up will help define the clinical implications of CPO over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ricchetti ET. CORR Insights®: A Comparison of Revision Rates for Osteoarthritis of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Primary Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Cemented All- polyethylene Glenoid: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:2225-2227. [PMID: 34415707 PMCID: PMC8445568 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ricchetti ET, Jun BJ, Jin Y, Ho JC, Patterson TE, Dalton JE, Derwin KA, Iannotti JP. Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:1417-1430. [PMID: 33835109 PMCID: PMC8360268 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenoid component position and radiolucency following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) analysis. METHODS In a series of 152 patients (42 Walch A1, 16 A2, 7 B1, 49 B2, 29 B3, 3 C1, 3 C2, and 3 D glenoids) undergoing anatomic TSA with a polyethylene glenoid component, sequential 3D CT analysis was performed preoperatively (CT1), early postoperatively (CT2), and at a minimum 2-year follow-up (CT3). Glenoid component shift was defined as a change in component version or inclination of ≥3° from CT2 to CT3. Glenoid component central anchor peg osteolysis (CPO) was assessed at CT3. Factors associated with glenoid component shift and CPO were evaluated. RESULTS Glenoid component shift occurred from CT2 to CT3 in 78 (51%) of the 152 patients. CPO was seen at CT3 in 19 (13%) of the 152 patients, including 15 (19%) of the 78 with component shift. Walch B2 glenoids with a standard component and glenoids with higher preoperative retroversion were associated with a higher rate of shift, but not of CPO. B3 glenoids with an augmented component and glenoids with greater preoperative joint-line medialization were associated with CPO, but not with shift. More glenoid component joint-line medialization from CT2 to CT3 was associated with higher rates of shift and CPO. A greater absolute change in glenoid component inclination from CT2 to CT3 and a combined absolute glenoid component version and inclination change from CT2 to CT3 were associated with CPO. Neither glenoid component shift nor CPO was associated with worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative 3D CT analysis demonstrated that glenoid component shift commonly occurs following anatomic TSA, with increased inclination the most common direction. Most (81%) of the patients with glenoid component shift did not develop CPO. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the relationships of glenoid component shift and CPO with loosening over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jason C. Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas E. Patterson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jarrod E. Dalton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and
Rheumatologic Institute (E.T.R., J.C.H., T.E.P., and J.P.I.), Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute (B.-J.J. and K.A.D.), and
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Y.J. and J.E.D.), Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Subhas N, Jun BJ, Mehta PN, Ricchetti ET, Obuchowski NA, Primak AN, Iannotti JP. Low-dose CT with metal artifact reduction in arthroplasty imaging: a cadaveric and clinical study. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:955-965. [PMID: 33037447 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03643-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether a simulated low-dose metal artifact reduction (MAR) CT technique is comparable with a clinical dose MAR technique for shoulder arthroplasty evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two shoulder arthroplasties in cadavers and 25 shoulder arthroplasties in patients were scanned using a clinical dose (140 kVp, 300 qrmAs); cadavers were also scanned at half dose (140 kVp, 150 qrmAs). Images were reconstructed using a MAR CT algorithm at full dose and a noise-insertion algorithm simulating 50% dose reduction. For the actual and simulated half-dose cadaver scans, differences in SD for regions of interest were assessed, and streak artifact near the arthroplasty was graded by 3 blinded readers. Simulated half-dose scans were compared with full-dose scans in patients by measuring differences in implant position and by comparing readers' grades of periprosthetic osteolysis and muscle atrophy. RESULTS The mean difference in SD between actual and simulated half-dose methods was 2.42 HU (95% CI [1.4, 3.4]). No differences in streak artifact grades were seen in 13/18 (72.2%) comparisons in cadavers. In patients, differences in implant position measurements were within 1° or 1 mm in 149/150 (99.3%) measurements. The inter-reader agreement rates were nearly identical when readers were using full-dose (77.3% [232/300] for osteolysis and 76.9% [173/225] for muscle atrophy) and simulated half-dose (76.7% [920/1200] for osteolysis and 74.0% [666/900] for muscle atrophy) scans. CONCLUSION A simulated half-dose MAR CT technique is comparable both quantitatively and qualitatively with a standard-dose technique for shoulder arthroplasty evaluation, demonstrating that this technique could be used to reduce dose in arthroplasty imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Subhas
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - Bong J Jun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Parthiv N Mehta
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Nancy A Obuchowski
- Department of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Andrew N Primak
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA, 19355, USA
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ho JC, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP. Central-peg radiolucency progression of an all-polyethylene glenoid with hybrid fixation in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with clinical failure and reoperation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1068-1077. [PMID: 32791097 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glenoid component loosening is a common cause of failure after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Prior studies of all-polyethylene glenoid implants with hybrid fixation did not show early glenoid radiolucency to be clinically significant. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical significance of progression of radiolucency around the central peg of the glenoid component. METHODS We identified 73 shoulders that underwent primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty between January 1995 and May 2015 for osteoarthritis with an all-polyethylene pegged glenoid, with a minimum follow-up interval of 2 years between early and late follow-up. Demographic, radiographic (central-peg osteolysis [CPO] and central-peg grading [CPG]), and outcome variables comprising the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) and revision surgery were collected. Clinical failure was defined as a PSS decrease >11.4 points (ie, PSS failure) or revision surgery. RESULTS The average patient age at surgery was 65 ± 7 years, and 63% of patients were men. The median initial follow-up period was 14 months (interquartile range, 12-25 months), and the final median follow-up period was 56 months (interquartile range, 47-69 months). Revision surgical procedures were performed in 4 patients, and 17 PSS failures occurred. We found that CPO at final follow-up, CPG progression, and worse PSS at follow-up were associated with revision surgery (P < .05). We also found younger age at surgery, CPO at final follow-up, CPG progression, and greater glenoid component retroversion at final follow-up to be associated with clinical failure (PSS failure or revision surgery) (P < .05). Multivariate analysis found only CPG progression to be associated with clinical failure (P < .001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION CPO and CPG progression were associated with clinical failure, defined as decreasing clinical outcome scores or revision surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason C Ho
- Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ricchetti ET, Khazzam MS, Denard PJ, Dines DM, Bradley Edwards T, Entezari V, Friedman RJ, Garrigues GE, Gillespie RJ, Grawe BM, Green A, Hatzidakis AM, Gabriel Horneff J, Hsu JE, Jawa A, Jin Y, Johnston PS, Jun BJ, Keener JD, Kelly JD, Kwon YW, Miniaci A, Morris BJ, Namdari S, Spencer EE, Strnad G, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. Reliability of the modified Walch classification for advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis: a study of the ASES B2 Glenoid Multicenter Research Group. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:736-746. [PMID: 32712455 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variations in glenoid morphology affect surgical treatment and outcome of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the modified Walch classification using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging in a multicenter research group. METHODS Deidentified preoperative CTs of patients with primary glenohumeral OA undergoing anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) were reviewed with 3D imaging software by 23 experienced shoulder surgeons across 19 institutions. CTs were separated into 2 groups for review: group 1 (96 cases involving all modified Walch classification categories evaluated by 12 readers) and group 2 (98 cases involving posterior glenoid deformity categories [B2, B3, C1, C2] evaluated by 11 readers other than the first 12). Each case group was reviewed by the same set of readers 4 different times (with and without the glenoid vault model present), blindly and in random order. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were calculated to assess agreement (slight, fair, moderate, substantial, almost perfect) within groups and by modified Walch classification categories. RESULTS Interobserver reliability showed fair to moderate agreement for both groups. Group 1 had a kappa of 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38, 0.48) with the glenoid vault model absent and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.46) with it present. Group 2 had a kappa of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.43) with the glenoid vault model absent and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.43) with it present. Intraobserver reliability showed substantial agreement for group 1 with (0.63, range 0.47-0.71) and without (0.61, range 0.52-0.69) the glenoid vault model present. For group 2, intraobserver reliability showed moderate agreement with the glenoid vault model absent (0.51, range 0.30-0.72), which improved to substantial agreement with the glenoid vault model present (0.61, range 0.34-0.87). DISCUSSION Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the modified Walch classification were fair to moderate and moderate to substantial, respectively, using standardized 3D CT imaging analysis in a large multicenter study. The findings potentially suggest that cases with a spectrum of posterior glenoid bone loss and/or dysplasia can be harder to distinguish by modified Walch type because of a lack of defined thresholds, and the glenoid vault model may be beneficial in determining Walch type in certain scenarios. The ability to reproducibly separate patients into groups based on preoperative pathology, including Walch type, is important for future studies to accurately evaluate postoperative outcomes in TSA patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- ASES B2 Glenoid Multicenter Research Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuxuan Jin
- ASES B2 Glenoid Multicenter Research Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ricchetti ET, Jun BJ, Jin Y, Entezari V, Patterson TE, Derwin KA, Iannotti JP. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of pathologic correction in total shoulder arthroplasty based on severity of preoperative pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:237-249. [PMID: 32777478 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to quantify correction of glenoid deformity and humeral head alignment in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty as a function of preoperative pathology (modified Walch classification) and glenoid implant type in a clinical cohort using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis. METHODS Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a standard glenoid (SG) (n = 110) or posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid (AG) (n = 62) component were evaluated with a preoperative CT scan and a postoperative CT scan within 3 months of surgery. Glenoid version, inclination, and medial-lateral (ML) joint line position, as well as humeral head alignment, were assessed on both CT scans, with preoperative-to-postoperative changes analyzed relative to pathology and premorbid anatomy based on the modified Walch classification and glenoid implant type. RESULTS On average, correction to the premorbid ML joint line position was significantly less in type A2 glenoids than in type A1 glenoids (-2.3 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Correction to premorbid version was not different between type B2 glenoids with AG components and type A1 glenoids with SG components (-1.7° ± 6.6° vs. -1.0° ± 4.0°, P = .57), and the premorbid ML joint line position was restored on average in both groups (0.3 ± 1.6 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P = .006). Correction to premorbid version was not different between type B3 glenoids with AG components and type A1 glenoids with SG components (-0.6° ± 5.1° vs. -1.0° ± 4.0°, P = .72), but correction relative to the premorbid ML joint line position was significantly less in type B3 glenoids with AG components than in type A1 glenoids with SG components (-2.2 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Postoperative humeral glenoid alignment was not different in any group comparisons. DISCUSSION In cases with posterior glenoid bone loss and retroversion (type B2 or B3 glenoids), an AG component can better correct retroversion and the glenoid ML joint line position compared with an SG component, with correction to premorbid version comparable to a type A1 glenoid with an SG component. However, restoration of the premorbid ML joint line position may not always be possible with SG or AG components in cases with more advanced central glenoid bone loss (type A2 or B3 glenoids). Further follow-up is needed to determine the clinical consequences of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas E Patterson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen A Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ricchetti ET. Editorial Commentary: Are Serum Inflammatory Markers Useful Diagnostic Tools in the Shoulder? Arthroscopy 2021; 37:83-85. [PMID: 33384103 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Serum inflammatory markers are commonly used to evaluate for the presence of surgical-site infection or periprosthetic joint infections following orthopaedic surgery. However, data on the utility of these tests following shoulder surgery are more limited. Worse diagnostic performance is seen in the shoulder when compared with use of these tests in the evaluation of hip and knee infections, likely due to the low virulence of the commonly cultured shoulder organisms, and the normalization of these serum markers following shoulder surgery is less well defined when compared with the hip and knee literature. A better understanding of the behavior of these serum inflammatory markers in the shoulder may enhance the utility of these tests in the diagnosis and management of infection following elective shoulder surgery.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bayomy AF, Schickendantz MS, Briskin IN, Farrow LD, Grobaty LE, Jones MH, McCoy BW, Miniaci A, Ricchetti ET, Rosneck JT, Sosic E, Spindler KP, Stearns KL, Strnad GJ, Williams J, Saluan PM. What Are the Predictors of Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes After Shoulder Instability Surgery? Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967120966343. [PMID: 33447618 PMCID: PMC7780330 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120966343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Prospectively collected responses to Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) questions after shoulder instability surgery are limited. Responses to these outcome measures are imperative to understanding their clinical utility. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate which factors predict unfavorable patient-reported outcomes after shoulder instability surgery, including “no” to the PASS question. We hypothesized that poor outcomes would be associated with male adolescents, bone loss, combined labral tears, and articular cartilage injuries. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients aged ≥13 years undergoing shoulder instability surgery were included in point-of-care data collection at a single institution across 12 surgeons between 2015 and 2017. Patients with anterior-inferior labral tears were included, and those with previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery were excluded. Demographics, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and surgical findings were obtained at baseline. ASES and SANE scores, PASS responses, and early revision surgery rates were obtained at a minimum of 1 year after the surgical intervention. Regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 176 completed follow-up responses (75.2%). Nonresponders had a younger age, greater frequency of glenoid bone loss, fewer combined tears, and more articular cartilage injuries (P < .05). Responders’ mean age was 25.1 years, and 22.2% were female. Early revision surgery occurred in 3.4% of these patients, and 76.1% responded yes to the PASS question. A yes response correlated with a mean 25-point improvement in the ASES score and a 40-point improvement in the SANE score. On multivariate analysis, combined labral tears (anterior-inferior plus superior or posterior tears) were associated with greater odds of responding no to the PASS question, while both combined tears and injured capsules were associated with lower ASES and SANE scores (P < .05). Sex, bone loss, and grade 3 to 4 articular cartilage injuries were not associated with variations on any patient-reported outcome measure. Conclusion: Patients largely approved of their symptom state at ≥1 year after shoulder instability surgery. A response of yes to the PASS question was given by 76.1% of patients and was correlated with clinically and statistically significant improvements in ASES and SANE scores. Combined labral tears and injured capsules were negative prognosticators across patient-reported outcome measures, whereas sex, bone loss, and cartilage injuries were not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmad F Bayomy
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Isaac N Briskin
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lutul D Farrow
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lauren E Grobaty
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Morgan H Jones
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brett W McCoy
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anthony Miniaci
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James T Rosneck
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Elizabeth Sosic
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kim L Stearns
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Greg J Strnad
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James Williams
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Paul M Saluan
- Investigation performed at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Karnuta JM, Churchill JL, Haeberle HS, Nwachukwu BU, Taylor SA, Ricchetti ET, Ramkumar PN. The value of artificial neural networks for predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient costs after anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2385-2394. [PMID: 32713541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE The objective is to develop and validate an artificial intelligence model, specifically an artificial neural network (ANN), to predict length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and inpatient charges for primary anatomic total (aTSA), reverse total (rTSA), and hemi- (HSA) shoulder arthroplasty to establish internal validity in predicting patient-specific value metrics. METHODS Using data from the National Inpatient Sample between 2003 and 2014, 4 different ANN models to predict LOS, discharge disposition, and inpatient costs using 39 preoperative variables were developed based on diagnosis and arthroplasty type: primary chronic/degenerative aTSA, primary chronic/degenerative rTSA, primary traumatic/acute rTSA, and primary acute/traumatic HSA. Models were also combined into diagnosis type only. Outcome metrics included accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS A total of 111,147 patients undergoing primary shoulder replacement were included. The machine learning algorithm predicting the overall chronic/degenerative conditions model (aTSA, rTSA) achieved accuracies of 76.5%, 91.8%, and 73.1% for total cost, LOS, and disposition, respectively; AUCs were 0.75, 0.89, and 0.77 for total cost, LOS, and disposition, respectively. The overall acute/traumatic conditions model (rTSA, HSA) had accuracies of 70.3%, 79.1%, and 72.0% and AUCs of 0.72, 0.78, and 0.79 for total cost, LOS, and discharge disposition, respectively. CONCLUSION Our ANN demonstrated fair to good accuracy and reliability for predicting inpatient cost, LOS, and discharge disposition in shoulder arthroplasty for both chronic/degenerative and acute/traumatic conditions. Machine learning has the potential to preoperatively predict costs, LOS, and disposition using patient-specific data for expectation management between health care providers, patients, and payers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaret M Karnuta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jessica L Churchill
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Heather S Haeberle
- Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Sports & Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benedict U Nwachukwu
- Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Sports & Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel A Taylor
- Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Sports & Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Prem N Ramkumar
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Machine Learning Arthroplasty Lab, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Guevara JA, Entezari V, Ho JC, Derwin KA, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. An Update on Surgical Management of the Repairable Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:1742-1754. [PMID: 32740266 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Guevara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jason C Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kathleen A Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shah SS, Roche AM, Sullivan SW, Gaal BT, Dalton S, Sharma A, King JJ, Grawe BM, Namdari S, Lawler M, Helmkamp J, Garrigues GE, Wright TW, Schoch BS, Flik K, Otto RJ, Jones R, Jawa A, McCann P, Abboud J, Horneff G, Ross G, Friedman R, Ricchetti ET, Boardman D, Tashjian RZ, Gulotta LV. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II. JSES Int 2020; 5:121-137. [PMID: 33554177 PMCID: PMC7846704 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous. Methods Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Results The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; P < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; P = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%. Conclusions Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarav S. Shah
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
- Corresponding author: Sarav S. Shah, MD, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| | | | | | - Benjamin T. Gaal
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Stewart Dalton
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Arjun Sharma
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph J. King
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Brian M. Grawe
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Surena Namdari
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Macy Lawler
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joshua Helmkamp
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | - Thomas W. Wright
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | - Kyle Flik
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Randall J. Otto
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Jones
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Peter McCann
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph Abboud
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Gabe Horneff
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Glen Ross
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Friedman
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | - Douglas Boardman
- ASES Multicenter Taskforce for RSA Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shah SS, Gaal BT, Roche AM, Namdari S, Grawe BM, Lawler M, Dalton S, King JJ, Helmkamp J, Garrigues GE, Wright TW, Schoch BS, Flik K, Otto RJ, Jones R, Jawa A, McCann P, Abboud J, Horneff G, Ross G, Friedman R, Ricchetti ET, Boardman D, Tashjian RZ, Gulotta LV. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I. JSES Int 2020; 4:929-943. [PMID: 33345237 PMCID: PMC7738599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this 2-part study was to systematically review each of the most common complications of RSA, limiting each search to publications in 2010 or later. In this part (part I), we examined (1) scapular notching (SN), (2) periprosthetic infection (PJI), (3) mechanical failure (glenoid or humeral component), and (4) neurologic injury (NI). Methods Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Overall, 113 studies on SN, 62 on PJI, 34 on mechanical failure, and 48 on NI were included in our reviews. Univariate analysis was performed with the χ2 or Fisher exact test. Results The Grammont design had a higher SN rate vs. all other designs combined (42.5% vs. 12.3%, P < .001). The onlay humeral design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (10.5% vs. 14.8%, P < .001). The PJI rate was 2.4% for primary RSA and 2.6% for revision RSA. The incidence of glenoid and humeral component loosening was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The Grammont design had an increased NI rate vs. all other designs combined (0.9% vs. 0.1%, P = .04). Conclusions Focused systematic reviews of the recent literature with a large volume of RSAs demonstrate that with the use of non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including SN, PJI, glenoid component loosening, and NI are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications for RSA continue to expand, it is imperative to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its cost and increased indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarav S Shah
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Benjamin T Gaal
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Alexander M Roche
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Surena Namdari
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Brian M Grawe
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Macy Lawler
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Stewart Dalton
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joshua Helmkamp
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Kyle Flik
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Randall J Otto
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Jones
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Peter McCann
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Joseph Abboud
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Gabe Horneff
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Glen Ross
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Richard Friedman
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Douglas Boardman
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Robert Z Tashjian
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sahoo S, Derwin KA, Zajichek A, Entezari V, Imrey PB, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Associations of preoperative patient mental health status and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with baseline pain, function, and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 30:e212-e224. [PMID: 32860879 PMCID: PMC7907259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND Shoulder pain and dysfunction are common indications for shoulder arthroplasty, yet the factors that are associated with these symptoms are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the associations of patient and disease-specific factors with preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that worse mental health status assessed by the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) mental component score (MCS), glenoid bone loss, and increasing rotator cuff tear severity would be associated with lower values for the preoperative total Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) and its pain, function, and satisfaction subscores. METHODS We prospectively identified 12 patient factors and 4 disease-specific factors as possible statistical predictors of preoperative PROMs in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution over a 3-year period. Multivariable statistical modeling and Akaike information criterion comparisons were used to investigate the unique associations with, and relative importance of, these factors in accounting for variation in the preoperative PSS and its subscores. RESULTS A total of 788 cases performed by 12 surgeons met the inclusion criteria, with a preoperative median total PSS of 31 points (pain, 10 points; function, 18 points; and satisfaction, 1 point). As hypothesized, a lower VR-12 MCS was associated with lower preoperative PSS pain, function, and total scores, but patients with intact status or small to medium rotator cuff tears had modestly lower PSS pain subscores (ie, more pain) than patients with large to massive superior-posterior rotator cuff tears. Glenoid bone loss was not associated with the preoperative PSS. Female sex and fewer years of education (for all 4 outcomes), lower VR-12 MCS and preoperative opioid use (for all outcomes but satisfaction), and rotator cuff tear severity (for pain only) were the factors most prominently associated with preoperative PROMs. CONCLUSION In addition to mental health status and rotator cuff tear status, patient sex, years of education, and preoperative opioid use were most prominently associated with preoperative PROMs in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Further studies are needed to investigate whether these factors will also predict postoperative PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alexander Zajichek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter B. Imrey
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,Address for Correspondence: Eric T. Ricchetti, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code A40, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA, Telephone: 216-445-6915, ,
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Diaz MA, Hsu JE, Ricchetti ET, Garrigues GE, Gutierrez S, Frankle MA. Influence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on torque and compression relationship. JSES Int 2020; 4:388-396. [PMID: 32490432 PMCID: PMC7256898 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A linear relationship between baseplate insertion torque and compression force in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) baseplates with central screw design has been recently established. In this study, we evaluated 3 different baseplate designs and their influence on the torque-compression relationship. Methods Three different RSA baseplate designs were evaluated through biomechanical testing using a glenoid vault, bone surrogate model. A digital torque gauge was used to measure insertion torque applied to the baseplate, whereas compression data were collected continuously from a load cell. Additionally, 2 predictive models were developed to predict the compression forces of each baseplate design at varying levels of torque. Results A linear relationship was found between baseplate compression and insertion torque for all 3 baseplate designs. Both the monoblock and 2-piece locking designs achieved the goal torque of 6.8 Nm, whereas the 2-piece nonlocking design did not due to material strip-out. No significant difference in maximum compression was found between the monoblock and 2-piece locking designs. However, the 2-piece nonlocking design achieved significantly higher compression. Both predictive models were shown to adequately predict compressive forces at different torque inputs for the monoblock and 2-piece locking designs but not the 2-piece nonlocking design. Conclusion The torque-compression relationship of a central screw baseplate is significantly affected by baseplate design. A 2-piece nonlocking baseplate reaches higher compression levels and risks material strip-out at lower insertional torques compared with a monoblock and 2-piece locking design. This has implications both on component design and on surgeon tactile feedback during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Diaz
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sergio Gutierrez
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Diaz MA, Garrigues GE, Ricchetti ET, Gutierrez S, Frankle MA. Relationship Between Insertion Torque and Compression Strength in the Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Baseplate. J Orthop Res 2020; 38:871-879. [PMID: 31692052 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a well-established procedure, however, there is limited data in the literature regarding adequate insertion torque and the resulting compression for glenoid baseplate fixation. In this biomechanical study, we evaluated the relationship between insertion torque and baseplate compression by simultaneously measuring the insertion torque and axial compressive forces generated by two reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplates with central screw design. Three different bone surrogates were chosen to mimic clinical scenarios where differences in compression achieved during baseplate insertion may exist due to varying bone quality. Epoxy resin sheets were combined with the bone surrogates to simulate the glenoid vault. A digital torque gauge was used to measure insertion torque applied to the baseplate, while compression data were collected continuously from a load cell. A strong positive correlation was found between baseplate compression and insertion torque. Among the lower density bone surrogates, neither baseplate design reached maximum insertion torque (6.8 Nm) due to material strip-out. This phenomenon did not occur in denser bone surrogates. Both baseplate designs experienced a significant increase in mean baseplate compression as insertion torque increased and were found to behave similar in the denser bone surrogates. The results presented here suggest that larger compressive forces can be achieved with an increase in insertion torque in denser bone surrogates, but caution must be used when trying to achieve fixation in poor-quality bone. Clinically, this could be useful preoperatively to minimize baseplate failure, and in further studies regarding baseplate design for improved initial fixation and stability. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:871-879, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Diaz
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, Florida
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Mark A Frankle
- Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.,Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sahoo S, Ricchetti ET, Zajichek A, Entezari V, Imrey PB, Iannotti JP, Derwin KA, Miniaci AA, Sabesan VJ, Schickendantz MS, Seitz WH, Spindler KP, Stearns KL, Strnad G, Turan A, Entezari V, Imrey PB, Iannotti JP, Derwin KA. Associations of Preoperative Patient Mental Health and Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics With Baseline Pain, Function, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:432-443. [PMID: 31851536 PMCID: PMC7033571 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519892570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder pain and dysfunction are common indications for rotator cuff repair surgery, yet the factors that are associated with these symptoms are not fully understood. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS This study aimed to investigate the associations of patient and disease-specific factors with baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized that tear size and mental health status, as assessed by the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey mental component score (VR-12 MCS), would be associated with baseline total Penn Shoulder Score (PSS) and its pain, function, and satisfaction subscale scores. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS We prospectively identified 12 patient factors and 12 disease-specific factors as possible statistical predictors for baseline PROMs in patients undergoing surgical repair of superior-posterior rotator cuff tears at a single institution over a 3-year period. Multivariable statistical modeling and Akaike information criterion comparisons were used to investigate the unique associations with, and relative importance of, these factors in accounting for variation in baseline PSS and its subscale scores. RESULTS A total of 1442 patients who had undergone surgery by 23 surgeons met inclusion criteria, with a baseline median total PSS of 38.5 (pain, 12; function, 24.2; satisfaction, 2). Adjusted R2 in multivariable models demonstrated that the 24 general patient and disease-specific factors accounted for 22% to 24% of the variability in total PSS and its pain and function subscale scores. Large/massive tear size was significantly associated with worse PSS total score and function score but not pain or satisfaction scores. Lower VR-12 MCS was significantly associated with worse total PSS and all 3 subscale scores. Among other factors significantly associated with baseline PROMs were sex, race, preoperative opioid use, years of education, employment status, acromion status, and adhesive capsulitis. Lower VR-12 MCS, preoperative opioid use, female sex, and black race were the factors most strongly associated with baseline PROMs. CONCLUSION Large/massive tear size, lower VR-12 MCS, and several additional patient and disease-specific factors are associated with baseline PROMs in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. Further studies are needed to investigate whether these factors will also predict poor postoperative PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Address correspondence to Kathleen A. Derwin, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, ND20, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA ()
| | | | - Vani J Sabesan
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - William H Seitz
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kurt P Spindler
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kim L Stearns
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Greg Strnad
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alparslan Turan
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter B Imrey
- Investigation performed at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ricchetti ET. Editorial Commentary: The Surgeon is the Method: Patient Positioning in Arthroscopic Repair of Shoulder Panlabral Tears. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:419-421. [PMID: 32014174 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Combined tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid labrum have not been commonly reported in the literature. These lesions represent a small, but significant portion of labral injuries. Care should be taken in the diagnosis and management of these lesions because preoperative physical examination and imaging may have limited ability to detect the full extent of pathology. Arthroscopic repair of panlabral tears produces good to excellent outcomes and a low rate of recurrent instability at short-term follow-up, both when performed in the beach chair position and in the lateral decubitus position. Surgical positioning, therefore, should be based on surgeon preference.
Collapse
|
38
|
Sahoo S, Baker AR, Jun BJ, Erdemir A, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP, Derwin KA. A novel radiopaque tissue marker for soft tissue localization and in vivo length and area measurements. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224244. [PMID: 31626672 PMCID: PMC6799909 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to describe the characteristics and demonstrate proof-of-concept and clinical use of a barium sulfate infused polypropylene radiopaque tissue marker for soft tissue localization and in vivo measurement of lengths and areas. METHODS Marker mechanical properties were evaluated by tensile tests. Biocompatibility was evaluated following 8-12 weeks' implantation in a pig model. Proof-of-concept of marker application was performed in a human cadaveric shoulder model, and methods for CT imaging and measurement of dimensions were established. Lastly, the method of clinical use of the markers was described in one patient undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). RESULTS The radiopaque markers had a tensile strength of 28 ±4.7 N and were associated with minimal to mild inflammatory tissue reaction similar to polypropylene control. CT-based measurements showed relatively high precisions for lengths (0.66 mm), areas (6.97 mm2), and humeral orientation angles (2.1°) in the cadaveric model, and demonstrated 19 ±3 mm medio-lateral tendon retraction and 227 ±3 mm2 increase in tendon area in the patient during 26 weeks following RCR. No radiographic leaching, calcification or local adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS The radiopaque tissue marker was biocompatible and had adequate strength for handling and affixation to soft tissues using standard suturing techniques. The marker could be used with low-dose, sequential CT imaging to quantitatively measure rotator cuff tendon retractions with clinically acceptable accuracy. We envision the radiopaque tissue marker to be useful for soft tissue localization and in vivo measurement of tissue and organ dimensions following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Andrew R. Baker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Bong Jae Jun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Ahmet Erdemir
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ricchetti ET. CORR Insights®: Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:2109-2111. [PMID: 31135533 PMCID: PMC7000101 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
40
|
Ricchetti ET. Editorial Commentary: In Search of the Optimal Diagnostic Tool for Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Shoulder. Arthroscopy 2019; 35:2578-2580. [PMID: 31500742 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
A number of perioperative diagnostic tests are currently available to evaluate for the presence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in painful shoulder arthroplasties. However, data on the utility of these tests are more limited in the shoulder, with worse diagnostic performance compared with the evaluation of hip and knee PJI because of the low virulence of the commonly cultured shoulder organisms, such as Cutibacterium acnes. Diagnostic arthroscopy with culturing of arthroscopic tissue samples may allow for a more definitive diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with shoulder PJI prior to revision shoulder arthroplasty, but data on the efficacy of this procedure have been limited.
Collapse
|
41
|
Mahylis JM, Entezari V, Jun BJ, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Imaging of the B2 Glenoid: An Assessment of Glenoid Wear. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2019; 3:2471549219861811. [PMID: 34497954 PMCID: PMC8282138 DOI: 10.1177/2471549219861811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) carries a spectrum of morphology and wear patterns of the glenoid surface exemplified by complex patterns such as glenoid biconcavity and acquired retroversion seen in the B2 glenoid. Multiple imaging methods are available for evaluation of the complex glenoid structure seen in B2 glenoids. The purpose of this article is to review imaging assessment of the type B2 glenoid. Methods The current literature on imaging of the B2 glenoid was reviewed to describe the unique anatomy of this OA variant and how to appropriately assess its characteristics. Results Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and standard 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) have all shown acceptable assessments of arthritic glenoids but lack the detailed and highly accurate evaluation of bone loss and retroversion seen with 3-dimensional CT. Conclusion Accurate preoperative identification of complex B2 pathology on imaging remains essential in planning and achieving precise implant placement at the time of shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared M Mahylis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Franciscan Health, Olympia Fields, Illinois
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sahoo S, Mohr J, Strnad GJ, Vega J, Jones M, Schickendantz MS, Farrow L, Spindler KP, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET, Derwin KA. Validity and efficiency of a smartphone-based electronic data collection tool for operative data in rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:1249-1256. [PMID: 31056396 PMCID: PMC6591049 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study tested validity and efficiency of Orthopaedic Minimal Data Set (OrthoMiDaS) Episode of Care (OME). METHODS We analyzed 100 isolated rotator cuff repair cases in the OME database. Surgeons completed a traditional operative note and OME report. A blinded reviewer extracted data from operative notes and implant logs in electronic medical records by manual chart review. OME and electronic medical record data were compared with data counts and agreement between 40 variables of rotator cuff disease and repair procedures. Data counts were assessed using raw percentages and McNemar test (with continuity correction). Agreement of categorical variables was analyzed using Cohen κ (unweighted) and of numerical variables using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Efficiency was assessed by median time to complete. RESULTS OME database had significantly higher data counts for 25% (10/40) of variables. A high level of proportional and statistical agreement was demonstrated between the data. Among 35 categorical variables, proportional agreement was perfect for 17%, almost perfect (0.81 ≤ κ ≤ 1.00) for 37%, substantial (0.61 ≤ κ ≤ 0.80) for 20%, moderate (0.41 ≤ κ ≤ 0.60) for 14%, fair (0.21 ≤ κ ≤ 0.40) for 6%, and slight (0.0 ≤ κ ≤ 0.20) for 6%. Of 5 numerical variables, agreement was almost perfect (CCC > 0.99) for 20% and poor (CCC < 0.90) for 80%. Median OME completion time was 161.5 seconds (interquartile range, 116-224.5). CONCLUSION OME is an efficient, valid tool for collecting comprehensive, standardized data on rotator cuff repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | - Jill Mohr
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA 44272
| | - Gregory J. Strnad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | - Jose Vega
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA 44272
| | - Morgan Jones
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | | | - Lutul Farrow
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| | - Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44195
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rodríguez JA, Entezari V, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder replacement: the surgical benefits and their clinical translation. Ann Joint 2019. [DOI: 10.21037/aoj.2018.12.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
44
|
Iannotti JP, Walker K, Rodriguez E, Patterson TE, Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:446-457. [PMID: 30845039 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.01614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) preoperative planning and patient-specific instrumentation has been demonstrated to improve the accuracy of glenoid implant placement in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of glenoid implant placement in primary TSA among different types of instrumentation used with the 3D CT preoperative planning. METHODS One hundred and seventy-three patients with end-stage glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in 3 prospective studies evaluating patient-specific instrumentation and 3D preoperative planning. All patients underwent preoperative 3D CT planning to determine optimal glenoid component and guide pin position based on surgeon preference. Patients were placed into 1 of 5 instrument groups used for intraoperative guide pin placement: (1) standard instrumentation, (2) standard instrumentation combined with use of a 3D glenoid bone model containing the guide pin, (3) use of the 3D glenoid bone model combined with single-use patient-specific instrumentation, (4) use of the 3D glenoid bone model combined with reusable patient-specific instrumentation, and (5) use of reusable patient-specific instrumentation with an adjustable, reusable base. Postoperatively, all patients underwent 3D CT to compare actual versus planned glenoid component position. Deviation from the plan (in terms of orientation and location) was compared across groups on the basis of absolute differences and outlier analysis. Univariable and multivariable comparisons were performed. As the initial analyses showed no significant differences in preoperative factors or in deviation from the plan between Groups 1 and 2 or between Groups 4 and 5 across studies, the final analysis was across 3 major treatment groups: standard instrumentation (Groups 1 and 2), single-use patient-specific instrumentation (Group 3), and reusable patient-specific instrumentation (Groups 4 and 5). RESULTS In nearly all comparisons, there were no significant differences in the deviation from the plan (absolute differences or outlier frequency) for glenoid implant orientation or location across the 3 major treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS This study did not demonstrate that any type of patient-specific instrumentation resulted in consistent differences in accuracy of glenoid implant placement in primary TSA with 3D CT preoperative planning. Surgeons have multiple patient-specific instrumentation options available for improving accuracy of glenoid implant placement when compared with 2D imaging without patient-specific instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kyle Walker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eric Rodriguez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas E Patterson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bong-Jae Jun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Derwin KA, Sahoo S, Zajichek A, Strnad G, Spindler KP, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Tear characteristics and surgeon influence repair technique and suture anchor use in repair of superior-posterior rotator cuff tendon tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:227-236. [PMID: 30318274 PMCID: PMC6339588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The factors that associate with surgical decisions about repair technique and the number of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair have not been previously investigated. This study investigated the extent to which patient, surgeon, and surgical factors associate with performing single-row vs. double-row repair technique and ultimately with the number of suture anchors used. METHODS Our institution's prospective surgical cohort was queried for patients undergoing suture anchor repair of superior-posterior rotator cuff tendon tears between February 2015 and August 2017. Exclusion criteria were patients with isolated subscapularis tears, tears that were not repaired, repairs without suture anchors, repairs involving graft augmentation, and repairs by surgeons with fewer than 10 cases. Multivariable statistical modeling was used to investigate associations between patient and surgical factors and the choice of repair technique and number of suture anchors used. RESULTS A total of 925 cases performed by 13 surgeons met inclusion criteria. Tear type (full thickness), tear size (medium, large, and massive), a greater number of torn tendons, repair type (arthroscopic), and surgeon were significantly associated with performing a double-row over a single-row repair. Tear size, a greater number of torn tendons, double-row repair technique, and surgeon were significantly associated with a greater number of anchors used for repair. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that in the absence of data to conclusively support a clinical benefit of one repair technique over another, surgeons' training, experience, and inherent practice patterns become the primary factors that define their surgical methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen A. Derwin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,Address for Correspondence: Kathleen A. Derwin, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, ND20, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA, Phone: 216-445-5982; Fax: 216-444-9198;
| | - Sambit Sahoo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alexander Zajichek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gregory Strnad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Clevel and Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kurt P. Spindler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Clevel and Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Clevel and Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Clevel and Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ho JC, Amini MH, Entezari V, Jun BJ, Alolabi B, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Posteriorly Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis with Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100:1934-1948. [PMID: 30480598 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.01282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of a posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid component, used in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with B2 or B3 glenoid morphology, to correct preoperative retroversion and humeral head subluxation and to identify factors associated with radiographic radiolucency and patient-reported clinical outcomes. METHODS We identified 71 shoulders with B2 or B3 glenoid morphology that underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with use of a posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid component and with a preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scan and a minimum of 2 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), shoulder range of motion, glenoid center-peg osteolysis, and postoperative version and humeral head subluxation were the main outcome variables of interest. RESULTS Follow-up was a median of 2.4 years (range, 1.9 to 5.7 years); the mean patient age at treatment was 65 ± 7 years (range, 51 to 80 years). PSS, range of motion, humeral head centering, and glenoid version were significantly improved among all patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with persistent posterior subluxation of the humeral head postoperatively had worse preoperative fatty infiltration of the teres minor and greater postoperative component retroversion (p < 0.05). Patients with center-peg osteolysis had more preoperative joint-line medialization and posterior glenoid bone loss (p < 0.05). Patients with more preoperative humeral head posterior subluxation had a lower PSS, adjusting for confounders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid components can improve pathologic retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humeral head in B2 and B3 glenoids, with significant improvements found in clinical outcome scores at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in the vast majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason C Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bong Jae Jun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bashar Alolabi
- St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Improving value in shoulder arthroplasty has gained increasing importance as procedure volume increases. To enhance the value of shoulder arthroplasty, an improvement of outcomes or a decrease in associated costs must occur. With the recent shift to a value-based care delivery model, analysis of the effects of surgical volume presents an opportunity to improve outcomes and reduce costs in shoulder arthroplasty. There are multiple reports in the literature expanding on the relationship between increased surgeon and hospital procedure volume and increased value for shoulder arthroplasty, by way of improved outcomes or decreased cost. This article highlights these studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prem N Ramkumar
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Heather S Haeberle
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 7200 Cambridge Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ma J, Piuzzi NS, Muschler GF, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET, Derwin KA. Biomarkers of Rotator Cuff Disease Severity and Repair Healing. JBJS Rev 2018; 6:e9. [DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
49
|
Kolmodin J, Davidson IU, Jun BJ, Sodhi N, Subhas N, Patterson TE, Li ZM, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. Scapular Notching After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Prediction Using Patient-Specific Osseous Anatomy, Implant Location, and Shoulder Motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100:1095-1103. [PMID: 29975263 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.00242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scapular notching is frequently observed following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although the etiology is not well understood. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans who underwent rTSA with a Grammont design were evaluated after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up with video motion analysis (VMA), postoperative three-dimensional (3D) CT, and standard radiographs. The glenohumeral range of motion demonstrated by the VMA and the postoperative implant location on the CT were used in custom simulation software to determine areas of osseous impingement between the humeral implant and the scapula and their relationship to scapular notching on postoperative CT. Patients with and without notching were compared with one another by univariable and multivariable analyses to determine factors associated with notching. RESULTS Seventeen patients (59%) had scapular notching, which was along the posteroinferior aspect of the scapular neck in all of them and along the anteroinferior aspect of the neck in 3 of them. Osseous impingement occurred in external rotation with the arm at the side in 16 of the 17 patients, in internal rotation with the arm at the side in 3, and in adduction in 12. The remaining 12 patients did not have notching or osseous impingement. Placing the glenosphere in a position that was more inferior (by a mean of 3.4 ± 2.3 mm) or lateral (by a mean of 6.2 ± 1.4 mm) would have avoided most impingement in the patients' given range of motion. Notching was associated with glenosphere placement that was insufficiently inferior (mean inferior translation, -0.3 ± 3.4 mm in the notching group versus 3.0 ± 2.9 mm in the no-notching group; p = 0.01) or posterior (mean, -0.3 ± 3.5 mm versus 4.2 ± 2.2 mm; p < 0.001). Two-variable models showed inferior and posterior (area under the curve [AUC], 0.887; p < 0.001), inferior and lateral (AUC, 0.892; p < 0.001), and posterior and lateral (AUC, 0.892; p < 0.001) glenosphere positions to be significant predictors of the ability to avoid scapular notching. CONCLUSIONS Osseous impingement identified using patients' actual postoperative range of motion and implant position matched the location of scapular notching seen radiographically. Inferior, lateral, and posterior glenosphere positions are all important factors in the ability to avoid notching. Only small changes in implant position were needed to avoid impingement, suggesting that preoperative determination of the ideal implant position may be a helpful surgical planning tool to avoid notching when using this implant design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Kolmodin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Iyooh U Davidson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bong Jae Jun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nipun Sodhi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Naveen Subhas
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas E Patterson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Zong-Ming Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ramkumar PN, Haeberle HS, Navarro SM, Sultan AA, Mont MA, Ricchetti ET, Schickendantz MS, Iannotti JP. Mobile technology and telemedicine for shoulder range of motion: validation of a motion-based machine-learning software development kit. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018. [PMID: 29525490 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile technology offers the prospect of delivering high-value care with increased patient access and reduced costs. Advances in mobile health (mHealth) and telemedicine have been inhibited by the lack of interconnectivity between devices and software and inability to process consumer sensor data. The objective of this study was to preliminarily validate a motion-based machine learning software development kit (SDK) for the shoulder compared with a goniometer for 4 arcs of motion: (1) abduction, (2) forward flexion, (3) internal rotation, and (4) external rotation. METHODS A mobile application for the SDK was developed and "taught" 4 arcs of shoulder motion. Ten subjects without shoulder pain or prior shoulder surgery performed the arcs of motion for 5 repetitions. Each motion was measured by the SDK and compared with a physician-measured manual goniometer measurement. Angular differences between SDK and goniometer measurements were compared with univariate and power analyses. RESULTS The comparison between the SDK and goniometer measurement detected a mean difference of less than 5° for all arcs of motion (P > .05), with a 94% chance of detecting a large effect size from a priori power analysis. Mean differences for the arcs of motion were: abduction, -3.7° ± 3.2°; forward flexion, -4.9° ± 2.5°; internal rotation, -2.4° ± 3.7°; and external rotation -2.6° ± 3.4°. DISCUSSION The SDK has the potential to remotely substitute for a shoulder range of motion examination within 5° of goniometer measurements. An open-source motion-based SDK that can learn complex movements, including clinical shoulder range of motion, from consumer sensors offers promise for the future of mHealth, particularly in telemonitoring before and after orthopedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prem N Ramkumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Heather S Haeberle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sergio M Navarro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Assem A Sultan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Joseph P Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|