Surgical Reduction and Fixation of Tibial Spine Fractures in Children: Multiple Fixation Strategies

MRI-Based Classification for Tibial Spine Fracture: Detection Efficacy, Classification Accuracy, and Reliability

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Recently, a new MRI-based classification for evaluating tibial spine fractures (TSFs) was developed to aid in treating these injuries. Our objective was to assess the detection efficacy, classification accuracy, and reliability of this classification in detecting and grading TSFs, as well as its impact on treatment strategy, compared to the Meyers and McKeever (MM) classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study included 68 patients with arthroscopically confirmed TSFs. All patients had plain radiography and conventional MRI of the affected knee before arthroscopy. Three experienced radiologists independently reviewed all plain radiographs and MRI data and graded each patient according to MM and MRI-based classifications. The detection efficacy, classification accuracy, and inter-rater agreement of both classifications were evaluated and compared, using arthroscopic findings as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 68 affected knees. Compared to the MM classification, the MRI-based classification produced 22.0% upgrade of TSFs and 11.8% downgrade of TSFs. According to the reviewers, the fracture classification accuracy of the MRI-based classification (91.2-95.6%) was significantly higher than that of the MM classification (73.5-76.5%, p = 0.002-0.01). The fracture detection rate of MRI-based classification (94.1-98.5%) was non-significantly higher than that of the MM classification (83.8-89.7%, p = 0.07-0.4). The soft tissue injury detection accuracy for MRI-based classification was 91.2-94.1%. The inter-rater reliability for grading TSFs was substantial for both the MM classification (κ = 0.69) and MRI-based classification (κ = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

MRI-based classification demonstrates greater accuracy and reliability compared to MM classification for detecting and grading TSFs and associated soft tissue injuries.

Thinner Tibial Spine Fracture Fragments Are Associated With Risk of Fixation Failure

Purpose

To determine the rate of and risk factors for failure of tibial spine fracture (TSF) repair.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or younger with TSF who underwent arthroscopic repair performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon at a large tertiary academic hospital between 2015 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, injury, fracture, and surgical characteristics were collected. Coronal length and sagittal length and height of the fracture fragment were measured on preoperative plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Results

Of 25 patients who underwent arthroscopic reduction with internal fixation of TSFs, 2 (8%) experienced fixation failure. In 16 (64%), internal fixation was performed with suture anchors, whereas 8 (32%) underwent internal fixation with screws. There were 19 male patients (76%). There were no differences in demographic factors (age, race, sex, and body mass index), injury characteristics (laterality, mechanism of injury, and activity causing injury), modified Meyers-McKeever fracture classification, or method of internal fixation between the group with fixation failure and the group without failure. Coronal length (14.2 mm vs 18 mm, P = .17) and sagittal length (13.9 mm vs 18.7 mm, P = .17) of the fracture fragment also did not differ significantly between groups. Sagittal height of the fracture fragment was thinner in patients with failure of fixation (4.3 mm) than in those without failure (8 mm) (P = .02).

Conclusions

Decreased bone thickness of the displaced fragment was associated with an increased likelihood of fixation failure.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

A Multicenter Comparison of Open Versus Arthroscopic Fixation for Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures

BACKGROUND

When operative treatment is indicated, tibial spine fractures can be successfully managed with open or arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF). The purpose of the study is to evaluate short-term treatment outcomes of tibial spine fractures in patients treated with both open and arthroscopic fracture reduction.

METHODS

We performed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective cohort study of pediatric tibial spine fractures presenting between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2019 at 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts based on treatment: ARIF and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Short-term surgical outcomes, the incidence of concomitant injuries, and surgeon demographics were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were 477 patients with tibial spine fractures who met inclusion criteria, 420 of whom (88.1%) were treated with ARIF, while 57 (11.9%) were treated with ORIF. Average follow-up was 1.12 years. Patients treated with ARIF were more likely to have an identified concomitant injury (41.4%) compared with those treated with ORIF (24.6%, P=0.021). Most concomitant injuries (74.5%) were treated with intervention. The most common treatment complications included arthrofibrosis (6.9% in ARIF patients, 7.0% in ORIF patients, P=1.00) and subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury (2.1% in ARIF patients and 3.5% in ORIF, P=0.86). The rate of short-term complications, return to the operating room, and failure to return to full range of motion were similar between treatment groups. Twenty surgeons with sports subspecialty training completed 85.0% of ARIF cases; the remaining 15.0% were performed by 12 surgeons without additional sports training. The majority (56.1%) of ORIF cases were completed by 14 surgeons without sports subspecialty training.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated no difference in outcomes or nonunion following ARIF or ORIF, with a significantly higher rate of concomitant injuries identified in patients treated with ARIF. The majority of identified concomitant injuries were treated with surgical intervention. Extensive surgical evaluation or pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in the workup of tibial spine fractures to increase concomitant injury identification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

What Are the Causes and Consequences of Delayed Surgery for Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study

Background:

The uncommon nature of tibial spine fractures (TSFs) may result in delayed diagnosis and treatment. The outcomes of delayed surgery are unknown.

Purpose:

To evaluate risk factors for, and outcomes of, delayed surgical treatment of pediatric TSFs.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of TSFs treated surgically at 10 institutions between 2000 and 2019. Patient characteristics and preoperative data were collected, as were intraoperative information and postoperative complications. Surgery ≥21 days after injury was considered delayed based on visualized trends in the data. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounders.

Results:

A total of 368 patients (mean age, 11.7 ± 2.9 years) were included, 21.2% of whom underwent surgery ≥21 days after injury. Patients who experienced delayed surgery had 3.8 times higher odds of being diagnosed with a TSF at ≥1 weeks after injury (95% CI, 1.1-14.3; P = .04), 2.1 times higher odds of having seen multiple clinicians before the treating surgeon (95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .03), 5.8 times higher odds of having magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ≥1 weeks after injury (95% CI, 1.6-20.8; P < .007), and were 2.2 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.3-3.9; P = .005). Meniscal injuries were encountered intraoperatively in 42.3% of patients with delayed surgery versus 21.0% of patients treated without delay (P < .001), resulting in 2.8 times higher odds in multivariate analysis (95% CI, 1.6-5.0; P < .001). Delayed surgery was also a risk factor for procedure duration >2.5 hours (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9; P = .006). Patients who experienced delayed surgery and also had an operation >2.5 hours had 3.7 times higher odds of developing arthrofibrosis (95% CI, 1.1-12.5; P = .03).

Conclusion:

Patients who underwent delayed surgery for TSFs were found to have a higher rate of concomitant meniscal injury, longer procedure duration, and more postoperative arthrofibrosis when the surgery length was >2.5 hours. Those who experienced delays in diagnosis or MRI, saw multiple clinicians, and had public insurance were more likely to have a delay to surgery.

Does Insurance Status Affect Treatment of Children With Tibial Spine Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported disparities in orthopaedic care resulting from demographic factors, including insurance status. However, the effect of insurance on pediatric tibial spine fractures (TSFs), an uncommon but significant injury, is unknown.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of insurance status on the evaluation and treatment of TSFs in children and adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of TSFs treated at 10 institutions between 2000 and 2019. Demographic data were collected, as was information regarding pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment, with attention to delays in management and differences in care. Surgical and nonsurgical fractures were included, but a separate analysis of surgical patients was performed. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 434 patients (mean ± SD age, 11.7 ± 3.0 years) of which 61.1% had private (commercial) insurance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at similar rates for children with public and private insurance (41.4% vs 41.9%, respectively; P≥ .999). However, multivariate analysis revealed that those with MRI performed ≥21 days after injury were 5.3 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.3-21.7; P = .02). Of the 434 patients included, 365 required surgery. Similar to the overall cohort, those in the surgical subgroup with MRI ≥21 days from injury were 4.8 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.2-19.6; P = .03). Children who underwent surgery ≥21 days after injury were 2.5 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.1-6.1; P = .04). However, there were no differences in the nature of the surgery or findings at surgery. Those who were publicly insured were 4.1 times more likely to be immobilized in a cast rather than a brace postoperatively (95% CI, 2.3-7.4; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Children with public insurance and a TSF were more likely to experience delays with MRI and surgical treatment than those with private insurance. However, there were no differences in the nature of the surgery or findings at surgery. Additionally, patients with public insurance were more likely to undergo postoperative casting rather than bracing.

Arthroscopic Epiphyseal Plate-Sparing Fixation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fracture in Skeletally Immature Patients

The tibial avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in skeletally immature patients poses challenges to orthopaedic surgeons due to the necessity of protecting the epiphysial plate during surgical reduction and fixation of the bone fragment. Several epiphysial plate-sparing techniques have been reported. However, the epiphysial plate is still in danger because in most of these techniques the fixation device is approaching the epiphysial plate or passing through it. We would like to introduce a suture fixation technique in which there is no fixation device passing through the fracture interface as well as the epiphysial plate. The critical points of this technique are ligating the ACL, retrieving the fixation suture distally along the anterior surface of the proximal tibia, and tying the fixation suture at an adjustable loop that is set distal to the proximal tibial epiphysial plate. Our clinical experience indicates that this technique is safe and effective. We consider the introduction of this technique will provide more feasible options when surgical treatment is indicated in case of ACL tibial avulsion fracture in skeletally immature patients.

Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures: Exploring Case Burden by Age and Sex

Background

Pediatric tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are a well-known clinical entity, but the epidemiology of these injuries is not fully understood. Further, there are limited data on outcomes after TSF treatment, specifically the proportion of patients requiring subsequent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Purpose

To describe the distribution of TSF case burden by age and sex and to determine the proportion of patients undergoing subsequent ACL reconstruction or developing ACL insufficiency.

Study Design

Descriptive epidemiology study.

Methods

The Truven Health MarketScan database was queried to identify patients aged 7 to 18 years with TSFs between 2016 and 2018. Diagnosis and initial treatment (surgical vs nonoperative) were recorded based on database coding. Case burden by age and sex was calculated. The database, which includes longitudinal data, was then queried for subsequent diagnoses of ACL insufficiency as well as subsequent ACL reconstruction procedures performed among the patients.

Results

We found 876 cases of TSF, 71.3% of which were treated nonoperatively. The male to female ratio for case burden was 2.2:1. Cases peaked at age 13 to 14 years for boys and age 11 to 12 years for girls. Of all cases identified, 3.7% also had either a diagnosis code for ACL laxity entered in a delayed fashion into the database or a later procedure code for ACL reconstruction (considered together to represent "subsequent ACL insufficiency"). Only 15 subsequent ACL reconstructions (1.7% of cases) were found, all of which were among boys and 9 of which were among boys aged 13 to 14 years.

Conclusion

This longitudinal study is the largest epidemiological analysis of pediatric TSFs to date. We found low rates of subsequent ACL insufficiency and ACL reconstruction, with boys aged 13 to 14 years accounting for most of those cases. Rates of subsequent ACL reconstruction were lower than previously reported. Boys accounted for more than two times as many TSF cases as girls.

Arthroscopic Suture Fixation of Tibial Eminence Fracture

Background:

Tibial eminence fractures account for up to 5% of knee injuries with an effusion in the pediatric population. Displaced fractures require reduction and operative fixation via arthroscopic or open techniques.

Indications:

Arthroscopic suture fixation and screw fixation are 2 of the most commonly described techniques for tibial eminence fracture treatment. We describe our preferred technique of arthroscopic suture fixation given the versatility of this technique and decreased risks of hardware irritation or impingement, need for reoperation, and minimal risk of physeal damage.

Technique Description:

The arthroscopic suture fixation technique uses a standard anteromedial and anterolateral portal. After the fracture bed and hematoma are debrided and any interposing structures (ie, meniscus) are removed from the fracture site, 2 nonabsorbable sutures are passed through the substance of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Using an ACL guide, 2 separate transtibial tunnels are drilled with a bone bridge in between—one at the anterolateral aspect of the fracture base and one at the anteromedial aspect. One limb from each suture is pulled out from each of the bone tunnels. The fragment is then reduced, and the sutures are tensioned and fixated using knotless suture anchors.

Results:

Overall prognosis following tibial eminence fracture fixation is favorable with more than 80% of patients returning to prior level of activity. Arthrofibrosis may occur in up to 25% of patients. Although some residual laxity may remain, there is a high return to sport and no difference in rate of subsequent ACL injury or surgery compared with a match cohort of pediatric ACL reconstructions.

Discussion:

Arthroscopic suture fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures is a reliable technique with high return to sport and low risk of reoperation. Arthrofibrosis is common; thus, early, controlled knee range of motion following surgery is critical.

Tibial Spine Fractures: How Much Are We Missing Without Pretreatment Advanced Imaging? A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

There is a high rate of concomitant injuries reported in pediatric patients with tibial spine fractures, ranging from 40% to 68.8%. Many tibial spine fractures are treated without initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To understand rates of concomitant injury and if the reported rates of these injuries differed among patients with and without pretreatment MRI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We performed an institutional review board-approved multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated for tibial spine fractures between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2019, at 10 institutions. Patients younger than 25 years of age with tibial spine fractures were included. Data were collected on patient characteristics, injury, orthopaedic history, pretreatment physical examination and imaging, and operative findings. We excluded patients with multiple trauma and individuals with additional lower extremity fractures. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with and those without pretreatment MRI. The incidence of reported concomitant injuries was then compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were 395 patients with a tibial spine fracture who met inclusion criteria, 139 (35%) of whom were reported to have a clinically significant concomitant injury. Characteristics and fracture patterns were similar between groups. Of patients with pretreatment MRI, 79 of 176 (45%) had an identified concomitant injury, whereas only 60 of 219 patients (27%) without pretreatment MRI had a reported concomitant injury (P < .001). There was a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears (P < .001) in patients with pretreatment MRI than in those without. However, there was a higher rate of soft tissue entrapment at the fracture bed (P = .030) in patients without pretreatment MRI. Overall, 121 patients (87%) with a concomitant injury required at least 1 treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pretreatment MRI had a statistically significantly higher rate of concomitant injury identified. Pretreatment MRI should be considered in the evaluation of tibial spine fractures to improve the identification of concomitant injuries, especially in patients who may otherwise be treated nonoperatively or with closed reduction. Further studies are necessary to refine the indications for MRI in patients with tibial spine fractures, determine the characteristics of patients at highest risk of having a concomitant injury, define the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in tibial spine fractures, and investigate patient outcomes based on pretreatment MRI status.